Reinnervation following catheter-based radio-frequency renal denervation

Ultra-long-term efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in resistant hypertension: 10-year follow-up outcomes

BACKGROUND

Randomized sham-controlled trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension. Data on the very long-term effects of renal denervation are scarce.

AIMS

This study evaluates the 10-year safety and efficacy of renal denervation in resistant hypertension.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study included patients with resistant hypertension undergoing radio-frequency renal denervation between 2010 and 2012. Office blood pressure, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, color duplex sonography, and renal function were assessed after 1-, 2- and 10-years.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients completed the 10-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration 9.4 ± 0.7 years). Baseline office and 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure were 164 ± 23 mmHg and 153 ± 16 mmHg, respectively. After 10 years, 24-h ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure were reduced by 16 ± 17 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 14 ± 23 mmHg (P = 0.001), respectively. The number of antihypertensive drugs remained unchanged from 4.9 ± 1.4 to 4.5 ± 1.2 drugs (P = 0.087). The estimated glomerular filtration rate declined within the expected range from 69 (95% CI 63 to 74) to 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI 53 to 68; P < 0.001) through 10-year follow-up. Three renal artery interventions were documented for progression of pre-existing renal artery stenosis in two patients and one patient with new-onset renal artery stenosis. No other adverse events were observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Renal denervation was safe and sustainedly reduced ambulatory and office blood pressure out to 10 years in patients with resistant hypertension.

Effects of renal denervation on kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The present study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes following renal denervation (RDN) for hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prospective studies published between January 1, 2010 and November 15, 2022 where systematically identified for RDN outcomes on office and ambulatory blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine and procedural characteristics from three online databases (Medline, PubMed, EMBASE). Random effects model to combine risk ratios and mean differences was used. Where possible, clinical outcomes were pooled and analyzed at 6, 12 and 24 months. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. 11 prospective trials, with a total of 226 patients with treatment resistant HTN receiving RDN met the inclusion criteria. Age ranged from 42.5 ± 13.8 to 66 ± 9. Main findings of this review included a reduction in systolic and diastolic office blood pressure at 6 [-19.8 (p < 0.00001)/-15.2 mm Hg (p < 0.00001)] and 12 months [-21.2 (p < 0.00001)/-9.86 mm Hg (p < 0.0005)] follow-up compared to baseline. This was also seen in systolic and diastolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure at 6 [-9.77 (p = 0.05)/-3.64 mm Hg (p = 0.09)] and 12 months [-13.42 (p = 0.0007)/-6.30 mm Hg (p = 0.001)] follow-up compared to baseline. The reduction in systolic and diastolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was maintained to 24 months [(-16.30 (p = 0.0002)/-6.84 mm Hg (p = 0.0010)]. Analysis of kidney function through eGFR demonstrated non-significant results at 6 (+1.60 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.55), 12 (+5.27 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.17), and 24 months (+7.19 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.36) suggesting an interruption in natural CKD progression. Similar results were seen in analysis of serum creatinine at 6 (+0.120 mg/dL, p = 0.41), 12 (+0.100 mg/dL, p = 0.70), and 24 months (+0.07 mg/dL, p = 0.88). Assessment of procedural complications deemed RDN in a CKD cohort to be safe with an overall complication rate of 4.86%. With the current advances in RDN and its utility in multiple chronic diseases beyond hypertension, the current study summarizes critical findings that further substantiate the literature regarding the potential of such an intervention to be incorporated as an effective treatment for resistant hypertension and CKD.

Catheter-based renal artery denervation: facts and expectations

Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RAD) is entering a new era. After the disappointing results of SYMPLICITY-HTN 3 trial in year 2014, several technical and methodological advancements led to execution of important SHAM-controlled randomized trials with promising results. Now, the 2023 ESH Guidelines give RAD a class of recommendation II with a Level of Evidence B. Currently, catheter-based RAD has two main areas of application: (a) Hypertensive patients who are still untreated, in whom RAD is a sort of a first-line treatment; (b) Difficult-to-control or true resistant hypertensive patients. Notably, randomized SHAM-controlled trials met their primary end-point in both these conditions. So far, we do not dispose of established predictors of the antihypertensive response to RAD. Some data suggest that younger patients with systo-diastolic hypertension, absence of diffuse atherosclerosis and evidence of sympathetic nervous system overactivity experience a better BP response to the procedure. We reviewed the available data on catheter-based RAD and included an updated meta-analysis of the results of the available SHAM-controlled trials. Overall, the reduction in 24-h systolic blood pressure (BP) after RAD exceeded that after SHAM by 4.58 mmHg (95% CI 3.07-6.10) in untreated patients, and by 3.82 mmHg (95% CI 2.46-5.18) in treated patients, without significant heterogeneity across trials, patient phenotype (untreated versus treated patients) and technique (radiofrequency versus ultrasound). There were no important safety signals related to the procedure. Notably, some data suggest that RAD could be an effective additional approach in patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions characterized by sympathetic nervous system overactivity.

