1
|
Meier RPH, Pierson RN, Fishman JA, Buhler LH, Bottino R, Ladowski JM, Ekser B, Wolf E, Brenner P, Ierino F, Mohiuddin M, Cooper DKC, Hawthorne WJ. International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation. Transplantation 2025:00007890-990000000-01051. [PMID: 40197435 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2025]
Abstract
Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year post-transplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael P H Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of, Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard N Pierson
- Division of Cardiac Surgery and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jay A Fishman
- Transplantation Infectious Disease Program and Massachusetts General Hospital Transplant Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Leo H Buhler
- Cantonal Hospital Fribourg, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Rita Bottino
- Allegheny Health Network, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Joseph M Ladowski
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Burcin Ekser
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | | | - Paolo Brenner
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Francesco Ierino
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Muhammad Mohiuddin
- Cardiac Xenotransplantation Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - David K C Cooper
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Wayne J Hawthorne
- The Department of Surgery, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
- The Centre for Transplant & Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meier RPH, Pierson RN, Fishman JA, Buhler LH, Bottino R, Ladowski JM, Ekser B, Wolf E, Brenner P, Ierino F, Mohiuddin M, Cooper DKC, Hawthorne WJ. International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2025; 32:e70003. [PMID: 40198240 DOI: 10.1111/xen.70003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2025]
Abstract
Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year posttranplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael P H Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of, Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard N Pierson
- Division of Cardiac Surgery and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jay A Fishman
- Transplantation Infectious Disease Program and Massachusetts General Hospital Transplant Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leo H Buhler
- Cantonal Hospital Fribourg, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Rita Bottino
- Allegheny Health Network, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph M Ladowski
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Burcin Ekser
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Paolo Brenner
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Francesco Ierino
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Muhammad Mohiuddin
- Cardiac Xenotransplantation Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David K C Cooper
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wayne J Hawthorne
- The Department of Surgery, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
- The Centre for Transplant & Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vadori M, Cozzi E. Current challenges in xenotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:205-211. [PMID: 38529696 PMCID: PMC11064916 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, the xenotransplantation science has advanced tremendously, with significant strides in both preclinical and clinical research. This review intends to describe the latest cutting-edge progress in knowledge and methodologies developed to overcome potential obstacles that may preclude the translation and successful application of clinical xenotransplantation. RECENT FINDINGS Preclinical studies have demonstrated that it is now possible to extend beyond two years survival of primate recipients of life saving xenografts. This has been accomplished thanks to the utilization of genetic engineering methodologies that have allowed the generation of specifically designed gene-edited pigs, a careful donor and recipient selection, and appropriate immunosuppressive strategies.In this light, the compassionate use of genetically modified pig hearts has been authorized in two human recipients and xenotransplants have also been achieved in human decedents. Although encouraging the preliminary results suggest that several challenges have yet to be fully addressed for a successful clinical translation of xenotransplantation. These challenges include immunologic, physiologic and biosafety aspects. SUMMARY Recent progress has paved the way for the initial compassionate use of pig organs in humans and sets the scene for a wider application of clinical xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Vadori
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua
- Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Judd E, Kumar V, Porrett PM, Hyndman KA, Anderson DJ, Jones-Carr ME, Shunk A, Epstein DR, Fatima H, Katsurada A, Satou R, Navar LG, Locke JE. Physiologic homeostasis after pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation. Kidney Int 2024; 105:971-979. [PMID: 38290599 PMCID: PMC11457287 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Demand for kidney grafts outpaces supply, limiting kidney transplantation as a treatment for kidney failure. Xenotransplantation has the potential to make kidney transplantation available to many more patients with kidney failure, but the ability of xenografts to support human physiologic homeostasis has not been established. A brain-dead adult decedent underwent bilateral native nephrectomies followed by 10 gene-edited (four gene knockouts, six human transgenes) pig-to-human xenotransplantation. Physiologic parameters and laboratory values were measured for seven days in a critical care setting. Data collection aimed to assess homeostasis by measuring components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, parathyroid hormone signaling, glomerular filtration rate, and markers of salt and water balance. Mean arterial blood pressure was maintained above 60 mmHg throughout. Pig kidneys secreted renin (post-operative day three to seven mean and standard deviation: 47.3 ± 9 pg/mL). Aldosterone and angiotensin II levels were present (post-operative day three to seven, 57.0 ± 8 pg/mL and 5.4 ± 4.3 pg/mL, respectively) despite plasma renin activity under 0.6 ng/mL/hr. Parathyroid hormone levels followed ionized calcium. Urine output down trended from 37 L to 6 L per day with 4.5 L of electrolyte free water loss on post-operative day six. Aquaporin 2 channels were detected in the apical surface of principal cells, supporting pig kidney response to human vasopressin. Serum creatinine down trended to 0.9 mg/dL by day seven. Glomerular filtration rate ranged 90-240 mL/min by creatinine clearance and single-dose inulin clearance. Thus, in a human decedent model, xenotransplantation of 10 gene-edited pig kidneys provided physiologic balance for seven days. Hence, our in-human study paves the way for future clinical study of pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation in living persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Judd
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Paige M Porrett
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kelly A Hyndman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Douglas J Anderson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Maggie E Jones-Carr
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Daniel R Epstein
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Huma Fatima
- Department of Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Akemi Katsurada
- Department of Physiology and Hypertension and Renal Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisianna, USA
| | - Ryousuke Satou
- Department of Physiology and Hypertension and Renal Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisianna, USA
| | - L Gabriel Navar
- Department of Physiology and Hypertension and Renal Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisianna, USA
| | - Jayme E Locke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
| |
Collapse
|