Impact of anatomical interventions on the localization of post-prostatectomy cancer patients

Daily Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Postoperative Endometrial and Cervical Cancer With PTV Margin Reduction to 5 mm: Dosimetric Outcomes, Acute Toxicity, and First Clinical Experience

Purpose

This study evaluated the first clinical implementation of daily iterative cone beam computed tomography (iCBCT)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) in the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Methods and Materials

Seventeen consecutive patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study, with a reduced uniform 3-dimensional PTV margin of 5 mm. Treatment plans were designed to deliver 45 or 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions to PTV. Pre- and posttreatment ultrasound and iCBCT scans were performed to record intrafractional bladder and rectal volume changes. The accuracy of contouring, oART procedure time, dosimetric outcomes, and acute toxicity were evaluated.

Results

The average time from first iCBCT acquisition to completion of treatment was 22 minutes and 26 seconds. During this period, bladder volume increased by 44 cm3 using iCBCT contouring, whereas rectal volume remained stable (62.9 cm3 pretreatment vs 61.9 cm3 posttreatment). A total of 91.6% of influencers and 88.1% of CTVs required no or minor edits. The adapted plan was selected in all (434) fractions and significantly improved the dosimetry coverage for CTV and PTV, especially the vaginal PTV coverage by nearly 7% (P < .05). The adapted bladder Dmean was 104.61 cGy, and the rectum Dmean was 123.67 cGy, significantly lower than the scheduled plan of 108.24 and 128.19 cGy, respectively. The bone marrow and femur head left and right dosimetry were also improved with adaptation. Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were 24% and 0, respectively. There was a grade 3 acute toxicity of decreased white blood cell count in 1 patient.

Conclusions

Daily oART was associated with favorable dosimetry improvement and low acute toxicity, supporting its safety and efficacy for postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective randomized controlled cohort.

Preliminary Evaluation of PTV Margins for Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of the Prostatic Fossa

PURPOSE

In modern trials, traditional planning target volume (PTV) margins for postoperative prostate radiation therapy have been large (7-10 mm) to account for both daily changes in patient positioning and target deformation. With daily adaptive radiation therapy, these interfractional changes could be minimized, potentially reducing the margins required for treatment and improving adjacent normal-tissue dosimetry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted from March 2021 to November 2021. Patients receiving conventionally fractionated postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for prostate cancer with pretreatment and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging (pre-CBCT and post-CBCT, respectively) were included (248 paired images). Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical target volumes (pre-CTVs and post-CTVs) were contoured by a single observer on all CBCTs and verified by a second observer. Motion was calculated from pre-CTV to that of the post-CTV, and predicted margins were calculated with van Herk's formula. Adequate coverage of the proposed planning target volume (PTV) margin expansions (pre-PTV) were verified by determining overlap with post-CTV. In a smaller cohort (25 paired images), dosimetric changes with the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional plans in the Ethos emulator environment.

RESULTS

The estimated margins predicted to achieve ≥95% CTV coverage for 90% of the population were 1.6 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.2 mm (x-, y-, and z -xes, respectively), with 95% of the absolute region of interest displacement being within 1.9 mm, 2.8 mm, and 2.1 mm. After symmetrically expanding all pre-CTVs by 3 mm, the percentage of paired images achieving ≥95% CTV coverage was 97.1%. When comparing adaptive plans (3-mm margins) with scheduled plans (7-mm margins), rectum dosimetry significantly improved, with an average relative reduction in V40Gy[cc] of 59.2% and V65Gy[cc] of 79.5% (where V40Gy and V65Gy are defined as the volumes receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy or higher dose, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Online daily adaptive radiation therapy could significantly decrease PTV margins for prostatic PORT and improve rectal dosimetry, with a symmetrical expansion of 3 mm achieving excellent coverage in this cohort. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective cohort.

Does Interfraction Cone Beam Computed Tomography Improve Target Localization in Prostate Bed Radiotherapy?

Purpose:

In this prospective phase II study, we investigated whether cone beam computed tomography scan was a superior method of image-guided radiotherapy relative to 2D orthogonal kilovoltage images in the post-radical prostatectomy setting.

