1
|
Butensky AM, Desai S, Dilorenzo M, Lytrivi ID, Mantell BS, Zhang Y, Choudhury TA. Association Between High Sensitivity Troponin Levels Following Pediatric Orthotopic Heart Transplantation and Intensive Care Unit Resource Utilization. Pediatr Cardiol 2024; 45:829-839. [PMID: 38424311 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-024-03424-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
The utility of troponin levels, including high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) is controversial. Conflicting data exist regarding its use as a marker of acute rejection. Few studies have examined possible associations of hs-TnT levels immediately after OHT with metrics of intensive care unit (ICU) resource utilization or risk of acute rejection. We performed a retrospective cohort chart review including all OHT recipients < 20 years of age at our center between June 2019 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on supra- or sub-median initial hs-TnT levels (median 3462.5 ng/L). Primary outcome was days requiring ICU-level care, secondary outcomes included days intubated, days requiring positive pressure ventilation (PPV), days on inotropic medications, actual ICU length of stay, Vasoactive Inotrope Scores (VIS) on postoperative days (POD) 0 through 7, and acute rejection at 30 days and one year after OHT. Patients with higher hs-TnT required ICU level care for longer [13.5 (10-17.5) vs. 9.5 (8-12) days, p = 0.01] and spent more days intubated [6 (4-7) vs. 3 (3-5) days, p < 0.001], on PPV [9 (6-15) vs. 6 (5-8.5) days, p = 0.02], and on inotropes [11 (9-14) vs. 8 (7-11) days, p = 0.025]. VIS was only different between groups on POD7 [5 (3-7) vs. 3 (0-5), p = 0.04]. There was no difference in rejection between the groups. Higher hs-TnT immediately following pediatric OHT may predict higher ICU resource utilization, despite no difference in VIS, although it does not predict acute rejection in the first year after OHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam M Butensky
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Shyam Desai
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Dilorenzo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irene D Lytrivi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin S Mantell
- Division of Cardiology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Yun Zhang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tarif A Choudhury
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tambur AR, Bestard O, Campbell P, Chong AS, Barrio MC, Ford ML, Gebel HM, Heidt S, Hickey M, Jackson A, Kosmoliaptsis V, Lefaucheur C, Louis K, Mannon RB, Mengel M, Morris A, Pinelli DF, Reed EF, Schinstock C, Taupin JL, Valenzuela N, Wiebe C, Nickerson P. Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:133-149. [PMID: 36695615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anita S Chong
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Martha Crespo Barrio
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar & Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mandy L Ford
- Department of Surgery and Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Louis
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anna Morris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David F Pinelli
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology, Saint Louis Hospital and University Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Power A, Baez Hernandez N, Dipchand AI. Rejection surveillance in pediatric heart transplant recipients: Critical reflection on the role of frequent and long-term routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies and comprehensive review of non-invasive rejection screening tools. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14214. [PMID: 35178843 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite significant medical advances in the field of pediatric heart transplantation (HT), acute rejection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold-standard method for diagnosing rejection but is an invasive, expensive, and stressful process. Given the potential adverse consequences of rejection, routine post-transplant rejection surveillance protocols incorporating EMB are widely employed to detect asymptomatic rejection. Each center employs their own specific routine rejection surveillance protocol, with no consensus on the optimal approach and with high inter-center variability. The utility of high-frequency and long-term routine surveillance biopsies (RSB) in pediatric HT has been called into question. METHODS Sources for this comprehensive review were primarily identified through searches in biomedical databases including MEDLINE and Embase. RESULTS The available literature suggests that the diagnostic yield of RSB is low beyond the first year post-HT and that a reduction in RSB intensity from high-frequency to low-frequency can be done safely with no impact on early and mid-term survival. Though there are emerging non-invasive methods of detecting asymptomatic rejection, the evidence is not yet strong enough for any test to replace EMB. CONCLUSION Overall, pediatric HT centers in North America should likely be doing fewer RSB than are currently performed. Risk factors for rejection should be considered when designing the optimal rejection surveillance strategy. Noninvasive testing including emerging biomarkers may have a complementary role to aid in safely reducing the need for RSB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Power
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Nathanya Baez Hernandez
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anne I Dipchand
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schotters FL, Beime J, Briem-Richter A, Binder T, Herden U, Grabhorn EF. Impact of donor-specific antibodies on long-term graft survival with pediatric liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:673-685. [PMID: 34239702 PMCID: PMC8239487 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i6.673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a previous paper, we reported a high prevalence of donor-specific antibody (DSA) in pediatric patients with chronic rejection and expressed the need for confirmation of these findings in a larger cohort.
AIM To clarify the importance of DSAs on long-term graft survival in a larger cohort of pediatric patients.
METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 123 pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients who participated in yearly follow-ups including Luminex testing for DSA at our center. The cohort was split into two groups according to the DSA status (DSA-positive n = 54, DSA-negative n = 69). Groups were compared with regard to liver function, biopsy findings, graft survival, need for re-LT and immunosuppressive medication.
RESULTS DSA-positive pediatric patients showed a higher prevalence of chronic rejection (P = 0.01), fibrosis (P < 0.001) and re-transplantation (P = 0.018) than DSA-negative patients. Class II DSAs particularly influenced graft survival. Alleles DQ2, DQ7, DQ8 and DQ9 might serve as indicators for the risk of chronic rejection and/or allograft fibrosis. Mean fluorescence intensity levels and DSA number did not impact graft survival. Previous episodes of chronic rejection might lead to DSA development.
