Autosomal dominant mutations affecting X inactivation choice in the mouse

Single-Drop Blood Detection of Common G6PD Mutations in Thailand Based on Allele-Specific Recombinase Polymerase Amplification with CRISPR-Cas12a

Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common inherited enzymopathy. Identification of the G6PD deficiency through screening is crucial to preventing adverse effects associated with hemolytic anemia following antimalarial drug exposure. Therefore, a rapid and precise field-based G6PD deficiency diagnosis is required, particularly in rural regions where malaria is prevalent. The phenotypic diagnosis of the G6PD intermediate has also been a challenging issue due to the overlapping of G6PD activity levels between deficient and normal individuals, leading to a misinterpretation. The availability of an accurate point-of-care testing (POCT) for G6PD genotype diagnosis will therefore increase the opportunity for screening heterozygous cases in a low-resource setting. In this study, an allele-specific recombinase polymerase amplification (AS RPA) with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-Cas12a (CRISPR-Cas12a) was developed as a POCT for accurate diagnosis of common G6PD mutations in Thailand. The AS primers for the wild type and mutant alleles of G6PD MahidolG487A and G6PD ViangchanG871A were designed and used in RPA reactions. Following application of CRISPR-Cas12a systems containing specific protospacer adjacent motif, the targeted RPA amplicons were visualized with the naked eye. Results demonstrated that the G6PD MahidolG487A and G6PD ViangchanG871A assays reached 93.62 and 98.15% sensitivity, respectively. The specificity was 88.71% in MahidolG487A and 99.02% in G6PD ViangchanG871A. The diagnosis accuracy of the G6PD MahidolG487A and G6PD ViangchanG871A assays was 91.67 and 98.72%, respectively. From DNA extraction to detection, the assay required approximately 52 min. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the high performance of an AS RPA with the CRISPR-Cas12a platform for G6PD MahidolG487A and G6PD ViangchanG871A detection assays and the potential use of G6PD genotyping as POCT.

Bayesian modeling of skewed X inactivation in genetically diverse mice identifies a novel Xce allele associated with copy number changes

Female mammals are functional mosaics of their parental X-linked gene expression due to X chromosome inactivation (XCI). This process inactivates one copy of the X chromosome in each cell during embryogenesis and that state is maintained clonally through mitosis. In mice, the choice of which parental X chromosome remains active is determined by the X chromosome controlling element (Xce), which has been mapped to a 176-kb candidate interval. A series of functional Xce alleles has been characterized or inferred for classical inbred strains based on biased, or skewed, inactivation of the parental X chromosomes in crosses between strains. To further explore the function structure basis and location of the Xce, we measured allele-specific expression of X-linked genes in a large population of F1 females generated from Collaborative Cross (CC) strains. Using published sequence data and applying a Bayesian "Pólya urn" model of XCI skew, we report two major findings. First, inter-individual variability in XCI suggests mouse epiblasts contain on average 20-30 cells contributing to brain. Second, CC founder strain NOD/ShiLtJ has a novel and unique functional allele, Xceg, that is the weakest in the Xce allelic series. Despite phylogenetic analysis confirming that NOD/ShiLtJ carries a haplotype almost identical to the well-characterized C57BL/6J (Xceb), we observed unexpected patterns of XCI skewing in females carrying the NOD/ShiLtJ haplotype within the Xce. Copy number variation is common at the Xce locus and we conclude that the observed allelic series is a product of independent and recurring duplications shared between weak Xce alleles.

Developmental regulation of X-chromosome inactivation

With the emergence of sex-determination by sex chromosomes, which differ in composition and number between males and females, appeared the need to equalize X-chromosomal gene dosage between the sexes. Mammals have devised the strategy of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), in which one of the two X-chromosomes is rendered transcriptionally silent in females. In the mouse, the best-studied model organism with respect to XCI, this inactivation process occurs in different forms, imprinted and random, interspersed by periods of X-chromosome reactivation (XCR), which is needed to switch between the different modes of XCI. In this review, I describe the recent advances with respect to the developmental control of XCI and XCR and in particular their link to differentiation and pluripotency. Furthermore, I review the mechanisms, which influence the timing and choice, with which one of the two X-chromosomes is chosen for inactivation during random XCI. This has an impact on how females are mosaics with regard to which X-chromosome is active in different cells, which has implications on the severity of diseases caused by X-linked mutations.

The use of mouse models to study epigenetics

Much of what we know about the role of epigenetics in the determination of phenotype has come from studies of inbred mice. Some unusual expression patterns arising from endogenous and transgenic murine alleles, such as the Agouti coat color alleles, have allowed the study of variegation, variable expressivity, transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, parent-of-origin effects, and position effects. These phenomena have taught us much about gene silencing and the probabilistic nature of epigenetic processes. Based on some of these alleles, large-scale mutagenesis screens have broadened our knowledge of epigenetic control by identifying and characterizing novel genes involved in these processes.

Genetic architecture of skewed X inactivation in the laboratory mouse

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the mammalian mechanism of dosage compensation that balances X-linked gene expression between the sexes. Early during female development, each cell of the embryo proper independently inactivates one of its two parental X-chromosomes. In mice, the choice of which X chromosome is inactivated is affected by the genotype of a cis-acting locus, the X-chromosome controlling element (Xce). Xce has been localized to a 1.9 Mb interval within the X-inactivation center (Xic), yet its molecular identity and mechanism of action remain unknown. We combined genotype and sequence data for mouse stocks with detailed phenotyping of ten inbred strains and with the development of a statistical model that incorporates phenotyping data from multiple sources to disentangle sources of XCI phenotypic variance in natural female populations on X inactivation. We have reduced the Xce candidate 10-fold to a 176 kb region located approximately 500 kb proximal to Xist. We propose that structural variation in this interval explains the presence of multiple functional Xce alleles in the genus Mus. We have identified a new allele, Xce^e present in Mus musculus and a possible sixth functional allele in Mus spicilegus. We have also confirmed a parent-of-origin effect on X inactivation choice and provide evidence that maternal inheritance magnifies the skewing associated with strong Xce alleles. Based on the phylogenetic analysis of 155 laboratory strains and wild mice we conclude that Xce^a is either a derived allele that arose concurrently with the domestication of fancy mice but prior the derivation of most classical inbred strains or a rare allele in the wild. Furthermore, we have found that despite the presence of multiple haplotypes in the wild Mus musculus domesticus has only one functional Xce allele, Xce^b. Lastly, we conclude that each mouse taxa examined has a different functional Xce allele.

