Iron supplementation by blood donors: demographics, patterns of use, and motivation

A rapid review of strategies to manage low iron levels in adults donating whole-blood: A focus on donor behaviour

In recognition of the impact of whole-blood donation on body iron stores, there has been an increased focus assessing the efficacy of strategies to minimise the risk of iron deficiency (ID). Whilst donor behaviour is an important determinant of success, this literature is yet to be fully synthesised to help guide blood collection agencies when implementing these strategies into routine practice. This rapid review identifies strategies for management of low iron, how they have been communicated to donors, donor compliance with advice, donor use of external health services and their effect on donor retention. Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL and Wiley online library databases were searched from 2012 to November 2023, with 29 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Five iron management strategies were identified: oral iron supplementation (IS), education, dietary advice, lengthening inter-donation interval and switching donation type. Most studies (n = 16) focused on IS, with only four reporting how they communicated this to donors. Donor use of IS was high in controlled research environments but has not been evaluated when implemented into routine practice. None of the four studies on dietary advice included findings on donor acceptability. The proportion of donors consulting their doctor about a low iron result or their risk of ID was found to be suboptimal. However, in general, the identified strategies and communications had a positive effect on donor retention. More evidence is needed on how to increase donor knowledge and awareness of donation-related risk of ID as well as to identify how to effectively communicate strategies to donors to ensure optimal acceptability and use.

Validity of donor-reported iron supplementation practices obtained at the time of donation

BACKGROUND

Iron supplementation (IS) improves blood donors' iron stores and allows more frequent blood donation. Understanding the accuracy of self-reported IS is helpful for potential application of IS practices to donor eligibility or donation intervals.

METHODS

Successful whole blood and red cell apheresis donors completed a survey at donation on the use of select dietary supplements. Respondents reporting use of either iron pills (IP) or multivitamins (MV) were invited by email to complete a similar follow-up survey 6-8 weeks later and to provide the quantitative iron content of IS by referring the donor to the pill bottle label. Consistency between baseline and follow-up responses was assessed overall and by pill type and demographic variables.

RESULTS

Of 2444 donors answering the baseline survey, 40% (978) reported MV or IP at donation, 354 of whom completed the follow-up survey. A majority of survey respondents (56%-61%) reported taking iron across the two surveys, and 21%-24% took MV but were uncertain if their pills contained iron. Of 215 reporting IS at baseline, overall concordance at follow-up was 68% and was higher for donors who were female, ≥50-years old, and taking iron as an iron pill rather than in a multivitamin.

CONCLUSION

Consistency of donor responses may be insufficient for use in guiding donor eligibility. Referring donors to their pill bottles was unsuccessful in improving the high frequency of uncertain responses. Incorporating IS into donor eligibility determinations is a complex endeavor that will benefit from careful planning and from post-implementation monitoring.

Medication use in Canadian blood donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Policies regarding medication use vary between blood centres. We evaluated medication use in eligible Canadian Blood Services whole blood donors to inform possible process improvements and allow comparisons between donors and the general population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All donors are asked about medication use in the last 3 days, and medications and their reason for use are documented in our donor computer system. Donor computer records were reviewed from January 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022 to extract information on medications by donor age and sex; medications were grouped into therapeutic classes. Stability of medication use over time was determined in a random sample of 100 donors who made at least two donations in the study period.

RESULTS

One-third of successful (eligible) donors were taking medications; of these, 80% were on one or two medications. Five classes of medication accounted for 72% of medication use, and 13 classes account for 93% of use. Use remains relatively stable over time.

CONCLUSION

Medication use is common, with a few classes accounting for most use. Drop-down lists and storage of information from one donation to the next may enhance efficiency.

Iron status of blood donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines recent research on the prevalence and importance of iron deficiency in blood donors, and on efforts to mitigate it.

RECENT FINDINGS

Premenopausal females, teenagers, and high-frequency donors are at the highest risk for donation-induced iron deficiency, in both high-resource and low-resource settings. The physiology relating iron stores to hemoglobin levels and low hemoglobin deferral is well elucidated in blood donor populations, yet the clinical effects attributable to iron loss in the absence of anemia are challenging to identify. Expanded adoption of ferritin testing is improving donor management but may cause decreases in the blood supply from temporary donor loss. The potential for personalized donor management is emerging with development of computational models that predict individual interdonation intervals that aim to optimize blood collected from each donor while minimizing low hemoglobin deferrals.

SUMMARY

Measures to reduce iron deficiency are available that can be deployed on a standardized or, increasingly, personalized basis. Blood centers, regulators, and donors should continue to evaluate different tactics for addressing this problem, to obtain a balanced approach that is optimal for maintaining adequate collections while safeguarding donor health.

