1
|
Pastor V, Medina JH. α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in memory processing. Eur J Neurosci 2024; 59:2138-2154. [PMID: 36634032 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Information storage in the brain involves different memory types and stages that are processed by several brain regions. Cholinergic pathways through acetylcholine receptors actively participate on memory modulation, and their disfunction is associated with cognitive decline in several neurological disorders. During the last decade, the role of α7 subtype of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in different memory stages has been studied. However, the information about their role in memory processing is still scarce. In this review, we attempt to identify brain areas where α7 nicotinic receptors have an essential role in different memory types and stages. In addition, we discuss recent work implicating-or not-α7 nicotinic receptors as promising pharmacological targets for memory impairment associated with neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Pastor
- Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof. Eduardo De Robertis" (IBCN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Ciencias Fisiológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jorge H Medina
- Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof. Eduardo De Robertis" (IBCN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Donlon J, Kumari P, Varghese SP, Bai M, Florentin OD, Frost ED, Banks J, Vadlapatla N, Kam O, Shad MU, Rahman S, Abulseoud OA, Stone TW, Koola MM. Integrative Pharmacology in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders. J Dual Diagn 2024; 20:132-177. [PMID: 38117676 DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2023.2293854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
The detrimental physical, mental, and socioeconomic effects of substance use disorders (SUDs) have been apparent to the medical community for decades. However, it has become increasingly urgent in recent years to develop novel pharmacotherapies to treat SUDs. Currently, practitioners typically rely on monotherapy. Monotherapy has been shown to be superior to no treatment at all for most substance classes. However, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have revealed that monotherapy leads to poorer outcomes when compared with combination treatment in all specialties of medicine. The results of RCTs suggest that monotherapy frequently fails since multiple dysregulated pathways, enzymes, neurotransmitters, and receptors are involved in the pathophysiology of SUDs. As such, research is urgently needed to determine how various neurobiological mechanisms can be targeted by novel combination treatments to create increasingly specific yet exceedingly comprehensive approaches to SUD treatment. This article aims to review the neurobiology that integrates many pathophysiologic mechanisms and discuss integrative pharmacology developments that may ultimately improve clinical outcomes for patients with SUDs. Many neurobiological mechanisms are known to be involved in SUDs including dopaminergic, nicotinic, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and kynurenic acid (KYNA) mechanisms. Emerging evidence indicates that KYNA, a tryptophan metabolite, modulates all these major pathophysiologic mechanisms. Therefore, achieving KYNA homeostasis by harmonizing integrative pathophysiology and pharmacology could prove to be a better therapeutic approach for SUDs. We propose KYNA-NMDA-α7nAChRcentric pathophysiology, the "conductor of the orchestra," as a novel approach to treat many SUDs concurrently. KYNA-NMDA-α7nAChR pathophysiology may be the "command center" of neuropsychiatry. To date, extant RCTs have shown equivocal findings across comparison conditions, possibly because investigators targeted single pathophysiologic mechanisms, hit wrong targets in underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, and tested inadequate monotherapy treatment. We provide examples of potential combination treatments that simultaneously target multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms in addition to KYNA. Kynurenine pathway metabolism demonstrates the greatest potential as a target for neuropsychiatric diseases. The investigational medications with the most evidence include memantine, galantamine, and N-acetylcysteine. Future RCTs are warranted with novel combination treatments for SUDs. Multicenter RCTs with integrative pharmacology offer a promising, potentially fruitful avenue to develop novel therapeutics for the treatment of SUDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Donlon
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Pooja Kumari
- Community Living Trent Highlands, Peterborough, Canada
| | - Sajoy P Varghese
- Addiction Recovery Treatment Services, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Michael Bai
- Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ori David Florentin
- Department of Psychiatry, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Emma D Frost
- Department of Neurology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - John Banks
- Talkiatry Mental Health Clinic, New York, New York, USA
| | - Niyathi Vadlapatla
- Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| | - Olivia Kam
- Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Mujeeb U Shad
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - Shafiqur Rahman
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA
| | - Osama A Abulseoud
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Alix School of Medicine at Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Trevor W Stone
- Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maju Mathew Koola
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Theta patterns of stimulation induce synaptic and intrinsic potentiation in O-LM interneurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2205264119. [PMID: 36282913 PMCID: PMC9636972 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2205264119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain oscillations have long-lasting effects on synaptic and cellular properties. For instance, synaptic stimulation at theta (θ) frequency induces persistent depression of both excitatory synaptic transmission and intrinsic excitability in CA1 principal neurons. However, the incidence of θ activity on synaptic transmission and intrinsic excitability in hippocampal GABAergic interneurons is unclear. We report here the induction of both synaptic and intrinsic potentiation in oriens-lacunosum moleculare (O-LM) interneurons following stimulation of afferent glutamatergic inputs in the θ frequency range (∼5 Hz). Long-term synaptic potentiation (LTP) is induced by synaptic activation of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors (CP-AMPAR), whereas long-term potentiation of intrinsic excitability (LTP-IE) results from the mGluR1-dependent down-regulation of Kv7 voltage-dependent potassium channel and hyperpolarization activated and cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channel through the depletion of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate (PIP2). LTP and LTP-IE are reversible, demonstrating that both synaptic and intrinsic changes are bidirectional in O-LM cells. We conclude that synaptic activity at θ frequency induces both synaptic and intrinsic potentiation in O-LM interneurons, i.e., the opposite of what is typically seen in glutamatergic neurons.
