Interplay between donor and recipient factors impacts outcomes after pediatric heart transplantation: An analysis from the united network for organ sharing database

Impact of prolonged ischemic time on pediatric heart transplantation outcomes: Improved outcomes in the most recent era

BACKGROUND

Impacts of ischemic time (IT) on pediatric heart transplant outcomes are multifactorial. We aimed to analyze the effect of prolonged IT on graft loss after pediatric heart transplantation. We hypothesized that graft survival with prolonged IT has improved across eras.

METHODS

Patients <18 years old in the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society database were included (N=6,765) and stratified by diagnosis and era (1993-2004, 2005-2009, and 2010-2019). Severe graft failure (SGF) was defined as death, retransplant, or need for mechanical circulatory support in the first 7 days post-transplant. Descriptive statistical methods were used to compare differences between patient characteristics and IT. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared freedom from graft loss, rejection, and infection. Multivariable analysis was performed for graft loss and SGF (hazard and logistic regression modeling, respectively).

RESULTS

Diagnoses were cardiomyopathy (N = 3,246) and congenital heart disease (CHD; N = 3,305). CHD were younger, more likely to have an IT ≥4.5 hours, and more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation at transplant (all p < 0.001). Median IT was 3.6 hours (interquartile range 2.98-4.31; range 0-10.5). IT was associated with early graft loss (HR 1.012, 95% CI 1.005-1.019), but not when analyzed only in the most recent era. IT was associated with SGF (OR 1.016 95%CI 1.003-1.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor IT was independently associated with an increased risk of graft loss, albeit with a small effect relative to other risk factors. Graft survival with prolonged IT has improved in the most recent era but the risk of SGF persists.

Increasing donor-recipient weight mismatch in infant heart transplantation is associated with shorter waitlist duration and no increased morbidity or mortality

OBJECTIVES

Infants awaiting paediatric heart transplantation (PHT) experience long waitlist duration and high mortality due to donor shortage. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we explored if increasing donor-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) >2.0 (recommended cutoff) was associated with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2020, 1392 infants received PHT. We divided cohort into 3 groups: A (DRWR ≤1.0, n = 239, 17%), B (DRWR 1.0-2.0, n = 947, 68%), C (DRWR >2.0, n = 206, 15%). Group characteristics and PHT outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

DRWR ranged between 0.5 and 4.1. Underlying pathology (congenital versus cardiomyopathy), gender, race, renal function and mechanical circulatory support were comparable between groups. Group C patients were more likely to be ventilated, to receive ABO blood group (ABO)-incompatible heart and to have longer donor ischaemic time. Waitlist duration was significantly shorter for group C (33 vs 50 days, P < 0.1). Early outcomes for groups A, B and C were the following (respectively): operative death (6%, 4%, 3%, P = 0.29), primary graft dysfunction (5%, 3%, 3%, P = 0.30), renal failure (10%, 7%, 7%, P = 0.42) and stroke (3%, 4%, 1%, P = 0.36). The DRWR group was not associated with operative death in either congenital (odds ratio (OR) = 0.819, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.523-1.282) or cardiomyopathy (OR = 1.221, 95% CI = 0.780-1.912) patients and only significant factor was pre-PHT extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR = 4.400, 95% CI = 2.761-7.010). Additionally, survival at 1 year (87%, 87%, 85%, P = 0.80) and 5 years (76%, 78%, 77%, P = 0.80) was comparable between the DRWR groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants who received PHT with DRWR >2.0, up to 4.1, experienced shorter waitlist duration with no demonstrable increase in peri-transplant complications, operative or late mortality. Historic practice to avoid DRWR > 2.0 due to complications (e.g. hypertension-related stroke, graft dysfunction, death) is not currently supported in infants and stretching DRWR acceptance criteria would decrease PHT waitlist duration and potentially improve waitlist complications and mortality.

Effect of ischemic time on pediatric heart transplantation outcomes: is it the same for all allografts?

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that the optimal ischemia time (IT) threshold in pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) is up to 4 h, independent of other donor organ factors. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IT and donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and study their impact on PHT outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of PHT (<18 years) identified in UNOS between January 2000 and March 2020. Post-transplantation survival analysis of patients receiving donor hearts with IT<4, 4-6, and >6 h was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cohort was divided according to donor LVEF median value, and survival was analyzed. Cox regression was performed.

RESULTS

Median LVEF was 65% in the study cohort (6669 PHT). Overall, IT>6 h was associated with worse survival compared to <4 h regardless of donor LVEF. For allografts with LVEF < 65%, IT = 4-6 h was associated with worse survival compared with IT < 4 h (p = .006) but had similar survival compared with IT > 6 h (p = .315). For allografts with LVEF ≥ 65%, IT = 4-6 h had similar survival compared with <4 h (p = .175) but improved survival compared with >6 h (p = .003). After adjusting for donor and recipient variables, Cox regression showed that IT = 4-6 h was not associated with increased mortality for LVEF ≥ 65%.

CONCLUSIONS

The IT threshold of 4 h does not apply to all allografts. Recipients of hearts with LVEF≥65% can tolerate an IT up to 6 h without any detriment to survival. Routine acceptance of these donor hearts could mitigate longer waiting times and poor donor availability for many candidates.

External validation and comparison of risk score models in pediatric heart transplants

BACKGROUND

Pediatric heart transplant (PHT) patients have the highest waitlist mortality of solid organ transplants, yet more than 40% of viable hearts are unutilized. A tool for risk prediction could impact these outcomes. This study aimed to compare and validate the PHT risk score models (RSMs) in the literature.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed to identify RSMs published. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was used to validate the published models identified in a pediatric cohort (<18 years) transplanted between 2017 and 2019 and compared against the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 2021 model. Primary outcome was post-transplant 1-year mortality. Odds ratios were obtained to evaluate the association between risk score groups and 1-year mortality. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the RSM scores on their goodness-of-fit, using Delong's test.

RESULTS

Six recipient and one donor RSMs published between 2008 and 2021 were included in the analysis. The validation cohort included 1,003 PHT. Low-risk groups had a significantly better survival than high-risk groups as predicted by Choudhry (OR = 4.59, 95% CI [2.36-8.93]) and Fraser III (3.17 [1.43-7.05]) models. Choudhry's and SRTR models achieved the best overall performance (AUC = 0.69 and 0.68, respectively). When adjusted for CHD and ventricular assist device support, all models reported better predictability [AUC > 0.6]. Choudhry (AUC = 0.69) and SRTR (AUC = 0.71) remained the best predicting RSMs even after adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Although the RSMs by SRTR and Choudhry provided the best prediction for 1-year mortality, none demonstrated a strong (AUC ≥ 0.8) concordance statistic. All published studies lacked advanced analytical approaches and were derived from an inherently limited dataset.