Comparison of patient-reported outcomes among those who chose ACL reconstruction or non-surgical treatment

Not all patient-reported outcome measures are equivalent at two years compared to one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to assess for clinically important differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at one and two years post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A retrospective comparison of prospectively collected PROMs for a single cohort who underwent a primary ACLR with or without associated meniscal surgery from 2016 to 2020 was assessed. Six externally validated PROMs were collected preoperatively and at standardized times postoperatively. Descriptive statistics and paired equivalence testing of PROMs at one and two years after surgery was completed using previously published or calculated minimal clinically important differences as upper and lower equivalence limits. A repeated measures analysis of PROMs that were not clinically equivalent at one and two years after surgery was completed to assess for a clinically significant difference. Subgroup analyses based on sex, age and associated meniscal injury were completed.

RESULTS

One-hundred and forty-five participants with a mean age of 28.7 years (standard deviation: 9.9 years) were included in the final analysis. All PROMs were clinically equivalent at two years compared to one year after ACLR except the quality of life and sport and recreation domains of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The quality of life (mean difference (MD):12.3, P ​< ​0.01, effect size (η2): 0.65) and sport and recreation (MD: 8.78, P ​< ​0.01, η2: 0.50) domains of the KOOS were clinically different at two years compared to one year postoperatively. No major differences were found in the subgroup analyses compared to the entire included sample.

CONCLUSION

While most PROMs were equivalent at two years compared to one year after ACLR, the quality of life and sport and recreation domains of the KOOS, which reflect knee performance during higher demand activities, exhibited a clinically significant difference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Assessment of Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential role of Artificial Intelligence tools like ChatGPT in patient education. To do this, we assessed both the quality and readability of information provided by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 in relation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury and treatment. ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 were used to answer common patient queries relating to ACL injuries and treatment. The quality of the information was assessed using the DISCERN criteria. Readability was assessed with the use of seven readability formulae: the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Raygor Estimate, the SMOG, the Fry, the FORCAST, and the Gunning Fog. The mean reading grade level (RGL) was compared with the recommended 8th-grade reading level, the mean RGL among adults in America. The perceived quality and mean RGL of answers given by both ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 was also compared. Both ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 yielded DISCERN scores suggesting "good" quality of information, with ChatGPT 4 slightly outperforming 3.5. However, readability levels for both versions significantly exceeded the average 8th-grade reading level for American patients. ChatGPT 3.5 had a mean RGL of 18.08, while the mean RGL of ChatGPT 4 was 17.9, exceeding the average American reading grade level by 10.08 grade levels and 9.09 grade levels, respectively. While ChatGPT can provide both reliable and good quality information on ACL injuries and treatment options, the readability of the content may limit its utility. Additionally, the consistent lack of source citation represents a significant area of concern for patients and clinicians alike. If AI is to play a role in patient education, it must reliably produce information which is accurate, easily comprehensible, and clearly sourced.

Patients With Low Resilience Scores Have Significantly Worse Postoperative Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Than Patients With Normal or High Resilience Scores

Purpose

To evaluate the relationship between patient resilience and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

Patients who underwent an ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon between January 2012 and June 2020 were identified by an institutional query using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were included if they (1) underwent a primary ACL reconstruction and (2) had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Data were retrospectively collected regarding demographics, surgical details, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and 12-item short form survey (SF-12) scores. Resilience scores were obtained via the Brief Resilience Scale questionnaire. Stratification into low (LR), normal (NR), and high resilience (HR) was based on standard deviation from mean Brief Resilience Scale score to determine differences in PROMS between groups.

Results

One-hundred eighty-seven patients were identified by the institutional query. Of the 187 patients, 180 met inclusion criteria. Seven patients underwent revision ACL reconstruction and were excluded from the study. One-hundred three patients (57.2%) completed the postoperative questionnaire and were included. Patients in the NR group and HR group had significantly greater postoperative SF-12 scores (P < .001) and lower postoperative VAS pain scores (P < .001) when compared with those of the LR group. This trend was again shown with breakdown of the SF-12 into physical and mental aspects, each of which were significantly greater in either the NR group or HR group when compared with the LR group (P < .001). Overall, 97.9% and 99.0% of patients had changes in their SF-12 total and VAS pain scores respectively that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference for the cohort.

Conclusions

Patients with lower resilience scores have worse PROMs and increased pain than patients with greater resilience at a minimum of 2-year follow-up after ACL reconstruction.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Can patients and clinicians find conservative management protocols of anterior cruciate ligament injuries online? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically search the internet for conservative rehabilitation protocols for people with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and critically appraise the websites and exercise protocols.

DESIGN

Systematic review of online rehabilitation protocols.

SEARCH

We searched four online search-engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing, DuckDuckGo).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Rehabilitation protocols on active, English language websites aimed at conservative (non-surgical) management of an ACL injury.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We extracted descriptive information and assessed quality of the websites using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the Health on the Net Code (HONcode) certificate, and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease (FKRE). We assessed completeness of exercise protocol reporting using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). We performed a descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

We found 14 websites that met our selection criteria. The protocols varied between 10 and 26 weeks duration, nine were from the United States, five targeted patients, and 13 used multiple phases with a variety of different criteria for progression. Three protocols scored good quality with the JAMA, two were HonCode certified, and ten had good readability according to the FKRE. Completeness of exercise protocol reporting in all but one protocol was poor according to the CERT.

