Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems: Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 68

Immobilisation accuracy of double shell positioning system for stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain tumors

INTRODUCTION

Non-invasive frameless systems have paved its way for stereotactic radiotherapy treatments compared to gold standard invasive rigid frame-based systems as they are comfortable to patients, do not have risk of pain, bleeding, infection, frame slippage and have similar treatment efficacy.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To estimate immobilisation accuracy (interfraction and intrafraction) and PTV margins with double shell positioning system (DSPS) using daily image guidance for stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A prospective study was done in 19 cranial tumor patients with KPS ≥70, immobilized by the DSPS with mouth bite and treated with LINAC based image guided stereotactic radiotherapy. A PTV of 2 mm was given from the tumor. Patients were positioned by aligning the treatment room lasers to the marked isocentre on the DSPS. For all patients 3D-image registration (automatic bony anatomy) was performed by matching 1st CBCT images with the simulation reference CT (simCT) images to measure the 3D target displacement prior to the treatment delivery every day. The initial setup deviation/ interfraction motion- translational (medio-lateral-X, cranio-caudal-Y, anterior-posterior-Z) displacements in mm and rotational axis (pitch, roll, yaw) in degrees were documented. All transitional errors were corrected online. For residual Interfraction motion a 2nd CBCT was done after correction of initial setup errors and matched with simCT and treatment executed. To evaluate the intrafraction motion CBCT was done at end of every fraction and compared with 2nd CBCT images. Systematic and random errors were calculated and planning target volume (PTV) margins were estimated using van Herk formula.

RESULTS

A total of 95 CBCT image data sets were evaluated. The initial setup relocation accuracy -mean (±SD) displacements for translational X, Y and Z directions were 1.2 (0.6), 1.0 (0.9), 0.5 (0.6) mm respectively and rotations were 0.6 (± 0.5), 0.1 (± 0.4), 0.60 (± 0.6) degrees for pitch, roll and yaw respectively. Post correction, the residual interfraction mean displacements in X, Y and Z directions were 0.1 (± 0.3), 0.2 (± 0.6), 0.3 (± 0.4) mm respectively. The population systematic and random translational errors were 0.2, 0.3, 0.3 and 0.6, 0.4, 0.4 respectively. For intrafraction motion, the mean (±SD) displacements were 0.3 (± 0.2), 0.3 (± 0.5), 0.4 (± 0.2) mm in X, Y and Z directions respectively with minimal rotations in all axis. The intrafraction population systematic and random errors were <0.5 mm for all displacements. The online corrections decreased the interfraction PTV margins to 1.1, 1.1 and 1.2 mm in X, Y and Z directions respectively.

CONCLUSION

Frameless DSPS system with mouth bite using image guidance achieved a setup accuracy of a millimeter for stereotactic treatment in cranial tumors with submillimeter intrafraction motion. A decrease in PTV margins of 1.1 mm was achieved for future patients undergoing brain SRT.

Assessing the impact of distortion correction on Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: Volumetric and dosimetric analysis

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust neuroimaging technique and is the preferred method for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. However, MRI data always contain distortions caused by hardware and patient factors.

Research question

Can these distortions potentially compromise the effectiveness and safety of SRS treatments?

Material and methods

Twenty-six MR datasets with multiple metastatic brain tumors (METs) used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively evaluated. A commercially available software was used for distortion correction. Geometrical agreement between corrected and uncorrected tumor volumes was evaluated using MacDonald criteria, Euclidian distance, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). SRS plans were generated using uncorrected tumor volumes, which were assessed to determine their coverage of the corrected tumor volumes.

Results

The median target volume was 0.38 cm3 (range,0.01-12.38 cm3). A maximum displacement of METs of up to 2.87 mm and a median displacement of 0.55 mm (range,0.1-2.87 mm) were noted. The median DSC between uncorrected and corrected MRI was 0.92, and the most concerning case had a DSC of 0.46. Although all plans met the optimization criterion of at least 98% of the uncorrected tumor volume (median 99.55%, range 98.1-100%) receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose, the percent of the corrected tumor volume receiving the total prescription dose was a median of 95.45% (range,23.1-99.5%).

Discussion and conclusion

MRI distortion, though visually subtle, has significant implications for SRS planning. Regular utilization of corrected MRI is recommended for SRS planning as distortion is sometimes enough to cause a volumetric miss of SRS targets.

Artificial-intelligence-driven measurements of brain metastases' response to SRS compare favorably with current manual standards of assessment

Background

Evaluation of treatment response for brain metastases (BMs) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) becomes complex as the number of treated BMs increases. This study uses artificial intelligence (AI) to track BMs after SRS and validates its output compared with manual measurements.

Methods

Patients with BMs who received at least one course of SRS and followed up with MRI scans were retrospectively identified. A tool for automated detection, segmentation, and tracking of intracranial metastases on longitudinal imaging, MEtastasis Tracking with Repeated Observations (METRO), was applied to the dataset. The longest three-dimensional (3D) diameter identified with METRO was compared with manual measurements of maximum axial BM diameter, and their correlation was analyzed. Change in size of the measured BM identified with METRO after SRS treatment was used to classify BMs as responding, or not responding, to treatment, and its accuracy was determined relative to manual measurements.

Results

From 71 patients, 176 BMs were identified and measured with METRO and manual methods. Based on a one-to-one correlation analysis, the correlation coefficient was R2 = 0.76 (P = .0001). Using modified BM response classifications of BM change in size, the longest 3D diameter data identified with METRO had a sensitivity of 0.72 and a specificity of 0.95 in identifying lesions that responded to SRS, when using manual axial diameter measurements as the ground truth.

Conclusions

Using AI to automatically measure and track BM volumes following SRS treatment, this study showed a strong correlation between AI-driven measurements and the current clinically used method: manual axial diameter measurements.

The effects of different photon beam energies in stereotactic radiosurgery with cones

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relies on small fields to ablate lesions. Currently, linac based treatment is delivered via circular cones using a 6 MV beam. There is interest in both lower energy photon beams, which can offer steeper dose fall off as well as higher energy photon beams, which have higher dose rates, thus reducing radiation delivery times. Of interest in this study is the 2.5 MV beam developed for imaging applications and both the 6 and 10 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams, which can achieve dose rates up to 2400 cGy/min.

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the benefit and feasibility among different energy beams ranging from 2.5 to 10 MV beams by evaluating the dosimetric effects of each beam and comparing the dose to organs-at-risk (OARs) for two separate patient plans. One based on a typical real patient tremor utilizing a 4 mm cone and the other a typical brain metastasis delivered with a 10 mm cone.

METHODS

The Monte Carlo codes BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc were used to generate beams of 2.5 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 6 MV-SRS, 6 MV, 10 MV-FFF, and 10 MV from a Varian TrueBeam except 6 MV-SRS, which is taken from a Varian TX model linear accelerator. Each beam's energy spectrum, mean energy, %dd curve, and dose profile were obtained by analyzing the simulated beams. Calculated patient dose distributions were compared among six different energy beam configurations based on a realistic treatment plan for thalamotomy and a conventional brain metastasis plan. Dose to OARs were evaluated using dose-volume histograms for the same target dose coverage.

RESULTS

The mean energies of photons within the primary beam projected area were insensitive to cone sizes and the values of percentage depth-dose curves (%dd) at d = 5 cm and SSD = 95 cm for a 4 mm (10 mm) cone ranges from 62.6 (64.4) to 82.2 (85.7) for beam energy ranging from 2.5 to 10 MV beams, respectively. Doses to OARs were evaluated among these beams based on real treatment plans delivering 15 000 and 2200 cGy to the target with a 4 and 10 mm cone, respectively. The maximum doses to the brainstem, which is 10 mm away from the isocenter, was found to be 434 (300), 632 (352), 691 (362), 733 (375), 822 (403), and 975 (441) cGy for 2.5 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 6 MV-SRS, 6 MV, 10 MV-FFF, and 10 MV beams delivering 15 000 (2200) cGy target dose, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using the 6 MV-SRS as reference, changes of the maximum dose (691 cGy) to the brain stem are -37%, -9%, +6%, +19%, and 41% for 2.5 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 6 MV, 10 MV-FFF, and 10 MV beams, respectively, based on the thalamotomy plan, where the "-" or "+" signs indicate the percentage decrease or increase. Changes of the maximum dose (362 cGy) to brain stem, based on the brain metastasis plan are much less for respective beam energies. The sum of 21 arcs beam-on time was 39 min on our 6 MV-SRS beam with 1000 cGy/min for thalamotomy. The beam-on time can be reduced to 16 min with 10 MV-FFF.

Evaluation of the ability of the Brainlab Elements Cranial Distortion Correction algorithm to correct clinically relevant MRI distortions for cranial SRT

PURPOSE

Cranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) requires highly accurate lesion delineation. However, MRI can have significant inherent geometric distortions. We investigated how well the Elements Cranial Distortion Correction algorithm of Brainlab (Munich, Germany) corrects the distortions in MR image-sets of a phantom and patients.

METHODS

A non-distorted reference computed tomography image-set of a CIRS Model 603-GS (CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA) phantom was acquired. Three-dimensional T1-weighted images were acquired with five MRI scanners and reconstructed with vendor-derived distortion correction. Some were reconstructed without correction to generate heavily distorted image-sets. All MR image-sets were corrected with the Brainlab algorithm relative to the computed tomography acquisition. CIRS Distortion Check software measured the distortion in each image-set. For all uncorrected and corrected image-sets, the control points that exceeded the 0.5-mm clinically relevant distortion threshold and the distortion maximum, mean, and standard deviation were recorded. Empirical cumulative distribution functions (eCDF) were plotted. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The algorithm was evaluated with 10 brain metastases using Dice similarity coefficients (DSC).

