Online 3D EPID-based dose verification: Proof of concept

Preliminary application of EPID three-dimensional dose reconstruction in in vivo dose verification of breast cancer intensity-modulated radiation therapy

A preliminary study was conducted using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) based dose verification in pre-treatment and in vivo dose reconstruction modes for breast cancer intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique with known repositioning set-up errors. For 43 IMRT plans, the set-up errors were determined from 43 sets of EPID images and 258 sets of cone beam computed tomography images. In-house developed Edose software was used to reconstruct the dose distribution using the pre-treatment and on-treatment (in vivo) EPID acquired fluence maps. The maximum setup error was < 3.5 mm. For 43 pre-treatment cases, the γ pass rate (3 %/3 mm) is 98.49 % ± 1.15 %. The chest wall target ΔV98%P, ΔV95%P, andΔV90%P are all < 5 %, while the majority of the ipsilateral lung ΔV5Gy, ΔV20Gy, and ΔV30Gy are also < 5 %. For 258 in vivo cases, the γ pass rate is 90.98 % ± 6.53 %, with the chest wall target ΔV90%P and ipsilateral lung ΔV30Gy both < 5 %, while the other volume differences all exceed 5 %. The γ pass rate for in vivo verification is significantly lower than pre-treatment values. Although the in vivo γ verification satisfies the medical physics requirements, the reconstructed coverage of the chest wall target is far below the clinical dosimetry requirements. In vivo 3D dose reconstruction directly predicts changes in the planning target volume to aid clinicians better understand the actual dose received by patients with intra-fractional motion and anatomical changes.

AAPM Task Group Report 307: Use of EPIDs for Patient-Specific IMRT and VMAT QA

PURPOSE

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been widely utilized for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) and their use for transit dosimetry applications is emerging. Yet there are no specific guidelines on the potential uses, limitations, and correct utilization of EPIDs for these purposes. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 307 (TG-307) provides a comprehensive review of the physics, modeling, algorithms and clinical experience with EPID-based pre-treatment and transit dosimetry techniques. This review also includes the limitations and challenges in the clinical implementation of EPIDs, including recommendations for commissioning, calibration and validation, routine QA, tolerance levels for gamma analysis and risk-based analysis.

METHODS

Characteristics of the currently available EPID systems and EPID-based PSQA techniques are reviewed. The details of the physics, modeling, and algorithms for both pre-treatment and transit dosimetry methods are discussed, including clinical experience with different EPID dosimetry systems. Commissioning, calibration, and validation, tolerance levels and recommended tests, are reviewed, and analyzed. Risk-based analysis for EPID dosimetry is also addressed.

RESULTS

Clinical experience, commissioning methods and tolerances for EPID-based PSQA system are described for pre-treatment and transit dosimetry applications. The sensitivity, specificity, and clinical results for EPID dosimetry techniques are presented as well as examples of patient-related and machine-related error detection by these dosimetry solutions. Limitations and challenges in clinical implementation of EPIDs for dosimetric purposes are discussed and acceptance and rejection criteria are outlined. Potential causes of and evaluations of pre-treatment and transit dosimetry failures are discussed. Guidelines and recommendations developed in this report are based on the extensive published data on EPID QA along with the clinical experience of the TG-307 members.

CONCLUSION

TG-307 focused on the commercially available EPID-based dosimetric tools and provides guidance for medical physicists in the clinical implementation of EPID-based patient-specific pre-treatment and transit dosimetry QA solutions including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments.

Characterization of a commercial EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry and its feasibility and implementation for treatment verification in Malaysia

Introduction: In vivo dosimetry verification is currently a necessity in radiotherapy centres in Europe countries as one of the tools for patient-specific QA, and now its demand is currently rising in developed countries, such as Malaysia. The aim of this study is to characterize commercial EPID-based dosimetry and its implementation for radiotherapy treatment verification in Malaysia.

Materials and Methods: In this work, the sensitivity and performance of a commercially available in vivo dosimetry system, EPIgray® (DOSIsoft, Cachan, France), were qualitatively evaluated prior to its use at our centre. EPIgray response to dose linearity, field size, off-axis, position, and angle dependency tests were performed against TPS calculated dose for 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams. Relative deviations of the total dose were evaluated at isocentre and different depths in the water. EPIgray measured dose was validated by using IMRT and VMAT prostate plan. All calculation points were at the beam isocentre and at points suggested by TG-119 with accepted tolerance of ±10% dose threshold.

Results: EPIgray reported good agreement for linearity, field size, off-axis, and position dependency with TPS dose, being within 5% tolerance for both energy ranges. The average deviation was less than ±2% and ±7% in 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams, respectively, for the angle dependency test. A clinical evaluation performed for the IMRT prostate plan gave average agreement within ±3% at the plan isocentre for both energies. While for the VMAT plan, 95% and 100% of all points created lie below ±5% for 6 MV and 10 MV photon beam energy, respectively.

Conclusion: In summary, based on the results of preliminary characterization, EPID-based dosimetry is believed as an important tool and beneficial to be implemented for IMRT/VMAT plans verification in Malaysia, especially for in vivo verification, alongside existing pre-treatment verification.

A recurrent neural network for rapid detection of delivery errors during real-time portal dosimetry

Background and purpose

Real-time portal dosimetry compares measured images with predicted images to detect delivery errors as the radiotherapy treatment proceeds. This work aimed to investigate the performance of a recurrent neural network for processing image metrics so as to detect delivery errors as early as possible in the treatment.

Materials and methods

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans of six prostate patients were used to generate sequences of predicted portal images. Errors were introduced into the treatment plans and the modified plans were delivered to a water-equivalent phantom. Four different metrics were used to detect errors. These metrics were applied to a threshold-based method to detect the errors as soon as possible during the delivery, and also to a recurrent neural network consisting of four layers. A leave-two-out approach was used to set thresholds and train the neural network then test the resulting systems.

Results

When using a combination of metrics in conjunction with optimal thresholds, the median segment index at which the errors were detected was 107 out of 180. When using the neural network, the median segment index for error detection was 66 out of 180, with no false positives. The neural network reduced the rate of false negative results from 0.36 to 0.24.

