1
|
Howard LM, Wilson CA, Reilly TJ, Moss KM, Mishra GD, Coupland-Smith E, Riecher-Rössler A, Seedat S, Smith S, Steinberg JR, van Ditzhuijzen J, Oram S. Women's reproductive mental health: currently available evidence and future directions for research, clinical practice and health policy. World Psychiatry 2025; 24:196-215. [PMID: 40371748 PMCID: PMC12079463 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Sex and gender differences in the epidemiology of mental disorders are well documented. Less well understood are the drivers of these differences. Reproductive health represents one of the gendered determinants of mental health that may affect women throughout their life course. In this paper, we review common reproductive events that may be associated with mental ill health, including menstruation (with premenstrual dysphoric disorder appearing for the first time in recent classifications of mental disorders), contraception, abortion, sexual dysfunction, hypersexuality, sexual violence, reproductive coercion, infertility and associated gynaecological conditions, and menopause. Such reproductive events may differentially affect women globally via a range of potential biological and psychosocial mechanisms. These include, for example, vulnerability to the physiological changes in hormone levels across the menstrual cycle; side effects of treatment of mental disorders; inflammation underpinning endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome as well as mental disorders such as depression; intersections with gender disadvantage manifesting, for example, as structural barriers in accessing menstrual products and sanitation, contraception and abortion, underscoring the broader social determinants impacting women's mental health. Greater understanding of these mechanisms is guiding the development of effective interventions, which are also reviewed here. However, key evidence gaps remain, partly as a result of the historic gender bias in mental health research, and the neglect of reproductive health in clinical practice. Furthermore, while several women's health strategies have recently been proposed internationally, they do not usually include a focus on mental health across the life course, particularly for women with severe mental illness. Integrating co-designed reproductive health interventions into primary and secondary mental health care settings, providing tailored care, increasing the evidence base on effective interventions, and empowering women to make informed choices about their reproductive health, could improve not only reproductive health but also women's mental health across the life course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise M Howard
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Claire A Wilson
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Katrina M Moss
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Gita D Mishra
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | - Soraya Seedat
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Shubulade Smith
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Julia R Steinberg
- Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Jenneke van Ditzhuijzen
- Interdisciplinary Social Science, Social Policy and Public Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sian Oram
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mahon J, van Baak C, Hayes BE. Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Health Outcomes Among Married Women in Cote D'Ivoire. Violence Against Women 2025:10778012251329365. [PMID: 40151139 DOI: 10.1177/10778012251329365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
Reproductive coercion, a form of gender-based violence, often co-occurs with intimate partner violence (IPV), potentially leading to health consequences. Relying on data from the Côte D'Ivoire Performance Monitoring for Action, we examine the association between (a) physical, sexual, and emotional IPV with reproductive coercion, and (b) IPV and reproductive coercion with health perceptions. About 5% of the sample experienced reproductive coercion in the past year. Emotional IPV and experiencing multiple types of IPV were associated with higher odds of reproductive coercion. Sexual IPV and experiencing multiple number of types of IPV were associated with negative health outcomes. Implications are discussed below.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Mahon
- School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Carlijn van Baak
- Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brittany E Hayes
- School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wood SN, Thomas HL, Guiella G, Mosso R, Gichangi P, Kibira SP, Makumbi F, Akilimali PZ, OlaOlorun FM, Omoluabi E, Decker MR. Longitudinal impact of past-year reproductive coercion on contraceptive use dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from eight population-based cohorts. EClinicalMedicine 2025; 80:103056. [PMID: 39877258 PMCID: PMC11773259 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Reproductive coercion (RC) is a type of abuse where a partner intentionally attempts to interfere with fertility through deception or violence, often by manipulating one's contraceptive use or reproductive decision-making. Cross-sectional studies on the magnitude of RC across sub-Saharan Africa have noted associations with contraceptive use. No studies have longitudinally examined RC experiences as related to future contraceptive dynamics, including discontinuation or forgoing use altogether. Methods Two rounds of longitudinal population-based cohorts across eight sites in sub-Saharan Africa, from November 2020 to January 2023, were used to prospectively examine past-year RC's impact on future contraceptive dynamics (discontinuation and switching vs. continuation for contraceptive users at baseline; adoption vs. continued non-use for contraceptive non-users at baseline) using bivariate and multivariable multinomial and logistic regression. Findings Minimal differences in women's past-year RC experiences were observed over a two-year period. In many settings, RC prevalence decreased. Only in Uganda did past-year RC increase between rounds (15.8% to 17.8%). RC's impact on contraceptive dynamics over one year differed by setting. In Burkina Faso, women with past-year RC had a three-fold increased risk of discontinuing contraception, as compared to continuing (RRR = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.28-5.42; p<0.01). In Uganda, past-year RC was marginally associated with reduced odds of contraceptive adoption, compared to continued non-use (p<0.1). Interpretation In this first longitudinal study of RC, trajectories varied across settings, as did RC's impact on contraception, affirming the importance of context. Future work should clarify RC trajectories and drivers thereof. Providers must be aware of RC leading to potential discontinuation. Contraceptive provision must be flexible and reflect women's life circumstances, including partner dynamics. Funding This work was supported, in whole, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-046501 and INV-009639]. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon N. Wood
