Molecular drivers of resistance to sulbactam-durlobactam in contemporary clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii

Effects of different mechanisms on antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a strategic system for evaluating antibiotics against gram-negative bacteria

Our previous studies constructed a strategic system for testing antibiotics against specific resistance mechanisms using Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii. However, it lacked resistance mechanisms specifically expressed only in Pseudomonas species. In this study, we constructed this system using Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In-frame deletion, site-directed mutagenesis, and plasmid transformation were used to generate genetically engineered strains with various resistance mechanisms from two fully susceptible P. aeruginosa strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was used to test the efficacy of antibiotics against these strains in vitro. A total of 31 engineered strains with various antimicrobial resistance mechanisms from P. aeruginosa KPA888 and ATCC 27853 were constructed, and the same antibiotic resistance mechanism showed a similar effect on the MICs of the two strains. Compared to the parental strains, the engineered strains lacking porin OprD or lacking the regulator genes of efflux pumps all showed a ≥4-fold increase on the MICs of some of the 19 antibiotics tested. Mechanisms due to GyrA/ParC mutations and β-lactamases also contributed to their corresponding resistance as previously published. The strains constructed in this study possess well-defined resistance mechanisms and can be used to screen and evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotics against specific resistance mechanisms in P. aeruginosa. Building upon our previous studies on K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii, this strategic system, including a P. aeruginosa panel, has been expanded to cover almost all the important antibiotic resistance mechanisms of gram-negative bacteria that are in urgent need of new antibiotics.IMPORTANCEIn this study, an antibiotic assessment system for P. aeruginosa was developed, and the system can be expanded to include other key pathogens and resistance mechanisms. This system offers several benefits: (i) compound design: aid in the development of compounds that can bypass or counteract resistance mechanisms, leading to more effective treatments against specific resistant strains; (ii) combination therapies: facilitate the exploration of combination therapies, where multiple antibiotics may work synergistically to overcome resistance and enhance treatment efficacy; and (iii) targeted treatments: enable healthcare providers to prescribe more targeted treatments, reducing unnecessary antibiotic use and helping to slow the spread of antibiotic resistance. In summary, this system could streamline the development process, reduce costs, increase the success rate of new antibiotics, and help prevent and control antimicrobial resistance.

Addressing urgent priorities in antibiotic development: insights from WHO 2023 antibacterial clinical pipeline analyses

Antimicrobial resistance continues to evolve and remains a leading cause of death worldwide, with children younger than 5 years being among those at the highest risk. Addressing antimicrobial resistance requires a comprehensive response, including infection prevention efforts, surveillance, stewardship, therapy appropriateness and access, and research and development. However, antimicrobial research and development is limited and lags behind the output of other fields, such as that of cancer or HIV research. The 2023 WHO analysis of the global antibacterial clinical pipeline serves as a tool to monitor and guide research and development efforts. The analysis emphasises the remaining gaps in developing a robust and effective antibacterial drug pipeline, drawing insights from trend analyses and assessment of the innovation potential of candidate antimicrobials. In the present analysis, we evaluated the activity of antibiotics against the new WHO bacterial priority pathogens list 2024, which reflects changing trends in resistance patterns, distribution of bacterial infections, and the emergence of new resistance mechanisms.

Targeting Acinetobacter baumannii resistance-nodulation-division efflux pump transcriptional regulators to combat antimicrobial resistance

Regulatory elements controlling gene expression fine-tune bacterial responses to environmental cues, including antimicrobials, to optimize survival. Acinetobacter baumannii, a pathogen notorious for antimicrobial resistance, relies on efficient efflux systems. Though the role of efflux systems in antibiotic expulsion are well recognized, the regulatory mechanisms controlling their expression remain understudied. This review explores the current understanding of these regulators, aiming to inspire strategies to combat bacterial resistance and improve therapeutic outcomes.

Antibacterial Therapy Options for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

The review presents current treatment regimens for infections associated with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, which are leading nosocomial pathogens exhibiting multidrug resistance to available antibacterial drugs. To date, widely used beta-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems, have lost their effectiveness in combating acinetobacter infections, while new antibiotics remain poorly available to patients. Therefore, the only measure to combat the antibiotic resistance of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii is to evaluate the efficiency of combination therapy in vitro and in vivo, which is of particular interest to Russian and foreign researchers.

Successful Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Meningitis With Sulbactam-Durlobactam

BACKGROUND

The treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii/calcoaceticus complex (CRAB) presents significant treatment challenges.

METHODS

We report the case of a 42-year-old woman with CRAB meningitis who experienced persistently positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures for 13 days despite treatment with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam and cefiderocol. On day 13, she was transitioned to sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem; 4 subsequent CSF cultures remained negative. After 14 days of sulbactam-durlobactam, she was cured of infection. Whole genome sequencing investigations identified putative mechanisms that contributed to the reduced cefiderocol susceptibility observed during cefiderocol therapy. Blood and CSF samples were collected pre-dose and 3-hours post initiation of a sulbactam-durlobactam infusion.