Conclusions

The recurrent neural network allowed the detection of errors around 30% earlier than when using conventional threshold techniques. By appropriate training of the network, false positive alerts could be prevented, thereby avoiding unnecessary disruption to the patient workflow.

Assessing the accuracy of electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based dosimetry: II. Evaluation of a dosimetric uncertainty budget and development of a new film-in-EPID absorbed dose calibration methodology

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to reduce the uncertainty associated with determining dose-to-water using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging detector (EPID) under reference conditions by developing a direct calibration formalism based on radiochromic film measurements made within the EPID panel and detailed Monte Carlo simulations. To our knowledge, this is the first EPID-based dosimetry study reporting an uncertainty budget .

METHODS

Pixel sensitivity and relative off-axis response was mapped by simultaneously irradiating film contained within the imager panel and acquiring an EPID image set. The detector panel was disassembled for the purpose of modeling the EPID in detail using the EGSnrc DOSXYZnrc usercode, which was in turn used to calculate dose-to-film in EPID to dose-to-water in water conversion factors .

RESULTS

A direct comparison of the two correction methodologies investigated in this work, the previously established empirical method and the proposed simultaneous measurement approach involving in-EPID film dosimetry, produced an agreement with an RMS deviation of 1.4 % overall. A combined standard relative uncertainty of 3.3 % (k = 1) was estimated for the determination of absorbed dose to water at the position of the EPID using the proposed calibration methodology .

CONCLUSIONS

This work describes a direct method of calibrating EPID response in terms of absorbed dose to water requiring fewer measurements than other empirical approaches, and without 2D spatial interpolation of correction factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of Daily CT for EPID-Based Transit In Vivo Dosimetry

Purpose

The difference in anatomical structure and positioning between planning and treatment may lead to bias in electronic portal image device (EPID)-based in vivo dosimetry calculations. The purpose of this study was to use daily CT instead of planning CT as a reference for EPID-based in vivo dosimetry calculations and to analyze the necessity of using daily CT for EPID-based in vivo dosimetry calculations in terms of patient quality assurance.

Materials and Methods

Twenty patients were enrolled in this study. The study design included eight different sites (the cervical, nasopharyngeal, and oral cavities, rectum, prostate, bladder, lung, and esophagus). All treatments were delivered with a CT-linac 506c (UIH, Shanghai) using 6 MV photon beams. This machine is equipped with diagnosis-level fan-beam CT and an amorphous silicon EPID XRD1642 (Varex Imaging Corporation, UT, USA). A Monte Carlo algorithm was developed to calculate the transmit EPID image. A pretreatment measurement was performed to assess system accuracy by delivering based on a homogeneous phantom (RW3 slab, PTW, Freiburg). During treatment, each patient underwent CT scanning before delivery either once or twice for a total of 268 fractions obtained daily CT images. Patients may have had a position correction that followed our image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) procedure. Meanwhile, transmit EPID images were acquired for each field during delivery. After treatment, all patient CTs were reviewed to ensure that there was no large anatomical change between planning and treatment. The reference of transmit EPID images was calculated based on both planning and daily CTs, and the IGRT correction was corrected for the EPID calculation. The gamma passing rate (3 mm 3%, 2 mm 3%, and 2 mm 2%) was calculated and compared between the planning CT and daily CT. Mechanical errors [ ± 1 mm, ± 2 mm, ± 5 mm multileaf collimator (MLC) systematic shift and 3%, 5% monitor unit (MU) scaling] were also introduced in this study for comparing detectability between both types of CT.

Result

The average (standard deviation) gamma passing rate (3 mm 3%, 2 mm 3%, and 2 mm 2%) in the RW3 slab phantom was 99.6% ± 1.0%, 98.9% ± 2.1%, and 97.2% ± 3.9%. For patient measurement, the average (standard deviation) gamma passing rates were 87.8% ± 14.0%, 82.2% ± 16.9%, and 74.2% ± 18.9% for using planning CTs as reference and 93.6% ± 8.2%, 89.7% ± 11.0%, and 82.8% ± 14.7% for using daily CTs as reference. There were significant differences between the planning CT and daily CT results. All p-values (Mann–Whitney test) were less than 0.001. In terms of error simulation, nonparametric test shows that there were significant differences between practical daily results and error simulation results (p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the detectability of mechanical delivery error using daily CT was better than that of planning CT. AUC_{Daily CT} = 0.63–0.96 and AUC_{Planning CT} = 0.49–0.93 in MLC systematic shift and AUC_{Daily CT} = 0.56–0.82 and AUC_{Planning CT} = 0.45–0.73 in MU scaling.

Conclusion

This study shows the feasibility and effectiveness of using two-dimensional (2D) EPID portal image and daily CT-based in vivo dosimetry for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) verification during treatment. The daily CT-based in vivo dosimetry has better sensitivity and specificity to identify the variation of IMRT in MLC-related and dose-related errors than planning CT-based.

Optimisation of a composite difference metric for prompt error detection in real-time portal dosimetry of simulated volumetric modulated arc therapy

OBJECTIVES

In real-time portal dosimetry, thresholds are set for several measures of difference between predicted and measured images, and signals larger than those thresholds signify an error. The aim of this work is to investigate the use of an additional composite difference metric (CDM) for earlier detection of errors.

METHODS

Portal images were predicted for the volumetric modulated arc therapy plans of six prostate patients. Errors in monitor units, aperture opening, aperture position and path length were deliberately introduced into all 180 segments of the treatment plans, and these plans were delivered to a water-equivalent phantom. Four different metrics, consisting of central axis signal, mean image value and two image difference measures, were used to identify errors, and a CDM was added, consisting of a weighted power sum of the individual metrics. To optimise the weights of the CDM and to evaluate the resulting timeliness of error detection, a leave-pair-out strategy was used. For each combination of four patients, the weights of the CDM were determined by an exhaustive search, and the result was evaluated on the remaining two patients.