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
- Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Haley L. Thomas
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Georges Guiella
- Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP/University of Ouagadougou), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Rosine Mosso
- Ecole Nationale Superieure de Statistique et Appliquee d’Abidjan (ENSEA), Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire
| | - Peter Gichangi
- Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | | | | | - Pierre Z. Akilimali
- Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | | | - Elizabeth Omoluabi
- Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Michele R. Decker
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
- Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ngole BE, Joho AA. Factors Influencing Modern Family Planning Utilization and Barriers in Women of Reproductive Age in the Iringa Region, Tanzania: A Mixed-Methods Study. SAGE Open Nurs 2025; 11:23779608251313897. [PMID: 39830805 PMCID: PMC11742162 DOI: 10.1177/23779608251313897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2024] [Accepted: 12/26/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Preventing unwanted pregnancies, achieving optimal child spacing, and improving quality of life are benefits of modern family planning (FP). This study aimed to assess modern FP use, identify the factors influencing its use and determine the barriers to FP use among women of reproductive age. Methods A mixed-methods approach was conducted in the Iringa Region between March and July 2022. Conveniently, 368 women of reproductive age were included in the quantitative study, and 48 were purposively selected for the qualitative study based on reported barriers to using modern FP. Interviewer-administered questionnaires and interview guides were used for data collection. The factors of modern FP use were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. For qualitative data, all interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed manually through thematic analysis. Results The prevalence of modern FP use was 181 (49%). Being married (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 5.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.77-16.73, p = .003), parity of 6 and more (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.99-5.95, p = .052), availability of modern FP methods (AOR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.03-2.85, p = .038), and women with primary education level (AOR = 2.99, 95% CI = 1.03-3.25, p = .001), women with secondary and higher education (AOR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.41-4.38, p = .001), were predictors for modern FP utilization. Four main themes merged (1) individual barriers, (2) hospital barriers, (3) cultural barriers, and (4) knowledge of modern FP methods. Conclusion The use of modern FP increases with women's education. There is a need for the government to invest in women's education and raise awareness and knowledge of the benefits of modern FP methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Besha E. Ngole
- Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing and Public Health, the University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Angelina A. Joho
- Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing and Public Health, the University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen W, Kirwan M, Hammett JF, Stewart R, Davis KC. Coerced Condomless Sex: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH 2024:1-16. [PMID: 38913125 PMCID: PMC11666806 DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2365936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Coerced condomless sex is a prevalent form of sexual coercion that is associated with severe negative health consequences. This scoping review addresses the current lack of synthesized qualitative evidence on coerced condomless sex. Our systematic literature search yielded 21 articles that met review eligibility criteria. Themes of coerced condomless sex were organized into three categories (tactics, motives, and sequelae) and presented separately for studies based on whether researchers stipulated pregnancy promotion intent as underlying the behavior. Coerced condomless sex perpetration tactics ranged from verbal pressure to physical assault. Besides pregnancy promotion, perpetration motives included control, dominance, entrapment, enhancing sexual experiences, and avoiding conflict. Following coerced condomless sex, victims reported developing protective strategies. They also reported experiencing various negative emotional, relational, and physical health effects. Interventions that specifically address coerced condomless sex perpetration and provide supportive programs for those who have experienced coercive condomless sex may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiqi Chen
- Arizona State University, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, 500 N. 3 St., Phoenix, AZ 85004
| | - Mitchell Kirwan
- University of Texas at El Paso, Department of Psychology, 500 W University Ave., El Paso, TX 79968
| | - Julia F. Hammett
- Arizona State University, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, 500 N. 3 St., Phoenix, AZ 85004
| | - Robin Stewart
- Arizona State University, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, 500 N. 3 St., Phoenix, AZ 85004
| | - Kelly Cue Davis
- Arizona State University, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, 500 N. 3 St., Phoenix, AZ 85004
