Repeatability of SUV measurements in serial PET

Optimisation of scan duration and image quality in oncological 89Zr immunoPET imaging using the Biograph Vision PET/CT

PURPOSE

Monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based PET (immunoPET) imaging can characterise tumour lesions non-invasively. It may be a valuable tool to determine which patients may benefit from treatment with a specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) and evaluate treatment response. For 89Zr immunoPET imaging, higher sensitivity of state-of-the art PET/CT systems equipped with silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based detector elements may be beneficial as the low positron abundance of 89Zr causes a low signal-to-noise level. Moreover, the long physical half-life limits the amount of activity that can be administered to the patients leading to poor image quality even when using long scan durations. Here, we investigated the difference in semiquantitative performance between the PMT-based Biograph mCT, our clinical reference system, and the SiPM-based Biograph Vision PET/CT in 89Zr immunoPET imaging. Furthermore, the effects of scan duration reduction using the Vision on semiquantitative imaging parameters and its influence on image quality assessment were evaluated.

METHODS

Data were acquired on day 4 post 37 MBq 89Zr-labelled mAb injection. Five patients underwent a double scan protocol on both systems. Ten patients were scanned only on the Vision. For PET image reconstruction, three protocols were used, i.e. one camera-dependent protocol and European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Limited (EARL) standards 1 and 2 compliant protocols. Vision data were acquired in listmode and were reprocessed to obtain images at shorter scan durations. Semiquantitative PET image parameters were derived from tumour lesions and healthy tissues to assess differences between systems and scan durations. Differently reconstructed images obtained using the Vision were visually scored regarding image quality by two nuclear medicine physicians.

RESULTS

When images were reconstructed using 100% acquisition time on both systems following EARL standard 1 compliant reconstruction protocols, results regarding semiquantification were comparable. For Vision data, reconstructed images that conform to EARL1 standards still resulted in comparable semiquantification at shorter scan durations (75% and 50%) regarding 100% acquisition time.

CONCLUSION

Scan duration of 89Zr immunoPET imaging using the Vision can be decreased up to 50% compared with using the mCT while maintaining image quality using the EARL1 compliant reconstruction protocol.

Analyzing spatial distribution between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-boronophenylalanine positron emission tomography to investigate selection indicators for boron neutron capture therapy

BACKGROUND

¹⁸F-FDG PET is often utilized to determine BNCT selection due to the limited availability of ¹⁸F-BPA PET, which is performed by synthesizing ¹⁸F into the boron drug used for BNCT, although the uptake mechanisms between those are different. Additionally, only a few non-spatial point parameters, such as maximum SUV (SUV_max), have reported a correlation between those in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the spatial accumulation pattern between those PET images in tumors, which would be expected to either show higher uptake on ¹⁸F-BPA PET or be utilized in clinical, to verify whether ¹⁸F-FDG PET could be used as a selection indicator for BNCT.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients with 30 lesions (11 squamous cell carcinoma, 9 melanoma, and 10 rhabdomyosarcoma) who received ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-BPA PET within 2 weeks were enrolled in this study. The ratio of metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) to GTV, histogram indices (skewness/kurtosis), and the correlation of total lesion activity (TLA) and non-spatial point parameters (SUV_max, SUV_peak, SUV_min, maximum tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (T_max/N), and T_min/N) were evaluated. After local rigid registration between those images, distances of locations at SUV_max and the center of mass with MTVs on each image and similarity indices were also assessed along its coordinate.

RESULTS

In addition to SUV_max, SUV_peak, and T_max/N, significant correlations were found in TLA. The mean distance in SUV_max was [Formula: see text] and significantly longer than that in the center of mass with MTVs. The ratio of MTVs to GTV, skewness, and kurtosis were not significantly different. However, the similarities of MTVs were considerably low. The similarity indices of Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard coefficient, and mean distance to agreement for MTV40 were [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] cm, respectively. Furthermore, it was worse in MTV50. In addition, spatial accumulation patterns varied in cancer types.

CONCLUSIONS

Spatial accumulation patterns in tumors showed low similarity between ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-BPA PET, although the various non-spatial point parameters were correlated. In addition, the spatial accumulation patterns were considerably different in cancer types. Therefore, the selection for BNCT using ¹⁸F-FDG PET should be compared carefully with using ¹⁸F-FBPA PET.