RESULTS

The median segment index at which the errors were identified was 87 (range 40-130) when using all of the individual metrics separately. Using a CDM as well as multiple separate metrics reduced this to 73 (35-95). The median weighting factors of the four metrics constituting the composite were (0.15, 0.10, 0.15, 0.00). Due to selection of suitable threshold levels, there was only one false positive result in the six patients.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that, in conjunction with appropriate error thresholds, use of a CDM is able to identify increased image differences around 20% earlier than the separate measures.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study shows the value of combining difference metrics to allow earlier detection of errors during real-time portal dosimetry for volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment.

In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice

External beam radiotherapy with photon beams is a highly accurate treatment modality, but requires extensive quality assurance programs to confirm that radiation therapy will be or was administered appropriately. In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is an essential element of modern radiation therapy because it provides the ability to catch treatment delivery errors, assist in treatment adaptation, and record the actual dose delivered to the patient. However, for various reasons, its clinical implementation has been slow and limited. The purpose of this report is to stimulate the wider use of IVD for external beam radiotherapy, and in particular of systems using electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). After documenting the current IVD methods, this report provides detailed software, hardware and system requirements for in vivo EPID dosimetry systems in order to help in bridging the current vendor-user gap. The report also outlines directions for further development and research. In vivo EPID dosimetry vendors, in collaboration with users across multiple institutions, are requested to improve the understanding and reduce the uncertainties of the system and to help in the determination of optimal action limits for error detection. Finally, the report recommends that automation of all aspects of IVD is needed to help facilitate clinical adoption, including automation of image acquisition, analysis, result interpretation, and reporting/documentation. With the guidance of this report, it is hoped that widespread clinical use of IVD will be significantly accelerated.

Estimating dose delivery accuracy in stereotactic body radiation therapy: A review of in-vivo measurement methods

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been recognized as a standard treatment option for many anatomical sites. Sophisticated radiation therapy techniques have been developed for carrying out these treatments and new quality assurance (QA) programs are therefore required to guarantee high geometrical and dosimetric accuracy. This paper focuses on recent advances on in-vivo measurements methods (IVM) for SBRT treatment. More specifically, all of the online QA methods for estimating the effective dose delivered to patients were compared. Determining the optimal IVM for performing SBRT treatments would reduce the risk of errors that could jeopardize treatment outcome. A total of 89 papers were included. The papers were subdivided into the following topics: point dosimeters (PD), transmission detectors (TD), log file analysis (LFA), electronic portal imaging device dosimetry (EPID), dose accumulation methods (DAM). The detectability capability of the main IVM detectors/devices were evaluated. All of the systems have some limitations: PD has no spatial data, EPID has limited sensitivity towards set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in some anatomical sites, TD is insensitive towards patient related errors, LFA is not an independent measure, DAMs are not always based on measures. In order to minimize errors in SBRT dose delivery, we recommend using synergic combinations of two or more of the systems described in our review: on-line tumor position and patient information should be combined with MLC position and linac output detection accuracy. In this way the effects of SBRT dose delivery errors will be reduced.

3D dosimetric verification of unity MR-linac treatments by portal dosimetry

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

3D dosimetric verification of online adaptive workflows is essential as their complexity is unprecedented in radiation oncology. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of back-projection portal dosimetry for 3D dosimetric verification of Unity MR-linac treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An earlier presented 2D back-projection algorithm for the Unity MR-linac geometry was extended for 3D dose reconstruction and comparison against planned dose distributions. 'In-air' as well as in-vivo portal EPID images can be used as input. The method was validated using data from treatments of 5 patients (2 rectal, 2 prostate cancer and one oligo metastasis). 3D pre-treatment verification of the reference plan using 'in-air' EPID images was performed and compared against measured (with the Octavius 4D system) and planned (in the planning CT) dose distributions. In-vivo EPID dose distributions were compared to the TPS for the first three adaptations of all treatments. For all comparisons, dose difference values at the reference point and γ-parameters were reported.

RESULTS

The comparison against the OCTAVIUS 4D system (3%, 2 mm, local) showed y-mean = 0.52 ± 0.10 and y-passrate = 91.9%, 95% CI [85.4, 98.4], and ΔD_RP = -0.1 ± 1.1%. Pre-treatment verification against TPS data (3%, 2 mm, global) showed y-mean = 0.52 ± 0.04, y-passrate = 93.5%, 95% CI [92.4, 94.6] and ΔD_RP = -0.9 ± 1.5%. The averaged y-results for the in-vivo 3D verification were y-mean = 0.52 ± 0.05, y-passrate = 92.5%, 95% CI [90.2, 94.8] and ΔD_RP = 0.8 ± 2.1%.

CONCLUSION

3D dosimetric verification of Unity MR-linac treatments using portal dosimetry is feasible, pre-treatment as well as in-vivo.

The effect of the choice of patient model on the performance of in vivo 3D EPID dosimetry to detect variations in patient position and anatomy

PURPOSE

In vivo EPID dosimetry is meant to trigger on relevant differences between delivered and planned dose distributions and should therefore be sensitive to changes in patient position and patient anatomy. Three-dimensional (3D) EPID back-projection algorithms can use either the planning computed tomography (CT) or the daily patient anatomy as patient model for dose reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to quantify the effect of the choice of patient model on the performance of in vivo 3D EPID dosimetry to detect patient-related variations.

METHODS

Variations in patient position and patient anatomy were simulated by transforming the reference planning CT images (pCT) into synthetic daily CT images (dCT) representing a variation of a given magnitude in patient position or in patient anatomy. For each variation, synthetic in vivo EPID data were also generated to simulate the reconstruction of in vivo EPID dose distributions. Both the planning CT images and the synthetic daily CT images could be used as patient model in the reconstructions yielding e D pCT and e D dCT EPID reconstructed dose distributions respectively. The accuracy of e D pCT and e D dCT reconstructions was evaluated against absolute dose measurements made in different phantom setups, and against dose distributions calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The comparison was performed by γ-analysis (3% local dose/2 mm). The difference in sensitivity between e D pCT and e D dCT reconstructions to detect variations in patient position and in patient anatomy was investigated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and the number of triggered alerts for 100 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans and 12 variations.

