Implementation of an Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Handover Tool in Intensive Care Using the Knowledge-to-Action Framework

Initiative to improve handover notes in a tertiary psychiatric hospital

Clinical handover is an important process in hospital settings, but it is often carried out inadequately, posing potentially serious consequences for the patients. This project aimed to increase the effectiveness of handover notes when patients were transferred between a general psychiatric ward and other wards in a tertiary psychiatric hospital. Effective handover notes in this project were defined to have the following five components: brief psychiatric history, reason for the patient to be transferred, significant risk issues, reason for psychotropic medication change and active medical issues. Baseline measurement obtained from audits revealed that the completion rate of effective handover notes was only 27.27%, which could potentially compromise patient safety and staff work efficiency. To address this problem, a series of plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles was implemented to improve the handover process. The interventions included education to junior doctors, reminders to complete effective handover notes and implementation of a handover template. Following each PDSA cycle, data were gathered to assess whether an effect had been achieved and to identify ways to enhance interventions to maximise impact. After the final PDSA cycle, the percentage of effective handover notes among all transfer cases reached 90.50%. Postintervention feedback from inpatient team indicated that effective communication between different teams was ensured, and staff satisfaction and time savings were improved. This study highlights the importance of employing PDSA cycles to assess and refine interventions and the usefulness of structuring the content of key components of handover notes to obtain measurable improvements.

Using Implementation Science in Nursing Research

OBJECTIVES

Clinical research continues to build knowledge that can potentially improve clinical and health service outcomes; however, integrating evidence into routine care is challenging, resulting in a knowledge practice gap. The field of implementation science is a resource available for nurses to translate evidence into their practice. This article aims to provide nurses with an overview of implementation science, illustrate its value integrating evidence into practice, and show how it can be applied with high rigor in nursing research practice.

DATA SOURCES

A narrative synthesis of the implementation science literature was conducted. A series of case studies were purposively selected to demonstrate the application of commonly used implementation theories, models, and frameworks across health care settings relevant to nursing. These case studies demonstrate how the theoretical framework was applied and how the outcomes of the work reduced the knowledge practice gap.

CONCLUSION

Implementation science theoretical approaches have been used by nurses and multidisciplinary teams to better understand the gap between knowledge and practice for better informed implementation. These can be used to understand the processes involved, identify the determinants at play, and undertake an effective evaluation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

By using implementation science research practice, nurses can also build a strong foundation of evidence about nursing clinical practice. As an approach, implementation science is practical and can optimize the valuable nursing resource.

Use of a Recovery Messaging Application in Outpatient Total Joint Replacement

Total joint replacement (TJR) is performed in an outpatient setting for cost containment and reimbursement changes. However, outpatient readmission to the hospital within 30-90 days postoperatively can be costly. Increases in readmission to the hospital less than 30 days postoperatively increase healthcare expenditure and can leave surgical centers without reimbursement. The purpose of the integrative review was to examine 30-day readmission rates for adults post-outpatient TJR within a 12- to 14-week time frame using the recovery messaging application following discharge. A literature search was conducted, and articles were included if they were peer-reviewed academic journals written in English between 2017 and 2022. Fifteen articles were included and evaluated using the John Hopkins evidence summary table to assess the evidence level. The literature analysis identified three themes after using the smartphone application: (a) reducing hospital 30- day readmissions, (b) increasing patient engagement and early mobility, and (c) improving patient outcomes and satisfaction. The findings of this integrative review indicate that using an evidence-based intervention, such as the smartphone application for recovery messaging, can reduce less than 30-day hospital readmissions after outpatient TJR, thus reducing healthcare costs. Future studies should evaluate specific smartphone applications after other general surgical procedures.

Informing the standardising of care for prolonged stay patients in the ICU: A scoping review of quality improvement tools

OBJECTIVES

To inform design of quality improvement (QI) tools specific to patients with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, we determined characteristics (format/content), development, implementation, and outcomes of published multi-component QI tools used in ICU irrespective of length of stay.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Scoping review searching electronic databases, trial registries and grey literature (January 2000 to January 2022).

