In Vivo Effectiveness of Several Antimicrobial Locks To Eradicate Intravascular Catheter Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Biofilms

Risk of infections related to endovascular catheters and cardiac implantable devices in hemodialysis patients

Patients requiring dialysis are extremely vulnerable to infectious diseases. The high burden of comorbidities and weakened immune system due to uremia and previous immunosuppressive therapy expose the patient on dialysis to more infectious events than the general population. The infectious risk is further increased by the presence of endovascular catheters and implantable cardiologic devices. The former is generally placed as urgent vascular access for dialysis and in subjects requiring hemodialysis treatments without autogenous arteriovenous fistula. The high frequency of cardiovascular events also increases the likelihood of implanting indwelling implantable cardiac devices (CIED) such as pacemakers (PMs) and defibrillators (ICDs). The simultaneous presence of CVC and CIED yields an increased risk of developing severe prosthetic device-associated bloodstream infections often progressing to septicemia. Although, antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of prosthetic device-related infections, antibiotic resistance of biofilm-residing bacteria reduces the choice of infection eradication. In these cases, the resolution of the infection process relies on the removal of the prosthetic device. Compared to CVC removal, the extraction of leads is a more complex procedure and poses an increased risk of vessel tearing. As a result, the prevention of prosthetic device-related infection is of utmost importance in hemodialysis (HD) patients and relies principally on avoiding CVC as vascular access for HD and placement of a new class of wireless implantable medical devices. When the combination of CVC and CIED is inevitable, prevention of infection, mainly due translocation of skin bacteria, should be a mandatory priority for healthcare workers.

Strategies to Prevent Hemodialysis Catheter Dysfunction

Millions of patients with kidney failure rely on hemodialysis central venous catheters (CVCs) for their life-sustaining dialysis treatments. CVC dysfunction necessitates removal of up to 20% of CVCs and is an important problem for patients with kidney failure. Thrombosis and fibrin sheath formation are the most common mechanisms of CVC dysfunction beyond the first week after insertion. Factors such as female sex, left-sided CVC placement, and prior CVC dysfunction are associated with a higher risk of dysfunction. Patient-specific factors contribute substantially to variation in the number of CVC dysfunction events. Weekly thrombolytic locks have been shown to improve CVC blood flow rates, prevent infection, and reduce dysfunction requiring removal. However, routine administration may not be cost-effective in hemodialysis units with low infection rates, and targeted use among patients with established CVC dysfunction has not been studied. Concentrated heparin lock ( e.g ., 5000 versus 1000 international unit/ml) has been associated with lower requirements for therapeutic CVC thrombolysis but greater systemic bleeding risks and costs. Citrate 4% was noninferior to standard heparin locks to prevent thrombosis, may cause less bleeding, and is less costly in some countries. Tunneled CVCs with a symmetrical tip have been associated with a lower risk of CVC dysfunction compared with those with a step tip. Multifaceted CVC care interventions can reduce the incidence of dysfunctional CVCs by 33% compared with usual care. Future research to identify patients at high risk of CVC dysfunction will inform individualized vascular access plans, targeted use of preventive strategies, and enrollment criteria for future clinical trials.

Biofilm Resilience: Molecular Mechanisms Driving Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Contexts

Healthcare-associated infections pose a significant global health challenge, negatively impacting patient outcomes and burdening healthcare systems. A major contributing factor to healthcare-associated infections is the formation of biofilms, structured microbial communities encased in a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance matrix. Biofilms are critical in disease etiology and antibiotic resistance, complicating treatment and infection control efforts. Their inherent resistance mechanisms enable them to withstand antibiotic therapies, leading to recurrent infections and increased morbidity. This review explores the development of biofilms and their dual roles in health and disease. It highlights the structural and protective functions of the EPS matrix, which shields microbial populations from immune responses and antimicrobial agents. Key molecular mechanisms of biofilm resistance, including restricted antibiotic penetration, persister cell dormancy, and genetic adaptations, are identified as significant barriers to effective management. Biofilms are implicated in various clinical contexts, including chronic wounds, medical device-associated infections, oral health complications, and surgical site infections. Their prevalence in hospital environments exacerbates infection control challenges and underscores the urgent need for innovative preventive and therapeutic strategies. This review evaluates cutting-edge approaches such as DNase-mediated biofilm disruption, RNAIII-inhibiting peptides, DNABII proteins, bacteriophage therapies, antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticle-based solutions, antimicrobial coatings, and antimicrobial lock therapies. It also examines critical challenges associated with biofilm-related healthcare-associated infections, including diagnostic difficulties, disinfectant resistance, and economic implications. This review emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach and underscores the importance of understanding biofilm dynamics, their role in disease pathogenesis, and the advancements in therapeutic strategies to combat biofilm-associated infections effectively in clinical settings. These insights aim to enhance treatment outcomes and reduce the burden of biofilm-related diseases.