RESULTS

e D dCT showed good agreement with both absolute point dose measurements (<0.5%) and TPS data (γ-mean = 0.52 ± 0.11). The agreement degraded with e D pCT , with the magnitude of the deviation varying with each specific case. e D dCT readily detected combined 3 mm translation setup errors in all directions (AUC = 1.0) and combined 3° rotation setup errors around all axes (AUC = 0.86) whereas e D pCT showed good detectability only for 12 mm translations (AUC = 0.85) and 9° rotations (AUC = 0.80). Conversely, e D pCT manifested a higher sensitivity to patient anatomical changes resulting in AUC values of 0.92/0.95 for a 6 mm patient contour expansion/contraction compared to 0.70/0.64 with e D dCT . Using |ΔPTV_D50 | > 3% as clinical tolerance level, the percentage of alerts for 6 mm changes in patient contour were 85%/27% with e D pCT / e D dCT .

CONCLUSIONS

With planning CT images as patient model, EPID dose reconstructions underestimate the dosimetric effects caused by errors in patient positioning and overestimate the dosimetric effects caused by changes in patient anatomy. The use of the daily patient position and anatomy as patient model for in vivo 3D EPID transit dosimetry improves the ability of the system to detect uncorrected errors in patient position and it reduces the likelihood of false positives due to patient anatomical changes.

A method to verify sections of arc during intrafraction portal dosimetry for prostate VMAT

This study investigates the use of a running sum of images during segment-resolved intrafraction portal dosimetry for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), so as to alert the operator to an error before it becomes irremediable. At the time of treatment planning, predicted portal images were created for each segment of the VMAT arc, and at the time of delivery, intrafraction monitoring software polled the portal imager to read new images as they became available. The predicted and measured images were compared and displayed on a segment basis. In particular, a running sum of images from ten segments (a 'section') was investigated, with mean absolute difference between predicted and measured images being quantified. Images for 13 prostate patients were used to identify appropriate tolerance values for this statistic. Errors in monitor units of 2%-10%, field size of 2-10 mm, field position of 2-10 mm and path length of 10-50 mm were deliberately introduced into the treatment plans and delivered to a water-equivalent phantom and the sensitivity of the method to these errors was investigated. Gross errors were also considered for one case. The patient images show considerable variability from segment to segment, but when using a section of the arc the variability is reduced, so that the maximum value of mean absolute difference between predicted and measured images is reduced to below 12%, after excluding the first 10% of segments. This tolerance level is also found to be applicable for delivery of the plans to a water-equivalent phantom. Using this as a tolerance level for the error plans, a 10% increase in monitor units is detected, 4 mm increase or shift in multileaf collimator settings can be detected, and an air gap of dimensions 40 mm  ×  50 mm is detected. Gross errors can also be detected instantly after the first 10% of segments. The running difference between predicted and measured images over ten segments is able to identify errors at specific regions of the arc, as well as in the overall treatment.

Evaluating the sensitivity of Halcyon's automatic transit image acquisition for treatment error detection: A phantom study using static IMRT

PURPOSE

The Varian Halcyon™ electronic portal imaging detector is always in-line with the beam and automatically acquires transit images for every patient with full-field coverage. These images could be used for "every patient, every monitor unit" quality assurance (QA) and eventually adaptive radiotherapy. This study evaluated the imager's sensitivity to potential clinical errors and day-to-day variations from clinical exit images.

METHODS

Open and modulated fields were delivered for each potential error. To evaluate output changes, monitor units were scaled by 2%-10% and delivered to solid water slabs and a homogeneous CIRS phantom. To mimic weight changes, 0.5-5.0 cm of buildup was added to the solid water. To evaluate positioning changes, a homogeneous and heterogeneous CIRS phantom were shifted 2-10 cm and 0.2-1.5 cm, respectively. For each test, mean relative differences (MRDs) and standard deviations in the pixel-difference histograms (σ_RD ) between test and baseline images were calculated. Lateral shift magnitudes were calculated using cross-correlation and edge-detection filtration. To assess patient variations, MRD and σ_RD were calculated from six prostate patients' daily exit images and compared between fractions with and without gas present.

RESULTS

MRDs responded linearly to output and buildup changes with a standard deviation of 0.3%, implying a 1% output change and 0.2 cm changes in buildup could be detected with 2.5σ confidence. Shifting the homogenous phantom laterally resulted in detectable MRD and σ_RD changes, and the cross-correlation function calculated the shift to within 0.5 mm for the heterogeneous phantom. MRD and σ_RD values were significantly associated with the presence of gas for five of the six patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid analyses of automatically acquired Halcyon™ exit images could detect mid-treatment changes with high sensitivity, though appropriate thresholds will need to be set. This study presents the first steps toward developing effortless image evaluation for all aspects of every patient's treatment.

Electronic Portal Imaging Device-Based Three-Dimensional Volumetric Dosimetry for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Pretreatment Quality Assurance

Aim:

This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of treatment planning system (TPS)-based heterogeneity correction for two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based pretreatment dose verification. An experiment was conducted on the EPID back-projection technique and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Materials and Methods:

Treatment plans were delivered in EPID without a patient to obtain the fluence pattern (F_EPID). A heterogeneity correction plane (F_het) for an open beam of 30 cm × 30 cm was extracted from the TPS. The heterogeneity-corrected measured fluence is developed by matrix element multiplication (F_Resultant = F_EPID × F_het). Further planes were summed to develop a 3D dose distribution and exported to the TPS. Dose verifications for 2D and 3D were carried out with the corresponding TPS values using 2D gamma analysis (ɣ) and dose volume histogram (DVH) comparison, respectively. Totally, 33 patients (17 head–neck and 16 thorax cases) were evaluated in this study.

Results:

The head–neck and thorax plans show a 3-mm-distance to agreement (DTA) 3% DD gamma passing of 96.3% ± 2.0% and 95.4% ± 1.8% points, respectively, between F_TPS and F_Resultant. The comparison of the uncorrected measured fluence (F_EPID) with F_TPS reveals a gamma passing of 82.2% ± 7.3% and 80.4% ± 8.6% for head–neck and thorax cases, respectively. A total of 87 out of the 102 head–neck and thorax beams exhibit a planner gamma passing of 97.6% ± 2.1%. In the 3D-DVH comparison of thorax and head–neck cases, D5% for planning target volume were −0.5% ± 2.2% and −2.1% ± 3.5%, respectively; D95% varies as 1.0% ± 2.7% and 1.4% ± 1.1% between TPS calculated and heterogeneity-corrected-EPID-based dose reconstruction.

