Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile Isolates of Varying Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes to SMT19969 and 11 Comparators

European Practice for CDI Treatment

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Historically, two antibiotics (metronidazole and vancomycin) and a recent third (fidaxomicin) have been used for CDI treatment; convincing data are now available showing that metronidazole is the least efficacious agent. The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) management guidance for CDI were updated in 2021. This guidance document outlines the treatment options for a variety of CDI clinical scenarios and for non-antimicrobial management (e.g., faecal microbiota transplantation, FMT). One of the main changes is that metronidazole is no longer recommended as first-line CDI treatment. Rather, fidaxomicin is preferred on the basis of reduced recurrence rates with vancomycin as an acceptable alternative. Recommended options for recurrent CDI now include bezlotoxumab as well as FMT.A 2017 survey of 20 European countries highlighted variation internationally in CDI management strategies. A variety of restrictions were in place in 65% countries prior to use of new anti-CDI treatments, including committee/infection specialist approval or economic review/restrictions. This survey was repeated in November 2022 to assess the current landscape of CDI management practices in Europe. Of 64 respondents from 17 countries, national CDI guidelines existed in 14 countries, and 11 have already/plan to incorporate the ESCMID 2021 CDI guidance, though implementation has not been surveyed in 6. Vancomycin is the most commonly used first-line agent for the treatment of CDI (n = 42, 66%), followed by fidaxomicin (n = 30, 47%). Six (9%) respondents use metronidazole as first-line agent for CDI treatment, whereas 22 (34%) only in selected low-risk patient groups. Fidaxomicin is more likely to be used in high-risk patient groups. Availability of anti-CDI therapy influenced prescribing in six respondents (9%). Approval pre-prescription was required before vancomycin (n = 3, 5%), fidaxomicin (n = 10, 6%), bezlotoxumab (n = 11, 17%) and FMT (n = 10, 6%). Implementation of CDI guidelines is rarely audited.Novel anti-CDI agents are being evaluated; it is not yet clear what will be the roles of these agents. The treatment of recurrent CDI is particularly troublesome, and several different live biotherapeutics are being developed, in addition to FMT.

Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile

The rapid evolution of antibiotic resistance in Clostridioides difficile and the consequent effects on prevention and treatment of C. difficile infections (CDIs) are a matter of concern for public health. Antibiotic resistance plays an important role in driving C. difficile epidemiology. Emergence of new types is often associated with the emergence of new resistances, and most of the epidemic C. difficile clinical isolates is currently resistant to multiple antibiotics. In particular, it is to worth to note the recent identification of strains with reduced susceptibility to the first-line antibiotics for CDI treatment and/or for relapsing infections. Antibiotic resistance in C. difficile has a multifactorial nature. Acquisition of genetic elements and alterations of the antibiotic target sites, as well as other factors, such as variations in the metabolic pathways or biofilm production, contribute to the survival of this pathogen in the presence of antibiotics. Different transfer mechanisms facilitate the spread of mobile elements among C. difficile strains and between C. difficile and other species. Furthermore, data indicate that both genetic elements and alterations in the antibiotic targets can be maintained in C. difficile regardless of the burden imposed on fitness, and therefore resistances may persist in C. difficile population in absence of antibiotic selective pressure.

Clostridioides difficile MreE (PBP2) variants facilitate clinical disease during cephalosporin exposures

Cephalosporins are the most common triggers of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). Here, we confirm gene-level drivers of cephalosporin resistance and their roles in promoting disease. Genomic-epidemiologic analyses of 306 C. difficile isolates from a hospital surveillance program monitoring asymptomatic carriers and CDI patients identified prevalent third-generation cephalosporin resistance to ceftriaxone at >256 ug/mL in 26% of isolates. Resistance was associated with patient cephalosporin exposures 8-10 days before C. difficile detection. Genomic analyses identified variants in the mreE penicillin binding protein 2 (PBP2) associated with resistance to multiple beta-lactam classes. Transfer of variants into susceptible strain CD630 elevated resistance to first and third-generation cephalosporins. Transfer into the mouse-infective strain ATCC 43255 enabled disease when mice were exposed to 500ug/mL cefoperazone, a dose that inhibited the isogenic susceptible strain. Our findings establish roles of cephalosporins and mreE-cephalosporin-resistant variants in CDI and provide testable genetic loci for detecting resistance in patient strains.

Ridinilazole: a novel, narrow-spectrum antimicrobial agent targeting Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile

Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile infection (CDI) remains an urgent threat to patients in health systems worldwide. Recurrent CDI occurs in up to 30% of cases due to sustained dysbiosis of the gut microbiota which normally protects against CDI. Associated costs of initial and recurrent episodes of CDI impose heavy financial burdens on health systems. Vancomycin and metronidazole have been the mainstay of therapy for CDI for many years; however, these agents continue to cause significant disruption to the gut microbiota and thus carry a high risk of recurrence for CDI patients. Treatment regimens are now turning towards novel narrow spectrum antimicrobial agents which target C. difficile while conserving the commensal gut microbiota, thus significantly reducing risk of recurrence. One such agent, fidaxomicin, has been in therapeutic use for several years and is now recommended as a first-line treatment for CDI, as it is superior to vancomycin in reducing risk of recurrence. Another narrow spectrum agent, ridnilazole, was recently developed and is undergoing evaluation of its potential clinical utility. This review aimed to summarize experimental reports of ridinilazole and assess its potential as a first-line agent for treatment of CDI. Reported results from in vitro assessments, and from hamster models of CDI, show potent activity against C. difficile, non-inferiority to vancomycin for clinical cure and non-susceptibility among most gut commensal bacteria. Phase I and II clinical trials have been completed with ridinilazole showing high tolerability and efficacy in treatment of CDI, and superiority over vancomycin in reducing recurrence of CDI within 30 days of treatment completion. Phase III trials are currently underway, the results of which may prove its potential to reduce recurrent CDI and lessen the heavy health and financial burden C. difficile imposes on patients and healthcare systems.

Phage delivered CRISPR-Cas system to combat multidrug-resistant pathogens in gut microbiome

The Host-microbiome interactions that exist inside the gut microbiota operate in a synergistic and abnormal manner. Additionally, the normal homeostasis and functioning of gut microbiota are frequently disrupted by the intervention of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) pathogens. CRISPR-Cas (CRISPR-associated protein with clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats) recognized as a prokaryotic immune system has emerged as an effective genome-editing tool to edit and delete specific microbial genes for the expulsion of bacteria through bactericidal action. In this review, we demonstrate many functioning CRISPR-Cas systems against the anti-microbial resistance of multiple pathogens, which infiltrate the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, we discuss the advancement in the development of a phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas system for killing a gut MDR pathogen. We also discuss a combinatorial approach to use bacteriophage as a delivery system for the CRISPR-Cas gene for targeting a pathogenic community in the gut microbiome to resensitize the drug sensitivity. Finally, we discuss engineered phage as a plausible potential option for the CRISPR-Cas system for pathogenic killing and improvement of the efficacy of the system.

Iron Effects on Clostridioides difficile Toxin Production and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities

Despite the benefits of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion therapy, it can render patients vulnerable to iron overload. The excess iron deposits in various body tissues cause severe complications and organ damage such as cardiotoxicity and mold infections. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea among cancer patients and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Our study aims to determine the role of iron overload and the effects of iron chelators on CDI. Our results demonstrated that iron (Fe3+) stimulated the growth of C. difficile with increased colony formation units (CFU) in a dose-dependent manner. Exposure to excess iron also increased the gene expression levels of tcdA and tcdB. The production of C. difficile toxin A, necessary for the pathogenesis of C. difficile, was also elevated after iron treatment. In the presence of excess iron, C. difficile becomes less susceptible to metronidazole with significantly elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) but remains susceptible to vancomycin. Iron-stimulated colony formation and production of C. difficile toxins were effectively diminished by iron chelator deferoxamine co-treatment. Incorporating iron overload status as a potential factor in developing a risk prediction model of CDI and antibiotic treatment response may aid clinical practitioners in optimizing CDI management in oncology patients.