Although mammalian females have two X chromosomes in each cell, only one is functional, while gene expression from the other is silenced through a process called X chromosome inactivation. Little is known about the early stages of this process including how one parental X chromosome is inactivated over the other on a cell-by-cell basis. It has been shown, however, that certain inbred mouse strains are functionally different at a locus that controls this choice that provides an opportunity to identify the locus and determine its molecular mechanism. This has been the goal of many researchers over the past 40 years with incremental success. Here we took advantage of new mouse genotype and whole genome sequencing data to pinpoint the locus controlling choice. Our results identified a smaller region on the X chromosome that contains large duplicated sequences. We propose an explanation for multiple functional alleles in mouse and provide insight into the possible molecular mechanism of X chromosome inactivation choice. Our evolutionary analysis reveals why functional diversity at this locus appears to be common in laboratory mice and offers an explanation as to why we do not see this level of diversity in humans.

X-inactivation, imprinting, and long noncoding RNAs in health and disease

X chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting are classic epigenetic processes that cause disease when not appropriately regulated in mammals. Whereas X chromosome inactivation evolved to solve the problem of gene dosage, the purpose of genomic imprinting remains controversial. Nevertheless, the two phenomena are united by allelic control of large gene clusters, such that only one copy of a gene is expressed in every cell. Allelic regulation poses significant challenges because it requires coordinated long-range control in cis and stable propagation over time. Long noncoding RNAs have emerged as a common theme, and their contributions to diseases of imprinting and the X chromosome have become apparent. Here, we review recent advances in basic biology, the connections to disease, and preview potential therapeutic strategies for future development.

Nonrandom X chromosome inactivation is influenced by multiple regions on the murine X chromosome

During the development of female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated, serving as a dosage-compensation mechanism to equalize the expression of X-linked genes in females and males. While the choice of which X chromosome to inactivate is normally random, X chromosome inactivation can be skewed in F1 hybrid mice, as determined by alleles at the X chromosome controlling element (Xce), a locus defined genetically by Cattanach over 40 years ago. Four Xce alleles have been defined in inbred mice in order of the tendency of the X chromosome to remain active: Xce(a) < Xce(b) < Xce(c) < Xce(d). While the identity of the Xce locus remains unknown, previous efforts to map sequences responsible for the Xce effect in hybrid mice have localized the Xce to candidate regions that overlap the X chromosome inactivation center (Xic), which includes the Xist and Tsix genes. Here, we have intercrossed 129S1/SvImJ, which carries the Xce(a) allele, and Mus musculus castaneus EiJ, which carries the Xce(c) allele, to generate recombinant lines with single or double recombinant breakpoints near or within the Xce candidate region. In female progeny of 129S1/SvImJ females mated to recombinant males, we have measured the X chromosome inactivation ratio using allele-specific expression assays of genes on the X chromosome. We have identified regions, both proximal and distal to Xist/Tsix, that contribute to the choice of which X chromosome to inactivate, indicating that multiple elements on the X chromosome contribute to the Xce.

Autosomal monoallelic expression in the mouse

BACKGROUND

Random monoallelic expression defines an unusual class of genes displaying random choice for expression between the maternal and paternal alleles. Once established, the allele-specific expression pattern is stably maintained and mitotically inherited. Examples of random monoallelic genes include those found on the X-chromosome and a subset of autosomal genes, which have been most extensively studied in humans. Here, we report a genome-wide analysis of random monoallelic expression in the mouse. We used high density mouse genome polymorphism mapping arrays to assess allele-specific expression in clonal cell lines derived from heterozygous mouse strains.

RESULTS

Over 1,300 autosomal genes were assessed for allele-specific expression, and greater than 10% of them showed random monoallelic expression. When comparing mouse and human, the number of autosomal orthologs demonstrating random monoallelic expression in both organisms was greater than would be expected by chance. Random monoallelic expression on the mouse autosomes is broadly similar to that in human cells: it is widespread throughout the genome, lacks chromosome-wide coordination, and varies between cell types. However, for some mouse genes, there appears to be skewing, in some ways resembling skewed X-inactivation, wherein one allele is more frequently active.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that autosomal random monoallelic expression was present at least as far back as the last common ancestor of rodents and primates. Random monoallelic expression can lead to phenotypic variation beyond the phenotypic variation dictated by genotypic variation. Thus, it is important to take into account random monoallelic expression when examining genotype-phenotype correlation.

Familial skewed X-chromosome inactivation linked to a component of the cohesin complex, SA2

The gene dosage inequality between females with two X-chromosomes and males with one is compensated for by X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), which ensures the silencing of one X in every somatic cell of female mammals. XCI in humans results in a mosaic of two cell populations: those expressing the maternal X-chromosome and those expressing the paternal X-chromosome. We have previously shown that the degree of mosaicism (the X-inactivation pattern) in a Canadian family is directly related to disease severity in female carriers of the X-linked recessive bleeding disorder, haemophilia A. The distribution of X-inactivation patterns in this family was consistent with a genetic trait having a co-dominant mode of inheritance, suggesting that XCI choice may not be completely random. To identify genetic elements that could be responsible for biased XCI choice, a linkage analysis was undertaken using an approach tailored to accommodate the continuous nature of the X-inactivation pattern phenotype in the Canadian family. Several X-linked regions were identified, one of which overlaps with a region previously found to be linked to familial skewed XCI. SA2, a component of the cohesin complex is identified as a candidate gene that could participate in XCI through its association with CTCF.