Conclusion:

The novel TPS-based heterogeneity correction can improve the 2D and 3D EPID-based back projection technique. Structures with large heterogeneities can also be handled using the proposed technique.

First clinical real-time motion-including tumor dose reconstruction during radiotherapy delivery

PURPOSE

To clinically implement and characterize real-time motion-including tumor dose reconstruction during radiotherapy delivery.

METHODS

Seven patients with 2-3 fiducial markers implanted near liver tumors received stereotactic body radiotherapy on a conventional linear accelerator. The 3D marker motion during a setup CBCT scan was determined online from the CBCT projections and used to generate a correlation model between tumor and external marker block motion. During treatment, the correlation model was updated by kV imaging every three seconds and used for real-time tumor localization. Using streamed accelerator parameters and tumor positions, in-house developed software, DoseTracker, calculated the dose to the moving tumor in real-time assuming water density in the patient. Post-treatment, the real-time tumor localization was validated by comparison with independent marker segmentations and 3D motion estimations. Dose reconstruction was validated by comparison with treatment planning system (TPS) calculations that modeled motion as isocenter shifts and used both actual CT densities and water densities.

RESULTS

The real-time estimated tumor position had a mean 3D root-mean-square error of 1.7 mm (range: 0.9-2.6 mm). The motion-induced reduction in the minimum dose to 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV D95) per fraction was up to 12.3%-points. It was estimated in real-time by DoseTracker during patient treatment with a root-mean-square difference relative to the TPS of 1.3%-points (TPS CT) and 1.0%-points (TPS water).

CONCLUSIONS

The world's first clinical real-time motion-including tumor dose reconstruction during radiotherapy was demonstrated. This marks an important milestone for real-time in-treatment quality assurance and paves the way for real-time dose-guided treatment adaptation.

Two-dimensional EPID dosimetry for an MR-linac: Proof of concept

PURPOSE

At our institute, in vivo patient dose distributions are reconstructed for all treatments delivered using conventional linacs from electronic portal imaging device (EPID) transit images acquired during treatment using a simple back-projection model. Currently, the clinical implementation of MRI-guided radiotherapy systems, which aims for online and real-time adaptation of the treatment plan, is progressing. In our department, the MR-linac (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) is now in clinical use. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of two-dimensional (2D) EPID dosimetric verification for the magnetic resonance (MR)-linac by comparing back-projected EPID doses to ionization chamber (IC) array dose distributions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our conventional back-projection algorithm was adapted for the MR-linac. The most important changes involve modeling of the attenuation by and scatter from the cryostat. The commissioning process involved the acquisition of square field EPID measurements using various phantom setups (varying SSD, phantom thickness, and field size). Commissioning models were created for gantry 0°, 90°, and 180° and verified by comparing EPID-reconstructed 2D dose distributions to measurements made with the OCTAVIUS 1500 IC array (PTW, Freiburg, Germany) for two prostate and one rectum IMRT plans (25 beams total). The average of the γ parameters (y-mean and y-pass rate) and the dose difference at a reference point were reported. Due to their construction, the attenuation of couch, bridge, and cryostat shows a much stronger dependence on gantry angle in the MR-linac compared to conventional linacs. We present a method to correct for these effects. This method is validated by dose reconstruction of the 25 intensity-modulated radiation therapy beams recorded at a certain gantry angle using the model of another gantry angle, combined with the correction method.

RESULTS

For dose verification performed at a gantry angle identical to the commissioned model, the average y-mean and y-pass rate values (3% global dose, 2 mm, 10% isodose) were 0.37 ± 0.07 and 98.1, 95% CI [98.1 ± 2.4], respectively. The average dose difference at the reference point was -0.5% ± 1.8%. Verification at gantry angles different from the commissioned model (i.e., using the gantry angle dependent correction) reported 0.39 ± 0.08 and 97.6, 95% CI [96.9, 98.3] average y-mean and y-pass rate values. The average dose difference at the reference point was -0.1% ± 1.8%.

CONCLUSION

The EPID dosimetry back-projection model was successfully adapted for the MR-linac at gantry 0°, 90°, and 180°, accounting for the presence of the MRI housing between phantom (or patient) and the EPID. A method to account for the gantry angle dependence was also tested reporting similar results.

Investigating the effectiveness of monitoring relevant variations during IMRT and VMAT treatments by EPID-based 3D in vivo verification performed using planning CTs

Purpose

The goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of monitoring relevant variations during treatments for electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based 3D in vivo verification performed using planning CTs.

Methods

Experiments on two simple phantoms (uniform and nonuniform phantoms) and a thoracic phantom were analyzed in this study, and six relevant variations including the machine output, planning target volume (PTV) deformation, multileaf collimator (MLC) and Phantom shift (set-up errors), and gantry and couch angle shifts were evaluated. 3D gamma and dose-volume histogram (DVH) methods were used to evaluate the detection sensitivity of the EPID-based 3D in vivo dosimetry and the dose accuracy of the EPID reconstruction, respectively, as affected by the variations, and the results were validated by determining the consistency with TPS simulated results.

Results

The results of the simple phantoms showed that the gamma failure rates and DVH trend of EPID reconstructions were consistent with the results of TPS simulations for machine output and MLC shifts and inconsistent for phantom shift, gantry/couch angle shift and PTV deformation variations. The results of the thoracic phantom showed that CBCT-guided EPID reconstruction sensitively detected 3-mm Phantom shift in thoracic phantom and its gamma failure rates and DVH trend were consistent with the results of TPS simulations.

Conclusion

The variations, such as machine output and MLC shift, that are phantom unrelated and cause changes in the beam of the linear accelerator can be sensitively detected by EPID-based 3D in vivo dosimetry and do not affect the accuracy of the EPID reconstruction dose. Planning CT will limit the detection sensitivity and the accuracy of the reconstruction dose of the EPID-based 3D in vivo dosimetry for phantom-related variations (such as Phantom shift and gantry/couch angle shift). EPID reconstruction combined with IGRT technology is a more effective method to monitor phantom shift variations.