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thomas HL, Bell SO, Karp C, Omoluabi E, Kibira SP, Makumbi F, Galadanci H, Shiferaw S, Seme A, Moreau C, Wood SN. A qualitative exploration of reproductive coercion experiences and perceptions in four geo-culturally diverse sub-Saharan African settings. SSM. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH 2024; 5:100383. [PMID: 38911288 PMCID: PMC11190838 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Reproductive coercion (RC) is any intentional behavior that interferes with another's reproductive decision-making or pregnancy outcome. This study aims to qualitatively examine RC experiences and perceptions among women and men in Ethiopia, Nigeria (Kano and Anambra States), and Uganda. This is a secondary analysis utilizing qualitative data from the Women's and Girls' Empowerment in Sexual and Reproductive Health study. Across sites, focus group discussions (38 groups; n=320 participants) and in-depth interviews (n=120) were conducted, recorded, and transcribed. Transcripts were loaded into Atlas.ti, and quotes describing experiences of reproductive control or abuse were coded as "reproductive coercion." RC quotes were input into a matrix for thematic analysis. Emergent RC themes included indirect reproductive pressures, direct family planning interference, concurrent experiences of violence, and responses to RC. Indirect reproductive pressures included tactics to both promote and prevent pregnancy, while direct interference centered on pregnancy promotion. Women who were not compliant with their partners' reproductive demands were often subjected to violence from multiple actors (i.e., parents, in-laws, community members) in addition to their partners. Despite concurrent forms of violence, women across sites resisted RC by using contraceptives covertly, choosing to abort, or leaving their abusive partnerships. Women and men across sites indicated that men were highly influential in fertility. RC behaviors were a mechanism of control over desired reproductive outcomes, which were often rooted in perceptions of childbearing as social status. Findings indicate a need for more nuanced community interventions targeting social norms, as well as improved RC screening and response within health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley L. Thomas
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Suzanne O. Bell
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Celia Karp
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | | | | | | | - Hadiza Galadanci
- Center for Advanced Medical Research and Training, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria
| | - Solomon Shiferaw
- Department of Reproductive Health and Health Service Management, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
| | - Assefa Seme
- Department of Reproductive Health and Health Service Management, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
| | - Caroline Moreau
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
- Soins Primaires et Prévention, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Inserm, F-94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Shannon N. Wood
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen W, Hammett JF, Stewart RJD, Kirwan M, Davis KC. Receipt of Coercive Condom Use Resistance: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH 2024; 61:399-413. [PMID: 37158996 PMCID: PMC10632542 DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2204297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Condom use resistance (CUR) refers to practices used to obtain unprotected sex with a partner who wishes to use a condom. Coercive CUR is a manipulative and aggressive form of CUR, which is associated with detrimental mental, physical, and sexual health consequences. This review synthesizes quantitative evidence on the prevalence and correlates of experiencing coercive CUR. A systematic approach, including title, abstract, and full-text review, was used to identify relevant empirical studies. Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Prevalence of experiencing coercive CUR ranged from 0.1% to 59.5%. Significant correlates of receiving coercive CUR included interpersonal violence, sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis, emotional stress, and drug use. Importantly, vulnerable populations (e.g., racial/ethnic minorities, men who have sex with men, sex workers) and people with low perceived control and resistive efficacy (i.e., the ability to say "no") had an increased likelihood of experiencing coercive CUR. Methodological weaknesses in the current literature include a lack of longitudinal studies and studies that examine the effectiveness of interventions, as well as failure to use consistent measures and include samples of men and sexual minorities. Future research should address these limitations. Intervention and prevention strategies should prioritize populations that are at greater risk for experiencing coercive CUR to achieve better health equity outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiqi Chen
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
| | - Julia F Hammett
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
| | - Robin J D Stewart
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
| | - Mitchell Kirwan
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
| | - Kelly Cue Davis
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baritwa MS, Joho AA. Intimate partner violence influences modern family planning use among married women in Tanzania: cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:421. [PMID: 38336740 PMCID: PMC10858459 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17666-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Married women who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) are less likely to negotiate with their partners on modern family planning (FP) use. This study aimed to determine the influence of intimate partner violence and sociodemographics on modern family planning use. METHODS A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Mara region, Tanzania from April to July 2020. A total of 366 married women were interviewed. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Analysis was done using SPSS version 25, and a binary logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors of modern FP use. The significance level was set at a p-value less than 0.05. RESULTS The overall prevalence of IPV was 73% with 54.1% physical, 36.3% psychological, and 25.4%, sexual violence. The prevalence of modern FP use was 62%, and the most (49.1%) common method practiced by married women was injection (Depo Provera). Physical violence (AOR = 0.32, p = 0.0056), and psychological violence (AOR = 0.22, p = 0.0022) had significantly reduced odds of modern FP use. Religion (AOR = 4.6, p = 0.0085), and availability of preferred modern FP methods (AOR = 9.27, p < 0.0001) had significantly increased odds of modern FP use. CONCLUSION In this study, there is a positive association between the use of modern FP methods and IPV. To prevent IPV and its negative health consequences, it is crucial to involve community leaders and primary healthcare workers. They can help in identifying the best strategies to prevent IPV and promote the use of modern FP methods. It is equally important to involve male partners in reproductive health decisions, including the use of modern FP methods. This approach will help reduce reproductive coercion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrimi S Baritwa
- Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Angelina A Joho
- Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Uysal J, Boyce SC, Undie CC, Liambila W, Wendoh S, Pearson E, Johns NE, Silverman JG. Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2023; 31:2227371. [PMID: 37594312 PMCID: PMC10443967 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2227371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of a reproductive empowerment contraceptive counselling intervention (ARCHES) adapted to private clinics in Nairobi, Kenya on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use and covert use, self-efficacy, awareness and use of intimate partner violence (IPV) survivor services, and attitudes justifying reproductive coercion (RC) and IPV. We conducted a cluster-controlled trial among female family planning patients (N = 659) in six private clinics non-randomly assigned to ARCHES or control in and around Nairobi, Kenya. Patients completed interviews immediately before (baseline) and after (exit) treatment and at three- and six-month follow-up. We use inverse probability by treatment weighting (IPTW) applied to difference-in-differences marginal structural models to estimate the treatment effect using a modified intent-to-treat approach. After IPTW, women receiving ARCHES contraceptive counselling, relative to controls, were more likely to receive a contraceptive method at exit (86% vs. 75%, p < 0.001) and had a significantly greater relative increase in awareness of IPV services at from baseline to three- (beta 0.84, 95% CI 0.13, 1.55) and six-month follow-up (beta 0.92, 95% CI 0, 1.84) and a relative decrease in attitudes justifying RC from baseline to six-month follow-up (beta -0.34, 95% CI -0.65, -0.04). In the first evaluation of a clinic-based approach to address both RC and IPV in a low- or middle-income country (LMIC) context, we found evidence that ARCHES contraceptive counselling improved proximal outcomes related to contraceptive use and coping with RC and IPV. We recommend further study and refinement of this approach in Kenya and other LMICs.Plain Language Summary Reproductive coercion (RC) and intimate partner violence (IPV) are two forms of gender-based violence that are known to harm women's reproductive health. While one intervention, ARCHES - Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings, has shown promise to improve contraceptive use and help women cope with RC and IPV in the United States, no approach has been proven effective in a low- or middle-income country (LMIC) context. In the first evaluation of a reproductive empowerment contraceptive counselling intervention in an LMIC setting, we found that ARCHES contraceptive counselling, relative to standard contraceptive counselling, improved proximal outcomes on contraceptive uptake, covert contraceptive use, awareness of local violence survives, and reduced attitudes justifying RC among women seeking contraceptive services in Nairobi, Kenya. Distal outcomes will be reported separately. Findings from this study support the promise of addressing RC and IPV within routine contraceptive counselling in Kenya on women's proximal outcomes related to contraceptive use and coping with violence and coercion and should be used to inform the further study of this approach in Kenya and other LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Uysal
- Predoctoral fellow, Center on Gender Equity and Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sabrina C. Boyce
- Postdoctoral fellow, Center on Gender Equity and Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Chi-Chi Undie
- Senior Associate, Population Council, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Seri Wendoh
- Global Lead for Gender & Inclusion, International Planned Parenthood Federation, London, UK
| | - Erin Pearson
- Research Scientist, Center on Gender Equity and Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Nicole E. Johns
- Data Analyst, Center on Gender Equity and Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jay G. Silverman
- Professor of Medicine and Global Public Health, Center on Gender Equity and Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lévesque S, Rousseau C, Jean-Thorn A, Lapierre S, Fernet M, Cousineau MM. Reproductive Coercion by Intimate Partners: Prevalence and Correlates in Canadian Individuals with the Capacity to be Pregnant. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283240. [PMID: 37535635 PMCID: PMC10399814 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the large body of research on violence against women, violence that specifically targets women's reproductive autonomy and control over their reproductive health, called reproductive coercion (RC), is poorly documented in Canada. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of RC behaviors in an adult Canadian community sample and to explore associated factors. STUDY DESIGN A self-report online questionnaire was administered from September 2020 to April 2021 in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Participants were recruited via social media, sexual and reproductive health clinics, community-based anti-violence organizations, and the project's partner organizations. The questionnaire contained validated RC questionnaire items and new items drawn from previous qualitative work. The sample comprised 427 participants, mostly self-identified as women (92%), aged 18 to 55 years (M = 29.01; SD = 6.64). Descriptive analyses and binary logistic regressions were conducted using SPSS 27. RESULTS The results of this study show that 63.9% of participants reported at least one lifetime experience of RC. According to our data, contraceptive sabotage was the most common form (62.8%). Of the participants who had been pregnant, 9.8% reported control of pregnancy outcomes. Each RC category shows a different pattern of correlates. The findings also reveal that intimate partner violence (IPV) increases the likelihood of contraceptive sabotage. Moreover, the study suggests that low education level and IPV increase the risk for control of pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION These findings underscore the importance of RC in the lives of many Canadian individuals with the capacity to be pregnant, and they highlight certain factors that place individuals at greater risk for RC. This knowledge can inform the development of prevention efforts and clinical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Lévesque
- Department of Sexology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Catherine Rousseau
- Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Ottawa University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arianne Jean-Thorn
- Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Simon Lapierre
- School of Social Work, Ottawa University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mylène Fernet
- Department of Sexology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lévesque S, Rousseau C, Raynault-Rioux L, Laforest J. Canadian service providers' perspectives on reproductive coercion and abuse: a participatory action research to address their needs and support their actions. Reprod Health 2023; 20:100. [PMID: 37391776 PMCID: PMC10311789 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01640-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a form of violence that affects sexual and reproductive health. Women and individuals who experienced RCA in an intimate relationship frequently consult service providers (SPs), such as health professionals or violence counselors. The objective of this article, which is the result of a participative action research project targeting RCA perpetrated by in an intimate partner, is twofold: (1) to better understand the practices as well as the barriers and facilitators encountered by SPs and (2) to develop information and awareness tools with them that meet their needs. To this end, we first held focus groups with 31 SPs. The use of thematic analysis revealed intervention strategies that focus on caring and listening, identifying signs of RCA, and creating a safe environment for disclosure. Their practices also focused on harm-reduction strategies and effective referrals. Despite the importance they gave to this issue, lack of time, inappropriate settings, and inadequate training hindered them from intervening effectively with individuals who were victims of RCA. They also indicated the need for easy-to-follow practice guidelines and patient education tools. Based on these findings and the best practices identified in the grey and scientific literature, we developed a practice guide for SPs and a booklet on RCA. The development of these guide and booklets involved a lot of back and forth to meet the needs expressed by the community and health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Lévesque
- Sexology Department, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.
| | - Catherine Rousseau
- Population Health, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Julie Laforest
- Population Health and Well-Being, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wood SN, Thomas HL, Thiongo M, Guiella G, Bazié F, Onadja Y, Mosso R, Fassassi R, Gichangi P, Decker MR. Intersection of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence: cross-sectional influences on women's contraceptive use in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065697. [PMID: 37164455 PMCID: PMC10173961 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Among nationally representative cross-sections of women in need of contraception from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya, we aimed to: (1) examine the intersection of past-year physical/sexual intimate partner violence (IPV), emotional IPV and reproductive coercion (RC) and (2) assess the impact of physical/sexual IPV, emotional IPV and RC on women's contraceptive use outcomes, including current contraceptive use, method type and covert use. DESIGN The present analysis uses cross-sectional female data collected in Burkina Faso (December 2020-March 2021), Côte d'Ivoire (October-November 2021) and Kenya (November-December 2020). SETTINGS Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya PARTICIPANTS: Analytical samples were restricted to partnered women with contraceptive need who completed a violence module (Burkina Faso n=1863; Côte d'Ivoire n=1105; Kenya n=3390). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The exposures of interest-past-year emotional IPV, physical/sexual IPV and RC-were assessed using abridged versions of the Revised Conflict and Tactics Scale-2 and Reproductive Coercion Scale, respectively. Outcomes of interest included current contraceptive use, contraceptive method type (female controlled vs male compliant), and covert contraceptive use, and used standard assessments. RESULTS Across sites, 6.4% (Côte d'Ivoire) to 7.8% (Kenya) of women in need of contraception experienced RC; approximately one-third to one-half of women experiencing RC reported no other violence forms (31.7% in Burkina Faso to 45.8% in Côte d'Ivoire), whereas physical/sexual IPV largely occurred with emotional IPV. In multivariable models, RC was consistently associated with covert use (Burkina Faso: aOR 2.84 (95% CI 1.21 to 6.64); Côte d'Ivoire: aOR 4.45 (95% CI 1.76 to 11.25); Kenya: aOR 5.77 (95% CI 3.51 to 9.46)). Some IPV in some settings was also associated with covert use (emotional IPV, Burkina Faso: aOR 2.99 (95% CI 1.56 to 5.74); physical/sexual, Kenya: aOR 2.35 (95% CI 1.33 to 4.17)). CONCLUSIONS Across settings, covert use is a critical strategy for women experiencing RC. Country policies must recognise RC as a unique form of violence with profound implications for women's reproductive health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon N Wood
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Haley L Thomas