Sympathetic Modulation in Cardiac Arrhythmias: Where We Stand and Where We Go

The nuance of autonomic cardiac control has been studied for more than 400 years, yet little is understood. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding, clinical implications, and ongoing studies of cardiac sympathetic modulation and its anti-ventricular arrhythmias' therapeutic potential. Molecular-level studies and clinical studies were reviewed to elucidate the gaps in knowledge and the possible future directions for these strategies to be translated into the clinical setting. Imbalanced sympathoexcitation and parasympathetic withdrawal destabilize cardiac electrophysiology and confer the development of ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, the current strategy for rebalancing the autonomic system includes attenuating sympathoexcitation and increasing vagal tone. Multilevel targets of the cardiac neuraxis exist, and some have emerged as promising antiarrhythmic strategies. These interventions include pharmacological blockade, permanent cardiac sympathetic denervation, temporal cardiac sympathetic denervation, etc. The gold standard approach, however, has not been known. Although neuromodulatory strategies have been shown to be highly effective in several acute animal studies with very promising results, the individual and interspecies variation between human autonomic systems limits the progress in this young field. There is, however, still much room to refine the current neuromodulation therapy to meet the unmet need for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Renal denervation in management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Some, but not all, recent studies have shown that renal denervation (RDN) can improve cardiac function and exercise tolerance in people who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of RDN as a treatment for HFrEF.

METHODS

The Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched through to September 28, 2022 for clinical studies that evaluated the effect of RDN on HFrEF. The primary endpoints were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary endpoints were changes in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, left atrial diameter, and interventricular septal thickness. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also evaluated. Major adverse events were defined as death and rehospitalization for heart failure during follow-up. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine level were extracted as measures of renal function.

RESULTS

Eleven trials comprising 313 patients were eligible for quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses showed a mean increase in LVEF of 4.25 % (95 % CI 1.77-6.72; p < 0.001, I² = 69 %) and an increase in 6MWD (mean difference 50.28 m, 95 % CI 8.78-91.78; p = 0.02; I² = 81 %) after RDN. Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, left atrial diameter, and interventricular septal thickness also improved after RDN. NT-proBNP, NYHA class, and heart rate were significantly decreased after RDN. There were no significant changes in blood pressure after RDN. Mortality and HF-related hospitalization rates were relatively low. There was no significant change in eGFR or creatinine after RDN.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that RDN can effectively increase LVEF and 6MWD in patients with HFrEF but require confirmation in studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations.

The role of renal nerve stimulation in percutaneous renal denervation for hypertension: A mini-review

Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of percutaneous renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) for blood pressure (BP)-lowering in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Nevertheless, major challenges exist, such as the wide variation of BP-lowering responses following RDN (from strong response to no response) and lack of feasible and reproducible peri-procedural predictors for patient response. Both animal and human studies have demonstrated different patterns of BP responses following renal nerve stimulation (RNS), possibly related to varied regional proportions of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve tissues along the renal arteries. Animal studies of RNS have shown that rapid electrical stimulation of the renal arteries caused renal artery vasoconstriction and increased norepinephrine secretion with a concomitant increase in BP, and the responses were attenuated after RDN. Moreover, selective RDN at sites with strong RNS-induced BP increases led to a more efficient BP-lowering effect. In human, when RNS was performed before and after RDN, blunted changes in RNS-induced BP responses were noted after RDN. The systolic BP response induced by RNS before RDN and blunted systolic BP response to RNS after RDN, at the site with maximal RNS-induced systolic BP response before RDN, both correlated with the 24-h ambulatory BP reductions 3-12 months following RDN. In summary, RNS-induced BP changes, before and after RDN, could be used to assess the immediate effect of RDN and predict BP reductions months following RDN. More comprehensive, large-scale and long term trials are needed to verify these findings.

