Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing

Hybrid Cochlear Implant Outcomes and Improving Outcomes With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation

INTRODUCTION

Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) provides cochlear implant (CI) recipients with preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing in the implanted ear affording auditory cues not reliably transmitted by the CI including fundamental frequency, temporal fine structure, and interaural time differences (ITDs). A prospective US multicenter clinical trial was conducted examining the safety and effectiveness of a hybrid CI for delivering EAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two adults (mean age 59.9 yr) were enrolled in the study and followed up to 5 years postactivation. Testing included unaided and aided audiometric thresholds, speech perception (Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant [CNC] words in quiet and AzBio sentences +5 dB SNR), and patient-reported outcomes (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale).

RESULTS

Functionally aidable hearing, defined as low-frequency pure-tone average (125-500 Hz) <80 dB HL, was maintained for 77% of patients through 1 year, with 66.7% maintaining through 5 years. Speech perception was significantly improved at all postoperative timepoints compared with preoperative performance with hearing aid(s), and patient-reported outcomes indicated significantly improved subjective speech understanding, spatial hearing, and sound quality. Participants with preserved acoustic hearing using EAS reported significantly higher subjective spatial hearing and sound quality than participants with electric-only hearing in the implanted ear.

DISCUSSION

Patients with high-frequency hearing loss demonstrate significant long-term benefit with a hybrid CI including high rates of functional hearing preservation, significantly improved speech perception, and subjective patient-reported outcomes. EAS with binaural acoustic hearing affords benefit for subjective spatial hearing and sound quality beyond CI listening configurations using monaural acoustic hearing.

Improved Cochlear Implant Performance Estimation Using Tonotopic-Based Electrocochleography

Importance

Cochlear implantation produces remarkable results in postlingual deafness, although auditory outcomes vary. Electrocochleography (ECochG) has emerged as a valuable tool for assessing the cochlear-neural substrate and evaluating patient prognosis.

Objective

To assess whether ECochG-total response (ECochG-TR) recorded at the best-frequency electrode (BF-ECochG-TR) correlates more strongly with speech perception performance than ECochG-TR measured at the round window (RW-ECochG-TR).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center cross-sectional study recruited 142 patients from July 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022, with 1-year follow-up. Exclusions included perilymph suctioning, crimped sound delivery tubes, non-native English speakers, inner ear malformations, nonpatent external auditory canals, or cochlear implantation revision surgery.

Exposures

Cochlear implantation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Speech perception testing, including the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words test, AzBio sentences in quiet, and AzBio sentences in noise plus 10-dB signal to noise ratio (with low scores indicating poor performance and high scores indicating excellent performance on all tests), at 6 months postoperatively; and RW-ECochG-TR and BF-ECochG-TR (measured for 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz).

Results

A total of 109 of the 142 eligible postlingual adults (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [15.8] years; 67 [61.5%] male) were included in the study. Both BF-ECochG-TR and RW-ECochG-TR were correlated with 6-month CNC scores (BF-ECochG-TR: r = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.82; RW-ECochG-TR: r = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76). A multivariate model incorporating age, duration of hearing loss, and angular insertion depth did not outperform BF-ECochG-TR or RW-ECochG-TR alone. The BF-ECochG-TR correlation with CNC scores was significantly stronger than the RW-ECochG-TR correlation (r difference = -0.18; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.01; z = -2.02). More moderate correlations existed between 6-month AzBio scores in noise, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (r = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.60), and BF-ECochG-TR (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.58). MoCA and the interaction between BF-ECochG-TR and MoCA accounted for a substantial proportion of variability in AzBio scores in noise at 6 months (R2 = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.61).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series, BF-ECochG-TR was identified as having a stronger correlation with cochlear implantation performance than RW-ECochG-TR, although both measures highlight the critical role of the cochlear-neural substrate on outcomes. Demographic, audiologic, and surgical factors demonstrated weak correlations with cochlear implantation performance, and performance in noise was found to require a robust cochlear-neural substrate (BF-ECochG-TR) as well as sufficient cognitive capacity (MoCA). Future cochlear implantation studies should consider these variables when assessing performance and related interventions.

Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients

OBJECTIVE

Minimally traumatic surgical techniques and advances in cochlear implant (CI) electrode array designs have allowed acoustic hearing present in a CI candidate prior to surgery to be preserved postoperatively. As a result, these patients benefit from combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) postoperatively. However, 30% to 40% of EAS CI users experience a partial loss of hearing up to 30 dB after surgery. This additional hearing loss is generally not severe enough to preclude use of acoustic amplification; however, it can still impact EAS benefits. The use of electrocochleography (ECoG) measures of peripheral hair cell and neural auditory function have shed insight into the pathophysiology of postimplant loss of residual acoustic hearing. The present study aims to assess the long-term stability of ECoG measures and to establish ECoG as an objective method of monitoring residual hearing over the course of EAS CI use. We hypothesize that repeated measures of ECoG should remain stable over time for EAS CI users with stable postoperative hearing preservation. We also hypothesize that changes in behavioral audiometry for EAS CI users with loss of residual hearing should also be reflected in changes in ECoG measures.

DESIGN

A pool of 40 subjects implanted under hearing preservation protocol was included in the study. Subjects were seen at postoperative visits for behavioral audiometry and ECoG recordings. Test sessions occurred 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12 months, and annually after 12 months postoperatively. Changes in pure-tone behavioral audiometric thresholds relative to baseline were used to classify subjects into two groups: one group with stable acoustic hearing and another group with loss of acoustic hearing. At each test session, ECoG amplitude growth functions for several low-frequency stimuli were obtained. The threshold, slope, and suprathreshold amplitude at a fixed stimulation level was obtained from each growth function at each time point. Longitudinal linear mixed effects models were used to study trends in ECoG thresholds, slopes, and amplitudes for subjects with stable hearing and subjects with hearing loss.

RESULTS

Preoperative, behavioral audiometry indicated that subjects had an average low-frequency pure-tone average (125 to 500 Hz) of 40.88 ± 13.12 dB HL. Postoperatively, results showed that ECoG thresholds and amplitudes were stable in EAS CI users with preserved residual hearing. ECoG thresholds increased (worsened) while ECoG amplitudes decreased (worsened) for those with delayed hearing loss. The slope did not distinguish between EAS CI users with stable hearing and subjects with delayed loss of hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a new application of postoperative ECoG as an objective tool to monitor residual hearing and understand the pathophysiology of delayed hearing loss. While our measures were conducted with custom-designed in-house equipment, CI companies are also designing and implementing hardware and software adaptations to conduct ECoG recordings. Thus, postoperative ECoG recordings can potentially be integrated into clinical practice.

Intracochlear electrocochleography findings in cochlear implant recipients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) findings in a group of cochlear implant (CI) recipients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) with a group of CI recipients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Auditory outcome and spectral resolution findings were also compared among CI recipients with and without cochlear microphonic (CM) responses.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective cohort study was undertaken at a tertiary referral center. CM responses by the intracochlear ECochG test were recorded in CI recipients at 0.25-2 kHz. Speech, spatial, and hearing quality (SSQ) outcomes and spectral resolution measured with the spectral-temporally modulated ripple test were obtained for each recipient. The study included 62 implanted ears in 46 recipients, of which 59% (n = 27) were male and 41% (n = 19) were female. Twenty-nine ears with ANSD and 33 ears with SNHL were included. The mean age of the participants was 11 years. The results compared the intracochlear ECochG findings of the ANSD group with those of the SNHL group.

RESULTS

Participants were divided into two groups with and without obtainable CM responses. CM responses were obtained in 13 of 29 ears in the ANSD group and 14 of 33 ears in the SNHL group. CM thresholds obtained were better according to behavioral audiometric responses in some frequencies in the ANSD group. No significant difference was found in the auditory outcome and spectral resolution among CI recipients with and without CM responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracochlear ECochG has a limited potential clinical value for monitoring ANSD. CM thresholds obtained using ECochG may not reflect behavioral hearing thresholds.

Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function

The cochlear implant (CI) is widely considered to be one of the most innovative and successful neuroprosthetic treatments developed to date. Although outcomes vary, CIs are able to effectively improve hearing in nearly all recipients and can substantially improve speech understanding and quality of life for patients with significant hearing loss. A wealth of research has focused on underlying factors that contribute to success with a CI, and recent evidence suggests that the overall health of the cochlea could potentially play a larger role than previously recognized. This article defines and reviews attributes of cochlear health and describes procedures to evaluate cochlear health in humans and animal models in order to examine the effects of cochlear health on performance with a CI. Lastly, we describe how future biologic approaches can be used to preserve and/or enhance cochlear health in order to maximize performance for individual CI recipients.

