The burden of cytomegalovirus infection remains high in high-risk kidney transplant recipients despite six-month valganciclovir prophylaxis

Risk of Cytomegalovirus Viremia Following Transplantation of Hepatitis C-Viremic Donor Kidneys Into Uninfected Recipients: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested an increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia among Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-uninfected recipients of kidney transplants from HCV-RNA+ deceased donors (HCV D+/R-), but these studies featured small sample sizes and limited ability to address confounding variables.

METHODS

We assembled a retrospective cohort of adult kidney transplant recipients at five US centers between 4/1/2015 and 12/31/2020 to determine the association between HCV D+/R- transplants and the outcomes of CMV viremia (> 1000 IU/mL), death-censored graft failure, and mortality in the first posttransplant year compared to HCV D-/R- transplants. We generated highly similar matched cohorts of HCV D+/R- and HCV D-/R- recipients based on attributes that affect the risk of CMV viremia. We matched exactly on center, CMV donor/recipient serostatus, and antibody induction therapy.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 275 HCV D+/R- recipients with a mean age of 52.5 years (SD = 10.7); 19% were CMV D+/R-, and 74% received anti-thymocyte globulin induction. With variable ratio matching, 267 HCV D+/R- recipients were matched to 996 HCV D-/R- recipients. CMV viremia occurred in 15% of HCV D+/R- and 11% of HCV D-R- recipients. In Cox regression, transplantation with an HCV-RNA+ donor kidney was not associated with a significantly higher risk of CMV viremia (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.89-1.92) or death-censored graft loss (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.31-1.2).

CONCLUSION

The risk of CMV viremia was not significantly increased among HCV D+/R- kidney recipients. Future studies should examine associations between donor-derived HCV infection and clinical outcomes of CMV syndrome and disease.

High burden of CMV infections after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation-a nationwide cohort study

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain a common problem after solid-organ transplantation. We characterized the burden of CMV infections, and adverse events of CMV prophylaxis after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). We included all SPK patients (n = 236) since 2010 in our country. Immunosuppression was ATG, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was given to all CMV D+/R- patients for six months, and to seropositive SPK patients for three months since February 2019. CMV DNAemia was monitored with quantitative PCR from plasma. Among D+/R- SPK recipients, post prophylaxis CMV infection was detected in 41/60 (68%) during follow-up. In seropositive SPK recipients with no prophylaxis, CMV infection was detected in 53/95 (56%), vs. 28/78 (36%) in those who received 3 months of prophylaxis (P = 0.01). CMV was symptomatic in 35 (15%) patients, of which 10 required hospitalization. Mean duration of viremia was 28 days (IQR 21-41). Leukopenia was detected in 63 (46%) of the 138 patients with valganciclovir prophylaxis. 7/122 (6%) of the CMV infections detected were defined as refractory to treatment, and three patients had confirmed ganciclovir resistance. SPK recipients experience a high burden of CMV infections despite CMV prophylaxis. Leukopenia is common during valganciclovir prophylaxis.

What's New: Updates on Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may be worsening with the proportion of high-risk D+/R- solid organ transplantation recipients increasing in some regions globally. Cohort studies continue to support either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy as effective prevention strategies. Letermovir prophylaxis was noninferior to valganciclovir in adult high-risk D+/R- kidney transplant recipients with fewer drug-related adverse events in a recent clinical trial and has now been approved for such use in some regions. Maribavir preemptive therapy failed to demonstrate noninferiority when compared with valganciclovir in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but looked promising for safety. Donor matching could be useful in prevention CMV disease with a survival advantage demonstrated in seronegative recipients waiting up to 30 mo for a seronegative kidney. Immune-guided prophylaxis resulted in fewer CMV infection episodes in lung transplant recipients when compared with fixed-duration prophylaxis in a recent clinical trial. For treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection, maribavir was more efficacious and better tolerated when compared with investigator-initiated therapy in its registration trial for this condition. Further research regarding best treatment and prophylaxis of resistant or refractory CMV infection is needed to reflect best clinical practice choices. Optimal use of immune globulin or CMV-specific T cells for prevention or treatment of CMV disease remains undefined. Standardized definitions for the design of CMV clinical trials have been developed. In this review, we highlight recent updates in the field from data published since 2018.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Optimized CMV Preemptive Therapy and Antiviral Prophylaxis for CMV Disease Prevention in CMV High-Risk (D+R-) Kidney Transplant Recipients

The optimal strategy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in CMV donor/recipient kidney transplant recipients remains uncertain. Conclusions of prior meta-analyses that CMV disease rates with preemptive therapy (PET) and universal prophylaxis (UP) were comparable may have been affected by inclusion of studies lacking key determinants of efficacy of the respective strategies.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PET with weekly CMV polymerase chain reaction monitoring for ≥3 mo and UP with 6 mo of valganciclovir. PubMed and Embase databases were reviewed from January 1, 2010, to April 1, 2022. Risk of bias was assessed with 3 instruments (Cochrane RoB, Cochrane RoBINS-I, and an instrument for assessing risk in observational studies). The primary outcome was CMV disease incidence by 1-y posttransplant. Secondary outcomes by 1-y were graft loss, acute allograft rejection, and mortality. Results were synthesized using generalized linear mixed model meta-analysis. PET studies were stratified into low-threshold (LT) and high-threshold (HT) PET based on the viral load threshold for initiation of antiviral therapy.

