1
|
Vitzthum LK, Surucu M, Gensheimer MF, Kovalchuk N, Han B, Pham D, Chang D, Shirvani SM, Aksoy D, Maniyedath A, Narayanan M, Da Silva AJ, Mazin S, Feghali KAA, Iyengar P, Dan T, Pompos A, Timmerman R, Öz O, Cai B, Garant A. BIOGUIDE-X: A First-in-Human Study of the Performance of Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1172-1180. [PMID: 38147912 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Positron emission tomography (PET)-guided radiation therapy is a novel tracked dose delivery modality that uses real-time PET to guide radiation therapy beamlets. The BIOGUIDE-X study was performed with sequential cohorts of participants to (1) identify the fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dose for PET-guided therapy and (2) confirm that the emulated dose distribution was consistent with a physician-approved radiation therapy plan. METHODS AND MATERIALS This prospective study included participants with at least 1 FDG-avid targetable primary or metastatic tumor (2-5 cm) in the lung or bone. For cohort I, a modified 3 + 3 design was used to determine the FDG dose that would result in adequate signal for PET-guided therapy. For cohort II, PET imaging data were collected on the X1 system before the first and last fractions among patients undergoing conventional stereotactic body radiation therapy. PET-guided therapy dose distributions were modeled on the patient's computed tomography anatomy using the collected PET data at each fraction as input to an "emulated delivery" and compared with the physician-approved plan. RESULTS Cohort I demonstrated adequate FDG activity in 6 of 6 evaluable participants (100.0%) with the first injected dose level of 15 mCi FDG. In cohort II, 4 patients with lung tumors and 5 with bone tumors were enrolled, and evaluable emulated delivery data points were collected for 17 treatment fractions. Sixteen of the 17 emulated deliveries resulted in dose distributions that were accurate with respect to the approved PET-guided therapy plan. The 17th data point was just below the 95% threshold for accuracy (dose-volume histogram score = 94.6%). All emulated fluences were physically deliverable. No toxicities were attributed to multiple FDG administrations. CONCLUSIONS PET-guided therapy is a novel radiation therapy modality in which a radiolabeled tumor can act as its own fiducial for radiation therapy targeting. Emulated therapy dose distributions calculated from continuously acquired real-time PET data were accurate and machine-deliverable in tumors that were 2 to 5 cm in size with adequate FDG signal characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Michael F Gensheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Nataliya Kovalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Bin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Daniel Pham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Daniel Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Puneeth Iyengar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Tu Dan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Arnold Pompos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Orhan Öz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moghanaki D, Taylor J, Bryant AK, Vitzthum LK, Sebastian N, Gutman D, Burns A, Huang Z, Lewis JA, Spalluto LB, Williams CD, Sullivan DR, Slatore CG, Behera M, Stokes WA. Lung Cancer Survival Trends in the Veterans Health Administration. Clin Lung Cancer 2024:S1525-7304(24)00035-4. [PMID: 38553325 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer survival is improving in the United States. We investigated whether there was a similar trend within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry were analyzed for temporal survival trends using Kaplan-Meier estimates and linear regression. RESULTS A total number of 54,922 Veterans were identified with lung cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. Histologies were classified as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (64.2%), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (12.9%), and 'other' (22.9%). The proportion with stage I increased from 18.1% to 30.4%, while stage IV decreased from 38.9% to 34.6% (both P < .001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) improved for stage I (58.6% to 68.4%, P < .001), stage II (35.5% to 48.4%, P < .001), stage III (18.7% to 29.4%, P < .001), and stage IV (3.4% to 7.8%, P < .001). For NSCLC, the median OS increased from 12 to 21 months (P < .001), and the 3-year OS increased from 24.1% to 38.3% (P < .001). For SCLC, the median OS remained unchanged (8 to 9 months, P = .10), while the 3-year OS increased from 9.1% to 12.3% (P = .014). Compared to White Veterans, Black Veterans with NSCLC had similar OS (P = .81), and those with SCLC had higher OS (P = .003). CONCLUSION Lung cancer survival is improving within the VHA. Compared to White Veterans, Black Veterans had similar or higher survival rates. The observed racial equity in outcomes within a geographically and socioeconomically diverse population warrants further investigation to better understand and replicate this achievement in other healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew Moghanaki
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Radiation Oncology Service, Los Angeles, CA; University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| | | | - Alex K Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Office of Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Nikhil Sebastian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - David Gutman
- Department of Psychiatry, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Decatur, GA; Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Abigail Burns
- Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Decatur, GA
| | - Zhonglu Huang
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jennifer A Lewis
- Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) and Medicine Service, Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Nashville, TN; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Health Care System Geriatric Research, Nashville, TN; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Christina D Williams
- Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Donald R Sullivan
- Division of Pulmonary, Oregon Health and Science University, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Portland, OR; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Christopher G Slatore
- Division of Pulmonary, Oregon Health and Science University, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Portland, OR; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | | | - William A Stokes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hui C, Brown E, Wong S, Das M, Wakelee H, Neal J, Ramchandran K, Myall NJ, Pham D, Xing L, Yang Y, Kovalchuk N, Yuan Y, Lu Y, Xiang M, Chin A, Diehn M, Loo BW, Vitzthum LK. Personalized Accelerated ChEmoRadiation (PACER) for Lung Cancer: Protocol for a Bayesian Optimal Phase I/II Trial. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:186-189. [PMID: 38040540 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior attempts to escalate radiation dose for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not improved survival. Given the high risk for cardiopulmonary toxicity with treatment and heterogenous presentation of locally advanced NSCLC, it is unlikely that a single dose regimen is optimal for all patients. This phase I/II trial aims to evaluate a novel treatment approach where the level of accelerated hypofractionation is determined by the predicted toxicity from dose to organs at risk (OARs). METHODS Patients ≥ 18 years old with lung cancer planned for fractionated radiotherapy to the lung with concurrent chemotherapy will be eligible. Radiation therapy (RT) will be delivered to a total dose of 60 to 66 Gy in 30, 25, or 20 fractions depending on the ability to meet constraints to key organs at risk including the lungs, heart, and esophagus. The primary endpoint is high grade pulmonary, esophageal, or cardiac toxicity. A Bayesian optimized design is used to determine stopping boundaries and evaluate the primary endpoint. CONCLUSION PACER will evaluate the safety and feasibility of personalized accelerated chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Eleanor Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Samantha Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Millie Das
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Heather Wakelee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Joel Neal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | - Daniel Pham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Yong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Ying Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alex Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hui C, Marquez C, Lau B, Das M, Myall NJ, Roy M, Wakelee HA, Neal JW, Kovalchuk N, Chin A, Diehn M, Loo BW, Xiang M, Vitzthum LK. Patient Selection and Outcomes for Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:e92-e100.e4. [PMID: 38065707 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Adoption of hypofractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) with concurrent chemotherapy has been limited by toxicity concerns. We aimed to describe outcomes of patients treated with HART and concurrent chemotherapy and to evaluate dosimetry to organs at risk to guide patient selection. MATERIALS/METHODS We evaluated a retrospective cohort of NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy with HART (>2.2 Gy per fraction) or standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT; 2-2.2 Gy fractions). Dosimetric parameters to key organs at risk were compared, and toxicity, patterns of recurrence and survival were calculated for the cohorts. RESULTS Fifty-three patients treated with HART were compared with 100 patients treated with SFRT. Median dose per fraction for the HART cohort was 2.75 Gy (range 2.4-3 Gy). HART patients had significantly lower doses to the lung, heart, and esophagus due to patient selection. The HART group and had rates of grade 2+ pneumonitis (9.4 vs. 19%, P = .16) and grade 2+ esophagitis (20.8 vs. 45%, P < .01) that compared favorably to SFRT. Cumulative incidence of in-field recurrence trended lower in the HART cohort (7.6% vs. 23.1%, P = .058). Among the HART group, 88.7% (47/53) met the newly proposed lung constraints based on the degree of hypofractionation CONCLUSION: In select patients with favorable dosimetry to organs at risk, definitive HART with concurrent chemotherapy achieved excellent local control with low toxicity. These results are being used to inform a prospective study on the safety and efficacy of HART with concurrent chemotherapy for select NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Cesar Marquez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Brianna Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Millie Das