CONCLUSION

Few rehabilitation protocols for conservative management of ACL injuries were available online. Most of the websites showed good readability, but poor quality and credibility with inadequate description of exercise protocols.

Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Single-Bundle Round or Ribbon-like Hamstring Tendon Graft

BACKGROUND

Persistent instability of the knee is reported in up to 30% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Based on anatomic findings showing that ACL is a flat ribbon-like structure that twists during knee flexion, a new surgical ACL reconstruction technique using a ribbon-like graft has been developed. However the effect of this surgical technique on knee kinematics has not yet been evaluated.

PURPOSE

To compare the anteroposterior and rotational stability of the knee after ACL reconstruction using single-bundle (SB) round and ribbon-like grafts in anterolateral-intact/deficient knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve human fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system. Internal rotation and anterior translation of the knee were recorded from 0° to 90° of flexion. A full kinematic assessment was performed in each of the following conditions: (1) intact knee, (2) after sectioning of the ACL, (3) after ACL reconstruction using a SB hamstring tendon graft in a round configuration and a ribbon-like configuration, and (4) after sectioning of the anterolateral structures. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

When compared with the intact knee, the ACL-deficient knee demonstrated a mean ± SD increase in anterior translation and internal rotation of 6.3 ± 2.5 mm (P < .01) and 5.8°± 2.3° (P < .01), respectively. After ACL reconstruction using a SB ribbon-like graft, the mean difference in anterior translation and internal rotation as compared with the intact knee was -0.1 ± 1.5 mm (P = .842) and 0.0°± 1.1° (P = .999). These differences from the intact knee were also not significant after ACL reconstruction using a round graft (-0.1 ± 1.3 mm, P = .999; -0.5°± 1.5°, P = .401). In the ACL-reconstructed knee using either a ribbon-like or round graft, sectioning of the anterolateral structures did not induce a significant increase of anterior translation and internal rotation of the knee.

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction using a SB ribbon-like or round graft restored the kinematics of the intact knee at time zero. Secondary sectioning of the anterolateral structures in the ACL-reconstructed knee using both types of graft did not significantly affect the anterior translation and internal rotation of the knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first biomechanical study on the new ACL reconstruction technique using a ribbon-like graft.

When context creates uncertainty: experiences of patients who choose rehabilitation as a treatment after an ACL injury

Up to 50% of patients who suffer an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury receive or opt for rehabilitation alone as initial treatment in Scandinavia. Knowledge of whether patients treated with rehabilitation alone after ACL injury are satisfied is lacking. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients treated with rehabilitation alone after an ACL injury. Fourteen patients (35.9 (19-56) years old) who suffered an ACL injury treated with rehabilitation alone, a mean of 32 months before inclusion, were interviewed. The interview transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach. The experiences of patients treated with rehabilitation after an ACL injury were summarised in one theme: 'Is the grass greener on the other side? Context characterised by uncertainty', supported by three main categories and nine subcategories. Uncertainty permeated the context of all levels of knee-related life following ACL injury: (1) in the past, patients felt uncertainty regarding treatment choices, (2) in the present, patients felt uncertainty regarding their physical capacity and knee self-efficacy, and (3) for the future, patients felt uncertainty regarding what might happen. With few exceptions, patients' experiences after an ACL injury treated with rehabilitation alone are characterised by uncertainty regarding their physical function, psychological impairments and possible future limitation of knee function. Uncertainty is experienced by patients in the past, the present and the future. Patients experience the knee as a symptomatic obstacle and need to adapt the physical activity to the presence of symptoms.

Knee osteoarthritis, joint laxity and PROMs following conservative management versus surgical reconstruction for ACL rupture: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients whose rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be managed conservatively or undergo reconstruction surgery.

SOURCE OF DATA

Current scientific literature published in Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Several studies published by July 2022 compare surgical and conservative management following ACL rupture. The latest evidence suggests that surgical management may expose patients to an increased risk of early-onset knee osteoarthritis (OA).

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The state of art does not recommend a systematic ACL reconstruction to all patients who tore their ACL. After the initial trauma, surgical reconstruction may produce even greater damage to the intra-articular structures compared to conservative management.

GROWING POINTS

The state of art does not recommend systematic surgical reconstruction to all patients who tore their ACL. The present study compared surgical reconstruction versus conservative management for primary ACL ruptures in terms of joint laxity, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and rate of osteoarthritis.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

ACL reconstruction provides significant improvement in joint laxity compared to conservative management, but is associated with a significantly greater rate of knee osteoarthritis, despite similar results at PROM assessment.

The Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients Waiting for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Worse Than an Age- and Sex-Matched Population: Increasing Time on Waiting List for Surgery Was Independently Associated with a Worse Quality of Life

Background

The aims of this study were to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients awaiting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared to the population at risk: whether knee-specific function was predictive of HRQoL and to identify factors associated with a worse HRQoL.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients (male, n = 50; female, n = 17; mean age, 29) identified from the surgical waiting list completed a questionnaire that included demographics, BMI, time of injury, EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D), Short-Form (SF-36), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. Age- and sex-matched HRQoL data were obtained from population level data.

Results

The mean EQ-5D score for the study cohort was significantly worse than the matched score (difference, 0.367; p < 0.001), and the same trend was observed for all eight dimensions of the SF-36 score. Thirty-three (49%) patients felt their health, in general, was somewhat or much worse compared to one year ago. There was a correlation between IKDC and EQ-5D scores (r = 0.540, p < 0.001). Linear regression was used to formulate the EQ-5D score: EQ-5D = (IKDCx0.013)–0.015 (constant). The SF-36 physical component and length of time on the waiting list were independently associated with the HRQoL, with each 14-point drop or for every 200 days, a clinically significant deterioration in patients' HRQoL occurred, respectively.