Methods:

A total of 419 treatment fractions were included in this analysis. The shifts required to align the patient for each treatment were performed using 3D matching between cone beam computed tomography scans and the corresponding computed tomography images used for planning. This was compared with the shifts obtained from 2D orthogonal kilovoltage images, matching with the corresponding digitally reconstructed radiographs. Patients did not have fiducials inserted to assist with localization. Interfractional changes in the bladder and rectal volumes were subsequently measured on the cone beam computed tomography images for each fraction and compared to the shift differences between orthogonal kilovoltage and cone beam computed tomography scans. The proportion of treatment fractions with a shift difference exceeding the planning target volume of 7 mm, between orthogonal kilovoltage and cone beam computed tomography scans, was calculated.

Results:

The mean vertical, lateral, and longitudinal shifts resulted from 2D match between orthogonal kilovoltage images and corresponding digitally reconstructed radiographs were 0.353 cm (interquartile range: 0.1-0.5), 0.346 cm (interquartile range: 0.1-0.5), and 0.289 cm (interquartile range: 0.1-0.4), compared to 0.388 cm (interquartile range: 0.1-0.5), 0.342 cm (interquartile range: 0.1-0.5), and 0.291 cm (interquartile range: 0.1-0.4) obtained from 3D match between cone beam computed tomography and planning computed tomography scan, respectively. Our results show a significant difference between the kilovoltage and cone beam computed tomography shifts in the anterior–posterior direction (P = .01). The proportion of treatment fractions in which the differences in kilovoltage and cone beam computed tomography shifts between exceeded the 7 mm planning target volume margin was 6%, 2%, and 3% in the anterior–posterior, lateral, and superior–inferior directions, respectively.

Conclusion:

We prospectively demonstrated that the daily use of volumetric cone beam computed tomography for treatment localization in post-radical prostatectomy patients demonstrated an increased need for a shift in patient position. This suggests that in post-radical prostatectomy patients the daily cone beam computed tomography imaging improved localization of the prostate bed and may have prevented a limited number of geographic misses, compared to daily kilovoltage imaging that was not assisted with fiducials.

Post-Prostatectomy Image-Guided Radiotherapy: The Invisible Target Concept

In the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) appears crucial to control dose delivery and to promote dose escalation while allowing healthy tissue sparing. The place of IGRT following radical prostatectomy is poorly described in the literature. This review aims to highlight some key points on the different IGRT techniques applicable to prostatic bed radiotherapy. Furthermore, methods used to evaluate target motion and to reduce planning target volume margins will also be explored.

Rationale and development of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy post-prostatectomy: the present standard of care?

The indications for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy have evolved over the last decade, although the optimal timing, dose, and target volume remain to be well defined. The target volume is susceptible to anatomical variations with its borders interfacing with the rectum and bladder. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become the gold standard for radical prostate radiotherapy. Here we review the current evidence for image-guided techniques with intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the prostate bed and describe current strategies to reduce or account for interfraction and intrafraction motion.

Superior target volume and organ stability with the use of endorectal balloons in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the endorectal balloon (ERB) as a method to improve post-prostatectomy clinical target volume (CTV) stability.

METHODS

Seventy cone-beam CT (CBCT) obtained during radiotherapy treatment from seven patients treated with an ERB and 68 CBCT from seven patients treated without an ERB were contoured according to published guidelines. CTV was subdivided into superior and inferior CTV; whole rectal volume was subdivided into superior and inferior rectum and anal volume. Concordance index (CI) of CBCT treatment volumes compared with planning volumes was calculated and displacements were measured.