Iron-deficiency among blood donors: Donors' opinion on iron supplementation strategy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Each donation of a single whole blood unit causes a 200-250mg iron loss. The main clinical manifestation of iron deficiency among blood donors is anemia, and every blood collection establishment must have measures in place to minimize and prevent iron depletion in blood donors, according to the European guidelines. However, iron deficiency without anemia is also associated with clinical manifestations. The management of iron deficiency is an acute issue; still, no consensus on its managements exists. One possibility is iron supplementation; however, the acceptability of such a measure is still unknown, so we asked donors' opinions on this topic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 2-month period, a questionnaire was voluntarily completed by blood donors at the French Military Blood Institute. Gender, age, number of donations in the last 12 months, and preference between iron supplementation and general practitioner consultation for management of iron deficiency were recorded.

RESULTS

One thousand nine hundred and seventy-four questionnaires were returned. Donors between ages 18-50 represented 89% of respondents. Altogether, 49% declared that they would rather visit their general practitioner and 46% would rather receive iron supplementation. There were no significant differences correlated with gender or age. However, a higher number of prior donations was significantly associated with a preference for iron supplementation. Frequent female donors had an even stronger preference for iron supplementation.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that there are no strong objections to iron supplementation, which could be an acceptable option for frequent donors - the main population at risk for iron deficiency.

Prevalence, risk factors, and ferritin testing to mitigate iron depletion in male plateletpheresis donors

BACKGROUND

Most single-donor platelet (SDP) donors transition to plateletpheresis after prior red blood cell (RBC) donation. Recruitment may follow identification of a high platelet count, a marker associated with iron depletion (ID). SDP donors may have underrecognized risk for iron depletion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To assess the prevalence of ID, we performed ferritin testing on male plateletpheresis donors with hemoglobin levels less than 13.5 g/dL. Multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors for low ferritin (LF; ferritin ≤26 ng/mL) and absent iron stores (AIS; ferritin <12 ng/mL). To assess the impact of notifying donors of LF results, we compared donation behavior of "Test" subjects before and after sending an LF notification letter to that of "Control" subjects before and after increasing the minimum hemoglobin for male donors. An electronic survey to Test donors inquired about iron supplementation practices.

RESULTS

Prevalence of LF was 50% and AIS was 23%, with increase in risk associated with more frequent SDP donation, both controlling for RBC donation and in donors with no recent RBC donations. Donation frequency after intervention declined less in 1272 Test donors (19%, from 13.9 to 11.2 annualized donations) than in 878 Control donors (49%, from 12.3 to 6.3 donations). Only 20% of Test donors reported taking supplemental iron when they received the LF letter; 64% of those not taking iron initiated iron supplementation following the letter.

CONCLUSIONS

Donors were responsive to notification of LF and attendant messaging on iron supplementation. Ferritin testing potentially benefits donor health and a stable platelet supply.

Iron Depletion in Adult and Teenage Blood Donors: Prevalence, Clinical Impact, and Options for Mitigation

Iron depletion is a known risk for adult blood donors, but recent studies indicate the prevalence of iron depletion is higher in teenage blood donors. Teenage donors account for more than 10% of the blood collected in the United States and are important for maintaining component availability. Evidence of harm from iron depletion has not been demonstrated, but the area would benefit from further scientific inquiry. Options to protect against iron depletion exist, but each has limitations including cost, logistics, and potential negative impact on blood supply. Blood centers should communicate with donors and make efforts to mitigate these risks.

Iron status and risk factors for iron depletion in a racially/ethnically diverse blood donor population

BACKGROUND

The optimal approach for reducing iron depletion (ID) in blood donors may vary depending on biologic or behavioral differences across donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

More than 12,600 successful whole blood donors were enrolled from four US blood centers for ferritin testing. The study population was enriched for racial/ethnic minorities (1605 African American, 1616 Asian, 1023 Hispanic). Subjects completed questionnaires on ID risk factors. Logistic regression identified predictors of absent iron stores (AIS; ferritin <12 ng/mL) and low ferritin (LF; ferritin <26 ng/mL).

RESULTS

Across all subjects, 19% had AIS and 42% had LF, with a sharp increase in risk observed with increasing donation intensity and among women a large decrease in risk in those more than 50 years old. When other factors were controlled for, African American and Asian donors showed 20% to 25% decreased risk for AIS compared to non-Hispanic Caucasian donors, while Hispanic donors had 25% higher risk. Daily iron supplementation reduced risk for LF and AIS by 30% to 40%, respectively, while the benefit from less frequent use was lower (7%-19% protection). Regular antacid use was associated with at least 20% increment to risk. Use of oral contraceptives or estrogen in females reduced risk by 16% to 22%, while males who reported supplemental testosterone use had a 50% to 125% greater risk for LF and AIS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms high prevalence of LF and AIS in US donors and the principal risk factors of age, sex, and donation frequency. Additional demographic and behavioral risk factors of secondary importance might allow for refinement of ID mitigation strategies.