Conclusions

Patients had a significantly worse HRQoL when compared to the age- and sex-matched population, which deteriorates with worsening physical function and increasing length of time on the waiting list. The knee-specific IKDC correlated with HRQoL and could be used to estimate the EQ-5D score.

Greater proportion of patients report an acceptable symptom state after ACL reconstruction compared with non-surgical treatment: a 10-year follow-up from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry

Objectives

To compare the proportion of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury reporting an acceptable symptom state, between non-surgical and surgical treatment during a 10-year follow-up.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Exceeding the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was the primary outcome. The PASS and KOOS₄ (aggregated KOOS without the activities of daily living (ADL) subscale) were compared cross-sectionally at baseline and 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after ACL injury, where patients treated non-surgically were matched with the maximum number of patients with ACL reconstruction for age, sex and activity at injury.

Results

The non-surgical group consisted of 982 patients, who were each matched against 9 patients treated with ACL reconstruction (n=8,838). A greater proportion of patients treated with ACL reconstruction exceeded the PASS in KOOS pain, ADL, sports and recreation, and quality of life compared with patients treated non-surgically at all follow-ups. With respect to quality of life, significantly more patients undergoing ACL reconstruction achieved a PASS compared with patients receiving non-surgical treatment at all follow-ups except at baseline, with differences ranging between 11% and 25%; 1 year −25.4 (−29.1; −21.7), 2 years −16.9 (−21.2; −12.5), 5 years −11.0 (−16.9; −5.1) and 10 years −24.8 (−36.0; −13.6). The ACL-reconstructed group also reported statistically greater KOOS₄ at all follow-ups.

Conclusion

A greater proportion of patients treated with ACL reconstruction report acceptable knee function, including higher quality of life than patients treated non-surgically at cross-sectional follow-ups up to 10 years after the treatment of an ACL injury.

Long-term Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Reconstruction vs No Reconstruction-A Comparison of 2 Case Series

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction is considered to provide the best opportunity for return to sports (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. However, recent studies report that <50% of athletes return to preinjury sporting levels and that RTS rates at 1 year after injury are the same for athletes undergoing reconstruction and nonoperative management. Long-term studies are essential to confirm these findings and guide decisions regarding surgery.

PURPOSE

First, to compare long-term sports participation after ACL reconstruction and nonreconstruction and, second, to relate RTS level to strength and stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHOD

Patients with ACL deficiency (n = 101) who were referred for physical therapy at the time of diagnosis were followed long term: 56 were treated surgically 2.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1-4) after injury and 45 were treated nonoperatively. At long-term follow-up, the reconstructed group was at 9 years (IQR, 7-11) after injury and aged 33.3 ± 6.2 years (mean ± SD, 70% male; 61% meniscal injury), and the nonreconstructed group was at 11 years (IQR, 7-14) after injury and aged 38.7 ± 8.3 years (67% male; 58% meniscal injury). Measures of objective stability, subjective stability, and quadriceps/hamstring strength were compared between groups using independent-samples t tests. Current RTS level, scored on a 6-point scale, was compared between groups using chi-square tests. Spearman rho correlated RTS with outcome measures.

RESULTS

Of the total group of patients, 96% with reconstruction and 93% without continued to play sports. In the reconstructed and nonreconstructed groups, 4% and 7% did not RTS, and 8% and 17% returned to safe sports, respectively: 13% and 12% to running, 20% and 26% to sports involving limited twisting, 12% and 24% to recreational pivoting sports, and 43% and 14% to competitive pivoting sports. The only significant difference was in return to competitive pivoting sports (P = .003). Five patients with reconstruction ruptured the contralateral ACL, and 1 ruptured his graft. Most patients treated nonoperatively modified their sports participation. Their RTS levels correlated significantly with quadriceps strength (r = 0.65; P < .001), hamstring strength (r = 0.721; P < .001), and subjective stability (r = 0.405; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Surgically treated patients returned to competitive pivoting sports at 3 times the rate of those managed nonoperatively, confirming that reconstruction provides the best opportunity for continued participation in competitive pivoting sports. Regardless of grouping, RTS correlated with modifiable factors, including strength and stability. Higher rates of subsequent injuries observed after reconstruction may result from increased participation in competitive pivoting sports.

Is Insurance Status Associated With Likelihood of Operative ACL Injury Treatment Compared With Nonoperative Treatment?

Background:

While many factors inform the choice of operative versus nonoperative treatment of injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee, socioeconomic status influences this decision, as has been reported with other procedures.

Purpose:

To identify any associations between insurance status and likelihood of operative treatment of ACL injuries.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for ACL injuries and reconstruction from 2001 to 2013. Chi-square analysis was performed to determine significant predictors of operative intervention. Binary logistic regression was used to account for demographic and significant predictor variables. Results were recorded as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Significance was defined as P < .05.

