Increased hypoxic ventilatory sensitivity during exercise in man: are neural afferents necessary?

Carotid chemoreflex and muscle metaboreflex interact to the regulation of ventilation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Synergism among reflexes probably contributes to exercise hyperventilation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Thus, we investigated whether the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle metaboreflex interact to the regulation of ventilation ( V ˙ E ) in HFrEF. Ten patients accomplished 4-min cycling at 60% peak workload and then recovered for 2 min under either: (a) 21% O2 inhalation (tonic carotid chemoreflex activity) with legs' circulation free (inactive muscle metaboreflex); (b) 100% O2 inhalation (suppressed carotid chemoreflex activity) with legs' circulation occluded (muscle metaboreflex activation); (c) 21% O2 inhalation (tonic carotid chemoreflex activity) with legs' circulation occluded (muscle metaboreflex activation); or (d) 100% O2 inhalation (suppressed carotid chemoreflex activity) with legs' circulation free (inactive muscle metaboreflex) as control. V ˙ E , tidal volume (VT ) and respiratory frequency (fR ) were similar between each separated reflex (protocols a and b) and control (protocol d). Calculated sum of separated reflexes effects was similar to control. Oppositely, V ˙ E (mean ± SEM: Δ vs. control = 2.46 ± 1.07 L/min, p = .05) and fR (Δ = 2.47 ± 0.77 cycles/min, p = .02) increased versus control when both reflexes were simultaneously active (protocol c). Therefore, the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle metaboreflex interacted to V ˙ E regulation in a fR -dependent manner in patients with HFrEF. If this interaction operates during exercise, it can have some contribution to the HFrEF exercise hyperventilation.

Hyperadditive ventilatory response arising from interaction between the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex in healthy humans

Physical exercise potentiates the carotid chemoreflex control of ventilation (VE). Hyperadditive neural interactions may partially mediate the potentiation. However, some neural interactions remain incompletely explored. As the potentiation occurs even during low-intensity exercise, we tested the hypothesis that the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex could interact in a hyperadditive fashion. Fourteen young healthy subjects inhaled randomly, in separate visits, 12% O₂ to stimulate the carotid chemoreflex and 21% O₂ as control. A rebreathing circuit maintained isocapnia. During gases administration, subjects either remained at rest (i.e., normoxic and hypoxic rest) or the muscle mechanoreflex was stimulated via passive knee movement (i.e., normoxic and hypoxic movement). Surface muscle electrical activity did not increase during the passive movement, confirming the absence of active contractions. Hypoxic rest and normoxic movement similarly increased VE [change (mean ± SE) = 1.24 ± 0.72 vs. 0.73 ± 0.43 l/min, respectively; P = 0.46], but hypoxic rest only increased tidal volume (Vt), and normoxic movement only increased breathing frequency (BF). Hypoxic movement induced greater VE and mean inspiratory flow (Vt/Ti) increase than the sum of hypoxic rest and normoxic movement isolated responses (VE change: hypoxic movement = 3.72 ± 0.81 l/min vs. sum = 1.96 ± 0.83 l/min, P = 0.01; Vt/Ti change: hypoxic movement = 0.13 ± 0.03 l/s vs. sum = 0.06 ± 0.03 l/s, P = 0.02). Moreover, hypoxic movement increased both Vt and BF. Collectively, the results indicate that the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex interacted, mediating a hyperadditive ventilatory response in healthy humans. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The main finding of this study was that concomitant carotid chemoreflex and muscle mechanoreflex stimulation provoked greater ventilation increase than the sum of ventilation increase induced by stimulation of each reflex in isolation, which, consequently, supports that the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex interacted, mediating a hyperadditive ventilatory response in healthy humans.

Prior sustained hypoxia attenuates interaction between hypoxia and exercise as ventilatory stimuli in humans

Both exercise and hypoxia increase pulmonary ventilation. However, the combined effects of the two stimuli are more than additive, such that exercise may be considered to potentiate the acute ventilatory response to hypoxia (AHVR), and vice versa. Exposure to sustained hypoxia of 8 h duration or more has been shown to increase the acute chemoreflex responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sustained exposure to hypoxia also changed the stimulus interaction between the effects of exercise and hypoxia on ventilation. Ten subjects undertook two main protocols on two separate days. On one day, subjects were exposed to isocapnic hypoxia (IH) at an end-tidal partial pressure of O(2) of 55 mmHg and on the other day, subjects were exposed to air as a control (C). Before and after each exposure, the sensitivity of AHVR was assessed during both resting conditions and exercise at 35% of the subjects' maximal oxygen uptake capacity. Average values (means +/- s.d.) obtained for the sensitivity of AHVR from protocol IH were 0.85 +/- 0.35 (rest, prehypoxic exposure), 1.60 +/- 0.66 (exercise, prehypoxic exposure), 1.69 +/- 0.63 (rest, posthypoxic exposure) and 1.81 +/- 0.86 l min(-1) %(-1) (exercise, posthypoxic exposure). A non-dimensional variable, Phi, was used to quantify the interaction present between exercise and hypoxia. The variable Phi fell significantly following the sustained exposure to hypoxia (P < 0.02, ANOVA), indicating that the degree of stimulus interaction between acute hypoxia and exercise had declined. We suggest that the mechanisms by which sustained hypoxia modifies peripheral chemoreflex function may also modify the effects of exercise on the peripheral chemoreflex.

Potassium and breathing in exercise

The increase in ventilation caused by exercise is controlled by a combination of neural and chemical events, although the precise contribution and relative importance of these signals is still debated. It is generally agreed that the genesis of exercise hyperpnoea lies within the central nervous system and that peripheral reflexes, both chemical and neural, modulate central drive. Recently, attention has once again focused on the idea that circulating factors, in particular potassium, may play an important role in this modulation by stimulating known areas of peripheral chemoreception. Arterial chemoreceptors, muscle chemoreflex and slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors are all excited by hyperkalaemia. When potassium is raised to mimic exercise concentrations it increases ventilation in anaesthetised animals. This response is abolished by surgical denervation of the arterial chemoreceptors and is markedly reduced by chemical denervation with hyperoxia. Hypoxia enhances the ventilatory response to hyperkalaemia, and the stimulatory effects of potassium are further increased when combined with lactic acid or raised concentrations of noradrenaline. Hyperkalaemia can also increase the hypoxic sensitivity of the arterial chemoreflex in exercise. There is a close temporal relationship between potassium and ventilation during exercise, but changes in potassium are not proportionally related to changes in ventilation. When all data are taken together, there is good evidence that potassium has a supporting role in the control of exercise hyperpnoea, predominantly through modulation of the arterial chemoreflex.