Pediatric donor heart allocation in the United States, 2006-2017: Current patterns and potential for improvement

Improvement in patient selection, management and outcomes in infant heart transplant from 2000 to 2020

OBJECTIVES

The study's primary outcome was to evaluate if post-transplant survival has improved over the last 2 decades. Secondary outcomes were the infant's waitlist mortality, waitlist time and identifying factors that affected the infant's survival.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for infants (age ≤ 1) who were listed for heart transplantation between 2000 and 2020. The years were divided into 3 eras (Era 1 2000-2006, Era 2 2007-2013 and Era 3 2014-2020). Non-parametric tests, Chi-Squared, Log-Rank test and Cox-Proportional hazard ratio were used for analysis (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

4234 infants were listed for heart transplants between 2000 and 2020. At the time of listing, Infants in era 3 were more likely to be heavier [in kg (P < 0.001)] and had better renal function (P < 0.001). Additionally, they were less likely to be on dialysis (P < 0.001), on a ventilator (P < 0.001) and on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P < 0.001). There has been a significant increase in left ventricular assist device use (P < 0.001), though there was no difference in waitlist (0.154) or post-transplant survival (0.51). In all 3 eras, waitlist survival (P < 0.001) and post-transplant survival (P < 0.001) have improved significantly. Congenital heart disease and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with worse waitlist survival in all 3 eras (P < 0.05). Infants are now waiting longer on the waitlist (in days) (33 Era 1 vs 46 Era 2 vs 67 Era 3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infant heart transplant outcomes have improved, but they are now waiting longer on the waitlist. Further improvement in increasing the donor pool, expert consensus on listing strategies and donor utilization is needed to improve outcomes.

Pediatric donor heart utilization variability among organ procurement organizations

BACKGROUND

Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are responsible for the medical management of organ donors. Given the variability in pediatric donor heart utilization among OPOs, we examined factors that may explain this variability, including differences in donor medical management, organ quality, and candidate factors.

METHODS

The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database was queried for pediatric (<18 years) heart donors and candidates receiving pediatric donor heart offers from 2010 to 2019. OPOs were stratified by pediatric donor heart utilization rate, and the top and bottom quintiles were compared based on donor management strategies and outcomes. A machine learning algorithm, combining 11 OPO, donor, candidate, and offer variables, was used to determine factors most predictive of whether a heart offer is accepted.

RESULTS

There was no clinically significant difference between the top and bottom quintile OPOs in baseline donor characteristics, distance between donor and listing center, management strategies, or organ quality. Machine learning modeling suggested neither OPO donor management nor cardiac function is the primary driver of whether an organ is accepted. Instead, number of prior donor offer refusals and individual listing center receiving the offer were two of the most predictive variables of organ acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

OPO clinical practice variation does not seem to account for the discrepancy in pediatric donor heart utilization rates among OPOs. Listing center acceptance practice and prior number of donor refusals seem to be the important drivers of heart utilization and may at least partially account for the variation in OPO heart utilization rates given the regional association between OPOs and listing centers.

Donor heart refusal after circulatory death: An analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing refusal codes

Objective

Donor hearts procured after circulatory death (DCD) may significantly increase the number of hearts available for transplantation. The purpose of this study was to analyze current DCD and brain-dead donor (DBD) heart transplantation rates and characterize organ refusal using the most up-to-date United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data.

Methods

We analyzed UNOS and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network DBD and DCD candidate, transplantation, and demographic data from 2020 through 2022 and 2022 refusal code data to characterize DCD heart use and refusal. Subanalyses were performed to characterize DCD donor demographics and regional transplantation rate variance.

Results

DCD hearts were declined 3.37 times more often than DBD hearts. The most frequently used code for DCD refusal was neurologic function, related to concerns of a prolonged dying process and organ preservation. In 2022, 92% (1329/1452) of all DCD refusals were attributed to neurologic function. When compared with DBD, DCD donor hearts were more frequently declined as the result of prolonged warm ischemic time (odds ratio, 5.65; 95% confidence interval, 4.07-7.86) and other concerns over organ preservation (odds ratio, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 3.33-4.94). Transplantation rate variation was observed between demographic groups and UNOS regions. DCD transplantation rates are currently experiencing second order polynomial growth.

Conclusions

DCD donor hearts are declined more frequently than DBD. DCD heart refusals result from concerns over a prolonged dying process and organ preservation. Heart transplantation rates may be substantially improved by ex situ hemodynamic assessment, adoption of normothermic regional perfusion guidelines, and quality initiatives.