Differences in Efficacy between Antibacterial Lock Therapy and the Standard of Care for CVC-Related Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Central Venous Catheter (CVC)-related infections cannot always be solved by replacement, due to some vascular anomalies or an emergency status. This comprehensive, evidence-based review aimed to define the efficacy of antibacterial lock therapy (ALT) compared to the standard of care (SoC) in CVC-related infections. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, looking for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort or case-control observational studies. The eligible studies considered the subjects with a diagnosis of CVC-related infections treated with antibacterial lock therapy (ALT) compared to the standard of care (SoC). Results: Among 609 records at the end of the selection process, five articles, referring to observational studies, were included in this systematic review. In pooled analyses, including a total of 276 individuals, microbiological healing (OR 3.78; 95% CI; 2.03-7.03) showed significant differences between ALT and the SoC, with a follow-up varying from 2 weeks to 3 months. Conclusions: Our results suggested that ALT could improve the preservation of CVCs and could be considered when their replacement is not possible as a result of vascular problems. However, only observational studies were included and RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and to increase the level of evidence.

Oral minocycline as systemic therapy for uncomplicated venous access device-related bloodstream infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Venous access device-related bloodstream infection (VAD-BSI) with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Standard systemic antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated VAD-BSI with methicillin-resistant CoNS consists of intravenous (IV) vancomycin (vanco). This requires hospitalization, needs new competent venous access, exposes patients to potential toxicity (mainly renal) and increases the risk of commensal flora dysbiosis with selection of vanco-resistant enterococci. Combined with VAD management (removal or antibiotic locks), oral minocycline (mino) has been evaluated as an alternative systemic therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS at our center, primarily when the reference treatment with IV vanco was not possible (renal failure or allergy) or when hospitalization was refused by patients. Here, we retrospectively report our single center experience with this mino-based approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2020, 24 uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS in 23 alloHCT patients were treated with oral mino as systemic antibiotic therapy in combination with VAD management. VAD were implantable ports (n = 17), tunneled catheter (n = 1) or PIC-lines (n = 6). Staphylococci were S. epidermidis (n = 21) or S. haemolyticus (n = 3). Mino was administered with a loading dose of 200 mg followed by 100 mg BID for 7-14 days. For 8 VAD-BSIs, patients were initially treated with IV vanco for the first 1-3 days followed by oral mino, while 16 VAD-BSIs were treated with oral mino as the sole antimicrobial agent for systemic therapy. VAD management consisted of catheter removal (for tunneled catheters and PIC-lines, n = 7) or antibiotic locks with vanco (n = 15) or gentamicin (n = 2) administered at least 3 times a week for 14 days (for ports).

RESULTS

Overall, clearance of bacteremia (as assessed by negativity for the same CoNS of surveillance peripheral blood cultures drawn between day+ 3 and +30 after initiation of systemic therapy) was achieved in all but 1 patient (with port) who had persistent bacteremia at day +9. No complication such as suppurative thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, distant foci of infection or BSI-related death was observed in any patient during the 3-month period after initiation of treatment. Regarding the 17 port-BSI cases for which VAD conservative strategy was attempted, failure of 3-month VAD preservation was documented in 7/17 cases and 3-month recurrence of VAD-BSI was observed in 3/17 cases (with 1 patient with cellulitis). Treatment with mino was well tolerated except for a mild skin rash in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of this approach.

Daptomycin as an option for lock therapy: a systematic literature review

Aim: To review preclinical and clinical data relevant to daptomycin lock therapy in catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). Methods: Systematic review in PubMed, Scopus and clinical trial registries. Results: Preclinical data demonstrate daptomycin lock solution stability and compatibility with heparin, good biofilm penetration, bactericidal activity against biofilm-embedded bacteria, and high efficacy in vitro and in animal catheter infection models. Clinical data remain limited (two case reports and five case series totaling n = 65 CRBSI episodes), albeit promising (successful catheter salvage in about 80% of cases). Conclusion: Despite theoretical advantages of daptomycin, clinical data remain scarce. Comparative studies versus alternative lock solutions are needed, as well as studies to define optimal daptomycin lock regimen (including optimal concentration, dwell time and lock duration).

Usefulness of daptomycin lock therapy in children with catheter-related bacteremia after failed vancomycin lock therapy

PURPOSE

Catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) is a significant cause of morbidity, resource expenditure and prolonged hospital stays in patients with long-term catheters, whose numbers have increased considerably in recent years. Antibiotic lock therapy reaches high concentrations in the catheter, allowing good penetration into the biofilm, being vancomycin the most commonly used one in gram-positive infections. Several authors have recently reported the superior in vitro efficacy of daptomycin compared with vancomycin, especially for eradicating biofilms. Although there is some data on the use of daptomycin for antibiotic lock in animal models and adults, there are no data on its use in children.

METHODS

A descriptive study was conducted in a tertiary hospital, including patients younger than 16 years in whom daptomycin lock therapy was employed between 2018 and 2022.

RESULTS

We report three pediatric patients in whom CRB was confirmed on admission by paired blood cultures positive for CoNS sensitive to vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid. All patients started vancomycin lock therapy and systemic antibiotic therapy with proven sensitivity for the isolated bacteria, without achieving negative blood cultures. Due to the persistence of positive cultures, vancomycin lock therapy was replaced by daptomycin, and blood cultures turned negative, with no relapses or need for catheter removal.

CONCLUSION

The use of daptomycin lock therapy could be considered in children with CoNS catheter infection, especially when other antibiotic lock therapy had failed.