Results:

A total of 32,541 patients with ACL injuries were included in the final analysis. Overall incidence of surgical reconstruction was 85.4% (n = 27,805). Multivariable regression revealed that nonprivate insurance types were associated with lower likelihoods of operative reconstruction compared with private insurance: the lowest likelihood of operation was seen in uninsured patients (OR, 0.31; P < .01), followed by Medicare (OR, 0.33; P < .01) and Medicaid (OR, 0.51; P < .01) patients. There was also a decreased likelihood of surgery for elderly (OR, 0.0 [for age ≥75 years]; P < .01) and Black patients (OR, 0.65; P < .01). An increased likelihood of surgery was seen with female patients (OR, 1.14; P < .01). Patients in the highest median household income quartile were more likely to undergo surgery than those in the lowest (OR, 1.36; P < .01).

Conclusion:

Compared with privately insured patients, patients with nonprivate insurance had lower likelihood of surgery. Furthermore, patients in higher income quartiles were more likely to undergo operative fixation. These findings may suggest a need for more precise treatment guidelines and studies that investigate causes of such differences.

Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

Despite the significant difference between men and women in incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, there is a paucity of consistent information on the influence of patient sex on outcomes after ACL reconstruction. A previous meta-analysis has demonstrated that female patients have worse outcomes with regard to laxity, revision rate, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score and are less likely to return to sports (RTS).

Purpose:

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate and compare sex-specific outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed using PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, OVID, and Cochrane databases per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The following search terms were used: “anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction” OR “ACL reconstruction” OR “anterior cruciate ligament” OR “ACL” AND “gender” OR “sex” OR “male” OR “female” AND “outcome” AND “2015-Present” to gather all relevant articles between 2015 and 2020. A risk-of-bias assessment and quality assessment was conducted on included studies.

Results:

Of 9594 studies initially identified, 20 studies with 35,935 male and 21,455 female patients were included for analysis. The 7 studies reporting International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores showed that male patients had statistically significantly higher postoperative scores (mean difference, 3.02 [95% CI, 1.19-4.84]; P< .01; I² = 66%), and 7 studies that reported the rate of ACL revision showed there was no significant difference between male and female patients (odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.45-1.60]; P = .61; I² = 94%). The 7 studies that reported rates of rerupture showed that males were significantly more likely than females to have a graft rerupture (odds ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.22-1.50]; P < .01; I² = 0%). Male patients reported a higher RTS rate than did their female counterparts (59.82% compared with 42.89%); however, no formal statistical analysis could be done because of the variability in reporting techniques.

Conclusion:

Male and female patients with ACL injuries demonstrated similar outcomes regarding their rates of revision; however, male patients were found to have statistically significantly higher postoperative IKDC scores but at the same time higher rerupture rates. Our findings suggest that sex-based differences in outcomes after ACL reconstruction vary based on which metric is used. These results must be considered when counseling patients with ACL injuries.

Failure rates of common grafts used in ACL reconstructions: a systematic review of studies published in the last decade

INTRODUCTION

In this review paper, graft failure rates of different graft types (hamstring tendon autografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts, quadriceps tendon autografts and diverse allografts) that are used for surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament are compared and statistically analysed.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted in PubMed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria. A total of 194 studies, which reported graft failure rates of at least one of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction methods mentioned above, were included in this systematic review. To be able to compare studies with different follow-up periods, a yearly graft failure rate for each reconstruction group was calculated and then investigated for significant differences by using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 152,548 patients treated with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included in the calculations. Comparison of graft types showed that hamstring tendon autografts had a yearly graft failure rate of 1.70%, whereas the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft group had 1.16%, the quadriceps tendon autograft group 0.72%, and the allografts 1.76%.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this meta-data study indicate that reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament using quadriceps tendon autografts, hamstring tendon autografts, patellar tendon autografts or allografts does not show significant differences in terms of graft failure rates.

Do Narcotic Use, Physical Therapy Location, or Payer Type Predict Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND

Opioid use and public insurance have been correlated with worse outcomes in a number of orthopaedic surgeries. These factors have not been investigated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate if narcotic use, physical therapy location, and insurance type are predictors of patient-reported outcomes after ACLR. It was hypothesized that at 1 year postsurgically, increased postoperative narcotic use would be associated with worse outcomes, physical therapy obtained within the authors' integrated health care system would lead to better outcomes, and public insurance would lead to worse outcomes and athletic activity.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

All patients undergoing unilateral, primary ACLR between January 2015 and February 2016 at a large health system were enrolled in a standard-of-care prospective cohort. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) and the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric-Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) were collected before surgery and at 1 year postoperatively. Concomitant knee pathology was assessed arthroscopically and electronically captured. Patient records were analyzed to determine physical therapy location, insurance status, and narcotic use. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors of the KOOS and HSS Pedi-FABS score.

RESULTS

A total of 258 patients were included in the analysis (mean age, 25.8; 51.2% women). In multivariable regression analysis, narcotic use, physical therapy location, and insurance type were not independent predictors of any KOOS subscales. Public insurance was associated with a lower HSS Pedi-FABS score (-4.551, P = .047) in multivariable analysis. Narcotic use or physical therapy location was not associated with the HSS Pedi-FABS score.

CONCLUSION

Increased narcotic use surrounding surgery, physical therapy location within the authors' health care system, and public versus private insurance were not associated with disease-specific KOOS subscale scores. Patients with public insurance had worse HSS Pedi-FABS activity scores compared with patients with private insurance, but neither narcotic use nor physical therapy location was associated with activity scores. Physical therapy location did not influence outcomes, suggesting that patients be given a choice in the location they received physical therapy (as long as a standardized protocol is followed) to maximize compliance.