Domain-specific response of imprinted genes to reduced DNMT1

Imprinted genes are expressed in a monoallelic, parent-of-origin-specific manner. Clusters of imprinted genes are regulated by imprinting control regions (ICRs) characterized by DNA methylation of one allele. This methylation is critical for imprinting; a reduction in the DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 causes a widespread loss of imprinting. To better understand the role of DNA methylation in the regulation of imprinting, we characterized the effects of Dnmt1 mutations on the expression of a panel of imprinted genes in the embryo and placenta. We found striking differences among imprinted domains. The Igf2 and Peg3 domains showed imprinting perturbations with both null and partial loss-of-function mutations, and both domains had pairs of coordinately regulated genes with opposite responses to loss of DNMT1 function, suggesting these domains employ similar regulatory mechanisms. Genes in the Kcnq1 domain were less sensitive to the absence of DNMT1. Cdkn1c exhibited imprinting perturbations only in null mutants, while Kcnq1 and Ascl2 were largely unaffected by a loss of DNMT1 function. These results emphasize the critical role for DNA methylation in imprinting and reveal the different ways it controls gene expression.

Self-assembly and DNA binding of the blocking factor in x chromosome inactivation

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the phenomenon occurring in female mammals whereby dosage compensation of X-linked genes is obtained by transcriptional silencing of one of their two X chromosomes, randomly chosen during early embryo development. The earliest steps of random X-inactivation, involving counting of the X chromosomes and choice of the active and inactive X, are still not understood. To explain “counting and choice,” the longstanding hypothesis is that a molecular complex, a “blocking factor” (BF), exists. The BF is present in a single copy and can randomly bind to just one X per cell which is protected from inactivation, as the second X is inactivated by default. In such a picture, the missing crucial step is to explain how the molecular complex is self-assembled, why only one is formed, and how it binds only one X. We answer these questions within the framework of a schematic Statistical Physics model, investigated by Monte Carlo computer simulations. We show that a single complex is assembled as a result of a thermodynamic process relying on a phase transition occurring in the system which spontaneously breaks the symmetry between the X's. We discuss, then, the BF interaction with X chromosomes. The thermodynamics of the mechanism that directs the two chromosomes to opposite fates could be, thus, clarified. The insights on the self-assembling and X binding properties of the BF are used to derive a quantitative scenario of biological implications describing current experimental evidences on “counting and choice.”

In mammals, female cells silence one of their two X chromosomes to equalize X products with respect to males. The mechanism whereby cells count their X's and randomly choose the one to inactivate is, though, one of the most mysterious aspects of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). The longstanding hypothesis is that a molecular complex, a “blocking factor” (BF), exists: the BF is present in a single copy and can randomly bind to just one X per cell which is protected from inactivation, as the second X is inactivated by default. We add here a missing crucial step to such a picture: we explain, on a thermodynamic ground, why only one complex is formed in the cell, how it is self-assembled and how it selectively binds DNA recognition sequences. Such a process, leading to the spontaneous breaking of the binding symmetry of two equivalent targets, results from collective behavior at a molecular level whose general features are independent from the ultimate biochemical molecular details. It embodies, thus, a new general stochastic regulatory mechanism which could be relevant to a broad class of cell processes involving a random switch.

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in female octogenarians, nanogenarians, and centenarians

BACKGROUND

Age-related skewing of X-chromosome inactivation leading to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency in elderly women in a population with prevalent G6PD gene mutations was investigated.

METHODS

G6PD activity was measured biochemically. G6PD mutations were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and allele-specific extension, and analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and Sequenom MassARRAY. X-chromosome inactivation was quantified by semiquantitative PCR for the HUMARA gene, before and after HpaII digestion.

RESULTS

In 173 women (median age: 90 years; range, 80-107 years), 18 heterozygotes for G6PD mutations were identified. Three heterozygotes were G6PD deficient, owing to skewed X-chromosome inactivation affecting the wild-type allele. Fifteen heterozygotes, with skewing apparently affecting the mutant alleles, had normal but significantly lower G6PD levels. At 1.73%, G6PD deficiency was significantly more frequent than expected from population screening at birth.

CONCLUSION

Due to skewed X-chromosome inactivation, elderly women in populations with prevalent G6PD mutations are at risk of G6PD deficiency.

Uncovering the uncharacterized and unexpected: unbiased phenotype-driven screens in the mouse

Phenotype-based chemical mutagenesis screens for mouse mutations have undergone a transformation in the past five years from a potential approach to a practical tool. This change has been driven by the relative ease of identifying causative mutations now that the complete genome sequence is available. These unbiased screens make it possible to identify genes, gene functions and processes that are uniquely important to mammals. In addition, because chemical mutagenesis generally induces point mutations, these alleles often uncover previously unappreciated functions of known proteins. Here we provide examples of the success stories from forward genetic screens, emphasizing the examples that illustrate the discovery of mammalian-specific processes that could not be discovered in other model organisms. As the efficiency of sequencing and mutation detection continues to improve, it is likely that forward genetic screens will provide an even more important part of the repertoire of mouse genetics in the future.

X chromosome-inactivation patterns of 1,005 phenotypically unaffected females

X-chromosome inactivation is widely believed to be random in early female development and to result in a mosaic distribution of cells, approximately half with the paternally derived X chromosome inactive and half with the maternally derived X chromosome inactive. Significant departures from such a random pattern are hallmarks of a variety of clinical states, including being carriers for severe X-linked diseases or X-chromosome cytogenetic abnormalities. To evaluate the significance of skewed patterns of X inactivation, we examined patterns of X inactivation in a population of >1,000 phenotypically unaffected females. The data demonstrate that only a very small proportion of unaffected females show significantly skewed inactivation, especially during the neonatal period. By comparison with this data set, the degree of skewed inactivation in a given individual can now be quantified and evaluated for its potential clinical significance.

Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome

Mammalian females have two X chromosomes and males have only one. This has led to the evolution of special mechanisms of dosage compensation. The inactivation of one X chromosome in females equalizes gene expression between the sexes. This process of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a remarkable example of long-range, monoallelic gene silencing and facultative heterochromatin formation, and the questions surrounding it have fascinated biologists for decades. How does the inactivation of more than a thousand genes on one X chromosome take place while the other X chromosome, present in the same nucleus, remains genetically active? What are the underlying mechanisms that trigger the initial differential treatment of the two X chromosomes? How is this differential treatment maintained once it has been established, and how are some genes able to escape the process? Does the mechanism of X inactivation vary between species and even between lineages? In this review, X inactivation is considered in evolutionary terms, and we discuss recent insights into the epigenetic changes and developmental timing of this process. We also review the discovery and possible implications of a second form of dosage compensation in mammals that deals with the unique, potentially haploinsufficient, status of the X chromosome with respect to autosomal gene expression.

Genetic control of X chromosome inactivation in mice: definition of the Xce candidate interval

In early mammalian development, one of the two X chromosomes is silenced in each female cell as a result of X chromosome inactivation, the mammalian dosage compensation mechanism. In the mouse epiblast, the choice of which chromosome is inactivated is essentially random, but can be biased by alleles at the X-linked X controlling element (Xce). Although this locus was first described nearly four decades ago, the identity and precise genomic localization of Xce remains elusive. Within the X inactivation center region of the X chromosome, previous linkage disequilibrium studies comparing strains of known Xce genotypes have suggested that Xce is physically distinct from Xist, although this has not yet been established by genetic mapping or progeny testing. In this report, we used quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping strategies to define the minimal Xce candidate interval. Subsequent analysis of recombinant chromosomes allowed for the establishment of a maximum 1.85-Mb candidate region for the Xce locus. Finally, we use QTL approaches in an effort to identify additional modifiers of the X chromosome choice, as we have previously demonstrated that choice in Xce heterozygous females is significantly influenced by genetic variation present on autosomes (Chadwick and Willard 2005). We did not identify any autosomal loci with significant associations and thus show conclusively that Xce is the only major locus to influence X inactivation patterns in the crosses analyzed. This study provides a foundation for future analyses into the genetic control of X chromosome inactivation and defines a 1.85-Mb interval encompassing all the major elements of the Xce locus.

X-tra! X-tra! News from the mouse X chromosome

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the phenomenon through which one of the two X chromosomes in female mammals is silenced to achieve dosage compensation with males. XCI is a highly complex, tightly controlled and developmentally regulated process. The mouse undergoes two forms of XCI: imprinted, which occurs in all cells of the preimplantation embryo and in the extraembryonic lineage, and random, which occurs in somatic cells after implantation. This review presents results and hypotheses that have recently been proposed concerning important aspects of both imprinted and random XCI in mice. We focus on how imprinted XCI occurs during preimplantation development, including a brief discussion of the debate as to when silencing initiates. We also discuss regulation of random XCI, focusing on the requirement for Tsix antisense transcription through the Xist locus, on the regulation of Xist chromatin structure by Tsix and on the effect of Tsix regulatory elements on choice and counting. Finally, we review exciting new data revealing that X chromosomes co-localize during random XCI. To conclude, we highlight other aspects of X-linked gene regulation that make it a suitable model for epigenetics at work.

Abnormal X: autosome ratio, but normal X chromosome inactivation in human triploid cultures

BACKGROUND

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is that aspect of mammalian dosage compensation that brings about equivalence of X-linked gene expression between females and males by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes (Xi) in normal female cells, leaving them with a single active X (Xa) as in male cells. In cells with more than two X's, but a diploid autosomal complement, all X's but one, Xa, are inactivated. This phenomenon is commonly thought to suggest 1) that normal development requires a ratio of one Xa per diploid autosomal set, and 2) that an early event in XCI is the marking of one X to be active, with remaining X's becoming inactivated by default.

RESULTS

Triploids provide a test of these ideas because the ratio of one Xa per diploid autosomal set cannot be achieved, yet this abnormal ratio should not necessarily affect the one-Xa choice mechanism for XCI. Previous studies of XCI patterns in murine triploids support the single-Xa model, but human triploids mostly have two-Xa cells, whether they are XXX or XXY. The XCI patterns we observe in fibroblast cultures from different XXX human triploids suggest that the two-Xa pattern of XCI is selected for, and may have resulted from rare segregation errors or Xi reactivation.

CONCLUSION

The initial X inactivation pattern in human triploids, therefore, is likely to resemble the pattern that predominates in murine triploids, i.e., a single Xa, with the remaining X's inactive. Furthermore, our studies of XIST RNA accumulation and promoter methylation suggest that the basic features of XCI are normal in triploids despite the abnormal X:autosome ratio.

X chromosomes alternate between two states prior to random X-inactivation

Early in the development of female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is silenced in half of cells and the other X chromosome is silenced in the remaining half. The basis of this apparent randomness is not understood. We show that before X-inactivation, the two X chromosomes appear to exist in distinct states that correspond to their fates as the active and inactive X chromosomes. Xist and Tsix, noncoding RNAs that control X chromosome fates upon X-inactivation, also determine the states of the X chromosomes prior to X-inactivation. In wild-type ES cells, X chromosomes switch between states; among the progeny of a single cell, a given X chromosome exhibits each state with equal frequency. We propose a model in which the concerted switching of homologous X chromosomes between mutually exclusive future active and future inactive states provides the basis for the apparently random silencing of one X chromosome in female cells.

During female mammalian development, one of the two X chromosomes in each cell is inactivated. Prior to X-inactivation, these chromosomes appear to exist in distinct states that correspond to their fates.

