Combination antifungal treatment for invasive fungal disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with hematological disorders

Ultrasonography is an effective method for evaluating hepatosplenic fungal infections in pediatric onco-hematological patients

PURPOSE

This prospective study assessed the value of ultrasonography (US) in the evaluation of hepatosplenic fungal infections (HSFI).

METHODS

Thirty-two pediatric participants with confirmed onco-hematological diseases and HSFI were included. Lesions in the liver and/or spleen were detected by US, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

Of the participants, 11 (34%) had confirmed HSFI, while 21 (66%) had highly suspected HSFI. The US, CT, MRI, and fungal blood cultures demonstrated positive results in 31, 19, 25, and 7 patients, respectively. US had a significantly higher detection rate than CT, MRI, and fungal blood cultures (p < 0.05). The "bull's eye" phenomenon was a distinctive US feature of HSFI. Follow-up examinations indicated that after a mean of 7.7 (1-15) months, liver and/or spleen lesions disappeared in five patients. The lesion was significantly smaller in 10 patients. Residual calcifications were detected in 15 patients. Two patients died.

CONCLUSION

Conclusively, the US may substitute for tissue biopsy, other imaging modalities, or fungal blood culture for the confirmation of HSFI, and may guide better antifungal treatment, thus achieving better outcomes.

An update on pharmacotherapy for fungal infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

AREAS COVERED

We describe epidemiology, causes and risk factors of IFD in allogeneic HSCT discussing prophylaxis and treatment in various HSCT phases. We present the most recent studies on this thematic area, including novel data on currently available antifungals, i.e. formulations, dosing, safety, efficacy and therapeutic drug monitoring. Finally, we present the most recent relevant recommendations published. Literature search included PubMed, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov between January 2014 and April 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

The antifungal agents employed for prophylaxis and therapy should be predicated on local epidemiology of IFD. Fluconazole prophylaxis remains a first-line choice before engraftment when the main pathogen is Candida spp. After engraftment, prophylaxis should be with mold-active agents (i.e. triazoles). For candidiasis, echinocandins are suggested as first-line treatment, whereas aspergillosis responds well to mold-active azoles and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). For mucormycosis, treatment of choice includes L-AmB and isavuconazole. Choice between fever-driven and diagnostics-driven strategies remains equivocal. Open research topics remain: 1) optimization of tools to ensure prompt and accurate IFD diagnosis to avoid unnecessary exposure to antifungals, drug interactions and cost; 2) refinement of treatment for resistant/refractory strains.

Evaluation of Empiric Voriconazole Dosing and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients

SUMMARY

Invasive fungal infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children with immunodeficiencies. Current dosing recommendations for voriconazole often result in subtherapeutic exposure in pediatric patients. In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed hospitalized pediatric patients receiving voriconazole with at least one inpatient serum trough concentration measured. Patient characteristics and voriconazole dosing courses with associated trough concentrations were summarized for all patients as well as grouped by age (0 to 1 y, 2 to 11 y, and 12 to 18 y). Of 106 included patients, the median age was 9 years (range, 29 d to 18 y). Five hundred ninety courses of voriconazole were administered with 365 associated troughs. Most troughs were subtherapeutic (49%) and 30% of patients never attained a therapeutic trough. The median oral daily dose associated with a therapeutic trough was higher in younger age groups: 21.6 mg/kg 0 to 1 year, 17.9 mg/kg 2 to 11, and 9.5 mg/kg 12 to 18 years ( P <0.001). Patients younger than 2 years had the largest proportion of subtherapeutic troughs and variability in dosing. Attainment of therapeutic voriconazole concentrations was challenging across all pediatric age groups. Higher starting doses for patients younger than 2 years are likely needed.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Antifungals as Empirical, Preemptive, and Targeted Therapies for Invasive Fungal Infections in Intensive-Care Units

Purpose

To determine whether combinations of antifungal drugs are effective and safe for patients in intensive-care units.

Methods

This study compared the efficacy and safety of caspofungin (CAS), voriconazole (VOR), amphotericin B liposome (L-AmB), CAS+VOR, and CAS+L-AmB as empirical, preemptive, and targeted therapies for invasive fungal infection (IFI).

Results

Comparing the CAS, VOR, and CAS+VOR groups revealed that there were no differences in response rates between all therapy types, IFI-associated death within 90 days was less common in the CAS+VOR group (1.8%) than the VOR group (14.3%), and there were more adverse events in the VOR group than in the CAS group (P < 0.05). For empirical or preemptive therapy, the CAS group had a better response rate (80.0%) than the CAS+VOR group (47.1%), and there were more adverse events in the VOR group than in the CAS group (P < 0.05). For targeted therapy, no differences were found for efficacy and safety. There were no differences among the CAS, L-AmB, and CAS+L-AmB groups in efficacy and safety.

Conclusion

Patients who received CAS monotherapy as an empirical or preemptive therapy could achieve good outcomes. Patients who received CAS+VOR or CAS+L-AmB achieved almost the same outcomes when compared with those who received CAS, VOR, and L-AmB monotherapy as targeted therapies, but those who received CAS+VOR had a lower IFI mortality rate than did those who received VOR monotherapy.