Test-retest repeatability and interobserver variation of healthy tissue metabolism using 18F-FDG PET/CT of the thorax among lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the test-retest repeatability and interobserver variation in healthy tissue (HT) metabolism using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) of the thorax in lung cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in 22 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had two PET/CT scans of the thorax performed 3 days apart with no interval treatment. The maximum, mean and peak standardized uptake values (SUVs) in different HTs were measured by a single observer for the test-retest analysis and two observers for interobserver variation. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the repeatability and interobserver variation. Intrasubject variability was evaluated using within-subject coefficients of variation (wCV).

RESULTS

The wCV of test-retest SUVmean measurements in mediastinal blood pool, bone marrow, skeletal muscles and lungs was less than 20%. The left ventricle (LV) showed higher wCV (>60%) in all SUV parameters with wide limits of repeatability. High interobserver agreement was found with wCV of less than 10% in SUVmean of all HT, but up to 22% was noted in the LV.

CONCLUSION

HT metabolism is stable in a test-retest scenario and has high interobserver agreement. SUVmean was the most stable metric in organs with low FDG uptake and SUVpeak in HTs with moderate uptake. Test-retest measurements in LV were highly variable irrespective of the SUV parameters used for measurements.

The Utility of PET/CT Metabolic Parameters Measured Based on Fixed Percentage Threshold of SUVmax and Adaptive Iterative Algorithm in the New Revised FIGO Staging System for Stage III Cervical Cancer

Objectives: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in metabolic parameters of positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) measured based on fixed percentage threshold of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and adaptive iterative algorithm (AT-AIA) in patients with cervical cancer. Metabolic parameters in stage III patients subdivided into five groups according to FIGO and T staging (IIIB-T3B, IIIC1-T2B, IIIC1-T3B, IIIC2-T2B, IIIC2-T3B) were compared.

Methods: In total, 142 patients with squamous cell cervical cancer subjected to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT before treatment were retrospectively reviewed. SUVmax, mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), maximum glucose homogenization (GNmax), mean glucose homogenization (GNmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and glucose homogenization total lesion glycolysis (GNTLG) values measured based on the above two measurement methods of all 142 patients (IIB-IVB) and 102 patients in the above five groups were compared.

Results: MTV measured based on fixed percentage threshold of SUVmax was lower than that based on AT-AIA (p < 0.05). MTV_40%, MTV_0.5, TLG_0.5, GNTLG_40%, and GNTLG_0.5 values were significantly different among the five groups (p < 0.05) while the rest parameters were comparable (p > 0.05). All metabolic parameters of group IIIB-T3B were comparable to those of the other four groups. MTV_40%, MTV_0.5, GNTLG_40%, and GNTLG_0.5 in group IIIC1-T2B relative to IIIC1-T3B and those of group IIIC2-T2B relative to group IIIC2-T3B were significantly different. All metabolic parameters of group IIIC1-T2B relative to IIIC2-T2B and those of group IIIC1-T3B relative to group IIIC2-T3B were not significantly different.

Conclusion: Metabolic parameters obtained with the two measurement methods showed a number of differences. Selection of appropriate methods for measurement of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT metabolic parameters is important to facilitate advances in laboratory research and clinical applications. When stage III patients had the same T stage, their metabolic parameters of local tumor were not significantly different, regardless of the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis, location of metastatic lymph nodes in the pelvic cavity or para-abdominal aorta. These results support the utility of the revised FIGO system for stage III cervical cancer, although our T-staging of stage III disease is incomplete.

Population-based input function for TSPO quantification and kinetic modeling with [11C]-DPA-713

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) studies of neurodegenerative diseases typically require the measurement of arterial input functions (AIF), an invasive and risky procedure. This study aims to assess the reproducibility of [11C]DPA-713 PET kinetic analysis using population-based input function (PBIF). The final goal is to possibly eliminate the need for AIF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen subjects including six healthy volunteers (HV) and twelve Parkinson disease (PD) subjects from two [11C]-DPA-713 PET studies were included. Each subject underwent 90 min of dynamic PET imaging. Five healthy volunteers underwent a test-retest scan within the same day to assess the repeatability of the kinetic parameters. Kinetic modeling was carried out using the Logan total volume of distribution (VT) model. For each data set, kinetic analysis was performed using a patient-specific AIF (PSAIF, ground-truth standard) and then repeated using the PBIF. PBIF was generated using the leave-one-out method for each subject from the remaining 17 subjects and after normalizing the PSAIFs by 3 techniques: (a) Weightsubject×DoseInjected, (b) area under AIF curve (AUC), and (c) Weightsubject×AUC. The variability in the VT measured with PSAIF, in the test-retest study, was determined for selected brain regions (white matter, cerebellum, thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, brainstem, hippocampus, and amygdala) using the Bland-Altman analysis and for each of the 3 normalization techniques. Similarly, for all subjects, the variabilities due to the use of PBIF were assessed.