Random X-chromosome inactivation: skewing lessons for mice and men

The mammalian X-chromosome exists in two flavors, active and inactive, in each cell of the adult female. This phenomenon originates from the process of random choice occurring early in development in a small number of progenitor cells in which the decision is made to inactivate either one or the other X chromosome on a cell-autonomous basis. Once made, this initial decision is irreversible, although exceptions exist in specific chromosomal territories and cell lineages. Recent findings implicate various factors, including non-coding RNAs and chromatin modification complexes, as effectors in the initiation and maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation. The functional redundancy of such factors almost certainly plays an important role in the stability of the inactive X. Studying skewing or bias opens an important opportunity for understanding facets of the random choice process.

Developmental profile of H19 differentially methylated domain (DMD) deletion alleles reveals multiple roles of the DMD in regulating allelic expression and DNA methylation at the imprinted H19/Igf2 locus

The differentially methylated domain (DMD) of the mouse H19 gene is a methylation-sensitive insulator that blocks access of the Igf2 gene to shared enhancers on the maternal allele and inactivates H19 expression on the methylated paternal allele. By analyzing H19 DMD deletion alleles H19DeltaDMD and H19Delta3.8kb-5'H19 in pre- and postimplantation embryos, we show that the DMD exhibits positive transcriptional activity and is required for H19 expression in blastocysts and full activation of H19 during subsequent development. We also show that the DMD is required to establish Igf2 imprinting by blocking access to shared enhancers when Igf2 monoallelic expression is initiated in postimplantation embryos and that the single remaining CTCF site of the H19DeltaDMD allele is unable to provide this function. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that sequence outside of the DMD can attract some paternal-allele-specific CpG methylation 5' of H19 in preimplantation embryos, although this methylation is not maintained during postimplantation in the absence of the DMD. Finally, we report a conditional allele floxing the 1.6-kb sequence deleted from the H19DeltaDMD allele and demonstrate that the DMD is required to maintain repression of the maternal Igf2 allele and the full activity of the paternal Igf2 allele in neonatal liver.

A SAGE approach to identifying novel trans-acting factors involved in the X inactivation process

X chromosome inactivation ensures the dosage compensation of X-linked genes in XX females compared to their XY male counterpart. It is characterised by the specific recruitment of an inhibitory ribonucleoprotein complex involving the non-coding Xist RNA to the presumptive inactive X chromosome and associated chromatin modifications, which result in the transcriptional silencing of the X chromosome. As an approach to the identification of some of the potential molecular players in this process we have performed comparative transcriptional profiling of mouse 6.5-dpc (days post-coitum) female and male embryos using a modified SAGE (Serial analysis of gene expression) technique which allows the analysis of small quantities of biological material. At 6.5 dpc, a moment when random X inactivation of embryonic tissues has just been achieved, some two hundred transcripts that were significantly enriched in the female gastrula compared to its male counterpart could be identified. The validation of an association with the X inactivation process of a subset of these transcripts has been studied, ex vivo, in differentiating female and male ES cells and in female ES cells in which the establishment of X inactivation is interrupted through the post-transcriptional inhibition of Xist synthesis.

Genetic and parent-of-origin influences on X chromosome choice in Xce heterozygous mice

X chromosome inactivation is unique among dosage compensation mechanisms in that the two X chromosomes in females are treated differently within the same cell; one X chromosome is stably silenced while the other remains active. It is widely believed that, when X inactivation is initiated, each cell makes a random choice of which X chromosome will be silenced. In mice, only one genetic locus, the X-linked X controlling element (X ce), is known to influence this choice, because animals that are heterozygous at X ce have X-inactivation patterns that differ markedly from a mean of 0.50. To document other genetic and epigenetic influences on choice, we have performed a population-based study of the effect of X ce genotype on X-inactivation patterns. In B 6 CAST F(1) females (X ce(b)/X ce(c)), the X-inactivation pattern followed a symmetric distribution with a mean of 0.29 (SD=0.08). Surprisingly, however, in a population of X ce(b)/X ce(c) heterozygous B 6 CAST F(2) females, we observed significant differences in both the mean (p=0.004) and variance (p=0.004) of the X-inactivation patterns. This finding is incompatible with a single-locus model and suggests that additional genetic factors also influence X chromosome choice. We show that both parent-of-origin and naturally occurring genetic variation at autosomal loci contribute to these differences. Taken together, these data reveal further genetic complexity in this epigenetic control pathway.

SILENCING OF THE MAMMALIAN X CHROMOSOME

Mammalian X chromosome inactivation is one of the most striking examples of epigenetic gene regulation. Early in development one of the pair of approximately 160-Mb X chromosomes is chosen to be silenced, and this silencing is then stably inherited through subsequent somatic cell divisions. Recent advances have revealed many of the chromatin changes that underlie this stable silencing of an entire chromosome. The key initiator of these changes is a functional RNA, XIST, which is transcribed from, and associates with, the inactive X chromosome, although the mechanism of association with the inactive X and recruitment of facultative heterochromatin remain to be elucidated. This review describes the unique evolutionary history and resulting genomic structure of the X chromosome as well as the current understanding of the factors and events involved in silencing an X chromosome in mammals.

Recognition and modification of seX chromosomes

Flies, worms and mammals employ dosage compensation complexes that alter chromatin or chromosome structure to equalize X-linked gene expression between the sexes. Recent work has improved our understanding of how dosage compensation complexes achieve X chromosome-wide association and has provided significant insight into the epigenetic modifications directed by these complexes to modulate gene expression. In flies, the prevailing view that dosage compensation complexes assemble on the X chromosome at approximately 35 chromatin-entry sites and then spread in cis to cover the chromosome has been re-evaluated in light of the evidence that these chromatin-entry sites are not required for localization of the complex. By contrast, identification of discrete recruitment elements indicates that nucleation at and spread from a limited number of sites directs dosage compensation complex localization on the worm X-chromosome. Studies in flies and mammals have extended our understanding of how ribonucleoprotein complexes are used to modify X chromatin, for either activation or repression of transcription. Finally, evidence from mammals suggests that the chromatin modifications that mediate dosage compensation are very dynamic, because they are established, reversed and re-established early in development.

