Outcomes and complications following ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation performed after desensitization by semi‐selective immunoadsorption ‐ a retrospective study

The Burden of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Readmission Rates and Complications, a Twenty-Year Analysis

Background/Objectives: ABO-incompatible live-donor kidney transplantation (ABOi-LDKT) has become an established treatment for end-stage renal disease. Non-inferiority in the long-term graft function compared to ABO-compatible live-donor kidney transplantations (ABOc-LDKTs) has been shown. However, the assumed burden due to complications owing to increased immunosuppression inherent to ABOi-LDKTs has not yet been quantified. The aim of this study was to determine if ABOi-LDKT recipients suffer from additional morbidity and whether the resulting burden is justified. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 45 matched pairs of ABOi-LDKTs and ABOc-LDKTs transplanted over a twenty-year period from January 2000 to March 2020. The number and duration of postoperative readmissions, surgical complication rates according to Clavien-Dindo and its comprehensive complication index (CCI), kidney function, occurrence of new-onset diabetes, and infections as well as tumor incidence were analyzed. Results: Patient and graft survival, as well as graft function, were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in terms of complications, readmission rates, and length of readmission, as well as infection and rejection rates. The median CCIs for ABOi-LDKTs and ABOc-LDKTs at primary discharge and 3, 6, 12, and >12 months were 20.9 vs. 20.9 (p = 0.363), 31.4 vs. 33.7 (p = 0.438), 33.7 vs. 33.7 (p = 0.875), 20.9 vs. 33.1 (p = 0.25), and 27.1 vs. 31.9 (p = 0.163), respectively. Conclusions: ABOi-LDKT seems safe, with comparable outcome, complication, and readmission rates to ABOc-LDKT. In recipients with ABOi living donors, transplantation should not be delayed solely due to concerns over increased perioperative risks.

Outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplants with very high isoagglutinin titers: a single-center experience and literature review

Background

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KTx) represents a possible solution to address the shortage of kidney donors. However, these transplants present immunological challenges, particularly when isoagglutinin titers are elevated pretransplant.

Methods

Single-center retrospective study describing clinical and biological outcomes of 8 patients who underwent ABOi-KTx with initial isoagglutinin titers ≥ 1/512. All patients followed a desensitization protocol combining immunosuppression (rituximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, steroids), and specific or semi-specific apheresis sessions. Clinical and biological data were extracted from electronic medical records.

Results

There were 5 males; median age of 62 years [34-82 years]; all achieved an isoagglutinin titer of ≤1/8 before transplantation after a median of 13 (range: 9-15) apheresis sessions. Three patients (37%) experienced acute humoral rejection, which required additional plasmapheresis sessions. Two patients developed chronic active rejection, successfully treated. On the infectious side, three patients developed BK-virus reactivation. Two patients developed cytomegalovirus viremia, and two others presented with bacterial infections. Surgically, two patients developed a lymphocele, and one had a perirenal hematoma. All patients survived the transplant with stable renal function: mean serum creatinine was 138 ± 15 µmol/L after four years of follow-up.

Conclusion

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, even in patients with high isoagglutinin titers, is feasible and can achieve favorable long-term graft and patient survival outcomes. However, these procedures require substantial clinical expertise and close follow-up to monitor and manage the elevated risks of infection and rejection in this population.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Non-antigen-specific Immunoadsorption Is a Risk Factor for Severe Postoperative Infections in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant Recipients

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living kidney transplantation (KTx) is an established procedure to address the demand for kidney transplants with outcomes comparable to ABO-compatible KTx. Desensitization involves the use of immunoadsorption (IA) to eliminate preformed antibodies against the allograft. This monocentric retrospective study compares single-use antigen-selective Glycosorb® ABO columns to reusable non-antigen-specific Immunosorba® immunoglobulin adsorption columns regarding postoperative infectious complications and outcome. It includes all 138 ABOi KTx performed at Freiburg Transplant Center from 2004-2020. We compare 81 patients desensitized using antigen-specific columns (sIA) to 57 patients who received IA using non-antigen-specific columns (nsIA). We describe distribution of infections, mortality and allograft survival in both groups and use Cox proportional hazards regression to test for the association of IA type with severe infections. Desensitization with nsIA tripled the risk of severe postoperative infections (adjusted HR 3.08, 95% CI: 1.3-8.1) compared to sIA. nsIA was associated with significantly more recurring (21.4% vs. 6.2%) and severe infections (28.6% vs. 8.6%), mostly in the form of urosepsis. A significantly higher proportion of patients with sIA suffered from allograft rejection (29.6% vs. 14.0%). However, allograft survival was comparable. nsIA is associated with a two-fold risk of developing a severe postoperative infection after ABOi KTx.

