Herpes simplex hepatitis after liver transplantation: case report and literature review

Rapid diagnosis of herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 bloodstream infections utilizing a sample-to-answer platform

Bloodstream HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections can cause devastating outcomes with high morbidity and mortality, especially in neonates or immunocompromised individuals. Proper patient management for herpes simplex virus (HSV) bloodstream infections is time-sensitive and requires a rapid, accurate, and definitive diagnosis. The absence of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved molecular assays for HSV detection in blood, coupled with a lack of consensus on the optimal sample type, underscores the unmet need for improved diagnostics. We prospectively compared the cycle threshold values in paired samples including whole blood (WB), plasma, serum, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with bloodstream HSV infections. This analysis employed a modified use of the FDA-cleared Simplexa HSV-1 & 2 Direct assay. The clinical performance in serum was assessed by comparing the results of 247 remnant specimens on this sample-to-answer platform to established laboratory-developed tests in a blinded fashion. Serum samples exhibited significantly lower cycle thresholds than whole blood samples [2.6 cycle threshold (Ct) bias, P < 0.001]. The modified Simplexa assay demonstrated 100% positive percent agreement for the detection of HSV-1 and HSV-2 DNA in serum samples and yielded an overall agreement of 95% (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97), with a κ statistic of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.86) compared to the composite reference method. Discordance rates were 5.20% for HSV-1 and 0.81% for HSV-2. This investigation demonstrates that serum is an optimal specimen type for HSV detection when compared to several blood compartments. Serum offers a promising sample type for rapid and accurate diagnosis of HSV bloodstream infections using the modified Simplexa assay.

IMPORTANCE

Rapid, accurate, and definitive diagnosis of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections is crucial in clinical settings for patient management. The absence of FDA-authorized molecular assays for HSV-1/2 detection in blood, coupled with a lack of consensus on the optimal sample type, underscores the need for improved diagnostic methods. Furthermore, rapid diagnosis of HSV bloodstream infections enables timely administration of antiviral treatment, influences patient management decisions for those at high risk, and can contribute to shorter hospital stays, thereby reducing healthcare costs.

Infections After Liver Transplant -Timeline, Management and Prevention

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard treatment for end- stage liver disease. Patient and graft survival have improved significantly in the last three decades owing to improvement in surgical technique, better perioperative management and better immunosuppressive regimens. However, LT recipients are at increased risk of infections, particularly in the first year after transplantation. The risk of infection is directly proportional to immunosuppressive regimen and graft function. In this review, we will briefly discuss the timeline of infections after liver transplant, preventive strategies and management of infectious complications.

Epidemiology and Management of Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients

Background: Improvements in liver transplant (LT) outcomes are attributed to advances in surgical techniques, use of potent immunosuppressants, and rigorous pre-LT testing. Despite these improvements, post-LT infections remain the most common complication in this population. Bacteria constitute the most common infectious agents, while fungal and viral infections are also frequently encountered. Multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections develop because of polymicrobial overuse and prolonged hospital stays. Immediate post-LT infections are commonly caused by viruses. Conclusions: Appropriate vaccination, screening of both donor and recipients before LT and antiviral prophylaxis in high-risk individuals are recommended. Antimicrobial drug resistance is common in high-risk LT and associated with poor outcomes; epidemiology and management of these cases is discussed. Additionally, we also discuss the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and monkeypox in the LT population.

Viral meningoencephalitis in pediatric solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach

Neurologic complications, both infectious and non-infectious, are frequent among hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Up to 46% of HCT and 50% of SOT recipients experience a neurological complication, including cerebrovascular accidents, drug toxicities, as well as infections. Defects in innate, adaptive, and humoral immune function among transplant recipients predispose to opportunistic infections, including central nervous system (CNS) disease. CNS infections remain uncommon overall amongst HCT and SOT recipients, compromising approximately 1% of total cases among adult patients. Given the relatively lower number of pediatric transplant recipients, the incidence of CNS disease amongst in this population remains unknown. Although infections comprise a small percentage of the neurological complications that occur post-transplant, the associated morbidity and mortality in an immunosuppressed state makes it imperative to promptly evaluate and aggressively treat a pediatric transplant patient with suspicion for viral meningoencephalitis. This manuscript guides the reader through a broad infectious and non-infectious diagnostic differential in a transplant recipient presenting with altered mentation and fever and thereafter, elaborates on diagnostics and management of viral meningoencephalitis. Hypothetical SOT and HCT patient cases have also been constructed to illustrate the diagnostic and management process in select viral etiologies. Given the unique risk for various opportunistic viral infections resulting in CNS disease among transplant recipients, the manuscript will provide a contemporary review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of viral meningoencephalitis in these patients.