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Mohana Roy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Joel W Neal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Alex Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hui C, Ewongwo A, Lau B, Fisher G, Delitto D, Poultsides G, Ho QA, Rahimy E, Pollom E, Chang DT, Vitzthum LK. ASO Visual Abstract: Patterns of Recurrence after Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer and the Role for Adjuvant Radiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:817. [PMID: 37875741 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14475-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Agnes Ewongwo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brianna Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - George Fisher
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Delitto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - George Poultsides
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Quoc-Anh Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Elham Rahimy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Erqi Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hui C, Ewongwo A, Lau B, Fisher G, Delitto D, Poultsides G, Ho QA, Rahimy E, Pollom E, Chang DT, Vitzthum LK. Patterns of Recurrence After Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer and the Role for Adjuvant Radiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:413-420. [PMID: 37755563 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14350-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved treatment strategies are needed for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to describe patterns of failure for patients with no or partial response (NR, PR) to preoperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated from 2008 to 2022 with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery with D2 resection. We excluded patients who received radiation. Cumulative incidence of locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastases (DM) were calculated. For patients with recurrent abdominal disease, hypothetical radiation clinical treatment volumes (CTV) were contoured on postoperative scans and compared with patterns of recurrence. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were identified. The most used preoperative chemotherapy was FLOT (38.6%), followed by FOLFOX (30%) and ECF/ECX/EOX (23.3%). Four (6.7%), 40 (66.7%), and 9 patients (15%) had a complete pathologic response (CR), PR, and NR to neoadjuvant therapy, respectively. Among patients without a CR, 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 62.3% (95% CI 48-76.6%) and 51.3% (95% CI 36.9-65.7%), respectively. Three-year cumulative incidence of LRF and DM were 8.4% (95% CI 0.4-16.4%) and 41.0% (95% CI 26.3-55.4%), respectively. Absolute rates of patients having the first site of recurrence encompassed by a postoperative radiation CTV was 2.0% for patients without a CR and 0% for patients with NR. CONCLUSIONS Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with less than a CR to chemotherapy have poor outcomes due to high rates of DM. Adjuvant locoregional therapy such as radiation is unlikely to affect survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Agnes Ewongwo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brianna Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - George Fisher
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Delitto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - George Poultsides
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Quoc-Anh Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Elham Rahimy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Erqi Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hui C, Vitzthum LK. ASO Author Reflections: A Role for Neoadjuvant Radiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8598-8599. [PMID: 37831276 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14403-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wong LY, Kapula N, He H, Guenthart BA, Vitzthum LK, Horst K, Liou DZ, Backhus LM, Lui NS, Berry MF, Shrager JB, Elliott IA. Risk of developing subsequent primary lung cancer after receiving radiation for breast cancer. JTCVS Open 2023; 16:919-928. [PMID: 38204675 PMCID: PMC10775166 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) is integral to breast cancer treatment, especially in the current era that emphasizes breast conservation. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of subsequent primary lung cancer after RT exposure for breast cancer over a time span of 3 decades to quantify this risk over time as modern oncologic treatment continues to evolve. Methods The SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database was queried from 1988 to 2014 for patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Patients who subsequently developed primary lung cancer were identified. Multivariable regression modeling was performed to identify independent factors associated with the development of lung cancer stratified by follow up intervals of 5 to 9 years, 10 to 15 years, and >15 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Results Of the 612,746 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 319,014 (52%) were irradiated. primary lung cancer developed in 5556 patients (1.74%) in the RT group versus 4935 patients (1.68%) in the non-RT group. In a multivariable model stratified by follow-up duration, the overall HR of developing subsequent ipsilateral lung cancer in the RT group was 1.14 (P = .036) after 5 to 9 years of follow-up, 1.28 (P = .002) after 10 to 15 years of follow-up, and 1.30 (P = .014) after >15 years of follow-up. The HR of contralateral lung cancer was not increased at any time interval. Conclusions The increased risk of developing a primary lung cancer secondary to RT exposure for breast cancer is much lower than previously published. Modern RT techniques may have contributed to the improved risk profile, and this updated study is important for counseling and surveillance of breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lye-Yeng Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Ntemena Kapula
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Hao He
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Brandon A. Guenthart
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Lucas K. Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Kathleen Horst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Douglas Z. Liou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Leah M. Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif
| | - Natalie S. Lui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
| | - Mark F. Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif
| | - Joseph B. Shrager
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif
| | - Irmina A. Elliott
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gensheimer MF, Gee H, Shirato H, Taguchi H, Snyder JM, Chin AL, Vitzthum LK, Maxim PG, Wakelee HA, Neal J, Das M, Chang DT, Kidd E, Hancock SL, Shultz DB, Horst KC, Le QT, Wong S, Brown E, Nguyen N, Liang R, Loo BW, Diehn M. Individualized Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors: The iSABR Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1525-1534. [PMID: 37707820 PMCID: PMC10502697 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
Importance Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is used for treating lung tumors but can cause toxic effects, including life-threatening damage to central structures. Retrospective data suggested that small tumors up to 10 cm3 in volume can be well controlled with a biologically effective dose less than 100 Gy. Objective To assess whether individualizing lung SABR dose and fractionation by tumor size, location, and histological characteristics may be associated with local tumor control. Design, Setting, and Participants This nonrandomized controlled trial (the iSABR trial, so named for individualized SABR) was a phase 2 multicenter trial enrolling participants from November 15, 2011, to December 5, 2018, at academic medical centers in the US and Japan. Data were analyzed from December 9, 2020, to May 10, 2023. Patients were enrolled in 3 groups according to cancer type: initial diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition T1-3N0M0 tumor (group 1), a T1-3N0M0 new primary NSCLC with a history of prior NSCLC or multiple NSCLCs (group 2), or lung metastases from NSCLC or another solid tumor (group 3). Intervention Up to 4 tumors were treated with once-daily SABR. The dose ranged from 25 Gy in 1 fraction for peripheral tumors with a volume of 0 to 10 cm3 to 60 Gy in 8 fractions for central tumors with a volume greater than 30 cm3. Main outcome Per-group freedom from local recurrence (same-lobe recurrence) at 1 year, with censoring at time of distant recurrence, death, or loss to follow-up. Results In total, 217 unique patients (median [IQR] age, 72 [64-80] years; 129 [59%] male; 150 [69%] current or former smokers) were enrolled (some multiple times). There were 240 treatment courses: 79 in group 1, 82 in group 2, and 79 in group 3. A total of 285 tumors (211 [74%] peripheral and 74 [26%] central) were treated. The most common dose was 25 Gy in 1 fraction (158 tumors). The median (range) follow-up period was 33 (2-109) months, and the median overall survival was 59 (95% CI, 49-82) months. Freedom from local recurrence at 1 year was 97% (90% CI, 91%-99%) for group 1, 94% (90% CI, 87%-97%) for group 2, and 96% (90% CI, 89%-98%) for group 3. Freedom from local recurrence at 5 years ranged from 83% to 93% in the 3 groups. The proportion of patients with grade 3 to 5 toxic effects was low, at 5% (including a single patient [1%] with grade 5 toxic effects). Conclusions and Relevance The results of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that individualized SABR (iSABR) used to treat lung tumors may allow minimization of treatment dose and is associated with excellent local control. Individualized dosing should be considered for use in future trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01463423.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Gensheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Harriet Gee
- Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - John M Snyder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Alexander L Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Heather A Wakelee
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Joel Neal
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Millie Das
