Serum markers of pulmonary epithelial damage in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease and disease progression

Diagnostic performance of specific biomarkers for interstitial lung disease: a single center study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) in the evaluation and management of interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

Serum KL-6, SP-A, SP-D levels were measured in 122 unique consecutive patients referred for connective tissue disease (CTD) associated ILD (CTD-ILD) autoantibodies and 120 "healthy" controls. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed and categorized as ILD and non-ILD or CTD-ILD and other ILD. All biomarkers were evaluated for diagnosis and moderate vs. severe ILD based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

RESULTS

ILD was diagnosed in 52 % (n=64) and non-ILD in 48 % (n=58). ILD patients were categorized as other ILD (61 %, n=39) or CTD-ILD (39 %, n=25). Patients with ILD had significantly elevated levels of SP-A (p<0.02), KL-6 or SP-D (both p<0.0001) when compared to those with non-ILD. The mean levels of all biomarkers were significantly elevated levels in the ILD compared to non-ILD group (p<0.0001). No significant difference in biomarker levels between CTD-ILD and other ILD groups (p≥0.900). Biomarkers had comparable specificities (89-93 %) however; sensitivities were variable at 75 , 77 and 17 % for KL-6, SP-D and SP-A, respectively. Combination of KL-6 and SP-D yielded comparable diagnostic accuracy to all biomarkers with median levels significantly higher in patients with severe vs. mild disease.

CONCLUSIONS

KL-6 and SP-D levels are elevated in ILD and therefore contribute to the diagnosis and risk stratification for patient management.

Poor prognostic factors for relapse of interstitial lung disease in microscopic polyangiitis: the Japanese multicentre REVEAL cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated poor prognostic factors for the relapse of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) after remission induction therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled patients diagnosed with MPA complicated by ILD according to the Chapel Hill Consensus definition from 2001 to 2023 in multiple institutions in the REVEAL cohort. All patients who were treated with immunosuppressive therapy were followed up, and those who relapsed with ILD were extracted in this study. We explored the risk factors for predicting ILD relapse in patients with MPA-ILD by comparing the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings and treatments between the relapsed and non-relapsed groups on admission.

RESULTS

Of 243 patients with MPA, 134 (55.1%) with MPA-ILD were enrolled. Among them, 28 (20.9%) relapsed during a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. The initial serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) levels and the prevalence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern were significantly higher in the relapsed group. The biomarkers were also risk factors for relapse in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The best cut-off values of KL-6, SP-D for predicting ILD relapse were 430 U/mL and 89.5 ng/mL, respectively. We created prediction models based on the best cut-off values for KL-6, SP-D, and the presence of the UIP pattern (KSU model). The 10-year relapse rate was significantly different among patients with MPA-ILD stratified by the number of risk factors based on the KSU model. A higher relapse rate was associated with higher all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial serum high KL-6 and SP-D levels and the prevalence of the UIP pattern were associated with ILD relapse in patients with MPA-ILD. Our multicentre cohort study indicated that the KSU model, which consists of KL-6 ≥ 430 U/mL, SP-D ≥ 89.5 ng/mL, and the presence of the UIP pattern, is a useful predictor of ILD relapse in patients with MPA after immunosuppressive therapy.

Research progress of KL-6 in respiratory system diseases

This article comprehensively elucidates the discovery of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), its structural features, functional mechanisms, and the current research status in various respiratory system diseases. Discovered in 1985, KL-6 was initially considered a tumor marker, but its elevated levels in interstitial lung disease (ILD) led to its recognition as a relevant serum marker for ILD. KL-6 is primarily produced by type 2 alveolar epithelial cell regeneration. Over the past 30 years since the discovery of KL-6, the number of related research papers has steadily increased annually. Following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been a sudden surge in relevant literature. Despite KL-6's potential as a biomarker, its value in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis varies across different respiratory diseases, including ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), COVID-19, and lung cancer. Therefore, as an important serum biomarker in respiratory system diseases, the value of KL-6 still requires further investigation.

A narrative review on lung injury: mechanisms, biomarkers, and monitoring

Lung injury is closely associated with the heterogeneity, severity, mortality, and prognosis of various respiratory diseases. Effective monitoring of lung injury is crucial for the optimal management and improved outcomes of patients with lung diseases. This review describes acute and chronic respiratory diseases characterized by significant lung injury and current clinical tools for assessing lung health. Furthermore, we summarized the mechanisms of lung cell death observed in these diseases and highlighted recently identified biomarkers in the plasma indicative of injury to specific cell types and scaffold structure in the lung. Last, we propose an artificial intelligence-driven lung injury monitoring model to assess disease severity, and predict mortality and prognosis, aiming to achieve precision and personalized medicine.