Postoperative Events in Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Undergoing Prior Desensitization

BACKGROUND

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is one of the best options for patients with chronic renal failure, but approximately one-third of cases are limited by incompatibility ABO and/or HLA between recipient and donor. This study aims to analyze the surgical complications and bleeding events presented in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) and HLA-incompatible (HLAi) patients within a pre-transplant desensitization program compared with ABO-compatible (ABOc) recipients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of ABOi and HLAi recipients undergoing LKDT between 2009 and 2019, resulting in a total of 62 patients that we compared with the same number of ABOc performed consecutively before 2019. The following variables were analyzed: surgical complications, presence, size and rate of reintervention of peri-graft hematomas, and number of transfusions received in the postoperative period.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were shown in donor and recipient age, BMI, or sex; in the case of pre-surgical hematocrit, the ABOi group presented slightly lower figures. In the incompatible group (ABOi + HLAi), we found a greater number of postoperative surgical complications when analyzing the number of hematomas, size, need for surgical reintervention, and the number of blood units transfused; incompatible patients showed higher rates of hematomas, need for surgical reinterventions, and transfused units (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Desensitized patients need more transfusions, have a greater number and size of hematomas, and have higher reintervention rates. Although these are present in greater numbers, we did not observe statistically significant differences in the number of surgical complications.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Outcomes in AB0 Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Case – Control Study

Background

Patients waiting for a kidney transplant by far exceed available organs. AB0 incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (AB0i LDKT) represents an additional therapeutic strategy, but with higher risk for complications. We aimed at evaluating outcomes of AB0i LDKTs compared to compatible (AB0c) controls at our Institution.

Methods

Retrospective matched case – control study (1:2) comparing AB0i vs. AB0c LDKTs from March 2012 to September 2021. Considered outcomes: graft function, acute rejection, sepsis, CMV infection, BK virus reactivation, death-censored graft survival, patient survival.

Results

Seventeen AB0i LDKTs matched to 34 AB0c controls. We found excellent graft function, comparable in the two groups, at all considered intervals, with an eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) of 67 vs. 66 at 1 year (p = 0.41), 63 vs. 64 at 3 years (p = 0.53). AB0i recipients had a statistically significant higher incidence of acute rejection, acute antibody-mediated rejection and sepsis within 30 days (p = 0.016; p = 0.02; p = 0.001), 1 year (p = 0.012; p = 0.02; p = 0.0004) and 3 years (p = 0.004; p = 0.006; p = 0.012) after surgery. There was no difference in CMV infection, BK virus reactivation, death-censored graft survival between the two groups. Patient survival was inferior in AB0i group at 1 and 3 years (88.2 vs. 100%; log-rank p = 0.03) due to early death for opportunistic infections. AB0i LDKTs spent longer time on dialysis (p = 0.04) and 82.3 vs. 38.3% controls had blood group 0 (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

AB0i LDKT is an effective therapeutic strategy with graft function and survival comparable to AB0c LDKTs, despite higher rates of acute rejection and sepsis. It is an additional opportunity for patients with less chances of being transplanted, as blood group 0 individuals.

Current Perspectives in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant

For a long time, ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplantation has been considered contraindicated, due to the presence of isohemagglutinins, natural antibodies reacting with non-self ABO antigens. However, as the demand for kidney transplantation is constantly growing, methods to expand the donor pool have become increasingly important. Thus, in the last decades, specific desensitization strategies for ABOi transplantation have been developed. Nowadays, these regimens consist of transient removal of preformed anti-A or anti-B antibodies by using plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption and B-cell immunity modulation by CD20+ cells depletion with rituximab, in association with maintenance immunosuppression including corticosteroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. The outcome in ABOi kidney transplantation have markedly improved over the years. In fact, although randomized trials are still lacking, recent meta analysis has revealed that there is no difference in terms of graft and patient's survival between ABOi and ABO compatible kidney transplant, even in the long term. However, many concerns still exist, because ABOi kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and infectious complications, partly related to the effects of extracorporeal treatments and the strong immunosuppression. Thus, a continuous improvement in desensitization strategies, with the aim of minimize the immunosuppressive burden, on the basis of immune pathogenesis, antibodies titers and/or ABO blood group, is warranted. In this review, we discuss the main immune mechanisms involved in ABOi kidney transplantation, the pathogenesis of tolerance and the desensitization regimens, including immunoadsorption and plasmapheresis and the immunosuppressive protocol. Finally, we provide an overview on outcome and future perspectives in ABOi kidney transplant.