RESULTS

We screened 58,378 citations, identifying 96 studies. All tools were designed for use commencing at ICU admission except 3 tools implemented at 3, 5 or 14 days. We identified 32 studies of locally developed checklists, 28 goal setting/structured communication templates, 23 care bundles, and 9 studies of mixed format tools. Most (43 %) tools were designed for use during rounds, fewer tools were designed for use throughout the ICU day (27 %) or stay (9 %). Most studies (55 %) reported process objectives i.e., improving communication, care standardisation, or rounding efficiency. Most common clinical processes QI tools were used to standardise were sedation (62, 65 %), ventilation and weaning (55, 57 %), and analgesia management (58, 60 %). 44 studies reported the effect of the tool on patient outcomes. Of these, only two identified a negative effect - increased ICU length of stay and increased ICU days with pain and delirium.

CONCLUSION

Although we identified numerous QI tools for use in ICU settings, few were designed to specifically address actionable processes of care relevant to the unique needs of prolonged ICU stay patients. Tools that address these needs are urgently required.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The review protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8MRE.

The University of Alabama at Birmingham COVID-19 Collaborative Outcomes Research Enterprise: Developing an institutional learning health system in response to the global pandemic

Introduction

As a local response to the COVID‐19 global pandemic, the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) established the UAB COVID‐19 Collaborative Outcomes Research Enterprise (CORE), an institutional learning health system (LHS) to achieve an integrated health services outcomes and research response.

Methods

We developed a network of expertise and capabilities to rapidly develop and deploy an institutional‐level interdisciplinary LHS. Based upon a scoping review of the literature and the Knowledge to Action Framework, we adopted a LHS framework identifying contributors and components necessary to developing a system within and between the university academic and medical centers. We used social network analysis to examine the emergence of informal work patterns and diversified network capabilities based on the LHS framework.

Results

This experience report details three principal characteristics of the UAB COVID‐19 CORE LHS development: (a) identifying network contributors and components; (b) building the institutional network; and (c) diversifying network capabilities. Contributors and committees were identified from seven components of LHS: (a) collaborative and executive leadership committee, (b) research coordinating committee, (c) oversight and ethics committee, (d) thematic scientific working groups, (e) programmatic working groups, (f) informatics capabilities, and (g) patient advisory groups. Evolving from the topical interests of the initial CORE participants, scientific working groups emerged to support the learning system network. Programmatic working groups were charged with developing a comprehensive and mutually accessible COVID‐19 database.

Discussion

Our LHS framework allowed for effective integration of multiple academic and medical centers into a cohesive institutional‐level learning system. Network analysis indicated diversity of institutional disciplines, professional rank, and topical focus pertaining to COVID‐19, with each center leveraging existing institutional responsibilities to minimize gaps in network capabilities.

Conclusion

Incorporating an adapted LHS framework designed for academic medical centers served as a foundational resource supporting further institutional‐level efforts to develop agile and responsive learning networks.

Handover From the Emergency Department to Inpatient Units: A Quality Improvement Study

BACKGROUND

Intrahospital handovers are high risk. Standardization of content and process is recommended.

LOCAL PROBLEM

Emergency department to inpatient unit handovers were inefficient.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention was a standardized operating protocol, including checklist and procedures.

METHODS

The intervention was coproduced and prototyped. Handovers were observed for intervention adherence, and the Handover Evaluation Scale was used to measure nurses' perceived quality of handover.

RESULTS

The handover had 3 steps. Step 1 had more content, prompting by the receiver, and family participation postintervention. Step 3 was shorter in duration, had less content, and occurred at the bedside more postintervention. Receiving nurses were able to ask questions and found that information provided was timely, current, and easy to follow. Sending nurses perceived that handover was less succinct postimplementation, despite decreases in handover duration and repetition of information.

CONCLUSIONS

This project has triggered ongoing improvement initiatives, necessary to keep accommodating the needs of nurses that work across boundaries.