RESULTS

Bland-Altman analysis showed systematic bias between test and retest studies. The corresponding mean bias and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for the studied brain regions were 30% and ± 70%. Comparing PBIF- and PSAIF-based VT estimate for all subjects and all brain regions, a significant difference between the results generated by the three normalization techniques existed for all brain structures except for the brainstem (P-value = 0.095). The mean % difference and 95% LOA is -10% and ±45% for Weightsubject×DoseInjected; +8% and ±50% for AUC; and +2% and ± 38% for Weightsubject×AUC. In all cases, normalizing by Weightsubject×AUC yielded the smallest % bias and variability (% bias = ±2%; LOA = ±38% for all brain regions). Estimating the reproducibility of PBIF-kinetics to PSAIF based on disease groups (HV/PD) and genotype (MAB/HAB), the average VT values for all regions obtained from PBIF is insignificantly higher than PSAIF (%difference = 4.53%, P-value = 0.73 for HAB; and %difference = 0.73%, P-value = 0.96 for MAB). PBIF also tends to overestimate the difference between PD and HV for HAB (% difference = 32.33% versus 13.28%) and underestimate it in MAB (%difference = 6.84% versus 20.92%).

CONCLUSIONS

PSAIF kinetic results are reproducible with PBIF, with variability in VT within that obtained for the test-retest studies. Therefore, VT assessed using PBIF-based kinetic modeling is clinically feasible and can be an alternative to PSAIF.

Patterns-of-failure guided biological target volume definition for head and neck cancer patients: FDG-PET and dosimetric analysis of dose escalation candidate subregions

BACKGROUND

To identify the radio-resistant subvolumes in pretreatment FDG-PET by mapping the spatial location of the origin of tumor recurrence after IMRT for head-and-neck squamous cell cancer to the pretreatment FDG-PET/CT.

METHODS

Patients with local/regional recurrence after IMRT with available FDG-PET/CT and post-failure CT were included. For each patient, both pre-therapy PET/CT and recurrence CT were co-registered with the planning CT (pCT). A 4-mm radius was added to the centroid of mapped recurrence growth target volumes (rGTV's) to create recurrence nidus-volumes (NVs). The overlap between boost-tumor-volumes (BTV) representing different SUV thresholds/margins combinations and NVs was measured.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were eligible. Forty-two (89.4%) had type A central high dose failure. Twenty-six (48%) of type A rGTVs were at the primary site and 28 (52%) were at the nodal site. The mean dose of type A rGTVs was 71Gy. BTV consisting of 50% of the maximum SUV plus 10mm margin was the best subvolume for dose boosting due to high coverage of primary site NVs (92.3%), low average relative volume to CTV1 (41%), and least average percent voxels outside CTV1 (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of loco-regional recurrences originate in the regions of central-high-dose. When correlated with pretreatment FDG-PET, the majority of recurrences originated in an area that would be covered by additional 10mm margin on the volume of 50% of the maximum FDG uptake.

Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET

Quantitative analysis can potentially improve the accuracy and consistency of ¹⁸F-FDG PET, particularly for the assessment of tumor response to treatment. Although not without limitations, SUV has emerged as the predominant metric for tumor quantification with ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Growing literature suggests that the difference between SUVs measured before and after treatment can be used to predict tumor response at an early stage. SUV is, however, associated with multiple sources of variability, and to best use SUV for response assessment, an understanding of the repeatability of the technique is required. Test-retest studies involve repeated scanning of the same patient on the same scanner using the same protocol no more than a few days apart and provide basic information on the repeatability of the technique. Multiple test-retest studies have been performed to assess SUV repeatability, although a comparison of reports is complicated by the use of different methodologies and statistical metrics. This article reviews the available data, addressing issues such as different repeatability metrics, relative units, log transformation, and asymmetric limits of repeatability. When acquired with careful attention to protocol, tumor SUV has a within-subject coefficient of variation of approximately 10%. In a response assessment setting, SUV reductions of more than 25% and increases of more than 33% are unlikely to be due to measurement variability. Broader margins may be required for sites with less rigorous protocol compliance, but in general, SUV is a highly repeatable imaging biomarker that is ideally suited to monitoring tumor response to treatment in individual patients.