Infection Risk in the First Year After ABO-incompatible Kidney Transplantation: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) expands the kidney donor pool and may help to overcome organ shortage. Nonetheless, concerns about infectious complications associated with ABOi-KT have been raised.

METHODS

In a nationwide cohort (Swiss Transplant Cohort Study), we compared the risk for infectious complications among ABOi and ABO-compatible (ABOc) renal transplant recipients. Infections needed to fulfill rigorous, prespecified criteria to be classified as clinically relevant. Unadjusted and adjusted competing risk regression models were used to compare the time to the first clinically relevant infection among ABOi-KT and ABOc-KT recipients. Inverse probability weighted generalized mixed-effects Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios for infection.

RESULTS

We included 757 living-donor KT recipients (639 ABOc; 118 ABOi) and identified 717 infection episodes. The spectrum of causative pathogens and the anatomical sites affected by infections were similar between ABOi-KT and ABOc-KT recipients. There was no significant difference in time to first posttransplant infection between ABOi-KT and ABOc-KT recipients (subhazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.66; P = 0.142). At 1 y, the crude infection rate was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93-1.33) episodes per patient-year for ABOi patients and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.01) for ABOc-KT recipients. Inverse probability weighted infection rates were similar between groups (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83-1.52; P = 0.461).

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of infections during the first year posttransplant was high but not relevantly different in ABOi-KT and ABOc-KT recipients. Our results highlight that concerns regarding infectious complications should not affect the implementation of ABOi-KT programs.

Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies After Desensitization With Immunoadsorption

Due to the current organ shortage, living donor kidney transplantation is increasingly performed across HLA (human leukocyte antigen) or ABO antibody barriers. There is still uncertainty about the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes, which may limit long-term graft survival. From March 2007 to December 2016, 58 sensitized living donor kidney transplant candidates were identified and 38 patients eventually included in the study: 36 patients (95%) had pre-transplant and pre-desensitization Luminex-detected donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA), and 17/36 patients (47%) in addition had a positive crossmatch result. Two patients had no detectable DSA but a positive CDC B-cell crossmatch result. Patients were treated with pre- and post-transplant apheresis and powerful immunosuppression including the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (N = 36) in combination with thymoglobulin (N = 20) or anti-IL2 receptor antibody (N = 18). The results of the 38 successfully desensitized and transplanted patients were retrospectively compared to the results of 76 matched standard-risk recipients. Desensitized patients showed patient and graft survival rates similar to that of standard-risk recipients (P = 0.55 and P = 0.16, respectively). There was a trend toward reduced death-censored graft survival in desensitized patients (P = 0.053) which, however, disappeared when the 34 patients who were transplanted after introduction of sensitive Luminex testing were analyzed (P = 0.43). The incidence of rejection episodes without borderline changes were in desensitized patients with 21% similar to the 18% in standard-risk patients (P = 0.74). Thirty-six patients had pre-transplant HLA class I and/or II DSA that were reduced by 85 and 81%, respectively, during pre-transplant desensitization (P < 0.001 for both). On day 360 after transplantation, 20 of 36 (56%) patients had lost their DSA. The overall AMR rate was 6% in these patients, but as high as 60% in 5 (14%) patients with persistent and de novo DSA during year 1; 2 (40%) of whom lost their graft due to AMR. Eleven (31%) patients with persistent DSA but without de novo DSA had an AMR rate of 18% without graft loss while one patient lost her graft without signs of AMR. Our desensitization protocol for pre-sensitized living donor kidney transplant recipients with DSA resulted in good graft outcomes with side effects and rejection rates similar to that of standard-risk recipients. Adequate patient selection prior to transplantation and frequent immunological monitoring thereafter is critical to minimize rejection episodes and subsequent graft loss.

ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in India: A Single-Center Experience of First Hundred Cases

AIM

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation overcomes immunological barrier of blood group incompatibility. There have been very few published experiences of ABOi kidney transplantation from India. We present our single-center experience of the first hundred ABOi kidney transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of consecutive first hundred ABOi kidney transplant with at least 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

During the study period (2011-2020), a total of 121 ABOi kidney transplants were performed. Of these, first hundred patients were analyzed. Median follow-up duration was 33 (10-101) months. Mean recipient and donor age were 41.5 ± 13 and 47.68 ± 11.25 years, respectively. Mean HLA mismatch was 4 ± 1.5. Median baseline anti-blood group antibody titer was 128 (2-1024). Most common recipient blood group was O. Patient and death censored graft survival was 93% and 94%, respectively, at median follow-up of 33 months. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate was 17% with acute antibody-mediated rejection being 3%. Rate of infection was 37%, most common being urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSION

ABOi kidney transplant patients had acceptable patient and graft survival as well as BPAR rates. With current preconditioning protocol, infection rate was high.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cancer-related mortality after kidney transplantation with rituximab treatment

Purpose

There are increased therapeutic usages of rituximab in kidney transplantation (KT). However, few studies have evaluated the effect of rituximab on cancer development following KT. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of rituximab on the cancer occurrence and mortality rate according to each type of cancer.

Methods

Five thousand consecutive recipients who underwent KT at our center were divided into era1 (1990–2007) and era2-rit– (2008–2018), and era2-rit+ (2008–2018) groups. The era2-rit+ group included patients who received single-dose rituximab (200–500 mg) as a desensitization treatment 1–2 weeks before KT.

Results

The 5-year incidence rates of malignant tumors after KT were 3.1%, 4.3%, and 3.5% in the era1, era2-rit–, and era2-rit+ group, respectively. The overall incidence rate of cancer after transplantation among the 3 study groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.340). The overall cancer-related mortality rate was 17.1% (53 of 310). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had the highest mortality rate (61.5%) and relative risk of cancer-related death (hazard ratio, 8.29; 95% confidence interval, 2.40–28.69; P = 0.001). However, we found no significant association between rituximab and the incidence of any malignancy.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that single-dose rituximab for desensitization may not increase the risk of malignant disease or cancer-related mortality in KT recipients. HCC was associated with the highest risk of cancer-related mortality in an endemic area of HBV infection.

Risk Due to ABO Incompatibility and Donor-Recipient Weight Mismatch in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study

The effect of donor-recipient weight mismatch is not well established in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). A total of 2584 LDKT patients in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry were classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of ABO incompatibility and donor-recipient weight mismatch (donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) < 0.8). In a multivariable Cox analysis, the combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility (n = 124) was an independent risk factor for graft survival (HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.11-6.70) and patient survival (HR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.39-9.04), whereas neither factor alone was a significant risk factor for either outcome. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was not an independent risk factor for biopsy-proven graft rejection (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.88-1.82); however, it was an independent risk factor for pneumonia (HR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.64-5.57). The mortality rate due to infection was higher among patients with both ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility than among patients with neither factor or with either factor alone. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was an independent risk factor for graft and patient survival after LDKT, whereas neither factor alone significantly affected graft or patient survival. Thus, donor-recipient weight matching should be cautiously considered in LDKT with ABO incompatibility.

Selective ABO immunoadsorption in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with major ABO incompatibility

OBJECTIVE

ABO mismatch between donor and recipient occurs in 40% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HCT). Different strategies have been described to reduce isohemagglutinins (IHA) before HCT. We describe the effect of selective ABO immunoadsorption (ABO IA) on erythrocyte transfusion rate and the development of post-transplant pure red cell aplasia (ptPRCA).

METHODS

63 patients with major ABO incompatibility were retrospectively analyzed. Nine patients with major ABO incompatibility and high-IHA titer were treated by ABO IA before HCT. We analyzed the need for transfusion and the occurrence of ptPRCA. We compared the outcome with patients treated by other methods to reduce IHA.

RESULTS

In all nine patients treated by ABO IA, IHA decreased in a median four times. PtPRCA occurred in one patient. The median number of transfusions was 8 (range: 0-36) between d0 and d100. In 25 patients with high-IHA titer without treatment or treated by other methods to reduce IHA, the need for transfusions was comparable. No difference in the incidence of ptPRCA was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective ABO IA is a feasible, safe, and effective method to reduce IHA before HCT in major ABO incompatibility. No effect on transfusion rate or ptPRCA compared to other strategies could be observed.

