Impact of Integrase Sequences From HIV-1 Subtypes A6/A1 on the In Vitro Potency of Cabotegravir or Rilpivirine

Clair M, Polli JW, Vanveggel S, Vandermeulen K, D’Amico R, Garges HP, Zolopa A, Spreen WR, van Wyk J, Cutrell AG. Expanded Multivariable Models to Assist Patient Selection for Long-Acting Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine Treatment: Clinical Utility of a Combination of Patient, Drug Concentration, and Viral Factors Associated With Virologic Failure

BACKGROUND

Previously reported post hoc multivariable analyses exploring predictors of confirmed virologic failure (CVF) with cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB + RPV LA) were expanded to include data beyond week 48, additional covariates, and additional participants.

METHODS

Pooled data from 1651 participants were used to explore dosing regimen (every 4 or every 8 weeks), demographic, viral, and pharmacokinetic covariates as potential predictors of CVF. Prior dosing regimen experience was accounted for using 2 populations. Two models were conducted in each population-baseline factor analyses exploring factors known at baseline and multivariable analyses exploring baseline factors plus postbaseline model-predicted CAB/RPV trough concentrations (4 and 44 weeks postinjection). Retained factors were evaluated to understand their contribution to CVF (alone or in combination).

RESULTS

Overall, 1.4% (n = 23/1651) of participants had CVF through 152 weeks. The presence of RPV resistance-associated mutations, human immunodeficiency virus-1 subtype A6/A1, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 were associated with an increased risk of CVF (P < .05 adjusted incidence rate ratio), with participants with ≥2 of these baseline factors having a higher risk of CVF. Lower model-predicted CAB/RPV troughs were additional factors retained for multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ≥2 baseline factors (RPV resistance-associated mutations, A6/A1 subtype, and/or body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) was associated with increased CVF risk, consistent with prior analyses. Inclusion of initial model-predicted CAB/RPV trough concentrations (≤first quartile) did not improve the prediction of CVF beyond the presence of a combination of ≥2 baseline factors, reinforcing the clinical utility of the baseline factors in the appropriate use of CAB + RPV LA.

Effect of the L74I Polymorphism on Fitness of Cabotegravir-Resistant Variants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 Subtype A6

The presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 subtype A6, characterized by the L74I integrase (IN) polymorphism, is associated with confirmed virologic failure in clinical trials of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine. We investigated the effect of L74I on replication capacity (RC) of recombinant viruses carrying this polymorphism in combination with various IN stand-transfer inhibitor resistance mutations. The presence of L74I conferred greater RC to recombinant viruses expressing HIV-1 A6 IN when present together with G118R, G140R, Q148H, and R263K; no significant difference in RC was observed for the Q148K or R mutants. These findings may explain, in part, the association of HIV-1 subtype A6 with virologic failure.

Dolutegravir-associated resistance mutations after first-line treatment failure in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Since January 2017, the recommended first-line antiretroviral regimen in Brazil is the fixed-dose combination of tenofovir plus lamivudine with dolutegravir (TL + D). According to the literature, integrase resistance-associated mutations (INRAMs) are rarely found upon virologic failure to first-line dolutegravir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. We evaluated the HIV antiretroviral genotypic resistance profile of patients referred for genotyping in the public health system who failed first-line TL + D after at least six months of therapy on or before December 31, 2018.

