Decreased immunoglobulin G levels after living-donor liver transplantation is a risk factor for bacterial infection and sepsis

Effect of Early Enteral Nutrition on Graft Loss After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elucidate the effect of early enteral nutrition on graft loss within 12 h after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using propensity score-matching analysis and subsequently examine the risk factors for graft loss after LDLT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 467 LDLT patients who were assigned to the early and non-early groups based on the optimal cutoff value of 12 h for the starting time of early enteral nutrition after LDLT to predict graft loss.

RESULTS

The 1-year graft survival rate of the early group before propensity score-matching was 92.1%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rate of the non-early group was 86.2%. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .067). The incidences of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), small-for-size graft (SFSG) syndrome, acute cellular rejection (ACR), and sepsis were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P = .12, .91, .46, and .056, respectively). After propensity score-matching, the 1-year graft survival rate of the early group was 94.4%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rate of the non-early group was 85.4% (P = .034). The incidences of EAD, SFSG syndrome, and ACR were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P = .43, .81, and .24, respectively). However, the incidence of sepsis was statistically different between the 2 groups (non-early: 10.7% vs early: 3.6%, P = .038).

CONCLUSION

Early enteral nutrition within 12 h after LDLT may contribute to better graft survival in LDLT patients by preventing sepsis.

Dual Antibody Treatment for Simultaneous Acute Cellular Rejection and Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation is uncommon but sometimes has a grave prognosis. We herein describe a 40-year-old man who developed simultaneous acute cellular rejection and acute AMR due to de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after living donor liver transplantation. He underwent living donor liver transplantation with his brother-in-law as the donor. Hepatic function deteriorated on postoperative day 6, and a liver biopsy revealed histologic findings of typical acute cellular rejection. However, steroid pulse therapy and thymoglobulin did not produce a clinical response, and his liver function dramatically deteriorated on postoperative day 13 (aspartate aminotransferase, 2787 IU/L; total bilirubin, 14.1 mg/dL). We diagnosed acute AMR based on positive immunohistochemical staining for C4d in portal areas and added plasma exchange and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin after rituximab. The patient's clinical state improved and ultimately resolved. To our knowledge, this is the first report of dual antibody treatment for simultaneous acute cellular rejection and acute AMR induced by de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Despite his fulminant clinical course, we successfully rescued the recipient with immediate anti-humoral therapy. The rapid treatment decision and adequate understanding of the mechanisms of anti-humoral therapy were crucial to overcoming acute AMR in this case.

The Role of Microbiota in Liver Transplantation and Liver Transplantation-Related Biliary Complications

Liver transplantation as a treatment option for end-stage liver diseases is associated with a relevant risk for complications. On the one hand, immunological factors and associated chronic graft rejection are major causes of morbidity and carry an increased risk of mortality due to liver graft failure. On the other hand, infectious complications have a major impact on patient outcomes. In addition, abdominal or pulmonary infections, and biliary complications, including cholangitis, are common complications in patients after liver transplantation and can also be associated with a risk for mortality. Thereby, these patients already suffer from gut dysbiosis at the time of liver transplantation due to their severe underlying disease, causing end-stage liver failure. Despite an impaired gut-liver axis, repeated antibiotic therapies can cause major changes in the gut microbiome. Due to repeated biliary interventions, the biliary tract is often colonized by several bacteria with a high risk for multi-drug resistant germs causing local and systemic infections before and after liver transplantation. Growing evidence about the role of gut microbiota in the perioperative course and their impact on patient outcomes in liver transplantation is available. However, data about biliary microbiota and their impact on infectious and biliary complications are still sparse. In this comprehensive review, we compile the current evidence for the role of microbiome research in liver transplantation with a focus on biliary complications and infections due to multi-drug resistant germs.

Survival Outcome of Sepsis in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplant

Sepsis is a complex disease stemming from a dysregulated immune response toward an infectious agent. In transplantation, sepsis remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Solid organ transplant recipients have impaired adaptive immunity due to immunosuppression required to prevent rejection. Immunosuppression has unintended consequences, such as increasing the risk of infections and sepsis. Due to its high morbidity and mortality, early detection of sepsis is paramount to start aggressive treatment. Several biomarkers or combination of biomarkers of sepsis have emerged in the last decade, but they are not dependable for early diagnosis or for outcome prognosis.