Risk of herpes simplex virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: A population-based cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is an opportunistic infection antigen in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, this phenomenon has received limited attention from epidemiologists. Our study aims to determine the HSV infection risk in SOT recipients.

METHODS

This was a nationwide population-based cross-sectional study based on the National Health Insurance Research Database from 2002 to 2015. We used propensity score matching to avoid selection bias and analyzed the association between HSV infection and SOT recipients with multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

At a 3-year follow-up, SOT recipients had a higher risk of developing HSV, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.28 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.51-4.29). Moreover, at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups, SOT recipients also had an increased risk of HSV than general patients with aORs of 3.85 (95% CI, 2.29-6.49), 4.27 (95% CI, 2.86-6.36), and 3.73 (95% CI, 2.74-5.08), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, lung transplant recipients (aOR = 8.01; 95% CI, 2.39-26.88) exhibited a significantly higher chance of HSV among SOT recipients, followed by kidney transplant recipients (aOR = 3.33; 95% CI, 2.11-5.25) and liver transplant recipients (aOR = 3.15; 95% CI, 2.28-4.34).

CONCLUSION

HSV can develop at any time after organ transplantation. SOT recipients had a higher risk of HSV infection than the general population at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after transplantation, with the highest chance at 1 year after. In addition, the patients who underwent lung transplantion were at higher risk for HSV infection than liver or kidney transplant recipients.

Donor-derived fulminant herpes simplex virus hepatitis after liver transplantation: Two cases and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Fulminant herpetic hepatitis due to herpes simplex virus (HSV), serotype 1 or 2, is a rare but often fatal complication after solid organ transplantation (SOT). HSV hepatitis in SOT recipients can occur either due to primary infection acquired post transplantation, viral reactivation in a seropositive patient, or as donor-derived infection. Cases of fatal hepatitis have been reported in the liver as well as in other SOT recipients. The fatal outcome is mostly due to delayed diagnosis and treatment, which is explained by the lack of clinical specificity of HSV hepatitis.

METHODS

We report two cases of fatal donor-derived HSV hepatitis in liver-transplanted recipients. We reviewed all published cases of donor-derived HSV infections after SOT with an evaluation of the presence of prophylaxis and outcome.

RESULTS

In both liver recipients, the retrospective determination of HSV serostatus was negative, and both cases occurred in the absence of cytomegalovirus or HSV prophylaxis. A review of the literature showed a significant series of cases of severe hepatitis, mostly fatal, as well as the absence of specific preventive therapy guidelines in cases of HSV serology mismatch.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of two fatal donor-derived hepatitis made the Swiss Transplant Infectious Diseases working group modify its national recommendations regarding pretransplant serostatus determination and HSV prophylaxis after liver transplantation. Further studies are needed to assess this approach.

PRIMARY HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS TYPE 1 INFECTION WITH ACUTE LIVER FAILURE IN SOLID ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION: REPORT OF THREE CASES AND REVIEW

Herpes virus infections is not uncommon in solid organ transplantation patients. We report 3 cases with primary Herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV1) infection with acute liver failure (ALF). This is a rare and potentially fatal entity that could be a donor-derived infection. Although the initial clinical presentation is non-specific, it should be considered as a differential diagnosis in HSV-negative serology patients with liver failure and empirical treatment must be started in combination with a drastic reduction of immunosuppression. A strategy of HSV prophylaxis for pre-transplant HSV seronegative patients must be stablished in order to reduce the risk of clinical disease.

•

HSV hepatitis is a rare and fatal entity that can be a donor-derived infection.

•

It should be suspected in highly immunosuppressed transplant patients who develop acute liver failure.

•

The treatment delay is associated with higher fatality.

•

In transplant patients with negative HSV serology, prophylaxis is recommended if they are not with prophylaxis for CMV.