RESULTS

The algorithm significantly reduced mean and standard deviation distortion in all image-sets. It reduced the maximum distortion in the heavily distorted image-sets from 2.072 to 1.059 mm and the control points with > 0.5-mm distortion fell from 50.2% to 4.0%. Before and especially after correction, the eCDFs of the four repeats were visually similar. ICC was 0.812 (excellent-good agreement). The algorithm increased the DSCs for all patients and image-sets.

CONCLUSION

The Brainlab algorithm significantly and reproducibly ameliorated MRI distortion, even with heavily distorted images. Thus, it increases the accuracy of cranial SRT lesion delineation. After further testing, this tool may be suitable for SRT of small lesions.

Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys

Recently, there has been increased interest worldwide in the use of conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based systems for delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) contrasting with historical delivery in specialised clinics with dedicated equipment. In order to gain an understanding and define the current status of SRS/SRT delivery in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) we conducted surveys and provided a single-day workshop. Prior to the workshop ANZ medical physicists were invited to complete two surveys: a departmental survey regarding SRS/SRT practises and equipment; and an individual survey regarding opinions on current and future SRS/SRT practices. At the workshop conclusion, attendees completed a second opinion-based survey. Workshop discussion and survey data were utilised to identify areas of consensus, and areas where a community consensus was unclear. The workshop was held on the 8th Sept 2020 virtually due to pandemic-related travel restrictions and was attended by 238 radiation oncology medical physicists from 39 departments. The departmental survey received 32 responses; a further 89 and 142 responses were received to the pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys respectively. Workshop discussion indicated a consensus that for a department to offer an SRS/SRT service, a minimum case load should be considered depending on availability of training, peer-review, resources and equipment. It was suggested this service may be limited to brain metastases only, with less common indications reserved for departments with comprehensive SRS/SRT programs. Whilst most centres showed consensus with treatment delivery techniques and image guidance, opinions varied on the minimum target diameter and treatment margin that should be applied.

Frameless immobilization system with roll correction for stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial brain metastases

The objectives of this study were to develop a frameless immobilization system that allows roll rotation corrections and to investigate the performance of this system for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment. We designed the support frame of a frameless immobilization system based on the commercial Brainlab immobilization system. The support frame consisted of a fixed component and a rotating component. With rack and pinion gears and guide holes installed in the system, the rotating component was configured to be rotated along the longitudinal axis of the patient with respect to the fixed component. To evaluate the performance of the system, the six degree-of-freedom (6D) positioning corrections (translational and rotational corrections) were assessed by image verification between planning computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. The commercial immobilization system was evaluated in the same manner for comparison. The mean translational shifts for the commercial system were 0.68 ± 0.19 mm, 0.73 ± 0.24 mm and 0.78 ± 0.19 mm, while those for the developed system were 0.44 ± 0.31 mm, 0.43 ± 0.25 mm and 0.60 ± 0.14 mm in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions, respectively. The mean rotational shifts for the commercial system were 0.37° ± 0.12°, 0.32° ± 0.16° and 0.38° ± 0.14°, while those for the developed system were 0.04° ± 0.04°, 0.11° ± 0.06° and 0.15° ± 0.12° along the lateral, vertical and longitudinal axes of the patient, respectively. For institutions that do not have 6D robotic couches installed, the use of the developed immobilization system can provide 6D corrections, resulting in shorter treatment times and higher patient positioning accuracy.

Investigating the impacts of intrafraction motion on dosimetric outcomes when treating small targets with virtual cones

Purpose

Intrafraction patient motion is a well‐documented phenomenon in radiation therapy. In stereotactic radiosurgery applications in which target sizes can be very small and dose gradients very steep, patient motion can significantly impact the magnitude and positional accuracy of the delivered dose. This work investigates the impact of intrafraction motion on dose metrics for small targets when treated with a virtual cone.

Materials and Methods

Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate dose kernels for treatment apertures ranging from 1 × 2.5 mm² to 10 × 10 mm². The phantom was an 8.2‐cm diameter sphere and isotropic voxels had lengths of 0.25 mm. Simulated treatments consisted of 3 arcs: 1 axial arc (360° gantry rotation, couch angle 0°) and 2 oblique arcs (180° gantry rotation, couch angle ±45°). Dose distributions were calculated via superposition of the rotated kernels. Two different collimator orientations were considered to create a virtual cone: (a) each treatment arc was delivered twice, once each with a static collimator angle of ±45°, and (b) each treatment arc was delivered once, with dynamic collimator rotation throughout the arc. Two different intrafraction motion patterns were considered: (a) constant linear motion and (b) sudden, persistent motion. The impact of motion on dose distributions for target sizes ranging from 1 to 10 mm diameter spheres was quantified as a function of the aperture size used to treat the lesions.

Results

The impact of motion on both the target and the surrounding tissue was a function of both aperture shape and target size. When a 0.5‐mm linear drift along each dimension occurred during treatment, targets ≥5 mm saw less than a 10% decrease in coverage by the prescription dose. Smaller apertures accrued larger penalties with respect to dosimetric hotspots seen in the tissues surrounding the target volume during intrafraction motion. For example, treating a 4‐mm‐sized target that undergoes 2.60 mm (3D vector) of continuous linear motion, the D₅ in the concentric shells that extend 1, 2, and 3 mm from the surface of the target was 39%, 24%, and 14% smaller, respectively when comparing the delivery of a larger aperture (6 × 10 mm²) to a smaller aperture (2 × 5 mm²). Using a static collimator for shaping a virtual cone during treatment minimized the dosimetric impact of motion in the majority of cases. For example, the volume that is covered by 70% or more of the prescription dose is smaller in 60.4% of cases when using the static collimator. The volume covered by 50, and 30% or more of the prescription dose is also smaller when treating with a static collimator, but the clinical significance of this finding is unknown.

Conclusions

In this work, the dosimetric trade‐offs between aperture size and target size when irradiating with virtual cones has been demonstrated. These findings provide information about the tradeoffs between target coverage and normal tissue sparing that may help inform clinical decision making when treating smaller targets with virtual cones.

8+ Year Performance of the Gamma Knife Perfexion/Icon Patient Positioning System and Possibilities for Preemptive Fault Detection Using Statistical Process Control

BACKGROUND

The large fractional doses, steep dose gradients, and small targets found in intracranial radiosurgery require extremely low beam delivery uncertainty. In the case of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), this includes minimizing patient positioning system (PPS) positioning uncertainty. Existing QA techniques are recipe based, and feature point in time pass/fail tolerances. However, modern treatment machines, including the Gamma Knife Perfexion/Icon systems, record extensive internal data in treatment logs. These data can be analyzed through statistical process control (SPC) methods which are designed to detect changes in process behavior. The purpose of this study was to characterize the long-term (8+ year) performance of a Perfexion/Icon unit and use SPC methods to determine if performance changes could be detected at levels lower than existing QA and internal manufacturer performance tolerances.

METHODS

In-house software was developed to parse Perfexion/Icon log-files and store relevant information on shot delivery in a relational database. A last-in, first-out (LIFO) queuing algorithm was created to heuristically match messages associated with a given delivered shot. Filtering criteria were developed to filter QA and uncompleted shots. The resulting matched shots were extracted. Achieved versus planned PPS position was determined for each PPS motor as well as for the vector magnitude difference in PPS position. Exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts were plotted to determine when process behavior changed over time.

RESULTS

53833 shots were delivered over an 8+ year span in the study. The mean vector magnitude PPS difference was 32.7 µm, with 97.5% of all shots within 70.1 µm. Several changes in PPS positioning behavior were observed over time, corresponding with control system faults on several occasions requiring PPS recalibration. EWMA control charts clearly demonstrate that these faults could be identified and possibly predicted as many as 3 years before there were faults beyond control system tolerance.

CONCLUSION

The PPS of Gamma Knife Perfexion/Icon systems has extremely low positioning uncertainties. EWMA control chart method can be utilized to track PPS performance over time and can potentially detect changes in performance that may indicate a component requiring maintenance. This would allow planned service visits to mitigate problems and prevent unplanned downtime.

Report of AAPM Task Group 155: Megavoltage photon beam dosimetry in small fields and non-equilibrium conditions

Small-field dosimetry used in advance treatment technologies poses challenges due to loss of lateral charged particle equilibrium (LCPE), occlusion of the primary photon source, and the limited choice of suitable radiation detectors. These challenges greatly influence dosimetric accuracy. Many high-profile radiation incidents have demonstrated a poor understanding of appropriate methodology for small-field dosimetry. These incidents are a cause for concern because the use of small fields in various specialized radiation treatment techniques continues to grow rapidly. Reference and relative dosimetry in small and composite fields are the subject of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) dosimetry code of practice that has been published as TRS-483 and an AAPM summary publication (IAEA TRS 483; Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An IAEA/AAPM International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination, Technical Report Series No. 483; Palmans et al., Med Phys 45(11):e1123, 2018). The charge of AAPM task group 155 (TG-155) is to summarize current knowledge on small-field dosimetry and to provide recommendations of best practices for relative dose determination in small megavoltage photon beams. An overview of the issue of LCPE and the changes in photon beam perturbations with decreasing field size is provided. Recommendations are included on appropriate detector systems and measurement methodologies. Existing published data on dosimetric parameters in small photon fields (e.g., percentage depth dose, tissue phantom ratio/tissue maximum ratio, off-axis ratios, and field output factors) together with the necessary perturbation corrections for various detectors are reviewed. A discussion on errors and an uncertainty analysis in measurements is provided. The design of beam models in treatment planning systems to simulate small fields necessitates special attention on the influence of the primary beam source and collimating devices in the computation of energy fluence and dose. The general requirements for fluence and dose calculation engines suitable for modeling dose in small fields are reviewed. Implementations in commercial treatment planning systems vary widely, and the aims of this report are to provide insight for the medical physicist and guidance to developers of beams models for radiotherapy treatment planning systems.