Pitch perception with the temporal limits encoder for cochlear implants

The temporal-limits-encoder (TLE) strategy has been proposed to enhance the representation of temporal fine structure (TFS) in cochlear implants (CIs), which is vital for many aspects of sound perception but is typically discarded by most modern CI strategies. TLE works by computing an envelope modulator that is within the temporal pitch limits of CI electric hearing. This paper examines the TFS information encoded by TLE and evaluates the salience and usefulness of this information in CI users. Two experiments were conducted to compare pitch perception performance of TLE versus the widely-used Advanced Combinational Encoder (ACE) strategy. Experiment 1 investigated whether TLE processing improved pitch discrimination compared to ACE. Experiment 2 parametrically examined the effect of changing the lower frequency limit of the TLE modulator on pitch ranking. In both experiments, F0 difference limens were measured with synthetic harmonic complex tones using an adaptive procedure. Signal analysis of the outputs of TLE and ACE strategies showed that TLE introduces important temporal pitch cues that are not available with ACE. Results showed an improvement in pitch discrimination with TLE when the acoustic input had a lower F0 frequency. No significant effect of lower frequency limit was observed for pitch ranking, though a lower limit did tend to provide better outcomes. These results suggest that the envelope modulation introduced by TLE can improve pitch perception for CI listeners.

Electrocochleography and cognition are important predictors of speech perception outcomes in noise for cochlear implant recipients

Although significant progress has been made in understanding outcomes following cochlear implantation, predicting performance remains a challenge. Duration of hearing loss, age at implantation, and electrode positioning within the cochlea together explain ~ 25% of the variability in speech-perception scores in quiet using the cochlear implant (CI). Electrocochleography (ECochG) responses, prior to implantation, account for 47% of the variance in the same speech-perception measures. No study to date has explored CI performance in noise, a more realistic measure of natural listening. This study aimed to (1) validate ECochG total response (ECochG-TR) as a predictor of performance in quiet and (2) evaluate whether ECochG-TR explained variability in noise performance. Thirty-five adult CI recipients were enrolled with outcomes assessed at 3-months post-implantation. The results confirm previous studies showing a strong correlation of ECochG-TR with speech-perception in quiet (r = 0.77). ECochG-TR independently explained 34% of the variability in noise performance. Multivariate modeling using ECochG-TR and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores explained 60% of the variability in speech-perception in noise. Thus, ECochG-TR, a measure of the cochlear substrate prior to implantation, is necessary but not sufficient for explaining performance in noise. Rather, a cognitive measure is also needed to improve prediction of noise performance.

Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing

Acoustic hearing can be preserved after cochlear implant (CI) surgery, allowing for combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) and superior speech understanding compared to electric-only hearing. Among patients who initially retain useful acoustic hearing, 30-40 % experience a delayed hearing loss that occurs 3 or more months after CI activation. Increases in electrode impedances have been associated with delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing, suggesting a possible role of intracochlear inflammation/fibrosis as reported by Scheperle et al. (Hear Res 350:45-57, 2017) and Shaul et al. (Otol Neurotol 40(5):e518-e526, 2019). These studies measured only total impedance. Total impedance consists of a composite of access resistance, which reflects resistance of the intracochlear environment, and polarization impedance, which reflects resistive and capacitive properties of the electrode-electrolyte interface as described by Dymond (IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 23(4):274-280, 1976) and Tykocinski et al. (Otol Neurotol 26(5):948-956, 2005). To explore the role of access and polarization impedance components in loss of residual acoustic hearing, these measures were collected from Nucleus EAS CI users with stable acoustic hearing and subsequent precipitous loss of hearing. For the hearing loss group, total impedance and access resistance increased over time while polarization impedance remained stable. For the stable hearing group, total impedance and access resistance were stable while polarization impedance declined. Increased access resistance rather than polarization impedance appears to drive the increase in total impedances seen with loss of hearing. Moreover, access resistance has been correlated with intracochlear fibrosis/inflammation in animal studies as observed by Xu et al. (Hear Res 105(1-2):1-29, 1997) and Tykocinski et al. (Hear Res 159(1-2):53-68, 2001). These findings thus support intracochlear inflammation as one contributor to loss of acoustic hearing in our EAS CI population.

Is Characteristic Frequency Limiting Real-Time Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation?