Nursing handover in the Indonesian hospital context: Structure, process, and barriers

Background

Nursing handover is an essential part of nursing practice to safe patient care, which occurs among nurses between shifts for transferring professional responsibility and accountability. However, there is limited information about the implementation and evaluation of nursing handover in Indonesian hospitals.

Objective

This study aimed to describe the structures, processes, and barriers of the nursing handover in the Indonesian hospital context.

Methods

This study employed a case study design in five inpatient units, especially in the medical-surgical wards of a referral hospital in Indonesia. The study was conducted from August to November 2018. A total of 100 handovers and 76 nurses were included. Focus group discussions were conducted in head nurses, nurse team leaders, and registered nurses. Observations were implemented to capture the handover process, including the number of the nurses in and out and the content of the information covered situation, background, assessment, and recommendations (SBAR). Data were analyzed using content analysis and fishbone analysis.

Results

The nursing handover consisted of three phases: before, during, and after. The handover barriers were divided into manpower, material, money, method, environment, and machine. The content of handover varied according to nurses' familiarity with the patients and their complexity. The nurses also actively participated during the handover process, although some nurses were absent in the handover time. About 75% of nurses had sufficient knowledge about the shift handover process using SBAR. The SBAR was adopted as a standard for handover, but no specific guideline or standard operating procedure.

Conclusion

The results of this study can be used as basic information to develop a guideline of nursing handover and supervision in the context of hospitals in Indonesia and beyond.

A Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Adult Critical Care Settings

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this scoping review is to provide a synthesis of the available literature on implementation science in critical care settings. Specifically, we aimed to identify the evidence-based practices selected for implementation, the frequency and type of implementation strategies used to foster change, and the process and clinical outcomes associated with implementation.

DATA SOURCES

A librarian-assisted search was performed using three electronic databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles that reported outcomes aimed at disseminating, implementing, or sustaining an evidence-based intervention or practice, used established implementation strategies, and were conducted in a critical care unit were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 1,707 citations, 82 met eligibility criteria. Studies included prospective research investigations, quality improvement projects, and implementation science trials. The most common practices investigated were use of a ventilator-associated pneumonia bundle, nutritional support protocols, and the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium Monitoring/Management, and Early Exercise/Mobility bundle. A variety of implementation strategies were used to facilitate evidence adoption, most commonly educational meetings, auditing and feedback, developing tools, and use of local opinion leaders. The majority of studies (76/82, 93%) reported using more than one implementation strategy. Few studies specifically used implementation science designs and frameworks to systematically evaluate both implementation and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of critical care has experienced slow but steady gains in the number of investigations specifically guided by implementation science. However, given the exponential growth of evidence-based practices and guidelines in this same period, much work remains to critically evaluate the most effective mechanisms to integrate and sustain these practices across diverse critical care settings and teams.

Evidence-Based Practice Competency and Related Factors Among Nurses Working in Public Hospitals

This study aimed to describe the status and related factors of evidence-based practice (EBP) competency among nurses in China. A convenience sample of 1036 nurses were recruited from 13 public hospitals in Shanghai through an anonymous online survey. Nurses’ demographic data, working data, and evidence-based nursing (EBN)-related conditions were collected by a structured questionnaire and EBP competency was assessed using the Chinese version of Evidence-based Nursing Competency Rating Scale (EBNCRS). The original score of EBNCRS among nurses was not good. The original score of evidence searching, critical appraisal, and synthesis subscale was lower than the original score of evidence transfer, situation assessment, and evidence implementation subscale. Nurses’ age, hospital level, and perceived EBN knowledge were identified as significant related factors of EBP competency. There is an urgent need to upgrade the EBP competency of nurses in Shanghai, especially competency in evidence transfer, situation assessment, and evidence implementation.

Information concerning ICU patients' families in the handover-The clinicians' «game of whispers»: A qualitative study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore how information concerning ICU patients´ families is included in the ICU clinicians' daily handover.