Results

Twenty-five studies met inclusion criteria (6 PET, 19 UP). CMV disease incidence was significantly higher in HT (0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-0.39]) versus LT PET (0.06 [95% CI, 0.03-0.12]). LT PET was associated with a significantly lower CMV disease incidence (0.06 [95% CI, 0.03-0.12]) versus UP (0.21 [95% CI, 0.17-0.27]). Incidence of graft loss, acute allograft rejection, or mortality was not significantly different between LT PET and UP (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Receipt of lymphocyte-depleting antibodies was not associated with a significant difference in CMV disease incidence (odds ratio = 1.34 [95% CI, 0.80-2.25]).

Conclusions

LT PET is associated with a significantly lower incidence of CMV disease compared to UP with similar rates of other clinical outcomes. These findings provide rationale and preliminary data for a randomized superiority trial of optimized LT-PET versus UP in donor seropositive recipient seronegative kidney transplant recipients.

Current Perspectives on the Management of Herpesvirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk of human herpesvirus (HHV)-related morbidity and mortality due to the use of immunosuppressive therapy. We aim to increase awareness and understanding of HHV disease burden in SOTRs by providing an overview of current prevention and management strategies as described in the literature and guidelines. We discuss challenges in both prevention and treatment as well as future perspectives.

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection and disease after kidney transplantation: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in kidney transplantation recipient, and provide references for the prevention and control of CMV infection and disease in kidney transplantation patients.

METHODS

Chinese and international literature related to risk factors for CMV infection and disease in renal transplant recipients was searched using databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure; WanFang Data; Wiper; Chinese Biomedical Literature database; PubMed; Embase; Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the literature according to published standards. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software to extract the risk factors for CMV infection and disease in renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

A total of 59,847 subjects were included in 24 studies. The risk factors for CMV infection were ATG [OR = 2.76, 95% CI (2.10, 3.63), P < 0.00001], Donor (D) CMV-IgG(+) Receptor (R)(-): (D+/R-) [OR = 2.97, 95% CI (1.63, 5.44), P = 0.004 < 0.05], recipient age [OR = 1.96, 95% CI (1.50, 2.54), P < 0.00001], lymphocytopenia [OR = 3.26, 95% CI (1.46, 7.31), P < 0.00001], and mycophenolate [OR = 3.22, 95% CI (2.02, 5.46), P < 0.00001]. The protective factor for CMV infection was glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [OR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.97, 0.99), P < 0.00001], and the uncertain factors were the use of tacrolimus [OR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.64, 1.28), P = 0.58 > 0.05], rejection [OR = 1.32, 95% CI (0.49, 3.53), P = 0.58 > 0.05], donor age [OR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.99, 1.01), P = 0.67 > 0.5], and preemptive therapy [OR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.11, 2.36), P = 0.86 > 0.05]. The risk factors for CMV disease were D+/R- [OR = 4.78, 95% CI (3.76, 6.07), P < 0.00001], ATG [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.25, 2.67), P < 0.00001], rejection [OR = 1.42, 95% CI (1.26, 1.59), P < 0.00001], mycophenolate [OR = 1.67, 95% CI (1.38, 2.02), P < 0.00001], recipient age [OR = 1.03, 95% CI (1.02, 1.03), P < 0.00001], donor age [OR = 1.01, 95% CI (1.00, 1.01), P = 0.001 < 0.05], Donor (D) CMV-IgG(+) Receptor(R)(+): (D+/R+) [OR = 1.92, 95% CI (1.49, 2.46), P < 0.00001], the use of prednisolone [OR = 1.59, 95% CI (1.32, 1.92), P < 0.00001], and diabetes mellitus[OR = 1.18, 95% CI (1.01, 1.37), P = 0.03 < 0.05], and the uncertain factors were donor type [OR = 4.10, 95% CI (0.28, 59.79), P = 0.30 > 0.05], time of transplantation [OR = 0.95, 95% CI (0.78, 1.16), P = 0.64 > 0.05], and the use of cyclosporine [OR = 1.50, 95% CI (0.62, 3.64), P = 0.37 > 0.05].

CONCLUSION

There are many factors influencing CMV infection and disease in kidney transplant patients. Risk factors should be carefully monitored, protective factors strengthened, and more attention paid to uncertain factors.

Cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients from living donors with and without valganciclovir prophylaxis and with immunosuppression based on anti-thymocyte globulin or basiliximab

BACKGROUND

In our population, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) of 1 mg/Kg/day for 4 days is used; which permits not using valgancyclovir (VGC) prophylaxis in some renal transplant recipients (RTR) with moderate risk (R+), to reduce costs. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV), with or without prophylaxis, when exposed to low doses of ATG or basiliximab (BSL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort included 265 RTR with follow-up of 12 months. Prophylaxis was used in R-/D+ and some R+. Tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone were used in all patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of CMV in RTR with or without VGC.

RESULTS

Cytomegalovirus was documented in 46 (17.3%) patients: 20 (43.5%) with CMV infection, and 26 (56.5%) with CMV disease. Anti-thymocyte globulin was used in 39 patients (85%): 32 R+, six D+/R-, and one D-/R-. ATG was used in 90% (27 of 30) of patients with CMV and without prophylaxis. The multivariate analysis showed an association of risk for CMV with the absence of prophylaxis (RR 2.29; 95% CI 1.08-4.86), ATG use (RR 3.7; 95% CI 1.50-9.13), TAC toxicity (RR 3.77; 95% CI 1.41-10.13), and lymphocytes at the sixth post-transplant month (RR 1.77; 95% CI 1.0-3.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Low doses of ATG favored the development of CMV and a lower survival free of CMV compared with BSL. In scenarios where resources for employing VGC are limited, BSL could be an acceptable strategy.