Time motion study to evaluate the impact of flattening filter free beam on overall treatment time for frameless intracranial radiosurgery using Varian TrueBeam® linear accelerator

Background

The aim was to study the impact of the flattening filter free (FFF) beam on overall treatment time for frameless intracranial radiosurgery using TrueBeam^® LINAC.The development of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is possible due to the incorporation of image guidance in the delivery of treatment. It is important to analyze the cost and benefits of FFF beams for treating SRS by understanding the impact of FFF beams in reducing the treatment time.

Materials and methods

Dynamic conformal arc (DCA ) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated using 6 MV with a flattening filter (FF) and FFF beams. Overall treatment time was divided into beam on time (BOT) and beam off time (BFT). Percentage beam on time reduction (PBOTR) and Percentage total time reduction (PTTR) factors were defined for the comparison.

Results

BOT reduction was observed to be significant for higher dose per fraction but subjected to the treatment technique and modulation differences. PBOTR values are much higher than PTTR values. The 39.9% of PBOTR resulted in only 8% PTTR for DCA and 65.3% resulted in 15.9% PTTR for VMAT.

Conclusion

Major BFT was utilized for imaging and verification. FFF beam significantly reduced the beam on time and was found to be most effective if the fractional dose was as high as that for SRS. Newly defined PBOTR and PTTR factors are very useful indicators to evaluate the efficacy of FFF beams in terms of time reduction.

Recommended procedures and responsibilities for radiosurgery (SRS) and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): report of the SEOR in collaboration with the SEFM

Today, patient management generally requires a multidisciplinary approach. However, due to the growing knowledge base and increasing complexity of Medicine, clinical practice has become even more specialised. Radiation oncology is not immune to this trend towards subspecialisation, which is particularly evident in ablative radiotherapy techniques that require high dose fractions, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of the present report is to establish the position of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM), with regard to the roles and responsibilities of healthcare professionals involved in performing SRS and SBRT. The need for this white paper is motivated due to the recent changes in Spanish Legislation (Royal Decree [RD] 601/2019, October 18, 2019) governing the use and optimization of radiotherapy and radiological protection for medical exposure to ionizing radiation (article 11, points 4 and 5) [1 ], which states: "In radiotherapy treatment units, the specialist in Radiation Oncology will be responsible for determining the correct treatment indication, selecting target volumes, determining the clinical radiation parameters for each volume, directing and supervising treatment, preparing the final clinical report, reporting treatment outcomes, and monitoring the patient's clinical course." Consequently, the SEOR and SEFM have jointly prepared the present document to establish the roles and responsibilities for the specialists-radiation oncologists (RO), medical physicists (MP), and related staff -involved in treatments with ionizing radiation. We believe that it is important to clearly establish the responsibilities of each professional group and to clearly establish the professional competencies at each stage of the radiotherapy process.

Evaluation of intrafractional head motion for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with a thermoplastic frameless mask and ceiling-floor-mounted image guidance device

PURPOSE

To evaluate intrafractional head motion (IFM) in patients who underwent intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with the ExacTrac X-ray system (ETX) and a frameless mask.

METHODS

A total of 143 patients who completed a pre-treatment examination for IFM were eligible for this study. The frameless mask type B R408 (Klarity Medical & Equipment Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China), which covers the back of the head, and the entire face, was used for patient immobilization. After the initial 6D correction and first X-ray verification (IFM₁), X-ray verification was performed every 3 min for a duration of 15 min. The IFM_p (2 ≤ p ≤ 6) was calculated as the positional difference from IFM₁. In addition, the inter-phase IFM (IP-IFM) and IFM_m were calculated. The IP-IFM was defined as |IFM_p - IFM_p-1|, and IFM_m as the difference between the values after all patients were asked to move their heads intentionally with the frameless mask on.

RESULTS

Both translational IFM_p and IP-IFM exceeded 1 mm for a single patient, whereas, for all patients, the translational IFM_m values were kept to within 1 mm in all directions. The proportions of the rotational IFM_p, IP-IFM, and IFM_m values within 0.5° were greater than 94.4%, 98.6%, and 90.2% for all of the rotational axes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A frameless mask achieved highly accurate patient positioning in combination with ETX and a 6°-of-freedom robotic couch; however, a deviation over 1 mm and 0.5° was observed with low frequency. Therefore, X-ray verification and correction are required during treatment.

Dosimetric feasibility of brain stereotactic radiosurgery with a 0.35 T MRI-guided linac and comparison vs a C-arm-mounted linac

PURPOSE

MRI is the gold-standard imaging modality for brain tumor diagnosis and delineation. The purpose of this work was to investigate the feasibility of performing brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with a 0.35 T MRI-guided linear accelerator (MRL) equipped with a double-focused multileaf collimator (MLC). Dosimetric comparisons were made vs a conventional C-arm-mounted linac with a high-definition MLC.

METHODS

The quality of MRL single-isocenter brain SRS treatment plans was evaluated as a function of target size for a series of spherical targets with diameters from 0.6 cm to 2.5 cm in an anthropomorphic head phantom and six brain metastases (max linear dimension = 0.7-1.9 cm) previously treated at our clinic on a conventional linac. Each target was prescribed 20 Gy to 99% of the target volume. Step-and-shoot IMRT plans were generated for the MRL using 11 static coplanar beams equally spaced over 360° about an isocenter placed at the center of the target. Couch and collimator angles are fixed for the MRL. Two MRL planning strategies (VR1 and VR2) were investigated. VR1 minimized the 12 Gy isodose volume while constraining the maximum point dose to be within ±1 Gy of 25 Gy which corresponded to normalization to an 80% isodose volume. VR2 minimized the 12 Gy isodose volume without the maximum dose constraint. For the conventional linac, the TB1 method followed the same strategy as VR1 while TB2 used five noncoplanar dynamic conformal arcs. Plan quality was evaluated in terms of conformity index (CI), conformity/gradient index (CGI), homogeneity index (HI), and volume of normal brain receiving ≥12 Gy (V_12Gy ). Quality assurance measurements were performed with Gafchromic EBT-XD film following an absolute dose calibration protocol.

RESULTS

For the phantom study, the CI of MRL plans was not significantly different compared to a conventional linac (P > 0.05). The use of dynamic conformal arcs and noncoplanar beams with a conventional linac spared significantly more normal brain (P = 0.027) and maximized the CGI, as expected. The mean CGI was 95.9 ± 4.5 for TB2 vs 86.6 ± 3.7 (VR1), 88.2 ± 4.8 (VR2), and 88.5 ± 5.9 (TB1). Each method satisfied a normal brain V_12Gy  ≤ 10.0 cm³ planning goal for targets with diameter ≤2.25 cm. The mean V_12Gy was 3.1 cm³ for TB2 vs 5.5 cm³ , 5.0 cm³ and 4.3 cm³ , for VR1, VR2, and TB1, respectively. For a 2.5-cm diameter target, only TB2 met the V_12Gy planning objective. The MRL clinical brain plans were deemed acceptable for patient treatment. The normal brain V_12Gy was ≤6.0 cm³ for all clinical targets (maximum target volume = 3.51 cm³ ). CI and CGI ranged from 1.12-1.65 and 81.2-88.3, respectively. Gamma analysis pass rates (3%/1mm criteria) exceeded 97.6% for six clinical targets planned and delivered on the MRL. The mean measured vs computed absolute dose difference was -0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRL system can produce clinically acceptable brain SRS plans for spherical lesions with diameter ≤2.25 cm. Large lesions (>2.25 cm) should be treated with a linac capable of delivering noncoplanar beams.

Setup error with and without image guidance using two canine intracranial positioning systems for radiation therapy

Daily image guidance reduces inter-fractional variation in patient position for intracranial radiation therapy. However, the ability to detect and correct positioning errors is limited below a certain level. Because of these limitations, the accuracy achieved with a positioning system prior to image guidance may affect the error remaining after image guidance (the residual setup error). The objective of this study was to compare the setup accuracy achieved before and after megavoltage (MV) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance between two intracranial positioning systems. Equipment included a four degrees-of-freedom couch capable of 1 mm translational moves. Six dog cadavers were positioned 24 times as for clinical treatment in a head re-positioner (HPS), and the coordinates of five fiducial markers were measured before and after image-guided correction. The values obtained for the HPS were compared with those previously reported for the standard positioning system (SPS) used at this facility. The mean three-dimensional distance vector (3DDV) was lower for the HPS than for the SPS when no image guidance was used (P = .019). The mean 3DDV after MV guidance was lower for the HPS than for the SPS (P = .027), but not different after CBCT guidance (P = .231). The 95th percentiles of the 3DDV after MV and CBCT guidance were 2.1 and 2.9 mm, respectively, for the HPS, and 2.8 and 3.6 mm for the SPS. The setup error after MV guidance was lower for the positioning system that achieved a more accurate patient position before image guidance.