RESULTS

The CRAB isolate belonged to sequence type 2. An acquired blaOXA-23 and an intrinsic blaOXA-51-like (ie, blaOXA-66) carbapenemase gene were identified. The paradoxical effect (ie, no growth at lower cefiderocol dilutions but growth at higher dilutions) was observed by broth microdilution after 8 days of cefiderocol exposure but not by disk diffusion. Potential markers of resistance to cefiderocol included mutations in the start codon of piuA and piuC iron transport genes and an A515V substitution in PBP3, the primary target of cefiderocol. Sulbactam and durlobactam were detected in CSF at both timepoints, indicating CSF penetration.

CONCLUSIONS

This case describes successful treatment of refractory CRAB meningitis with the administration of sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem and highlights the need to be cognizant of the paradoxical effect that can be observed with broth microdilution testing of CRAB isolates with cefiderocol.

Structural and functional diversity of Resistance-Nodulation-Division (RND) efflux pump transporters with implications for antimicrobial resistance

SUMMARYThe discovery of bacterial efflux pumps significantly advanced our understanding of how bacteria can resist cytotoxic compounds that they encounter. Within the structurally and functionally distinct families of efflux pumps, those of the Resistance-Nodulation-Division (RND) superfamily are noteworthy for their ability to reduce the intracellular concentration of structurally diverse antimicrobials. RND systems are possessed by many Gram-negative bacteria, including those causing serious human disease, and frequently contribute to resistance to multiple antibiotics. Herein, we review the current literature on the structure-function relationships of representative transporter proteins of tripartite RND efflux pumps of clinically important pathogens. We emphasize their contribution to bacterial resistance to clinically used antibiotics, host defense antimicrobials and other biocides, as well as highlighting structural similarities and differences among efflux transporters that help bacteria survive in the face of antimicrobials. Furthermore, we discuss technical advances that have facilitated and advanced efflux pump research and suggest future areas of investigation that will advance antimicrobial development efforts.

Optimizing Treatment for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Infections: A Review of Current Evidence

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex (CRAB) poses a significant global health challenge owing to its resistance to multiple antibiotics and limited treatment options. Polymyxin-based therapies have been widely used to treat CRAB infections; however, they are associated with high mortality rates and common adverse events such as nephrotoxicity. Recent developments include numerous observational studies and randomized clinical trials investigating antibiotic combinations, repurposing existing antibiotics, and the development of novel agents. Consequently, recommendations for treating CRAB are undergoing significant changes. The importance of colistin is decreasing, and the role of sulbactam, which exhibits direct antibacterial activity against A. baumannii complex, is being reassessed. High-dose ampicillin-sulbactam-based combination therapies, as well as combinations of sulbactam and durlobactam, which prevent the hydrolysis of sulbactam and binds to penicillin-binding protein 2, have shown promising results. This review introduces recent advancements in CRAB infection treatment based on clinical trial data, highlighting the need for optimized treatment protocols and comprehensive clinical trials to combat the evolving threat of CRAB effectively.

Characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex isolates and microbiological outcome for patients treated with sulbactam-durlobactam in a phase 3 trial (ATTACK)

Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) causes severe, difficult-to-treat infections that are frequently antibiotic resistant. Sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is a targeted β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic designed to treat ABC infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant strains. In a global, pathogen-specific, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial (ATTACK), the efficacy and safety of SUL-DUR were compared to colistin, both dosed with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC. Results from ATTACK showed that SUL-DUR met the criteria for non-inferiority to colistin for the primary efficacy endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality with improved clinical and microbiological outcomes compared to colistin. This report describes the characterization of the baseline ABC isolates from patients enrolled in ATTACK, including an analysis of the correlation of microbiological outcomes with SUL-DUR MIC values and the molecular drivers of SUL-DUR resistance.

Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Monomicrobial vs Polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Infections Treated With Sulbactam-Durlobactam or Colistin: A Subset Analysis From a Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Background

In a previous study, the efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam vs colistin for the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (CRABC) infections were evaluated in a randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Both arms were dosed on a background of imipenem-cilastatin to treat coinfecting gram-negative pathogens. Thirty-six percent of infections in the primary efficacy population were polymicrobial.

Methods

A subset analysis was performed to compare clinical and microbiological outcomes at test of cure (7 ± 2 days after the last dose) for patients with monomicrobial and polymicrobial CRABC infections. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics against baseline isolates were determined by broth microdilution according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methodology.