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary Thiongo
- International Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya
| | - Georges Guiella
- Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso
| | - Fiacre Bazié
- Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso
| | - Yentéma Onadja
- Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso
| | - Rosine Mosso
- Ecole Nationale Superieure de Statistique et d'Economie Appliquee, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Raimi Fassassi
- Ecole Nationale Superieure de Statistique et d'Economie Appliquee, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Peter Gichangi
- International Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya
- Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michele R Decker
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wood SN, Thomas HL, Guiella G, Bazié F, Mosso R, Fassassi R, Akilimali PZ, Thiongo M, Gichangi P, Oumarou S, OlaOlorun FM, Omoluabi E, Khanna A, Kibira SPS, Makumbi F, Decker MR. Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion across ten sites: commonalities and divergence. Reprod Health 2023; 20:22. [PMID: 36707833 PMCID: PMC9881347 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01568-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reproductive coercion (RC) is a type of abuse where a partner asserts control over a woman's reproductive health trajectories. Recent research emphasizes that RC experiences may differ within and across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), as compared to higher income contexts, given social pressures surrounding childbearing. To date, nationally representative surveys have lacked comprehensive measures for RC, leading to gaps in understanding its prevalence and risk factors. Across eight LMICs (10 sites), we aimed to (1) validate the RC Scale; (2) calculate prevalence of RC and specific behaviors; and (3) assess correlates of RC. METHODS This analysis leverages cross-sectional Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) data collected from November 2020 to May 2022. Analyses were limited to women in need of contraception (Burkina Faso n = 2767; Côte d'Ivoire n = 1561; Kongo Central, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) n = 830; Kinshasa, DRC n = 846; Kenya n = 4588; Kano, Nigeria n = 535; Lagos, Nigeria n = 612; Niger n = 1525; Rajasthan, India n = 3017; Uganda n = 2020). Past-year RC was assessed via five items adapted from the original RC Scale and previously tested in LMICs. Confirmatory factor analysis examined fit statistics by site. Per-item and overall prevalence were calculated. Site-specific bivariate and multivariable logistic regression examined RC correlates across the socioecological framework. RESULTS Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed goodness of fit across all sites, with moderate internal consistency (alpha range: 0.66 Cote d'Ivoire-0.89 Kinshasa, DRC/Lagos, Nigeria). Past-year reported prevalence of RC was highest in Kongo Central, DRC (20.3%) and lowest in Niger (3.1%). Prevalence of individual items varied substantially by geography. Polygyny was the most common RC risk factor across six sites (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) range: 1.59-10.76). Increased partner education levels were protective in Kenya and Kano, Nigeria (aOR range: 0.23-0.67). Other assessed correlates differed by site. CONCLUSIONS Understanding RC prevalence and behaviors is central to providing woman-centered reproductive care. RC was most strongly correlated with factors at the partner dyad level; future research is needed to unpack the relative contributions of relationship power dynamics versus cultural norms surrounding childbearing. Family planning services must recognize and respond to women's immediate needs to ensure RC does not alter reproductive trajectories, including vulnerability to unintended pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon N. Wood
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, E4009, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA ,grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Haley L. Thomas
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, E4009, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
| | - Georges Guiella
- grid.463389.30000 0000 9980 0286Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP/University of Ouagadougou), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Fiacre Bazié
- grid.463389.30000 0000 9980 0286Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP/University of Ouagadougou), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Rosine Mosso
- grid.508476.80000 0001 2107 3477Ecole Nationale Superieure de Statistique et Appliquee d’Abidjan (ENSEA), Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
| | - Raimi Fassassi
- grid.508476.80000 0001 2107 3477Ecole Nationale Superieure de Statistique et Appliquee d’Abidjan (ENSEA), Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
| | - Pierre Z. Akilimali
- grid.9783.50000 0000 9927 0991Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Mary Thiongo
- International Centre for Reproductive Health-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Peter Gichangi
- International Centre for Reproductive Health-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya ,grid.449703.d0000 0004 1762 6835Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya ,grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sani Oumarou
- Institut National de la Statistique du Niger, Niamey, Niger
| | - Funmilola M. OlaOlorun
- grid.9582.60000 0004 1794 5983College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Elizabeth Omoluabi
- grid.8974.20000 0001 2156 8226University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Anoop Khanna
- grid.464858.30000 0001 0495 1821Indian Institute of Health Management Research, Sanganer, Jaipur, India
| | - Simon Peter Sebina Kibira
- grid.464858.30000 0001 0495 1821Indian Institute of Health Management Research, Sanganer, Jaipur, India
| | - Fredrick Makumbi
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Michele R. Decker