X chromosome reactivation and regulation in cloned embryos

Somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos exhibit extensive epigenetic abnormalities, including aberrant methylation and abnormal imprinted gene expression. In this study, a thorough analysis of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) was performed in both preimplantation and postimplantation nuclear transfer embryos. Cloned blastocysts reactivated the inactive somatic X chromosome, possibly in a gradient fashion. Analysis of XCI by Xist RNA and Eed protein localization revealed heterogeneity within cloned embryos, with some cells successfully inactivating an X chromosome and others failing to do so. Additionally, a significant proportion of cells contained more than two X chromosomes, which correlated with an increased incidence of tetraploidy. Imprinted XCI, normally found in preimplantation embryos and extraembryonic tissues, was not observed in blastocysts or placentae from later stage clones, although fetuses recapitulated the Xce effect. We conclude that, although SCNT embryos can reactivate, count, and inactivate X chromosomes, they are not able to regulate XCI consistently. These results illustrate the heterogeneity of epigenetic changes found in cloned embryos.

An N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea screen for genes involved in variegation in the mouse

We have developed a sensitized screen to identify genes involved in gene silencing, using random N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis on mice carrying a variegating GFP transgene. The dominant screen has produced six mutant lines, including both suppressors and enhancers of variegation. All are semidominant and five of the six are homozygous embryonic lethal. In one case, the homozygous lethality depends on sex: homozygous females die at midgestation and display abnormal DNA methylation of the X chromosome, whereas homozygous males are viable. Linkage analysis reveals that the mutations map to unique chromosomal locations. We have studied the effect of five of the mutations on expression of an endogenous allele known to be sensitive to epigenetic state, agouti viable yellow. In all cases, there is an effect on penetrance, and in most cases, parent of origin and sex-specific effects are detected. This screen has identified genes that are involved in epigenetic reprogramming of the genome, and the behavior of the mutant lines suggests a common mechanism between X inactivation and transgene and retrotransposon silencing. Our findings raise the possibility that the presence or absence of the X chromosome in mammals affects the establishment of the epigenetic state at autosomal loci by acting as a sink for proteins involved in gene silencing. The study demonstrates the power of sensitized screens in the mouse not only for the discovery of novel genes involved in a particular process but also for the elucidation of the biology of that process.

Reduced proportion of Purkinje cells expressing paternally derived mutant Mecp2308 allele in female mouse cerebellum is not due to a skewed primary pattern of X-chromosome inactivation

Rett syndrome (RTT) is an X-linked disorder caused by mutations in the methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene. The pattern of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is thought to play a role in phenotypic severity. In the present study, patterns of XCI were assessed by lacZ staining of embryos and adult brains of mice heterozygous for a X-linked Hmgcr-nls-lacZ transgene on a mutant mouse model of RTT. We found that there was no difference between the lacZ staining patterns in the brain of wild-type and heterozygous mutant embryos at embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) suggesting that Mecp2 has no effect on the primary pattern of XCI. At 20 weeks of age, there was no significant difference between XCI patterns in the Purkinje cells in the cerebellum of heterozygous mutant and wild-type mice when the mutant allele was inherited from the mother. However, when the mutant allele was paternally inherited, a significant difference was detected. Thus, parental origin of the mutation may have a bearing on phenotype through XCI patterns. An estimation of the Purkinje cell precursor number based on XCI mosaicism revealed that, when the mutation was paternally inherited, the precursor number was less than that in the wild-type mice. Therefore, it is likely that the number of precursor cells allocated to the Purkinje cell lineage is affected by a paternally inherited mutation in Mecp2. We also observed that the pattern of XCI in cultured fibroblasts was significantly correlated with patterns in the Purkinje cells in mutant animals but not in wild-type mice.

Twin study of genetic and aging effects on X chromosome inactivation

To investigate the genetic influence on X chromosome inactivation and on age-related skewing of X inactivation, in particular, we analysed the X inactivation pattern (XIP) in peripheral blood cells from 118 young monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs (18-53 years), 82 elderly MZ twin pairs (55-94 years), 146 young dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs (20-54 years) and 112 elderly DZ twin pairs (64-95 years). Elderly twins had a higher frequency of skewed X inactivation (34%) than young twins (15%) (P<0.001). Our data suggest that the increase in skewing occurs after age 50-60 years. The intraclass correlation was 0.61 and 0.58 in young and elderly MZ twin pairs, and 0.08 and 0.09 in young and elderly DZ twin pairs. Biometric analysis showed that dominant genetic effects accounted for 63 and 58% of the variance of XIP in the young and elderly twin pairs, respectively. The dominant genetic effect and the shared environment for monochorionic MZ twins may explain the high intraclass correlation for the MZ twin pairs compared to the DZ twin pairs. We did not observe a significant decrease in the intraclass correlation in elderly MZ twins compared to young MZ twins, which would be expected if age-related skewing were due to stochastic factors. We conclude that the increased skewing with age implies that a genetically dependent selection of blood cells take place.

Familial nonrandom inactivation linked to the X inactivation centre in heterozygotes manifesting haemophilia A

A basic tenet of the Lyon hypothesis is that X inactivation occurs randomly with respect to parental origin of the X chromosome. Yet, nonrandom patterns of X inactivation are common - often ascertained in women who manifest recessive X-linked disorders despite being heterozygous for the mutation. Usually, the cause of skewing is cell selection disfavouring one of the cell lineages created by random X inactivation. We have identified a three generation kindred, with three females who have haemophilia A because of extreme skewing of X inactivation. Although they have both normal and mutant factor VIII (FVIII) alleles, only the mutant one is transcribed; and, they share an XIST allele that is never transcribed. The skewing in this case seems to result from an abnormality in the initial choice process, which prevents the chromosome bearing the mutant FVIII allele from being an inactive X.