Residual setup errors in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery without six degree of freedom robotic couch: Frameless versus rigid immobilization systems

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

This IRB-approved study was to compare the residual inter-fractional setup errors and intra-fractional motion of patients treated with cranial stereotactic radiosurgery without a 6 degree of freedom (DoF) couch. We evaluated both frameless non-invasive vacuum-suction immobilization (Aktina PinPoint) and TALON rigid screw immobilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients treated by Varian TrueBeam STX or Tomotherapy were selected for data collection. The dose and number of fractions received by each patient ranged from 18 Gy in 1 fraction (SRS) to 25 Gy in 5 fractions (SRT). Twelve patients were immobilized using PinPoint, a frameless suction system (Aktina Medical, New York) and eight patients were immobilized using the TALON rigid screw system. Customized head cushions were used for all patients. Six Atkina patients received pre- and post-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) to evaluate the intra-fractional motion of the Aktina system. The intra-fractional motion with the TALON rigid screw system has been reported to be negligible and was not repeated in this study. All patients received pre-treatment CBCT or megavoltage CT (MVCT) to assess inter-fractional setup accuracy. Shifts to the final treatment position were determined based on matching bony anatomy in the pre-treatment setup CT and the planning CT. Setup CT and planning CT were registered retrospectively based on bony anatomy using image registration software to quantify rotational and translational errors.

RESULTS

For the frameless Aktina system, mean and standard deviation of the intra-fractional motion were -0.5 ± 0.7 mm (lateral), 0.1 ± 0.9 mm (vertical), -0.5 ± 0.6 mm (longitudinal), -0.04 ± 0.18°(pitch), -0.1 ± 0.23°(yaw), and -0.03 ± 0.17°(roll) indicating negligible intra-fractional motion. Inter-fractional rotation errors were -0.10 ± 0.25° (pitch), -0.08 ± 0.16° (yaw), and -0.20 ± 0.41° (roll) for TALON rigid screw immobilization versus 0.20 ± 0.69° (pitch), 0.34 ± 0.56° (yaw), 0.35 ± 0.82° (roll) for frameless vacuum-suction immobilization showing that the rigid immobilization setup is more reproducible than the frameless immobilization. Without rotational correction by a 6 DoF couch, residual registration error exists and increases with distance from the image fusion center. In a 3D vector space, a tumor located 5 cm from the center of image fusion would require a 0.9 mm margin with the TALON system and a 2.1 mm margin with Aktina.

CONCLUSIONS

With image-guided radiotherapy, translational setup errors can be corrected by image registration between pre-treatment setup CT and planning CT. However, rotational errors cannot be accounted for without a 6 DoF couch. Our study showed that the frameless Aktina immobilization system provided negligible intra-fractional motion. The inter-fractional rotation setup error using Aktina was larger than rigid immobilization with the TALON system. To treat a single lesion far from the center of image registration or for multiple lesions in a single plan, additional margin may be needed to account for the uncorrectable rotational setup errors.

Impact of patient positioning uncertainty in noncoplanar intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy

The aim of this study is to evaluate the patient positioning uncertainty in noncoplanar stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for intracranial lesions with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system. In all, 28 patients treated with SRS/SRT of 70 treatment plans at our institution were evaluated in this study. Two X‐ray images with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system were first acquired to correct (XC) and verify (XV) the patient position at a couch angle of 0º. Subsequently, the XC and XV images were also acquired at each planned couch angle for using noncoplanar beams to detect position errors caused by rotating a couch. The translational XC and XV shift values at each couch angle were calculated for each plan. The percentages of the translational XC shift values within 1.0 mm for each planned couch angle for using noncoplanar beams were 77.86%, 72.26%, and 98.47% for the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. Those within 2.0 mm were 98.22%, 97.96%, and 99.75% for the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. The maximum absolute values of the translational XC shifts among all planned couch angles for using noncoplanar beams were 2.69, 2.45, and 2.17 mm for the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. The overall absolute values of the translational XV shifts were less than 1.0 mm for all directions except for one case in the longitudinal direction. The patient position errors were detected after couch rotation for using noncoplanar beams, and they exceeded a planning target volume (PTV) margin of 1.0–2.0 mm used commonly in SRS/SRT treatment. These errors need to be corrected at each planned couch angle, or the PTV margin should be enlarged.

Residual setup error in the canine intracranial region after megavoltage, kilovoltage, or cone-beam computed tomographic image guidance for radiation therapy

Sources of residual setup error after image guidance include image localization accuracy, errors associated with image registration, and inability of some treatment couches to correct submillimeter translational errors and/or pitch and roll errors. The purpose of this experimental study was to measure setup error after image-guided correction of the canine intracranial region, using a four degrees-of-freedom couch capable of 1 mm translational moves. Six cadaver dogs were positioned 45 times as for clinical treatment using a vacuum deformable body cushion, a customizable head cushion, a thermoplastic mask and an indexed maxillary plate with a dental mould. The location of five fiducial markers in the skull bones was compared between the reference position and after megavoltage (MV), kilovoltage (kV) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided correction using orthogonal kV images. The mean three-dimensional distance vectors (3DDV) after MV, kV and CBCT-guided correction were 1.7, 1.5 and 2.2 mm, respectively. All values were significantly different (P < .01). The 95th percentiles of the 3DDV after online MV, kV and CBCT-guided correction were 2.8, 2.6 and 3.6 mm, respectively. Residual setup error in the clinical scenario examined was on the order of millimetres and should be considered when choosing PTV margins for image-guided radiation therapy of the canine intracranial region.

Frameless Image-Guided Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastasis Using VMAT: A Review and an Institutional Experience

We undertook a structured review of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using linear particle accelerator (linac) equipment, focusing on volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technology, and frameless image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), for the treatment of brain metastases. We analyzed the role of linac SRS and its clinical applications, exploring stereotactic localization. Historically, there was a shift from fixed frames to frameless approaches, moving toward less invasive treatments. Thus, we reviewed the concepts of VMAT for multiple-target applications, comparing its dosimetric and technical features to those of other available techniques. We evaluated relevant technical issues and discussed the planning parameters that have gained worldwide acceptance to date. Thus, we reviewed the current literature on the clinical aspects of SRS, especially its main indications and how the advantages of VMAT may achieve clinical benefits in such scenarios. Finally, we reported our institutional results on IGRT-VMAT for SRS treatments for patients with multiple brain metastases.

Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) aims to deliver a spatially conformal dose of radiation to tumours while maximizing the dose sparing to healthy tissues. However, the internal patient anatomy is constantly moving due to respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and urinary activity. The long term goal of the RT community to 'see what we treat, as we treat' and to act on this information instantaneously has resulted in rapid technological innovation. Specialized treatment machines, such as robotic or gimbal-steered linear accelerators (linac) with in-room imaging suites, have been developed specifically for real-time treatment adaptation. Additional equipment, such as stereoscopic kilovoltage (kV) imaging, ultrasound transducers and electromagnetic transponders, has been developed for intrafraction motion monitoring on conventional linacs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been integrated with cobalt treatment units and more recently with linacs. In addition to hardware innovation, software development has played a substantial role in the development of motion monitoring methods based on respiratory motion surrogates and planar kV or Megavoltage (MV) imaging that is available on standard equipped linacs. In this paper, we review and compare the different intrafraction motion monitoring methods proposed in the literature and demonstrated in real-time on clinical data as well as their possible future developments. We then discuss general considerations on validation and quality assurance for clinical implementation. Besides photon RT, particle therapy is increasingly used to treat moving targets. However, transferring motion monitoring technologies from linacs to particle beam lines presents substantial challenges. Lessons learned from the implementation of real-time intrafraction monitoring for photon RT will be used as a basis to discuss the implementation of these methods for particle RT.

Frame-based radiosurgery of multiple metastases using single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy technique

Single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique can provide stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment with improved delivery efficiency for treating multiple metastases. Nevertheless, planning is time consuming and verification of frame‐based SRS setup, especially at noncoplanar angles, can be challenging. We report on a single‐isocenter VMAT technique with a special focus on improving treatment workflow and delivery verification to exploit the minimized patient motion of the frame‐based SRS. We developed protocols for preplanning and verification for VMAT and evaluated them for ten patient cases. Preplans based on MRI were used to generate comparable treatment plans using CT taken on the day of treatment after frame placement. Target positioning accuracy was evaluated by stereoscopic in‐room kV imaging. Dosimetric accuracy of the noncoplanar plan delivery was validated using measurement‐guided 3D dose reconstruction as well as film‐based end‐to‐end test with a Rando phantom. Average absolute differences of homogeneity indices, conformity indices, and V12Gy between MR preplans and CT‐based plans were within 5%. In‐room imaging positioning accuracy of 0.4 mm was verified to be independent of the distance to the isocenter. For treatment verification, average local and global passing rates of the 3D gamma (1 mm, 3%) were 86% and 99%, respectively. D99 values were matched within 5% for individual target structures (>0.5 cc). Additional film analysis confirmed dosimetric accuracy for small targets that had large verification errors in the 3D dose reconstruction. Our results suggest that the advantages of frame‐based SRS and noncoplanar single‐isocenter VMAT technique can be combined for efficient and accurate treatment of patients with multiple metastases.

