Combined plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for harvesting high-dose hematopoietic stem cells: Possible niche for plerixafor use in pediatric patients

Effective peripheral blood stem cell collection in a 4.6-kg child

BACKGROUND

Due to unique technical challenges, effective peripheral blood stem cell collections (PBSCs) have not been consistently reported in patients weighing less than 5 kg. We describe three PBSCs performed in a 4.6-kg child undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy for high-grade glioma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary group representing the clinical and apheresis teams adapted a PBSC protocol to accommodate the patient's size and collection targets. Special considerations included timing of the collection relative to chemotherapy, vascular access, strategies for monitoring adverse events during collection, and contingencies.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The patient underwent three PBSC procedures over 2 days due to suboptimal collection after the first two procedures. For procedure 1, a conservative inlet: anticoagulant (AC) ratio and AC infusion rate of 15 and 0.6 mL/min/L total blood volume (TBV) resulted in premature discontinuation due to clotting. A ratio of 8 and AC infusion rate of 1.5-1.7 mL/min/L TBV with subsequent titration to higher levels were adopted for the second and third procedures. These changes resulted in greater acid-citrate-dextrose exposure, that was managed by continuous calcium chloride infusion. There was no hypocalcemia, hypotension, or distress during any procedure. A total of 15 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. This retrospective review illustrates that PBSC can be safely undertaken in children weighing less than 5 kg.

Mobilization with high-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone at 12 μg/kg twice a day in high-risk pediatric patients: A retrospective analysis of the experience in a single center

INTRODUCTION

Mobilization regimes in pediatric patients at high risk for poor mobilization are not standardized across different institutions. We present a retrospective analysis of our experience with a high-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) regime of 12 μg/Kg per body weight (BW) twice a day for 4 days used in high-risk patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We report the results of all pediatric patients mobilized with high-dose G-CSF between January 1999 and February 2021 in our center. A successful mobilization was defined as a peripheral blood (PB) CD34⁺ cell count of ≥10 CD34⁺ cells/μl on the fifth day of mobilization immediately before leukapheresis. A minimum cell yield of ≥2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/Kg of BW was required for a successful collection.

RESULTS

Of the 262 patients included in the analysis, mobilization failure was found in 27 (10.3%). In a univariate analysis, this was associated with age, weight, baseline diagnosis, and having undergone a previous mobilization cycle, the latter being the only factor that remained significantly associated in a multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). The 54 patients (20.6%) did not reach the minimum required CD34⁺ cell yield. 50.4% of the patients reported adverse events (AEs) during the mobilization period, and 23 (9.1%) reported 3 or more concomitant AEs. However, all of them were mild and did not affect the mobilization schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most high-risk pediatric patients are successfully mobilized with the high-dose G-CSF regime, this approach does not salvage all of them and significantly increases the presence of AEs in comparison to standard-dose regimes.

Plerixafor stem cell mobilization in Japanese children: A post-marketing study

BACKGROUND

Plerixafor is approved in Japan for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization prior to autologous transplant, but limited data are available on the use in children. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor in Japanese children aged <15 years.

METHODS

A multicenter, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in Japan to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor in routine clinical practice. This subgroup analysis examined the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor administered as a once-daily, subcutaneous injection in children aged <15 years. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of patients with 2 × 10⁶ cells CD34+ cells/kg collected via apheresis within 4 days.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with solid tumors were included in this analysis; (median age 6.0 years, range, 1-13 years). In addition to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, all patients had received chemotherapy immediately prior to plerixafor administration. The mean (SD) daily dose of plerixafor was 0.24 (0.01) mg/kg. Seven of the 18 patients (38.9%) developed adverse drug reactions (ADRs), all occurring in patients aged ≥6 years and weighing ≥16 kg. The most common ADRs were pyrexia (n = 4), vomiting (n = 3), nausea (n = 2), and abdominal pain (n = 2). Twelve patients (66.7%) achieved a CD34+ cell count ≥2 × 10⁶ cells/kg within 4 days after the start of plerixafor administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide an encouraging sign that plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg may be safe and effective in pediatric patients in routine clinical practice in Japan, but further research in larger studies is needed.

Single-center results reporting improved hematopoietic stem cell mobilization success in pediatric and young adult patients with solid tumors and lymphoma

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) is an established treatment for pediatric and young adult patients with solid tumors and lymphomas. Plerixafor is a CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) antagonist that can be used with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to amplify the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 167 pediatric solid tumor and lymphoma patients from January 2010 to July 2020 in whom HSCs were mobilized using G-CSF alone or with plerixafor.

