Sepsis from an apheresis platelet contaminated with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus/baumannii complex bacteria and Staphylococcus saprophyticus after pathogen reduction

Growth and Distribution of Bacteria in Contaminated Whole Blood and Derived Blood Components

Introduction

Bacterial contamination of blood products presumably occurs mainly during blood collection, starting from low initial concentrations of 10-100 colony-forming units (CFUs) per bag. As little is known about bacterial growth behavior and distribution in stored whole blood (WB) and WB-derived blood products, this study aims to provide data on this subject.

Methods

WB units were inoculated with transfusion-relevant bacterial species (Acinetobacter baumannii, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Yersinia enterocolitica; n = 12 for each species), stored for 22-24 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged for separation into plasma, red blood cells (RBCs), and buffy coats (BCs). The latter were pooled with 3 random donor BCs and one unit of PAS-E each to yield plasma-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs). Samples for bacterial colony counting were collected after WB storage and immediately after blood component production. Sterility testing in PCs (n = 12 for each species) was performed by bacterial culture after 7 days of storage.

Results

Bacterial growth in WB varied remarkably between donations and species. Streptococcus species produced the highest titers in WB, whereas Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas fluorescens did not multiply. Centrifugation resulted in preferential accumulation of bacteria in BCs, with titers of up to 3.5 × 103 CFU/mL in BCs and up to ≤0.9 × 103 CFU/mL in BC-derived PCs. Overall, 72/144 PCs (50%) tested positive for bacteria after storage. Sterility test results were species-dependent, ranging from 12 of 12 PCs tested positive for Streptococcus pyogenes to 1 of 12 PCs positive for Escherichia coli. Bacterial contamination of RBC and plasma units was much less common and was associated with higher initial bacterial counts in the parent WB units.

Conclusions

Bacterial growth in WB is species-dependent and varies greatly between donations. Preferential accumulation of bacteria in BCs during manufacturing is a critical determinant of the contamination risk of BC-derived pooled PCs.

Bacterial Contamination of Platelet Products

Transfusion of bacterially contaminated platelets, although rare, is still a major cause of mortality and morbidity despite the introduction of many methods to limit this over the past 20 years. The methods used include improved donor skin disinfection, diversion of the first part of donations, use of apheresis platelet units rather than whole-blood derived pools, primary and secondary testing by culture or rapid test, and use of pathogen reduction. Primary culture has been in use the US since 2004, using culture 24 h after collection of volumes of 4-8 mL from apheresis collections and whole-blood derived pools inoculated into aerobic culture bottles, with limited use of secondary testing by culture or rapid test to extend shelf-life from 5 to 7 days. Primary culture was introduced in the UK in 2011 using a "large-volume, delayed sampling" (LVDS) protocol requiring culture 36-48 h after collection of volumes of 16 mL from split apheresis units and whole-blood derived pools, inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles (8 mL each), with a shelf-life of 7 days. Pathogen reduction using amotosalen has been in use in Europe since 2002, and was approved for use in the US in 2014. In the US, recent FDA guidance, effective October 2021, recommended several strategies to limit bacterial contamination of platelet products, including pathogen reduction, variants of the UK LVDS method and several two-step strategies, with shelf-life ranging from 3 to 7 days. The issues associated with bacterial contamination and these strategies are discussed in this review.

Associated criteria used in investigating suspected septic transfusion reactions: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Septic transfusion reactions (STRs) occur as a result of bacterial contamination of blood or blood products, resulting in sepsis. This scoping review aimed to identify, explore and map the available literature on the STR criteria triggering the investigation of STR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, Embase) were searched to retrieve scientific literature reporting such criteria, published from 1 January 2000 to 5 May 2022. Grey literature was also searched from open web sources.

RESULTS

Of 1052 references identified, 43 (21 peer-reviewed and 22 grey literature) met the eligibility criteria for inclusion and data extraction after full article screening. Of them, most (27/43, 62.79%) were found to report a single set of criteria, and only two reported four or more sets of criteria. The analysis of 66 sets of criteria collected from the selected references revealed 57 different sets. A few sets of criteria used only one sign and symptom (s/s) (12.12%, n = 8), whereas 16 sets used 7-15 s/s (n = 16/66; 24.24%). Of the total 319 occurrences of s/s associated with the 66 sets of criteria, post-transfusion hyperthermia, body temperature increase and hypotension were the most common s/s categories. Of all the literature available, only one study tested the diagnostic accuracy of the STR criteria.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review revealed a substantial variation in criteria used to identify suspected STR. Consequently, conducting further studies to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of these criteria, which trigger STR investigations, is imperative for advancing clinical practice.

