BIOGUIDE-X: A First-in-Human Study of the Performance of Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Positron emission tomography (PET)-guided radiation therapy is a novel tracked dose delivery modality that uses real-time PET to guide radiation therapy beamlets. The BIOGUIDE-X study was performed with sequential cohorts of participants to (1) identify the fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dose for PET-guided therapy and (2) confirm that the emulated dose distribution was consistent with a physician-approved radiation therapy plan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This prospective study included participants with at least 1 FDG-avid targetable primary or metastatic tumor (2-5 cm) in the lung or bone. For cohort I, a modified 3 + 3 design was used to determine the FDG dose that would result in adequate signal for PET-guided therapy. For cohort II, PET imaging data were collected on the X1 system before the first and last fractions among patients undergoing conventional stereotactic body radiation therapy. PET-guided therapy dose distributions were modeled on the patient's computed tomography anatomy using the collected PET data at each fraction as input to an "emulated delivery" and compared with the physician-approved plan.

RESULTS

Cohort I demonstrated adequate FDG activity in 6 of 6 evaluable participants (100.0%) with the first injected dose level of 15 mCi FDG. In cohort II, 4 patients with lung tumors and 5 with bone tumors were enrolled, and evaluable emulated delivery data points were collected for 17 treatment fractions. Sixteen of the 17 emulated deliveries resulted in dose distributions that were accurate with respect to the approved PET-guided therapy plan. The 17th data point was just below the 95% threshold for accuracy (dose-volume histogram score = 94.6%). All emulated fluences were physically deliverable. No toxicities were attributed to multiple FDG administrations.

CONCLUSIONS

PET-guided therapy is a novel radiation therapy modality in which a radiolabeled tumor can act as its own fiducial for radiation therapy targeting. Emulated therapy dose distributions calculated from continuously acquired real-time PET data were accurate and machine-deliverable in tumors that were 2 to 5 cm in size with adequate FDG signal characteristics.

F-SHARP: a Phase I/II trial of focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for Radiorecurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Intraprostatic local radiorecurrence (LRR) after definitive radiation is being increasingly identified due to the implementation of molecular positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging for the evaluation of biochemical recurrence. Salvage high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy offers a promising local therapy option, with encouraging toxicity and efficacy based on early series. Furthermore, the incorporation of advanced imaging allows for focal HDR to further reduce toxicity to maximise the therapeutic ratio. The objectives of the 'focal salvage HDR brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer in patients treated with prior radiotherapy' (F-SHARP) trial are to determine the acute and late toxicity and efficacy outcomes of focal salvage HDR brachytherapy for LRR prostate cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

The F-SHARP is a multi-institutional two-stage Phase I/II clinical trial of salvage focal HDR brachytherapy for LRR prostate cancer enrolling patients at three centres.

ENDPOINTS

The primary endpoint is the acute radiation-related Grade ≥3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 4.03) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rate, defined as within 3 months of brachytherapy. Secondary endpoints include acute and late CTCAE toxicity, biochemical failure, patterns of clinical progression, disease-specific and overall survival, and health-related quality of life, as measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score and 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite instruments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Key eligibility criteria include: biopsy confirmed LRR prostate adenocarcinoma after prior definitive radiation therapy using any radiotherapeutic modality, no evidence of regional or distant metastasis, and cT1-3a Nx or N0 prostate cancer at initial treatment. All patients will have multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and molecular PET/CT imaging if possible. In Stage 1, seven patients will be accrued. If there are two or more GI or GU Grade ≥3 toxicities, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 17 additional patients will be accrued (total of 24 patients). For Stage 2, the cohort will expand to 62 subjects to study the efficacy outcomes, long-term toxicity profile, quality of life, and compare single- vs multi-fraction HDR. Transcriptomic analysis of recurrence biopsies will be performed to identify potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Bony structure enhanced synthetic CT generation using Dixon sequences for pelvis MR-only radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

MRI-only radiotherapy planning (MROP) is beneficial to patients by avoiding MRI/CT registration errors, simplifying the radiation treatment simulation workflow and reducing exposure to ionizing radiation. MRI is the primary imaging modality for soft tissue delineation. Treatment planning CTs (i.e., CT simulation scan) are redundant if a synthetic CT (sCT) can be generated from the MRI to provide the patient positioning and electron density information. Unsupervised deep learning (DL) models like CycleGAN are widely used in MR-to-sCT conversion, when paired patient CT and MR image datasets are not available for model training. However, compared to supervised DL models, they cannot guarantee anatomic consistency, especially around bone.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to improve the sCT accuracy generated from MRI around bone for MROP.

METHODS

To generate more reliable bony structures on sCT images, we proposed to add bony structure constraints in the unsupervised CycleGAN model's loss function and leverage Dixon constructed fat and in-phase (IP) MR images. Dixon images provide better bone contrast than T2-weighted images as inputs to a modified multi-channel CycleGAN. A private dataset with a total of 31 prostate cancer patients were used for training (20) and testing (11).

RESULTS

We compared model performance with and without bony structure constraints using single- and multi-channel inputs. Among all the models, multi-channel CycleGAN with bony structure constraints had the lowest mean absolute error, both inside the bone and whole body (50.7 and 145.2 HU). This approach also resulted in the highest Dice similarity coefficient (0.88) of all bony structures compared with the planning CT.

CONCLUSION

Modified multi-channel CycleGAN with bony structure constraints, taking Dixon-constructed fat and IP images as inputs, can generate clinically suitable sCT images in both bone and soft tissue. The generated sCT images have the potential to be used for accurate dose calculation and patient positioning in MROP radiation therapy.

The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Since total neoadjuvant treatment achieves almost 30% pathologic complete response, organ preservation has been increasingly debated for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment for patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. Two organ preservation strategies are available: a watch and wait strategy and a local excision strategy including patients with a near clinical complete response. A major issue is the selection of patients according to the initial tumor staging or the response assessment. Despite modern imaging improvement, identifying complete response remains challenging. A better selection could be possible by radiomics analyses, exploiting numerous image features to feed data characterization algorithms. The subsequent step is to include baseline and/or pre-therapeutic MRI, PET-CT, and CT radiomics added to the patients' clinicopathological data, inside machine learning (ML) prediction models, with predictive or prognostic purposes. These models could be further improved by the addition of new biomarkers such as circulating tumor biomarkers, molecular profiling, or pathological immune biomarkers.

Towards Biology-Guided Radiotherapy Planning and Delivery on a Novel O-Ring PET-Linac Platform: Extended Beyond Bone and Lung Lesions

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) with FDG signal collected via an on-board positron emission tomography (PET) system integrated in an O-ring gantry Linac was recently cleared by the FDA for lung and bone lesions. This study aims to determine if BgRT plans, guided via PET signal, are clinically acceptable for FDG-avid lesions in disease sites beyond bone and lung.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Ten patients previously treated for lesions in the liver, head and neck (HN), pancreas, renal and pelvic-abdominal lymph nodes were identified. Diagnostic PET/CT images of these treatment sites were first collected and processed/converted to mimic PET images that are acquired on PET-Linac and would be used to guide the delivery. For BgRT planning, the PTV was generated with 5 mm margin from GTV and a Biology Tracking Zone was generated including the anticipated full range of target motion. BgRT plans, guided by the emulated PET signal, were generated with 46Gy in 3 fractions for liver and 40Gy in 5 fractions for all other sites. BgRT plan deliverability was first assessed by evaluating the Activity Concentration (AC) and Normalized Target Signals (NTS) on converted PET images with the goal to meet NTS >2 (hard constraint) and AC >5kBq/ml (goal). BgRT plan quality was then evaluated with institutional guidelines on PTV coverage, OAR doses, conformity index (CI) and Heterogeneity index (HI).