Krebs von den Lungen-6 as biomarker of the new progressive fibrotic phenotype of interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Novel progressive fibrotic phenotype has recently been proposed characterized by progressive and inexorable worsening of the disease. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) has been proposed as fibrotic-ILD biomarker. We aimed to assess the role of KL-6 in fibrotic-ILD and the progressive phenotype in accordance with serial serum KL-6.

METHODS

107 patients were enrolled in the study (median age,IQR, 65(54-71)y/o) followed at respiratory diseases and rheumatology units of University of Siena. Thirty-five had diagnoses of IPF, 18 sarcoidosis, 10 PLCH, 5 LAM, 24 fibrotic HP(fHP), 13 RA (4/13 RA-ILD) and 22 SSc (18/22 SSc-ILD). Serial serum samples were collected before therapy (t0) and 24 months later (t1) from IPF, SSc- and RA-ILD patients. Twenty-two healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. Serum samples were assayed for KL-6 concentrations (Fujirebio Europe, Gent, Belgium).

RESULTS

Higher KL-6 concentrations were reported in IPF, fHP and SSc-ILD patients than HC (p<0.0001). KL-6 cut-off value of 885 U/mL identified fibrotic-ILD patients. Logistic regression analysis indicated KL-6 (p=0.004) and smoking-habit (p=0.005) affected the ILD diagnosis. The decision tree model showed KL-6>1145 U/mL, DLco≤60.15 %, FVC≤86 % to classify 86 % IPF patients. Inverse correlation between T0-KL-6 and T1-FVC%(r=-0.314, p=0.046) and T1-DLco%(r=-0.327, p=0.038) in the progressive group.

CONCLUSION

KL-6 proved to be a reliable marker for diagnosis and prognosis of fibrotic ILD patients with predictive value in progressive fibrotic patients and a useful marker to identify the new and similar progressive phenotype of IPF and SSc-ILD patients assessing the functional progression in accordance with serial serum KL-6 measurements.

Serum YKL-40 and Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 as Potential Predictive Biomarkers for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the role of blood biomarkers in RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is ill-defined. We aim to evaluate the role of YKL-40 and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) in the diagnosis and severity evaluation of RA-ILD.

METHODS

45 RA-non-ILD patients and 38 RA-ILD patients were included. The clinical data and the levels of YKL-40 and KL-6 were measured and collected for all patients. The risk factors for RA-ILD were analyzed and their correlation with relevant indicators and predictive value for RA-ILD was explored.

RESULTS

The levels of YKL-40 and KL-6 in RA-ILD patients were higher than RA-non-ILD patients (p < .001). Both YKL-40 and KL-6 were correlated with the incidence of RA-ILD. The predictive power of combined KL-6 and YKL-40 for the presence of ILD was 0.789, with a sensitivity and specificity at 73.7% and 73.3%, respectively. In RA-ILD patients, both YKL-40 and KL-6 were positively correlated with the Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) I score and negatively correlated with pulmonary function.

CONCLUSIONS

KL-6 and YKL-40 might be a useful biomarker in the diagnosis and severity evaluation of RA-ILD.

Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by a tripod combining vasculopathy, fibrosis, and immune-mediated inflammatory processes. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in SSc varies according to the methods used to detect it, ranging from 25 to 95%. The fibrotic and vascular pulmonary manifestations of SSc, particularly ILD, are the main causes of morbidity and mortality, contributing to 35% of deaths. Although early trials were conducted with cyclophosphamide, more recent randomized controlled trials have been performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of several medications, mostly mycophenolate, rituximab, tocilizumab, and nintedanib. Although many uncertainties remain, expert consensus is emerging to optimize the therapeutic management and to provide clinicians with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for patients with SSc-ILD. This article provides an overview, in the light of the latest advances, of the available evidence for the diagnosis and management of SSc-ILD.

Prevalence of the limited vs. extensive scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease at the time of diagnosis of SSc-ILD based on Goh et al. criteria. Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Goh et al. proposed in 2008 a classificatory algorithm of limited or extensive SSc-ILD. The prevalence of both at the time of diagnosis of SSc-ILD is not known with exactitude.

METHODS

The review was undertaken by means of MEDLINE and SCOPUS from 2008 to 2023 and using the terms: "systemic", "scleroderma" or "interstitial lung disease" [MesH]. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for the qualifying assessment for observational studies and the Jadad scale for clinical trials. The inverse variance-weighted method was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were initially included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA). Of these, 17 studies had no overlapping data. They reported data from 2,149 patients, 1,369 (81.2%) were female. The mean age was 52.4 (SD 6.6) years. 45.2% of the patients had the diffuse subtype and 54.8% had the limited or sine scleroderma subtype. A total of 38.7% of the patients showed positive antitopoisomerase antibodies (ATA) and 14.2% positive anticentromere antibodies (ACA). The mean percentage of forced vital capacity (FVC) at baseline was 80.5% (SD 6.9) and of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) was 59.1% (SD 9.6). Twelve studies presented SSc-ILD extension data adjusted for PFTs and were included in the meta-analysis. The 10 observational cohort studies were analyzed separately. The overall percentage of limited extension was estimated at 63.5% (95%CI 55.3-73; p < 0.001) using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies (I2) was 9.8% (95%CI 0-68.2%) with the random-effects model. Extensive pulmonary involvement was estimated at 34.3% (95%CI 26-45.4; p < 0.001). Heterogeneity between studies (I2) was 0% (95%CI 0-61.6%) with the random-effects model.