Changing Strategies for the Detection of Bacteria in Platelet Components in Ireland: From Primary and Secondary Culture (2010-2020) to Large Volume Delayed Sampling (2020-2023)

Bacterial contamination of platelet components (PC) poses the greatest microbial risk to recipients, as bacteria can multiply over the course of PC storage at room temperature. Between 2010 and 2020, the Irish Blood Transfusion Service (IBTS) screened over 170,000 buffy coat-derived pooled (BCDP) and single-donor apheresis platelets (SDAPs) with the BACT/ALERT 3D microbial detection system (Biomerieux, L'Etoile, France), using a two-step screening protocol which incorporated primary and secondary cultures. Although the protocol was successful in averting septic transfusion reactions (STRs), testing large sample volumes at later time points was reported to improve detection of bacterial contamination. A modified large-volume delayed sampling (LVDS)-type protocol was adopted in 2020, which in the case of SDAP was applied to collections rather than individual splits (2020-2023, 44,642 PC screened). Rates of bacterial contamination for BCDP were 0.125% on Day-2, 0.043% on Day-4 vs. 0.191% in the post-LVDS period. SDAP contamination rates in the pre-LVDS period were 0.065% on Day-1, 0.017% on Day-4 vs. 0.072% in the post-LVDS period. Confirmed STRs were absent, and the interdiction rate for possibly contaminated SDAP was over 70%. In the post-LVDS period, BCDPs had a higher total positivity rate than SDAPs, 0.191% (1:525) versus 0.072% (1:1385), respectively, (chi-squared 12.124, 1 df, p = 0.0005). The majority of organisms detected were skin-flora-type, low pathogenicity organisms, including coagulase-negative staphylococci and Cutibacterium acnes, with little change in the frequency of clinically significant organisms identified over time. Both protocols prevented the issue of potentially harmful components contaminated (rarely) with a range of pathogenic bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Serratia marcesens, Staphylococcus aureus, and streptococci. Culture positivity of outdates post-LVDS whereby 100% of expired platelets are retested provides a residual risk estimate of 0.06% (95% CI 0.016-0.150). However, bacterial contamination rates in expired platelets did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the pre-LVDS 0.100% (CI 0.033-0.234) and post-LVDS 0.059% (0.016-0.150) periods (chi-squared = 0.651, 1 df, p = 0.42).

Posttransfusion Sepsis Attributable to Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Collection Set Manufacturing Facility, United States

During May 2018‒December 2022, we reviewed transfusion-transmitted sepsis cases in the United States attributable to polymicrobial contaminated apheresis platelet components, including Acinetobacter calcoaceticus‒baumannii complex or Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolated from patients and components. Transfused platelet components underwent bacterial risk control strategies (primary culture, pathogen reduction or primary culture, and secondary rapid test) before transfusion. Environmental samples were collected from a platelet collection set manufacturing facility. Seven sepsis cases from 6 platelet donations from 6 different donors were identified in patients from 6 states; 3 patients died. Cultures identified Acinetobacter calcoaceticus‒baumannii complex in 6 patients and 6 transfused platelets, S. saprophyticus in 4 patients and 4 transfused platelets. Whole-genome sequencing showed environmental isolates from the manufacturer were closely related genetically to patient and platelet isolates, indicating the manufacturer was the most probable source of recurrent polymicrobial contamination. Clinicians should maintain awareness of possible transfusion-transmitted sepsis even when using bacterial risk control strategies.

Microbiological environmental contamination in the blood supply chain: An international survey by the bacterial subgroup of the ISBT Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Blood transfusion centres ensure the quality and safety of transfusable blood components. However, septic transfusion reactions involving environmental contaminants occur. An international survey issued by the ISBT Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party (ISBT-TTID-WP) Bacterial Subgroup aimed to collect information regarding microbiological environmental monitoring from transfusion services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Form survey (English and Spanish) with 35 questions was sent to ISBT-TTID-WP members. The survey had four sections: (1) respondent personal information, (2) cleaning/disinfection practices during blood component manufacturing, (3) cleaning/disinfection practices during blood component storage and (4) blood component storage bag integrity. Respondents completed the survey electronically, and data were comparatively analysed using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

There were 49 responses from 20 countries. Five of 49 sites manufacture blood components in a cleanroom, and most use personal protective equipment, although the type varied between sites. Approximately 40% of sites perform environmental monitoring during blood component production, with seven sites providing details about frequency and methods. Most (~94%) centres have procedures for cleaning/disinfection of processing and storage facilities with varying responses regarding areas, frequency and methods. Inconsistency was reported regarding the orientation of platelet component incubation (portrait vs. landscape). Over 93% of sites assess storage bag integrity and report damage to manufacturers, and 49% of centres report septic transfusion reactions potentially linked to damaged storage containers.

CONCLUSION

Data from this survey highlight the need for consensual guidelines for transfusion services regarding cleaning and disinfection practices. Environmental monitoring could be adopted to minimize the risk of blood component contamination for transfusion patient safety.

Assessment of polymicrobial interactions in bacterial isolates from transfused platelet units associated with sepsis

BACKGROUND

In 2019 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a series of 4 transfusion reactions that resulted from contamination of apheresis platelet products. Products involved in all 4 cases were contaminated with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (ACBC) and in 3 products Staphylococcus saprophyticus was found as well. CDC investigation found that bacterial isolates from the cases were genetically related and suggested a common source of contamination. The contamination of blood products with ACBC is rare and polymicrobial contamination of blood products even less common. ACBC and S. saprophyticus have been observed to adhere to one another and sediment out of suspension in vitro, a process referred to as coaggregation, and we hypothesized that there was an interaction between the strains from these cases that contributed to their co-contamination of blood products.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To test the hypothesis of bacterial interaction, we performed coaggregation experiments and observed the growth characteristics of ACBC and S. saprophyticus strains recovered from contaminated blood products involved in a subset of the CDC cases.