RESULTS

BgRT plans were successfully generated for 11 target lesions among ten patients. The average diagnostic PET SUV, derived NTS and AC on converted PET images were 12.62, 9.33 and 12.10 kBq/ml, respectively. All images met the NTS constraints, and 8/11 plans met the AC goal for deliverability. All plans met the OAR hard constraints such as max dose on duodenum, small bowel, large bowel and spinal cord. Five of 11 plans had a limiting GI structure that resulted in an expected reduction in PTV coverage with an average PTV V100% = 77.9%, CI of 1.4, HI of 1.36 and max dose of 133.8%. The other 6 of 11 cases met the PTV V100% = 95%, had an average CI of 1.1, HI of 1.28 and Dmax of 127.67%. The estimated average time for BgRT delivery was 17 mins 25 secs. Although these plan parameters are deemed to be clinically acceptable, heterogeneity was detected inside the target region and suboptimal dose fall off was observed in some cases that may be caused by current implementation.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study showed that BgRT plans were generated successfully with emulated PET images on 11 treatment sites covering HN, abdominal and pelvic regions. All plans met NTS constraints and 8 out of 11 met AC goals for deliverability. The plan quality of all BgRT plans were clinically acceptable based on institutional constraints. Further investigations are required to test more patients/sites for BgRT plan feasibility. Dosimetric benefit from margin reduction of BgRT target should also be investigated in future study.

The Importance of Multi-Parametric MRI, PET/CT, and Biopsy for Identifying and Delineating the Extent of Locally Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Analysis of the F-SHARP Clinical Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Up to 50% of clinical recurrences after curative-intent radiation are intraprostatic local radiorecurrences (LRR), with improved detection through the recent incorporation of multi-parametric MRI and PET/CT in workup. Salvage local therapy (SLT) is increasingly being offered, particularly focal SLT to try to reduce toxicity due to prior radiation. Limited data exist on the incremental value of each imaging modality and biopsy in defining LRR. The objective of this study is to compare the findings of MRI, PET/CT and biopsy in patients with LRR prostate cancer, and the impact each modality has on identifying recurrence and defining the extent of prostate involvement.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of 58 patients enrolled on the ongoing F-SHARP phase I/II clinical trial of salvage HDR brachytherapy from 3 institutions who underwent PSMA or fluciclovine PET/CT, MRI, and biopsy prior to enrollment. Recurrent tumor was delineated on each imaging modality and by inclusion of involved regions on biopsy. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the imaging-defined tumor with biopsy findings to assess the congruence between the imaging modalities and generate the percentage of patients with disease involvement on biopsy outside of the image-defined targets.

RESULTS

Initial therapy was conventional/moderately hypofractionated photons in 35 patients, LDR in 13, proton therapy in 7, SBRT in 2, and neutrons in 1. Recurrence Gleason grade groups included 1 (n = 3), 2 (17), 3 (12), 4 (8), 5 (9), and uninterpretable (9). MRI/TRUS sextant + fusion biopsy was performed in 40 patients, TRUS saturation biopsy in 4, and TRUS systematic biopsy in 14. The median number of cores involved and obtained were 6 and 14. The median number of discrete lesions on biopsy in different quadrants of the prostate was 3 (1-6). The median number of discrete lesions seen on MRI was 1 (0-4). MRI did not identity a discrete lesion in 4 patients. The sensitivity of MRI for detection of the LRR was 92.8%. The false negative rate for not detecting the focus of LRR on MRI was 7.2%. 68.4% of patients had biopsy-proven cancer outside of the MRI-defined target. Fluciclovine PET/CT was used in 45 patients, and 13 had PSMA PET/CT. The median number of lesions on PET/CT was 1 (0-2). PET/CT did not identify a discrete lesion in 8 patients. The pooled sensitivity of PET/CT in detecting the focus of LRR was 86.2% (Fluciclovine: 82.2%, PSMA: 100%). PET/CT false negative rate of PET/CT for not detecting the focus of LRR was 13.8% (Fluciclovine: 17.8%, PSMA 0%). 72.41% of patients had biopsy-proven cancer outside of the PET/CT-defined target (Fluciclovine: 77.8%, PSMA: 53.8%).

CONCLUSION

Although mpMRI and PET/CT are valuable tools for identifying LRR and delineating the extent of prostate/SV involvement, a thorough biopsy is mandatory if pursuing focal SLT. Such treatment should optimally be performed on a clinical trial with robust integration of all imaging and histopathologic data.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Glandular Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Glandular metastases including pancreatic and adrenal sites of disease are associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of indolent biology. Adrenal and pancreatic metastases may develop in isolation or involve other organs and are associated with prolonged survival. Glandular metastases can be treated with systemic therapy, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) or surgical resection and the optimal management of these patients is unknown. There is paucity of data on SAbR for RCC glandular metastases. We hypothesize that ablative doses of radiation therapy utilizing SAbR are associated with high rates of local control greater than 90%, with minimal or no acute grade 3 toxicities or higher with this approach. Here, we report local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) rates as well as toxicities related to SAbR for RCC metastases to the pancreatic and adrenal glands.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This IRB-approved, single-institution, retrospective study included patients with RCC metastases to the adrenal glands and pancreas treated with SAbR. Data on patient demographics, functional status, tumor characteristics, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, local and systemic treatments, toxicities, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RECIST 1.1 principals were utilized to determine LC rates and PFS. PFS was determined from the initiation of SAbR to progression (at SAbR-treated or other sites), or death. OS was defined from the start of SAbR to death. Two independent reviewers assessed these measures and analyzed patient electronic health records for toxicities using CTCAE v5 and relatedness scores.

RESULTS

A total of 50 RCC patients were included in this study with 36 adrenal and 20 pancreatic metastases treated with SAbR. Median dose fractionation used was 40 Gray delivered in 5 fractions. Sixteen patients (32%) were treatment naïve with oligometastatic disease, and thirty-four (68%) were oligo-progressive on systemic therapy with 1-3 prior lines of systemic therapy. For treated adrenal metastatic lesions at 1 year, patients demonstrated a 75.3% OS, 46.7% PFS, and LC of 93.3%. For treated pancreatic metastatic lesions at 1 year, patients demonstrated a 100% OS, 48.6% PFS, and LC of 100%. At 1 year, there was an OS of 82.2%, PFS of 48.2%, and LC of 95.9 % in the combined cohort. The percentage of patients experiencing an acute grade 2 or 3 toxicity attributed to adrenal or pancreatic gland SAbR was 7.4%. There were no acute grade >3 toxicities. The percentage of patients experiencing a late grade 2 or 3 toxicity was 9.3%. Median time to late adverse events was 37.4 months.

CONCLUSION

SAbR of RCC metastases to the pancreas and adrenal glands is feasible, safe and appears to be effective. Median PFS and OS in this cohort compared favorably to those reported in historical cohorts and is consistent with indolent disease.

Analysis of the Measured FDG Uptake from the First-in-Human Clinical Trial of Biology-Guided Radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The RefleXion X1 system is a novel linear accelerator equipped with dual 90° PET arcs incorporated into its architecture to capture emissions from tumors and designed to respond by directing the radiation beam towards target. This study reports on the measured FDG uptake from the first in human multi-institutional clinical trial (BIOGUIDE-X) evaluating the performance and safety of the RefleXion X1 PET-LINAC.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A total of nine patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung (5) and bone (4) tumors were enrolled in the Cohort II of this study after screening their pre-study diagnostic PET/CT, acquired up to 60 days prior to enrollment, to ensure their tumor size between 2 to 5 cm and SUVmax >6. After CT simulation, the tumor and OARs were delineated, and patients had a 4-pass Imaging-only (BgRT Modeling) PET/CT acquisition on the X1 system to generate biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) plans. Before the patients' first and last SBRT fractions, they were injected with FDG, and short PET pre-scan (1-pass) was performed on the X1 followed by a long-PET acquisition (4-pass) to emulate the expected BgRT dose distribution without firing beam. Patients were also imaged on a third-party diagnostic PET/CT scanner after the last-fraction X1 scan. This study compares the SUVmax from the screening PET/CT, X1 Imaging-only scan, X1 PET pre-scan and long scan before the first and last-fractions, and final diagnostic PET/CT.