Tibiofemoral helical axis of motion during the full gait cycle measured using biplane radiography

The helical axis of motion (HAM), which describes the simultaneous multiplanar translations and rotations that occur within a joint, has been proposed as a single measure to characterize dynamic joint function. The objective of this study was to determine the tibiofemoral HAM during 5 discrete phases of gait. Thirty-nine knees from 20 healthy adults were imaged using high-speed biplane radiography during treadmill walking. The primary outcome measures were the intersection of the HAM with the sagittal plane of the femur, and the direction of the HAM. The intersection point translated an average of 12.7 ± 5.5% of femur condyle depth in the anterior-posterior direction and 28.6 ± 13.3% of femur condyle height in the proximal-distal direction during gait. The anterior/posterior and proximal/distal components of the HAM vector were greater during stance (5.6°±3.8° and 11.1°±5.0°, respectively) than during swing (2.0°±1.1° and 6.4°±3.8°, respectively) (p<0.001) reflecting greater coupled rotations during stance. No significant side-to-side differences in intersection point location or HAM orientation were found during any of the 5 phases of gait (max difference 4.1 ± 3.4% of femur condyle depth and 13.1 ± 16.7% of femur condyle height; 12.7°±12.3° proximal/distal and 4.2°±4.5° anterior/posterior direction). Loading significantly affected HAM location and orientation (p<0.001). Knowledge of healthy knee HAM and typical side-to-side differences during gait can serve as a baseline for evaluating knee motion after clinical interventions.

Anterior Knee Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Anterior knee pain is a frequent condition after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but its origin remains uncertain. Studies have suggested that donor site morbidity in autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstructions may contribute to patellofemoral pain, but this does not explain why hamstring tendon reconstructions may also present with anterior pain.

Purpose

To evaluate the prevalence of anterior knee pain after ACLR and its predisposing factors.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We evaluated the records of all patients who underwent ACLR between 2000 and 2016 at a private facility. The prevalence of anterior knee pain after surgery was assessed, and possible risk factors (graft type, patient sex, surgical technique, range of motion) were evaluated.

Results

The records of 438 patients (mean age, 30 years) who underwent ACLR were analyzed. Anterior knee pain was found in 6.2% of the patients. We found an increased prevalence of anterior knee pain with patellar tendon graft, with an odds ratio of 3.4 (P = .011). Patients who experienced extension deficit in the postoperative period had an odds ratio of 5.3 of having anterior pain (P < .001). Anterior knee pain was not correlated with patient sex or surgical technique.

Conclusion

The chance of having anterior knee pain after ACLR was higher when patellar tendon autograft was used compared with hamstring tendon graft, as well as in patients who experienced extension deficit in the postoperative period.

A Secondary Injury Prevention Program May Decrease Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Athletes: 2-Year Injury Rates in the ACL-SPORTS Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the addition of perturbation training to a secondary injury prevention program reduces the rate of second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury compared to the prevention program alone.

DESIGN

Single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Thirty-nine female athletes who intended to return to cutting/pivoting sports were enrolled 3 to 9 months after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Athletes were randomized to receive a training program of either progressive strengthening, agility, plyometrics, and prevention (SAPP) (n = 20) or SAPP plus perturbation training (n = 19); each had 10 sessions over 5 weeks. Occurrence and side of second ACL injury were recorded for 2 years after primary ACLR.

RESULTS

There were 9 second ACL injuries in the 2 years after ACLR. There was no statistically significant difference in rate or side of second ACL injury between the SAPP-plus-perturbation training and SAPP groups.

CONCLUSION

Adding perturbation training to a secondary ACL injury prevention program did not affect the rate of second ACL injury in female athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(9):523-530. Epub 1 Aug 2020. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9407.

Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Similarly Improve Knee Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To determine the stabilizing role of anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine whether either procedure was superior to the other.

METHODS

Six nonpaired, human, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with a 6-df robotic system. Internal rotation and anterior translation of the knee were recorded from 0° to 90° of flexion after application of a 5-Nm internal rotation torque and a 134-N anterior load, respectively. A full kinematic assessment was performed in each of the following conditions: (1) intact knee, (2) after sectioning of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), (3) after sectioning of the ACL and anterolateral ligament, (4) after isolated ACLR, and (5) after combined ACLR and Lemaire LET and combined ACLR and ALLR. ALLR was performed using the gracilis tendon, whereas the modified Lemaire procedure was performed using the central strip of the iliotibial band. The different states were compared using a Tukey paired comparison test.

RESULTS

In knees with combined deficiency of the ACL and anterolateral structures, anterior translation and internal rotation remained significantly increased after isolated ACLR compared with the intact knee (+2.33 ± 1.44 mm and +1.98° ± 1.06°, respectively; P < .01). On the other hand, the addition of ALLR or modified Lemaire LET to ACLR restored anterior translation and internal rotation to values similar to those in the intact knee. The 2 anterolateral procedures did not show statistically significantly different values for both tests. This difference was 0.67 ± 1.46 mm for anterior translation (P = .79) and 0.11° ± 1.11° for internal rotation (P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

In knees with ACL and anterolateral deficiency, combined ACLR and anterolateral reconstruction restored the native knee stability in anterior translation and internal rotation contrary to isolated ACLR. In addition, both types of extra-articular reconstruction-ALLR and modified Lemaire LET-were similar in terms of restoring knee kinematics, and neither overconstrained the knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In knees with deficiency of the ACL and anterolateral structures, combined ACLR and anterolateral reconstruction increased knee stability at time zero after surgery. This biomechanical improvement could be responsible for the protective effect on ACL graft and meniscal repair reported in the literature after the combined procedure.