CONCLUSION

The overall percentage of limited SSc-ILD at the time of diagnosis of SSc-ILD was estimated at 63.5% and extensive at 34.3%.

Screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of interstitial lung disease in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A narrative review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and serious manifestation of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. While the prevalence of ILD differs among the individual autoimmune rheumatic diseases, ILD remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, primary Sjögren's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and idiopathic inflammatory myositis. The present review summarizes recent literature on autoimmune-associated ILD with a focus on screening and monitoring for ILD progression. Reflecting on the currently available evidence, the authors propose a guideline for monitoring for progression in patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune-associated ILD. This review also highlights clinical and biological predictors of progressive pulmonary fibrosis and describes opportunity for further study in the rapidly evolving area of rheumatology and pulmonology.

Treatable Traits in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic systemic disease within the spectrum of connective tissue diseases, specifically characterized by vascular abnormalities and inflammatory and fibrotic involvement of the skin and internal organs resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The clinical phenotype of SSc is heterogeneous, and serum autoantibodies together with the extent of skin involvement have a predictive value in the risk stratification. Current recommendations include an organ-based management according to the predominant involvement with only limited individual factors included in the treatment algorithm. Similar to what has been proposed for other chronic diseases, we hypothesize that a "treatable trait" approach based on relevant phenotypes and endotypes could address the unmet needs in SSc stratification and treatment to maximize the outcomes. We provide herein a comprehensive review and a critical discussion of the literature regarding potential treatable traits in SSc, focusing on established and candidate biomarkers, with the purpose of setting the bases for a precision medicine-based approach. The discussion, structured based on the organ involvement, allows to conjugate the pathogenetic mechanisms of tissue injury with the proposed predictors, particularly autoantibodies and other serum biomarkers. Ultimately, we are convinced that precision medicine is the ideal guide to manage a complex condition such as SSc for which available treatments are largely unsatisfactory.

Krebs von den Lungen-6 as a Potential Predictive Biomarker in Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases

BACKGROUND

As fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (fILDs) are associated with high mortality, monitoring of disease activity under treatment is highly relevant. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is associated with the presence and severity of different fILDs, mainly in Asian patient populations.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate KL-6 as a predictive biomarker in fILDs in Caucasian patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with fILDs were recruited prospectively and serum concentrations of KL-6 were measured at baseline (BL), after 6 and 12 months (6 Months, 12 Months). Clinical characteristics including pulmonary function tests were assessed at 6-monthly visits and correlated with KL-6 BL levels as well as with KL-6 level changes.

RESULTS

A total of 47 fILD patients were included (mean age: 65 years, 68% male). KL-6 levels at BL were significantly higher in fILD patients than in healthy controls (n = 44, mean age: 45, 23% male) (ILD: 1,757 ± 1960 U/mL vs. control: 265 ± 107 U/mL, p < 0.0001). However, no differences were noted between ILD subgroups. KL-6 decreased significantly under therapy (6M∆BL-KL6: -486 ± 1,505 mean U/mL, p = 0.032; 12M∆BL-KL6: -547 ± 1,782 mean U/mL, p = 0.041) and KL-6 level changes were negatively correlated with changes in pulmonary function parameters (forced vital capacity [FVC]: r = -0.562, p < 0.0001; DLCOSB: r = -0.405, p = 0.013). While neither absolute KL-6 levels at BL nor KL-6 level changes were associated with ILD progression (FVC decline ≥10%, DLCOSB decline ≥15% or death), patients with a stable FVC showed significantly decreasing KL-6 levels (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

A decline of KL-6 under therapy correlated with a clinically relevant stabilization of lung function. Thus, KL-6 might serve as a predictive biomarker, which however must be determined by larger prospective cohorts.

Serum KL-6 levels predict clinical outcomes and are associated with MUC1 polymorphism in Japanese patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a known biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of interstitial lung diseases. However, the role of serum KL-6 and the mucin 1 (MUC1) variant (rs4072037) in COVID-19 outcomes remains to be elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the relationships among serum KL-6 levels, critical outcomes and the MUC1 variant in Japanese patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre retrospective study using data from the Japan COVID-19 Task Force collected from February 2020 to November 2021, including 2226 patients with COVID-19 whose serum KL-6 levels were measured. An optimal serum KL-6 level cut-off to predict critical outcomes was determined and used for multivariable logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, the relationship among the allele dosage of the MUC1 variant, calculated from single nucleotide polymorphism typing data of genome-wide association studies using the imputation method, serum KL-6 levels and COVID-19 critical outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

Serum KL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with COVID-19 with critical outcomes (511±442 U/mL) than those without (279±204 U/mL) (p<0.001). Serum KL-6 levels ≥304 U/mL independently predicted critical outcomes (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.47, 95% CI 2.44 to 4.95). Moreover, multivariable logistic regression analysis with age and sex indicated that the MUC1 variant was independently associated with increased serum KL-6 levels (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.32) but not significantly associated with critical outcomes (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.54).