Evaluation of a novel software application for magnetic resonance distortion correction in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery

This study aimed to validate a novel commercially available software for correcting spatial distortion in cranial magnetic resonance (MR) images. This software has been used to assess the dosimetric impact of MR distortion in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments of vestibular schwannomas (VSs). Five MR datasets were intentionally distorted. Each distorted MR dataset was corrected using the Cranial Distortion software, obtaining a new corrected MR dataset (MRcorr). The accuracy of the correction was quantified by calculating the target registration error (TRE) for 6 anatomical landmarks identified in the co-registered MRcorr and planning computed tomography (pCT) images. Nine VS cases were included to investigate the impact of the MR distortion in SRS plans. Each SRS plan was calculated on the pCT (1 × 1 × 1 mm³ voxel) with the target and organs at risk (OARs) delineated using the planning MR dataset. This MR dataset was then corrected (MRcorr) using the Cranial Distortion software. Geometrical agreement between the original target and the corresponding corrected target was assessed using several metrics: MacDonald criteria, mean distance to agreement (MDA), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Target coverage (D99%) and maximum doses (D2%) to ipsilateral cochlea and brainstem resulting on the MRcorr dataset were compared with the original values. TRE values (0.6 mm ± 0.3 mm) and differences found in Macdonald criteria (0.3 mm ± 0.4 mm and 0.3 mm ± 0.3 mm) and MDA (0.8 mm ± 0.2 mm) were mostly within the voxel size dimension of the pCT scan (1 × 1 × 1 mm³). High similarity (DSC > 0.7) between the original and corrected targets was found. Small dose differences for the original and corrected structures were found: 0.1 Gy ± 0.1 Gy for target D99%, 0.2 Gy ± 0.3 Gy for cochlea D2%, and 0.1 Gy ± 0.1 Gy for brainstem D2%. Our study shows that Distortion Correction software can be a helpful tool to detect and adequately correct brain MR distortions. However, a negligible dosimetric impact of MR distortion has been detected in our clinical practice.

Image-Guided Positioning in Intracranial Non-Invasive Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Brain Metastasis

Aims and background

The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility of non-invasive image-guided radiosurgery to improve patient comfort and quality of life in stereotactic radiosurgery planning and treatment of patients with brain metastasis. Precise immobilization is a rule of thumb for stereotactic radiosurgery. Non-invasive immobilization techniques have the potential of improved quality of life compared with invasive procedures.

Methods and study design

A total of 92 lesions from 42 patients with brain metastasis were included in the study. After immobilization with a thermoplastic mask and a bite-block unlike the invasive frame-based procedure, planning computed tomography images were acquired and fused with magnetic resonance images. After contouring, intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IM-SRS) planning was done, and the patients were re-immobilized on the treatment couch for the therapy procedures. While patients were on the treatment couch, kilovoltage-cone beam computed tomography images were acquired to determine setup errors and achieve on-line correction and then repeated after on-line correction to confirm precise tumor localization. The patients then underwent single-fraction definitive treatment.

Results

For the 92 lesions treated, mean ± SD values of translational setup corrections in X (lateral), Y (longitudinal), and Z (vertical) dimensions were 0.7 ± 0.7 mm, 0.8 ± 0.7 mm, and 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and rotational set-up corrections were 0.5 ± 1.1°, 0.06 ± 1.1°, and -0.1 ± 1.1° in X (pitch), Y (roll), and Z (yaw), respectively. The mean three-dimensional correction vector was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm.

Conclusions

Non-invasive image-guided radiosurgery for brain metastasis is feasible, and the non-invasive treatment approach can be routinely used in clinical practice to improve patientís quality of life.

To frame or not to frame? Cone-beam CT-based analysis of head immobilization devices specific to linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy

Purpose

Noninvasive frameless systems are increasingly being utilized for head immobilization in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Knowing the head positioning reproducibility of frameless systems and their respective ability to limit intrafractional head motion is important in order to safely perform SRS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the intrafractional head motion of an invasive frame and a series of frameless systems for single fraction SRS and fractionated/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT/HF‐SRT).

Methods

The noninvasive PinPoint system was used on 15 HF‐SRT and 21 SRS patients. Intrafractional motion for these patients was compared to 15 SRS patients immobilized with Cosman‐Roberts‐Wells (CRW) frame, and a FSRT population that respectively included 23, 32, and 15 patients immobilized using Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame, Uniframe, and Orfit. All HF‐SRT and FSRT patients were treated using intensity‐modulated radiation therapy on a linear accelerator equipped with cone‐beam CT (CBCT) and a robotic couch. SRS patients were treated using gantry‐mounted stereotactic cones. The CBCT image‐guidance protocol included initial setup, pretreatment and post‐treatment verification images. The residual error determined from the post‐treatment CBCT was used as a surrogate for intrafractional head motion during treatment.

Results

The mean intrafractional motion over all fractions with PinPoint was 0.62 ± 0.33 mm and 0.45 ± 0.33 mm, respectively, for the HF‐SRT and SRS cohort of patients (P‐value = 0.266). For CRW, GTC, Orfit, and Uniframe, the mean intrafractional motions were 0.30 ± 0.21 mm, 0.54 ± 0.76 mm, 0.73 ± 0.49 mm, and 0.76 ± 0.51 mm, respectively. For CRW, PinPoint, GTC, Orfit, and Uniframe, intrafractional motion exceeded 1.5 mm in 0%, 0%, 5%, 6%, and 8% of all fractions treated, respectively.

Conclusions

The noninvasive PinPoint system and the invasive CRW frame stringently limit cranial intrafractional motion, while the latter provides superior immobilization. Based on the results of this study, our clinical practice for malignant tumors has evolved to apply an invasive CRW frame only for metastases in eloquent locations to minimize normal tissue exposure.

Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning

PURPOSE

Anatomic distortion is present in all magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data because of nonlinearity of gradient fields; it measures up to several millimeters. We evaluated the potential for uncorrected MRI to lead to geometric miss of the target volume in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-eight SRS cases were studied retrospectively. MRI scans were corrected for gradient nonlinearity distortion in 3 dimensions, and gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were contoured. The manufacturer-specified distortion field was then reapplied to GTV masks to allow measurement of GTV displacement in uncorrected images. The uncorrected GTV was used for SRS planning, and the dose received by the true (corrected) GTV was measured.

RESULTS

Median displacement of the GTV resulting from gradient distortion was 1.2 mm (interquartile range, 0.1-2.3 mm), with a minimum of 0 mm and a maximum of 3.9 mm. Eight of the 28 cases met a priori criteria for "geometric miss."

CONCLUSIONS

Although MRI distortion is often subtle on visual inspection, there is a significant clinical impact of this distortion on SRS planning. Distortion-corrected MRI should uniformly be used for intracranial radiosurgery planning because uncorrected MRI can lead to potential geometric miss.

Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient setup accuracy and quantify individual and cumulative positioning uncertainties associated with different hardware and software components of the stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system. A statistical model is used to evaluate positioning uncertainties of the different components of SRS/SRT treatment with the Brainlab 6D ExacTrac system using the positioning shifts of 35 patients having cranial lesions. All these patients are immobilized with rigid head‐and‐neck masks, simulated with Brainlab localizer and planned with iPlan treatment planning system. Stereoscopic X‐ray images (XC) are acquired and registered to corresponding digitally reconstructed radiographs using bony‐anatomy matching to calculate 6D translational and rotational shifts. When the shifts are within tolerance (0.7 mm and 1°), treatment is initiated. Otherwise corrections are applied and additional X‐rays (XV) are acquired to verify that patient position is within tolerance. The uncertainties from the mask, localizer, IR ‐frame, X‐ray imaging, MV, and kV isocentricity are quantified individually. Mask uncertainty (translational: lateral, longitudinal, vertical; rotational: pitch, roll, yaw) is the largest and varies with patients in the range (−2.07−3.71mm,−5.82−5.62mm,−5.84−3.61mm;−2.10−2.40∘,−2.23−2.60∘,and−2.7−3.00∘) obtained from mean of XC shifts for each patient. Setup uncertainty in IR positioning (0.88, 2.12, 1.40 mm, and 0.64°, 0.83°, 0.96°) is extracted from standard deviation of XC. Systematic uncertainties of the frame (0.18, 0.25, −1.27mm, −0.32∘, 0.18°, and 0.47°) and localizer (−0.03, −0.01, 0.03 mm, and −0.03∘, 0.00°, −0.01∘) are extracted from means of all XV setups and mean of all XC distributions, respectively. Uncertainties in isocentricity of the MV radiotherapy machine are (0.27, 0.24, 0.34 mm) and kV imager (0.15, −0.4, 0.21 mm). A statistical model is developed to evaluate the individual and cumulative systematic and random positioning uncertainties induced by the different hardware and software components of the 6D ExacTrac system. The uncertainties from the mask, localizer, IR frame, X‐ray imaging, couch, MV linac, and kV imager isocentricity are quantified using statistical modeling.