The Contribution of Serum Complement Component 3 Levels to 90-Day Mortality in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

The contributions of the complement system have been elucidated in the process of solid organ transplantation, including kidney transplantation. However, the role of complement in liver transplantation is unknown. We sought to elucidate the time-dependent changes of peritransplantational serum complement levels and the relationships with posttransplant outcomes and other immunological biomarkers. We enrolled 82 patients who underwent living-related donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Nine patients (11%) died within 90 days after LDLT (non-survivors). The following immunomarkers were collected preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 4 week(s) after LDLT: serum C3, C4, immunoglobulin G (IgG), and peripheral blood leukocyte populations characterized by CD3, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD56. Consequently, C3 and C4 increased time-dependently after LDLT. Preoperatively, C3 was negatively correlated with the MELD score, Child–Pugh score, CD16-positive leukocyte percentage, and the CD56-positive leukocyte percentage. Non-survivors had lower levels of C3 at 2 weeks in comparison to survivors (median [interquartile range]: 56 [49-70] mg/dL vs. 88 [71-116] mg/dL, p=0.0059). When the cutoff value of C3 at 2 weeks to distinguish non-survivors was set to 71 mg/dL, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve were 87.5%, 75.0%, and 0.80, respectively. A principal component analysis showed an inverse relationship between the C3 and C4 levels and the percentage of CD8-, CD16-, and CD56-positive leukocytes at 1 and 2 week(s). All non-survivors were included in the cluster that showed higher percentages of CD8-, CD16-, and CD56-positive leukocytes at 2 weeks. In conclusion, we demonstrated the relationship between complement, outcomes, and other immunomarkers in LDLT and suggested the usefulness of C3 at 2 weeks after LDLT in distinguishing the mortality.

Infection within 2 weeks before liver transplantation closely related to prognosis of posttransplant infection: A single-center retrospective observational study in China

BACKGROUND

Infections still represent the main factors influencing morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for infection and survival after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined medical records in 210 liver recipients who underwent liver transplantation between April 2015 and October 2017 in our hospital. Clinical manifestations and results of pathogen detection test were used to define infection. We analyzed the prevalence, risk factors and prognosis of patients with infection.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 214 days; the incidence of infection after liver transplantation was 46.7% (n = 98) which included pneumonia (43.4%), biliary tract infection (21.9%), peritonitis (21.4%) and bloodstream infection (7.6%). Among the pathogens in pneumonia, the most frequently isolated was Acinetobacter baumanii (23.5%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (21.2%). Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (OR = 1.083, 95% CI: 1.045-1.123; P < 0.001), biliary complication (OR = 4.725, 95% CI: 1.119-19.947; P = 0.035) and duration of drainage tube (OR = 1.040, 95% CI: 1.007-1.074; P = 0.017) were independent risk factors for posttransplant infection. All-cause mortality was 11.0% (n = 23). The prognostic factors for postoperative infection in liver recipients were prior-transplant infection, especially pneumonia within 2 weeks before transplantation. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival showed that recipients within 2 weeks prior infection had a significantly lower cumulative survival rate compared with those without infection (65.2% vs. 90.0%; hazard ratio: 4.480; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection, especially pneumonia within 2 weeks before transplantation, complication with impaired renal function and MELD score after 7 days of transplantation was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative infection in liver transplant recipients.

Bile microbiota: new insights into biliary complications in liver transplant recipients

Background

Biliary complications represent a major problem associated with liver transplantation. This report represents the first study to use high-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing to assess bile microbiota within bile samples of liver transplant recipients with biliary complications. Our goal in this report was to identify the species and abundance of microbes and examine the potential for microbial involvement of bile in liver transplantation patients with biliary complications.

Methods

Liver transplant recipients treated at our center over the period from September 2015 to June 2017 were enrolled in the study. Patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups, control (N=13) and symptom (N=10). Sequencing of 16s rDNA was then performed on bile samples from both groups.

