Evaluation of DIR schemes on tumor/organ with progressive shrinkage: accuracy of tumor/organ internal tissue tracking during the radiation treatment

PURPOSE

Accuracy of intratumoral treatment dose accumulation and response assessment highly depends on the accuracy of a DIR method. However, achievable accuracy of the existing DIR methods for tumor/organ with large and progressive shrinkage during the radiotherapy course have not been explored. This study aimed to use a bio-tissue phantom to quantify the achievable accuracy of different DIR schemes.

MATERIALS /METHODS

A fresh porcine liver was used for phantom material. Sixty gold markers were implanted on the surface and inside of the liver. To simulate the progressive radiation-induced tumor/organ shrinkage, the phantom was heated using a microwave oven incrementally from 30s to 200s in 8 phases. For each phase, the phantom was scanned by CT. Two extra image sets were generated from the original images: 1) the image set with overriding the high-density gold markers (feature image); 2) the image set with overriding the entire phantom to the mean soft tissue intensity (featureless image). Ten DIR schemes were evaluated to mimic clinical treatment situations of tumor/critical organ with respect to their surface and internal condition of image features, availability of intermediate feedback images and DIR methods. The internal marker's positions were utilized to evaluate DIR accuracy quantified by target registration error (TRE).

RESULTS

Volume reduction was about 20% ∼ 40% of the initial volume after 90s ∼ 200s of the heating. Without image features on the surface and inside of the phantom, the hybrid-DIR (image-based DIR followed by biomechanical model-based refinement) with the surface constraint achieved the registration TRE from 2.6 ± 1.2mm to 5.3 ± 2.6mm proportional to the %volume shrinkage. Meanwhile, the hybrid-DIR with the surface-marker constraint achieved the TRE from 2.4 ± 1.2mm to 2.6 ± 1.0mm. If both the surface and internal image features would be viable on the feedback images, the achievable accuracy could be minimal with the TRE from 1.6±0.9mm to 1.9 ± 1.2mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard DIR methods cannot guarantee intratumoral tissue registration accuracy for tumor/organ with large progressive shrinkage. Achievable accuracy with using the hybrid DIR method is highly dependent on the surface registration accuracy. If the surface registration mean TRE can be controlled within 2mm, the mean TRE of internal tissue can be controlled within 3mm.

Rigid and Deformable Image Registration for Radiation Therapy: A Self-Study Evaluation Guide for NRG Oncology Clinical Trial Participation

PURPOSE

The registration of multiple imaging studies to radiation therapy computed tomography simulation, including magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, etc. is a widely used strategy in radiation oncology treatment planning, and these registrations have valuable roles in image guidance, dose composition/accumulation, and treatment delivery adaptation. The NRG Oncology Medical Physics subcommittee formed a working group to investigate feasible workflows for a self-study credentialing process of image registration commissioning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 132 (TG132) report on the use of image registration and fusion algorithms in radiation therapy provides basic guidelines for quality assurance and quality control of the image registration algorithms and the overall clinical process. The report recommends a series of tests and the corresponding metrics that should be evaluated and reported during commissioning and routine quality assurance, as well as a set of recommendations for vendors. The NRG Oncology medical physics subcommittee working group found incompatibility of some digital phantoms with commercial systems. Thus, there is still a need to provide further recommendations in terms of compatible digital phantoms, clinical feasible workflow, and achievable thresholds, especially for future clinical trials involving deformable image registration algorithms. Nine institutions participated and evaluated 4 commonly used commercial imaging registration software and various versions in the field of radiation oncology.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The NRG Oncology Working Group on image registration commissioning herein provides recommendations on the use of digital phantom/data sets and analytical software access for institutions and clinics to perform their own self-study evaluation of commercial imaging systems that might be employed for coregistration in radiation therapy treatment planning and image guidance procedures. Evaluation metrics and their corresponding values were given as guidelines to establish practical tolerances. Vendor compliance for image registration commissioning was evaluated, and recommendations were given for future development.