BACKGROUND

Handover refers to the transfer of information and care responsibility between clinicians. An effective and precise handover are of great importance to ensure quality of care. Although improvements in handovers have received increasing attention in recent decades, little is known about how information about ICU patients' family members is included in handovers.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using Charmaz' constructivist grounded theory approach.

METHODS

Data were gathered through participant observation, focus groups, dyadic and individual interviews of physicians and nurses from four ICUs in different Norwegian hospitals. The data consist of 270 observation hours, seven focus groups, three dyadic interviews and two individual interviews. Field notes and transcribed interview data were analysed using constructivist grounded theory approach. COREQ checklist was applied as reporting guideline for this study.

FINDINGS

"A game of whispers" emerged as the core category, representing missing information about the patient's family during the handover. Together with three subcategories: "documentation dilemmas," "being updated" and "talking together," the core category explains how transfer of family-related information between clinicians is continually processed and resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates challenges related to appropriate and high-quality handover concerning ICU patients´ families. Oral handovers are essential in terms of clinicians' need to elaborate on written information and update each other. However, oral transmission involves a high risk of information loss during the handover. Written documentation about the family seems to be inadequate and poorly structured.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study findings suggest a need for increased awareness in practice and research of the importance of transferring appropriate and reliable information about patients' families between ICU clinicians. User-friendly handover tools and patient records that include information on patients' family members should be developed.

Using the knowledge-to-action framework with joint arthroplasty patients to improve the quality of care transition: a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty is a mature and effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis. Assisting patients in completing the transition of the perioperative period and improving their satisfaction are important aspects of quality of care. This study aimed to investigate an intervention to improve the quality of care transition for joint arthroplasty patients informed by the knowledge-to-action (KTA) framework.

METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study, a total of 160 patients who underwent joint arthroplasty at a tertiary hospital from September to November 2018 and January to March 2019 were selected as participants using convenience sampling. The control group received routine medical care, while the observation group received medical care based on the KTA framework. Transitional care quality was assessed by the Care Transition Measure (CTM), with follow-up 1 week after discharge.

RESULTS

The observation group fared significantly better than the control group on general self-care preparation and written plan dimensions, as well as the quality of care transition. There was no significant difference in doctor-patient communication or health monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The KTA framework provides a logical, valuable tool for clinical work. Using the KTA framework for joint arthroplasty patients helps to improve the quality of care transition, which is worth promoting.

A Quality Improvement Project to Increase Adherence to a Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Protocol in the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the incidence of delirium has grown to epidemic proportions in the intensive care setting with up to 80% of mechanically ventilated patients being affected. This can lead to adverse patient outcomes such as increased lengths of hospital stay, increased mortality rates, and increased long-term cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this project is to determine whether a quality improvement project can increase adherence to an existing pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) protocol for enhanced patient outcomes.

METHODS

Chart audits were conducted to determine baseline compliance, use of the PAD protocol was measured, and the type of medications administered to each mechanically ventilated patient was assessed. Using the Knowledge-to-Action framework, a multidisciplinary, multidimensional educational module was then developed and implemented that included an online tutorial, point-of-care reminders, written materials, and verbal coaching. A 3-month postimplementation chart audit was conducted to determine whether increased protocol competence was achieved.

RESULTS

Protocol use unexpectedly decreased from 74% to 41% (P < .01);however, compliance with medication recommendations did increase despite the decrease in use. Intravenous opioid use increased from 12% to 40% (P ≤ .001), whereas sedative propofol infusions decreased from 82% to 35% (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a multidimensional, multidisciplinary project was successful in increasing compliance to the clinical practice guidelines for the management of PAD in adult intensive care unit patients, despite a decrease in protocol use. This unanticipated decrease in protocol use indicates the need for additional research in this area. Future recommendations also include a review of the existing PAD protocol to determine whether revisions could be made to better suit the needs of the staff while also improving patient outcomes in the arena of delirium experienced during critical care stays.