Results

The main bacterial phyla of bile samples in the symptom group included Proteobacteria (55.19%), Firmicutes (32.36%), Actinobacteria (10.24%) and Bacteroidetes (1.23%) and the main bacterial genera were Pseudomonas (23.31%), Klebsiella (18.42%), Lactococcus (9.61%), Rhodococcus (9.59%) and Rhizobium (5.08%). Proteobacteria and Staphylococcus were enriched in the symptom group (P<0.05), whereas Firmicutes (P<0.05) and Enterococcus (P<0.01) were enriched in the control group. Pathways involved as determined with use of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), revealed that metabolism pathways of glyoxylate and dicarboxylate, porphyrin and chlorophyll, arginine and proline, glycine, serine and threonine, as well as the bacterial secretion system were all enriched in bile samples from the symptom group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Clear differences exist in microbial species distribution in bile samples from the symptom versus control group. The species and pathways enriched in bile samples within the symptom group may be involved in the pathogenesis of biliary complication after liver transplantation.

Clinical outcomes of polyvalent immunoglobulin use in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis - Part II: Non-kidney transplant

Immunoglobulin (IG) is commonly used to desensitize and treat antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The impact of IG on other outcomes such as infection, all-cause mortality, graft rejection, and graft loss is not clear. We conducted a similar systematic review and meta-analysis to our previously reported Part I excluding kidney transplant. A comprehensive literature review found 16 studies involving the following organ types: heart (6), lung (4), liver (4), and multiple organs (2). Meta-analysis could only be performed on mortality outcome in heart and lung studies due to inadequate data on other outcomes. There was a significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.34 [0.17-0.69]; 4 studies, n = 455) in heart transplant with hypogammaglobulinemia receiving IVIG vs no IVIG. Mortality in lung transplant recipients with hypogammaglobulinemia receiving IVIG was comparable to those of no hypogammaglobulinemia (OR 1.05 [0.49, 2.26]; 2 studies, n = 887). In summary, IVIG targeted prophylaxis may decrease mortality in heart transplant recipients as compared to those with hypogammaglobulinemia not receiving IVIG, or improve mortality to the equivalent level with those without hypogammaglobulinemia in lung transplant recipients, but there is a lack of data to support physicians in making decisions around using immunoglobulins in all SOT recipients for infection prophylaxis.

Clinical use of an immune monitoring panel in liver transplant recipients: A prospective, observational study

Immunosuppressive therapy greatly contributed to making liver transplantation the standard treatment for end-stage liver diseases. However, it remains difficult to predict and measure the efficacy of pharmacological immunosuppression. Therefore, we used a panel of standardized, commonly available, biomarkers with the aim to describe their changes in the first 3 weeks after the transplant procedure and assess if they may help therapeutic drug monitoring in better tailoring the dose of the immunosuppressive drugs. We prospectively studied 72 consecutive patients from the day of liver transplant (post-operative day #0) until the post-operative day #21. Leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes (CD4+, CD8+), natural killer cells, monocytes, immunoglobulins and tacrolimus serum levels were measured on peripheral blood (at day 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 after surgery). Patients who developed infections showed significantly higher CD64+ monocytes on post operative day #7. IgG levels were lower on post operative day #3 among patients who later developed infections. We also found that a sharp decrease in IgA from post operative day #0 to 3 (-226 mg/dL in the ROC curve analysis) strongly correlates with the onset of infections among HCV- patients. No specific markers of rejection emerged from the tested panel of markers. Our results show that some early changes in peripheral blood white cells and immunoglobulins may predict the onset of infections and may be useful in modulating the immunosuppressive therapy. However, a panel of commonly available, standardized biomarkers do not support in improving therapeutic drug monitoring ability to individualize immunosuppressive drugs dosing.