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Elizabeth Kidd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Steven L Hancock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - David B Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen C Horst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Samantha Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Eleanor Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ngan Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Rachel Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lau BC, Wu YF, No HJ, Ko RB, Devine MD, Das MS, Neal JW, Wakelee HA, Ramchandran K, Gensheimer MF, Diehn M, Chin AL, Loo BW, Vitzthum LK. Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Patients Treated With Thoracic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Antiangiogenic Agents. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:922-930. [PMID: 37085030 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Severe pulmonary hemorrhage can occur in patients treated with thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis). There is limited understanding of which patients are at risk for toxicity with the combination of thoracic SABR and VEGFis or how the risk differs over either therapy alone. METHODS We evaluated a prospectively maintained cohort of 690 patients with 818 pulmonary tumors treated with highly conformal SABR. Rates of any-grade and grade 3 plus (G3+) pulmonary hemorrhage were compared between patients treated with or without VEGFi therapy across tumor locations. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with SABR plus VEGFi and a propensity-matched cohort of those treated with VEGFi therapy alone. RESULTS Treatment with VEGFi plus SABR was associated with higher rates of G3+ pulmonary hemorrhage compared with those treated with SABR alone for the overall cohort (3-y incidence: 7.9% versus 0.6%, p < 0.01) and those with central tumors (19.1% versus 3.3%, p = 0.04). When further subdivided, there were significantly higher toxicity rates with VEGFi for the ultracentral (9.0% versus 45.0%, p = 0.044), but not central nonabutting tumors (0.0% versus 1.3%, p = 0.69). There was an increased incidence of G3+ hemorrhage in patients treated with VEGFi plus SABR compared with VEGFi alone (9.6% versus 1.3%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The combination of VEGFi and SABR was associated with an increased risk of high-grade pulmonary hemorrhage over either therapy alone. Low rates of toxicity were observed when excluding patients with SABR to ultracentral tumors and applying highly conformal SABR techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna C Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Yufan F Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Hyunsoo J No
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ryan B Ko
- Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, Michigan
| | - Max D Devine
- University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Millie S Das
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California; Veteran Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Joel W Neal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Heather A Wakelee
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Kavitha Ramchandran
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Michael F Gensheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Alexander L Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wong LY, Liou DZ, Vitzthum LK, Backhus LM, Lui NS, Chang D, Shrager JB, Berry MF. Impact of Delaying Surgery After Chemoradiation on Outcomes for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2212-2223. [PMID: 36572807 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12980-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performing selective esophagectomy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma may spare patients morbidity, but delayed surgery may infer higher risks. This study evaluated the impact of length of time between chemoradiation and esophagectomy on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. METHODS The impact of surgical timing, stratified by surgery performed < 180 and ≥ 180 days from starting radiation, on perioperative outcomes and survival in patients treated with chemoradiation and esophagectomy for cT1N + M0 and cT2-4, any N, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the mid-distal esophagus in the National Cancer Database (2006-2016) was evaluated with logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional-hazards methods, and propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS Median time between starting radiation and esophagectomy in 1641 patients was 93 (IQR 81-114) days. Most patients (96.8%, n = 1589) had surgery within 180 days of starting radiation, while 52 patients (3.2%) had delayed surgery. Black race and clinical T stage were associated with delayed surgery. Rates of pathologic upstaging, downstaging, complete response, and positive margins were not significantly different between the groups. Patients with delayed surgery had increased major morbidity as measured by a composite of length of hospital stay, readmission, and 30-day mortality [42.3% (22/52) vs 22.3% (355/1589), p = 0.001]. However, delayed surgery was not associated with a significant difference in survival in both univariate [5-year survival 32.8% (95% CI 21.1-50.7) vs 47.3% (44.7-50.1), p = 0.19] and multivariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23 (0.85-1.78), p = 0.26]. CONCLUSIONS Delaying surgery longer than 180 days after starting chemoradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with worse perioperative outcomes but not long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lye-Yeng Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Douglas Z Liou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Leah M Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Natalie S Lui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph B Shrager
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mark F Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong LY, Liou DZ, Vitzthum LK, Backhus LM, Lui NS, Chang D, Shrager JB, Berry MF. ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Delaying Surgery After Chemoradiation on Outcomes for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2226. [PMID: 36759429 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13156-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lye-Yeng Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Douglas Z Liou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Leah M Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Natalie S Lui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph B Shrager
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mark F Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hui C, Vitzthum LK, Chang DT, Pollom EL. Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Post-German Rectal Trial Era: Making Sense in the Absence of Consensus. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e54-e60. [PMID: 35803535 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Trimodality therapy per the German Rectal Trial has led to excellent locoregional outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer. Recent efforts have shifted toward improving distant control and health-related quality of life in this disease. To this end, total neoadjuvant therapy has become an increasingly used approach in which most, if not all, chemotherapy is delivered before surgery to improve compliance and to address micrometastases early. To avoid surgical morbidity, a "watch-and-wait" approach, in which total mesorectal excision is deferred, has also been studied for patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation. These 2 concurrent treatment trends have raised many points of uncertainty in what used to be a relatively straightforward neoadjuvant treatment paradigm. We discuss here our approach to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, based on the data we currently have and through shared decision-making with patients to help them select the treatment that best aligns with their preferences and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Qiao EM, Qian AS, Nalawade V, Voora RS, Kotha NV, Vitzthum LK, Murphy JD. Evaluating High-Dimensional Machine Learning Models to Predict Hospital Mortality Among Older Patients With Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100186. [PMID: 35671416 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Older hospitalized cancer patients face high risks of hospital mortality. Improved risk stratification could help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from future interventions, although we lack validated tools to predict in-hospital mortality for patients with cancer. We evaluated the ability of a high-dimensional machine learning prediction model to predict inpatient mortality and compared the performance of this model to existing prediction indices. METHODS We identified patients with cancer older than 75 years from the National Emergency Department Sample between 2016 and 2018. We constructed a high-dimensional predictive model called Cancer Frailty Assessment Tool (cFAST), which used an extreme gradient boosting algorithm to predict in-hospital mortality. cFAST model inputs included patient demographic, hospital variables, and diagnosis codes. Model performance was assessed with an area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curves, with an AUC of 1.0 indicating perfect prediction. We compared model performance to existing indices including the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index, Charlson comorbidity index, and Hospital Frailty Risk Score. RESULTS We identified 2,723,330 weighted emergency department visits among older patients with cancer, of whom 144,653 (5.3%) died in the hospital. Our cFAST model included 240 features and demonstrated an AUC of 0.92. Comparator models including the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index, Charlson comorbidity index, and Hospital Frailty Risk Score achieved AUCs of 0.58, 0.62, and 0.71, respectively. Predictive features of the cFAST model included acute conditions (respiratory failure and shock), chronic conditions (lipidemia and hypertension), patient demographics (age and sex), and cancer and treatment characteristics (metastasis and palliative care). CONCLUSION High-dimensional machine learning models enabled accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality among older patients with cancer, outperforming existing prediction indices. These models show promise in identifying patients at risk of severe adverse outcomes, although additional validation and research studying clinical implementation of these tools is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund M Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Alexander S Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rohith S Voora