METHODS

HIV Sanger sequences of the pol gene were generated from plasma of patients with confirmed virologic failure to first-line TL + D in the Brazilian public health system before December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen individuals were included in the analysis. Major INRAMs were detected in seven patients (6.19%), four with R263K, one with G118R, one with E138A, and one with G140R. Four patients with major INRAMs also had the K70E and M184V mutations in the RT gene. Sixteen (14.2%) additional individuals presented minor INRAMs, and five (4,42%) patients had both major and minor INRAMS. Thirteen (11.5%) patients also presented mutations in the RT gene selected by tenofovir and lamivudine, including four with both the K70E and M184V mutations and four with only M184V. The integrase mutations L101I and T124A, which are in the in vitro pathway for integrase inhibitor resistance, were found in 48 and 19 patients, respectively. Mutations not related to TL + D, thus probable transmitted resistance mutations (TDR), were present in 28 patients (24.8%): 25 (22.1%) to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 19 (16.8%) to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and 6 (5.31%) to protease inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In marked contrast to previous reports, we report a relatively high frequency of INRAMs among selected patients failing first-line TL + D in the public health system in Brazil. Possible reasons for this discrepancy include delays in detecting virologic failure, patients inadvertently on dolutegravir monotherapy, TDR, and/or infecting subtype.

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy: will it change the future of HIV treatment?

The treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has greatly advanced over the past few decades from complex regimens, with high toxicities, multiple daily dosing, and incomplete viral suppression to more simplified, highly effective, daily oral regimens. Although these advancements greatly improved access and tolerability, the need for daily antiretroviral (ARV) administration remained until recently. With long-acting (LA) injectable ARV options emerging, patients may choose how they want to receive treatment. By eliminating the barrier of daily medication adherence, LA injectable ARV formulations have the potential to not only improve health outcomes for the individual, but also the community by reducing HIV transmission. At the time of this writing cabotegravir/rilpivirine (LA-CAB/RPV) is the only LA injectable ARV regimen approved as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV in adults and adolescents (⩾35 kg and ⩾12 years of age) who are virologically suppressed. However, additional studies of LA-CAB/RPV in expanded populations, and of other LA ARVs, are underway. The goal of this article was to summarize clinical data and review pertinent clinical considerations for the use of LA-CAB/RPV in the management of HIV.

Genotypic correlates of resistance to the HIV-1 strand transfer integrase inhibitor cabotegravir

Cabotegravir (CAB) is an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) formulated as a long-acting injectable drug approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis and use with a long acting rilpivirine formulation for therapy in patients with virological suppression. However, there has been no comprehensive review of the genetic mechanisms of CAB resistance. Studies reporting the selection of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) by CAB and the results of in vitro CAB susceptibility testing were reviewed. The impact of integrase mutations on CAB susceptibility was assessed using regularized regression analysis. The most commonly selected mutations in the 24 persons developing virological failure while receiving CAB included Q148R (n = 15), N155H (n = 7), and E138K (n = 5). T97A, G118R, G140 A/R/S, and R263K each developed in 1-2 persons. With the exception of T97A, G118R, and G140 A/R, these DRMs were also selected in vitro while G140R was selected in the SIV macaque model. Although these DRMs are similar to those occurring in persons receiving the related INSTI dolutegravir, Q148R was more likely to occur with CAB while G118R and R263K were more likely to occur with dolutegravir. Regularized regression analysis identified 14 DRMs significantly associated with reduced CAB susceptibility including six primary DRMs which reduced susceptibility on their own including G118R, Q148 H/K/R, N155H, and R263K, and eight accessory DRMs including M50I, L74 F/M, T97A, E138K, and G140 A/C/S. Isolates with Q148 H/K/R in combination with L74M, E138 A/K, G140 A/S, and N155H often had >10-fold reduced CAB susceptibility. M50I, L74M, and T97A are polymorphic mutations that alone did not appear to increase the risk of virological failure in persons receiving a CAB-containing regimen. Careful patient screening is required to prevent CAB from being used during active virus replication. Close virological monitoring is required to minimize CAB exposure to active replication to prevent the emergence of DRMs associated with cross-resistance to other INSTIs.

Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention: What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Risks and Consequences of Cabotegravir Resistance?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cabotegravir is a potent integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) recently approved as a long-acting injectable formulation for HIV prevention (CAB-LA). We summarize what is known about cabotegravir pharmacokinetics, activity, and emergence of resistance from in vitro, macaque and clinical studies, and we evaluate the risk of resistance from CAB-LA with on-time injections and after CAB-LA discontinuation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The accumulation of multiple INSTI mutations is required for high-level cabotegravir resistance, and the same mutation combinations may cause cross-resistance to dolutegravir, which is widely used for first-line antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries. Though CAB-LA was highly effective in preventing HIV, breakthrough infections did occur in trials of CAB-LA despite on-time injections, resulting in selection of single and combinations of INSTI resistance mutations. As CAB-LA is scaled-up, prompt HIV diagnosis to prevent resistance, and resistance monitoring could help preserve the effectiveness of INSTIs for both HIV treatment and prevention.

HIV-1 subtype F integrase polymorphisms external to the catalytic core domain contribute to severe loss of replication capacity in context of the integrase inhibitor resistance mutation Q148H

BACKGROUND

In prior studies, HIV-1 BF recombinants with subtype F integrases failed to develop resistance to raltegravir through the Q148H mutational pathway. We aimed to determine the role of subtype-specific polymorphisms in integrase on drug susceptibility, viral replication and integration.

METHODS

Integrase sequences were retrieved from the Los Alamos Database or obtained from the Garrahan HIV cohort. HIV-1 infectious molecular clones with or without Q148H (+ G140S) resistance mutations were constructed using integrases of subtype B (NL4-3) or F1(BF) ARMA159 and URTR23. Integrase chimeras were generated by reciprocal exchanges of a 200 bp fragment spanning amino acids 85-150 of the catalytic core domain (CCD) of NL4-3-Q148H and either ARMA159-Q148H or URTR23-Q148H. Viral infections were quantified by p24 ELISA and Alu-gag integration PCR assay.

RESULTS

At least 18 different polymorphisms distinguish subtype B from F1(BF) recombinant integrases. In phenotypic experiments, p24 at Day 15 post-infection was high (105-106 pg/mL) for WT and NL4-3-Q148H; by contrast, it was low (102-104 pg/mL) for both F1(BF)-Q148H + G140S viruses, and undetectable for the Q148H mutants. Compared with WT viruses, integrated DNA was reduced by 5-fold for NL4-3-Q148H (P = 0.05), 9-fold for URTR23-Q148H (P = 0.01) and 16000-fold for ARMA159-Q148H (P = 0.01). Reciprocal exchange between B and F1(BF) of an integrase CCD region failed to rescue the replicative defect of F1(BF) integrase mutants.

CONCLUSIONS

The functional impairment of Q148H in the context of subtype F integrases from BF recombinants explains the lack of selection of this pathway in vivo. Non-B polymorphisms external to the integrase CCD may influence the pathway to integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance.

The future of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine therapy: Deeds and misconceptions

HIV infection is currently managed as a chronic disease thanks to the improvement of antiretroviral therapy (ART). In this light, treatment is lifelong. Therefore, switch to new regimens is a natural event during long-term therapies to avoid problems related to toxicity, adherence, failure and potential selection of drug resistance. In this context, coformulations of multiple agents in one pill and the development of novel drug classes and drugs with high genetic barrier to resistance are now available. The recent approval of the long-acting once monthly or bimonthly injectable combination of the second-generation strand transfer integrase inhibitor (InSTI) cabotegravir (CAB) together with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) rilpivirine (RPV) represents the most recent achievement along the line of potent and convenient ART. Several pivotal trials (such as LATTE-2, ATLAS, FLAIR, and ATLAS-2M) largely demonstrated the high efficacy and safety of this long-acting formulation used as an induction-maintenance strategy. Few confirmed virological failures (CVF) have been observed. The combination of at least two baseline factors among HIV-1 subtype A6/A1, a body mass index ≥30 kg/m², and RPV resistance associated mutations, was associated with an increased risk of CVF at week 48. Available data indicate that this long-acting therapeutic strategy is attractive and potent, thus defining the most appropriate patient and how to handle practical issues is warranted.