Renal denervation inhibits the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in spontaneously hypertensive rats

This study was conducted to explore the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Our experimental rats were randomly divided into the RDN group conducted by painting 10% phenol on the bilateral renal nerves (RDNX), the shamoperation group simply painting with saline (Sham), and the normotension control group (WKY) following all the animal blood and tissues of kidney, hypothalamus, and adrenal gland collected and examined 2 weeks after RDN operation. We found that the aldosterone (ALD) levels in serum and tissues all decreased in the RDNX group compared with the Sham group (p < .05). Meantime, the expression of angiotensin II type1 receptor (AT1R) mRNA also exhibited significantly reduced by 2.22-fold in the RDNX group compared to the Sham group identical to the expression of AT1R protein in the renal cortex and outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM) subjected to denervation surgery, which manifested the lower ATIR protein expression than the Sham group (p < .05). Besides, the expression of angiotensin II (Ang II) protein in the cortex , OSOM, and inner stripe of the outer medulla were all attenuated by RDN in comparison with the Sham group (p < .05). RDN reduced intrarenal RAAS and circulating RAAS to lower blood pressure and repair renal function.

The influence of inhibiting renal neural regeneration on the efficacy of renal denervation to chronic heart failure

Aims

Some studies support the occurrence of nerve regeneration in renal arteries after renal denervation (RDN). But it is unclear whether inhibiting reinnervation after RDN is beneficial to enhancing the effect of RDN on chronic heart failure (CHF).

Methods and results

Chronic heart failure Sprague Dawley rats induced by transverse aortic constriction were administered with the analogue of Nogo‐B (Nogo group) or its antagonist (NEP group) respectively after RDN. Echocardiography, messenger RNA, and protein expression of calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) in renal artery and nerves surrounding renal artery were detected. Relative protein expression of CGRP was significantly decreased in the Nog group compared with the RDN group (0.64 ± 0.51 vs. 1.68 ± 1.07, P = 0.048). The number of nerves surrounding renal artery was higher in the NEP group than in the Nog group. Left ventricular end‐systolic volume and diameter (LVVs and LVDs) were greatly decreased, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (FS) increased significantly in the RDN, Nog and NEP groups when compared with the HF group (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in left ventricular end‐diastolic volume and diameter; LVDs; LVVs; FS; LVEF; and the levels of plasma renin, noradrenaline, and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide among three groups: the RDN, Nog, and NEP groups.

Conclusions

Reinnervation of renal artery occurred in CHF rats after RDN, which had no effect on therapeutic role of RDN in CHF, and inhibiting this neural regeneration had no clinical significance and did not affect the efficacy of RDN to CHF.

Aorticorenal ganglion as a novel target for renal neuromodulation

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials for renal artery (RA) ablation have shown limited efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) can be targeted for renal denervation.

METHODS

Twenty-eight pigs were studied under isoflurane or alpha-chloralose to examine hemodynamic responses and catecholamine release in response to RA or ARG stimulation. To assess the efficacy of ARG ablation, we randomized 16 pigs to either sham, RA, or ARG ablation, followed by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Hemodynamic responses, cardiac electrophysiological parameters, and arrhythmias/sudden cardiac death were assessed following LAD occlusion. Absent hemodynamic responses to stimulation confirmed ARG or RA ablation. In vivo stellate ganglion neural activity was recorded to assess cardiac sympathetic signaling. Cadaveric dissections were performed to localize the ARG in humans for comparison to swine.

RESULTS

The ARG is a purely sympathetic ganglion with cholinergic inputs and pass-through sensory afferent fibers. Compared to RA stimulation, ARG stimulation yielded greater hemodynamic responses during alpha-chloralose anesthesia. However, neither site yielded significant responses under isoflurane. Radiofrequency ablation of the ARG eliminated responses to both RA and ARG stimulation, whereas RA ablation did not eliminate responses to ARG stimulation. Ablation of the ARG did not impact the kidneys or adrenal glands. Compared to control and RA ablation, ARG ablation was protective against ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Human and swine ARG are similarly located in the aorticorenal region.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the ARG may be a novel target for renal neuromodulation. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Device Therapy of Hypertension