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nelson TJ, Thompson CA, Zou J, Kumar A, Sangchan P, Williamson CW, Vitzthum LK, Sharabi AB, Murphy JD, Fakhry CA, Mell LK. Validation of NRG Oncology's prognostic nomograms for oropharyngeal cancer in the Veterans Affairs database. Cancer 2022; 128:1948-1957. [PMID: 35194791 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To test whether nomograms developed by NRG Oncology for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients could be validated in an independent population-based sample. METHODS The authors tested nomograms for estimating progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients from the Veterans Health Administration with previously untreated locoregionally advanced OPSCC, diagnosed between 2008 and 2017, managed with definitive radiotherapy with or without adjuvant systemic therapy. Covariates were age, performance status, p16 status, T/N category, smoking history, education history, weight loss, marital status, and anemia. We used multiple imputation to handle missing data and performed sensitivity analyses on complete cases. Validation was assessed via Cox proportional hazards models, log-rank tests, and c-indexes. RESULTS A total of 4007 patients met inclusion criteria (658 patients had complete data). Median follow-up time was 3.20 years, with 967 progression events and 471 noncancer deaths. Each risk score was associated with poorer outcomes per unit increase (PFS score, hazard ratio [HR], 1.42 [1.37-1.47]; OS score, HR, 1.40 [1.34-1.45]). By risk score quartile, 2-year PFS estimates were 89.2%, 78.5%, 65.8%, and 48.3%; OS estimates were 92.6%, 83.6%, 73.9%, and 51.3%, respectively (P < .01 for all comparisons). C-indices for models of PFS and OS were 0.65 and 0.67, for all patients, respectively (0.69 and 0.73 for complete cases). The nomograms slightly overestimated PFS and OS in the overall cohort but exhibited high agreement in complete cases. CONCLUSIONS NRG nomograms were effective for predicting PFS and OS for patients with OPSCC, supporting their broader applicability in the OPSCC population undergoing definitive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler J Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.,La Jolla Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California.,Veterans Health Administration, San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Caroline A Thompson
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University School of Public Health, San Diego, California
| | - Jingjing Zou
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Veterans Health Administration, San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Prangrawee Sangchan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | - Casey W Williamson
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Veterans Health Administration, San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Andrew B Sharabi
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.,La Jolla Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Veterans Health Administration, San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Carole A Fakhry
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.,La Jolla Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Williamson CW, Nelson T, Thompson CA, Vitzthum LK, Zakeri K, Riviere P, Bryant AK, Sharabi AB, Zou J, Mell LK. Bias Reduction through Analysis of Competing Events (BRACE) Correction to Address Cancer Treatment Selection Bias in Observational Data. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1832-1840. [PMID: 35140122 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer treatments can paradoxically appear to reduce the risk of non-cancer mortality in observational studies, due to residual confounding. Here we introduce a method, Bias Reduction through Analysis of Competing Events (BRACE), to reduce bias in the presence of residual confounding. METHODS BRACE is a novel method for adjusting for bias from residual confounding in proportional hazards models. Using standard simulation methods, we compared BRACE vs. Cox proportional hazards regression in the presence of an unmeasured confounder. We examined estimator distributions, bias, mean squared error (MSE), and coverage probability. We then estimated treatment effects of high vs. low intensity treatments in 36,630 prostate cancer, 4,069 lung cancer, and 7,117 head/neck cancer patients, using the Veterans Affairs database. We analyzed treatment effects on cancer-specific mortality (CSM), non-cancer mortality (NCM), and overall survival (OS), using conventional multivariable Cox and propensity score (adjusted using inverse probability weighting) models, vs. BRACE-adjusted estimates. RESULTS In simulations with residual confounding, BRACE uniformly reduced both bias and MSE. In the absence of bias, BRACE introduced bias toward the null, albeit with lower MSE. BRACE markedly improved coverage probability, but with a tendency toward overcorrection for effective but non-toxic treatments. For each clinical cohort, more intensive treatments were associated with significantly reduced hazards for CSM, NCM, and OS. BRACE attenuated OS estimates, yielding results more consistent with findings from randomized trials and meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS BRACE reduces bias and MSE when residual confounding is present and represents a novel approach to improve treatment effect estimation in non-randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tyler Nelson
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego
| | | | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Paul Riviere
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health System
| | | | - Andrew B Sharabi
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego
| | - Jingjing Zou
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Department of Mathematics, UC San Diego
| | - Loren K Mell
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While opioids represent a cornerstone of cancer pain management, the timing and patterns of opioid use in the cancer population have not been well studied. This study sought to explore longitudinal trends in opioid use among Medicare beneficiaries with nonmetastatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Within a cohort of 16,072 Medicare beneficiaries ≥66 years old diagnosed with nonmetastatic cancer between 2007 and 2013, we determined the likelihood of receiving a short-term (0 to 6 mo postdiagnosis), intermediate-term (6 to 12 mo postdiagnosis), long-term (1 to 2 y postdiagnosis), and high-risk (morphine equivalent dose ≥90 mg/day) opioid prescription after cancer diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient and cancer risk factors associated with these opioid use endpoints. RESULTS During the study period, 74.6% of patients received an opioid prescription, while only 2.66% of patients received a high-risk prescription. Factors associated with use varied somewhat between short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term use, though in general, patients at higher risk of receiving an opioid prescription after their cancer diagnosis were younger, had higher stage disease, lived in regions of higher poverty, and had a history of prior opioid use. Prescriptions for high-risk opioids were associated with individuals living in regions with lower poverty. CONCLUSIONS Temporal trends in opioid use in cancer patients depend on patient, demographic, and tumor characteristics. Overall, understanding these correlations may help physicians better identify patient-specific risks of opioid use and could help better inform future evidence-based, cancer-specific opioid prescription guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Salans
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vitzthum LK, Nalawade V, Riviere P, Marar M, Furnish T, Lin LA, Thompson R, Murphy JD. Impacts of an Opioid Safety Initiative on US Veterans Undergoing Cancer Treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:753-760. [PMID: 35078240 PMCID: PMC9086780 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited research on how the opioid epidemic and consequent risk reduction policies have affected pain management among cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze how the Opioid Safety Initiative (OSI) implemented at the Veterans Health Administration affected opioid prescribing patterns and opioid-related toxicity. METHODS We performed an interrupted time series analysis of 42 064 opioid-naïve patients treated at the Veterans Health Administration for prostate, lung, breast, and colorectal cancer from 2011 to 2016. Segmented regression was used to evaluate the impact of the OSI on the incidence of any new opioid prescriptions, high-risk prescriptions, persistent use, and pain-related emergency department (ED) visits. We compared the cumulative incidence of adverse opioid events including an opioid-related admission or diagnosis of misuse before and after the OSI. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS The incidence of new opioid prescriptions was 26.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.0% to 28.4%) in 2011 and increased to 50.6% (95% CI = 48.3% to 53.0%) by 2013 before OSI implementation (monthly rate of change: +3.3%, 95% CI = 1.3% to 4.2%, P < .001). After the OSI, there was a decrease in the monthly rate of change for new prescriptions (-3.4%, 95% CI = -3.9 to -2.9%, P < .001). The implementation of the OSI was associated with a decrease in the monthly rate of change of concomitant benzodiazepines and opioid prescriptions (-2.5%, 95% CI = -3.2% to -1.8%, P < .001), no statistically significant change in high-dose opioids (-1.2%, 95% CI = -3.2% to 0.9%, P = .26), a decrease in persistent opioid use (-5.7%, 95% CI = -6.8% to -4.7%, P < .001), and an increase in pain-related ED visits (+3.0%, 95% CI = 1.0% to 5.0%, P = .003). The OSI was associated with a decreased incidence of opioid-related admissions (3-year cumulative incidence: 0.9% [95% CI = 0.7% to 1.0%] vs 0.5% [95% CI = 0.4% to 0.6%], P < .001) and no statistically significant change in the incidence of opioid misuse (3-year cumulative incidence: 1.2% [95% CI = 1.0% to 1.3%] vs 1.2% [95% CI = 1.1% to 1.4%], P = .77). CONCLUSIONS The OSI was associated with a relative decline in the rate of new, persistent, and certain high-risk opioid prescribing as well as a slight increase in the rate of pain-related ED visits. Further research on patient-centered outcomes is required to optimize opioid prescribing policies for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Correspondence to: Lucas K. Vitzthum, MD, MAS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305, USA (e-mail: )
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Office of Research and Development, Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul Riviere
- Office of Research and Development, Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mallika Marar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Furnish
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lewei A Lin
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,Addiction Center and Mental Health Innovations, Services and Outcomes Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Reid Thompson
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA,Office of Research and Development, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - James D Murphy
