Italian expert-based recommendations on the use of photo(chemo)therapy in the management of mycosis fungoides: Results of an e-Delphi consensus

Skin-directed therapy and biologic response modifiers in mycosis fungoides

The most common and widespread type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is mycosis fungoides (MF), and it has a multiphasic clinical and biological course, with early stages being indolent for many years and later stages being faster and more aggressive. The clinical stage has a significant impact on the management and course of treatment: in the early stages, skin-directed therapies (SDT) plus/or biologic response modifiers (BRM); in the later stages, radiotherapy and/or systemic therapies. Even though national and international societies and groups periodically update their clinical recommendations, there is still no universally accepted approach. This paper reviews and discusses the various SDT and BRM options, either separately or in combination.

Phototherapy and mycosis fungoides: what's new?

The most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, mycosis fungoides (MF), is clinically characterized by erythematous-violaceous nodules and erythematous-scaly patches. In the early stages of MF, phototherapy is currently the first line of treatment and plays a significant role. This study aims to review and analyze the various phototherapy options for cutaneous lymphoma.

Secondary lymphomas of the skin

Infection of the skin may be the result of an underlying disease, or lymphoma may be the primary cause. As a result, it is possible to differentiate between two types of lymphomas: primary cutaneous lymphoma and secondary cutaneous lymphoma (SCL), which is a type of systemic lymphoma that also affects the skin. The objective of the current review is to examine what is currently known about this neglected subject. Following this, SCL was examined from a clinical, histological, and survival perspective.

Advances in the pharmacological management of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Current treatment guidelines for cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) advocate a stage-driven approach, considering clinical presentation, symptom burden, and patient comorbidities. Therapy selection hinges on factors like disease subtype, severity, and treatment availability. The primary goal is to enhance the quality of life by mitigating symptoms, as achieving lasting complete remission is infrequent.

AREAS COVERED

Over the past decade (2013-2023), the therapeutic landscape of CTCL has experienced substantial transformation with the introduction of innovative therapies. This review explores the main pivotal developments in traditional treatment schedules and recently introduced drugs, aiming to offer clinicians and researchers a thorough perspective on the decade's progress in the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the progress made in CTCL therapeutics, ranging from topical chemotherapeutics to immunomodulatory agents, several unmet needs persist. Firstly, there is a pressing need for the incorporation of readily available predictors for treatment response, encompassing clinical, pathological, and molecular features. Secondly, a more profound comprehension of the tumor microenvironment is imperative to optimize the landscape of targetable molecules. Lastly, the undertaking of studies on combination regimens should be encouraged as it enhances therapy efficacies by synergistically combining agents with diverse modes of action.

Carcinogenic risk in patients treated with UVA-1 phototherapy: A 5-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

UVA-1 phototherapy was first used to treat atopic dermatitis and afterwards to several other skin diseases. The contribution of UVA-1 in human photocarcinogenesis, skin photoaging, immune suppression, and hyperpigmentation is now well established. The actual contribution of UVA-1 radiation to the development of malignant melanoma (MM) in humans cannot be excluded.

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the risk of developing skin cancers (non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) and MM) in patients treated with UVA-1 phototherapy with a 5-year dermatological follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 31 patients with morphea and atopic dermatitis treated with medium dose UVA-1 phototherapy (34 J/cm2). All enrolled patients underwent an oncologic prevention visit annually with a 5-year follow-up with clinical evaluation of the entire skin surface.

RESULTS

During the 5-year follow-up, we recorded a case of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the cervical region and one case of MM on the back (pT1a). In both cases, the patients were female and affected by morphea. The Glogau 3 group is prevalent (42%), which is consistent with moderate to severe aging; the data appear to be compatible with the age.

CONCLUSIONS

This study attests that medium-dose UVA-1 phototherapy does not increase the risk of developing skin tumors and that UVA-1 phototherapy is not a worsening factor of facial photoaging. The main limitation of the study is the small sample size, avoiding to obtain statistically significant values. It was not possible to analyze individually the actual daily sun exposure during the 5-year observation period and to correlate it in terms of time and tumor development. Further studies with large sample sizes will be needed to confirm our data. Our study reaffirms how the dermatological examination performed annually is essential in the follow-up of patients undergoing this type of therapy.

Long-term proactive management of psoriasis with calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate foam: an Italian consensus through a combined nominal group technique and Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

Although long-term management of psoriasis is paramount, this approach is challenging in clinical practice. In the recent PSO-LONG trial, a fixed-dose combination of betamethasone dipropionate (BD) and calcipotriol (Cal) foam applied twice a week on non-consecutive days for 52 weeks (proactive treatment) reduced the risk of relapse. However, the role of Cal/BD foam in the long-term management of psoriasis needs further clarifications. The ProActive Management (PAM) program, a nationwide Italian project, aims at reaching a consensus on the role of proactive management of psoriasis.

METHODS

A steering committee generated some statements through the nominal group technique (NGT). The statements were voted by an expert panel in an adapted Delphi voting process.

RESULTS

Eighteen statements were proposed, and the majority of them (14/18) reached a consensus during the Delphi voting. The need to provide long-term proactive topical treatment to reduce the risk of relapse for the treatment of challenging diseases sites or in patients where phototherapy or systemic therapies are contraindicated/ineffective was widely recognized. A consensus was reached about the possibility to associate the proactive treatment with systemic and biological therapies, without the need for dose intensification, thus favoring a prolonged remission. Moreover, the proactive treatment was recognized as more effective than weekend therapy in increasing time free from relapses. Approaches to improve adherence, on the other hand, need further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion in guidelines of a proactive strategy among the effective treatment options will be a fundamental step in the evolution of a mild-moderate psoriasis therapeutic approach.