In the past decade, efforts to improve blood pressure control have looked beyond conventional approaches of lifestyle modification and drug therapy to embrace interventional therapies. Based upon animal and human studies clearly demonstrating a key role for the sympathetic nervous system in the etiology of hypertension, the newer technologies that have emerged are predominantly aimed at neuromodulation of peripheral nervous system targets. These include renal denervation, baroreflex activation therapy, endovascular baroreflex amplification therapy, carotid body ablation, and pacemaker-mediated programmable hypertension control. Of these, renal denervation is the most mature, and with a recent series of proof-of-concept trials demonstrating the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency and more recently ultrasound-based renal denervation, this technology is poised to become available as a viable treatment option for hypertension in the foreseeable future. With regard to baroreflex activation therapy, endovascular baroreflex amplification, carotid body ablation, and programmable hypertension control, these are developing technologies for which more human data are required. Importantly, central nervous system control of the circulation remains a poorly understood yet vital component of the hypertension pathway and mandates further investigation. Technology to improve blood pressure control through deep brain stimulation of key cardiovascular control territories is, therefore, of interest. Furthermore, alternative nonsympathomodulatory intervention targeting the hemodynamics of the circulation may also be worth exploring for patients in whom sympathetic drive is less relevant to hypertension perpetuation. Herein, we review the aforementioned technologies with an emphasis on the preclinical data that underpin their rationale and the human evidence that supports their use.

Renal iodine123-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy relates to muscle sympathetic nervous activity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation is effective for modulating augmented sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We have demonstrated that renal iodine¹²³-metaiodobenzylguanidine (¹²³I-MIBG) scintigraphy is associated with muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in patients with hypertension. However, it is unclear whether renal ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy is useful for assessment of SNA in HFrEF.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 24 HFrEF patients and 11 healthy subjects as controls. Patients with HFrEF underwent ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy and hemodynamics using a Swan-Ganz catheter (SGC). HFrEF was defined as echocardiography with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%. MSNA was measured from the peroneal nerve for direct evaluation of SNA. Renal ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy was performed simultaneously with cardiac scintigraphy. The early and delayed kidney-to-mediastinum ratio (K/M), early and delayed heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M), and washout rate (WR) were calculated.

RESULTS

LVEFs were 35% ± 11% in patients with HFrEF and 63% ± 10% in the controls (p < 0.01). The WR of cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG showed no relation to MSNA, but was related to stroke volume (r = 0.45, p < 0.05). In contrast, the WR of renal ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy (average of both sides) showed a strong correlation with MSNA (BI, r = 0.70, p < 0.01; BF, r = 0.66, p < 0.01); however, no significant correlations were detected between renal ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy and SGC results.

CONCLUSIONS

The WR of renal ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy may reflect MSNA. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between renal ¹²³I-MIBG imaging and renal SNA.

Enhanced arrhythmogenic potential induced by renal autonomic nerve stimulation: Role of renal artery catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Renal artery catheter ablation has been reported as a possible therapeutic option for drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) associated with structural heart diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To further clarify its therapeutic background, we examined the relationship between electrical nerve stimulation (ENS)-induced blood pressure (BP) elevation and occurrence of VAs by using an acute canine model of renal artery ablation.

METHODS

Using a decapolar electrode catheter, ENS was successively applied from the distal, mid, and proximal segments of the renal artery in 8 beagles. The same ENS was repeated after accomplishment of radiofrequency ablation at the ostial site of the renal artery by using an irrigation catheter.

RESULTS

Before ablation, ENS increased BP from 140 ± 11/77 ± 11 to 167 ± 20/98 ± 16 mm Hg and heart rate from 100 ± 21 to 131±33 beats/min as well as induced VAs in 20 of the 45 ENS applications. Occurrence of VAs was associated with a greater magnitude of sympathetic nerve augmentation, and VAs were more frequently observed by ENS at the distal (67%) rather than mid/proximal segments of the renal artery (33%). Renal artery ablation was accomplished without any angiographic stenosis, and ENS-induced BP elevation, heart rate acceleration, and VAs occurrence were attenuated not only at the close segment (proximal) but also at the remote segments (mid/distal) of the renal artery.

CONCLUSION

The renal autonomic nerves are considered as one of the therapeutic targets for suppression of frequent VAs because its activation has arrhythmogenic potential and induces premature ventricular beats.