- Office of Research and Development, Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Qiao EM, Voora RS, Nalawade V, Kotha NV, Qian AS, Nelson TJ, Durkin M, Vitzthum LK, Murphy JD, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Evaluating the clinical trends and benefits of low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer patients. Cancer Med 2021; 10:7289-7297. [PMID: 34528761 PMCID: PMC8525167 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite guideline recommendations, utilization of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening remains low. The driving factors behind these low rates and the real‐world effect of LDCT utilization on lung cancer outcomes remain limited. Methods We identified patients diagnosed with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 2015 to 2017 within the Veterans Health Administration. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the influence of LDCT screening on stage at diagnosis. Lead time correction using published LDCT lead times was performed. Cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) was evaluated using Fine–Gray regression with non‐cancer death as a competing risk. A lasso machine learning model identified important predictors for receiving LDCT screening. Results Among 4664 patients, mean age was 67.8 with 58‐month median follow‐up, 95% CI = [7–71], and 118 patients received ≥1 screening LDCT before NSCLC diagnosis. From 2015 to 2017, LDCT screening increased (0.1%–6.6%, mean = 1.3%). Compared with no screening, patients with ≥1 LDCT were more than twice as likely to present with stage I disease at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.16 [95% CI 1.46–3.20]) and less than half as likely to present with stage IV (OR 0.38 [CI 0.21–0.70]). Screened patients had lower risk of CSM even after adjusting for LDCT lead time (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.60 [CI 0.42–0.85]). The machine learning model achieved an area under curve of 0.87 and identified diagnosis year and region as the most important predictors for receiving LDCT. White, non‐Hispanic patients were more likely to receive LDCT screening, whereas minority, older, female, and unemployed patients were less likely. Conclusions Utilization of LDCT screening is increasing, although remains low. Consistent with randomized data, LDCT‐screened patients were diagnosed at earlier stages and had lower CSM. LDCT availability appeared to be the main predictor of utilization. Providing access to more patients, including those in diverse racial and socioeconomic groups, should be a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund M Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Rohith S Voora
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alexander S Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Michael Durkin
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vitzthum LK, Hui C, Pollom EL, Chang DT. Trimodality Versus Bimodality Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma: Commentary on the American Society of Clinical Oncology Practice Guidelines. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:429-433. [PMID: 34353757 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In the recent guideline statement from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, experts reviewed relevant literature and provided treatment recommendations for multimodality treatment approaches. The guidelines recommend either preoperative concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma and either preoperative CRT followed by esophagectomy or definitive CRT for squamous cell carcinoma. Whether radiation can be omitted in patients with adenocarcinoma or whether surgery can be omitted in patients with squamous cell carcinoma is a subject of ongoing debate and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Marar M, Nalawade V, Panjwani N, Riviere P, Furnish T, Lin LA, Thompson RF, Murphy JD, Vitzthum LK. Impact of the VA opioid safety initiative on pain management for cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
102 Background: Limited research exists on how risk reduction policies in response to the opioid epidemic have impacted pain management among cancer patients. This study investigated the impact of the Veteran’s Health Administration (VHA) Opioid Safety Initiative (OSI) on opioid prescribing patterns and opioid-related toxicity among patients undergoing definitive cancer treatment. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 42,064 opioid-naïve patients receiving definitive local therapy for prostate, lung, breast, and colorectal cancer at the VHA from 2011-2016. Interrupted time series analysis with segmented regression was used to evaluate the impact of the OSI, which launched October 2013. The primary outcome was the incidence of new opioid prescriptions with diagnosis or treatment. Secondary outcomes included rates of high daily dose opioid (≥ 100 morphine milligram equivalent) and concomitant benzodiazepine prescriptions. Additional long-term outcomes included persistent opioid use, opioid abuse diagnoses, pain-related ED visits, and opioid-related admissions. Results: Prior to OSI implementation, the incidence of opioid prescriptions among new cancer patients increased from 26.7% (95% CI 25.0 – 28.4) in the first quarter (Q1) of 2011 to 50.6% (95% CI 48.3 – 53.0) in Q3 2013. There was a monthly increase in opioid prescription rate pre-OSI followed by a monthly decrease post-OSI (Table). High-dose opioid prescriptions were rare, and the monthly rate was stable before and after the OSI. Monthly incidence of concomitant benzodiazepine prescriptions was stable pre-OSI and decreased post-OSI. Persistent opioid use increased pre-OSI and decreased post-OSI. Pain-related ED visits had an incidence of 0.8% (95% CI 0.4 – 1.0) in Q1 2011, 0.3% (95% CI 0.1 – 0.6) in Q3 2013, and 1.8% (95% CI 0.9 – 2.7) in Q4 2016, with an increasing monthly rate after the OSI. At three years, the cumulative incidence of opioid abuse was 1.2% for both the pre- and post-OSI groups but opioid-related admissions were greater in the pre-OSI cohort than the post-OSI cohort (0.9% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The OSI was associated with a decrease in new, persistent, and certain high-risk opioid prescribing as well as an increase in pain-related ED visits. Further research on patient-centered outcomes is required to optimize opioid prescribing policies for patients with cancer.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallika Marar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Neil Panjwani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Timothy Furnish
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Lewei A. Lin
- Veteran Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Reid F. Thompson
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR
| | - James Don Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vitzthum LK, Riviere P, Sheridan P, Nalawade V, Deka R, Furnish T, Mell LK, Rose B, Wallace M, Murphy JD. Predicting Persistent Opioid Use, Abuse, and Toxicity Among Cancer Survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 112:720-727. [PMID: 31754696 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although opioids play a critical role in the management of cancer pain, the ongoing opioid epidemic has raised concerns regarding their persistent use and abuse. We lack data-driven tools in oncology to understand the risk of adverse opioid-related outcomes. This project seeks to identify clinical risk factors and create a risk score to help identify patients at risk of persistent opioid use and abuse. METHODS Within a cohort of 106 732 military veteran cancer survivors diagnosed between 2000 and 2015, we determined rates of persistent posttreatment opioid use, diagnoses of opioid abuse or dependence, and admissions for opioid toxicity. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify patient, cancer, and treatment risk factors associated with adverse opioid-related outcomes. Predictive risk models were developed and validated using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression technique. RESULTS The rate of persistent opioid use in cancer survivors was 8.3% (95% CI = 8.1% to 8.4%); the rate of opioid abuse or dependence was 2.9% (95% CI = 2.8% to 3.0%); and the rate of opioid-related admissions was 2.1% (95% CI = 2.0% to 2.2%). On multivariable analysis, several patient, demographic, and cancer and treatment factors were associated with risk of persistent opioid use. Predictive models showed a high level of discrimination when identifying individuals at risk of adverse opioid-related outcomes including persistent opioid use (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85), future diagnoses of opioid abuse or dependence (AUC = 0.87), and admission for opioid abuse or toxicity (AUC = 0.78). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the potential to predict adverse opioid-related outcomes among cancer survivors. With further validation, personalized risk-stratification approaches could guide management when prescribing opioids in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.,Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Paige Sheridan
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rishi Deka
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Timothy Furnish
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.,Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Brent Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.,Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.,Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vitzthum LK, Nalawade V, Riviere P, Sumner W, Nelson T, Mell LK, Furnish T, Rose B, Martínez ME, Murphy JD. Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Discrepancies in Opioid Prescriptions Among Older Patients With Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e703-e713. [PMID: 33534647 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minority race and lower socioeconomic status are associated with lower rates of opioid prescription and undertreatment of pain in multiple noncancer healthcare settings. It is not known whether these differences in opioid prescribing exist among patients undergoing cancer treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS This observational cohort study involved 33,872 opioid-naive patients of age > 65 years undergoing definitive cancer treatment. We compared rates of new opioid prescriptions by race or ethnicity and socioeconomic status controlling for differences in baseline patient, cancer, and treatment factors. To evaluate downstream impacts of opioid prescribing and pain management, we also compared rates of persistent opioid use and pain-related emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, the covariate-adjusted odds of receiving an opioid prescription were 24.9% (95% CI, 16.0 to 33.9, P < .001) lower for non-Hispanic Blacks, 115.0% (84.7 to 150.3, P < .001) higher for Asian-Pacific Islanders, and not statistically different for Hispanics (-1.0 to 14.0, P = .06). There was no significant association between race or ethnicity and persistent opioid use or pain-related ED visits. Patients living in a high-poverty area had higher odds (53.9% [25.4 to 88.8, P < .001]) of developing persistent use and having a pain-related ED visit (39.4% [16.4 to 66.9, P < .001]). CONCLUSION For older patients with cancer, rates of opioid prescriptions and pain-related outcomes significantly differed by race and area-level poverty. Non-Hispanic Black patients were associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of receiving an opioid prescription. Patients from high-poverty areas were more likely to develop persistent opioid use and have a pain-related ED visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Whitney Sumner
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Tyler Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Timothy Furnish
- Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Brent Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - María Elena Martínez
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huynh-Le MP, Tibbs MD, Karunamuni R, Salans M, Tringale KR, Yip A, Connor M, Simon AB, Vitzthum LK, Reyes A, Macari AC, Moiseenko V, McDonald CR, Hattangadi-Gluth JA. Microstructural Injury to Corpus Callosum and Intrahemispheric White Matter Tracts Correlate With Attention and Processing Speed Decline After Brain Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:337-347. [PMID: 33412257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The corpus callosum (CC) and intrahemispheric white matter tracts (IHWM) subserve critical aspects of attention and processing speed. We analyzed imaging biomarkers of microstructural injury within these regions and association with attention and processing speed performance before and after radiation therapy in primary brain tumor patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS In a prospective clinical trial, 44 primary brain tumor patients underwent cognitive testing and magnetic resonance imaging/diffusion-weighted imaging at baseline (pre-radiation therapy) and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-radiation therapy. CC (subregions, total) and IHWM tracts (left/right without CC, total) were autosegmented; tumor, tumor bed, and edema were censored. Biomarkers included volume changes (cm3), mean diffusivity ([MD]; higher values indicate white matter injury), fractional anisotropy ([FA]; lower values indicate white matter injury). Reliable-change indices measured changes in attention (Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale [WAIS-IV] digits-forward; Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making [D-KEFS-TM] visual-scanning), and processing speed (WAIS-IV coding; D-KEFS-TM number-sequencing, letter-sequencing), accounting for practice effects. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated associations between mean radiation dose and biomarkers (volume, MD, FA) and imaging biomarkers and neurocognitive performance. Statistics were corrected for multiple comparisons. RESULTS Processing speed declined at 6 months following radiation therapy (number sequencing, letter sequencing; P < .04). Seizures and antiepileptic drug therapy were associated with lower visual-scanning attention reliable-change indices at 6 months (P = .039). Higher radiation dose correlated with smaller midanterior CC volume (P = .023); lower FA in posterior CC, anterior CC, and total CC (all P < .03); and higher MD in anterior CC (P = .012). Smaller midanterior CC and left IHWM volume correlated with worse processing speed (coding, letter-sequencing, number-sequencing; all P < .03). Higher FA in right, left, and total IHWM correlated with better coding scores (all P < .01). Lower FA in total IHWM (P = .009) was associated with worse visual-scanning attention scores. Higher FA in midposterior CC (P = .029) correlated with better digits-forward attention scores. CONCLUSIONS The CC demonstrated radiation dose-dependent atrophy and WM injury. Microstructural injury within the CC and IHWM was associated with attention and processing speed decline after radiation therapy. These areas represent possible avoidance regions for preservation of attention and processing speed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle D Tibbs
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Roshan Karunamuni
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Mia Salans
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Kathryn R Tringale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anthony Yip
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Michael Connor
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Aaron B Simon
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Anny Reyes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Anna Christina Macari
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Carrie R McDonald
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Riviere P, Vitzthum LK, Nalawade V, Deka R, Furnish T, Mell LK, Rose BS, Wallace M, Murphy JD. Validation of an oncology-specific opioid risk calculator in cancer survivors. Cancer 2020; 127:1529-1535. [PMID: 33378556 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines recommend that providers risk-stratify patients with cancer before prescribing opioids. Prior research has demonstrated that a simple cancer opioid risk score might help identify to patients with cancer at the time of diagnosis with a high likelihood of long-term posttreatment opioid use. This current project validates this cancer opioid risk score in a generalizable, population-based cohort of elderly cancer survivors. METHODS This study identified 44,932 Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who had received local therapy. Longitudinal opioid use was ascertained from Medicare Part D data. A risk score was calculated for each patient, and patients were categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups on the basis of the predicted probability of persistent opioid use. Model discrimination was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS In the study cohort, 5.2% of the patients were chronic opioid users 1 to 2 years after the initiation of cancer treatment. The majority of the patients (64%) were at low risk and had a 1.2% probability of long-term opioid use. Moderate-risk patients (33% of the cohort) had a 5.6% probability of long-term opioid use. High-risk patients (3.5% of the cohort) had a 75% probability of long-term opioid use. The opioid risk score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.869. CONCLUSIONS This study found that a cancer opioid risk score could accurately identify individuals with a high likelihood of long-term opioid use in a large, generalizable cohort of cancer survivors. Future research should focus on the implementation of these scores into clinical practice and how this could affect prescriber behavior and patient outcomes. LAY SUMMARY A novel 5-question clinical decision tool allows physicians treating patients with cancer to accurately predict which patients will persistently be using opioid medications after completing therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Rishi Deka
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Timothy Furnish
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Mark Wallace
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zakeri K, Rotolo F, Lacas B, Vitzthum LK, Le QT, Gregoire V, Overgaard J, Hackshaw A, Zackrisson B, Parmar MKB, Burtness BA, Ghi MG, Sanguineti G, O'Sullivan B, Fortpied C, Bourhis J, Shen H, Harris J, Michiels S, Pignon JP, Mell LK. Predictive classifier for intensive treatment of head and neck cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:5263-5273. [PMID: 33017867 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the effectiveness of intensive treatment for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) depends on the proportion of patients' overall event risk attributable to cancer. METHODS This study analyzed 22,339 patients with LAHNC treated in 81 randomized trials testing altered fractionation (AFX; Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH] data set) or chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC] data set). Generalized competing event regression was applied to the control arms in MARCH, and patients were stratified by tertile according to the ω score, which quantified the relative hazard for cancer versus competing events. The classifier was externally validated on the MACH-NC data set. The study tested for interactions between the ω score and treatment effects on overall survival (OS). RESULTS Factors associated with a higher ω score were a younger age, a better performance status, an oral cavity site, higher T and N categories, and a p16-negative/unknown status. The effect of AFX on OS was greater in patients with high ω scores (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.99) and medium ω scores (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98) versus low ω scores (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05; P for interaction = .086). The effect of chemotherapy on OS was significantly greater in patients with high ω scores (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88) and medium ω scores (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) versus low ω scores (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86-1.08; P for interaction = .011). CONCLUSIONS LAHNC patients with a higher risk of cancer progression relative to competing mortality, as reflected by a higher ω score, selectively benefit from more intensive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Federico Rotolo
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, Cancer Institute, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences-Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mahesh K B Parmar
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- Headquarters, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hanjie Shen
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vitzthum LK, Heide ES, Park H, Williamson CW, Sheridan P, Huynh-Le MP, Sirak I, Wei L, Tarnawski R, Mahantshetty U, Nguyen C, Mayadev J, Yashar CM, Sacco AG, Mell LK. Comparison of Hematologic Toxicity and Bone Marrow Compensatory Response in Head and Neck vs. Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1179. [PMID: 32793487 PMCID: PMC7385402 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Hematologic toxicity is a critical problem limiting treatment delivery in cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, the extent to which anatomic variations in radiation dose limit chemotherapy delivery is poorly understood. A unique natural experiment arises in patients with head and neck and cervical cancer, who frequently undergo identical chemotherapy but receive radiation to different regions of the body. Comparing these cohorts can help elucidate to what extent hematologic toxicity is attributable to marrow radiation as opposed to chemotherapy. Methods: In this longitudinal cohort study, we compared hematologic toxicity and bone marrow compensatory response in 148 patients (90 cervix, 58 head/neck) undergoing chemoradiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. We used linear mixed effect models to compare baseline and time-varying peripheral cell counts and hemoglobin levels between cohorts. To assess bone marrow compensatory response, we measured the change in metabolically active bone marrow (ABM) volume on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Results: We observed greater reductions in log-transformed lymphocyte, platelet, and absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) for cervix compared to head/neck cancer patients (fixed effects for time-cohort interaction [95% CI]: lymphocytes, −0.06 [−0.09, −0.031]; platelets,−0.028 [-0.051, −0.0047]; ANC, −0.043 [−0.075, −0.011]). Mean ANC nadirs were also lower for cervical vs. head/neck cancer cohorts (2.20 vs. 2.85 × 103 per μL, p < 0.01). Both cohorts exhibited reductions in ABM volume within the radiation field, and increases in ABM volume in out-of-field areas, indicating varying compensatory response to radiation injury. Conclusions: Cervical cancer patients had faster decreases in ANC, lymphocyte, and platelet counts, and lower ANC nadirs, indicating a significant effect of pelvic irradiation on acute peripheral blood cell counts. Both cohorts exhibited a compensatory response with increased out-of-field bone marrow activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Elena S Heide