Performance, clinical effectiveness, and safety of immunoadsorption in a wide range of indications

Immunoadsorption is well known to selectively remove immunoglobulins and immune complexes from plasma and is applied in a variety of autoimmune diseases and for desensitization before, or at acute rejection after organ transplantation. Performance, safety, and clinical effectiveness of immunoadsorption were the aim of this study. This prospective, noninterventional, multicentre cohort study included patients treated with immunoadsorption (Immunosorba or GLOBAFFIN adsorbers) for any indication. Clinical effectiveness was assessed after termination of the patient's individual treatment schedule. Eighty‐one patients were included, 69 were treated with Immunosorba, 11 with GLOBAFFIN, one patient with both adsorbers. A majority of patients was treated for neurological indications, dilated cardiomyopathy, and before or after kidney or heart transplantation. Mean IgG reduction from pre‐ to post‐treatment was 69.9% ± 11.5% for Immunosorba and 74.1% ± 5.0% for GLOBAFFIN, respectively. The overall IgG reduction over a complete treatment block was 68%–93% with Immunosorba and 62%–90% with GLOBAFFIN depending on the duration of the overall treatment. After termination of the immunoadsorption therapy, an improvement of clinical status was observed in 63.0%, stabilization of symptoms in 29.6%, and a deterioration in 4.9% of patients. Changes in fibrinogen, thrombocytes, and albumin were mostly classified as noncritical. Overall, the treatments were well tolerated. Immunoadsorption in routine clinical practice with both GLOBAFFIN and Immunosorba has been safely performed, was well tolerated by patients, and effective in lowering immunoglobulins with an improvement or maintenance of clinical status, thus represents an additional therapeutic option for therapy refractory immune disorders.

Kidney re-transplantation in a child across the barrier of persisting angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) episodes in the absence of donor-specific antibodies against human leucocyte antigens (HLA-DSA) in pediatric and adult kidney transplant recipients are associated with, and presumably caused by, antibodies against the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT₁R-Ab). While the role of AT₁R-Ab for ABMR and graft failure is increasingly recognized, there is little information available on the management of these patients for re-transplantation over the barrier of persisting AT₁R-Ab.

CASE

We report on a male patient with kidney failure in infancy due to obstructive uropathy who had lost his first kidney transplant due to AT₁R-Ab-mediated chronic ABMR. Because this antibody persisted during 4 years of hemodialysis, for the 2nd kidney transplantation (living-related transplantation from his mother), he underwent a desensitization regimen consisting of 15 plasmapheresis sessions, infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin G and thymoglobulin, as well as pharmacological blockade of the Angiotensin II (AT II) pathway by candesartan. This intense desensitization regimen transiently decreased elevated AT₁R-Ab titers, resulting in stable short-term kidney allograft function. The subsequent clinical course, however, was complicated by acute cellular rejection and chronic ABMR due to persistent AT₁R-Ab and de novo HLA-DSA, which shortened allograft survival to a period of only 4 years.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the difficulty of persistently decreasing elevated AT₁R-Ab titers by a desensitization regimen for re-transplantation and the detrimental effect of the interplay between AT₁R-Ab and HLA-DSA on kidney transplant survival.

Outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in older patients: a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ABOi LDKT) in older individuals have not been established.

METHODS

This multicentric observational study, using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry database, included 634 older patients (≥60 years) undergoing kidney transplantation. We compared clinical outcomes of ABOi LDKT (n = 80) with those of ABO-compatible LDKT (ABOc LDKT, n = 222) and deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT, n = 332) in older patients.

RESULTS

Death-censored graft survival was similar between the three groups (P = 0.141). Patient survival after ABOi LDKT was similar to that after ABOc LDKT (P = 0.489) but higher than that after DDKT (P = 0.038). In multivariable analysis, ABOi LDKT was not risk factor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-10.38, P = 0.548), while DDKT was significant risk factor (HR 3.49, 95% CI 1.01-12.23, P = 0.049) for patient survival. Although ABOi LDKT showed higher biopsy-proven acute rejection than ABOc LDKT, the difference was not significant after adjustment with covariates. However, ABOi LDKT was significant risk factor for infection (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.12-2.45, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients, ABOi LDKT was not inferior to ABOc LDKT and was superior to DDKT for patient survival. ABOi LDKT can be recommended for older patients, rather than waiting for DDKT.

ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation

ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation is nowadays a routine procedure to expand living donor pool. The past decades have seen the evolution of desensitization protocol and immunosuppression regimen. Despite increased bleeding events, infectious complications, and rejection episodes reported in some studies, favorable graft and patient survival rate are now achieved, regardless of various protocols among transplant centers. Several issues such as the usage of rituximab and standardization of blood group antibody titration remain to be settled. The deposition of C4d is no longer the histopathologic hallmark of antibody-mediated rejection, which have inspired innovative strategies of peripheral molecular screening and the improvement of histological diagnosis of AMR (antibody-mediated rejection). The better understanding of the underlying mechanism might facilitate the distinction and therapeutic schemes of AMR.