• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4698324)   Today's Articles (4363)
For: Hernandez AM, Seibert JA, Boone JM. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered. Med Phys 2016;42:6337-48. [PMID: 26520725 DOI: 10.1118/1.4931966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Loveland J, Mackenzie A. Comparison of AAPM TG282 and Dance breast dosimetry models: Impact on estimates of average MGD for the United Kingdom breast screening programmes. Phys Med 2025;130:104908. [PMID: 39842322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2024] [Revised: 12/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]  Open
2
Wu X, Duan X, Huang H, Zhao W. Scatter correction for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis with a dual-layer detector. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2025;12:S13008. [PMID: 39640536 PMCID: PMC11615639 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.12.s1.s13008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]  Open
3
Loveland J, Mackenzie A. Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programmes 2019-2023. Br J Radiol 2024;97:787-793. [PMID: 38291906 PMCID: PMC11027334 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]  Open
4
Wang J, Liu Y, Hu A, Wu Z, Zhang H, Li J, Qiu R. THUBreast: an open-source breast phantom generation software for x-ray imaging and dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2024;69:065004. [PMID: 38346343 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad2881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
5
Massera RT, Tomal A, Thomson RM. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales. Med Phys 2024;51:1105-1116. [PMID: 38156766 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]  Open
6
Massera RT, Tomal A, Thomson RM. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part II - Microscopic scales. Med Phys 2024;51:1117-1126. [PMID: 38146824 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]  Open
7
Sechopoulos I, Dance DR, Boone JM, Bosmans HT, Caballo M, Diaz O, van Engen R, Fedon C, Glick SJ, Hernandez AM, Hill ML, Hulme KW, Longo R, Rabin C, Sanderink WBG, Seibert JA. Joint AAPM Task Group 282/EFOMP Working Group Report: Breast dosimetry for standard and contrast-enhanced mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys 2024;51:712-739. [PMID: 38018710 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]  Open
8
Tseng HW, Karellas A, Vedantham S. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients. Med Phys 2023;50:1406-1417. [PMID: 36427332 PMCID: PMC10207937 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]  Open
9
ALMisned G, Elshami W, Kilic G, Rabaa E, Zakaly HMH, Ene A, Tekin HO. Utilization of three-layers heterogeneous mammographic phantom through MCNPX code for breast and chest radiation dose levels at different diagnostic X-ray energies: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Front Public Health 2023;11:1136864. [PMID: 36935709 PMCID: PMC10022908 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1136864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]  Open
10
Pautasso JJ, Caballo M, Mikerov M, Boone JM, Michielsen K, Sechopoulos I. Deep learning for x-ray scatter correction in dedicated breast CT. Med Phys 2022;50:2022-2036. [PMID: 36565012 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]  Open
11
Physical and digital phantoms for 2D and 3D x-ray breast imaging: Review on the state-of-the-art and future prospects. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
12
Marshall NW, Bosmans H. Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis systems: physical methods and experimental data. Phys Med Biol 2022;67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9a35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
13
Martí Villarreal OA, Velasco FG, Fausto AMF, Milian FM, Mol AW, Capizzi KR, Ambrosio P. Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography for diverse glandularities using the contrast-detail metric. Phys Med 2022;101:112-119. [PMID: 35988481 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]  Open
14
Loveland J, Young KC, Oduko JM, Mackenzie A. Radiation doses in the United Kingdom breast screening programmes 2016-2019. Br J Radiol 2022;95:20211400. [PMID: 35604717 PMCID: PMC10996325 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
15
Caballo M, Rabin C, Fedon C, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Diaz O, Boone JM, Dance DR, Sechopoulos I. Patient-derived heterogeneous breast phantoms for advanced dosimetry in mammography and tomosynthesis. Med Phys 2022;49:5423-5438. [PMID: 35635844 PMCID: PMC9546119 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]  Open
16
Sarno A, Mettivier G, Bliznakova K, Hernandez AM, Boone JM, Russo P. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms. Phys Med 2022;97:50-58. [PMID: 35395535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
17
GATE/GEANT4 simulation of radiation risk induced cancer from mammographic screening. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
18
X-ray dosimetry in breast cancer screening: 2D and 3D mammography. Eur J Radiol 2022;151:110278. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
19
Ghazi P, Youssefian S, Ghazi T. A novel hardware duo of beam modulation and shielding to reduce scatter acquisition and dose in cone-beam breast CT. Med Phys 2021;49:169-185. [PMID: 34825715 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]  Open
20
Mainprize JG. To Use Tomosynthesis or Not in the Augmented Breast? JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021;3:701-702. [PMID: 38424934 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
21
Massera RT, Thomson RM, Tomal A. Technical note: MC-GPU breast dosimetry validations with other Monte Carlo codes and phase space file implementation. Med Phys 2021;49:244-253. [PMID: 34778988 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]  Open
22
Ishii M, Nakamura M, Ishii R, Shida K, Hatada T, Murakami N, Maeda M, Okamoto R, Shinohara S, Araki F, Higashida Y. Effect of Compression Force and Target or Target/Filter Combination on Mean Glandular Dose for Japanese Women in Full-Field Digital Mammography System. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS 2021. [DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2021.3862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
23
Massera RT, Fernández-Varea JM, Tomal A. Impact of photoelectric cross section data on systematic uncertainties for Monte Carlo breast dosimetry in mammography. Phys Med Biol 2021;66. [PMID: 33857930 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