RESULTS

Whole rectal, superior and inferior rectum and anal CI were significantly improved with the ERB by 21%, 17%, 26% and 17% respectively (P < 0.0001). Overall CTV and inferior CTV CI was improved by 4% with the ERB (overall CTV P = 0.021; Inferior CTV P < 0.0001). In the ERB cohort, average displacement for superior CTV was 0.37 cm anterior-posterior (AP) and 0.10 cm left-right (LR). Average standard deviation was 0.27 cm AP and 0.11 cm LR. Inferior CTV average displacement was 0.11 cm AP and 0.02 cm LR. Average standard deviation was 0.11 cm AP and 0.02 cm LR. In the non-ERB cohort, average displacement for superior CTV was 0.43 cm AP and 0.10 mm left-right (LR). Average standard deviation was 0.45 cm AP and 0.13 cm LR. Inferior CTV average displacement was 0.16 cm AP and 0.01 cm LR. Average standard deviation was 0.17 cm AP and 0.03 cm LR. There was no statistically significant impact of bladder filling on CTV CI in ERB patients (P = 0.551) as opposed to non-ERB patients (P = 0.0421).

CONCLUSION

ERBs in the post-prostatectomy setting resulted in increased rectal and CTV stability while negating the effects of bladder filling on CTV stability.

Prostate bed radiation therapy: the utility of ultrasound volumetric imaging of the bladder

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of incorporating daily ultrasound scanning to reduce variation in bladder filling before prostate bed radiotherapy. The primary aim was to confirm that coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) with the 95% isodose was within tolerance when the ultrasound-determined bladder volume was within individualised patient limits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were acquired on 10 occasions during the course of treatment to assess systematic changes in rectal or bladder volume as part of a standard offline image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) protocol. In addition, through a two-part study an ultrasound scan of the bladder was added to the IGRT protocol. In the Part 1 study, the ultrasound-determined bladder volume at the time of treatment simulation in 26 patients was compared with the simulation computed tomography cranio-caudal bladder length. The relationship between the two was used to establish bladder volume tolerance limits for the interventional component of the Part 2 study. In the Part 2 study, 24 patients underwent ultrasound scanning before treatment. When bladder volumes were outside the specified limits, they were asked to drink more water or void as appropriate until the volume was within tolerance.

RESULTS

Based on the results of the Part 1 study, a 100 ml tolerance was applied in the Part 2 study. Seventy-six per cent of patients found to have bladder volumes outside tolerance were able to satisfactorily adjust their bladder volumes on demand. Comparing the bladder volumes with the CBCT data revealed that the bladder scanner correctly predicted that the target volume would be accurately targeted (using surrogate end points) in 83% of treatment fractions.

CONCLUSION

A simple hand-held ultrasound bladder scanner provides a practical, inexpensive, online solution to confirming that the bladder volume is within acceptable, patient-specific limits before treatment delivery, with the potential to improve overall treatment accuracy.

Dosimetric effect of online image-guided anatomical interventions for postprostatectomy cancer patients

PURPOSE

To assess daily variations in delivered doses in postprostatectomy patients, using kilovoltage cone-beam CT (CBCT) datasets acquired before and after interventions to correct for observed distortions in volume/shape of rectum and bladder.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen consecutive patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the prostate bed were studied. For patients with large anatomical variations, quantified by either a rectal wall displacement of >5 mm or bladder volume change of >50% on the CBCT compared with the planning CT, an intervention was performed to adjust the rectum and/or bladder filling. Cumulative doses over the pre- and post-intervention fractions were calculated by tracking the position of the planning CT voxels on different CBCTs using a deformable surface-mapping algorithm. Dose and displacements vectors were projected on two-dimensional maps, the minimal dose received by the highest 95% of the planing target volume (PTV D95) and the highest 10% of the rectum volume (D10) as well as the bladder volume receiving >2 Gy (V2) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 544 fractions, 96 required intervention. Median (range) number of interventions per patient was 5 (2-12). Compared with the planning values, the mean (SD) pre- vs. postintervention value for PTV D95 was -2% (2%) vs. -1% (2%) (p < 0.12), for rectum D10 was -1% (4%) vs. +1% (4%) (p < 0.24), and for bladder V2 was +6% vs. +20% (p < 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to reduce treatment volume deformations due to bladder and rectum fillings are not necessary when patients receive daily accurate CBCT localization, and the frequency of those potential interventions is low. However, for hypofractionated treatments, the relative frequency can significantly increase, and interventions can become more dosimetrically beneficial.