Antimicrobial resistance progression in the United Kingdom: A temporal comparison of Clostridioides difficile antimicrobial susceptibilities

OBJECTIVES

Clostridioides difficile (CD) is widely reported as one of the most prevalent multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms. Assessment of temporally disparate isolate collections can give valuable epidemiological data to further the understanding of antimicrobial resistance progression.

METHODS

A collection of 75 CD isolates (1980-86) was characterised by PCR ribotyping, cell cytotoxicity assay and susceptibility testing with a panel of 16 antimicrobials and compared to a modern surveillance collection consisting of 416 UK isolates (2012-2016). Agar-incorporation was performed to ascertain susceptibility data for vancomycin, metronidazole, rifampicin, fidaxomicin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, imipenem, chloramphenicol, tigecycline, linezolid, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin. Genomes were obtained using Illumina HiSeq3000 sequencing and assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench. Resistance genes were identified using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Research Database's Resistance Gene Identifier and ResFinder3.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-six known and one previously unobserved ribotype (RT) were detected. RT015 and RT020 dominated; 21.3% and 17.3%, respectively. Three moxifloxacin resistant (16-32 mg/L) RT027 isolates were recovered, pre-dating the earliest reports of this phenotype/genotype. Phenotypic resistance was observed to moxifloxacin (9.3% of isolates), ciprofloxacin (100%), erythromycin (17.3%), tetracycline (9.3%), linezolid and chloramphenicol (4.0%). Phenotypic comparisons with modern strains revealed increasing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), with MIC₅₀ elevations of one doubling-dilution for the majority of compounds, excluding clindamycin and imipenem. Moxifloxacin MIC₉₀ comparisons revealed a two doubling-dilution increase between temporal isolate collections. Historical genomes revealed twenty different resistance determinants, including ermB (8.0% of isolates), tetM (9.3%), cfr (5.3%) and gyrA substitution Thr-82→Ile (9.3%). Seventeen isolates (22.7%) were resistant to ≥3 compounds (MDR), demonstrating ten different combinations. Intra-RT diversity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic resistance in CD has increased since the early 1980s, across the majority of classes. Moxifloxacin resistance determinants may pre-date its introduction.

Protecting the Microbiota

We examine 3 different approaches to protecting the gut microbiome: highly targeted antibiotics, antibiotic destruction, and antibiotic binding. Each approach shows promise to prevent the off-target effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiome.

Growing consumption of antibiotics and epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infections in Poland: A need to develop new solutions

Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infections (CDIs) are becoming more common and more serious. C. difficile is the etiologic agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, pseudomembranous enterocolitis, and toxic megacolon while CDIs recur in 7.9% of patients. About 42.9 CDI cases/10,000 patient-days are diagnosed each day in Europe, whereas in Poland 5.6 CDI cases/10,000 patient-days are reported; however, the median for European countries is 2.9 CDI cases/10,000 patient-days. Epidemiology of CDIs has changed in recent years and risk of developing the disease has doubled in the past decade that is largely determined by use of antibiotics. Studies show that rate of antibiotic consumption in the non-hospital sector in Poland is much higher than the European average (27 vs. 21.8 DDD/1,000 patient-days), and this value has increased in recent years. Antibiotic consumption has also increased in the hospital sector, especially in the intensive care units - 1,520 DDD/1,000 patient-days (ranging from 620 to 3,960 DDD/1,000 patient-days) - and was significantly higher than in Germany 1,305 (ranging from 463 to 2,216 DDD/1,000 patient-days) or in Sweden 1,147 (ranging from 605 to 2,134 DDD/1,000 patient-days). The recent rise in CDI incidence has prompted a search for alternative treatments. Great hope is placed in probiotics, bacteriocins, monoclonal antibodies, bacteriophages, and developing new vaccines.

cfr(B), cfr(C), and a New cfr-Like Gene, cfr(E), in Clostridium difficile Strains Recovered across Latin America