24
Massera RT, Tomal A. Breast glandularity and mean glandular dose assessment using a deep learning framework: Virtual patients study. Phys Med 2021;83:264-277. [PMID: 33984580 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]  Open
25
Lesion Detectability and Radiation Dose in Spiral Breast CT With Photon-Counting Detector Technology: A Phantom Study. Invest Radiol 2021;55:515-523. [PMID: 32209815 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
26
Teuwen J, Moriakov N, Fedon C, Caballo M, Reiser I, Bakic P, García E, Diaz O, Michielsen K, Sechopoulos I. Deep learning reconstruction of digital breast tomosynthesis images for accurate breast density and patient-specific radiation dose estimation. Med Image Anal 2021;71:102061. [PMID: 33910108 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
27
Sarno A, Mettivier G, di Franco F, Varallo A, Bliznakova K, Hernandez AM, Boone JM, Russo P. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography. Med Phys 2021;48:2682-2693. [PMID: 33683711 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]  Open
28
Fedon C, Caballo M, García E, Diaz O, Boone JM, Dance DR, Sechopoulos I. Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma. Med Phys 2021;48:1436-1447. [PMID: 33452822 PMCID: PMC7986202 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]  Open
29
Evaluation of glandular dose in mammography in presence of breast cysts using Monte Carlo simulation. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING 2021. [DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
30
Shinohara S, Araki F, Maeda M, Okamoto R, Nakamura M, Higashida Y. Indices for the evaluation of glandular dose heterogeneity in full-field digital mammography. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020;40:1429-1443. [PMID: 33120368 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abc604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
31
Mammography dose estimates do not reflect any specific patient's breast dose. Eur J Radiol 2020;131:109216. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
32
di Franco F, Sarno A, Mettivier G, Hernandez A, Bliznakova K, Boone J, Russo P. GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations for virtual clinical trials in breast X-ray imaging: Proof of concept. Phys Med 2020;74:133-142. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]  Open
33
Trevisan Massera R, Tomal A. Estimation of glandular dose in mammography based on artificial neural networks. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020;65:095009. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7a6d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
34
Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography. Med Phys 2020;47:1340-1348. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]  Open
35
Chang TY, Lai KJ, Tu CY, Wu J. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography. Sci Rep 2020;10:2234. [PMID: 32042071 PMCID: PMC7010737 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]  Open
36
Liu YL, Chang SJ, Lin FY, Chang TY, Wu J. Suborgan breast dosimetry for breast nuclear medicine imaging using anthropomorphic software breast phantoms. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
37
Characterization and applicability of low-density materials for making 3D physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
38
Ghazi P, Hernandez AM, Abbey C, Yang K, Boone JM. Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach. Med Phys 2019;46:3414-3430. [PMID: 31102462 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]  Open
39
Sarno A, Tucciariello RM, Mettivier G, di Franco F, Russo P. Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019;64:125012. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab253f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
40
Santos JC, Tomal A, de Barros N, Costa PR. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019;64:105010. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab171a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
41
Hernandez AM, Becker AE, Boone JM. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgNCT) using patient-derived breast shapes and heterogeneous fibroglandular distributions. Med Phys 2019;46:1455-1466. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]  Open
42
Oliver PAK, Thomson RM. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys 2019;46:1426-1436. [PMID: 30657190 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]  Open
43
Fedon C, Rabin C, Caballo M, Diaz O, García E, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, González-Sprinberg GA, Sechopoulos I. Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys Med Biol 2018;64:015003. [PMID: 30524034 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
44
Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT. Phys Med 2018;55:142-148. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]  Open
45
Massera RT, Tomal A. Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography. Phys Med 2018;51:38-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]  Open
46
Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography. Phys Med 2018;51:56-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]  Open
47
Sarno A, Mettivier G, Tucciariello RM, Bliznakova K, Boone JM, Sechopoulos I, Di Lillo F, Russo P. Monte Carlo evaluation of glandular dose in cone-beam X-ray computed tomography dedicated to the breast: Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast models. Phys Med 2018;51:99-107. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]  Open
48
Fedon C, Caballo M, Sechopoulos I. Internal breast dosimetry in mammography: Monte Carlo validation in homogeneous and anthropomorphic breast phantoms with a clinical mammography system. Med Phys 2018;45:3950-3961. [PMID: 29956334 PMCID: PMC6099211 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]  Open
49
Fedon C, Caballo M, Longo R, Trianni A, Sechopoulos I. Internal breast dosimetry in mammography: Experimental methods and Monte Carlo validation with a monoenergetic x-ray beam. Med Phys 2018;45:1724-1737. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]  Open
50
Sarno A, Mettivier G, Lillo FD, Bliznakova K, Sechopoulos I, Russo P. Abstract ID: 203 Breast model validation for Monte Carlo evaluation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography. Phys Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]  Open
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA