Potassium-competitive acid blockers and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the most commonly used antisecretory medi-cations in the management of reflux illness, virtually eliminate elective surgery for ulcer disease, and relegate anti-reflux surgery to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are inadequately managed by medical therapy. However, PPI medications still leave some therapeutic demands of GERD unmet. Furthermore, up to 40%-55% of daily PPI users have chronic symptoms, due to PPI refractoriness. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) transcend many of the problems and limits of PPIs, delivering quick, powerful, and extended acid suppression and allowing for treatment of numerous unmet needs. Recently, it has become clear that compromised mucosal integrity plays a role in the etiology of GERD. As a result, esophageal mucosal protection has emerged as a novel and potential treatment approach. An increasing body of research demonstrates that when P-CABs are used as primary drugs or add-on drugs (to regular treatment), they provide a considerable extra benefit, particularly in alleviating symptoms that do not respond to PPI therapy.

New pharmacologic approaches in gastroesophageal reflux disease

This article highlights current and emerging pharmacological treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), opportunities for improving medical treatment, the extent to which improvements may be achieved with current therapy, and where new therapies may be required. These issues are discussed in the context of current thinking on the pathogenesis of GERD and its various manifestations and on the pharmacologic basis of current treatments.

New pharmacologic approaches in gastroesophageal reflux disease

This article highlights current and emerging pharmacological treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), opportunities for improving medical treatment, the extent to which improvements may be achieved with current therapy, and where new therapies may be required. These issues are discussed in the context of current thinking on the pathogenesis of GERD and its various manifestations and on the pharmacologic basis of current treatments.

A matched case-control study of a novel Acid-pump antagonist and proton-pump inhibitor for the treatment of iatrogenic ulcers caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Revaprazan, a novel acid-pump antagonist, and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have pH-independent effects on ulcer healing. The addition of a PPI promotes the cell restitution rate as well as vessel regeneration and maturation for ulcer repair. Revaprazan is known to protect the mucosa by increasing the prostaglandin concentration.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasia at Yeungnam University Hospital between January 2008 and May 2009. We conducted a matched case-control study to compare the healing rates effected by revaprazan and rabeprazole.

RESULTS

Each group consisted of 30 patients. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Stage S1 disease was observed in 97% and 100% of patients after 8 weeks of treatment in the revaprazan and rabeprazole groups, respectively. In the revaprazan group, only one patient had stage H2 disease: a 54-year-old man with a 5.5-cm lesion after ESD of the ulcer, type IIa early gastric cancer, and adenocarcinoma. No serious adverse effects occurred during the treatment period in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy profiles of revaprazan and rabeprazole are similar for the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of CS-526 in cynomolgus monkeys

In the present study, we evaluated the effect of the novel acid pump antagonist 7-(4-fluorobenzyloxy)-2,3-dimethyl-1-{[(1S,2S)-2-methylcyclopropyl]methyl}-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyridazine (CS-526) on the intragastric acidity of cynomolgus monkeys. The study was performed in a crossover manner with five male animals. CS-526 was administered orally or intravenously at doses of 3.0, 10 and 30 mg/kg, or 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg, respectively. The time period in which the intragastric pH was 4.0 or more (Time(pH > or = 4.0)) and the median pH were calculated for 24 h after the administration. The intragastric pH was elevated after CS-526 treatment. The Time(pH > or = 4.0) was increased in a dose-dependent manner (p = 0.0292) in the oral administration, and the median pH was also increased in a dose-dependent fashion (p = 0.0491) in the intravenous administration. The plasma concentration of CS-526 and its metabolite R-130185 was increased after oral and intravenous administration of CS-526, except for one animal which did not show any detectable amount of R-130185 after intravenous administration at the lowest dose. The area under the time-concentration curve of the active component was increased in the dose proportional manner after oral and intravenous administration. The absolute bioavailability of the active component was estimated to be approximately 1%. Correlation between the pharmacodynamic parameters and the pharmacokinetic parameters was observed in oral (p = 0.0029-0.0745), but not in intravenous administration (p = 0.0558-0.2789). In conclusion, oral and intravenous administration of CS-526 showed inhibition on gastric acidity in cynomolgus monkeys using intragastric pH-metry and some pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were well correlated.