First Report of the Clinical Use of a Commercial Automated System for Daily Patient QA Using EPID Exit Images

Purpose

To characterize the clinical utility of a new commercially available system for daily patient treatment quality assurance using electronic portal imaging detector (EPID) exit dose images.

Methods and Materials

The PerFRACTION automated quality assurance system was used to acquire integrated EPID images for every field every day for 60 treatment courses for 57 patients. Four thousand seventy-nine field values from 855 fractions were analyzed. Gamma passing rates were computed by the system for each field daily. Passing rates and pass-fail status were recorded by treatment modality (intensity modulated radiation therapy or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) and location. When failures occurred, an attempt was made to determine the reason.

Results

Overall, 23% and 8% of fields failed at 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, respectively. Forty-eight percent and 24% of fields failed at least once during the course of therapy for the 2 tolerance settings. Eighteen percent and 8% of all fractions failed and 60% and 28% of courses failed for the 2 tolerance settings, respectively. Eighteen percent of daily field passing rates were below 75% for 3%/3 mm tolerances. Intensity modulated radiation therapy had higher passing rates than 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. For 3%/3 mm tolerances, the fraction fail rate for the brain, extremity, and spine treatment sites failed the least, whereas the abdomen, chest, and head and neck failed more often. The most commonly identified reason for failure was body position change, but the reason for about half the daily field value failures could not be identified.

Conclusions

This is the first report of the clinical utility of a commercial daily patient treatment quality assurance system using EPID exit images. Variations were found in a clinically relevant percentage of images, and these potentially indicate important treatment variations. Reasons for failures are not always discernable. The system was practical to use because of automation and continues to be used for monitoring of nearly every patient in every field every day.

An evaluation of techniques for dose calculation on cone beam computed tomography

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the accuracy and efficiency of four different techniques, thus determining the optimum method for recalculating dose on cone beam CT (CBCT) images acquired during radiotherapy treatments.

METHODS:

Four established techniques were investigated and their accuracy assessed via dose calculations: (1) applying a standard planning CT (pCT) calibration curve, (2) applying a CBCT site-specific calibration curve, (3) performing a density override and (4) using deformable registration. Each technique was applied to 15 patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy to one of three treatment sites, head and neck, lung and prostate. Differences between pCT and CBCT recalculations were determined with dose volume histogram metrics and 2.0%/0.1 mm gamma analysis using the pCT dose distribution as a reference.

RESULTS:

Dose volume histogram analysis indicated that all techniques yielded differences from expected results between 0.0 and 2.3% for both target volumes and organs at risk. With volumetric gamma analysis, the dose recalculation on deformed images yielded the highest pass-rates. The median pass-rate ranges at 50% threshold were 99.6-99.9%, 94.6-96.0%, and 94.8.0-96.0% for prostate, head and neck and lung patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Deformable registration, HU override and site-specific calibration curves were all identified as dosimetrically accurate and efficient methods for dose calculation on CBCT images.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

With the increasing adoption of CBCT, this study provides clinical radiotherapy departments with invaluable information regarding the comparison of dose reconstruction methods, enabling a more accurate representation of a patient's treatment. It can also integrate studies in which CBCT is used in image-guided radiation therapy and for adaptive radiotherapy planning processes.

Epid-based in vivo dose verification for lung stereotactic treatments delivered with multiple breath-hold segmented volumetric modulated arc therapy

We evaluated an EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) method for the dose verification and the treatment reproducibility of lung SBRT-VMAT treatments in clinical routine. Ten patients with lung metastases treated with Elekta VMAT technique were enrolled. All patients were irradiated in five consecutive fractions, with total doses of 50 Gy. Set-up was carried out with the Elekta stereotactic body frame. Eight patients were simulated and treated using the Active Breath Control (ABC) system, a spirometer enabling patients to maintain a breath-hold at a predetermined lung volume. Two patients were simulated and treated in free-breathing using an abdominal compressor. IVD was performed using the SOFTDISO software. IVD tests were evaluated by means of (a) ratio R between daily in-vivo isocenter dose and planned dose and (b) γ-analysis between EPID integral portal images in terms of percentage of points with γ-value smaller than one (γ_% ) and mean γ-values (γ_mean ) using a 3%(global)/3 mm criteria. Alert criteria of ±5% for R ratio, γ_%  < 90%, and γ_mean  > 0.67 were chosen. 50 transit EPID images were acquired. For the patients treated with ABC spirometer, the results reported a high level of accuracy in dose delivery with 100% of tests within ±5%. The γ-analysis showed a mean value of γ_mean equal to 0.21 (range: 0.04-0.56) and a mean γ_% equal to 96.9 (range: 78-100). Relevant discrepancies were observed only for the two patients treated without ABC, mainly due to a blurring dose effect due to residual respiratory motion. Our method provided a fast and accurate procedure in clinical routine for verifying delivered dose as well as for detecting errors.

First online real-time evaluation of motion-induced 4D dose errors during radiotherapy delivery

PURPOSE

In radiotherapy, dose deficits caused by tumor motion often far outweigh the discrepancies typically allowed in plan-specific quality assurance (QA). Yet, tumor motion is not usually included in present QA. We here present a novel method for online treatment verification by real-time motion-including four-dimensional (4D) dose reconstruction and dose evaluation and demonstrate its use during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivery with and without MLC tracking.

METHODS

Five volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were delivered with and without MLC tracking to a motion stage carrying a Delta4 dosimeter. The VMAT plans have previously been used for (nontracking) liver SBRT with intratreatment tumor motion recorded by kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (KIM). The motion stage reproduced the KIM-measured tumor motions in three dimensions (3D) while optical monitoring guided the MLC tracking. Linac parameters and the target position were streamed to an in-house developed software program (DoseTracker) that performed real-time 4D dose reconstructions and 3%/3 mm γ-evaluations of the reconstructed cumulative dose using a concurrently reconstructed planned dose without target motion as reference. Offline, the real-time reconstructed doses and γ-evaluations were validated against 4D dosimeter measurements performed during the experiments.