CONCLUSION

Serum KL-6 levels predicted critical outcomes in Japanese patients with COVID-19 and were associated with the MUC1 variant. Therefore, serum KL-6 level is a potentially useful biomarker of critical COVID-19 outcomes.

State-of-the-art evidence in the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease with multi-organ involvement, fibrosis and vasculopathy. Treatment in SSc, including early diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and the use of organ-specific therapies, has improved, as evident from randomized clinical trials. Treatments for early dcSSc include immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and tocilizumab. Patients with rapidly progressive early dcSSc might be eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which can improve survival. Morbidity from interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension is improving with the use of proven therapies. Mycophenolate mofetil has surpassed cyclophosphamide as the initial treatment for SSc-interstitial lung disease. Nintedanib and possibly perfinidone can be considered in SSc pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is frequently treated with initial combination therapy (for example, with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists) and, if necessary, the addition of a prostacyclin analogue. Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers are treated with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (especially nifedipine), then phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intravenous iloprost. Bosentan can reduce the development of new digital ulcers. Trial data for other manifestations are mostly lacking. Research is needed to develop targeted and highly effective treatments, best practices for organ-specific screening and early intervention, and sensitive outcome measurements.

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) as a diagnostic marker for pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a respiratory disease with end-stage pathological changes of interstitial lung disease that severely affects the survival of patients. Among the many biomarkers that have been identified, serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is by far the most frequent marker for detecting pulmonary fibrosis.

METHODS

We searched Medline (Pubmed), Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane databases for articles published between inception and August 2022 in order to explore the association between KL-6 and pulmonary fibrosis. Characteristics of patients and studies included in the articles were extracted by two independent investigators according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We reflected the accuracy of KL-6 in distinguishing between PF and non-PF by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and area under the curve by SROC curves. The presence of heterogeneity was reflected by I² in the forest plot, and then the source of heterogeneity was investigated by meta-regression.

RESULTS

We searched for 939 research papers, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.78-0.92), specificity of 0.91 (95 % CI: 0.86-0.95), positive likelihood ratio of 10.2 (95 % CI: 6.1, 17.0) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.14 (95 % CI: 0.08, 0.25) for KL-6 in diagnosing pulmonary fibrosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.93-0.97). The results showed significant heterogeneity in both sensitivity and specificity (I² = 94.55 and 91.52, respectively). Meta-regression analysis identified race as the cause of sensitivity heterogeneity and assay methodology as the cause of specificity heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of this study suggests that serum KL-6 is a better tool for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis when factors such as disease cause and control group category are not specifically considered.

Serum KL-6 as a Biomarker of Progression at Any Time in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

The development of a progressive phenotype of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is still unpredictable. Whereas tools to predict mortality in ILD exist, scores to predict disease progression are missing. The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline serum KL-6 as an established marker to assess disease activity in ILD, alone or in combination with clinical variables, could improve stratification of ILD patients according to progression risk at any time. Consecutive patients with fibrotic ILD, followed at our institution between 2008 and 2015, were investigated. Disease progression was defined as relative decline of ≥10% in forced vital capacity (FVC) or ≥15% in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco)% from baseline at any time. Serum KL-6 was measured using an automated immunoassay (Fujirebio Europe, Gent, Belgium). A stepwise logistic regression was performed to select variables to be included in the score. A total of 205 patients (49% idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 51% fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)) were included, of them 113 (55%) developed disease progression during follow up. Male gender (G) and serum KL-6 strata (K) were significant predictors of progression at regression analysis and were included in the GK score. A threshold of 2 GK score points was best for discriminating patients at high risk versus low risk to develop disease progression at any time. Serum KL-6 concentration, alone or combined in a simple score with gender, allows an effective stratification of ILD patients for risk of disease progression at any time.

Blood Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels predict treatment response to antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Antifibrotic therapy can slow disease progression (DP) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the prognostic biomarkers for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy have not been identified. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy.

METHODS

The clinical data of 188 patients with IPF who initiated antifibrotic therapy at three tertiary hospitals was retrospectively analyzed. DP was defined as a relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 10%, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≥ 15%, acute exacerbation, or deaths during 6 months after antifibrotic therapy.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 68.9 years, 77.7% were male, and DP occurred in 43 patients (22.9%) during follow-up (median, 7.6 months; interquartile range, 6.2-9.8 months). There was no difference in baseline KL-6 levels between the DP and no-DP groups; however, among patients with high baseline KL-6 levels (≥ 500 U/mL), changes in KL-6 levels over 1 month were higher in the DP group than those in the non-DP group, and higher relative changes in KL-6 over 1 month were independently associated with DP (odds ratio, 1.043; 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.084) in the multivariable logistic analysis adjusted for age and FVC. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the 1-month change in KL-6 was also useful for predicting DP (area under the curve = 0.707; P < 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the relative change in KL-6 over 1 month might be useful for predicting DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy when baseline KL6 is high.

Krebs von den lungen-6 as a clinical marker for hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis

Aim

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), also referred to as exogenous allergic alveolitis, is one of the most common interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). A potential immune biomarker, Krebs von den lgen-6 (KL-6) characterizes the progression and severity of HP. The meta-analysis in this study was conducted to elucidate the variations in the concentrations of KL-6 in different types of HP.

Methods

A systematic search of various databases such as EMBASE, Pubmed, CNKI, VIP, Web of Science, and WanFang was carried out to find relevant published articles between January 1980 and August 2022 that explored the relationship between KL-6 and allergic pneumonia. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect sizes for comparison among different groups. The GSE47460 and GSE150910 datasets were downloaded to extract and validate the differences in KL-6 mRNA expression between HP lung tissue and healthy controls. Furthermore, the single-cell sequencing dataset GSE135893 was downloaded to extract KL-6 mRNA expression in type II alveolar epithelial cells to validate the differences between HP and healthy controls. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the included studies by employing Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. All the qualified studies were subjected to statistical analyses carried out utilizing RevMan 5.2, Stata 11.0, and R software 4.1.3.

Results

Twenty studies aligned perfectly with the inclusion criteria of the meta. The concentrations of KL-6 were substantially higher in the blood of HP patients as compared to the control group. Subgroup analyses were carried out in accordance with the allergen source and the results revealed that patients with different allergens had higher blood KL-6 concentrations than healthy controls. Additionally, different subgroups of subjects were created for meta-analysis as per the fibrosis status, race, measurement method, and sample type. The concentration of KL-6 in blood was much higher in all HP subgroups than in healthy control groups. Moreover, the bioinformatics analysis revealed that KL-6 mRNA expression was higher in HP lung tissue and type II alveolar epithelial cells as compared to healthy controls.

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis suggested that the concentration levels of KL-6 varied between HP patients and healthy individuals, and the KL-6 concentrations may be higher in the blood samples of HP patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42022355334.

Biomarkers in Systemic Sclerosis Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD)

Purpose of Review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of mortality in systemic sclerosis, a rare autoimmune disease characterised by fibrosis and vasculopathy. The variety of phenotypes in SSc-ILD have inspired multiple studies aimed at the identification of biomarkers which can provide disease-specific information but due to the complex pathogenesis of SSc-ILD, it has been challenging to validate such markers. We provide a comprehensive update on those most studied along with emerging biomarkers.

Recent Findings

We review the up-to-date findings with regard to the use of well-studied molecular biomarkers in SSc-ILD along with novel biomarkers offering promise as prognostic markers such as IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-7, the adipokine CTRP9, endothelial progenitor cells, and cellular markers such as CD21lo/neg B cells. Expression profiling data is being used in SSc patients to determine genetic and epigenetic clusters which shed further light on mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of SSc-ILD and are likely to uncover novel biomarkers.

Summary

With the exception of autoantibodies, there are no routinely measured biomarkers in SSc-ILD and reliable validation of the many potential biomarkers is lacking. Identifying biomarkers which can offer diagnostic and prognostic certainty may help patients to receive preventative treatment as part of a personalised medicine approach.

CYFRA 21-1 Predicts Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Prospective Longitudinal Analysis of the PROFILE Cohort

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and inevitably fatal condition for which there are a lack of effective biomarkers to guide therapeutic decision making. Objectives: To determine the relationship between serum concentrations of the cytokeratin fragment CYFRA 21-1 and disease progression and mortality in individuals with IPF enrolled in the Prospective Observation of Fibrosis in the Lung Clinical Endpoints (PROFILE) study. Methods: CYFRA 21-1 was identified by immunohistochemistry in samples of human lung obtained at surgery. Concentrations of CYFRA 21-1 were measured using an ELISA-based assay in serum samples collected at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months from 491 individuals with an incident diagnosis of IPF who were enrolled in the PROFILE study and from 100 control subjects at baseline. Study subjects were followed for a minimum of 3 years after their first blood draw. Measurements and Main Results: CYFRA 21-1 localizes to hyperplastic epithelium in IPF lung tissue. Peripheral CYFRA 21-1 concentrations were significantly higher in subjects with IPF than in healthy control subjects in both the discovery (n = 132) (control: 0.96 ± 0.81 ng/ml; vs. IPF: 2.34 ± 2.15 ng/ml; P < 0.0001) and validation (n = 359) (control: 2.21 ± 1.54 ng/ml; and IPF: 4.13 ± 2.77 ng/ml; P < 0.0001) cohorts. Baseline concentrations of CYFRA 21-1 were able to distinguish individuals at risk of 12-month disease progression (C-statistic, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.79; P < 0.0001) and were predictive of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.19] per 1 ng/ml increase in CYFRA 21-1; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, 3-month change in concentrations of CYFRA 21-1 separately predicted 12-month and overall survival in both the discovery and validation cohorts. Conclusions: CYFRA 21-1, a marker of epithelial damage and turnover, has the potential to be an important prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in individuals with IPF.