Cfr is a radical S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) enzyme that confers cross-resistance to antibiotics targeting the 23S rRNA through hypermethylation of nucleotide A2503. Three cfr-like genes implicated in antibiotic resistance have been described, two of which, cfr(B) and cfr(C), have been sporadically detected in Clostridium difficile However, the methylase activity of Cfr(C) has not been confirmed. We found cfr(B), cfr(C), and a cfr-like gene that shows only 51 to 58% protein sequence identity to Cfr and Cfr-like enzymes in clinical C. difficile isolates recovered across nearly a decade in Mexico, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Chile. This new resistance gene was termed cfr(E). In agreement with the anticipated function of the cfr-like genes detected, all isolates exhibited high MIC values for several ribosome-targeting antibiotics. In addition, in vitro assays confirmed that Cfr(C) and Cfr(E) methylate Escherichia coli and, to a lesser extent, C. difficile 23S rRNA fragments at the expected positions. The analyzed isolates do not have mutations in 23S rRNA genes or genes encoding the ribosomal proteins L3 and L4 and lack poxtA, optrA, and pleuromutilin resistance genes. Moreover, these cfr-like genes were found in Tn6218-like transposons or integrative and conjugative elements (ICE) that could facilitate their transfer. These results indicate selection of potentially mobile cfr-like genes in C. difficile from Latin America and provide the first assessment of the methylation activity of Cfr(C) and Cfr(E), which belong to a cluster of Cfr-like proteins that does not include the functionally characterized enzymes Cfr, Cfr(B), and Cfr(D).

Ridinilazole for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection

INTRODUCTION

Ridinilazole is a novel antibiotic being developed for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Ridinilazole has completed two phase II trials and phase III trials which are denoted Ri-CoDIFy 1 and 2, are planned (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03595553 and NCT03595566). Areas covered: This article covers the chemistry, mechanism of action, in vitro microbiology versus C. difficile and host microbiota, pre-clinical and clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety and tolerability of ridinilazole. Expert opinion: Ridinilazole is a novel antibiotic with ideal properties for the treatment of CDI. Given the promising results from the phase II clinical trial, ridinilazole may have the capability to lower the risk for CDI recurrence thus improving sustained clinical response rates - a current unmet medical need. Assuming a positive phase III trial, ridinilazole will enter a market with heightened awareness on the importance of prevention of CDI. This along with further research into the economic consequences and decreased patient quality of life associated with recurrent CDI, should provide clinicians with further evidence for the need for therapy that limits CDI recurrence and improves sustained clinical cure.

Ridinilazole: a novel antimicrobial for Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection remains a global healthcare threat worldwide and the limited options available for its treatment are of particular concern. Ridinilazole is one potential future agent, as it demonstrates rapid bactericidal activity against C. difficile. Current studies show that ridinilazole has a lower propensity for collateral damage to the gut microbiome and appears to diminish the production of C. difficile toxins. Results from phase II studies demonstrate that patients receiving ridinilazole had a higher sustained clinical response compared with patients receiving vancomycin (66.7% vs. 42.4%; P=0.0004). Adverse reactions were similar between ridinilazole and vancomycin (40% vs. 56%, respectively), with most being gastrointestinal-related. Nausea (20%) and abdominal pain (12%) were the most commonly reported adverse reactions associated with ridinilazole. Phase II study results are promising and future availability of phase III trial results will help further delineate the role and value of ridinilazole.

Current developments in lantibiotic discovery for treating Clostridium difficile infection

INTRODUCTION

Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea linked to the misuse of antimicrobials and the corresponding deleterious impact they have on the protective microbiota of the gut. Resistance to agents used to treat C. difficile including metronizadole and vancomycin has been reported highlighting the need for novel agents. Lantibiotics represent a novel class of agents that many studies have highlighted as effective against C. difficile. Areas covered: In this review lantibiotics including nisin, actagardine, mersacidin, NAI-107 and MU-1140 that exhibit good activity against C.difficile, all of which are currently in the preclinical phase of investigation are discussed. The lantibiotic NVB302, which has completed phase I clinical trials for the treatment of C. difficile, is also described. Expert opinion: Lantibiotics represent promising candidates for the treatment of C. difficile infections due to their novel mode of action, which is thought to decrease the potential of resistance developing and the fact they often possess a less deleterious effect on the protective gut microbiota when compared to traditional agents. They are also extremely amenable to bioengineering approaches and the incorporation of synthetic biology to produce more potent variants.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and ribotypes of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of ridinilazole (SMT19969) and vancomycin

Objectives

We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility and ribotypes of Clostridium difficile isolates from participants in a Phase 2 study of ridinilazole, a novel targeted-spectrum agent for treatment of C. difficile infection.