Newer developments in viral hepatitis: Looking beyond hepatotropic viruses

Viral hepatitis in the entirety of its clinical spectrum is vast and most discussion are often restricted to hepatotropic viral infections, including hepatitis virus (A to E). With the advent of more advanced diagnostic techniques, it has now become possible to diagnose patients with non-hepatotropic viral infection in patients with hepatitis. Majority of these viruses belong to the Herpes family, with characteristic feature of latency. With the increase in the rate of liver transplantation globally, especially for the indication of acute hepatitis, it becomes even more relevant to identify non hepatotropic viral infection as the primary hepatic insult. Immunosuppression post-transplant is an established cause of reactivation of a number of viral infections that could then indirectly cause hepatic injury. Antiviral agents may be utilized for treatment of most of these infections, although data supporting their role is derived primarily from case reports. There are no current guidelines to manage patients suspected to have viral hepatitis secondary to non-hepatotropic viral infection, a gap that needs to be addressed. In this review article, the authors analyze the common non hepatotropic viral infections contributing to viral hepatitis, with emphasis on recent advances on diagnosis, management and role of liver transplantation.

Oral diseases after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of liver transplantation on the occurrence and frequency of oral diseases in humans.Data sources The study query was performed on Medline/PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library and Embase databases, including the grey literature.Data selection Observational studies comparing the frequency of oral manifestations in post-liver transplantation patients versus reference population were eligible for inclusion.Data extraction and analysis The article selection, data extraction and quality assessment were executed by three independent investigators. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out for computation of relative risks of oral malignancies (standardised incidence ratio [SIR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]).Data synthesis Among 248 studies identified, 11 met the eligibility criteria and six were included in the meta-analysis. Opportunistic fungal infections (Candida spp.) and lesions with malignant potential were reported to be more frequently prevalent after liver transplantation. Calculations indicated that after liver transplantation, the patients have a fivefold increased risk for oral cancer occurrence compared to the general population (SIR = 5.006; 95% CI 2.803 to 8.94; p <0.001).Conclusions The findings suggest that liver transplantation increases the risk of oral malignancies and the frequency of other mucosal lesions.

Hepatic Manifestations of Nonhepatotropic Infectious Agents Including Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2, Adenovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, and Coxiella burnetii

Nonhepatotropic viruses such as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, flaviviruses, filoviruses, and human herpes virus, and bacteria such as Coxiella burnetii, can cause liver injury mimicking acute hepatitis. Most of these organisms cause a self-limited infection. However, in immunocompromised patients, they can cause severe hepatitis or in some cases fulminant hepatic failure requiring an urgent liver transplant. Hepatic dysfunction is also commonly seen in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. Patients with preexisting liver diseases are likely at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may be associated with poor outcomes.

Donor-derived herpes simplex virus hepatitis in a kidney transplant recipient and review of the literature

Donor-derived (DD) herpes simplex virus (HSV) hepatitis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is extremely uncommon but carries a high mortality rate. The diagnosis is challenging due to the non-specific presentation and lack of clinical suspicion. We report a case of DDHSV hepatitis in a HSV2 pre-transplant seronegative kidney recipient who received the organ from a HSV2 seropositive donor. The case is highlighted by a few unusual features, namely severe thrombocytopenia and the development of cutaneous, oral and esophageal HSV lesions several weeks after symptom onset while recovering on appropriate treatment. A review of nine proven and probable DDHSV hepatitis cases (including eight previously published ones) showed that fever is a common presenting feature while gastrointestinal symptoms and cutaneous manifestations are uncommon. The symptoms almost always occurred within 2 weeks of transplant. Six out of the nine DDHSV hepatitis patients, including five patients who were on appropriate treatment, died within a month after transplant.

Herpes simplex virus infections in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of HSV in the pre- and post-transplant period. A majority of transplant recipients are seropositive for HSV-1 or 2. Compared with immunocompetent persons, SOT recipients shed HSV more frequently, have more severe clinical manifestations, and are slower to respond to therapy. Most HSV infection is diagnosed on clinical grounds, but patients may present with atypical lesions and/or other clinical manifestations. Acquisition from the donor is rare. Polymerase chain reaction is the preferred diagnostic test unless culture is needed for resistance testing. For limited mucocutaneous lesions, oral therapy can be used; however, in severe, disseminated, visceral or CNS involvement, acyclovir doses of up to 10 mg/kg every 8 hours intravenously should be initiated. Acyclovir-resistant HSV is less common in SOT patients than in HSCT and can be treated with foscarnet, though other novel therapies are currently under investigation. HSV-specific prophylaxis should be considered for all HSV-1 and HSV-2-seropositive organ recipients who are not receiving antiviral medication for CMV prevention that has activity against HSV.