Objectives

Electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings during cochlear implantation have shown promise in estimating the impact on residual hearing. The purpose of the study was (1) to determine whether a 250-Hz stimulus is superior to 500-Hz in detecting residual hearing decrement and if so; (2) to evaluate whether crossing the 500-Hz tonotopic, characteristic frequency (CF) place partly explains the problems experienced using 500-Hz.

Design

Multifrequency ECochG comprising an alternating, interleaved acoustic complex of 250- and 500-Hz stimuli was used to elicit cochlear microphonics (CMs) during insertion. The largest ECochG drops (≥30% reduction in CM) were identified. After insertion, ECochG responses were measured using the individual electrodes along the array for both 250- and 500-Hz stimuli. Univariate regression was used to predict whether 250- or 500-Hz CM drops explained low-frequency pure tone average (LFPTA; 125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) shift at 1-month post-activation. Postoperative CT scans were performed to evaluate cochlear size and angular insertion depth.

Results

For perimodiolar insertions (N = 34), there was a stronger linear correlation between the largest ECochG drop using 250-Hz stimulus and LFPTA shift (r = 0.58), compared to 500-Hz (r = 0.31). The 250- and 500-Hz CM insertion tracings showed an amplitude peak at two different locations, with the 500-Hz peak occurring earlier in most cases than the 250-Hz peak, consistent with tonotopicity. When using the entire array for recordings after insertion, a maximum 500-Hz response was observed 2-6 electrodes basal to the most-apical electrode in 20 cases (58.9%). For insertions where the apical insertion angle is >350 degrees and the cochlear diameter is <9.5 mm, the maximum 500-Hz ECochG response may occur at the non-apical most electrode. For lateral wall insertions (N = 14), the maximum 250- and 500-Hz CM response occurred at the most-apical electrode in all but one case.

Conclusion

Using 250-Hz stimulus for ECochG feedback during implantation is more predictive of hearing preservation than 500-Hz. This is due to the electrode passing the 500-Hz CF during insertion which may be misidentified as intracochlear trauma; this is particularly important in subjects with smaller cochlear diameters and deeper insertions. Multifrequency ECochG can be used to differentiate between trauma and advancement of the apical electrode beyond the CF.

Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation

OBJECTIVES

To compare intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) with hearing preservation outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) subjects.

DESIGN

Intraoperative electrocochleography was performed in adult CI subjects who were recipients of Advanced Bionics' Bionics LLC precurved HiFocus MidScala or straight HiFocus SlimJ electrode arrays. ECochG responses were recorded from the most apical electrode contact during insertion. No changes to the insertions were made due to ECochG monitoring. No information about insertion resistance was collected. ECochG drops were estimated as the change in amplitude from peak (defined as maximum amplitude response) to drop (largest drop) point after the peak during insertion was measured following the peak response. Audiometric thresholds from each subject were obtained before and approximately 1 month after CI surgery. The change in pure tone average for frequencies between 125 Hz and 500 Hz was measured after surgery. No postoperative CT scans were collected as part of this study.

RESULTS

A total of 68 subjects from five surgical centers participated in the study. The study sample included 30 MidScala and 38 SlimJ electrodes implanted by approximately 20 surgeons who contributed to the study. Although a wide range of results were observed, there was a moderate positive correlation (Pearson Correlation coefficient, r = 0.56, p < 0.01) between the size of the ECochG drop and the magnitude of pure tone average change. This trend was present for both the MidScala and SlimJ arrays. The SlimJ and MidScala arrays produced significantly different hearing loss after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Large ECochG amplitude drops observed during electrode insertion indicated poorer hearing preservation. Although the outcomes were variable, this information may be helpful to guide surgical decision-making when contemplating full electrode insertion and the likelihood of hearing preservation.

Mythbusters! The Truth about Common Misconceptions in Cochlear Implantation

Cochlear implantation (CI) is the preferred method of hearing rehabilitation when patients cannot perform well with traditional amplification. Unfortunately, there are still significant misconceptions around this life-changing intervention. The goal of this article is to address some of the most common myths around CI surgery. After reading this article, the learner will be able to explain the utility of CI in patients with residual hearing and recognize that insurance coverage is widespread. The reader will be able to list common risks associated with this well-tolerated procedure including anesthetic risk and the risk of vestibular dysfunction. Additionally, the reader will be able to identify the significant positive impact of CI on patients' quality of life. Finally, the reader will identify that many patients can safely have an MRI scan after implantation, including nearly all contemporary recipients.