Methods

Participants received ridinilazole (200 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg four times daily) for 10 days (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02092935). The MICs of ridinilazole and comparators for C. difficile isolates from stool samples were determined by agar dilution. Toxin gene profiling was performed by multiplex PCR and ribotype identification by capillary electrophoresis.

Results

Eighty-nine isolates were recovered from 88/100 participants (one participant had two strains at baseline). The median colony count (cfu/g stool) was 1.9 × 104 (range: 2.5 × 102-7.0 × 106). Twelve participants (three received ridinilazole and nine received vancomycin) experienced recurrence, confirmed by immunoassays for free toxin in stool samples. The ribotype of eight out of nine isolates obtained at recurrence matched those of the initial isolates. All isolates, including those obtained at recurrence, were susceptible to ridinilazole within the expected range [median (range) MIC: 0.12 (0.06-0.5) mg/L]. The median (range) vancomycin MIC was 1 (0.5-4.0) mg/L. At baseline, 13.6% and 13.3% of samples in the ridinilazole and vancomycin groups were positive for VRE, increasing to 23.7% and 29.7% by day 40, respectively. Common ribotypes included 014-20 (14 isolates), 027 (13), 106 (7), 002 (7), 078-126 (4), 001 (4), 087 (3) and 198 (3). Toxin gene profiling of nearly all baseline isolates (98.9%) revealed a binary toxin gene (cdtA/cdtB) prevalence of 35%.

Conclusions

Ridinilazole potently inhibited recovered C. difficile isolates. Recurrence was not associated with altered susceptibility.

New and emerging therapies in treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) represents one of the most serious nosocomial infections that have grown dramatically over the past decade. Vancomycin and metronidazole are currently used as a standard therapy for CDI. Metronidazole is recommended as a first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate infections and vancomycin is mainly used for severe and/or refractory cases. However, studies have demonstrated that there are quite high CDI relapse rates with both of these medications, which represents a challenge for clinicians. Over the last decade, a number of newer and novel therapeutic options have emerged as promising alternatives to these standard CDI therapies. The following review provides the updated summaries of these newer therapeutic agents and their status in the treatment of CDI.

Antibiotic susceptibility and resistance profiles of Romanian Clostridioides difficile isolates

This study investigated the antibiotic susceptibility patterns and genetic resistance markers of 35 C. difficile strains isolated from patients with C. difficile infection. Vancomycin, metronidazole, tigecycline, teicoplanin, rifampicin, moxifloxacin, cefotaxime, tetracycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, linezolid and imipenem MICs were determined for toxigenic strains belonging to PCR ribotypes (PR) 012 (2), 014 (4), 017 (3), 018 (2), 027 (17), 046 (2), 087 (3) and 115 (2). Results showed vancomycin, metronidazole, tigecycline and teicoplanin to be active against all isolates. High resistance rates were noticed against cefotaxime (n = 35), clindamycin (n = 33), imipenem (n = 31), moxifloxacin (n = 25), erythromycin (n = 25) and rifampicin (n = 22). Linezolid-resistance was found in three isolates (PR 017/2, PR 012/1), showing complex resistance (7-9 antibiotics). PR 012, 017, 018, 027 and 046 isolates (n = 26) were resistant to 5-9 antibiotics. Twelve resistance profiles (2-9 antibiotics) were detected. Rifampicin-moxifloxacin-cefotaxime-erythromycin-clindamycin-imipenem-resistance was predominant, being expressed by 18 strains (PR 027/17, PR 018/1). PCR results suggested tetracycline-resistance to be induced by the gene tetM. Three tetM-positive isolates (PRs 012, 046), were also tndX-positive, suggesting the presence of a Tn5397-like element. Only two MLSB-resistant strains (PR 012) had the ermB gene and chloramphenicol-resistance determinant catD was not detected, leaving room for further investigating resistance mechanisms. Multidrug resistance could be attributed to most analysed strains, underlining, once more, the impact of wide-spectrum antimicrobial over prescription, still a tendency in our country, on transmission of antimicrobial resistance and emergence of epidemic C. difficile strains generating outbreaks.