Unusual oral presentation of HSV-1 lesions in an adult liver transplant recipient

Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) hepatitis in liver transplant patients is a rarely reported infective complication of HSV with severe consequences, often leading to fulminant hepatitis if left untreated. The clinical signs are often atypical, leading to under-reporting in the literature and potential delays in treatment. Our case report describes such atypical mucocutaneous lesions in a liver transplant recipient. We highlight the need for further reports, especially those with images, in order to aid the diagnosis of HSV infection, and to allow prompt treatment to prevent complications such as HSV hepatitis.

Acute Viral Hepatitis: Beyond A, B, and C

From the standpoint of the surgical pathologist "hepatitis" is defined as the set of histologic patterns of lesions found in livers infected by hepatotropic viruses, by non-hepatotrophic viruses leading to liver inflammation in the context of systemic infection, or due to an autoimmune disease, drug, or toxin involving the liver. This article is centered on the histologic patterns of injury in acute viral hepatitis, encompassing the hepatotropic viruses A, B, C, D, and E and the "icteric hemorrhagic fevers" (dengue, hantavirus, yellow fever). A brief mention of viruses causing hepatitis in immunosuppressed patients also is presented.

PGG impairs herpes simplex virus type 1 infection via blocking capsid assembly

Aim: Pentagalloylglucose (PGG), a hydrolyzable polyphenol was isolated from Phyllanthus emblica, which exhibited a strong inhibitory activity on HSV-1 infection, but its underlying mechanisms have not been completely delineated. Results/methodology: Using TEM, we first observed that PGG blocked the formation and maturation of HSV-1 capsid particles. Hence, we engaged in exploring the molecular mechanisms of PGG on the capsid assembly. At last, we found that PGG also blocked the relocalization of capsid proteins from the cytoplasm to the nucleus where the assembly took place. Conclusion: The current studies, for the first time, demonstrated acetylated microtubules were needed at this process of capsid proteins nuclear translocation. PGG also impairs herpes simplex virus type 1 infection by blocking capsid assembly.

Herpes simplex virus-2 transmission following solid organ transplantation: Donor-derived infection and transplantation from prior organ recipients

BACKGROUND

Owing to limited availability of donor organs, previous solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are increasingly considered as potential organ donors. We report donor-derived transmission of herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) to two clusters of SOT recipients with transmission from the original donor and an HSV-2-infected recipient who subsequently became a donor.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of the donors and recipients in both clusters. Pre-transplant serology and virological features of HSV-2 were characterized. Genotyping of HSV-2 isolates to determine potential for donor transmission of HSV-2 through transplantation of organs from prior organ recipients was performed.

RESULTS

A kidney-pancreas recipient died day 9 post transplant. Following confirmation of brain death, the lungs and recently transplanted kidney were donated to two further recipients. The liver was not retrieved, but biopsy confirmed HSV-2 infection. Testing on the original donor showed negative HSV-2 polymerase chain reaction and HSV immunoglobulin (Ig)M, but positive HSV-2 IgG. The liver recipient from the original donor developed HSV-2 hepatitis and cutaneous infection that responded to treatment with intravenous acyclovir. In the second cluster, lung and kidney recipients both developed HSV-2 viremia that was successfully treated with antiviral therapy. Genotyping of all HSV-2-positive samples showed 100% sequence homology for three recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-derived HSV infection affected two clusters of recipients because of transplantation of organs from a prior organ recipient. HSV should be considered as a possible cause of illness in febrile SOT recipients in the immediate post-transplant period and may cause disseminated disease and re-infection in HSV-2-seropositive recipients. Testing of HSV serology and prophylaxis may be considered in SOT recipients not receiving cytomegalovirus prophylaxis.

A unique presentation of acute liver failure from herpes simplex virus hepatitis

We present the case of a patient, with history of myelodysplastic syndrome and recent bone marrow transplant, who developed fulminant liver failure secondary to herpes simplex virus (HSV) hepatitis. His presentation was unique, as findings of liver microabscesses on computed tomography scan have not been described previously in this patient population. Despite initial treatment with acyclovir, he continued to deteriorate, and later sensitivities found the HSV strain to be resistant to acyclovir. HSV hepatitis with secondary liver failure is rare and, without appropriate treatment, its mortality is >80%. Early suspicion and immediate therapy are the keys to improve patient survival.