Role of H19 3' sequences in controlling H19 and Igf2 imprinting and expression

The regulation of H19 and Igf2 imprinting and expression depends on common elements. Using comparative analysis between human and mouse, we identified conserved regions 3' of the H19 transcription unit, including the H19/Igf2 endodermal enhancers and elements within a 4.2-kb domain between the H19 transcription unit and the enhancers. Transgene experiments implicate these elements in imprinting regulation. To establish whether they are required at the endogenous locus, first we replaced the endodermal enhancers with the alpha-fetoprotein endodermal enhancers (H19Afp). Second, we deleted the 4.2-kb region (H19delta4.2). Our analysis revealed that H19 and Igf2 imprinting and tissue-specific expression were maintained for both mutations, except for a slight reduction in paternal Igf2 expression from the H19Afp allele in liver. These results demonstrate that the H19 insulator can interact with heterologous enhancers to imprint Igf2. Furthermore, for H19, chromatin context or additional sequences possibly compensate for loss of conserved 3' elements.

Tsix transcription- versus RNA-based mechanisms in Xist repression and epigenetic choice

Recent inquiries have revealed a surprisingly large number (>2500) of naturally occurring antisense transcripts, but their function remains largely undiscovered. A better understanding of antisense mechanisms is clearly needed because of their potentially diverse roles in gene regulation and disease. A well-documented case occurs in X inactivation, the mechanism by which X-linked gene expression is equalized between XX females and XY males. The antisense gene Tsix determines X chromosome choice and represses the noncoding silencer, Xist. In principle, Tsix action may involve RNA, the act of transcription, or local chromatin. Here, we create novel Tsix alleles to distinguish transcription- versus RNA-based mechanisms. When Tsix transcription is terminated before Xist (TsixTRAP), Tsix cannot block Xist upregulation, suggesting the importance of overlapping antisense transcription. To separate the act of transcription from RNA, we knocked in Tsix cDNA in the reverse orientation (Tsix(cDNA)) to restore RNA levels in cis without concurrent transcription across Xist. However, Tsix(cDNA) cannot complement TsixTRAP. Surprisingly, both mutations disrupt choice, indicating that this epigenetic step requires transcription. We conclude that the processed antisense RNA does not act alone and that Tsix function specifically requires antiparallel transcription through Xist. A mechanism of transcription-based feedback regulation is proposed.

Epigenetic Inheritance and the Intergenerational Transfer of Experience

Currently, behavioral development is thought to result from the interplay among genetic inheritance, congenital characteristics, cultural contexts, and parental practices as they directly impact the individual. Evolutionary ecology points to another contributor, epigenetic inheritance, the transmission to offspring of parental phenotypic responses to environmental challenges-even when the young do not experience the challenges themselves. Genetic inheritance is not altered, gene expression is. Organismic pathways for such transmission exist. Maternal stress during the latter half of a daughter's gestation may affect not only the daughter's but also grand-offspring's physical growth. The author argues that temperamental variation may be influenced in the same way. Implications for theory and research design are presented along with testable predictions.

Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture

Preimplantation development is a period of dynamic epigenetic change that begins with remodeling of egg and sperm genomes, and ends with implantation. During this time, parental-specific imprinting marks are maintained to direct appropriate imprinted gene expression. We previously demonstrated that H19 imprinting could be lost during preimplantation development under certain culture conditions. To define the lability of genomic imprints during this dynamic period and to determine whether loss of imprinting continues at later stages of development, imprinted gene expression and methylation were examined after in vitro preimplantation culture. Following culture in Whitten's medium, the normally silent paternal H19 allele was aberrantly expressed and undermethylated. However, only a subset of individual cultured blastocysts (∼65%) exhibited biallelic expression, while others maintained imprinted H19 expression. Loss of H19 imprinting persisted in mid-gestation conceptuses. Placental tissues displayed activation of the normally silent allele for H19, Ascl2, Snrpn, Peg3 and Xist while in the embryo proper imprinted expression for the most part was preserved. Loss of imprinted expression was associated with a decrease in methylation at the H19 and Snrpn imprinting control regions. These results indicate that tissues of trophectoderm origin are unable to restore genomic imprints and suggest that mechanisms that safeguard imprinting might be more robust in the embryo than in the placenta.

Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation

X inactivation is the silencing one of the two X chromosomes in XX female mammals. Initiation of this process during early development is controlled by the X-inactivation centre, a complex locus that determines how many, and which, X chromosomes will be inactivated. It also produces the Xist transcript, a remarkable RNA that coats the X chromosome in cis and triggers its silencing. Xist RNA coating induces a cascade of chromatin changes on the X chromosome, including the recruitment of Polycomb group proteins. This results in an inactive state that is initially labile, but may be further locked in by epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation. In mice, X inactivation has recently been found to be much more dynamic than previously thought during early pre-implantation development. The paternal X chromosome is initially inactivated in all cells of cleavage-stage embryos and then selectively reactivated in the subset of cells that will form the embryo, with random X inactivation occurring thereafter.

Nonrandom X chromosome inactivation in mouse embryos carrying Searle's T(X;16)16H translocation visualized using X-linked LACZ and GFP transgenes

Only the morphologically normal X chromosome is inactivated in female mice heterozygous for Searle's X-autosome translocation, T(X;16)16H. Here we performed a visual study of the primary and secondary events that culminate in the completely nonrandom inactivation of the X in female embryos having this translocation. The data we have obtained so far indicate that the initial choice of the future inactive X chromosome is biased, with the degree of skewing somewhere between 70:30% and 90:10% in favor of the morphologically normal X chromosome. The majority of genetically unbalanced cells that inactivate a translocated X chromosome are quickly eliminated from the embryo proper by E8.5, although the survival of such cells is sporadically observed thereafter. The initial nonrandom choice demonstrated in this study supports the contention that the T(X;16)16H translocation disrupts one of the loci involved in the randomness of the choice of the future inactive X chromosome. Although the HMG-LACZ transgene in H253 stock mice is an excellent marker of X chromosome inactivation, the present study suggests that it is infrequently de-repressed on the inactive X chromosome.