PACS number(s): 87.56.B‐, 87.59.B‐

A preplanning method for stereotactic radiosurgery to improve treatment workflow

Frame‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) requires fixation of an invasive head ring to ensure accurate targeting. Minimizing waiting time with a fixed head ring is important for patient comfort and satisfaction. We report a practical preplanning solution for the Brainlab iPlan treatment planning system that reduces waiting time by expediting the planning process on treatment day. A water‐filled anthropomorphic head phantom was used to acquire a surrogate CT image set for preplanning and fused with patient's MRI, which was obtained before the day of treatment. Once an acceptable preplan was obtained, it was saved as a plan template and the phantom image set was removed from the Brainlab database to prevent any confusion and mix‐up of image sets. On the treatment day, the patient's CT and MRI were fused, and the customized beam settings of the preplan template were then applied and optimized. Up to 10‐fold of reduction in treatment plan time was demonstrated by bench testing with multiple planners and a variety of cases. Loading the plan template and fine‐tuning the preconfigured beam settings took only a small fraction of the preplan time to restore the conformity and dose falloff comparable to those of the preplan. For instance, preplan time was 2 hr for a two‐isocenter case, whereas, it took less than 20 min for a less experienced planner to plan it on the day of treatment using the preplan method. The SRS preplanning technique implemented in this study for the Brainlab iPlan treatment planning system offers an opportunity to explore possible beam configurations thoroughly, optimize planning parameters, resolve gantry angle clearance issues, and communicate and address challenges with physicians before the treatment day. Preplanning has been proven to improve plan quality and to improve efficiency in our clinic, especially for multiple‐isocenter and dosimetrically challenging cases.

PACS number(s): 87.53.Ly, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.Gh, 87.55.tm

Re-irradiation of Recurrent Pineal Germ Cell Tumors with Radiosurgery: Report of Two Cases and Review of Literature

Primary intracranial germ cell tumors are rare, representing less than 5% of all central nervous system tumors. Overall, the majority of germ cell tumors are germinomas and approximately one-third are non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT), which include teratoma, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor (endodermal sinus tumor), choriocarcinoma, or mixed malignant germ cell tumor. Germ cell tumors may secrete detectable levels of proteins into the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid, and these proteins can be used for diagnostic purposes or to monitor tumor recurrence. Germinomas have long been known to be highly curable with radiation therapy alone. However, many late effects of whole brain or craniospinal irradiation have been well documented. Strategies have been developed to reduce the dose and volume of radiation therapy, often in combination with chemotherapy. In contrast, patients with NGGCT have a poorer prognosis, with about 60% cured with multimodality chemoradiation. There are no standard approaches for relapsed germ cell tumors. Options may be limited by prior treatment. Radiation therapy has been utilized alone or in combination with chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy and transplant. We discuss two cases and review options for frameless radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy.

A comprehensive evaluation of treatment accuracy, including end-to-end tests and clinical data, applied to intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A methodology is presented to quantify the uncertainty associated with linear accelerator-based frameless intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) combining end-to-end phantom tests and clinical data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The following steps of the SRT chain were analysed: planning computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scans registration, target volume delineation, CT and cone beam CT (CBCT) registration and intrafraction-patient displacement. The overall accuracy was established with an end-to-end test. The measured uncertainties were combined, deriving the total systematic (ΣT) and random (σT) error components, to estimate the GTV-PTV margin.

RESULTS

The uncertainty in the MR-CT registration was on average 0.40mm (averaged over AP, CC and LR directions). Rotational variations were smaller than 0.5° in all directions. Interobser variation in GTV delineation was on average 0.29mm. The uncertainty in the CBCT-CT registration was on average 0.15mm. Again, rotational variations were smaller than 0.5° in all directions. The systematic and random intrafraction displacement errors were on average 0.55mm and 0.45mm, respectively. The systematic and random positional errors from the end-to-end test were on average 0.49mm and 0.53mm, respectively. Combining these uncertainties resulted in an average ΣT=0.9mm and σT=0.7mm and an average GTV-PTV margin of 2.8mm.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive methodology including end-to-end tests enabled a GTV-PTV margin calculation considering all sources of uncertainties. This generic method can also be used for other treatment sites.

Targeting Accuracy of Image-Guided Radiosurgery for Intracranial Lesions: A Comparison Across Multiple Linear Accelerator Platforms

PURPOSE

To evaluate the overall positioning accuracy of image-guided intracranial radiosurgery across multiple linear accelerator platforms.

METHODS

A computed tomography scan with a slice thickness of 1.0 mm was acquired of an anthropomorphic head phantom in a BrainLAB U-frame mask. The phantom was embedded with three 5-mm diameter tungsten ball bearings, simulating a central, a left, and an anterior cranial lesion. The ball bearings were positioned to radiation isocenter under ExacTrac X-ray or cone-beam computed tomography image guidance on 3 Linacs: (1) ExacTrac X-ray localization on a Novalis Tx; (2) cone-beam computed tomography localization on the Novalis Tx; (3) cone-beam computed tomography localization on a TrueBeam; and (4) cone-beam computed tomography localization on an Edge. Each ball bearing was positioned 5 times to the radiation isocenter with different initial setup error following the 4 image guidance procedures on the 3 Linacs, and the mean (µ) and one standard deviation (σ) of the residual error were compared.

RESULTS

Averaged overall 3 ball bearing locations, the vector length of the residual setup error in mm (µ ± σ) was 0.6 ± 0.2, 1.0 ± 0.5, 0.2 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 on ExacTrac X-ray localization on a Novalis Tx, cone-beam computed tomography localization on the Novalis Tx, cone-beam computed tomography localization on a TrueBeam, and cone-beam computed tomography localization on an Edge, with their range in mm being 0.4 to 1.1, 0.4 to 1.9, 0.1 to 0.5, and 0.2 to 0.6, respectively. The congruence between imaging and radiation isocenters in mm was 0.6 ± 0.1, 0.7 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1, and 0.2 ± 0.1, for the 4 systems, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting accuracy comparable to frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery can be achieved with image-guided intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatment.

Quality assurance for nonradiographic radiotherapy localization and positioning systems: report of Task Group 147

New technologies continue to be developed to improve the practice of radiation therapy. As several of these technologies have been implemented clinically, the Therapy Committee and the Quality Assurance and Outcomes Improvement Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine commissioned Task Group 147 to review the current nonradiographic technologies used for localization and tracking in radiotherapy. The specific charge of this task group was to make recommendations about the use of nonradiographic methods of localization, specifically; radiofrequency, infrared, laser, and video based patient localization and monitoring systems. The charge of this task group was to review the current use of these technologies and to write quality assurance guidelines for the use of these technologies in the clinical setting. Recommendations include testing of equipment for initial installation as well as ongoing quality assurance. As the equipment included in this task group continues to evolve, both in the type and sophistication of technology and in level of integration with treatment devices, some of the details of how one would conduct such testing will also continue to evolve. This task group, therefore, is focused on providing recommendations on the use of this equipment rather than on the equipment itself, and should be adaptable to each user's situation in helping develop a comprehensive quality assurance program.

A pooled analysis of arc-based image-guided simultaneous integrated boost radiation therapy for oligometastatic brain metastases

PURPOSE

To report pooled overall survival and time to radiological intracranial progression results related to arc-based image-guided radiotherapy for dose-escalation of oligometastatic disease of the brain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Anonymized patient, tumor, and treatment data were pooled from the VU University medical center (VUmc) and the London Regional Cancer Program (LRCP) for patients treated with whole brain radiotherapy (20 Gy/5 VUmc, 30 Gy/10 LRCP) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to individual intracranial lesions (40 Gy/5 VUmc, 35-60 Gy/10 LRCP) to perform survival/intracranial control outcome analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were treated by both the LRCP (n=70) and VUmc (n=50) between 2005 and 2010. Median lesional dose BED3,10 for the entire cohort of patients were 147 and 72 Gy, respectively. Median follow-up for the entire cohort of patients was 4.7 months with median follow-up of 5.2 months for living patients. On multivariable analysis, primary lung cancer (HR 2.044), presence of systemic metastatic disease (HR 1.937), and lower baseline WHO performance status (HR 1.742) were significant (p<0.05) predictors of shorter overall survival. Cumulative brain metastases volume (HR 1.014, p=0.06) was of borderline significance on analysis of intracranial control.

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis has provided robust outcome data regarding the use of arc-based radiotherapy with SIB.

Cone Beam CT (CBCT) Evaluation of Inter- and Intra-Fraction Motion for Patients Undergoing Brain Radiotherapy Immobilized using a Commercial Thermoplastic Mask on a Robotic Couch

Patients receiving fractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for brain tumors are often immobilized with a thermoplastic mask; however, masks do not perfectly re-orient the patient due to factors including the maximum pressure which can be applied to the face, deformations of the mask assembly, patient compliance, etc. Consequently, ~3–5 mm PTV margins (beyond the CTV) are often recommended. We aimed to determine if smaller PTV margins are feasible using mask immobilization coupled with 1) a gantry mounted CBCT image guidance system and 2) position corrections provided by a full six-degree of freedom (6-DOF) robotic couch. A cohort of 34 brain tumor patients was treated with fractionated IMRT. After the mask set-up, an initial CBCT was obtained and registered to the planning CT. The robotic couch corrected the misalignments in all 6-DOF and a pre-treatment verification CBCT was then obtained. The results indicated a repositioning alignment within our threshold of 1.5 mm (3D). Treatment was subsequently delivered. A post-treatment CBCT was obtained to quantify intra-fraction motion. Initial, pre-treatment and post-treatment CBCT image data was analyzed. A total of 505 radiation fractions were delivered to the 34 patients resulting in ~1800 CBCT scans. The initial median 3D (magnitude) set-up positioning error was 2.60 mm. Robotic couch corrections reduced the 3D median error to 0.53 mm prior to treatment. Intra-fraction movement was responsible for increasing the median 3D positioning error to 0.86 mm, with 8% of fractions having a 3D positioning error greater than 2 mm. Clearly CBCT image guidance coupled with a robotic 6-DOF couch dramatically improved the positioning accuracy for patients immobilized in a thermoplastic mask system; however, such intra-fraction motion would be too large for single fraction radiosurgery.