Longitudinal monitoring of reconstructed activity concentration on a clinical time-of-flight PET/CT scanner

Positron emission tomography (PET) images are potential quantitative biomarkers. Understanding long-term (months/years) biomarker variability is important for establishing confidence intervals on studies using such biomarkers over these time frames. PET biomarkers are derived from activity concentration ([Formula: see text]) extracted from PET images. Over 30 months, we measured the stability of decay-normalized counts ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] by scanning the same 4.5-cm-diameter Ge-68 cylinder weekly, the same Na-22 point source daily, and a refilled 20-cm F-18 cylinder phantom monthly on a clinical TOF-PET/CT scanner. Longitudinal and adjacent-measurement variability was characterized. We found no drift in [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] for properly calibrated images over 24 months. During this time, [Formula: see text] ranged [Formula: see text] to 6% for count-matched Ge-68 and F-18 images, with coefficient of variation (COV) across time of 2.3% (Ge-68, 81 scans) and 3.2% (F-18, 24 scans). At typical patient image count levels the Ge-68 [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) COV across time was 6.9% (9.6%). Changes in [Formula: see text] between adjacent F-18 scans ([Formula: see text]) ranged between [Formula: see text], with corresponding date-matched changes in Ge-68 [Formula: see text] ranging [Formula: see text]. We recommend (1) tracking trends in [Formula: see text] with image [Formula: see text] as a check of quantitative data corrections/calibrations and (2) tracking both mean and COV of [Formula: see text] (single time point measures) to hundredths precision using standardized uptake values.

Relationship between the image quality and noise-equivalent count in time-of-flight positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the NEC and TOF-PET image quality.

METHODS

The National Electrical Manufactures Association and International Electrical Commission (NEMA IEC) body phantom with a 10-mm diameter sphere was filled with an 18F-FDG solution with a 4:1 radioactivity ratio. The PET data were acquired in the three-dimensional list mode for 20 min. We created frame data ranging from 1 to 5 min acquisition time, which were then reconstructed using the baseline ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), the OSEM + point spread function (PSF) algorithm, OSEM + time-of-flight (TOF) algorithm and OSEM + PSF + TOF algorithm. The PET images were analyzed according to the noise-equivalent count (NEC), the coefficients of variance of the background (CVBG), the maximum count (CVmax) and the contrast (CVCONT). The results were compared with the recommended value according to the guidelines for the oncology FDG-PET/CT protocol.

RESULTS

The NEC was higher than the recommended value at 3 min or longer acquisition time. The CVBG lower than 15% were obtained at 3 min acquisition time without TOF and at 2 min acquisition time with TOF. The CVBG of 10% or lower were obtained at 5 min or longer acquisition time without TOF and at 4 min or longer acquisition time with TOF. Both the CVmax and CVCONT lower than 10% were obtained at 3 min or longer acquisition time without TOF and at 1 min acquisition or longer with TOF. No particular relationships were observed between the frame number and degree of the variation in the image quality. The CVCONT significantly correlated with the NEC for the data reconstructed without TOF information, while there were no significant correlations between these useful metrics for the data reconstructed with TOF.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the NEC is not a useful metric for the evaluation of the image quality on TOF-PET images.

On the Reliability of Automatic Volume Delineation in Low-Contrast [(18)F]FMISO-PET Imaging

Hypoxia is a marker of poor prognosis in malignant tumors independent from the selected therapeutic method and the therapy should be intensified in such tumors. Hypoxia imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is limited by low contrast to noise ratios with every available tracer. In radiation oncology appropriate delineation is required to allow therapy and intensification. While manual segmentation results are highly dependent from experience and observers condition (high inter- and intra observer variability), threshold- and gradient-based algorithms for automatic segmentation frequently fail in low contrast data sets. Likewise, calibration of these algorithms using phantoms is not useful. Complex computational models such as swarm intelligence-based algorithms are promising tools for optimized segmentation results and allow observer independent interpretation of multimodal and multidimensional imaging data.

Determining the Minimal Required Radioactivity of 18F-FDG for Reliable Semiquantification in PET/CT Imaging: A Phantom Study

In pursuit of as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) doses, this study investigated the minimal required radioactivity and corresponding imaging time for reliable semiquantification in PET/CT imaging.