Contemporary Concise Review 2021: Interstitial lung disease

The last 2 years have presented previously unforeseen challenges in pulmonary medicine. Despite the significant impact of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic on patients, clinicians and communities, advances in the care and understanding of interstitial lung disease (ILD) continued unabated. Recent studies have led to improved guidelines, better understanding of the role for antifibrotics in fibrosing ILDs, prognostic indicators and novel biomarkers. In this concise contemporary review, we summarize many of the important studies published in 2021, highlighting their relevance and impact to the management and knowledge of ILD.

KL-6 in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Patients with and without ILD: A Machine Learning Approach

Simple Summary

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a mucin involved in several cellular processes, and its expression increases following injured or regenerating type II pneumocyte. KL-6 was suggested to identify patients affected by fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILD) associated with rheumatologic disorders. This is the first study that has assessed whether serum KL-6 can distinguish ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients with ILD from those without ILD, and whether this biomarker and its changes over time are correlated with disease activity, vasculitic damage, and response to treatment. Thirteen AAV patients were enrolled, four of them with ILD. Higher serum KL-6 was found in AAV-ILD patients in comparison with those without ILD. The best KL-6 cutoff values of 368 U/mL and 301 U/mL at baseline and during follow-up, respectively, were suggested to distinguish the two groups. A direct correlation was found between serum KL-6 and disease activity. Our multicenter study demonstrated KL-6 as a reliable, non-invasive, and easy-to-perform marker of ILD in AAV patients, being helpful for disease activity assessment. Changes in serum concentrations of KL-6 over time could be useful for monitoring AAV patients. Further study of KL-6 as a marker of response to therapy during long-term follow-up would also be worthwhile.

Abstract

Background: ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) are small vessel vasculitis distinguished between microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). The former may have interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with high morbidity and mortality. Here, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), a marker of fibrotic ILD, was assessed for distinguishing AAV patients with ILD from those without ILD, and whether its changes over time are correlated with disease activity. Materials and Methods: Thirteen AAV patients (eight females, mean age 61 ± 14.8 years) were enrolled: six MPA and six GPA. Serum samples were assayed for KL-6 concentrations (Fujirebio Europe, Belgium). To investigate potential binary classifiers for diagnosis of AAV-ILD, we constructed a regression decision tree model. Results: Higher serum KL-6 were in AAV-ILD compared with those without ILD (972.8 ± 398.5 vs 305.4 ± 93.9, p = 0.0040). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve showed 100% of the diagnostic performance of KL-6 for identifying the ILD involvement (accuracy 91.7%) and the best cutoff value of 368 U/mL (sensitivity 100% and specificity 87.5%). The decision tree model showed a 33% improvement in class purity using a cut-off value of 513 U/mL to distinguish AAV patients with and without ILD. Stratifying AAV patients as MPA and GPA with and without ILD considering T0 and T1 KL-6, the model obtained an improvement of 40% for classifying GPA non-ILD with a T0 serum KL-6 cut-off value of 513 U/mL and a T1 KL-6 cut-off of 301 U/mL. A direct correlation was found between serum T0 KL-6 and T0 BVAS (r = 0.578, p = 0.044). Conclusion: Our multicenter study demonstrated KL-6 as a reliable, non-invasive, and easy-to-perform marker of ILD in AAV patients and its helpfulness for disease activity assessment. Changes in serum concentrations of KL-6 over time could be useful for monitoring AAV patients. Further study of KL-6 as a marker of response to therapy during long-term follow-up would also be worthwhile.

Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: How to Incorporate Two Food and Drug Administration-Approved Therapies in Clinical Practice

Systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) has the highest individual mortality of all rheumatic diseases, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is among the leading causes of SSc-related death. Two drugs are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and indicated for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in patients with SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD): nintedanib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and tocilizumab (the first biologic agent targeting the interleukin-6 pathway in SSc). In addition, 2 generic drugs with cytotoxic and immunoregulatory activity, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide, have shown comparable efficacy in a phase II trial but are not FDA-approved for SSc-ILD. In light of the heterogeneity of the disease, the optimal therapeutic strategy for the management of SSc-ILD is still to be determined. The objectives of this review are 2-fold: 1) review the body of research focused on the diagnosis and treatment of SSc-ILD; and 2) propose a practical approach for diagnosis, stratification, management, and therapeutic decision-making in this clinical context. This review presents a practical classification of SSc patients in terms of disease severity (subclinical versus clinical ILD) and associated risk of progression (low versus high risk). The pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for first- and second-line therapy, as well as potential combination approaches, are discussed in light of the recent approval of tocilizumab for SSc-ILD.