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Helen Park
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Casey W Williamson
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Paige Sheridan
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Igor Sirak
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia
| | - Lichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Rafal Tarnawski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | | | - Cammie Nguyen
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Assuntina G Sacco
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Loren K Mell
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K. Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - James D. Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Deka R, Parsons JK, Simpson DR, Riviere P, Nalawade V, Vitzthum LK, Kader AK, Kane CJ, Rock CS, Murphy JD, Rose BS. African-American men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in an equal-access health care system: implications for active surveillance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23:581-588. [DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0230-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
30
|
Simon AB, Vitzthum LK, Mell LK. Challenge of Directly Comparing Imaging-Based Diagnoses Made by Machine Learning Algorithms With Those Made by Human Clinicians. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:1868-1869. [PMID: 32271670 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.03350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron B Simon
- Aaron B. Simon, MD, PhD and Lucas K. Vitzthum, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; and Loren K. Mell, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, and Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Aaron B. Simon, MD, PhD and Lucas K. Vitzthum, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; and Loren K. Mell, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, and Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Aaron B. Simon, MD, PhD and Lucas K. Vitzthum, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; and Loren K. Mell, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, and Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Riviere P, Luterstein E, Kumar A, Vitzthum LK, Deka R, Sarkar RR, Bryant AK, Bruggeman A, Einck JP, Murphy JD, Martínez ME, Rose BS. Survival of African American and non-Hispanic white men with prostate cancer in an equal-access health care system. Cancer 2020; 126:1683-1690. [PMID: 31984482 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND African American (AA) men in the general US population are more than twice as likely to die of prostate cancer (PC) compared with non-Hispanic white (NHW) men. The authors hypothesized that receiving care through the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system, an equal-access medical system, would attenuate this disparity. METHODS A longitudinal, centralized database of >20 million veterans was used to assemble a cohort of 60,035 men (18,201 AA men [30.3%] and 41,834 NHW men [69.7%]) who were diagnosed with PC between 2000 and 2015. RESULTS AA men were more likely to live in regions with a lower median income ($40,871 for AA men vs $48,125 for NHW men; P < .001) and lower high school graduation rates (83% for AA men vs 88% for NHW men; P < .001). At the time of diagnosis, AA men were younger (median age, 63.0 years vs 66.0 years; P < .001) and had a higher prostate-specific antigen level (median, 6.7 ng/mL vs 6.2 ng/mL; P < .001), but were less likely to have Gleason score 8 to 10 disease (18.8% among AA men vs 19.7% among NHW men; P < .001), a clinical T classification ≥3 (2.2% vs 2.9%; P < .001), or distant metastatic disease (2.7% vs 3.1%; P = 0.01). The 10-year PC-specific mortality rate was slightly lower for AA men (4.4% vs 5.1%; P = .005), which was confirmed in multivariable competing-risk analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AA men diagnosed with PC in the VA health system do not appear to present with more advanced disease or experience worse outcomes compared with NHW men, in contrast to national trends, suggesting that access to care is an important determinant of racial equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Research Service, VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Elaine Luterstein
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Research Service, VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Rishi Deka
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Research Service, VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Reith R Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Research Service, VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - Alex K Bryant
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Andrew Bruggeman
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - John P Einck
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Research Service, VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| | - María Elena Martínez
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Research Service, VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vitzthum LK, Park H, Zakeri K, Bryant AK, Feng C, Shen H, Cohen EE, Murphy JD, Mell LK. Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Intensive Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:157-166. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
33
|
Vitzthum LK, Straka C, Sarkar RR, McKay R, Randall JM, Sandhu A, Murphy JD, Rose BS. Combined Androgen Blockade in Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:1497-1504. [PMID: 31805534 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy (RT) improves survival in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but it is not known whether combined androgen blockade (CAB) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-A) and a nonsteroidal antiandrogen improves survival over GnRH-A monotherapy. METHODS This study evaluated patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa diagnosed in 2001 through 2015 who underwent RT with either GnRH-A alone or CAB using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. Associations between CAB and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS) were determined using multivariable regression with Fine-Gray and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. For a positive control, the effect of long-term versus short-term GnRH-A therapy was tested. RESULTS The cohort included 8,423 men (GnRH-A, 4,529; CAB, 3,894) with a median follow-up of 5.9 years. There were 1,861 deaths, including 349 resulting from PCa. The unadjusted cumulative incidences of PCSM at 10 years were 5.9% and 6.9% for those receiving GnRH-A and CAB, respectively (P=.16). Compared with GnRH-A alone, CAB was not associated with a significant difference in covariate-adjusted PCSM (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.30) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.12). For high-risk patients, long-term versus short-term GnRH-A therapy was associated with improved PCSM (SHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.95) and OS (SHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93). CONCLUSIONS In men receiving definitive RT for intermediate- or high-risk PCa, CAB was not associated with improved PCSM or OS compared with GnRH alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Straka
- aDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | | | - Rana McKay
- bDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
| | - J Michael Randall
- bDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
| | - Ajay Sandhu
- aDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.,cClinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - James D Murphy
- aDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.,cClinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Brent S Rose
- aDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.,cClinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vitzthum LK, Feng CH, Noticewala S, Hines PJ, Nguyen C, Zakeri K, Sojourner EJ, Shen H, Mell LK. Comparison of Comorbidity and Frailty Indices in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Using an Online Tool. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 2:1-9. [PMID: 30652602 DOI: 10.1200/cci.18.00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Comorbidity is an independent predictor of mortality and treatment tolerance in head and neck cancer and should be considered with regard to treatment intensification. Multiple previously validated models can be used to evaluate comorbidity and propensity to benefit from intensive treatment, but they have not been directly compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online tool was developed and used to calculate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G), Geriatric 8 (G8), Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG), and Generalized Competing Event (GCE) scores. To assess interrater variability, five evaluators independently calculated scores on a retrospective cohort of 20 patients. Correlation between models as well as age and performance status were calculated from a cohort of 40 patients. RESULTS The GCE and G8 models had an excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient and Fleiss' kappa ≥ 0.75) degree of interrater agreement. The CCI, ACE-27, CIRS-G, and CARG had a good (intraclass correlation coefficient and Fleiss' kappa 0.6-0.74) degree of interrater agreement. There was statistically significant correlation between models, especially with the CCI, ACE-27, and CIRS-G indices. Increased age was correlated with an increased CCI score and having moderate to severe comorbidity was correlated with the ACE-27 model. Except for the G8 model, the comorbidity indices were not associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. CONCLUSION We developed an online tool to calculate indices of comorbidity in patients with head and neck cancer with a high degree of reproducibility. Comorbidity is not strongly correlated with performance status and should be independently evaluated in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Christine H Feng
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Sonal Noticewala
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Paul J Hines
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Cammie Nguyen
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Elena J Sojourner
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Hanjie Shen
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Loren K Mell