METHODS

Using a phantom containing spheres of various diameters (3.4, 2.1, 1.5, 1.2, and 1.0 cm) filled with a fixed (18)F-FDG concentration of 165 kBq/mL and a background concentration of 23.3 kBq/mL, we performed PET/CT at multiple time points over 20 h of radioactive decay. The images were acquired for 10 min at a single bed position for each of 10 half-lives of decay using 3-dimensional list mode and were reconstructed into 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 10-min acquisitions per bed position using an ordered-subsets expectation maximum algorithm with 24 subsets and 2 iterations and a gaussian 2-mm filter. SUVmax and SUVavg were measured for each sphere.

RESULTS

The minimal required activity (±10%) for precise SUVmax semiquantification in the spheres was 1.8 kBq/mL for an acquisition of 10 min, 3.7 kBq/mL for 3-5 min, 7.9 kBq/mL for 2 min, and 17.4 kBq/mL for 1 min. The minimal required activity concentration-acquisition time product per bed position was 10-15 kBq/mL⋅min for reproducible SUV measurements within the spheres without overestimation. Using the total radioactivity and counting rate from the entire phantom, we found that the minimal required total activity-time product was 17 MBq⋅min and the minimal required counting rate-time product was 100 kcps⋅min.

CONCLUSION

Our phantom study determined a threshold for minimal radioactivity and acquisition time for precise semiquantification in (18)F-FDG PET imaging that can serve as a guide in pursuit of achieving ALARA doses.

Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study

Standardized uptake values (SUVs) have been widely used in the diagnosis of malignant tumors and in clinical trials of tumor therapies as semiquantitative metrics of tumor (18)F-FDG uptake. However, SUVs for small lesions are liable to errors due to partial-volume effect and statistical noise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of maximum and peak SUV (SUVmax and SUVpeak, respectively) of small lesions in phantom experiments.

METHODS

We used a body phantom with 6 spheres in a quarter warm background. The PET data were acquired for 1,800 s in list-mode, from which data were extracted to generate 15 PET images for each of the 60-, 90-, 120-, 150-, and 180-s scanning times. The SUVmax and SUVpeak of the hot spheres in the 1,800-s scan were used as a reference (SUVref,max and SUVref,peak). Coefficients of variation for both SUVmax and SUVpeak in hot spheres (CVmax and CVpeak) were calculated to evaluate the variability of the SUVs. On the other hand, percentage differences between SUVmax and SUVref,max and between SUVpeak and SUVref,peak were calculated for evaluation of the accuracy of SUV. We additionally examined the coefficients of variation of background activity and the percentage background variability as parameters for the physical assessment of image quality.

RESULTS

Visibility of a 10-mm-diameter hot sphere was considerably different among scan frames. The CVmax and CVpeak increased as the sphere size became smaller and as the acquisition time became shorter. SUVmax was generally overestimated as the scan time shortened and the sphere size increased. The SUVmax and SUVpeak of a 37-mm-diameter sphere for 60-s scans had average positive biases of 28.3% and 4.4%, compared with the reference.

CONCLUSION

SUVmax was variable and overestimated as the scan time decreased and the sphere size increased. In contrast, SUVpeak was a more robust and accurate metric than SUVmax. The measurements of SUVpeak (or SUVpeak normalized to lean body mass) in addition to SUVmax are desirable for reproducible and accurate quantification in clinical situations.

Prospective, longitudinal, multi-modal functional imaging for radical chemo-IMRT treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: the INSIGHT study

BACKGROUND

Radical chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is an effective organ-sparing treatment option for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). Despite advances in treatment for LAHNC, a significant minority of these patients continue to fail to achieve complete response with standard CRT. By constructing a multi-modality functional imaging (FI) predictive biomarker for CRT outcome for patients with LAHNC we hope to be able to reliably identify those patients at high risk of failing standard CRT. Such a biomarker would in future enable CRT to be tailored to the specific biological characteristics of each patients' tumour, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN

The INSIGHT study is a single-centre, prospective, longitudinal multi-modality imaging study using functional MRI and FDG-PET/CT for patients with LAHNC squamous cell carcinomas receiving radical CRT. Two cohorts of patients are being recruited: one treated with, and another treated without, induction chemotherapy. All patients receive radical intensity modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Patients undergo functional imaging before, during and 3 months after completion of radiotherapy, as well as at the time of relapse, should that occur within the first two years after treatment. Serum samples are collected from patients at the same time points as the FI scans for analysis of a panel of serum markers of tumour hypoxia.