RESULTS

Thirteen heavily pretreated patients (33.3%) required twice-daily dosing of G-CSF compared to five patients (3.9%) in the not heavily pretreated group (p = .0005). Fourteen heavily pretreated patients (35.9%) required plerixafor compared to four patients (3.1%) in the comparison cohort (p = .0002). The number of mobilization days was similar between both cohorts, with 5 days (range 3-11 days) in the heavily pretreated group and 5 days (range 3-13 days) in the not heavily pretreated group (p = .55). The number of harvest days was 2 days (range 1-5 days) in the heavily pretreated group and 1 day (range 1-4 days) in the not heavily pretreated group (p = .0025). The final cluster of differentiation (CD)34⁺ /kilogram (kg) count was 9.52 × 10⁶ /kg among heavily pretreated patients compared to 34.99 × 10⁶ /kg CD34⁺ cells in the comparison group (p < .0001). Three heavily pretreated patients (7.7%) failed HSC mobilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at the highest risk for poor HSC mobilization can be successfully treated with more frequent G-CSF dosing or G-CSF with plerixafor in a large majority of cases.

A multicenter report on the safety and efficacy of plerixafor based stem cell mobilization in children with malignant disorders

BACKGROUND

Pleraxifor for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in children with malignancies is often given following failure of standard mobilization (SM) rather than as a primary mobilizing agent.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, we report the safety of plerixafor-based PBSC mobilization in children with malignancies and compare outcomes between patients who received plerixafor upfront with SM (Group A) with those who received plerixafor following failure of SM (Group B). In the latter pleraxifor was given either following a low peripheral blood (PB) CD34 (<20 cells/cu.mm) (Group B1) or as a second collection process due to an unsuccessful yield (CD34 + < 2 × 10⁶ /kg) (Group B2) following failed SM and first apheresis attempts.

RESULTS

The study cohort (n = 47) with a median age of 8 (range 0.6-21) year, comprised 19 (40%) Group A and 28 (60%) Group B patients (B1 = 12 and B2 = 16). Pleraxifor mobilization was successful in 87.2% of patients, similar between Groups A and B (84.2% vs 89.2%) and resulted in a median 4-fold increase in PB CD34. Median number of apheresis attempts was 2 in Groups A and B1 but 4 in Group B2. In Group B2, median total CD34+ yield post-plerixafor was 9-fold higher than after SM (P = .0013). Mild to moderate transient adverse events affected 8.5% of patients. Among patients who proceeded to autologous transplant (n = 39), all but one engrafted.

CONCLUSION

Plerixafor-based PBSC collection was safe and effective in our cohort and supports consideration as a primary mobilizing agent in children with malignancies.

Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has become a primary treatment for many cancers. Nowadays, the primary source of hematopoietic cells is by leukapheresis collection of these cells from peripheral blood, after a forced egress of hematopoietic cells from marrow into blood circulation, a process known as "mobilization". In this process, mobilizing agents disrupt binding interactions between hematopoietic cells and marrow microenvironment to facilitate collection. As the first essential step of HCT, poor mobilization, i.e. failure to obtain a desired or required number of hematopoietic cell, is one of the major factors affecting engraftment or even precluding transplantation. This review summarizes the available mobilization regimens using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor, as well as the current understanding of the factors that are associated with poor mobilization. Strategies to mobilize patients or healthy donors who failed previous mobilization are discussed. Multiple novel agents are under investigation and some of them have shown the potential to enhance the mobilization response to G-CSF and/or plerixafor. Further investigation of the risk factors including genetic factors will offer an opportunity to better understand the molecular mechanism of mobilization and help develop new therapeutic strategies for successful mobilizations.

The Biological and Clinical Relevance of G Protein-Coupled Receptors to the Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematized Review

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for several malignant and non-malignant diseases at the cost of serious treatment-related toxicities (TRTs). Recent research on extending the benefits of HSCT to more patients and indications has focused on limiting TRTs and improving immunological effects following proper mobilization and engraftment. Increasing numbers of studies report associations between HSCT outcomes and the expression or the manipulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This large family of cell surface receptors is involved in various human diseases. With ever-better knowledge of their crystal structures and signaling dynamics, GPCRs are already the targets for one third of the current therapeutic arsenal. The present paper assesses the current status of animal and human research on GPCRs in the context of selected HSCT outcomes via a systematized survey and analysis of the literature.

Collection of hematopoietic stem cells and immune effector cells in small children

Apheresis procedures are standard of care for a wide range of indications in children, collection of hematopoietic stem cells being the most frequent one. With increasing numbers of hematopoietic stem cell transplants, advances in graft manipulation techniques and the development of innovative therapies using immune effector cells and gene therapy, apheresis within the pediatric population is growing in demand. While young children have higher circulating white blood cell counts and robustly mobilize hematopoietic stem cells, apheresis machines were designed for use within the adult population and apheresis procedures in children, particularly small children, can be more challenging as vascular access, collection techniques and impact of extracorporeal volumes increase the rate of adverse events. In this article we review topics of particular relevance to hematopoietic stem cell and immune effector cell collections in small children.