Collapse
|
4
|
Su H, Nakauchi S, Sumikawa K. Nicotine-mediated activation of α2 nAChR-expressing OLM cells in developing mouse brains disrupts OLM cell-mediated control of LTP in adolescence. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2022; 194:107674. [PMID: 36029955 PMCID: PMC9835838 DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Early postnatal nicotine exposure, a rodent model of smoking during pregnancy, affects hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory. Here, we investigated the role of α2 nAChR-expressing OLM (α2-OLM) cells in LTP in unexposed and postnatal nicotine-exposed mice. We found that reduced α2 nAChR-dependent activation of OLM cells in α2 heterozygous knockout mice prevented LTP, whereas enhanced α2 nAChR-dependent activation of OLM cells in heterozygous knockin mice expressing hypersensitive α2 nAChRs facilitated LTP. Both optogenetic and chemogenetic activation of α2-OLM cells facilitated LTP as nicotine did. However, in postnatal nicotine-exposed mice, expressing chemogenetic hM3Dq receptors in α2-OLM cells, LTP was facilitated and both nicotinic and chemogenetic activation of α2-OLM cells prevented rather than facilitated LTP. These results demonstrate a critical role of α2-OLM cell activation in LTP as well as altered α2-OLM cell function in postnatal nicotine-exposed mice. To determine whether nicotine-mediated α2 nAChR activation in developing brains causes facilitated LTP and altered nicotinic modulation of LTP in adolescence, we used homozygous knockin mice expressing hypersensitive α2 nAChRs as a way to selectively activate α2-OLM cells. In the knockin mice, postnatal exposure to a low dose of nicotine, which had no effect on LTP in wild-type mice, is sufficient to cause facilitated LTP and altered nicotinic modulation of LTP as found in wild-type mice exposed to a higher dose of nicotine. Thus, the nicotine-mediated activation of α2 nAChRs on OLM cells in developing brains disrupts the α2-OLM cell-mediated control of LTP in adolescence that might be linked to impaired memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailing Su
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA
| | - Sakura Nakauchi
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA
| | - Katumi Sumikawa
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mercier MS, Magloire V, Cornford JH, Kullmann DM. Long-term potentiation in neurogliaform interneurons modulates excitation-inhibition balance in the temporoammonic pathway. J Physiol 2022; 600:4001-4017. [PMID: 35876215 PMCID: PMC9540908 DOI: 10.1113/jp282753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons integrate information from higher-order cortex and thalamus, and gate signalling and plasticity at proximal synapses. In the hippocampus, neurogliaform cells and other interneurons located within stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM) mediate powerful inhibition of CA1 pyramidal neuron distal dendrites. Is the recruitment of such inhibition itself subject to use-dependent plasticity, and if so, what induction rules apply? Here we show that interneurons in mouse SLM exhibit Hebbian NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP). Such plasticity can be induced by selective optogenetic stimulation of afferents in the temporoammonic pathway from the entorhinal cortex (EC), but not by equivalent stimulation of afferents from the thalamic nucleus reuniens. We further show that theta-burst patterns of afferent firing induces LTP in neurogliaform interneurons identified using neuron-derived neurotrophic factor (Ndnf)-Cre mice. Theta-burst activity of EC afferents led to an increase in disynaptic feed-forward inhibition, but not monosynaptic excitation, of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in SLM interneurons thus alters the excitation-inhibition balance at EC inputs to the apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons, implying a dynamic role for these interneurons in gating CA1 dendritic computations. KEY POINTS: Electrogenic phenomena in distal dendrites of principal neurons in the hippocampus have a major role in gating synaptic plasticity at afferent synapses on proximal dendrites. Apical dendrites also receive powerful feed-forward inhibition, mediated in large part by neurogliaform neurons. Here we show that theta-burst activity in afferents from the entorhinal cortex (EC) induces 'Hebbian' long-term potentiation (LTP) at excitatory synapses recruiting these GABAergic cells. LTP in interneurons innervating apical dendrites increases disynaptic inhibition of principal neurons, thus shifting the excitation-inhibition balance in the temporoammonic (TA) pathway in favour of inhibition, with implications for computations and learning rules in proximal dendrites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion S. Mercier
- UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental EpilepsyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Vincent Magloire
- UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental EpilepsyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jonathan H. Cornford
- UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental EpilepsyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Dimitri M. Kullmann
- UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental EpilepsyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guerreiro I, Gu Z, Yakel JL, Gutkin BS. Recurring Cholinergic Inputs Induce Local Hippocampal Plasticity through Feedforward Disinhibition. eNeuro 2022; 9:ENEURO.0389-21.2022. [PMID: 36028329 PMCID: PMC9463983 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0389-21.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The CA1 pyramidal neurons are embedded in an intricate local circuitry that contains a variety of interneurons. The roles these interneurons play in the regulation of the excitatory synaptic plasticity remains largely understudied. Recent experiments showed that recurring cholinergic activation of α7 nACh receptors expressed in oriens-lacunosum-moleculare (OLMα2) interneurons can directly induce LTP in Schaffer collateral (SC)-CA1 synapses. Here, we pair in vitro studies with biophysically based modeling to uncover the underlying mechanisms. According to our model, α7 nAChR activation increases OLM GABAergic activity. This results in the inhibition of the fast-spiking interneurons that provide feedforward inhibition onto CA1 pyramidal neurons. This disinhibition, paired with tightly timed SC stimulation, can induce potentiation at the excitatory synapses of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Our work details the role of cholinergic modulation in disinhibition-induced hippocampal plasticity. It relates the timing of cholinergic pairing found experimentally in previous studies with the timing between disinhibition and hippocampal stimulation necessary to induce potentiation and suggests the dynamics of the involved interneurons play a crucial role in determining this timing.Significance StatementWe use a combination of experiments and mechanistic modeling to uncover the key role for cholinergic neuromodulation of feedforward disinhibitory circuits in regulating hippocampal plasticity. We found that cholinergic activation of α7 nAChR on α7 nACh receptors expressed in oriens-lacunosum-moleculare interneurons, when tightly paired with stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals, can cancel feedforward inhibition onto CA1 pyramidal cells, enabling the potentiation of the SC-CA1 synapse. Our work details how cholinergic action on GABAergic interneurons can tightly regulate the excitability and plasticity of the hippocampal network, unraveling the intricate interplay of the hierarchal inhibitory circuitry and cholinergic neuromodulation as a mechanism for hippocampal plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Guerreiro
- Group for Neural Theory, LNC2 INSERM U960, Département d'études cognitives, Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Zhenglin Gu
- Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Jerrel L Yakel
- Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Boris S Gutkin
- Group for Neural Theory, LNC2 INSERM U960, Département d'études cognitives, Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France
- Center for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 101000, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Asgarihafshejani A, Honoré È, Michon FX, Laplante I, Lacaille JC. Long-term potentiation at pyramidal cell to somatostatin interneuron synapses controls hippocampal network plasticity and memory. iScience 2022; 25:104259. [PMID: 35521524 PMCID: PMC9062215 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hippocampal somatostatin (SOM) cells are dendrite-projecting inhibitory interneurons. CA1 SOM cells receive major excitatory inputs from pyramidal cells (PC-SOM synapses) which show mGluR1a- and mTORC1-mediated long-term potentiation (LTP). PC-SOM synapse LTP contributes to CA1 network metaplasticity and memory consolidation, but whether it is sufficient to regulate these processes remains unknown. Here we used optogenetic stimulation of CA1 pyramidal cells and whole-cell recordings in slices to show that optogenetic theta-burst stimulation (TBSopto) produces LTP at PC-SOM synapses. At the network level, we found that TBSopto differentially regulates metaplasticity of pyramidal cell inputs: enhancing LTP at Schaffer collateral synapses and depressing LTP at temporo-ammonic synapses. At the behavioral level, we uncovered that in vivo TBSopto regulates learning-induced LTP at PC-SOM synapses, as well as contextual fear memory. Thus, LTP of PC-SOM synapses is a long-term feedback mechanism controlling pyramidal cell synaptic plasticity, sufficient to regulate memory consolidation. Optogenetic theta-burst (TBSopto) induces LTP at PC-SOM synapses TBSopto differentially regulates metaplasticity of pyramidal cell inputs In vivo TBSopto regulates PC-SOM plasticity and contextual fear memory PC-SOM synapse LTP grants durable feedback control of network plasticity and memory
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azam Asgarihafshejani
- Department of Neurosciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Brain and Learning (CIRCA) and Research Group on Neural Signaling and Circuitry (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Ève Honoré