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, E4009, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA ,grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA ,grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grace KT, Miller E. Future directions for reproductive coercion and abuse research. Reprod Health 2023; 20:5. [PMID: 36593505 PMCID: PMC9809032 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01550-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a form of intimate partner violence (IPV) in which people with the capacity for pregnancy experience coercive behaviors that threaten their reproductive autonomy. Behaviors that constitute RCA include contraceptive control/sabotage, pregnancy pressure, and controlling the outcome of a pregnancy. Several areas of RCA study have emerged: associations with IPV, health outcomes resulting from RCA, and demographic and contextual factors associated with experiencing RCA. Current research in these areas is summarized and placed in a global context, including sexual and gender minority groups, use of RCA (exploring perpetration), RCA interventions, RCA in women with disabilities, and the question of whether people assigned male at birth can be RCA victims. CONCLUSION Areas for future exploration include evolving interpretations of pregnancy intention in the setting of fewer options for abortion, RCA in people with disabilities and multiple levels of marginalization, including sexual and gender minorities; intersections between RCA and economic abuse in the context of efforts at economic justice; and community-centered approaches to intervention and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Trister Grace
- grid.22448.380000 0004 1936 8032School of Nursing, College of Public Health, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Mailstop 3C4, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
| | - Elizabeth Miller
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 120 Lytton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1481 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wood SN, Dozier JL, Karp C, Desta S, Decker MR, Shiferaw S, Seme A, Yirgu R, Zimmerman LA. Pregnancy coercion, correlates, and associated modern contraceptive use within a nationally representative sample of Ethiopian women. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2022; 30:2139891. [PMID: 36469634 PMCID: PMC9728127 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2139891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Partner-perpetrated pregnancy coercion inhibits women's reproductive autonomy. However, few studies have quantified pregnancy coercion and its effects on women's health within low- and middle-income countries. Among a national sample of Ethiopian women, this study aimed to: (1) assess the prevalence of past-year pregnancy coercion and explore regional differences; (2) identify correlates; (3) examine the relationship between pregnancy coercion and modern contraceptive use. Analyses utilise cross-sectional data from Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA)-Ethiopia, a nationally representative sample of females aged 15-49 conducted from October to November 2019. Past-year pregnancy coercion was assessed via five items and analysed dichotomously and categorically for severity. Among women in need of contraception, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression examined associations between variables of interest, per aim, accounting for sampling weights and clustering by enumeration area. Approximately 20% of Ethiopian women reported past-year pregnancy coercion (11.4% less severe; 8.6% more severe), ranging from 16% in Benishangul-Gumuz to 35% in Dire Dawa. Increasing parity was associated with decreased odds of pregnancy coercion. Among women in need of contraception, experience of pregnancy coercion was associated with a 32% decrease in odds of modern contraceptive use (aOR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53-0.89); when disaggregated by severity, odds decreased for most severe pregnancy coercion (aOR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.41-0.83). Results indicate that partner-perpetrated pregnancy coercion is prevalent across diverse regions of Ethiopia, and most severe forms could interrupt recent gains in contraceptive coverage and progress to sexual and reproductive health and rights. Providers must be aware of potential contraceptive interference and address coercive influences during contraceptive counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon N Wood
- Assistant Scientist, Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jessica L Dozier
- PhD Student, Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Celia Karp
- Assistant Scientist, Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Selamawit Desta
- Director of Survey Operations, Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michele R Decker
- Bloomberg Professor of American Health, Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Women’s Health and Rights Program Director, Center for Public Health & Human Rights, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Joint Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Solomon Shiferaw
- Associate Professor, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Assefa Seme
- Associate Professor, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Robel Yirgu
- Associate Professor, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Linnea A Zimmerman
- Assistant Professor, Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wood SN, Kennedy SR, Akumu I, Tallam C, Asira B, Zimmerman LA, Glass N, Decker MR. Understanding the Link Between Reproductive Coercion and Covert Use of Contraception as a Safety Strategy for Women Experiencing Violence in Nairobi's Urban Informal Settlements. Violence Against Women 2022; 29:1343-1367. [PMID: 36000323 DOI: 10.1177/10778012221108422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This mixed-methods study examined the relationship between reproductive coercion (RC) and covert contraceptive use among intimate partner violence survivors in Nairobi, Kenya. Quantitative analyses utilize baseline data from the myPlan Kenya trial (n = 321). Purposive in-depth interviews (IDIs) (n = 30) explored women's reproductive safety strategies. Multinomial analyses indicated increased covert use and decreased overt use compared to nonuse, for women experiencing RC; logistic models similarly report increased odds of covert use with RC experience. Qualitative data contextualize women's reasons for use and challenges faced. Integration of reproductive safety strategies into family planning and violence services can improve the safe use of contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon N Wood