Melatonin attenuates renal sympathetic overactivity and reactive oxygen species in the brain in neurogenic hypertension

Sympathetic overactivation contributes to the pathogenesis of both experimental and human hypertension. We have previously reported that oxidative stress in sympathetic premotor neurons leads to arterial baroreflex dysfunction and increased sympathetic drive to the kidneys in an experimental model of neurogenic hypertension. In this study, we hypothesized that melatonin, a potent antioxidant, may be protective in the brainstem regions involved in the tonic and reflex control of blood pressure (BP) in renovascular hypertensive rats. Neurogenic hypertension was induced by placing a silver clip (gap of 0.2 mm) around the left renal artery, and after 5 weeks of renal clip placement, the rats were treated orally with melatonin (30 mg/kg/day) by gavage for 15 days. At the end of melatonin treatment, we evaluated baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP), renal sympathetic nerve activity (rSNA), and the baroreflex control of heart rate (HR) and rSNA. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected within the brainstem regions by dihydroethidium staining. Melatonin treatment effectively reduced baseline MAP and sympathoexcitation to the ischemic kidney in renovascular hypertensive rats. The baroreflex control of HR and rSNA were improved after melatonin treatment in the hypertensive group. Moreover, there was a preferential decrease in ROS within the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). Therefore, our study indicates that melatonin is effective in reducing renal sympathetic overactivity associated with decreased ROS in brainstem regions that regulate BP in an experimental model of neurogenic hypertension.

The morphogenesis of the renal plexus: Renal artery and sympathetic fibers

To examine the origin and development of the renal plexus and its relationship to the renal vessels in embryos and early human fetuses. Serial sections of 34 human embryos (stages 16 to 23 of Carnegie, 4 or 5-8 weeks) and 38 fetuses (9-19 weeks) were analyzed. Throughout the embryonic period, the kidney was not innervated by the renal plexus. Those nerves appeared at the beginning of the early fetal period (9 weeks) as branches given off by the immature autonomic abdominal plexus. The renal nerves started to approach to the kidney during the early fetal period at 9-10 weeks of development. They were distributed in close proximity to the renal arteries and their branches. They were observed first with the settlement of the renal veins. The renal artery is present as a branch of the abdominal aorta at stage 19 (between 6 and 7 weeks) prior to development of the renal plexus. The renal veins were not present during the embryonic period but appeared at the start of the fetal period, along with the renal nerves that emerged from segmented sympathetic para-aortic bodies (SPBs). Clin. Anat. 32:272-276, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Renal denervation for resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND

Resistant hypertension is highly prevalent among the general hypertensive population and the clinical management of this condition remains problematic. Different approaches, including a more intensified antihypertensive therapy, lifestyle modifications, or both, have largely failed to improve patients' outcomes and to reduce cardiovascular and renal risk. As renal sympathetic hyperactivity is a major driver of resistant hypertension, renal sympathetic ablation (renal denervation) has been recently proposed as a possible therapeutic alternative to treat this condition.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of renal denervation in individuals with resistant hypertension on clinical end points, including fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, hospital admissions, quality of life, blood pressure control, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiovascular and metabolic profile, and kidney function, as well as the potential adverse events related to the procedure.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases to 17 February 2016 using relevant search terms: the Cochrane Hypertension Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared renal denervation to standard therapy or sham procedure to treat resistant hypertension, without language restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study risks of bias. We summarised treatment effects on available clinical outcomes and adverse events using random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed heterogeneity in estimated treatment effects using Chi² and I² statistics. We calculated summary treatment estimates as a mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes, and a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We found 12 eligible studies (1149 participants). In four studies, renal denervation was compared to sham procedure; one study compared a proximal ablation to a complete renal artery denervation; in the remaining, renal denervation was tested against standard or intensified antihypertensive therapy.None of the included trials was designed to look at hard clinical end points as primary outcomes.When compared to control, there was low quality evidence that renal denervation did not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (4 studies, 742 participants; RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.84), ischaemic stroke (4 studies, 823 participants; RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.72), or unstable angina (2 studies, 201 participants; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.08 to 5.06), and moderate quality evidence that it had no effect on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) systolic BP (5 studies, 797 participants; MD 0.28 mmHg, 95% CI -3.74 to 4.29), diastolic BP (4 studies, 756 participants; MD 0.93 mmHg, 95% CI -4.50 to 6.36), office measured systolic BP (6 studies, 886 participants; MD -4.08 mmHg, 95% CI -15.26 to 7.11), or diastolic BP (5 studies, 845 participants; MD -1.30 mmHg, 95% CI -7.30 to 4.69). Furthermore, low quality evidence suggested that this procedure produced no effect on either serum creatinine (3 studies, 736 participants, MD 0.01 mg/dL; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.14), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), or creatinine clearance (4 studies, 837 participants; MD -2.09 mL/min, 95% CI -8.12 to 3.95). Based on low-quality evidence, renal denervation significantly increased bradycardia episodes compared to control (3 studies, 220 participants; RR 6.63, 95% CI 1.19 to 36.84), while the risk of other adverse events was comparable or not assessable.Data were sparse or absent for all cause mortality, hospitalisation, fatal cardiovascular events, quality of life, atrial fibrillation episodes, left ventricular hypertrophy, sleep apnoea severity, need for renal replacement therapy, and metabolic profile.The quality of the evidence was low for cardiovascular outcomes and adverse events and moderate for lack of effect on blood pressure and renal function.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resistant hypertension, there is low quality evidence that renal denervation does not change major cardiovascular events, and renal function. There was moderate quality evidence that it does not change blood pressure and and low quality evidence that it caused an increaseof bradycardia episodes. Future trials measuring patient-centred instead of surrogate outcomes, with longer follow-up periods, larger sample size and more standardized procedural methods are necessary to clarify the utility of this procedure in this population.