Results

Clinical cure, 28-day all-cause mortality, and microbiological outcomes were similar for patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam treatment arm with monomicrobial or polymicrobial A baumannii-calcoaceticus infections. Patients in the colistin arm with monomicrobial CRABC infections had higher mortality rates with worse clinical and microbiological outcomes as compared with those with polymicrobial infections. For patients who received sulbactam-durlobactam, imipenem susceptibility of coinfecting gram-negative pathogens trended with clinical benefit for patients with polymicrobial A baumannii-calcoaceticus infections. When tested in vitro, durlobactam restored imipenem susceptibility to the majority of coinfecting gram-negative pathogens from the sulbactam-durlobactam arm. This phenotype appeared to be related to the clinical outcome in 13 of 15 evaluable cases.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the use of sulbactam-durlobactam plus a carbapenem could be an effective approach to treat polymicrobial infections that include CRABC, but additional clinical data are needed to demonstrate efficacy.

Sulbactam-durlobactam: a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination targeting Acinetobacter baumannii

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a pathogen-targeted β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) in patients 18 years of age and older. Sulbactam is a penicillin derivative with antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter but is prone to hydrolysis by β-lactamases encoded by contemporary isolates. Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler classes A, C and D serine β-lactamases that restores sulbactam activity both in vitro and in vivo against multidrug-resistant ABC. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a promising alternative therapy for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections, which can have high rates of mortality.

n vitro pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of the β-lactamase inhibitor, durlobactam, in combination with sulbactam against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex

Infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii are increasingly multidrug resistant and associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Sulbactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor with intrinsic antibacterial activity against A. baumannii. Durlobactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor with an extended spectrum of activity compared to other inhibitors of its class. In vitro pharmacodynamic infection models were undertaken to establish the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index and magnitudes associated with sulbactam and durlobactam efficacy and to simulate epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposures at clinical doses to understand sulbactam-durlobactam activity with and without co-administration of a carbapenem. Hollow fiber infection models (HFIMs) and one-compartment systems were used to identify the PK/PD indices and exposure magnitudes associated of 1-log10 and 2-log10 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL reductions. Sulbactam and durlobactam demonstrated PK/PD drivers of % time above the minimum inhibition concentration (%T > MIC) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24)/MIC, respectively. Against a sulbactam-susceptible strain, sulbactam %T > MIC of 71.5 and 82.0 were associated with 1-log10 and 2-log10 CFU/mL reductions, respectively, in the HFIM. Against a non-susceptible strain, durlobactam restored the activity of sulbactam with an AUC0-24/MICs of 34.0 and 46.8 using a polysulfone cartridge to achieve a 1-log10 and 2-log10 CFU/mL reduction. These magnitudes were reduced to 13.8 and 24.2, respectively, using a polyvinylidene fluoride cartridge with a membrane pore size of 0.1 μm. In the one-compartment model, durlobactam AUC0-24/MIC to achieve 1-log10 and 2-log10 CFU/mL reduction were 7.6 and 33.4, respectively. Simulations of clinical ELF exposures in the HFIM showed cidal activity at MICs ≤4 µg/mL. Penicillin binding protein 3 mutant strains with MICs of 8 μg/mL may benefit from the addition of a carbapenem at clinical exposures.

Drug Discovery in the Field of β-Lactams: An Academic Perspective

β-Lactams are the most widely prescribed class of antibiotics that inhibit penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), particularly transpeptidases that function in peptidoglycan synthesis. A major mechanism of antibiotic resistance is the production of β-lactamase enzymes, which are capable of hydrolyzing β-lactam antibiotics. There have been many efforts to counter increasing bacterial resistance against β-lactams. These studies have mainly focused on three areas: discovering novel inhibitors against β-lactamases, developing new β-lactams less susceptible to existing resistance mechanisms, and identifying non-β-lactam inhibitors against cell wall transpeptidases. Drug discovery in the β-lactam field has afforded a range of research opportunities for academia. In this review, we summarize the recent new findings on both β-lactamases and cell wall transpeptidases because these two groups of enzymes are evolutionarily and functionally connected. Many efforts to develop new β-lactams have aimed to inhibit both transpeptidases and β-lactamases, while several promising novel β-lactamase inhibitors have shown the potential to be further developed into transpeptidase inhibitors. In addition, the drug discovery progress against each group of enzymes is presented in three aspects: understanding the targets, screening methodology, and new inhibitor chemotypes. This is to offer insights into not only the advancement in this field but also the challenges, opportunities, and resources for future research. In particular, cyclic boronate compounds are now capable of inhibiting all classes of β-lactamases, while the diazabicyclooctane (DBO) series of small molecules has led to not only new β-lactamase inhibitors but potentially a new class of antibiotics by directly targeting PBPs. With the cautiously optimistic successes of a number of new β-lactamase inhibitor chemotypes and many questions remaining to be answered about the structure and function of cell wall transpeptidases, non-β-lactam transpeptidase inhibitors may usher in the next exciting phase of drug discovery in this field.