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Irene Akumu
- Mashinani Department, Ujamaa-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Ben Asira
- Mashinani Department, Ujamaa-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Linnea A Zimmerman
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nancy Glass
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of International Health, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Center for Global Health, 15851Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michele R Decker
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sheeran N, Vallury K, Sharman LS, Corbin B, Douglas H, Bernardino B, Hach M, Coombe L, Keramidopoulos S, Torres-Quiazon R, Tarzia L. Reproductive coercion and abuse among pregnancy counselling clients in Australia: trends and directions. Reprod Health 2022; 19:170. [PMID: 35907880 PMCID: PMC9338495 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01479-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) interferes with a person's reproductive autonomy and can be classified into behaviours that are pregnancy promoting or pregnancy preventing (including coerced abortion). However, prevalence data are lacking, and little is known about whether particular forms of RCA are more or less common. The aims of our study were to explore how frequently people seeking pregnancy counselling reported RCA, the proportions reporting the different forms of RCA, and whether there were different trends based on a range of demographic factors. METHODS Data were collected from 5107 clients seeking counselling support for their pregnancy between January 2018 and December 2020 from two leading providers of pregnancy counselling and sexual and reproductive health services in Australia, Marie Stopes Australia and Children by Choice. Counsellors identified and recorded the presence of RCA and whether the behaviour was pregnancy promoting and/or pregnancy preventing. Demographic factors included age, and whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee community or as an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person. RESULTS RCA was identified in 15.4% of clients, with similar proportions disclosing RCA towards pregnancy (6%) and towards pregnancy prevention or abortion (7.5%), and 1.9% experiencing RCA towards pregnancy and abortion concurrently. There were no differences based on age or whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee background, though people who identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander experienced RCA that was significantly more likely to be pregnancy promoting. CONCLUSIONS RCA is commonly disclosed by people seeking support in a pregnancy counselling context, and coercion and abuse is equally likely to be towards pregnancy promotion or pregnancy prevention/abortion. Given the prevalence and negative impacts of RCA, regardless of age and background, we recommend sensitive and culturally respectful enquiry around experiences of RCA be embedded in healthcare, health education, and health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Sheeran
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt Campus, 176 Messines ridge road, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane, Australia.
| | | | - Leah S Sharman
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Heather Douglas
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Maria Hach
- Multicultural Centre for Women's Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leanne Coombe
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - Laura Tarzia
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Family Violence Prevention, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moulton JE, Corona MIV, Vaughan C, Bohren MA. Women's perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0261551. [PMID: 34932570 PMCID: PMC8691598 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person's reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to explore women's experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse globally, to broaden understanding of the different ways reproductive coercion and abuse is perpetrated, perceived and experienced across settings and socio-cultural contexts. METHOD We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase for eligible studies from inception to 25th February 2021. Primary studies with a qualitative study design that focused on the experiences and perceptions of women who have encountered reproductive coercion and abuse were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts, and full texts were screened by independent reviewers. We extracted data from included studies using a form designed for this synthesis and assessed methodological limitations using CASP. We used Thomas and Harden's thematic analysis approach to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in review findings. RESULTS We included 33 studies from twelve countries in South Asia, the Asia Pacific, North America, South America, Africa and Europe. Most studies used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to discuss women's experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse. Reproductive coercion and abuse manifested in a range of behaviours including control of pregnancy outcome, pregnancy pressure or contraceptive sabotage. There were a range of reasons cited for reproductive coercion and abuse, including control of women, rigid gender roles, social inequalities and family pressure. Women's different responses to reproductive coercion and abuse included using covert contraception and feelings of distress, anger and trauma. Across contexts, perpetration and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse were influenced by different factors including son preferences and social exclusion. CONCLUSIONS We reflect on the importance of socio-cultural factors in understanding the phenomenon of reproductive coercion and abuse and how it affects women, as well as how the mechanisms of power and control at both individual and societal levels work to perpetuate the incidence of reproductive coercion and abuse against women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E. Moulton
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Martha Isela Vazquez Corona
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Cathy Vaughan
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Meghan A. Bohren
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|