Fragile-X syndrome and skewed X-chromosome inactivation within a family: a female member with complete inactivation of the functional X chromosome

Fragile X syndrome is the most common form of inherited mental retardation. It is caused by the increase in length of a stretch of CGG triplet repeats within the FMR1 gene. A full mutation (> 200 repeats) leads to methylation of the CpG island and silencing of the FMR1 gene. We present here two sisters that are compound heterozygotes for a full mutation and a 53 repeat intermediate allele, one of them showing mental retardation and clinical features of an affected male (speech delay, hyperactivity, large ears, prominent jaw, gaze aversion), while the other is borderline normal (mild delay). Southern blot and FMRP expression analysis showed that the sister with mental retardation had the normal FMR1 gene totally methylated and no detectable protein, while her sister had 70% of her cells with the normal FMR1 gene unmethylated and normal FMRP levels. We found that the observed phenotypic differences between both sisters who are cytogenetically normal, are caused by extreme skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Analysis of the extended family showed that most of the other female family members that carry a pre-mutation or a full mutation showed some degree of skewing in their X-chromosome inactivation. The presence of several family members with skewed X inactivation and the direction and degree of skewing is inconsistent with a mere selection during development, and suggests a genetic origin for this phenomenon.

Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning

Germ cells undergo epigenetic modifications as they develop, which suggests that they may be ideal donors for nuclear transfer (cloning). In this study, nuclei from confirmed embryonic germ cells were used as donors to determine whether they are competent for cloning and at which stage they are most competent. Embryos cloned from migrating 10.5-days-postcoitum (dpc) primordial germ cells (PGCs) showed normal morphological development to midgestation but died shortly thereafter. In contrast, embryos cloned from later-stage germ cells were developmentally delayed at midgestation. Thus, donor germ cell age inversely correlated with the developmental stage attained by cloned embryos. The methylation status of the H19- and Snrpn-imprinting control regions in germ cell clones paralleled that of the donors, and revealed that demethylation, or erasure of imprints, was already initiated in PGCs at 10.5 dpc and was complete by 13.5 dpc. Similarly, clones derived from male 15.5-dpc germ cells showed increased methylation correlating with the initiation of de novo methylation that resets imprints at this stage, and clones from neonatal germ cells showed nearly complete methylation in the H19 imprinting control region. These results indicate that the epigenetic state of the donor nucleus is retained in cloned embryos, and that germ cells are therefore inadequate nuclear donors for cloning because they are either erasing or resetting epigenetic patterns.

An N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis screen for epigenetic mutations in the mouse

The mammalian epigenetic phenomena of X inactivation and genomic imprinting are incompletely understood. X inactivation equalizes X-linked expression between males and females by silencing genes on one X chromosome during female embryogenesis. Genomic imprinting functionally distinguishes the parental genomes, resulting in parent-specific monoallelic expression of particular genes. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis was used in the mouse to screen for mutations in novel factors involved in X inactivation. Previously, we reported mutant pedigrees identified through this screen that segregate aberrant X-inactivation phenotypes and we mapped the mutation in one pedigree to chromosome 15. We now have mapped two additional mutations to the distal chromosome 5 and the proximal chromosome 10 in a second pedigree and show that each of the mutations is sufficient to induce the mutant phenotype. We further show that the roles of these factors are specific to embryonic X inactivation as neither genomic imprinting of multiple genes nor imprinted X inactivation is perturbed. Finally, we used mice bearing selected X-linked alleles that regulate X chromosome choice to demonstrate that the phenotypes of all three mutations are consistent with models in which the mutations have affected molecules involved specifically in the choice or the initiation of X inactivation.

Xite, X-inactivation intergenic transcription elements that regulate the probability of choice

Allelic expression differences contribute to phenotypic variation. In X chromosome inactivation (XCI), unfavorable XCI ratios promote X-linked disease penetrance in females. During XCI, one X is randomly silenced by Xist. X chromosome choice is determined by asymmetric expression of Tsix whose antisense action represses Xist. Here, we discover a cis element in the mouse X-inactivation center that regulates Tsix. Xite harbors intergenic transcription start sites and DNaseI hypersensitive sites with allelic differences. At the onset of XCI, deleting Xite downregulates Tsix in cis and skews XCI ratios, suggesting that Xite promotes Tsix persistence on the active X. Truncating Xite RNA is inconsequential, indicating that Xite action does not require intact transcripts. We propose that allele-specific Xite action promotes Tsix asymmetry and generates X chromosome inequality. Therefore, Xite is a candidate for the Xce, the classical modifier of XCI ratios.

Homozygous Tsix mutant mice reveal a sex-ratio distortion and revert to random X-inactivation

Tsix controls X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) by blocking the accumulation of Xist RNA on the future active X chromosome. Deleting Tsix on one X chromosome (X(Delta)X) skews XCI toward the mutated X chromosome in the female soma. Here I have generated homozygous Tsix-null mice (X(Delta)X(Delta)) to test how deleting the second allele affects the choice of XCI. Homozygosity leads to extremely low fertility and reveals two previously unknown non-mendelian patterns of inheritance. First, the sex ratio is skewed against female births so that one daughter is born for every two to three sons. Second, the pattern of XCI unexpectedly returns to random in surviving X(Delta)X(Delta) mice. Thus, with respect to choice, mutation of Tsix yields a phenotypic abnormality in heterozygotes but not homozygotes. To reconcile the paradox of female loss with apparent reversion to random choice, I propose that deleting both Tsix alleles results in chaotic choice and that randomness in X(Delta)X(Delta) survivors reflects a fortuitous selection of distinct X chromosomes as active and inactive.