Acute ACL reconstruction shows superior clinical results and can be performed safely without an increased risk of developing arthrofibrosis

PURPOSE

To compare acute ACL reconstruction (ACLR) within 8 days of injury with delayed reconstruction after normalized range of motion (ROM), 6-10 weeks after injury. It was hypothesized that acute ACL reconstruction with modern techniques is safe and can be beneficial in terms of patient-reported outcomes and range of motion.

METHODS

The effect of acute and delayed ACLR was randomized studied on 70 patients with high recreational activity level, Tegner level 6 or more, between 2006 and 2013. Patient-reported outcomes, objective IKDC, KOOS, and manual stability measurements were documented during the 24-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

The acute ACLR group did not result in increased stiffness and showed superior outcome regarding strength and how the patient felt their knee functioning at 24 months. In addition, the acute group was not inferior to the delayed group in any assessment. Regarding patient-related outcomes in KOOS, both groups showed significant improvements in all subscales, but no difference was found between the groups. Functional return (FR) rate was almost double compared to the Swedish knee ligament register and treatment failure (TF) rate was reduced by half, no significant difference between the groups. No difference regarding cyclops removal, re-injury of ACL or meniscus was found between the two surgical timing groups.

CONCLUSION

Acute ACLR within 8 days of injury does not appear to adversely affect ROM or result in increased stiffness in the knee joint and was not inferior to the delayed group in any assessment when compared to delayed surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Monitoring changes in knee surface morphology after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery using 3Dsurface scanning

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

BACKGROUND

After surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, recovery to pre-injury levels of knee function is challenging. Postoperative edema and muscle atrophy are common roadblocks to full function and are evident in changes to the surface morphology of the knee. There are currently few accessible objective tools to accurately track these morphological changes.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine if 3D surface scanning can be used to monitor changes in the external shape of the knee after surgery and throughout the rehabilitation process.

METHODS

Thirty participants had 3D surface scans taken of their knee, along with questionnaire-based functional outcomes prior to surgery (baseline), and at two-week, six-week, 12-week, and 26-week timepoints post-surgery. Volumetric changes relative to pre-op were assessed using generalized linear growth models for key anatomical regions and correlated with functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Significant swelling of the patella region compared to baseline was evident immediately after surgery (14%, p < 0.001), before returning to pre-operative levels. Changes in volume at this region were significantly associated with patient-reported functional outcomes. Reductions in volume of the regions corresponding to the vastus medialis and lateralis muscles were significant at 12 weeks post-surgery (p = 0.018 and 0.01 respectively) but returned to baseline levels at six months.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the use of 3D surface scanning as a method for capturing detailed measurements of knee surface morphology after surgery. Significant changes in external morphology are evident during the rehabilitation process.

Stem Cell-Infused Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are unfortunate but common injuries in the athletic population. The standard of care for ACL tears is a surgical intervention to reconstruct the ACL to restore knee functionality as well as quality of life. In recent years, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has seen increasing use in various orthopaedic settings. This increase can be attributed to the potential beneficial qualities that mesenchymal stem cells, progenitor cells, and growth factors, all of which are present in BMAC, can provide. In this technical note and accompanying video, we describe an anatomic allograft ACL reconstruction infused with BMAC to utilize BMAC's potential benefits.

Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a serious injury in patients who are typically young and athletically active, with potential long-term complica- tions including functional limitation, posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is now considered the gold standard of treatment for regaining stability and improving knee function. Conservative treatment is an alternative.

METHODS

To compare operative and conservative treatment, we reviewed pertinent publications retrieved by a systematic search in Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases. PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42017060462 on 31 March 2017.

RESULTS

13 publications concerning a total of 1246 patients were included in the analysis; only two were reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In one of the RCTs, ACL reconstruction was found to yield better functional outcomes than con- servative management. The other RCT did not reveal any harm from initial conser- vative management, although the conservative-to-operative crossover rate in this trial was 51%. The functional outcomes were heterogeneous. In six observational studies, knee function was significantly better after surgery; in seven others, it was not. Five out of nine analyses in which knee-joint stability was restored after surgery showed superior functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction compared to conser- vative management. Three studies in which no satisfactory postoperative knee-joint stability was found did not show any functional difference between surgery and conservative management.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of RCTs published to date, it cannot be definitively con- cluded whether surgery or conservative (expectant) management of ACL rupture yields a better functional outcome. There is a trend in observational studies toward better functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. As an average across studies, conservative treatment fails in 17.5% (± 15.5%) of patients.

Nearly 90% participation in sports activity 12 years after non-surgical management for anterior cruciate ligament injury relates to physical outcome measures

PURPOSE

Traditionally reconstructive surgery is recommended for patients planning to return to sport (RTS), especially to pivoting sports after anterior cruciate (ACL) rupture. Recent trends focus on delaying or avoiding surgery as some studies have found similar rates of RTS following both surgical and conservative management. This study aimed to establish long-term RTS levels in ACL-ruptured individuals treated conservatively, and to investigate the relationship between outcome measures and RTS, in particular, pivoting sports.