RESULTS

In total, 181,120 dose reconstructions and 5,237 γ-evaluations were performed online and in real time with median computation times of 30 ms and 1.2 s, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) difference between reconstructed and measured doses was -1.2% (4.9%) for transient doses and -1.5% (3.9%) for cumulative doses. The root-mean-square deviation between reconstructed and measured motion-induced γ-fail rates was 2.0%-point. The mean (standard deviation) sensitivity and specificity of DoseTracker to predict γ-fail rates above a given threshold was 96.8% (3.5%) and 99.2% (0.4%), respectively, for clinically relevant thresholds between 1% and 30% γ-fail rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time delivery-specific QA during radiotherapy of moving targets was demonstrated for the first time. It allows supervision of treatment accuracy and action on treatment discrepancy within 2 s with high sensitivity and specificity.

Comparison of forward- and back-projection in vivo EPID dosimetry for VMAT treatment of the prostate

In the forward-projection method of portal dosimetry for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the integrated signal at the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is predicted at the time of treatment planning, against which the measured integrated image is compared. In the back-projection method, the measured signal at each gantry angle is back-projected through the patient CT scan to give a measure of total dose to the patient. This study aims to investigate the practical agreement between the two types of EPID dosimetry for prostate radiotherapy. The AutoBeam treatment planning system produced VMAT plans together with corresponding predicted portal images, and a total of 46 sets of gantry-resolved portal images were acquired in 13 patients using an iViewGT portal imager. For the forward-projection method, each acquisition of gantry-resolved images was combined into a single integrated image and compared with the predicted image. For the back-projection method, iViewDose was used to calculate the dose distribution in the patient for comparison with the planned dose. A gamma index for 3% and 3 mm was used for both methods. The results were investigated by delivering the same plans to a phantom and repeating some of the deliveries with deliberately introduced errors. The strongest agreement between forward- and back-projection methods is seen in the isocentric intensity/dose difference, with moderate agreement in the mean gamma. The strongest correlation is observed within a given patient, with less correlation between patients, the latter representing the accuracy of prediction of the two methods. The error study shows that each of the two methods has its own distinct sensitivity to errors, but that overall the response is similar. The forward- and back-projection EPID dosimetry methods show moderate agreement in this series of prostate VMAT patients, indicating that both methods can contribute to the verification of dose delivered to the patient.

Characterization of the a-Si EPID in the unity MR-linac for dosimetric applications

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are frequently used in external beam radiation therapy for dose verification purposes. The aim of this study was to investigate the dose-response characteristics of the EPID in the Unity MR-linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) relevant for dosimetric applications under clinical conditions. EPID images and ionization chamber (IC) measurements were used to study the effects of the magnetic field, the scatter generated in the MR housing reaching the EPID, and inhomogeneous attenuation from the MR housing. Dose linearity and dose rate dependencies were also determined. The magnetic field strength at EPID level did not exceed 10 mT, and dose linearity and dose rate dependencies proved to be comparable to that on a conventional linac. Profiles of fields, delivered with and without the magnetic field, were indistinguishable. The EPID center had an offset of 5.6 cm in the longitudinal direction, compared to the beam central axis, meaning that large fields in this direction will partially fall outside the detector area and not be suitable for verification. Beam attenuation by the MRI scanner and the table is gantry angle dependent, presenting a minimum attenuation of 67% relative to the 90° measurement. Repeatability, observed over two months, was within 0.5% (1 SD). In order to use the EPID for dosimetric applications in the MR-linac, challenges related to the EPID position, scatter from the MR housing, and the inhomogeneous, gantry angle-dependent attenuation of the beam will need to be solved.

Novel methodologies for dosimetry audits: Adapting to advanced radiotherapy techniques

With new radiotherapy techniques, treatment delivery is becoming more complex and accordingly, these treatment techniques require dosimetry audits to test advanced aspects of the delivery to ensure best practice and safe patient treatment. This review of novel methodologies for dosimetry audits for advanced radiotherapy techniques includes recent developments and future techniques to be applied in dosimetry audits. Phantom-based methods (i.e. phantom-detector combinations) including independent audit equipment and local measurement equipment as well as phantom-less methods (i.e. portal dosimetry, transmission detectors and log files) are presented and discussed. Methodologies for both conventional linear accelerator (linacs) and new types of delivery units, i.e. Tomotherapy, stereotactic devices and MR-linacs, are reviewed. Novel dosimetry audit techniques such as portal dosimetry or log file evaluation have the potential to allow parallel auditing (i.e. performing an audit at multiple institutions at the same time), automation of data analysis and evaluation of multiple steps of the radiotherapy treatment chain. These methods could also significantly reduce the time needed for audit and increase the information gained. However, to maximise the potential, further development and harmonisation of dosimetry audit techniques are required before these novel methodologies can be applied.

Online dose reconstruction for tracked volumetric arc therapy: Real-time implementation and offline quality assurance for prostate SBRT

PURPOSE

Firstly, this study provides a real-time implementation of online dose reconstruction for tracked volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). Secondly, this study describes a novel offline quality assurance tool, based on commercial dose calculation algorithms.

METHODS

Online dose reconstruction for VMAT is a computationally challenging task in terms of computer memory usage and calculation speed. To potentially reduce the amount of memory used, we analyzed the impact of beam angle sampling for dose calculation on the accuracy of the dose distribution. To establish the performance of the method, we planned two single-arc VMAT prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy cases for delivery with dynamic MLC tracking. For quality assurance of our online dose reconstruction method we have also developed a stand-alone offline dose reconstruction tool, which utilizes the RayStation treatment planning system to calculate dose.

RESULTS

For the online reconstructed dose distributions of the tracked deliveries, we could establish strong resemblance for 72 and 36 beam co-planar equidistant beam samples with less than 1.2% deviation for the assessed dose-volume indicators (clinical target volume D98 and D2, and rectum D2). We could achieve average runtimes of 28-31 ms per reported MLC aperture for both dose computation and accumulation, meeting our real-time requirement. To cross-validate the offline tool, we have compared the planned dose to the offline reconstructed dose for static deliveries and found excellent agreement (3%/3 mm global gamma passing rates of 99.8%-100%).