Risk Factors for Sepsis Based on Sepsis-3 Criteria after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Sepsis is a common complication of solid organ transplant procedures and, in particular, can affect the prognosis of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This retrospective study determined the pre-, peri-, and postoperative risk factors for sepsis after OLT, using as reference the 2016 Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Pre-, peri-, and postoperative clinical data of the sepsis-positive (n = 85) and sepsis-negative (n = 41) groups were analyzed for potential risk factors of OLT-related sepsis. The sepsis-positive patients had a significantly higher rate of dialysis (49.4%), longer time under mechanical ventilation (1.5 d), higher hospitalization costs (0.41 million RMB), and worse survival rate (68.5%), compared with the sepsis-negative patients (4.8%, 1 d, 0.30 million RMB, and 73.1%, resp.). The multivariate logistic analysis identified the following as risk factors for OLT-related sepsis: preoperative Child-Pugh grade C (OR 10.43; 95% CI 2.081–52.292; P = 0.004), preoperative hypercalcemia (OR 6.372; 95% CI 1.693–23.98; P = 0.006), and perioperative acidosis (OR 6.364; 95% CI 1.196–33.869; P = 0.030). Patients with preoperative Child-Pugh grade C, preoperative hypercalcemia, or perioperative acidosis are at higher risk for developing sepsis after OLT. When any of these problems occur, timely sepsis management should be planned.

Evaluation of humoral immunity profiles to identify heart recipients at risk for development of severe infections: A multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND

New biomarkers are necessary to improve detection of the risk of infection in heart transplantation. We performed a multicenter study to evaluate humoral immunity profiles that could better enable us to identify heart recipients at risk of severe infections.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 170 adult heart recipients at 8 centers in Spain. Study points were before transplantation and 7 and 30 days after transplantation. Immune parameters included IgG, IgM, IgA and complement factors C3 and C4, and titers of specific antibody to pneumococcal polysaccharide antigens (anti-PPS) and to cytomegalovirus (CMV). To evaluate potential immunologic mechanisms leading to IgG hypogammaglobulinemia, before heart transplantation we assessed serum B-cell activating factor (BAFF) levels using enzyme-linked immunoassay. The clinical follow-up period lasted 6 months. Clinical outcome was need for intravenous anti-microbials for therapy of infection.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 53 patients (31.2%) developed at least 1 severe infection. We confirmed that IgG hypogammaglobulinemia at Day 7 (defined as IgG <600 mg/dl) is a risk factor for infection in general, bacterial infections in particular, and CMV disease. At Day 7 after transplantation, the combination of IgG <600 mg/dl + C3 <80 mg/dl was more strongly associated with the outcome (adjusted odds ratio 7.40; 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 37.03; p = 0.014). We found that quantification of anti-CMV antibody titers and lower anti-PPS antibody concentrations were independent predictors of CMV disease and bacterial infections, respectively. Higher pre-transplant BAFF levels were a risk factor of acute cellular rejection.

CONCLUSION

Early immunologic monitoring of humoral immunity profiles proved useful for the identification of heart recipients who are at risk of severe infection.

Fc-Gamma Receptor Polymorphisms Predispose Patients to Infectious Complications After Liver Transplantation

We investigated the impact of polymorphisms in host innate immunoregulatory genes on the development of infectious complications after liver transplantation (LT). The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of C1QA [276A/G], FCGR2A [131H/R], and FCGR3A [158F/V], genes encoding the Fc gamma receptor (FcγR), were analyzed in 89 living donor LT recipients in relation to the occurrences of postoperative infectious complications within 30 days after LT. Consistent with a lower affinity of the isoform encoded by FCGR3A [158F] to both IgG1 and IgG3, a significantly higher incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) was observed in the FCGR3A [158F/V or F/F] than in the FCGR3A [158V/V] individuals. The combination of FCGR2A and FCGR3A SNPs further stratified the incidence of BSI, regardless of C1QA SNP. The predominant causative pathogen of BSI in the FCGR3A [158F/F or F/V] patients was gram-positive cocci (73.3%), of which one third was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. No differences were observed in the incidence of fungal infections or in cytomegalovirus infections with respect to the three gene polymorphisms. Our findings indicate that FcγR SNPs are predisposing factors for BSI and can predict mortality after LT. This study provides a foundation for further prospective studies on a larger scale.