- Department of Neurosciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Brain and Learning (CIRCA) and Research Group on Neural Signaling and Circuitry (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - François-Xavier Michon
- Department of Neurosciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Brain and Learning (CIRCA) and Research Group on Neural Signaling and Circuitry (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Isabel Laplante
- Department of Neurosciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Brain and Learning (CIRCA) and Research Group on Neural Signaling and Circuitry (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Jean-Claude Lacaille
- Department of Neurosciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Brain and Learning (CIRCA) and Research Group on Neural Signaling and Circuitry (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
- Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kulbatskii D, Shenkarev Z, Bychkov M, Loktyushov E, Shulepko M, Koshelev S, Povarov I, Popov A, Peigneur S, Chugunov A, Kozlov S, Sharonova I, Efremov R, Skrebitsky V, Tytgat J, Kirpichnikov M, Lyukmanova E. Human Three-Finger Protein Lypd6 Is a Negative Modulator of the Cholinergic System in the Brain. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:662227. [PMID: 34631692 PMCID: PMC8494132 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.662227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Lypd6 is a GPI-tethered protein from the Ly-6/uPAR family expressed in the brain. Lypd6 enhances the Wnt/β-catenin signaling, although its action on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) have been also proposed. To investigate a cholinergic activity of Lypd6, we studied a recombinant water-soluble variant of the human protein (ws-Lypd6) containing isolated “three-finger” LU-domain. Experiments at different nAChR subtypes expressed in Xenopus oocytes revealed the negative allosteric modulatory activity of ws-Lypd6. Ws-Lypd6 inhibited ACh-evoked currents at α3β4- and α7-nAChRs with IC50 of ∼35 and 10 μM, respectively, and the maximal amplitude of inhibition of 30–50%. EC50 of ACh at α3β4-nAChRs (∼30 μM) was not changed in the presence of 35 μM ws-Lypd6, while the maximal amplitude of ACh-evoked current was reduced by ∼20%. Ws-Lypd6 did not elicit currents through nAChRs in the absence of ACh. Application of 1 μM ws-Lypd6 significantly inhibited (up to ∼28%) choline-evoked current at α7-nAChRs in rat hippocampal slices. Similar to snake neurotoxin α-bungarotoxin, ws-Lypd6 suppressed the long-term potentiation (LTP) in mouse hippocampal slices. Colocalization of endogenous GPI-tethered Lypd6 with α3β4- and α7-nAChRs was detected in primary cortical and hippocampal neurons. Ws-Lypd6 interaction with the extracellular domain of α7-nAChR was modeled using the ensemble protein-protein docking protocol. The interaction of all three Lypd6 loops (“fingers”) with the entrance to the orthosteric ligand-binding site and the loop C of the primary receptor subunit was predicted. The results obtained allow us to consider Lypd6 as the endogenous negative modulator involved in the regulation of the cholinergic system in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitrii Kulbatskii
- Bioengineering Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Zakhar Shenkarev
- Structural Biology Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia.,Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maxim Bychkov
- Bioengineering Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Eugene Loktyushov
- Bioengineering Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Mikhail Shulepko
- Bioengineering Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Koshelev
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Igor Povarov
- Brain Research Department, Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Popov
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia.,Institute of Neuroscience, Nizhny Novgorod University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Steve Peigneur
- Toxicology and Pharmacology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anton Chugunov
- Structural Biology Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia.,Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia.,International Laboratory for Supercomputer Atomistic Modelling and Multi-Scale Analysis, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Kozlov
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Irina Sharonova
- Brain Research Department, Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Roman Efremov
- Structural Biology Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia.,Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia.,International Laboratory for Supercomputer Atomistic Modelling and Multi-Scale Analysis, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Jan Tytgat
- Toxicology and Pharmacology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mikhail Kirpichnikov
- Bioengineering Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia.,Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Lyukmanova
- Bioengineering Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia.,Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia.,Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|