DISCUSSION

The primary aim of the INSIGHT study is to acquire a prospective multi-parametric longitudinal data set comprising functional MRI, FDG PET/CT, and serum biomarker data from patients with LAHNC undergoing primary radical CRT. This data set will be used to construct a predictive imaging biomarker for outcome after CRT for LAHNC. This predictive imaging biomarker will be used in future studies of functional imaging based treatment stratification for patients with LAHNC. Additional objectives are: defining the reproducibility of FI parameters; determining robust methods for defining FI based biological target volumes for IMRT planning; creation of a searchable database of functional imaging data for data mining. The INSIGHT study will help to establish the role of FI in the clinical management of LAHNC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCRI H&N CSG ID 13860.

Correction for FDG PET dose extravasations: Monte Carlo validation and quantitative evaluation of patient studies

PURPOSE

Current procedure guidelines for whole body [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) state that studies with visible dose extravasations should be rejected for quantification protocols. Our work is focused on the development and validation of methods for estimating extravasated doses in order to correct standard uptake value (SUV) values for this effect in clinical routine.

METHODS

One thousand three hundred sixty-seven consecutive whole body FDG-PET studies were visually inspected looking for extravasation cases. Two methods for estimating the extravasated dose were proposed and validated in different scenarios using Monte Carlo simulations. All visible extravasations were retrospectively evaluated using a manual ROI based method. In addition, the 50 patients with higher extravasated doses were also evaluated using a threshold-based method.

RESULTS

Simulation studies showed that the proposed methods for estimating extravasated doses allow us to compensate the impact of extravasations on SUV values with an error below 5%. The quantitative evaluation of patient studies revealed that paravenous injection is a relatively frequent effect (18%) with a small fraction of patients presenting considerable extravasations ranging from 1% to a maximum of 22% of the injected dose. A criterion based on the extravasated volume and maximum concentration was established in order to identify this fraction of patients that might be corrected for paravenous injection effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors propose the use of a manual ROI based method for estimating the effectively administered FDG dose and then correct SUV quantification in those patients fulfilling the proposed criterion.

Impact of flexible body surface coil and patient table on PET quantification and image quality in integrated PET/MR

AIM

The surface coils of the Biograph mMR integrated PET/MR system were optimised for PET, but are otherwise unaccounted for. The patient table is still more massive than those of PET/CT devices. The goal was to assess those hardware effects on quantification, count statistics, image quality and scan time both with phantoms and in patients and to investigate their clinical relevance.

PATIENTS, MATERIAL, METHODS

PET phantom data were acquired with and without the patient table. Image noise was expressed as relative standard deviation and compared to a state-of-the-art PET/CT scanner. Protocols of the phantom/patient study regarding the surface coils were similar. Thoraces/abdomens of 11 patients were scanned with and without a coil (1 BP, 4 min). Mean uptake and standard deviation in a cubical VOI were derived and expressed as SUV.

RESULTS

The patient table reduced the number of true coincidences (trues) by 19% (PET/MR) and by 11% (PET/CT). The scan duration for the mMR had to be increased by approximately 30% to achieve a noise level comparable to that of the PET/CT. Decreased SUVs with coil observed in the phantom were confirmed by the patient study. By removing the coil, the mean liver SUV increased by (6 ± 2)%. With (+3 ± 14)%, the average change was similar in lesions, but exceeded 20% in almost one fifth of them. The number of trues grew by (6 ± 1)% for the patients and by 7% for the phantom.

CONCLUSION

Due to the additional attenuation caused by MR hardware, PET scan durations would have to be increased compared to current PET/CTs to provide similar image noise levels. The effect of the coils is mostly in the order of statistical fluctuations. In tumour lesions, it is more pronounced and shows a larger variability. Therefore, coils should be included in the attenuation correction to ensure accurate quantification and thus comparability across PET/MR and PET/CT scanners and within patient populations.

PET quantification with a histogram derived total activity metric: superior quantitative consistency compared to total lesion glycolysis with absolute or relative SUV thresholds in phantoms and lung cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

The increasing use of molecular imaging probes as biomarkers in oncology emphasizes the need for robust and stable methods for quantifying tracer uptake in PET imaging. The primary motivation for this research was to find an accurate method to quantify the total tumor uptake. Therefore we developed a histogram-based method to calculate the background subtracted lesion (BSL) activity and validated BSL by comparing the quantitative consistency with the total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in phantom and patient studies.

