Cell Type-Specific Roles of CD38 in the Interactions of Isoniazid with NAD+ in the Liver

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Daratumumab

Daratumumab is a fully human, monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 and a first-in-class CD38-targeting drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma or newly diagnosed light-chain amyloidosis. CD38 is heavily expressed on malignant myeloma cells, and daratumumab exerts anti-myeloma activity via immune-mediated mechanisms, direct induction of apoptosis, and immunomodulation. Daratumumab is used as monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care myeloma therapies, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, DNA-alkylating agents, and corticosteroids. Following an intravenous infusion, daratumumab exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK), as clearance decreases with higher doses and over time because of target-mediated effects. Dosing schedules vary depending on indications and co-administered drugs, but generally daratumumab is administered weekly for 6-9 weeks followed by a less frequent dosing regimen, once every 2-4 weeks. Daratumumab exposure is strongly correlated with efficacy, and the exposure-efficacy relationship follows a maximal effect model, whereas exposure is not correlated with safety endpoints. The approved dose of 16 mg/kg of daratumumab results in the saturation of 99% of the target at the end of weekly dosing in most patients, and high target saturation is maintained over time during the less frequent dosing schedule. Infusion-related reactions are frequently observed in patients given daratumumab, particularly with the first infusion, thus prompting long durations of infusion (~ 7 h) and splitting of the first dose across 2 days. This led to the development of a subcutaneous delivery formulation for daratumumab (Dara-SC). Dara-SC provides a similar efficacy and safety profile to intravenous daratumumab (Dara-IV) but has a much lower rate of infusion-related reactions and a shorter infusion time. Exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety endpoints were similar between Dara-SC and Dara-IV, and co-administered drugs with either Dara-IV or Dara-SC do not significantly affect daratumumab PK. Except for baseline myeloma type and albumin level, none of the other investigated disease and patient characteristics (renal/hepatic function, age, sex, race, weight, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) was identified to have clinically relevant effects on exposure to daratumumab monotherapy or combination therapy regimens. Dara-IV exposure was significantly lower in patients with immunoglobulin G myeloma compared with patients with non-immunoglobulin G myeloma (p < 0.0001) and in patients with a lower albumin level, whereas the overall response rate was similar regardless of the myeloma type and albumin level. Daratumumab dose adjustment is not currently recommended based on disease and patient characteristics.

Mechanisms of isoniazid and rifampicin-induced liver injury and the effects of natural medicinal ingredients: A review

Isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RFP) are the first-line medications for tuberculosis treatment, and liver injury is the major adverse effect. Natural medicinal ingredients provide distinct benefits in alleviating patients’ symptoms, lowering the liver injury risk, delaying disease progression, and strengthening the body’s ability to heal. This paper summarises the recent research on the mechanisms of INH and RFP-induced liver injury and the effects of natural medicinal ingredients. It is believed that INH-induced liver injury may be attributed to oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, drug metabolic enzymes, protoporphyrin IX accumulation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, bile transport imbalance, and immune response. RFP-induced liver injury is mainly related to cholestasis, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and liver lipid accumulation. However, the combined effect of INH and RFP on liver injury risk is still uncertain. RFP can increase INH-induced hepatotoxicity by regulating the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In contrast, INH can antagonize RFP-induced liver injury by reducing the total bilirubin level in the blood. Sagittaria sagittifolia polysaccharide, quercetin, gallic acid, and other natural medicinal ingredients play protective roles on INH and RFP-induced liver injury by enhancing the body’s antioxidant capacity, regulating metabolism, inhibiting cell apoptosis, and reducing the inflammatory response. There are still many gaps in the literature on INH and RFP-induced liver injury mechanisms and the effects of natural medicinal ingredients. Thus, further research should be carried out from the perspectives of liver injury phenotype, injury markers, in vitro and in vivo liver injury model construction, and liver-gut axis. This paper comprehensively reviewed the literature on mechanisms involved in INH and RFP-induced liver injury and the status of developing new drugs against INH and RFP-induced liver injury. In addition, this review also highlighted the uses and advantages of natural medicinal ingredients in treating drug-induced liver injury.