Renal denervation in the most serious form of resistant arterial hypertension

The aim of our observation was to establish whether or not renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) may help control blood pressure (BP) levels in patients with severe hypertension refractory to pharmacological therapy. Out of a group of 12 patients, candidates for RSD, with uncontrolled hypertension and a systolic BP over 190 mm Hg on repeated measurements despite optimal medication, four patients were excluded for multiple renal arteries and one for hyperaldosteronism. Seven patients had RSD using a Symplicity device (5M, 2 F) with a mean age of 64.9 years. While all were followed up for a minimum of 6 months, follow-up duration in the majority of them was substantially longer (12-20 months). At six months post-RSD, six of the seven patients showed a decrease in systolic BP by at least 15 mm Hg while receiving the same or fewer doses of antihypertensive agents. A similar response was seen in diastolic BP. The BP decrease was maintained throughout whole follow-up. In a small group of patients with severe hypertension, we demonstrated that renal sympathetic denervation is capable of reducing blood pressure even in patients with severe hypertension.

Clinical neurocardiology defining the value of neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics

The autonomic nervous system regulates all aspects of normal cardiac function, and is recognized to play a critical role in the pathophysiology of many cardiovascular diseases. As such, the value of neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics is increasingly evident. This White Paper reviews the current state of understanding of human cardiac neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, pathophysiology in specific disease conditions, autonomic testing, risk stratification, and neuromodulatory strategies to mitigate the progression of cardiovascular diseases.

Controversies Surrounding Renal Denervation: Lessons Learned From Real-World Experience in Two United Kingdom Centers

Renal denervation (RDN) is a therapy that targets treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). The Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (Symplicity) HTN-1 and Symplicity HTN-2 trials reported response rates of >80%; however, sham-controlled Symplicity HTN-3 failed to reach its primary blood pressure (BP) outcome. The authors address the current controversies surrounding RDN, illustrated with real-world data from two centers in the United Kingdom. In this cohort, 52% of patients responded to RDN, with a 13±32 mm Hg reduction in office systolic BP (SBP) at 6 months (n=29, P=.03). Baseline office SBP and number of ablations correlated with office SBP reduction (R=-0.47, P=.01; R=-0.56, P=.002). RDN appears to be an effective treatment for some patients with TRH; however, individual responses are highly variable. Selecting patients for RDN is challenging, with only 10% (33 of 321) of the screened patients eligible for the study. Medication alterations and nonadherence confound outcomes. Adequate ablation is critical and should impact future catheter design/training. Markers of procedural success and improved patient selection parameters remain key research aims.

The role of the renal afferent and efferent nerve fibers in heart failure

Renal nerves contain afferent, sensory and efferent, sympathetic nerve fibers. In heart failure (HF) there is an increase in renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), which can lead to renal vasoconstriction, increased renin release and sodium retention. These changes are thought to contribute to renal dysfunction, which is predictive of poor outcome in patients with HF. In contrast, the role of the renal afferent nerves remains largely unexplored in HF. This is somewhat surprising as there are multiple triggers in HF that have the potential to increase afferent nerve activity, including increased venous pressure and reduced kidney perfusion. Some of the few studies investigating renal afferents in HF have suggested that at least the sympatho-inhibitory reno-renal reflex is blunted. In experimentally induced HF, renal denervation, both surgical and catheter-based, has been associated with some improvements in renal and cardiac function. It remains unknown whether the effects are due to removal of the efferent renal nerve fibers or afferent renal nerve fibers, or a combination of both. Here, we review the effects of HF on renal efferent and afferent nerve function and critically assess the latest evidence supporting renal denervation as a potential treatment in HF.