METHODS

A thorax phantom and a PET-ACR quality assurance phantom were scanned with increasing FDG concentrations. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed over each chamber. TLG was calculated with a fixed threshold at SUV 2.5 (TLG2.5) and a relative threshold at 42% of SUVmax (TLG42%). The histogram for each VOI was built and BSL was calculated. Comparison with the total injected FDG activity (TIA) was performed using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) and the slope (a). Fifty consecutive patients with FDG-avid lung tumors were selected under an IRB waiver. TLG42%, TLG2.5 and BSL were compared to the reference standard calculating CCC and the slope.

RESULTS

In both phantoms, the CCC for lesions with a TIA ≤50ml*SUV between TIA and BSL was higher and the slope closer to 1 (CCC=0.933, a=1.189), than for TLG42% (CCC=0.350, a=0.731) or TLG2.5 (CCC=0.761, a=0.727). In 50 lung lesions BSL had a slope closer to 1 compared to the reference activity than TLG42% (a=1.084 vs 0.618 - for high activity lesions) and also closer to 1 than TLG2.5 (a=1.117 vs 0.548 - for low activity lesions).

CONCLUSION

The histogram based BSL correlated better with TIA in both phantom studies than TLG2.5 or TLG42%. Also in lung tumors, the BSL activity is overall more accurate in quantifying the lesion activity compared to the two most commonly applied TLG quantification methods.

Repeatability of the Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) in FDG PET

Objective: SUV_max is often calculated at FDG PET examinations in systematic studies as well as at clinical examinations. Since SUV_max represents a very small portion of a lesion it may be questioned how statistically reliable the figure is. This was studied by assessing the repeatability of SUV_max between two FDG acquisitions acquired immediately upon each other in patients with chest lesions.

Methods: In 100 clinical patients with a known chest lesion, two identical 3 min PET registrations (PET1 and PET2, respectively) were initiated within 224±31 sec of each other. The difference in SUV_max between the lesion for the two PET scans (ΔSUVmax) was calculated and the uncertainty expressed as the coefficient of variation, CV (%). The correlation between ΔSUV_max and the lowest SUV_max from PET1 or PET2, the approximate metabolic lesion volume, the time from FDG injection to PET1 and the time between PET1 and PET2, respectively, was also assessed.

Results: In 56 patients SUV_max increased at the second acquisition and in 44 patients it decreased. Mean of SUV_max was 7.8±6.1 and 7.8±6.2 for PET1 and PET2, respectively. The mean percentage difference was 0.9±7.8. The difference was not significant (p=0.20). CV gave an uncertainty of 4.3% between the two measurements which is a strong indicator of equivalence. There was no correlation between ΔSUV_max and any of the assessed four parameters. The difference between the acquisitions, 0.9%, was much lower compared to the 3 previous published similar, but more restricted studies where the difference was 2.5-8.2%.

Conclusion: From camera and computational perspectives, SUV_max is a stable parameter

Conflict of interest:None declared.

Tumor quantification in clinical positron emission tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) is used extensively in clinical oncology for tumor detection, staging and therapy response assessment. Quantitative measurements of tumor uptake, usually in the form of standardized uptake values (SUVs), have enhanced or replaced qualitative interpretation. In this paper we review the current status of tumor quantification methods and their applications to clinical oncology. Factors that impede quantitative assessment and limit its accuracy and reproducibility are summarized, with special emphasis on SUV analysis. We describe current efforts to improve the accuracy of tumor uptake measurements, characterize overall metabolic tumor burden and heterogeneity of tumor uptake, and account for the effects of image noise. We also summarize recent developments in PET instrumentation and image reconstruction and their impact on tumor quantification. Finally, we offer our assessment of the current development needs in PET tumor quantification, including practical techniques for fully quantitative, pharmacokinetic measurements.

Noise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value

In tumor response monitoring studies with (18)F-FDG PET, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) is commonly applied as a quantitative metric. Although it has several advantages due to its simplicity of determination, concerns about the influence of image noise on single-pixel SUV(max) persist. In this study, we measured aspects of bias and reproducibility associated with SUV(max) and the closely related peak SUV (SUV(peak)) using real patient data to provide a realistic noise context.