European Practice for CDI Treatment

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Historically, two antibiotics (metronidazole and vancomycin) and a recent third (fidaxomicin) have been used routinely for CDI treatment; convincing data are now available showing that metronidazole is the least efficacious agent. The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases CDI treatment guidelines outline the treatment options for a variety of CDI clinical scenarios, including use of the more traditional anti-CDI therapies (e.g., metronidazole, vancomycin), the role of newer anti-CDI agents (e.g., fidaxomicin), indications for surgical intervention and for non-antimicrobial management (e.g., faecal microbiota transplantation, FMT). A 2017 survey of 20 European countries found that while the majority (n = 14) have national CDI guidelines that provide a variety of recommendations for CDI treatment, only five have audited guideline implementation. A variety of restrictions are in place in 13 (65%) countries prior to use of new anti-CDI treatments, including committee/infection specialist approval or economic review/restrictions. Novel anti-CDI agents are being evaluated in Phase III trials; it is not yet clear what will be the roles of these agents. Prophylaxis is an optimum approach to reduce the impact of CDI especially in high-risk populations; monoclonal antibodies, antibiotic blocking approaches and multiple vaccines are currently in advanced clinical trials. The treatment of recurrent CDI is particularly troublesome, and several different live bio therapeutics are being developed, in addition to FMT.

Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridium difficile

The rapid evolution of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile and the consequent effects on prevention and treatment of C. difficile infections (CDIs) are matter of concern for public health. Antibiotic resistance plays an important role in driving C. difficile epidemiology. Emergence of new types is often associated with the emergence of new resistances and most of epidemic C. difficile clinical isolates is currently resistant to multiple antibiotics. In particular, it is to worth to note the recent identification of strains with reduced susceptibility to the first-line antibiotics for CDI treatment and/or for relapsing infections. Antibiotic resistance in C. difficile has a multifactorial nature. Acquisition of genetic elements and alterations of the antibiotic target sites, as well as other factors, such as variations in the metabolic pathways and biofilm production, contribute to the survival of this pathogen in the presence of antibiotics. Different transfer mechanisms facilitate the spread of mobile elements among C. difficile strains and between C. difficile and other species. Furthermore, recent data indicate that both genetic elements and alterations in the antibiotic targets can be maintained in C. difficile regardless of the burden imposed on fitness, and therefore resistances may persist in C. difficile population in absence of antibiotic selective pressure.

Efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection is the most common health-care-associated infection in the USA. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ridinilazole versus vancomycin for treatment of C difficile infection.

METHODS

We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study. Participants with signs and symptoms of C difficile infection and a positive diagnostic test result were recruited from 33 centres in the USA and Canada and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral ridinilazole (200 mg every 12 h) or oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) for 10 days. The primary endpoint was achievement of a sustained clinical response, defined as clinical cure at the end of treatment and no recurrence within 30 days, which was used to establish non-inferiority (15% margin) of ridinilazole versus vancomycin. The primary efficacy analysis was done on a modified intention-to-treat population comprising all individuals with C difficile infection confirmed by the presence of free toxin in stool who were randomly assigned to receive one or more doses of the study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02092935.