RESULTS

The median time from injection to PET imaging was 84 ± 15.4 mins for X1 Imaging-only (used for generating BgRT plans), 77 ± 21.6 mins for X1 pre-scan (safety check before treatment start), 108+/- 22 mins for X1 long-PET (used to emulate treatment delivery), and 161 ± 23 mins for final diagnostic PET. For a nominal 10 mCi injection, the mean SUVmax for screening imaging performed on the diagnostic PET/CT was 10.8 ± 4.3. For a 15 mCi nominal injection, the mean SUVmax calculated on the X1 was 5.3 ± 2.6, 5.4 ± 2.0, 5.5 ± 2.6, 5.2 ± 1.8 and 5.4 ± 2.2 for the Imaging-only, first-fraction PET pre-scan, first-fraction long PET scan, last-fraction PET pre-scan, and last-fraction long PET scan, respectively. The overall median SUVmax for all patients across all timepoints and scans with X1 was calculated to be 4.8 with a range of 2.4 to 9.8. The median SUVmax for the diagnostic PET/CT scan after the last fraction X1 scan was 15.8 with a range of 8.5 to 27.7.

CONCLUSION

The dual PET arcs and limited axial extent of the X1 PET subsystem results in lower system sensitivity in comparison to diagnostic PET scanners equipped with full ring and larger axial extent, as expected. With the same FDG injection, the RefleXion X1 produced SUVmax values that were 30.4 % of the diagnostic PET/CT scanners' values. Nevertheless, the X1 collected sufficient emission data to enable successful completion of emulated BgRT deliveries that met dose accuracy criteria in a clinical setting.

Workflow Considerations for Biology-Guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) Implementation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) is a novel platform that combines real-time PET imaging with a 6MV Linac to target tumors. The performance and safety of BgRT was assessed in the BIOGUIDE-X clinical trial. This study aims to report on the BgRT workflow steps and assess the time required for each step of the BgRT process during this trial.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A total of nine patients were enrolled in the second Cohort of the BIOGUIDE-X study which included patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumors (5) and bone tumors (4). The pre-treatment BgRT workflow includes CT simulation, contouring, imaging-only (BgRT Modeling) PET acquisition, BgRT planning, patient specific QA and plan approval. The imaging-only PET acquisition on the X1 collects a representative PET volumetric 3D image and is an input to develop the BgRT treatment plan. The steps during the BgRT delivery session are kVCT localization, PET pre-scan, PET evaluation and BgRT delivery. The PET PreScan is a 1-pass short-duration PET acquisition that is used to confirm that the PET biodistribution on the day of treatment is consistent with that of the imaging-only PET. During BIOGUIDE-X, the BgRT delivery step was replaced by a 4-pass long-PET acquisition that was used to emulate the expected BgRT dose distribution without turning the beam on. To assess BgRT workflow, times from 18F-FDG injection to image-only PET acquisition, 18F-FDG injection to PET pre-scan, Pre-scan to PET evaluation, and PET evaluation to BgRT delivery (long PET acquisition) were recorded.

RESULTS

Time between the 18F-FDG injection and the X1 imaging-only PET scan was 84 ± 19 minutes which includes time for 18F-FDG update. Average time to perform imaging-only PET scan was 26 ± 4 minutes. During the BgRT 'delivery' session, the mean time between the kVCT acquisition and PET pre-scan acquisition was 7 ± 3 minutes. The mean time to acquire a 1-pass PET pre-scan was 6 ± 1 then followed by 6 ± 1 minutes for the PET pre-scan dose calculation to estimate the BgRT doses that it would have delivered for this fraction. On average, the PET reconstruction, the PET signal localization verification and the evaluation of safety metrics took 11 ± 4 minutes. The mean time for BgRT 'delivery' was 27 ± 5 minutes based on the 4-pass long PET acquisition. Time from the start of the BgRT session to the end of the BgRT 'delivery' with this version of the investigative product release was 65 ± 9 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The new processes introduced by the BgRT technology were evaluated and found clinically feasible. Improvements are being undertaken to shorten the time required for each step and to increase patient comfort ahead of BgRT clinical implementation.

Organ sparing treatment for penile cancer using a 3D-printed high-dose-rate brachytherapy applicator

PURPOSE

We present a case study of the treatment of localized squamous cell carcinoma on the glans penis with a custom-fabricated high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy applicator.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A cylindrically shaped applicator was fabricated with eight embedded channels suitable for standard plastic brachytherapy catheters. An additional custom silicone bolus/sleeve was designed to be used with the 3D-printed applicator to provide an additional offset from the source to skin to reduce the surface dose and for patient comfort.

RESULTS

The patient (recurrent cT1a penile cancer) underwent CT simulation, and the brachytherapy plan was created with a nominal prescription dose of 40 Gy in 10 fractions given bidaily to the surface, and 35 Gy at 5 mm depth. Dose coverage to the clinical target volume was 94% (D90). Most fractions were treated with only 5-10 min of setup time. Follow up visits up to 1 year showed no evidence of disease with no significant changes in urinary and sexual function and limited cosmetic detriment to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific organ-sparing HDR plesiotherapy using 3D printing technology can provide reliable and reproducible patient setup and may be effective in achieving disease control for superficial penile cancer, although preserving patient quality of life.

Phase 2 Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients with Primary Renal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Most renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are localized and managed by active surveillance, surgery, or minimally invasive techniques. Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) may provide an innovative non-invasive alternative although prospective data are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether SAbR is effective in the management of primary RCCs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with biopsy-confirmed radiographically enlarging primary RCC (≤5 cm) were enrolled. SAbR was delivered in either three (12 Gy) or five (8 Gy) fractions.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was local control (LC) defined as a reduction in tumor growth rate (compared with a benchmark of 4 mm/yr on active surveillance) and pathologic evidence of tumor response at 1 yr. Secondary endpoints included LC by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), safety, and preservation of kidney function. Exploratory tumor cell-enriched spatial protein and gene expression analysis were conducted on pre- and post-treatment biopsy samples.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Target accrual was reached with the enrollment of 16 ethnically diverse patients. Radiographic LC at 1 yr was observed in 94% of patients (15/16; 95% confidence interval: 70, 100), and this was accompanied by pathologic evidence of tumor response (hyalinization, necrosis, and reduced tumor cellularity) in all patients. By RECIST, 100% of the sites remained without progression at 1 yr. The median pretreatment growth rate was 0.8 cm/yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.3, 1.4), and the median post-treatment growth rate was 0.0 cm/yr (IQR: -0.4, 0.1, p < 0.002). Tumor cell viability decreased from 4.6% to 0.7% at 1 yr (p = 0.004). With a median follow-up of 36 mo for censored patients, the disease control rate was 94%. SAbR was well tolerated with no grade ≥2 (acute or late) toxicities. The average glomerular filtration rate declined from a baseline of 65.6 to 55.4 ml/min at 1 yr (p = 0.003). Spatial protein and gene expression analyses were consistent with the induction of cellular senescence by radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical trial adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that SAbR is effective for primary RCC supporting its evaluation in comparative phase 3 clinical trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this clinical trial, we investigated a noninvasive treatment option of stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of primary kidney cancer and found that it was safe and effective.

Evaluation of fan-beam kilovoltage computed tomography image quality on a novel biological-guided radiotherapy platform

Background and Purpose

A recently developed biology-guided radiotherapy platform, equipped with positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), provides both anatomical and functional image guidance for radiotherapy. This study aimed to characterize performance of the kilovoltage CT (kVCT) system on this platform using standard quality metrics measured on phantom and patient images, using CT simulator images as reference.

Materials and Methods

Image quality metrics, including spatial resolution/modular transfer function (MTF), slice sensitivity profile (SSP), noise performance and image uniformity, contrast-noise ratio (CNR) and low-contrast resolution, geometric accuracy, and CT number (HU) accuracy, were evaluated on phantom images. Patient images were evaluated mainly qualitatively.

Results

On phantom images the MTF_10% is about 0.68 lp/mm for kVCT in PET/CT Linac. The SSP agreed with nominal slice thickness within 0.7 mm. The diameter of the smallest visible target (1% contrast) is about 5 mm using medium dose mode. The image uniformity is within 2.0 HU. The geometric accuracy tests passed within 0.5 mm. Relative to CT simulator images, the noise is generally higher and the CNR is lower in PET/CT Linac kVCT images. The CT number accuracy is comparable between the two systems with maximum deviation from the phantom manufacturer range within 25 HU. On patient images, higher spatial resolution and image noise are observed on PET/CT Linac kVCT images.