METHODS

List-mode 3-dimensional PET data were acquired for 15 min over a single bed position in twenty (18)F-FDG oncology patients. For each patient, data were sorted so as to form 2 sets of images: respiration-gated images such that each image had statistical quality comparable to a 3 min/bed position scan, and 5 statistically independent (ungated) images of different durations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min). Tumor SUV(max) and SUV(peak) (12-mm-diameter spheric region of interest positioned so as to maximize the enclosed average) were analyzed in terms of reproducibility and bias. The component of reproducibility due to statistical noise (independent of physiologic and other variables) was measured using paired SUVs from 2 comparable respiration-gated images. Bias was measured as a function of scan duration.

RESULTS

Replicate tumor SUV measurements had a within-patient SD of 5.6% ± 0.9% for SUV(max) and 2.5% ± 0.4% for SUV(peak). SUV(max) had average positive biases of 30%, 18%, 12%, 4%, and 5% for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min images, respectively. SUV(peak) was also biased but to a lesser extent: 11%, 8%, 5%, 1%, and 4% for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min images, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of SUV(max) are best exploited when PET images have a high statistical quality. For images with noise properties typically associated with clinical whole-body studies, SUV(peak) provides a slightly more robust alternative for assessing the most metabolically active region of tumor.

PET/MR imaging of bone lesions--implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction

PURPOSE

Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is essential for quantitative analysis of PET tracer distribution. In MR, the lack of cortical bone signal makes bone segmentation difficult and may require implementation of special sequences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the need for accurate bone segmentation in MR-based AC for whole-body PET/MR imaging.

METHODS

In 22 patients undergoing sequential PET/CT and 3-T MR imaging, modified CT AC maps were produced by replacing pixels with values of >100 HU, representing mostly bone structures, by pixels with a constant value of 36 HU corresponding to soft tissue, thereby simulating current MR-derived AC maps. A total of 141 FDG-positive osseous lesions and 50 soft-tissue lesions adjacent to bones were evaluated. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) was measured in each lesion in PET images reconstructed once using the standard AC maps and once using the modified AC maps. Subsequently, the errors in lesion tracer uptake for the modified PET images were calculated using the standard PET image as a reference.

RESULTS

Substitution of bone by soft tissue values in AC maps resulted in an underestimation of tracer uptake in osseous and soft tissue lesions adjacent to bones of 11.2 ± 5.4% (range 1.5-30.8%) and 3.2 ± 1.7% (range 0.2-4%), respectively. Analysis of the spine and pelvic osseous lesions revealed a substantial dependence of the error on lesion composition. For predominantly sclerotic spine lesions, the mean underestimation was 15.9 ± 3.4% (range 9.9-23.5%) and for osteolytic spine lesions, 7.2 ± 1.7% (range 4.9-9.3%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CT data simulating treating bone as soft tissue as is currently done in MR maps for PET AC leads to a substantial underestimation of tracer uptake in bone lesions and depends on lesion composition, the largest error being seen in sclerotic lesions. Therefore, depiction of cortical bone and other calcified areas in MR AC maps is necessary for accurate quantification of tracer uptake values in PET/MR imaging.

Repeatability of FDG quantification in tumor imaging: averaged SUVs are superior to SUVmax

PURPOSE

Reliable 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake quantification is crucial for cancer treatment monitoring. While interobserver variability has been found to be lower for a maximum standard uptake value (SUV)max than for an averaged SUV (SUVmean), the repeatability has not been investigated yet. In this study, we determined the repeatability of SUV values in two sequential measurements 5 min apart.

METHODS

Positron emission tomography data of malignant chest tumors were acquired dynamically during 45 min in 20 patients. SUV values were derived from the hottest (SUVmax), the mean of the 5 (SUV5) and 10 (SUV10) hottest voxels and the mean of a volume of interest (SUVmean). The repeatability of the SUV measurements was determined as the standard deviation of the difference between the values at 40 and 45 min and represented as Bland-Altman graphs.

RESULTS

The standard deviation of the difference between the two sequential scans for SUVmax, SUV5, SUV10 and SUVmean was 1.01, 0.53, 0.37 and 0.28.

CONCLUSION

The repeatability of SUV is markedly increased by deriving the value from multiple voxels. Compared to SUVmax, the variability in SUV measurements is reduced by a factor of 2.7 (2.7=1.01/0.37) if 10 voxels are pooled.