FINDINGS

Between June 26, 2014, and August 31, 2015, 100 patients were recruited; 50 were randomly assigned to receive ridinilazole and 50 to vancomycin. 16 patients did not complete the study, and 11 discontinued treatment early. The primary efficacy analysis included 69 patients (n=36 in the ridinilazole group; n=33 in the vancomycin group). 24 of 36 (66·7%) patients in the ridinilazole group versus 14 of 33 (42·4%) of those in the vancomycin group had a sustained clinical response (treatment difference 21·1%, 90% CI 3·1-39·1, p=0·0004), establishing the non-inferiority of ridinilazole and also showing statistical superiority at the 10% level. Ridinilazole was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of vancomycin: 82% (41 of 50) of participants reported adverse events in the ridinilazole group and 80% (40 of 50) in the vancomycin group. There were no adverse events related to ridinilazole that led to discontinuation.

INTERPRETATION

Ridinilazole is a targeted-spectrum antimicrobial that shows potential in treatment of initial C difficile infection and in providing sustained benefit through reduction in disease recurrence. Further clinical development is warranted.

FUNDING

Wellcome Trust and Summit Therapeutics.

A Review of Experimental and Off-Label Therapies for Clostridium difficile Infection

In spite of increased awareness and the efforts taken to optimize Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) management, with the limited number of currently available antibiotics for C. difficile the halt of this increasing epidemic remains out of reach. There are, however, close to 80 alternative treatment methods with controversial anti-clostridial efficacy or in experimental phase today. Indeed, some of these therapies are expected to become acknowledged members of the recommended anti-CDI arsenal within the next few years. None of these alternative treatment methods can respond in itself to all the major challenges of CDI management, which are primary prophylaxis in the susceptible population, clinical cure of severe cases, prevention of recurrences, and forestallment of asymptomatic C. difficile carriage and in-hospital spread. Yet, the greater the variety of treatment choices on hand, the better combination strategies can be developed to reach these goals in the future. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of these experimental and currently off-label therapeutic options.

In Vitro Activities of MCB3681 and Eight Comparators against Clostridium difficile Isolates with Known Ribotypes and Diverse Geographical Spread

Treatments for Clostridium difficile infection remain limited, despite the introduction of fidaxomicin, and development of new agents is necessary. We determined the in vitro susceptibilities of 199 prevalent or emerging Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes to MCB3681, a novel investigational quinolonyl-oxazolidinone, and 8 comparators (metronidazole, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, tigecycline, and linezolid). MCB3681 showed good activity against C. difficile with no evidence of MCB3681 resistance in isolates showing either moxifloxacin or linezolid resistance or both moxifloxacin and linezolid resistance.

Ridinilazole: a novel therapy for Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of infectious healthcare-associated diarrhoea. Recurrent CDI increases disease morbidity and mortality, posing a high burden to patients and a growing economic burden to the healthcare system. Thus, there exists a significant unmet and increasing medical need for new therapies for CDI. This review aims to provide a concise summary of CDI in general and a specific update on ridinilazole (formerly SMT19969), a novel antibacterial currently under development for the treatment of CDI. Owing to its highly targeted spectrum of activity and ability to spare the normal gut microbiota, ridinilazole provides significant advantages over metronidazole and vancomycin, the mainstay antibiotics for CDI. Ridinilazole is bactericidal against C. difficile and exhibits a prolonged post-antibiotic effect. Furthermore, treatment with ridinilazole results in decreased toxin production. A phase 1 trial demonstrated that oral ridinilazole is well tolerated and specifically targets clostridia whilst sparing other faecal bacteria. Phase 2 and 3 trials will hopefully further our understanding of the clinical utility of ridinilazole for the treatment of CDI.

New antibiotics in clinical trials for Clostridium difficile

INTRODUCTION

There are limited number of approved therapies for C. difficile infections (CDIs) and new treatments are needed to decrease recurrence rates. Over the past 5 years, four novel antibiotics have been evaluated in clinical trials that offer distinct advantages over existing therapies for the treatment of CDI.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the preclinical and clinical studies of cadazolid, LFF571, ridinilazole, and surotomycin. The advantages that these antibiotics may have in the treatment of CDI is compared with current therapies metronidazole, vancomycin, and fidaxomicin. Expert commentary: The antibiotics examined have the potential to improve rates of CDI treatment without recurrence. We anticipate that one or more of these medications will be approved within five years.