Conclusions

Major image quality metrics of the PET/CT Linac kVCT were within vendor-recommended tolerances. Better spatial resolution but higher noise and better/comparable low contrast visibility were observed as compared to a CT simulator when images were acquired with clinical protocols.

Preliminary Evaluation of PTV Margins for Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of the Prostatic Fossa

PURPOSE

In modern trials, traditional planning target volume (PTV) margins for postoperative prostate radiation therapy have been large (7-10 mm) to account for both daily changes in patient positioning and target deformation. With daily adaptive radiation therapy, these interfractional changes could be minimized, potentially reducing the margins required for treatment and improving adjacent normal-tissue dosimetry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted from March 2021 to November 2021. Patients receiving conventionally fractionated postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for prostate cancer with pretreatment and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging (pre-CBCT and post-CBCT, respectively) were included (248 paired images). Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical target volumes (pre-CTVs and post-CTVs) were contoured by a single observer on all CBCTs and verified by a second observer. Motion was calculated from pre-CTV to that of the post-CTV, and predicted margins were calculated with van Herk's formula. Adequate coverage of the proposed planning target volume (PTV) margin expansions (pre-PTV) were verified by determining overlap with post-CTV. In a smaller cohort (25 paired images), dosimetric changes with the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional plans in the Ethos emulator environment.

RESULTS

The estimated margins predicted to achieve ≥95% CTV coverage for 90% of the population were 1.6 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.2 mm (x-, y-, and z -xes, respectively), with 95% of the absolute region of interest displacement being within 1.9 mm, 2.8 mm, and 2.1 mm. After symmetrically expanding all pre-CTVs by 3 mm, the percentage of paired images achieving ≥95% CTV coverage was 97.1%. When comparing adaptive plans (3-mm margins) with scheduled plans (7-mm margins), rectum dosimetry significantly improved, with an average relative reduction in V40Gy[cc] of 59.2% and V65Gy[cc] of 79.5% (where V40Gy and V65Gy are defined as the volumes receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy or higher dose, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Online daily adaptive radiation therapy could significantly decrease PTV margins for prostatic PORT and improve rectal dosimetry, with a symmetrical expansion of 3 mm achieving excellent coverage in this cohort. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective cohort.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Systemic Therapy-naïve Oligometastatic Kidney Cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines for the management of systemic therapy-naïve oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) to provide longitudinal disease control while preserving quality of life (QOL) in patients with systemic therapy-naïve oligometastatic RCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

RCC patients with three or fewer extracranial metastases were eligible. SAbR was administered longitudinally to all upfront and, as applicable, subsequent metastases.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

This prospective phase II single-arm trial was powered to achieve a primary objective of freedom from systemic therapy for >1 yr in >60% of patients (using the Clopper and Pearson methodology). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from first SAbR to progression not amenable to SAbR (local failure at SAbR-treated sites, new metastases not amenable to SAbR, more than three new metastases, or brain metastases); patient-reported QOL metrics; local control (LC) rates; toxicity; cancer-specific survival (CSS); and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twenty-three patients received SAbR to 33 initial and 57 total sites. The median follow-up was 21.7 mo (interquartile range 16.3-30.3). Exceeding the prespecified 60% benchmark, freedom from systemic therapy at 1 yr was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.5, 97.8). One-year PFS was 82.6% (95% CI: 60.1, 93.1). QOL was largely unaffected. LC was 100%. There were no grade 3/4 toxicities, but there was one death due to immune-related colitis 3 mo after SAbR while on subsequent checkpoint inhibitor therapy, where a SAbR contribution could not be excluded. One-year OS was 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9, 99.4); one-year CSS was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

SAbR for oligometastatic RCC was associated with meaningful longitudinal disease control while preserving QOL. These data support further evaluation of SAbR for systemic therapy-naïve oligometastatic RCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Sequential stereotactic radiation therapy can safely and effectively control metastatic kidney cancer with limited spread for over a year without compromising patients' quality of life.

Clinical applications of high dose rate endorectal brachytherapy for patients with rectal cancer

With the establishment of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer, local recurrence rates have significantly decreased. The addition of preoperative external beam irradiation further reduces this risk to less than 6%. As the local treatment becomes successful and more widely used, the associated treatment-related toxicity is becoming clinically important. If 4 to 6% of the patients are to benefit from neo-adjuvant therapy before total mesorectal excision, the acute and the long-term toxicity burden must be reasonable. With the introduction of better-quality imaging for tumour visualization and treatment planning, a new-targeted radiation treatment was introduced with high dose rate endorectal brachytherapy. The treatment concept was tested in phase I and II studies first in the preoperative setting, then as a boost after external beam radiation therapy as a dose escalation study to achieve higher tumour local control in a radical treatment setting with no surgery. High dose rate endorectal brachytherapy is safe and effective in achieving high tumour regression rate and was well tolerated. It is presently explored in a phase III dose escalation study in the non-operative management of patients with operable rectal cancer.

Case Report: Adaptive radiotherapy in the radiation salvage of prostate cancer

Adaptive radiotherapy has the potential to reduce margins, improve target coverage, and decrease toxicity to organs at risk (OARs) by optimizing radiation delivery to daily anatomic changes. Salvage for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation remains a challenging clinical scenario given the risks to normal tissue in a setting of re-irradiation. Here, we present a case series of five patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer treated with an adaptive online linear accelerator or a 3-T MR-based linear accelerator to demonstrate excellent target coverage. All patients completed the planned treatment course with acceptable acute toxicities but a short follow-up time does not inform subacute/late toxicities.

Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligoprogressive Metastatic Kidney Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with systemic therapy sometimes progress at limited sites.The best treatment approach for patients with oligoprogression remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the ability of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) to extend ongoing systemic therapy in mRCC patients with oligoprogression.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A single-arm phase II clinical trial was conducted at a university medical center and county hospital, including 20 patients with mRCC on first- to fourth-line systemic therapy with three or fewer sites of progression (including new sites) involving ≤30% of all sites.

INTERVENTION

SAbR to oligoprogressing metastases at outset and longitudinally, while radiated sites remain controlled and overall disease oligoprogressive.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary objective was to extend ongoing systemic therapy by >6 mo in >40% of patients. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twenty patients were enrolled. Upfront and sequential SAbR was administered to a total of 37 sites. The local control rate was 100%. At a median follow-up of 10.4 mo (interquartile range: 5.8-16.4), SAbR extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy by >6 mo in 14 patients (70%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.9-90.1). The median time from SAbR to the onset of new systemic therapy or death was 11.1 mo (95% CI: 4.5-19.3). The median duration of SAbR-aided systemic therapy was 24.4 mo (95% CI: 15.3-42.2). Median overall survival was not reached. One patient developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity possibly related to treatment. There was no significant decline in quality of life. Limitations include nonrandomized design and a small patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

SAbR extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy for patients with oligoprogressive mRCC without undermining quality of life. These data support the evaluation of SAbR for oligoprogressive mRCC in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Patients with metastatic kidney cancer on systemic therapy but progressing at limited sites may benefit from focused radiation to progressive sites. Focused radiation was safe and effective, and extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy.

Dose-Intensified Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Localized Prostate Cancer

Purpose

Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) has been increasingly used in prostate cancer (PCa) given its convenience and cost efficacy. Optimal doses remain poorly defined with limited prospective comparative trials and long-term safety/efficacy data at higher dose levels. We analyzed toxicity and outcomes for SAbR in men with localized PCa at escalated 45 Gy in 5 fractions.

Methods and Materials

This study retrospectively analyzed men from 2015 to 2019 with PCa who received linear-accelerator-based SAbR to 45 Gy in 5 fractions, along with perirectal hydrogel spacer, fiducial placement, and MRI-based planning. Disease control outcomes were calculated from end of treatment. Minimally important difference (MID) assessing patient-reported quality of life was defined as greater than a one-half standard deviation increase in American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score after SAbR.

Results

Two-hundred and forty-nine (249) low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PCa patients with median follow-up of 14.9 months for clinical toxicity were included. Acute urinary grade II toxicity occurred in 20.4% of patients. Acute grade II GI toxicity occurred in 7.3% of patients. For follow-up > 2 years (n = 69), late GU and GI grade ≥III toxicity occurred in 5.8% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. MID was evident in 31.8%, 23.4%, 35.8%, 37.0%, 33.3%, and 26.7% of patients at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. The median follow-up for biochemical recurrence was 22.6 months with biochemical failure-free survival of 100% at 1 year (n = 226) and 98.7% for years 2 (n = 113) and 3 (n = 54).