METHOD

Fifty-five patients from a cohort of 132 ACL-deficient patients were followed-up for  12 (IQR 8,19) years post injury. Mean-aged 42 years, 22 patients were females and 33 males, 35 had meniscal injuries. Patients were treated with physiotherapy focussing on strength and dynamic stability training and not reconstructive surgery. Return to sport was measured on a 6-point scale. Outcome measures included: objective stability, subjective stability, quadriceps and hamstring strength. Spearman's rho and Chi-square tests were used to assess the relationship between RTS and outcome measures.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine percent of ACL-deficient patients were currently participating in sport despite a 38% increase in anterior translation (p < 0.001) and a 7.5% loss of quadriceps strength (p = 0.004) compared to the contralateral side. Six patients (11%) did not RTS, ten (18%) returned to safe sports, five (9%) returned to running and 16 (29%) to non-strenuous sports involving limited twisting. Eighteen patients (33%) returned to pivoting sports, 12(22%) at recreational level and six (11%) at competitive level. The level of RTS was related to subjective stability (p = 0.002), and to quadriceps and hamstring strength of the injured leg (p < 0.001). Patients able to return to pivoting sports differed significantly from those not doing so in outcome measures including objective (p = 0.022) and subjective stability (p = 0.035), and quadriceps strength (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Eighty-nine percent of ACL-ruptured individuals treated conservatively lead an active sporting life. One-third returned to pivoting sports.  Overall RTS was related to subjective and objective stability and quadriceps and to a lesser extent hamstring strength. This finding reinforced the importance of dynamic stability training as an initial treatment option in most cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of knee sonography and pressure pain threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts in soccer players

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the pressure pain threshold and muscle architecture after an anatomic single bundle reconstruction with quadriceps tendon and hamstring tendon autografts of the anterior cruciate ligament in competitive soccer players. We hypothesized that both procedures will obtain similar outcomes.

Methods

Fifty-one participants were enrolled in this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial and were categorised into two groups: quadriceps tendon (QT) group (23 men and 3 women; mean age 18.7 ± 3.6; BMI 23.0 ± 2.2) or hamstring tendon (HT) group (16 men and 9 women; mean age 19.2 ± 3.6 BMI 23.5 ± 3.5). Both groups followed the same rehabilitation staged protocol. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), as a measure of perceived pain, was obtained in several points of quadriceps and hamstring muscles. Ultrasound imaging measurements were obtained in quadriceps tendon and knee cartilage thickness. Four measurements were taken in this study: baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Results

The analysis of PPT did not find significant differences in both groups × interaction time in the points evaluated: epicondyle (QT = 421.1 ± 184.1 vs HT = 384.7 ± 154.1 kPa), vastus lateralis (QT = 576.2 ± 221.3 vs HT = 560.1 ± 167.7 kPa), vastus medialis (QT = 544.7 ± 198.8 vs HT = 541.1.1 ± 181.77 kPa), patellar tendon (QT = 626.3 ± 221.1 vs HT = 665.0 ± 205.5 kPa), QT (QT = 651.1 ± 276.9 vs HT = 660.0 ± 195.2 kPa).

(QT = 667.8 ± 284.7 vs HT = 648.2 ± 193.4 kPa) injured knee (all P > 0.05). The results of ultrasound imaging did not show significant differences in both groups × interaction time in the thickness of the QT (QT = 9.9 ± 2.4 vs HT = 9.4 ± 1.7 kPa) and patellar cartilage (QT = 3.2 ± 0.6 vs HT = 3.2 ± 0.4 kPa) (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

A QT autograft produces similar results to a HT autograft in ACL reconstructions in terms of pressure pain threshold and ultrasound muscle architecture during the 1-year follow-up.

Level of Evidence

Level I, Therapeutic Study.

Ten-Year Risk Factors for Inferior Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study of 874 Patients From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register

BACKGROUND

Factors relating to the patient and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may help to identify prognostic factors of long-term outcome after reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To determine 10-year risk factors for inferior knee function after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register were extracted for patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2006. Patients who had no data at the 10-year follow-up for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were excluded. Multivariable proportional odds regression modeling was used to assess 10-year patient- and surgery-related risk factors across all the KOOS subscales and the KOOS₄ (mean score of 4 subscales: pain, knee-related symptoms, function in sport and recreation, and knee-related quality of life).

RESULTS

A total of 874 (41%) patients were included (male, 51.5%; median age at the time of ACL reconstruction, 27.5 years [range, 11.2-61.5 years]). An increase in the severity of concomitant articular cartilage injuries resulted in a reduced KOOS on 4 subscales (odds ratio, 0.64-0.80; P < .05). A higher preoperative KOOS pain score increased the odds of a higher score on the pain, symptoms, and sport subscales and the KOOS₄. In addition, a higher preoperative body mass index was a significant risk factor for lower scores on 3 KOOS subscales and the KOOS₄. No patient- or surgery-related predictor was significant across all KOOS subscales.

CONCLUSION

This 10-year risk factor analysis identified several factors that can affect long-term knee function after ACL reconstruction. Most risk factors were related to preoperative patient-reported outcome and potentially modifiable. On the other hand, most of the surgery-related risk factors were nonmodifiable. Nevertheless, this information may be helpful to physicians and physical therapists counseling patients on their expectations of outcome after ACL reconstruction.