KL-6 as an Immunological Biomarker Predicts the Severity, Progression, Acute Exacerbation, and Poor Outcomes of Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Object

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a specific form of chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia with various etiology. The severity and progression of ILD usually predict the poor outcomes of ILD. Otherwise, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a potential immunological biomarker reflecting the severity and progression of ILD. This meta-analysis is to clarify the predictive value of elevated KL-6 levels in ILD.

Method

EBSCO, PubMed, and Cochrane were systematically searched for articles exploring the prognosis of ILD published between January 1980 and April 2021. The Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were computed as the effect sizes for comparisons between groups. For the relationship between adverse outcome and elevated KL-6 concentration, Hazard Ratio (HR), and its 95%CI were used to estimate the risk factor of ILD.

Result

Our result showed that ILD patients in severe and progressive groups had higher KL-6 levels, and the KL-6 level of patients in the severe ILD was 703.41 (U/ml) than in mild ILD. The KL-6 level in progressive ILD group was 325.98 (U/ml) higher than that in the non-progressive ILD group. Secondly, the KL-6 level of patients in acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD was 545.44 (U/ml) higher than stable ILD. Lastly, the higher KL-6 level in ILD patients predicted poor outcomes. The KL-6 level in death of ILD was 383.53 (U/ml) higher than in survivors of ILD. The pooled HR (95%CI) about elevated KL-6 level predicting the mortality of ILD was 2.05 (1.50–2.78), and the HR (95%CI) for progression of ILD was 1.98 (1.07–3.67).

Conclusion

The elevated KL-6 level indicated more severe, more progressive, and predicted the higher mortality and poor outcomes of ILD.

Role of MUC1 rs4072037 polymorphism and serum KL-6 levels in patients with antisynthetase syndrome

Mucin 1/Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is proposed as a serum biomarker of several interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), including connective tissue disorders associated with ILD. However, it has not been studied in a large cohort of Caucasian antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD) patients. Consequently, we assessed the role of MUC1 rs4072037 and serum KL-6 levels as a potential biomarker of ASSD susceptibility and for the differential diagnosis between patients with ILD associated with ASSD (ASSD-ILD +) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). 168 ASSD patients (149 ASSD-ILD +), 174 IPF patients and 523 healthy controls were genotyped for MUC1 rs4072037 T > C. Serum KL-6 levels were determined in a subgroup of individuals. A significant increase of MUC1 rs4072037 CC genotype and C allele frequencies was observed in ASSD patients compared to healthy controls. Likewise, MUC1 rs4072037 TC and CC genotypes and C allele frequencies were significantly different between ASSD-ILD+ and IPF patients. Additionally, serum KL-6 levels were significantly higher in ASSD patients compared to healthy controls. Nevertheless, no differences in serum KL-6 levels were found between ASSD-ILD+ and IPF patients. Our results suggest that the presence of MUC1 rs4072037 C allele increases the risk of ASSD and it could be a useful genetic biomarker for the differential diagnosis between ASSD-ILD+ and IPF patients.

High-Resolution Computed Tomography: Lights and Shadows in Improving Care for SSc-ILD Patients

The diagnosis and classification of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is essential to improve the prognosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. The risk-stratification of disease severity and follow-up requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating high-resolution computed tomography (HRTC) of the lung, pulmonary function tests (PFT), along with clinical and symptomatic evaluations. The use of HRCT in detecting SSc-ILD is not so much based on a definitive validation, but rather reflects the widespread clinician recognition of dissatisfaction with other modalities. However, due to the heterogeneity of SSc-ILD and the potential absence of symptoms in early or mild disease, it is prudent to consider as many parameters as possible in the assessment and monitoring of newly diagnosed patients. An early diagnosis meets the primary goal, i.e., the prevention of disease progression. The current first line treatment regimens are mainly centered on immunosuppressive therapy. This review assesses the role HRCT plays in optimizing care and improving clinical outcomes in SSc-ILD patients.

Contemporary Concise Review 2020: Interstitial lung disease

The year 2020 was one like no other, as we witnessed the far-reaching impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) global pandemic. Yet despite an unprecedented and challenging year, global research in interstitial lung disease (ILD) continued to break new grounds. Research progress has led to an improved understanding in new diagnostic tools and potential biomarkers for ILD. Studies on the role of antifibrotic therapies, newer therapeutic agents, supportive care strategies and the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continue to reshape the management landscape of ILD. In this concise review, we aim to summarize the key studies published in 2020, highlighting their impact on the various aspects of ILD.