RESULTS

An increase in S. saprophyticus CFU concentration was observed after several days of co-culture with ACBC in LB and plasma; however, no other findings suggested coaggregation or augmentative growth interaction between the bacterial strains.

CONCLUSION

Ultimately, an interaction between ACBC and S. saprophyticus that could help explain their co-occurrence and growth in contaminated platelet units was not found; however future studies of potential interactions may be warranted.

Acquired platelet storage container leaks and contamination with environmental bacteria: A preventable cause of bacterial sepsis

Background

Apheresis platelets (AP) may be contaminated by environmental bacteria via container defects acquired during processing, transport, storage, or transfusion, as highlighted by a recent series of septic reactions related to Acinetobacter spp. and other bacterial strains.

Study design and methods

The frequency and nature of acquired container defect reports to one manufacturer were evaluated from January 2019 to July 2020. The published incidence of contamination and sepsis due to environmental bacteria with culture screened AP in the United States was reviewed for the period of 2010–2019.

Results

Review of a manufacturers' records showed 23 US reports of leaks involving 24 containers attributed to postmanufacturing damage, at a rate of 44 per million distributed storage containers. Analysis of returned containers showed evidence of scratches, impressions, and/or piercings. Literature review of US hemovigilance data revealed that environmental bacteria comprised 7% of confirmed positive primary bacterial culture screens, were responsible for 14%–16% of reported septic, and 8 of 28 (29%) fatal reactions with bacterial‐culture screened AP. Sepsis cases have been reported with culture screened, point‐of‐issue (POI) tested, or pathogen‐reduced AP.

Discussion

Environmental contamination of AP is rare but can cause sepsis. Container damage provides a pathway for contamination after culture screening, POI bacteria testing, or pathogen reduction. Blood collectors and transfusion services should have procedures to ensure proper inspection, handling, storage, and transport of AP to avoid damage and should enhance efforts to detect defects prior to release and to eliminate bacteria from all contacting surfaces to minimize the risk of contamination.

How do I implement pathogen-reduced platelets?

BACKGROUND

Several risk mitigation steps have improved the safety of platelets in regard to bacterial contamination, but this continues to be a concern today. A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance issued in December 2018 aims to further limit this risk. The guidance offers multiple pathways for compliance, and hospital blood banks will have to collaborate with blood donor centers to assess various factors before deciding which method is most appropriate for them.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our institution considered several factors before moving forward with pathogen reduction technology. This included an assessment of platelet shelf-life, bacterial testing requirements, the efficacy of low-yield platelets, and managing a mixed platelet inventory. The decision to transition to pathogen-reduced platelets was associated with complex collection and processing limitations that resulted in either an increase in platelets that were over-concentrated or products with a low platelet yield.

RESULTS

Through trials of various collection settings with unique target volumes and target platelet yields, our blood donor center was able to optimize the production. At the hospital end, this transition required a thorough review of low-yield platelet products and their clinical efficacy. Additionally, this implementation necessitated collaboration with clinical colleagues, comprehensive education, and training.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathogen-reduced platelets would be the most efficient way for our institution to be compliant. This summary may serve as a roadmap for other institutions that are considering which FDA prescribed method to use and provide support for those that have decided on pathogen reduction technology but need to optimize their collections to best utilize low-yield products.

Evaluation of an improved rapid bacterial assay with untreated and pathogen-reduced platelets: Detection of Acinetobacter strains

Background

The PGDprime® test was updated to enable Acinetobacter spp. detection to respond to morbidity and mortality events in 2018 and 2020 involving platelets contaminated with Acinetobacter‐calcoaceticus‐baumannii complex (ACBC). In one morbidity event, the first‐generation PGD test failed to detect ACBC. In two other reported events, pathogen‐reduced (PR) platelets contaminated with ACBC and other bacteria led to patient morbidity and one death.

Study Design and Methods

A polyclonal antibody to Acinetobacter was integrated in the test device and evaluated for detection of Acinetobacter spp., including the ACBC isolate recovered in one of the 2018 contamination events. Limits of Detection for various Acinetobacter strains were determined in dilution studies. Detection of Acinetobacter growing in platelets after an initial low inoculum was evaluated. Use of the updated test as a secondary test after pathogen reduction was also evaluated by testing at 12‐h intervals PR platelet units inoculated with low levels of the 3 species reported in the fatal PR platelet: ACBC, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Leclercia adecarboxylata.

Results

The test detected several Acinetobacter strains at the clinically relevant CFU/ml levels associated with septic transfusions and successfully detected Acinetobacter growing in various non‐PR platelet types after an initial low inoculum. In PR platelets, the test yielded a positive result with the 3 implicated bacteria in 48 h or less after inoculation, or 48–72 h earlier than the reported time of transfusion of contaminated PR platelets.

Conclusion

PGDprime was improved to detect Acinetobacter and has shown utility to interdict contaminated PR platelets.