Conclusions

SAbR for PCa at 45 Gy in 5 fractions shows an encouraging safety profile. Prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to establish this dose regimen as standard of care for PCa.

A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?

Background

Rectal cancer is curable by standard surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). However, there are well known associated long-term bowel and sexual dysfunctions. Non-operative management (NOM) is an emerging treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer. There is evidence supporting dose response for tumor control in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Aims

In the era of modern technologies, Image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy is a means to deliver local radiotherapy boost treatments. We explored its role in a randomized phase II/III trial (NCT03051464) for patients aiming to achieve cure without surgery. Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) free survival at 2 years was the primary endpoint. We now present the interim analysis upon accrual of the first 40 patients.

Methods

In randomized trial, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent 5-FU/ Capecitabine. They were randomized to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A), or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy boosts for a total of 30 Gy in 3 fractions (Arm B).

Results

Forty patients were included (20 per arm). The median age was 66 years; baseline characteristics were well balanced in terms of age, tumor location, T stage and tumor size (Table 1). The acute treatment related toxicities are similar as shown in table 2 but in arm B, there were two deaths: one patient died during his chemotherapy and external beam treatment from congestive heart failure and one patient from a heart attack after treatment prior to salvage TME surgery. The proportion of complete clinical response was 50% (n=10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B (n=18/20). With a median follow-up of 2.2 years, local regrowth at 2 years occurred in 4/10 patients (40%) in Arm A and 4/18 patients (22%) in Arm B. TME-free survival rate at 2 years was 45.9% in Arm A and 85.1% in Arm B (p=0.0036) (Figure 1).

Conclusions

The interim analysis of this trial suggests that these two strategies of radiation dose escalation are feasible and lead to high chances of organ preservation in patients with operable rectal cancer. The Independent Monitoring Comittee (IDMC) approved the continuation of patient recruitment in the phase III study as planned.

Funding Agencies

Elekta

A121 QUANTIFYING INTER-OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE SEGMENTATION OF RECTAL TUMORS IN ENDOSCOPY IMAGES AND ITS EFFECTS ON DEEP LEARNING

Background

Tumor delineation in endoscopy images is a crucial part of clinical diagnoses and treatment planning for rectal cancer patients. However, it is challenging to detect and adequately determine the size of tumors in these images, especially for inexperienced clinicians. This motivates the need for a standardized, automated segmentation method. While deep learning has proven to be a powerful tool for medical image segmentation, it requires a large quantity of high-quality annotated training data. Since the annotation of endoscopy images is prone to high inter-observer variability, creating a robust unbiased deep learning model for this task is challenging.

Aims

To quantify the inter-observer variability in the manual segmentation of tumors in endoscopy images of rectal cancer patients and investigate an automated approach using deep learning.

Methods

Three gastrointestinal physicians and radiation oncologists (G1, G2, and G3) segmented 2833 endoscopy images into tumor and non-tumor regions. The whole image classifications and the pixelwise classifications into tumor and non-tumor were compared to quantify the inter-observer variability. Each manual annotator is from a different institution.

Three different deep learning architectures (FCN32, U-Net, and SegNet) were trained on the binary contours created by G2. This naive approach investigates the effectiveness of neglecting any information about the uncertainty associated with the task of tumor delineation.

Finally, segmentations from G2 and the deep learning models’ predictions were compared against ground truth labels from G1 and G3, and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 scores were computed for images where both segmentations contained tumors.

Results

The deep-learning segmentation took less than 1 second, while manual segmentation took approximately 10 seconds per image. There was significant inter-observer variability for the whole-image classifications made by the manual annotators (Figure 1A). The segmentation scores achieved by the deep learning models (SegNet F1:0.80±0.08) were comparable to the inter-observer variability for the pixel-wise image classification (Figure 1B).

Conclusions

The large inter-observer variability observed in this study indicates a need for an automated segmentation tool for tumors in endoscopy images of rectal cancer patients. While deep learning models trained on a single observer’s labels can segment tumors with an accuracy similar to the inter-observer variability, these models do not accurately reflect the intrinsic uncertainty associated with tumor delineation. In our ongoing studies, we investigate training a model with all observers’ contours to reflect the uncertainty associated with the tumor segmentations.

Funding Agencies

CIHRNSERC

Discordance of patient- and physician-reported toxicities in two prospective trials of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer

245

Background: SBRT for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is the focus of several ongoing and reported high-impact trials, which often focus on physician-reported toxicity (P-Tox) when comparing regimens. Patient-reported quality of life (PR-QoL) may differ and provide a more sensitive comparative metric of treatment burden, especially with fewer provider interactions during SBRT than during protracted RT courses. We evaluated the concordance of prospective genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) P-Tox and PR-QOL in men receiving SBRT for PCa. Methods: Data from two concurrently-enrolled prospective trials of SBRT in high-risk (Phase I Safety Endpoint, NCT01896271) and low-intermediate risk (Phase II GI Toxicity Endpoint, NCT02353832) PCa were used. Matching standardized schedules of collected PR-QoL [Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)] and P-Tox (CTCAE v5.0) were analyzed over the first 18 months of follow up, where symptoms are most pronounced. We assessed concordance of Grade≥2 GU/GI physician reported toxicity with PR-QoL declines exceeding anchor based minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds (-6 urinary and -5 bowel summary scores, respectively) for each patient at each time point. Patients without baseline PR-QoL data were excluded in full, while time points with missing PR-QoL or P-Tox were excluded individually without imputation. Concordance was evaluated by Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results: From 101 patients, there were 256 (64%) follow up observations through 18 months with both PR-QoL and P-Tox at the time point and baseline. Concordance of PR-QoL and P-Tox was low at all time points for both GU and GI toxicity domains (mean kappa 0.093; Table). MCID was more often reported by patients than Grade≥2 toxicity by physicians (38% vs 17% for GU and 44% vs 10% for GI). There was little overlap of PR-QoL and P-Tox reporting: Grade≥2 P-Tox reported in 17% of observations with MCID in PR-QoL, while MCID in PR-QoL reported in 54% of observations of Grade ≥2 P-Tox. Mean concordance was similarly low when analyzing sub-groups of trial, investigator, and an alternative 2xMCID threshold. Conclusions: P-Tox and PR-QoL differed dramatically in two prospective studies of SBRT despite toxicity primary endpoints. This may reflect subjective and varying intervention thresholds driving P-Tox reporting, rather than actual patient burden. These data strongly support use of PR-QoL rather than P-Tox for SBRT comparative study endpoints and guidelines in this rapidly evolving space. [Table: see text]

PSA-Net: Deep learning-based physician style-aware segmentation network for postoperative prostate cancer clinical target volumes

PURPOSE

Automatic segmentation of medical images with deep learning (DL) algorithms has proven highly successful in recent times. With most of these automation networks, inter-observer variation is an acknowledged problem that leads to suboptimal results. This problem is even more significant in segmenting postoperative clinical target volumes (CTV) because they lack a macroscopic visible tumor in the image. This study, using postoperative prostate CTV segmentation as the test case, tries to determine 1) whether physician styles are consistent and learnable, 2) whether physician style affects treatment outcome and toxicity, and 3) how to explicitly deal with different physician styles in DL-assisted CTV segmentation to facilitate its clinical acceptance.

METHODS

A dataset of 373 postoperative prostate cancer patients from UT Southwestern Medical Center was used for this study. We used another 83 patients from Mayo Clinic to validate the developed model and its adaptability. To determine whether physician styles are consistent and learnable, we trained a 3D convolutional neural network classifier to identify which physician had contoured a CTV from just the contour and the corresponding CT scan. Next, we evaluated whether adapting automatic segmentation to specific physician styles would be clinically feasible based on a lack of difference between outcomes. Here, biochemical progression-free survival (BCFS) and grade 3+ genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between physician styles with the log rank test and subsequently with a multivariate Cox regression. When we found no statistically significant differences in outcome or toxicity between contouring styles, we proposed a concept called physician style-aware (PSA) segmentation by developing an encoder-multidecoder network with perceptual loss to model different physician styles of CTV segmentation.