CONCLUSION

Being able to reconstruct dose during delivery enables online quality assurance and online replanning strategies for VMAT. The offline quality assurance tool provides the means to validate novel online dose reconstruction applications using a commercial dose calculation engine.

Technical Note: A simple algorithm to convert EPID gray values into absorbed dose to water without prior knowledge

PURPOSE

Full integration of EPID-based dosimetry in a global quality control workflow is still complicated. All the actual solutions are based on a relation between image gray-level signal and total linac-delivered dose. In this study, we propose a simple algorithm relying pixel gray-level of EPID image with average linac delivered dose per acquisition frame.

METHODS

Calibration models are constructed for Varian and Elekta linacs including scattering conditions and EPID-arm backscatter-specific corrections. Only simple homogeneous fields are required to establish the EPID dose conversion model for each x-ray beam. Then, the model was evaluated by comparing calculated and converted dose distributions for homogeneous and modulated beams using gamma maps.

RESULTS

To fit average dose per frame (Df_norm ) vs pixel gray value (Ng_norm ) of each EPID image, a logarithmic curve Dfnorm=A+B∗lnNgnorm-C, has been chosen where A, B and C are constants depending on beam energy. Gamma comparison (2%, 2 mm, threshold 15%) between converted images and calculated dose distributions for linac control and pretreatment patient fields led to a gamma pass rate higher than 97% for all the analyzed fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Without a prior irradiation settings knowledge except the incident energy beam, we use EPID as a reliable dose to water detector for both homogeneous and modulated beams.

Online Combination of EPID & Cherenkov Imaging for 3-D Dosimetry in a Liquid Phantom

Online acquisition of Cherenkov and portal imaging data was combined with a reconstruction scheme called EC3-D, providing a full 3-D dosimetry of megavoltage X-ray beams in a water tank. The methodology was demonstrated and quantified in a single static beam. Furthermore, the dynamics and visualization of the 3-D dose reconstruction were demonstrated with a volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for TG-119 C-Shape geometry. The developed algorithm combines depth dose information, provided by Cherenkov images, with the lateral dose distribution, provided by the electronic portal imaging device. The strength of our approach lies in the acquisition of both imaging data streams with sub-millimeter theoretical resolution at 5-Hz frame-rate, which can be concurrently processed by the fast Fourier transform-based analysis, thus providing means for an efficient real-time 3-D dosimetry.

Detection of anatomical changes in lung cancer patients with 2D time-integrated, 2D time-resolved and 3D time-integrated portal dosimetry: a simulation study

The aim of this work is to assess the performance of 2D time-integrated (2D-TI), 2D time-resolved (2D-TR) and 3D time-integrated (3D-TI) portal dosimetry in detecting dose discrepancies between the planned and (simulated) delivered dose caused by simulated changes in the anatomy of lung cancer patients. For six lung cancer patients, tumor shift, tumor regression and pleural effusion are simulated by modifying their CT images. Based on the modified CT images, time-integrated (TI) and time-resolved (TR) portal dose images (PDIs) are simulated and 3D-TI doses are calculated. The modified and original PDIs and 3D doses are compared by a gamma analysis with various gamma criteria. Furthermore, the difference in the D _95% (ΔD _95%) of the GTV is calculated and used as a gold standard. The correlation between the gamma fail rate and the ΔD _95% is investigated, as well the sensitivity and specificity of all combinations of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate threshold. On the individual patient level, there is a correlation between the gamma fail rate and the ΔD _95%, which cannot be found at the group level. The sensitivity and specificity analysis showed that there is not one combination of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate threshold that can detect all simulated anatomical changes. This work shows that it will be more beneficial to relate portal dosimetry and DVH analysis on the patient level, rather than trying to quantify a relationship for a group of patients. With regards to optimizing sensitivity and specificity, different combinations of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate should be used to optimally detect certain types of anatomical changes.

A Swiss cheese error detection method for real-time EPID-based quality assurance and error prevention

PURPOSE

To develop a robust and efficient process that detects relevant dose errors (dose errors of ≥5%) in external beam radiation therapy and directly indicates the origin of the error. The process is illustrated in the context of electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based angle-resolved volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance (QA), particularly as would be implemented in a real-time monitoring program.

METHODS

A Swiss cheese error detection (SCED) method was created as a paradigm for a cine EPID-based during-treatment QA. For VMAT, the method compares a treatment plan-based reference set of EPID images with images acquired over each 2° gantry angle interval. The process utilizes a sequence of independent consecutively executed error detection tests: an aperture check that verifies in-field radiation delivery and ensures no out-of-field radiation; output normalization checks at two different stages; global image alignment check to examine if rotation, scaling, and translation are within tolerances; pixel intensity check containing the standard gamma evaluation (3%, 3 mm) and pixel intensity deviation checks including and excluding high dose gradient regions. Tolerances for each check were determined. To test the SCED method, 12 different types of errors were selected to modify the original plan. A series of angle-resolved predicted EPID images were artificially generated for each test case, resulting in a sequence of precalculated frames for each modified treatment plan. The SCED method was applied multiple times for each test case to assess the ability to detect introduced plan variations. To compare the performance of the SCED process with that of a standard gamma analysis, both error detection methods were applied to the generated test cases with realistic noise variations.

RESULTS

Averaged over ten test runs, 95.1% of all plan variations that resulted in relevant patient dose errors were detected within 2° and 100% within 14° (<4% of patient dose delivery). Including cases that led to slightly modified but clinically equivalent plans, 89.1% were detected by the SCED method within 2°. Based on the type of check that detected the error, determination of error sources was achieved. With noise ranging from no random noise to four times the established noise value, the averaged relevant dose error detection rate of the SCED method was between 94.0% and 95.8% and that of gamma between 82.8% and 89.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

An EPID-frame-based error detection process for VMAT deliveries was successfully designed and tested via simulations. The SCED method was inspected for robustness with realistic noise variations, demonstrating that it has the potential to detect a large majority of relevant dose errors. Compared to a typical (3%, 3 mm) gamma analysis, the SCED method produced a higher detection rate for all introduced dose errors, identified errors in an earlier stage, displayed a higher robustness to noise variations, and indicated the error source.