CONCLUSION DSA prevalence significantly affected long-term liver allograft performance and liver allograft survival in our cohort of pediatric LT. Screening for class II DSAs in combination with assessment of protocol liver biopsies for chronic antibody-mediated rejection improved early identification of patients at risk of graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicitas Leonie Schotters
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Jan Beime
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Andrea Briem-Richter
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Thomas Binder
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Human Leucocyte Antigen Laboratory, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock 18057, Germany
| | - Uta Herden
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Enke Freya Grabhorn
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sisson TM, Padilla LA, Hubbard M, Smith S, Pearce FB, Collins JL, Carlo WF. Impact of induction strategy change on first-year rejection in pediatric heart transplantation at a single center-From postoperative basiliximab to either postoperative anti-thymocyte globulin or preoperative basiliximab. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14314. [PMID: 33838071 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our pediatric heart transplant center transitioned from post-bypass basiliximab (BAS) induction to either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or pre-bypass BAS. The purpose of this study was to compare first-year rejection rates before and after this change. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of pediatric heart transplant recipients from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcome was first-year rejection. Bivariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariable regression were performed across eras. RESULTS Forty-three early era patients (55%) received post-bypass BAS, and 35 late era patients (45%) received pre-bypass BAS (n = 17) or ATG (n = 18). First-year rejection decreased in the late era (31% vs 53%, p = .05). This finding was more pronounced after excluding infants (38% vs 73%, p = .006). Late era was associated with a decreased likelihood of rejection (all cohort OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.66; infants excluded OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.61). No differences in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, donor-specific antibody, or infection were observed. CONCLUSIONS Fewer late era patients receiving ATG or pre-bypass BAS induction had first-year rejection compared to the early era patients receiving standard post-bypass BAS induction. This programmatic shift in induction strategy was readily achievable and potentially effective in reducing first-year rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luz A Padilla
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Sally Smith
- Children's of Alabama Heart Transplant Program, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Frank Bennett Pearce
- Children's of Alabama Heart Transplant Program, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jacqueline Leslie Collins
- Children's of Alabama Heart Transplant Program, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Waldemar F Carlo
- Children's of Alabama Heart Transplant Program, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Does the antibody mediated rejection grading scale have prognostic prediction? Yes, but the picture is still blurry. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 24:265-270. [PMID: 31090634 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a condition difficult to diagnose and treat, which may significantly impair the outcome of heart transplant recipients. In clinical practice, diagnosis is based on immunopathology grading of endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Despite its value, the current diagnostic system has several pitfalls that have been addressed in recent literature. RECENT FINDINGS Pathology grading of ABMR (pAMR) has a relevant prognostic factor. However, it does not capture several nuances, such as chronic vs. acute ABMR, mixed rejection or microvascular inflammation. Molecular biology-based assays are shedding new light on the mechanisms of ABMR, which could improve the precision of ABMR diagnosis. SUMMARY These new findings have the potential to rearrange EMB grading system and to guide more precisely decision-making, but studies validating the therapeutic management based on molecular-pathology coupling are still missing.
Collapse
|
7
|
Peng DM, Ding VY, Hollander SA, Khalapyan T, Dykes JC, Rosenthal DN, Almond CS, Sakarovitch C, Desai M, McElhinney DB. Long-term surveillance biopsy: Is it necessary after pediatric heart transplant? Pediatr Transplant 2019; 23:e13330. [PMID: 30506612 PMCID: PMC8063536 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Due to limited and conflicting data in pediatric patients, long-term routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (RSB) in pediatric heart transplant (HT) remains controversial. We sought to characterize the rate of positive RSB and determine factors associated with RSB-detected rejection. Records of patients transplanted at a single institution from 1995 to 2015 with >2 year of post-HT biopsy data were reviewed for RSB-detected rejections occurring >2 year post-HT. We illustrated the trajectory of significant rejections (ISHLT Grade ≥3A/2R) among total RSB performed over time and used multivariable logistic regression to model the association between time and risk of rejection. We estimated Kaplan-Meier freedom from rejection rates by patient characteristics and used the log-rank test to assess differences in rejection probabilities. We identified the best-fitting Cox proportional hazards regression model. In 140 patients, 86% did not have any episodes of significant RSB-detected rejection >2 year post-HT. The overall empirical rate of RSB-detected rejection >2 year post-HT was 2.9/100 patient-years. The percentage of rejection among 815 RSB was 2.6% and remained stable over time. Years since transplant remained unassociated with rejection risk after adjusting for patient characteristics (OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.78-1.23; P = 0.86). Older age at HT was the only factor that remained significantly associated with risk of RSB-detected rejection under multivariable Cox analysis (P = 0.008). Most pediatric patients did not have RSB-detected rejection beyond 2 years post-HT, and the majority of those who did were older at time of HT. Indiscriminate long-term RSB in pediatric heart transplant should be reconsidered given the low rate of detected rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Peng
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Victoria Y. Ding
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Seth A. Hollander
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Tigran Khalapyan
- Clinical and Translational Research Program, Palo Alto, California
| | - John C. Dykes
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - David N. Rosenthal
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Christopher S. Almond
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Palo Alto, California
| | - Charlotte Sakarovitch
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Manisha Desai
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Doff B. McElhinney
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Palo Alto, California,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|