RESULTS

The classification network captured the different physician styles with 87% accuracy. Subsequent outcome analysis showed no differences in BCFS and grade 3+ toxicity among physicians. With the proposed physician style-aware network (PSA-Net), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) accuracy for all physicians was 3.4% higher on average than with a general model that does not differentiate physician styles. We show that these stylistic contouring variations also exist between institutions that follow the same segmentation guidelines, and we show the proposed method's effectiveness in adapting to new institutional styles. We observed an accuracy improvement of 5% in terms of DSC when adapting to the style of a separate institution.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the classification network established that physician styles are learnable, and the lack of difference between outcomes among physicians shows that the network can feasibly adapt to different styles in the clinic. Therefore, we developed a novel PSA-Net model that can produce contours specific to the treating physician, thus improving segmentation accuracy and avoiding the need to train multiple models to achieve different style segmentations. We successfully validated this model on data from a separate institution, thus supporting the model's generalizability to diverse datasets.

SAbR for High-Risk Prostate Cancer-A Prospective Multilevel MRI-Based Dose Escalation Trial

PURPOSE

Radiation dose intensification improves outcome in men with high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa). A prospective trial was conducted to determine safety, feasibility, and maximal tolerated dose of multilevel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based 5-fraction SAbR in patients with HR-PCa.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This phase I clinical trial enrolled patients with HR-PCa with grade group ≥4, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥20 ng/mL, or radiographic ≥T3, and well-defined prostatic lesions on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) into 4 dose-escalation cohorts. The initial cohort received 47.5 Gy to the prostate, 50 Gy to mpMRI-defined intraprostatic lesion(s), and 22.5 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes in 5 fractions. Radiation doses were escalated for pelvic nodes to 25 Gy and mpMRI lesion(s) to 52.5 Gy and then 55 Gy. Escalation was performed sequentially according to rule-based trial design with 7 to 15 patients per cohort and a 90-day observation period. All men received peri-rectal hydrogel spacer, intraprostatic fiducial placement, and 2 years of androgen deprivation. The primary endpoint was maximal tolerated dose according to a 90-day acute dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate <33%. DLT was defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events ≥grade 3 treatment-related toxicity. Secondary outcomes included acute and delayed gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicity graded with Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of the 62 enrolled patients were included in the analysis. Dose was escalated through all 4 cohorts without observing any DLTs. Median overall follow-up was 18 months, with a median follow-up of 42, 24, 12, and 7.5 months for cohorts 1 to 4 respectively. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were 25% and 20%, while GI were 13% and 7%, respectively. Late grade 3 GU and GI toxicities were 2% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SAbR dose for HR-PCa was safely escalated with multilevel dose painting of 47.5 Gy to prostate, 55 Gy to mpMRI-defined intraprostatic lesions, and 25 Gy to pelvic nodal region in 5 fractions. Longer and ongoing follow-up will be required to assess late toxicity.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Oligoprogression, defined as limited sites of progression on systemic therapy, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is not uncommon, possibly because of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. We evaluated the effect of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SAbR) for longitudinal control of oligoprogressive mRCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with extracranial mRCC were included in this retrospective analysis if they progressed in ≤3 sites on systemic therapy while demonstrating response/stability at other sites and received SAbR to all progressing sites without switching systemic therapy. Our primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival (mPFS), which we calculated from the start of SAbR to the start of a subsequent systemic therapy, death, or loss to follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 36 patients with a median follow-up of 20.4 months (interquartile range, 10.9-29.4). Forty-three sites were treated with SAbR with a median dose of 36 Gy (range, 18-50) in 3 fractions (range, 1-5). Median time to SAbR from the start of systemic therapy was 11.4 months (interquartile range, 6.1-17.1). Median mPFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-13.2). Patients receiving SAbR while on immunotherapy exhibited a longer median mPFS (>28.4 months, log-rank P = .0001) than patients not on immunotherapy (9.2 months). Median overall survival from SAbR administration was 43.4 months (95% CI, 21.5-not Reached). The 1-year local control rate was 93% (95% CI, 78.7-97.5). Most SAbR-related toxicities were grade 1 to 2 (33% of patients), with one grade 5 hemoptysis event possibly related to SAbR or disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

SAbR has the potential to extend the the duration of current systemic therapy for selected patients with mRCC, preserving subsequent therapies for later administration possibly enabling longer treatment duration.

Hydrogel Spacer Rectal Wall Infiltration Associated With Severe Rectal Injury and Related Complications After Dose Intensified Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy

The risk of rectal toxicity during and after prostate cancer radiation therapy is common to all treatment regimens. Hydrogel rectal spacers are increasingly being used to mitigate this risk and to facilitate dose-escalation, but also may infiltrate the rectal wall, with unclear clinical implication. We present a case of significant infiltration associated with severe late rectal injury (grade 4) and further grade 3 to 4 sequelae (recto-urethral fistula and associated osteomyelitis requiring exenteration) after high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. The injury's temporal pattern associated with the expected timing of gel dissolution and displacement of infiltrated rectal layers potentially toward high dose regions together suggest a contributing role of the infiltration to the injury. In light of the rapid increase of hydrogel rectal spacer utilization, we review the case's evolution, concerning imaging findings, and associated literature and make suggestions regarding treatment planning and endoscopic assessment in the setting of infiltration or expected injury.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation (SAbR) for Oligometastatic RCC

A significant proportion of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients present with oligometastatic disease. Retrospective and limited prospective data suggests that a subgroup of patients with oligometastatic mRCC benefits from aggressive local therapy. With the emerging data of high local control efficacy with low toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) for both CNS and extra-cranial mRCC, SAbR may play a critical role in the multi-modality management of mRCC patients with oligometastatic disease. In addition to local control benefit, the benefit of SAbR in this patient population can range from longitudinal disease control, maintaining quality of life, deferring systemic therapy, immune-modulation and even improving survival. A review of the retrospective data suggests that SAbR benefits oligometastatic mRCC patients with metachronous metastases, and perhaps those with indolent biology. Large prospective trials are indicated to successfully integrate SAbR of oligometastatic mRCC with the available systemic therapies to harness the optimal benefit of SAbR for this patient population.

Metastasis-directed radiation therapy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

PURPOSE

Metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT) may improve oncologic and quality of life outcomes in patients with metastatic cancer, but data on its use in metastatic bladder cancer is severely limited. We sought to review our institutional experience with MDRT in patients with metastatic bladder cancer following radical cystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed records of patients who underwent radical cystectomy and subsequent MDRT at our institution between 2009 and 2020. Baseline demographic and clinical/pathologic factors were collected, as were details of treatment including systemic therapy and MDRT. Cases were categorized by treatment intent as consolidative (intended to prolong survival) and palliative (intended only to relieve symptoms). Response to treatment, survival, and toxicity outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients underwent MDRT following radical cystectomy. MDRT was categorized as consolidative in 40% of cases and palliative in 60%. Toxicity (CTCAE Grade ≥ 2) was reported in 15% of patients, none of which exceeded Grade 3. Most patients undergoing consolidative MDRT were treated with SBRT techniques (76%) and a majority (67%) received concurrent treatment with an immuno-oncology agent. Among patients treated with consolidative intent, 2-year progression-free and overall survival were 19% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MDRT is safe and well-tolerated by a majority of patients. A majority of patients treated with consolidative intent survived ≥ 2 years from treatment.

Phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) for oligoprogressive kidney cancer

4564

Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients on systemic therapy may experience oligoprogression. SAbR has been demonstrated to be safe and is associated with high local control rates in mRCC. In this prospective phase II single arm trial, we investigated SAbR to control oligoprogressive mRCC. Methods: Patients with mRCC who demonstrated response to systemic therapy with subsequent radiographic evidence of three or fewer sites of progression were treated with SAbR to all progressive sites. Systemic therapy was held during SAbR at the discretion of the treating oncologist. Follow-up included radiographic imaging at three-month intervals. Sequential SAbR for continued oligoprogression was allowed. The primary objective was extension of ongoing systemic therapy by >6 months in 40% of the patients. Progression was defined by any of these 3 criteria: (1) local failure at a radiated site; (2) progression ineligible for additional SAbR (>3 sites) or involving >30% of metastasis; or (3) progression as clinically determined by treating physicians. An exact binomial test was used to test the probability of postponing systemic therapy. Secondary endpoints focused on overall survival (OS), local control (LC) rates, toxicity, and health-related quality of life (QOL). Results: The trial completed accrual with enrollment of 20 patients who received SAbR to a total of 36 sites. At enrollment four, twelve, three, and one patients were on first, second, third, and fourth line of systemic therapy, respectively. Eleven were on immunotherapy and nine on a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. Three patients required repeat SAbR to a new site for sequential disease control. At a median follow-up of 8.3 months (interquartile range 3.9 – 15.1), SAbR extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy by >6 months in 12 out of 17 patients (70.6%, 95% CI: 48.9%-92.3%). Thirteen out of 20 patients progressed with a median PFS of 8.7 months (95% CI: 3.2-12.4). Five patients died and the OS did not reach the median. LC was 36/36 (100%). Treatment related grade 1 and grade 2 toxicity was experienced by three and one patient, respectively; no grade 3 toxicities were reported. When compared to baseline, no significant decline in QOL was detected. Conclusions: SAbR extended PFS of ongoing systemic by >6 months in oligoprogressive patients with mRCC. SAbR was safe and did not adversely affect QOL. These data support further evaluation of SAbR for oligoproressive mRCC in a prospective randomized setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03696277.

A deep learning-based framework for segmenting invisible clinical target volumes with estimated uncertainties for post-operative prostate cancer radiotherapy

In post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer, precisely contouring the clinical target volume (CTV) to be irradiated is challenging, because the cancerous prostate gland has been surgically removed, so the CTV encompasses the microscopic spread of tumor cells, which cannot be visualized in clinical images like computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. In current clinical practice, physicians' segment CTVs manually based on their relationship with nearby organs and other clinical information, but this allows large inter-physician variability. Automating post-operative prostate CTV segmentation with traditional image segmentation methods has yielded suboptimal results. We propose using deep learning to accurately segment post-operative prostate CTVs. The model proposed is trained using labels that were clinically approved and used for patient treatment. To segment the CTV, we segment nearby organs first, then use their relationship with the CTV to assist CTV segmentation. To ease the encoding of distance-based features, which are important for learning both the CTV contours' overlap with the surrounding OARs and the distance from their borders, we add distance prediction as an auxiliary task to the CTV network. To make the DL model practical for clinical use, we use Monte Carlo dropout (MCDO) to estimate model uncertainty. Using MCDO, we estimate and visualize the 95% upper and lower confidence bounds for each prediction which informs the physicians of areas that might require correction. The model proposed achieves an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.87 on a holdout test dataset, much better than established methods, such as atlas-based methods (DSC<0.7). The predicted contours agree with physician contours better than medical resident contours do. A reader study showed that the clinical acceptability of the automatically segmented CTV contours is equal to that of approved clinical contours manually drawn by physicians. Our deep learning model can accurately segment CTVs with the help of surrounding organ masks. Because the DL framework can outperform residents, it can be implemented practically in a clinical workflow to generate initial CTV contours or to guide residents in generating these contours for physicians to review and revise. Providing physicians with the 95% confidence bounds could streamline the review process for an efficient clinical workflow as this would enable physicians to concentrate their inspecting and editing efforts on the large uncertain areas.

Phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) for oligometastatic kidney cancer

311

Background: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) is a promising treatment option for selected oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients that can provide longitudinal disease control while preserving quality of life. Retrospective data have shown a local control (LC) rate greater than 90% and longitudinal disease control of over a year without systemic therapy. However, prospective validation of SAbR for oligometastatic RCC is lacking. In this prospective phase II single arm trial, we evaluated the impact of SAbR on freedom from systemic therapy (FFST). Methods: Treatment naïve patients with RCC confirmed by pathology and radiographic evidence of three or fewer extracranial metastases received SAbR with curative intent to all measurable sites of disease. Follow-up included radiographic imaging at three-month intervals to assess disease control. The primary endpoint was FFST defined as time from SAbR to the initiation of systemic therapy. Secondary endpoints included LC, modified progression-free survival (mPFS) (time from first SAbR to progression not amenable to further SAbR), PFS on subsequent systemic therapy, cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), toxicity and health-related quality of life (QOL) indices as measured with EQ-5D-5L and FACT-G. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the QOL indices. Results: The trial completed accrual with the enrollment of 23 patients who received SAbR to a total of 38 sites. At a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range 1.8-16), 1-year FFST was 87% (95% CI: 56%-96%). The 1-year mPFS was 79% (95% CI:49%-93%), while the median mPFS has not yet been reached. Three patients had disease progression at individual time points of 3.5, 4.0, and 12 months. One of these patients developed brain metastases that were controlled with gamma knife radiosurgery without initiating systemic therapy. The LC, CSS, and OS were 100% (38/38), 100% (23/23), and 95% (22/23), respectively. When compared to baseline, no significant decline in QOL was detected. Three patients experienced treatment-related grade 1 toxicity; no ≥grade 2 toxicities were reported. One patient died of an unrelated cause. Conclusions: SAbR is a safe and effective treatment for oligometastatic RCC that can provide longitudinal disease control and preserve quality of life. These data support further evaluation of SAbR for oligometastatic RCC in a randomized study. Clinical trial information: NCT02956798 .

Optimizing treatment sequencing of chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer: The KIR randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies have shown low compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy and external beam radiation (CT/EBRT) with total mesorectal excision. We hypothesize that giving neoadjuvant CT before local treatment would improve CT compliance.

METHODS

Between 2010-2017, 180 patients were randomized (2:1) to either Arm A (AA) with FOLFOX x6 cycles prior to high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and surgery plus adjuvant FOLFOX x6 cycles, or Arm B (AB), with neoadjuvant HDRBT with surgery and adjuvant FOLFOX x12 cycles. The primary endpoint was CT compliance to ≥85% of full-dose CT for the first six cycles. Secondary endpoints were ypT0N0, five-year disease free survival (DFS), local control and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients were randomized to either AA (n = 120, median age (MA) 62 years) or AB (n = 60, MA 63 years). 175/180 patients completed HDRBT as planned (97.2%). In AA, two patients expired during CT; three patients post-randomization received short course EBRT because of progression under CT (n = 2, AA) or personal preference (n = 1, AB). ypT0N0 was 31% in AA and 28% in AB (p = 0.7). CT Compliance was 80% in AA and 53% in AB (p = 0.0002). Acute G3/G4 toxicity was 35.8% in AA and 27.6% in AB (p = 0.23). With a median follow-up of 48.5 months (IQR 33-72), the five-year DFS was 72.3% with AA and 68.3% with AB (p = 0.74), the five-year OS 83.8% for AA and 82.2% for AB (p = 0.53), and the five-year local recurrence was 6.3% for AA and 5.8% for AB (p = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

We confirmed improved compliance to neoadjuvant CT in this study. Although there is no statistical difference in ypT0N0 rate, local recurrence, and DFS between the two arms, a trend towards favourable oncological outcomes is observed.

Safety and outcome of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with rectal hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer

76

Background: Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy delivered using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a cost-effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. Optimal dosing remains unclear, as commonly used 30-40Gy/5fx regimens appear to overestimate hypofractionation’s control benefits. Here, we report the largest experience of 45Gy/5Fx of SBRT for prostate cancer patients treated with hydrogel peri-rectal spacer (‘hydrogel’). Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective protocol was used to conduct a registry search identifying all patients with prostate cancer who received 45Gy/5Fx between 2015-2019 with hydrogel. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were defined using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5.0. The ASTRO-Phoenix failure definition of Nadir+2 ng/mL was used for biochemical failure. Results: We analyzed 250 low (9.2%), intermediate (85.2%), and high-risk (5.6%) prostate cancer patients with a median follow-up of 9.9 months (range: 0-45.7 months). Acute GU and GI grade ≥ II toxicities were noted in 15.2% and 7.2% of patients, respectively. Late GU grade II and III toxicities occurred in 24.0% and 1.2% of patients, respectively, while late GI grade II and III toxicities occurred in 4.0% and 0.4% of patients, respectively. In patients (N=44) with follow-up >2 years, late GU and GI grade III toxicities occurred in 4.55% and 2.27% of patients, respectively. A significant correlation was noted for acute GI and GU toxicity predicting the respective late GI and GU toxicity (p-value < 0.001 for both). Physician-reported Grade ≥ II new onset erectile dysfunction was 17.2%. A gradual decline in prostate-specific antigen with a mean nadir of 0.04 (95% CI: [0.018, 0.067]) at 36 months was noted. The actuarial freedom from biochemical failure was 96.33% at 3 years. Overall survival was 94.09% at 3 years with no deaths attributed to prostate cancer. Conclusions: SBRT treatment of 45Gy/5Fx with hydrogel is well tolerated with GU/GI toxicities comparable to those reported for conventional fractionation. Although short, the 3-year biochemical control rate is encouraging. Longer follow-up and prospective evaluation are warranted.