The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation

BACKGROUND

Advanced clinical applications, such as dose accumulation and adaptive radiation therapy, require deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms capable of voxel-wise accurate mapping of treatment dose or functional imaging. By utilizing a multistage deformable phantom, the authors investigated scenarios where biomechanical refinement method (BM-DIR) may be better than the pure image intensity based deformable registration (IM-DIR).

METHODS

The authors developed a biomechanical-model based DIR refinement method (BM-DIR) to refine the deformable vector field (DVF) from any initial intensity-based DIR (IM-DIR). The BM-DIR method was quantitatively evaluated on a novel phantom capable of ten reproducible gradually-increasing deformation stages using the urethra tube as a surrogate. The internal DIR accuracy was inspected in term of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff and mean surface distance as defined in of the urethra structure inside the phantom and compared with that of the initial IM-DIR under various stages of deformation. Voxel-wise deformation vector discrepancy and Jacobian regularity were also inspected to evaluate the output DVFs. In addition to phantom, two pairs of Head&Neck patient MR images with expert-defined landmarks inside parotids were utilized to evaluate the BM-DIR accuracy with target registration error (TRE).

RESULTS

The DSC and surface distance measures of the inner urethra tube indicated the BM-DIR method can improve the internal DVF accuracy on masked MR images for the phases of a large degree of deformation. The smoother Jacobian distribution from the BM-DIR suggests more physically-plausible internal deformation. For H&N cancer patients, the BM-DIR improved the TRE from 0.339 cm to 0.210 cm for the landmarks inside parotid on the masked MR images.

CONCLUSIONS

We have quantitatively demonstrated on a multi-stage physical phantom and limited patient data that the proposed BM-DIR can improve the accuracy inside solid organs with large deformation where distinctive image features are absent.

Technical Note: The impact of deformable image registration methods on dose warping

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical-relevant discrepancy between doses warped by pure image based deformable image registration (IM-DIR) and by biomechanical model based DIR (BM-DIR) on intensity-homogeneous organs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients (5Head&Neck, 5Prostate) were included. A research DIR tool (ADMRIE_v1.12) was utilized for IM-DIR. After IM-DIR, BM-DIR was carried out for organs (parotids, bladder, and rectum) which often encompass sharp dose gradient. Briefly, high-quality tetrahedron meshes were generated and deformable vector fields (DVF) from IM-DIR were interpolated to the surface nodes of the volume meshes as boundary condition. Then, a FEM solver (ABAQUS_v6.14) was used to simulate the displacement of internal nodes, which were then interpolated to image-voxel grids to get the more physically plausible DVF. Both geometrical and subsequent dose warping discrepancies were quantified between the two DIR methods. Target registration discrepancy(TRD) was evaluated to show the geometry difference. The re-calculated doses on second CT were warped to the pre-treatment CT via two DIR. Clinical-relevant dose parameters and γ passing rate were compared between two types of warped dose. The correlation was evaluated between parotid shrinkage and TRD/dose discrepancy.

RESULT

The parotid shrunk to 75.7% ± 9% of its pre-treatment volume and the percentage of volume with TRD>1.5 mm) was 6.5% ± 4.7%. The normalized mean-dose difference (NMDD) of IM-DIR and BM-DIR was -0.8% ± 1.5%, with range (-4.7% to 1.5%). 2 mm/2% passing rate was 99.0% ± 1.4%. A moderate correlation was found between parotid shrinkage and TRD and NMDD. The bladder had a NMDD of -9.9% ± 9.7%, with BM-DIR warped dose systematically higher. Only minor deviation was observed for rectum NMDD (0.5% ± 1.1%).

CONCLUSION

Impact of DIR method on treatment dose warping is patient and organ-specific. Generally, intensity-homogeneous organs, which undergo larger deformation/shrinkage during treatment and encompass sharp dose gradient, will have greater dose warping uncertainty. For these organs, BM-DIR could be beneficial to the evaluation of DIR/dose-warping uncertainty.