Later Brain Death Declaration Correlates to Favorable Donor Characteristics but Decreased Heart Acceptance

BACKGROUND

With rates of potential donor heart discard as high as 66% nationally, quality improvement efforts must seek to optimize donor utilization. Whether the timing of donor brain death declaration (BDD) influences organ acceptance is understudied. The authors sought to characterize the impacts of time between donor hospital admission and BDD on heart utilization and posttransplant outcomes.

METHODS

All potential heart donors and recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were identified (2006-2021). Admission-to-BDD cohorts were: 1 to 2 d (n = 52 469), 3 to 4 d (n = 44 033), 5 to 7 d (n = 24 509), and 8 to 10 d (n = 8576). Donor clinical characteristics were compared between cohorts, and donor acceptance was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression. Recipient posttransplant survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Donor demographics and comorbidity profiles (diabetes and hypertension) were comparable across cohorts. Anoxia/overdose deaths were more common (10% > 21% > 24% > 18%, respectively) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation requirements were higher (37% > 52% > 58% > 47%) when BDD occurred longer after admission. Renal dysfunction (44% > 44% > 35% > 29%) and inotrope requirements (52% > 25% > 36% > 29%) were lower in the later BDD cohorts. Proportions of hepatic dysfunction (18%-21%) and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (13%-16%) were clinically equivalent. Donor acceptance differed by admission-to-BDD cohort (36% [1-2 d], 34% [3-4 d], 30% [5-7 d], and 28% [8-10 d]). Admission-to-BDD >4 d was independently associated with lower odds of acceptance on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.79, P  < 0.001). Recipients experienced equivalent posttransplant survival for all donor admission-to-BDD cohorts ( P  = 0.999 adults and P  = 0.260 pediatrics).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart donors with later BDD were disproportionately discarded despite similar-to-favorable overall clinical profiles, resulting in nearly 3000 fewer transplants during the study. Increased utilization of donors with later BDD and "high-risk" characteristics (eg, anoxia/overdose, cardiopulmonary resuscitation requirement) can improve rates of transplantation without compromising outcomes.

Heart transplant offers are less likely to be accepted on weekends, holidays, and conferences

BACKGROUND

The existence of a "weekend effect" in heart transplantation (HTx) is understudied. The present study sought to determine whether the odds of (HTx) offer acceptance differed for adult and pediatric candidates depending upon the day on which the offer occurred.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing data were used to identify all HTx offers to adult (listing age ≥18) and pediatric candidates from 2000-2019. Odds of offer acceptance were studied, comparing weekends, holidays, and conferences (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS], American Association for Thoracic Surgery [AATS], International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT]) to "baseline" (all other days). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of offer nonacceptance, controlling for the impacts of program transplant volume, region, and candidate characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 323,953 offers occurred - 298,405 to adults and 25,548 to pediatric candidates. Clinically significant differences did not exist in donor or candidate characteristics between baseline or other events. The number of offers per day was stable throughout the year for both adults (p = 0.191) and pediatrics (p = 0.976). In adults, independently lower odds of acceptance existed on weekends (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.92]), conferences in aggregate (0.86 [0.77-0.95]), and holidays in aggregate (0.81 [0.72-0.91]). In children, independently lower odds of acceptance were seen on weekends (0.88 [0.79-0.98]), during STS (0.46 [0.25-0.83], and during Christmas (0.32 [0.14-0.76]).

CONCLUSIONS

The day on which a HTx offer occurs significantly impacts its likelihood of acceptance. Further work can determine the impacts of human behavior or resource distribution, but knowledge of this phenomenon can inform efforts to ensure ideal organ allocation throughout the year.

Pediatric heart transplantation: The past, the present, and the future

Heart transplantation (HTx) has a storied past, with origins dating back to the early twentieth century and the first pediatric orthotopic heart transplant performed in 1967 on a neonate with Ebstein abnormality. Today, approximately 500 pediatric HTx are performed annually, with survival times now measured in decades rather than days or weeks. In large part, advances in immunosuppression, critical care, dedicated transplant teams and mechanical circulatory support have paved the way for improvements in waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival, with future directions including the development of intracorporeal ventricular assist devices (VADs) for small children, expanding/standardizing donor criteria, and xenotransplantation.