Prostate oncologic therapy while ensuring neurovascular conservation (POTEN-C): A phase II randomized controlled trial of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SAbR) with or without neurovascular sparing for erectile function preservation in localized prostate cancer

TPS381

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) associated sexual dysfunction occurs in half of men following treatment for localized prostate cancer. Proposed mechanisms include vascular injury of adjacent internal pudendal arteries (IPA), penile bulb (PB), corpora cavernosa (CC) or neurovascular bundles (NVB). Ability to spare these structures has been limited by a presumed need to treat the entire prostate gland, while also preventing rectal injury. Recent innovations have challenged this issue: a) precise dose delivery with stereotactic ablative RT (SAbR), b) improved spatial mapping of clinically significant disease with mpMRI, c) rectal avoidance with rectal spacer use. Methods: POTEN-C is a multi-center phase II randomized control trial, which includes men with a) low-intermediate risk prostate cancer eligible for SAbR without ADT, b) potent by sexual composite score ≥60 on EPIC patient-reported quality of life instrument, c) mpMRI delineated disease (PIRADS v2 score 3-5) ≥5mm to at least one ‘spared’ NVB. After placement of rectal spacer gel and CT/MRI simulation, men are randomized to standard SAbR to 40-45Gy/5fx or neurovascular-sparing SAbR. In the sparing experimental arm, the prostate PTV is given 30Gy/5fx excluding unilateral ‘spared’ NVB, while a 40-45Gy PTV further excludes a 5mm protective shell on the unilateral ‘spared’ NVB+IPA+PB+CC. Centralized rapid review of initial contours/plans and online training materials are integrated. The primary endpoint is 2-year patient-reported potency, measured by EPIC sexual composite score. We hypothesize that neurovascular sparing SAbR will reduce 2-year EPIC score decline from a control of 20 to 10 (corresponding to a MCID). Assuming standard deviation 20, two-sided significance level 0.10 with two-sample t-testing, and 15% attrition, we intend to enroll 120 patients to provide 80% power to detect this difference. Secondary endpoints include sexual medication/aid use, relapse rates, GU/GI toxicity. Enrollment is ongoing. Details: http://www.poten-c.org . Clinical trial information: 03525262.

Image Guided Adaptive Endorectal Brachytherapy in the Nonoperative Management of Patients With Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Organ preservation or nonoperative management of rectal cancer is of growing interest. Image guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy is a radiation dose escalation modality: we explored its role in elderly patients unfit for surgery and patients refusing surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this registry study, patients with rectal cancer who were ineligible for surgery received 40 Gy in 16 fractions of pelvic external beam radiation therapy. They subsequently received 3 weekly image guided adaptive brachytherapy boosts of 10 Gy to the residual tumor, for a total of 30 Gy in 3 fractions. Complete clinical response (cCR) and local control were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

94 patients were included; the median age was 81.1 years. With a median follow-up of 1.9 years, the proportion of cCR was 86.2%, the tumor regrowth proportion was 13.6%, and the cumulative incidence of local relapse was 2.7% at 1 year and 16.8% at 2 years. When considering responders and nonresponders, the 2-year local control was 71.5%. The overall survival at 2 years was 63.6%. Acute rectal grade 1 to 2 toxicity included all patients: 12.8% of patients had late bleeding requiring iron replacement, blood transfusions, or argon plasma therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this registry study, evaluating radiation dose escalation for elderly medically unfit patients with unselected tumors, reveal that a high proportion of patients achieved cCR with a manageable toxicity profile. This technology will likely contribute to the challenging nonoperative management paradigm of rectal cancer.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SAbR) Used to Defer Systemic Therapy in Oligometastatic Renal Cell Cancer

PURPOSE

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) is a promising alternative for selected patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with oligometastasis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of SAbR for longitudinal control in patients with persistently oligometastatic RCC. We report the impact of SAbR on tumor control rates as well as its tolerability in systemic therapy-naïve patients with oligometastatic disease (without brain metastases) and assess the effect of SAbR on subsequent first line systemic therapy by comparison to historical controls.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed patients with metastatic RCC treated with front-line SAbR with a curative intent from 2007 to 2017 at UT Southwestern Kidney Cancer Program. We analyzed local control rates (LCR), toxicity, freedom from systemic therapy (FST), type and duration of first-line systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used.

RESULTS

We identified 47 patients with oligometastatic RCC treated with SAbR to 88 metastases; 11 patients had more than 1 SAbR course. The local control rate was 91.5% at 2 years with no reported grade ≥3 toxicity. With a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range, 13.7-40.9), median FST from first SAbR was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8-40.1). The most common systemic therapies initiated after SAbR were pazopanib (60.7%) and sunitinib (14.3%). The duration of first line systemic therapy appeared unaffected by SAbR. Improved FST was observed in patients with metachronous disease (hazard ratio, 2.67; P = .02), solitary metastasis (HR, 2.26; P = .05), and non-bone metastasis (HR, 2.21; P = .04). One-year and 2-year OS after SAbR were 93.1% (95% CI, 80.1-97.7) and 84.8% (95% CI, 69.1-92.9), respectively. Median OS was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

SAbR is an effective and safe treatment for selected patients with oligometastatic RCC, can provide longitudinal disease control without systemic therapy for over a year, and does not appear to adversely affect the effectiveness of first-line systemic therapy once initiated. Prospective validation of these findings is being sought through a phase 2 trial.

A Comparison of Grade 4 Lymphopenia With Proton Versus Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer

Purpose

Grade 4 lymphopenia (G4L) during radiation therapy (RT) is associated with higher rates of distant metastasis and decreased overall survival in a number of malignancies, including esophageal cancer (EC). Through a reduction in integral radiation dose, proton RT (PRT) may reduce G4L relative to photon RT (XRT). The purpose of this study was to compare G4L in patients with EC undergoing PRT versus XRT.

Methods and materials

Patients receiving curative-intent RT and concurrent chemotherapy for EC were identified. Lymphocyte nadir was defined as the lowest lymphocyte count during RT. G4L was defined as absolute lymphocyte count <200/mm³. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) were performed to assess patient and treatment factors associated with lymphopenia. A propensity-matched (PM) cohort was created using logistic regression, including baseline covariates.

Results

A total of 144 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 66 years (range, 32-85 years). Of these patients, 79 received XRT (27% 3-dimensional chemo-RT and 73% intensity modulated RT) and 65 received PRT (100% pencil-beam scanning). Chemotherapy consisted of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (99%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, except for age (median 4 years older in the PRT cohort). G4L was significantly higher in patients who received XRT versus those who received PRT (56% vs 22%; P < .01). On MVA, XRT (odds ratio [OR]: 5.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-11.18; P < .001) and stage III/IV (OR: 4.54; 95% CI, 1.87-11.00; P < .001) were associated with G4L. PM resulted in 50 PRT and 50 XRT patients. In the PM cohort, G4L occurred in 60% of patients who received XRT versus 24% of patients who received PRT. On MVA, XRT (OR: 5.28; 95% CI, 2.14-12.99; P < .001) and stage III/IV (OR: 3.77; 95% CI, 1.26-11.30; P = .02) were associated with G4L.

Conclusions

XRT was associated with a significantly higher risk of G4L in comparison with PRT. Further work is needed to evaluate a potential association between RT modality and antitumor immunity as well as long-term outcomes.