[Ballistic quality assurance]

This review describes the ballistic quality assurance for stereotactic intracranial irradiation treatments delivered with Gamma Knife® either dedicated or adapted medical linear accelerators. Specific and periodic controls should be performed in order to check the mechanical stability for both irradiation and collimation systems. If this step remains under the responsibility of the medical physicist, it should be done in agreement with the manufacturer's technical support. At this time, there are no recent published guidelines. With technological developments, both frequency and accuracy should be assessed in each institution according to the treatment mode: single versus hypofractionnated dose, circular collimator versus micro-multileaf collimators. In addition, "end-to-end" techniques are mandatory to find the origin of potential discrepancies and to estimate the global ballistic accuracy of the delivered treatment. Indeed, they include frames, non-invasive immobilization devices, localizers, multimodal imaging for delineation and in-room positioning imaging systems. The final precision that could be reasonably achieved is more or less 1mm.

Immobilization precision of a modified GTC frame

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify the interfraction reproducibility and intrafraction immobilization precision of a modified GTC frame. The error of the patient alignment and imaging systems were measured using a cranial skull phantom, with simulated, predetermined shifts. The kV setup images were acquired with a room‐mounted set of kV sources and panels. Calculated translations and rotations provided by the computer alignment software relying upon three implanted fiducials were compared to the known shifts, and the accuracy of the imaging and positioning systems was calculated. Orthogonal kV setup images for 45 proton SRT patients and 1002 fractions (average 22.3 fractions/patient) were analyzed for interfraction and intrafraction immobilization precision using a modified GTC frame. The modified frame employs a radiotransparent carbon cup and molded pillow to allow for more treatment angles from posterior directions for cranial lesions. Patients and the phantom were aligned with three 1.5 mm stainless steel fiducials implanted into the skull. The accuracy and variance of the patient positioning and imaging systems were measured to be 0.10±0.06 mm, with the maximum uncertainty of rotation being ±0.07°.957 pairs of interfraction image sets and 974 intrafraction image sets were analyzed. 3D translations and rotations were recorded. The 3D vector interfraction setup reproducibility was 0.13 mm ±1.8 mm for translations and the largest uncertainty of ±1.07° for rotations. The intrafraction immobilization efficacy was 0.19 mm ±0.66 mm for translations and the largest uncertainty of ±0.50° for rotations. The modified GTC frame provides reproducible setup and effective intrafraction immobilization, while allowing for the complete range of entrance angles from the posterior direction.

PACS number: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.Qr

A phase II multi-institutional study assessing simultaneous in-field boost helical tomotherapy for 1-3 brain metastases

Background

Our research group has previously published a dosimetric planning study that demonstrated that a 60 Gy/10 fractions intralesional boost with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to 30 Gy/10 fractions was biologically equivalent with a stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) boost of 18 Gy/1 fraction with 30 Gy/10 fractions WBRT. Helical tomotherapy (HT) was found to be dosimetrically equivalent to SRS in terms of target coverage and superior to SRS in terms of normal tissue tolerance. A phase I trial has been now completed at our institution with a total of 60 enrolled patients and 48 evaluable patients. The phase II dose has been determined to be the final phase I cohort dose of 60 Gy/10 fractions.

Methods/Design

The objective of this clinical trial is to subject the final phase I cohort dose to a phase II assessment of the endpoints of overall survival, intracranial control (ICC) and intralesional control (ILC). We hypothesize HT would be considered unsuitable for further study if the median OS for patients treated with the HT SIB technique is degraded by 2 months, or the intracranial progression-free rates (ICC and ILC) are inferior by 10% or greater compared to the expected results with treatment by whole brain plus SRS as defined by the RTOG randomized trial. A sample size of 93 patients was calculated based on these parameters as well as the statistical assumptions of alpha = 0.025 and beta = 0.1 due to multiple statistical testing. Secondary assessments of toxicity, health-related quality-of-life, cognitive changes, and tumor response are also integrated into this research protocol.

Discussion

To summarize, the purpose of this phase II trial is to assess this non-invasive alternative to SRS in terms of central nervous system (CNS) control when compared to SRS historical controls. A follow-up phase III trial may be required depending on the results of this trial in order to definitively assess non-inferiority/superiority of this approach. Ultimately, the purpose of this line of research is to provide patients with metastatic disease to the brain a shorter course, dose intense, non-invasive radiation treatment with equivalent or improved CNS control/survival and health-related quality-of-life/toxicity profile when compared to SRS radiotherapy.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov - NCT01543542.

Development of an optical-based image guidance system: technique detecting external markers behind a full facemask

PURPOSE

Optical image-guided systems (e.g., AlignRT, frameless SonArray, ExacTrac) have been used with advantages of avoiding excessive radiation exposure and real-time patient monitoring. Although these systems showed proven accuracy, they need to modify a full facemask for patients with H&N cancer and brain tumor. We developed an optical-based guidance system to manage interfractional and intrafractional setup errors by tracking external markers behind a full facemask.

METHODS

Infra-red (IR) reflecting markers were attached on the face of a head phantom and then the phantom was immobilized by a full face thermoplastic mask. A stereo camera system consisting of two CCD cameras was mounted on the inferior wall of treatment room. The stereo camera system was calibrated to reconstruct 3D coordinates of multiple markers with respect to the isocenter using the direct linear transform (DLT) algorithm. The real-time position of the phantom was acquired, through the stereo camera system, by detecting the IR markers behind the full facemask. The detection errors with respect to the reference positions of planning CT images were calculated in six degrees of freedom (6-DOF) by a rigid-body registration technique.

RESULTS

The calibration accuracy of the system was in submillimeter (0.33 mm +/- 0.27 mm), which was comparable to others. The mean distance between each of marker positions of optical images and planning CT images was 0.50 mm +/- 0.67 mm. The maximum deviations of 6-DOF registration were less than 1 mm and 1 degrees for the couch translation and rotation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed system showed the accuracy and consistency comparable to the commercial optical guided systems, while allowing us to simultaneously immobilize patients with a full face thermoplastic mask.

Feasibility study of performing IGRT system daily QA using a commercial QA device

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using a single QA device for comprehensive, efficient daily QA of a linear accelerator (Linac) and three image‐guided stereotactic positioning systems (IGSPSs). The Sun Nuclear Daily QA 3 (DQA3) device was used to perform daily dosimetry and mechanical accuracy tests for an Elekta Linac, as well as daily image geometric and isocenter coincidence accuracy tests for three IGSPSs: the AlignRT surface imaging system; the frameless SonArray optical tracking System (FSA) and the Elekta kV CBCT. The DQA3 can also be used for couch positioning, repositioning, and rotational tests during the monthly QA. Based on phantom imaging, the Linac coordinate system determined using AlignRT was within 0.7 mm/0.6° of that of the CBCT system. The difference is attributable to the different calibration methods that are utilized for these two systems. The laser alignment was within 0.5 mm of the isocenter location determined with the three IGSPSs. The ODI constancy was ± 0.5 mm. For gantry and table angles of 0°, the mean isocenter displacement vectors determined using the three systems were within 0.7 mm and 0.6° of one another. Isocenter rotational offsets measured with the systems were all ≤ 0.5°. For photon and electron beams tested over a period of eight months, the output was verified to remain within 2%, energy variations were within 2%, and the symmetry and flatness were within 1%. The field size and light‐radiation coincidence were within 1mm ± 1 mm. For dosimetry reproducibility, the standard deviation was within 0.2% for all tests and all energies, except for photon energy variation which was 0.6%. The total measurement time for all tasks took less than 15 minutes per QA session compared to 40 minutes with our previous procedure, which utilized an individual QA device for each IGSPS. The DQA3 can be used for accurate and efficient Linac and IGSPS daily QA. It shortens QA device setup time, eliminates errors introduced by changing phantoms to perform different tests, and streamlines the task of performing dosimetric checks.

PACS number: 87.56.Fc

Feasibility of using cone-beam CT to verify and reposition the optically guided target localization of linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

The optically guided target localization had been developed for linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Unlike the traditional laser localization, the optical guided target localization utilizes a digital system to position patient. Although the system has been proven accurate and robust, it takes away the capability of physicist to directly double check the target position prior to irradiation. Any error from system calibration, data transformation, or head ring position maintenance will not be caught. The purpose of this work is to investigate the possibility of using cone-beam CT (CBCT) to double check the optically guided SRS target localization and reposition the patient.

METHODS

A SRS quality assurance (QA) phantom was used in the study. The phantom mounted with SRS head frame was scanned by computer tomography (CT) and planned according to the SRS radiation treatment planning process. A target isocenter is defined and transferred to the optically guided target localization system. The phantom was then transported to the linear accelerator room and localized at the initial position agreed by the optically guided target localization system and the CBCT system. Tests were conducted by moving/rotating the phantom to a set of preset offsets and taking CBCT images. Shifts detected by CBCT were compared with the preset offsets. Agreements between them were studied to see how well the CBCT was in discovering the optically guided target localization error.