Factors that affect patient reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a systematic review of the Scandinavian knee ligament registers

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of findings from the Scandinavian knee ligament registers with regard to factors that affect patient reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and AMED were searched, and 157 studies were identified. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts and full text articles for eligibility. A modified version of the Downs and Black checklist was applied for quality appraisal.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies published from the Scandinavian registers from their establishment in 2004 and onwards that documented patient reported outcome and provided information on concomitant injuries were eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies were included. Younger age at ACL reconstruction, male sex, not smoking and receiving a hamstring tendon autograft positively influenced patient reported outcome. Patients with concomitant cartilage and meniscal injuries reported inferior subjective knee function compared with patients with an isolated ACL tear. One study reported that patients treated non-reconstructively reported inferior knee function compared with patients who had ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Younger age, male sex, not smoking, receiving a hamstring tendon autograft and the absence of concomitant injuries were associated with superior patient reported outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The long-term prognosis and risk factors for quality of life and disability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remain unknown. Hypothesis/Purpose: Our objective was to identify patient-reported outcomes and patient-specific risk factors from a large prospective cohort at a minimum 10-year follow-up after ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that meniscus and articular cartilage injuries, revision ACL reconstruction, subsequent knee surgery, and certain demographic characteristics would be significant risk factors for inferior outcomes at 10 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Therapeutic study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Unilateral ACL reconstruction procedures were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2002 and 2004 from 7 sites in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON). Patients preoperatively completed a series of validated outcome instruments, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Marx activity rating scale. At the time of surgery, physicians documented all intra-articular abnormalities, treatment, and surgical techniques utilized. Patients were followed at 2, 6, and 10 years postoperatively and asked to complete the same outcome instruments that they completed at baseline. The incidence and details of any subsequent knee surgeries were also obtained. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of the outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 1592 patients were enrolled (57% male; median age, 24 years). Ten-year follow-up was obtained on 83% (n = 1320) of the cohort. Both IKDC and KOOS scores significantly improved at 2 years and were maintained at 6 and 10 years. Conversely, Marx scores dropped markedly over time, from a median score of 12 points at baseline to 9 points at 2 years, 7 points at 6 years, and 6 points at 10 years. The patient-specific risk factors for inferior 10-year outcomes were lower baseline scores; higher body mass index; being a smoker at baseline; having a medial or lateral meniscus procedure performed before index ACL reconstruction; undergoing revision ACL reconstruction; undergoing lateral meniscectomy; grade 3 to 4 articular cartilage lesions in the medial, lateral, or patellofemoral compartments; and undergoing any subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery after index ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Patients were able to perform sports-related functions and maintain a relatively high knee-related quality of life 10 years after ACL reconstruction, although activity levels significantly declined over time. Multivariable analysis identified several key modifiable risk factors that significantly influence the outcome.

Clinical outcomes of extra-articular tenodesis/anterolateral reconstruction in the ACL injured knee

PURPOSE

The role of concomitant extra-articular procedures in improving the outcome of ACL reconstruction has experienced a recent resurgence in interest. The aim of this article is to highlight the differences in philosophies and outcomes of historical lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and contemporary, anterolateral reconstruction.

METHODS

A narrative review was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE using the keywords "lateral extra-articular tenodesis" and "anterolateral ligament reconstruction".

RESULTS

Results of search strategy: Thirty-seven studies [13 reporting clinical outcomes of isolated LET in ACL deficient knees and 24 comparing isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with ACLR + LET] and 1 study on anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction were identified as relevant and included in the review. Results of literature review: Isolated extra-articular reconstructions are rarely performed in contemporary practice. They are associated with a high rate of persistent anterior instability and early degenerative change. Combined ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodeses results in a significant reduction in the prevalence of residual pivot shift, but the majority of the studies do not demonstrate any significant difference with respect to patient-reported outcome measures and return to sport. Although several authors report a trend towards decreased graft rupture rates, significant differences were not demonstrated in most studies. In a single clinical study, combined anatomic ACL and anterolateral ligament reconstruction was reported to be associated with a threefold reduction in graft rupture rates and improved return to sport compared to isolated ACL graft choices.

CONCLUSIONS

Historically performed, combined ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodeses are associated with improved knee kinematics. Although trends towards decreased graft rupture rates are reported by several authors, the majority did not demonstrate a significant difference, likely as a result of small and underpowered studies using post-operative immobilisation and delayed rehabilitation protocols. More recently, combined ACLR and ALL reconstruction has been shown to be associated with significant improvements in graft failure and return to sport rates when compared to isolated ACLR. However, these results are from a single clinical series with only medium-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical Outcomes After Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Graft rupture rate, return to sport and persistent rotational instability remain a concern postoperatively following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has recently been shown to act as a lateral knee stabilizer that helps improve rotational stability. To improve functional and clinical outcomes, a combined ACL reconstruction with an associated ALL reconstruction has been proposed.

Purpose

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the combined ACL and ALL reconstruction.

Methods

A literature search in PubMed was performed and papers reporting on clinical outcomes after combined ACL and ALL reconstruction were identified. The inclusion criteria was a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Results

Five studies were included in the review. The overall graft failure rate in patients with ACL and ALL reconstruction was <3% at 2 years minimum after surgery. Comparison analysis in a high-risk population demonstrated that the graft failure rate in combined ACL and ALL reconstruction was 2.5 times lower than with isolated bone-patella tendon-bone graft and 3.1 times lower than with isolated hamstring graft. The medial meniscal repair failure rate was also 2 times lower in the combined ACL and ALL reconstruction group compared with isolated ACL reconstruction. Return to sport and functional outcomes did not show any significant difference between the groups. The rate of reoperations was not increased in patients with combined ACL and ALL reconstruction.

Conclusions

Overall, combined ACL and ALL reconstruction provides promising results that may improve graft rupture rates and meniscal repair failure rates, while maintaining excellent functional outcomes.