Krebs Von den Lungen-6 as a predictive indicator for the risk of secondary pulmonary fibrosis and its reversibility in COVID-19 patients

Dysregulated immune response and abnormal repairment could cause secondary pulmonary fibrosis of varying severity in COVID-19, especially for the elders. The Krebs Von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) as a sensitive marker reflects the degree of fibrosis and this study will focus on analyzing the evaluative efficacy and predictive role of KL-6 in COVID-19 secondary pulmonary fibrosis. The study lasted more than three months and included total 289 COVID-19 patients who were divided into moderate (n=226) and severe groups (n=63) according to the severity of illness. Clinical information such as inflammation indicators, radiological results and lung function tests were collected. The time points of nucleic acid test were also recorded. Furthermore, based on Chest radiology detection, it was identified that 80 (27.7%) patients developed reversible pulmonary fibrosis and 34 (11.8%) patients developed irreversible pulmonary fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis shows that KL-6 could diagnose the severity of COVID-19 (AUC=0.862) and predict the occurrence of pulmonary fibrosis (AUC = 0.741) and irreversible pulmonary fibrosis (AUC=0.872). Importantly, the cross-correlation analysis demonstrates that KL-6 rises earlier than the development of lung radiology fibrosis, thus also illuminating the predictive function of KL-6. We set specific values (505U/mL and 674U/mL) for KL-6 in order to assess the risk of pulmonary fibrosis after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The survival curves for days in hospital show that the higher the KL-6 levels, the longer the hospital stay (P<0.0001). In conclusion, KL-6 could be used as an important predictor to evaluate the secondary pulmonary fibrosis degree for COVID-19.

Immune Stroma in Lung Cancer and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Common Biologic Landscape?

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) identifies a specific entity characterized by chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause, still lacking effective therapies. Growing evidence suggests that the biologic processes occurring in IPF recall those which orchestrate cancer onset and progression and these findings have already been exploited for therapeutic purposes. Notably, the incidence of lung cancer in patients already affected by IPF is significantly higher than expected. Recent advances in the knowledge of the cancer immune microenvironment have allowed a paradigm shift in cancer therapy. From this perspective, recent experimental reports suggest a rationale for immune checkpoint inhibition in IPF. Here, we recapitulate the most recent knowledge on lung cancer immune stroma and how it can be translated into the IPF context, with both diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Oncomarkers in IPF Patients and Serial Changes of Oncomarkers in a Prospective Italian Real-Life Case Series

Simple Summary

This paper is a review of the literature on the clinical role of oncomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) progression, and a description of the routine oncomarker trend in IPF patients over the longest follow-up yet reported. This is the first meta-analysis to review the results of studies evaluating the predictive prognostic value of circulating oncomarkers (CEA, Ca15.3, Ca19.9, Ca125, and KL-6) for IPF. The study focused on the discovery of multiple biomarker signatures, such as combinations of oncomarkers, that are widely and routinely available in biochemistry laboratories. The combination of clinical parameters and biological markers could help achieve more accurate results regarding prognosis and response to treatment in IPF. Our results could pave the way for a more “personalized” medical approach to patients affected by IPF.

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severe progressive interstitial lung disease. At 5-year follow-up, 15% of IPF patients develop lung cancer, which significantly reduces the survival rate. Here we review the literature on the clinical role of oncomarkers in IPF progression, and describe the trend of routine oncomarkers in IPF patients over the longest follow-up yet reported. Materials and methods: A systematic search of the literature in PubMed was performed to find relevant studies published up to 24 September 2020. The most common oncomarkers were chosen to select papers related to pulmonary fibrosis. Then, 24 IPF patients and 25 non-IPF patients, followed at Careggi ILD Referral Centre and Siena Regional Referral Centre for ILD, were enrolled consecutively. Results: A few studies reported an association between serum oncomarkers and severity of IPF. NSE, CEA, Ca19.9, and Ca125 were higher in the IPF, than in the non-IPF, group at every follow-up (p < 0.05). Ca15.3 concentrations were higher in the IPF, than the non-IPF, group at t3 (p = 0.0080) and t4 (p = 0.0168). To improve the specificity and sensitivity of Ca15.3, a panel of biomarkers was analyzed, with the IPF group as dependent variable, and chitotriosidase, Cyfra 21.1, Ca15.3, Ca125, and Ca19.9 as independent variables. Conclusions: This study focused on the discovery of multiple biomarker signatures, such as combinations of oncomarkers, that are widely and routinely available in biochemistry laboratories. The combination of clinical parameters and biological markers could help achieve more accurate results regarding prognosis and response to treatment in IPF. Our results could pave the way for a more “personalized” medical approach to patients affected by IPF.