RESULTS

Experiment results demonstrated good agreement between the CBCT detected phantom shift and the preset offset, when the offset is above 1 mm shift or 0.2 degree rotation. Offset less than 1 mm shift or 0.2 degree rotation was not detectable by CBCT.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that the CBCT is able to discover the optically guided target localization error due to the system calibration or had ring migration. It is a valuable second check tool for SRS target localization quality assurance. The accuracy of CBCT in estimating patient positioning deviation satisfies the SRS procedures with generous tumor size and margin that can tolerate 1 mm or 0.2 degree accuracy. This avoids sending patient home without treatment. CBCT can be neither used as a primary SRS target localization nor can it be used to reposition the patient that cannot tolerate 1 mm shift or 0.2 degree rotation.

Characterization of a real-time surface image-guided stereotactic positioning system

PURPOSE

The AlignRT3C system is an image-guided stereotactic positioning system (IGSPS) that provides real-time target localization. This study involves the first use of this system with three camera pods. The authors have evaluated its localization accuracy and tracking ability using a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system and an optical tracking system in a clinical setting.

METHODS

A modified Rando head-and-neck phantom and five patients receiving intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) were used to evaluate the calibration, registration, and position-tracking accuracies of the AlignRT3C system and to study surface reconstruction uncertainties, including the effects due to interfractional and intrafractional motion, skin tone, room light level, camera temperature, and image registration region of interest selection. System accuracy was validated through comparison with the Elekta kV CBCT system (XVI) and the Varian frameless SonArray (FSA) optical tracking system. Surface-image data sets were acquired with the AlignRT3C daily for the evaluation of pretreatment and interfractional and intrafractional motion for each patient. Results for two different reference image sets, planning CT surface contours (CTS) and previously recorded AlignRT3C optical surface images (ARTS), are reported.

RESULTS

The system origin displacements for the AlignRT3C and XVI systems agreed to within 1.3 mm and 0.7 degrees. Similar results were seen for AlignRT3C vs FSA. For the phantom displacements having couch angles of 0 degrees, those that utilized ART_S references resulted in a mean difference of 0.9 mm/0.4 degrees with respect to XVI and 0.3 mm/0.2 degrees with respect to FSA. For phantom displacements of more than +/- 10 mm and +/- 3 degrees, the maximum discrepancies between AlignRT and the XVI and FSA systems were 3.0 and 0.4 mm, respectively. For couch angles up to +/- 90 degrees, the mean (max.) difference between the AlignRT3C and FSA was 1.2 (2.3) mm/0.7 degrees (1.2 degrees). For all tests, the mean registration errors obtained using the CT_S references were approximately 1.3 mm/1.0 degrees larger than those obtained using the ART_S references. For the patient study, the mean differences in the pretreatment displacements were 0.3 mm/0.2 degrees between the AlignRT3C and XVI systems and 1.3 mm/1 degrees between the FSA and XVI systems. For noncoplanar treatments, interfractional motion displacements obtained using the ART_S and CT_S references resulted in 90th percentile differences within 2.1 mm/0.8 degrees and 3.3 mm/0.3 degrees, respectively, compared to the FSA system. Intrafractional displacements that were tracked for a maximum of 14 min were within 1 mm/1 degrees of those obtained with the FSA system. Uncertainties introduced by the bite-tray were as high as 3 mm/2 degrees for one patient. The combination of gantry, aSi detector panel, and x-ray tube blockage effects during the CBCT acquisition resulted in a registration error of approximately 3 mm. No skin-tone or surface deformation effects were seen with the limited patient sample.

CONCLUSIONS

AlignRT3C can be used as a nonionizing IGSPS with accuracy comparable to current image/marker-based systems. IGSPS and CBCT can be combined for high-precision positioning without the need for patient-attached localization devices.

Pretreatment setup verification by cone beam CT in stereotactic radiosurgery: phantom study

Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging may be useful in verifying patient position in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). To evaluate its efficacy, we investigated isocenter differences in the radiation beam and CBCT with respect to the achievable setup of a conventional frame-based SRS system. A verification phantom constructed from two plastic boards and Gafchromic-EBT film (4 × 4 cm²) pricked with a pin, was scanned by simulation CT. An isocenter at the tip of pin was planned in the treatment planning system and positioned using stereotactic coordinates. Star-shot irradiation was performed to evaluate the difference between the radiation isocenter and the target (pinhole). CBCT rotation of 200° with a micro multileaf collimator (m3) was performed and measured the isocenter difference between CBCT and the target (tip of pin) by comparing relative coordinates. Data acquisition was performed 13 times on different days and differences were analyzed by calculating mean and standard deviation. The mean difference between the radiation beam and the target (pinhole) and between radiation beam and CBCT isocenter, were 0.6 ± 0.2 mm and 0.8 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. The setup accuracy of conventional stereotactic coordinates and the isocenter accuracy of CBCT complied with AAPM Report No. 54.

Phase I trial of simultaneous in-field boost with helical tomotherapy for patients with one to three brain metastases

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery is an alternative to surgical resection for selected intracranial lesions. Integrated image-guided intensity-modulated-capable radiotherapy platforms such as helical tomotherapy (HT) could potentially replace traditional radiosurgery apparatus. The present study's objective was to determine the maximally tolerated dose of a simultaneous in-field boost integrated with whole brain radiotherapy for palliative treatment of patients with one to three brain metastases using HT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The inclusion/exclusion criteria and endpoints were consistent with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9508 radiosurgery trial. The cohorts were constructed with a 3 + 3 design; however, additional patients were enrolled in the lower dose tolerable cohorts during the toxicity assessment periods. Whole brain radiotherapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions) was delivered with a 5-30-Gy (total lesion dose of 35-60 Gy in 10 fractions) simultaneous in-field boost delivered to the brain metastases. The maximally tolerated dose was determined by the frequency of neurologic Grade 3-5 National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0, dose-limiting toxicity events within each Phase I cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients received treatment in the 35-Gy (n = 3), 40-Gy (n = 16), 50-Gy (n = 15), 55-Gy (n = 8), and 60-Gy (n = 6) cohorts. No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity events in any of the trial cohorts. The 3-month RECIST assessments available for 32 of the 48 patients demonstrated a complete response in 2, a partial response in 16, stable disease in 6, and progressive disease in 8 patients.

CONCLUSION

The delivery of 60 Gy in 10 fractions to one to three brain metastases synchronously with 30 Gy whole brain radiotherapy was achieved without dose-limiting central nervous system toxicity as assessed 3 months after treatment. This approach is being tested in a Phase II efficacy trial.

Quality assessment of frameless fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography

PURPOSE

A quality assessment of intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was performed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Setup errors were analyzed for two groups of patients: (1) those who were positioned using a frameless SonArray (FSA) system and immobilized with a bite plate and thermoplastic (TP) mask (the bFSA group); and (2) those who were positioned by room laser and immobilized using a TP mask (the mLAS group).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A quality assurance phantom was used to study the system differences between FSA and CBCT. The quality assessment was performed using an Elekta Synergy imager (XVI) (Elekta Oncology Systems, Norcross, GA) and an On-Board Imager (OBI) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) for 25 patients. For the first three fractions, and weekly thereafter, the FSA system was used for patient positioning, after which CBCT was performed to obtain setup errors.

RESULTS

(1) Phantom tests: The mean differences in the isocenter displacements for the two systems was 1.2 ± 0.7 mm. No significant variances were seen between the XVI and OBI units (p~0.208). (2)Patient tests: The mean of the displacements between FSA and CBCT were independent of the CBCT system used; mean setup errors for the bFSA group were smaller (1.2 mm) than those of the mLAS group (3.2 mm) (p < 0.005). For the mLAS patients, the 90th percentile and the maximum rotational displacements were 3° and 5°, respectively. A 4-mm drift in setup accuracy occurred over the treatment course for 1 bFSA patient.

CONCLUSIONS

System differences of less than 1 mm between CBCT and FSA were seen. Error regression was observed for the bFSA patients, using CBCT (up to 4 mm) during the treatment course. For the mLAS group, daily CBCT imaging was needed to obtain acceptable setup accuracies.

Quality assurance of an image guided intracranial stereotactic positioning system for radiosurgery treatment with helical tomotherapy

The aim of this work was to determine the accuracy and precision of stereotactic localization and treatment delivery using a helical tomotherapy based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. A tomotherapy specific radiosurgery workflow was designed that exploits the system's on board megavotage CT (MVCT) imaging system so that it not only provides a pre-treatment volumetric verification image that can be used for stereotactic localization, eliminating the need for a patient-frame based coordinate system, but also supplies the treatment planning image. Using an imaging guidance based intracranial stereotactic positioning system, a head ring and tabletop docking device are used only for fixation, while image guidance is used for localization. Due to the unconventional workflow, a methodology for determining the localization accuracy was developed and results were compared to other linear accelerator based radiosurgery systems. In this work, the localization error using volumetric localization was found to be 0.45 mm +/- 0.17 mm, indicating a localization precision of 0.3 mm within a 95% confidence interval. In addition, procedures for testing the delivery accuracy of the Tomotherapy system are described. Results show that the accuracy of the delivery can be verified to within +/-1 voxel dimension. These results are well within conventional SRS tolerances and compare favorably to other linear accelerator based techniques.