- Lucas K. Vitzthum, Christine H. Feng, Sonal Noticewala, Cammie Nguyen, Kaveh Zakeri, Elena J. Sojourner, and Hanjie Shen, University of California San Diego; Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego; Center for Translational Radiation Medicine and Imaging, La Jolla, CA; and Paul J. Hines, Dose Health, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mell LK, Shen H, Nguyen-Tân PF, Rosenthal DI, Zakeri K, Vitzthum LK, Frank SJ, Schiff PB, Trotti AM, Bonner JA, Jones CU, Yom SS, Thorstad WL, Wong SJ, Shenouda G, Ridge JA, Zhang QE, Le QT. Nomogram to Predict the Benefit of Intensive Treatment for Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:7078-7088. [PMID: 31420360 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies indicate that the benefit of therapy depends on patients' risk for cancer recurrence relative to noncancer mortality (ω ratio). We sought to test the hypothesis that patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) with a higher ω ratio selectively benefit from intensive therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We analyzed 2,688 patients with stage III-IVB HNC undergoing primary radiotherapy (RT) with or without systemic therapy on three phase III trials (RTOG 9003, RTOG 0129, and RTOG 0522). We used generalized competing event regression to stratify patients according to ω ratio and compared the effectiveness of intensive therapy as a function of predicted ω ratio (i.e., ω score). Intensive therapy was defined as treatment on an experimental arm with altered fractionation and/or multiagent concurrent systemic therapy. A nomogram was developed to predict patients' ω score on the basis of tumor, demographic, and health factors. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS Decreasing age, improved performance status, higher body mass index, node-positive status, P16-negative status, and oral cavity primary predicted a higher ω ratio. Patients with ω score ≥0.80 were more likely to benefit from intensive treatment [5-year overall survival (OS), 70.0% vs. 56.6%; HR of 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.94; P = 0.016] than those with ω score <0.80 (5-year OS, 46.7% vs. 45.3%; HR of 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14; P = 0.69; P = 0.019 for interaction). In contrast, the effectiveness of intensive therapy did not depend on risk of progression. CONCLUSIONS Patients with HNC with a higher ω score selectively benefit from intensive treatment. A nomogram was developed to help select patients for intensive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| | - Hanjie Shen
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Peter B Schiff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Andy M Trotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - James A Bonner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hazelrig-Salter Radiation Oncology Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Sue S Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Wade L Thorstad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stuart J Wong
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - George Shenouda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - John A Ridge
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Qiang E Zhang
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zakeri K, Panjwani N, Carmona R, Shen H, Vitzthum LK, Zhang QE, Murphy JD, Mell LK. Generalized Competing Event Models Can Reduce Cost and Duration of Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 2:1-12. [PMID: 30652559 DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Generalized competing event (GCE) models improve stratification of patients according to their risk of cancer events relative to competing causes of mortality. The potential impact of such methods on clinical trial power and cost, however, is uncertain. We sought to test the hypothesis that GCE models can reduce estimated clinical trial cost in elderly patients with cancer. METHODS Patients with nonmetastatic head and neck (n = 9,677), breast (n = 22,929), or prostate cancer (n = 51,713) were sampled from the SEER-Medicare database. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we compared risk scores for all-cause mortality (ACM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) with GCE-based risk scores for each disease. We applied a cost function to estimate the cost and duration of clinical trials with a primary end point of overall survival in each population and in high-risk subpopulations. We conducted sensitivity analyses to examine model uncertainty. RESULTS For the purpose of enriching subpopulations, GCE models reduced estimated clinical trial cost compared with Cox models of ACM and CSM in all disease sites. The relative cost reductions with GCE models compared with ACM and CSM models, respectively, were -68.4% and -14.4% in prostate cancer, -38.8% and -18.3% in breast cancer, and -17.1% and -4.1% in head and neck cancer. Cost savings in breast and prostate cancers were on the order of millions of dollars. The GCE model also reduced relative clinical trial duration compared with CSM and ACM models for all disease sites. The optimal risk score cutoff for clinical trial enrollment occurred near the top tertile for all disease sites. CONCLUSION GCE models have significant potential to improve clinical trial efficiency and reduce cost, with a potentially large impact in prostate and breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Zakeri
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Neil Panjwani
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ruben Carmona
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Hanjie Shen
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Qiang E Zhang
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James D Murphy
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Kaveh Zakeri, Neil Panjwani, Hanjie Shen, Lucas K. Vitzthum, James D. Murphy, and Loren K. Mell, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Ruben Carmona, University of Pennsylvania; and Qiang E. Zhang, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bryant AK, Sojourner EJ, Vitzthum LK, Zakeri K, Shen H, Nguyen C, Murphy JD, Califano JA, Cohen EEW, Mell LK. Prognostic Role of p16 in Nonoropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:1393-1399. [PMID: 29878161 PMCID: PMC6292787 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies have reported conflicting information regarding the prognostic role of p16 in nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods Using the US Veterans Affairs database, we analyzed 1448 patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC and known p16 status diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 and treated with surgery, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. Tumor p16 status was determined through manual review of pathology reports of primary tumor specimens. Oropharyngeal (n = 1061) or nonoropharyngeal (n = 387; hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, or oral cavity) tumor site was determined from tumor registry data and manually reviewed for accuracy. We used multivariable Cox regression to analyze the effect of p16 status on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and competing mortality (CM) for oropharyngeal or nonoropharyngeal tumor sites. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results In multivariable models adjusting for treatment, stage, age, comorbidity, and body mass index, patients with p16-positive tumors had improved OS, CSS, and CM compared with patients with p16-negative tumors in both oropharyngeal (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40 to 0.71, P < .001; CSS: HR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.73, P < .001; CM: HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.93, P = .02) and nonoropharyngeal primary sites (OS: HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.69, P < .001; CSS: HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.77, P = .008; CM: HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.95, P = .04). The prognostic impact of p16 status did not statistically significantly differ by primary tumor site for OS, CSS, or CM (Pinteraction > .05). Conclusions Our findings support the hypothesis that p16 has a similar prognostic role in both nonoropharyngeal and oropharyngeal cancer. Consideration should be given to increased testing for p16 in laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, and oral cavity primaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex K Bryant
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | | | | | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Hanjie Shen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health
| | | | | | | | - Ezra E W Cohen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vitzthum LK, Brown LC, Rooney JW, Foote RL. Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated with Radiation Therapy. Rare Tumors 2016; 8:6165. [PMID: 27441072 PMCID: PMC4935821 DOI: 10.4081/rt.2016.6165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Revised: 11/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas (HNSTSs) are rare and heterogeneous cancers in which radiation therapy (RT) has an important role in local tumor control (LC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and patterns of treatment failure in patients with HNSTS treated with RT. A retrospective review was performed of adult patients with HNSTS treated with RT from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2012. LC, locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and predictors thereof were assessed. Forty-eight patients with HNSTS were evaluated. Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of LC, LRC, DFS, and OS were 87, 73, 63, and 83%, respectively. Angiosarcomas were found to be associated with worse LC, LRC, DFS, and OS. Patients over the age of 60 had lower rates of DFS. HNSTSs comprise a diverse group of tumors that can be managed with various treatment regimens involving RT. Angiosarcomas have higher recurrence and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lindsay C Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica W Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sagstetter AM, Vitzthum LK, Meyer JR, Nimunkar AJ, Webster JG. Global engineering education initiative through student organization. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 2009:2022-2024. [PMID: 19964768 DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2009.5334420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Engineering is becoming a more globally aware discipline that is revolutionizing the way individuals interact internationally. Engineering World Health (EWH) - Madison Chapter is a student-initiated organization that has developed opportunities to facilitate both local and global engineering education. Through EWH - Madison Chapter student-initiated activities, this organization has developed an interface between Traditional, Technical, and Translational education mediums. This study attests to the development of global engineering programs in the context of biomedical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Sagstetter
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|