Teicoplanin versus nafcillin and vancomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Treatment of Infection and Colonization Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The mechanism of methicillin resistance confers resistance to all available B-lactam antibiotics; consequently, B-lactam antibiotics have no role in therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Vancomycin remains the drug of choice. Teicoplanin and daptomycin are two investigational antibiotics related to vancomycin in structure and in spectrum of activity. In clinical trials employing relatively low doses, neither was as effective as vancomycin. Trials at higher doses are on-going. Quinolones, ciprofloxacin in particular, have been used successfully to treat infections caused by MRSA; however, the usefulness of quinolones may be limited by the tendency of resistance to emerge during therapy. Quinolones probably should be used only in combination with another active agent, such as rifampin, when treating serious infections caused by MRSA. Other agents may be active in vitro against MRSA, but clinical data showing their effectiveness are lacking. Rifampin combination regimens appear most effectively to eradicate colonization with MRSA.

Comparison of six generic vancomycin products for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus experimental endocarditis in rabbits

Concerns have recently emerged about the potency and the quality of generic vancomycin (VAN) products approved for use in humans, based on experiments in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. However, other animal models may be more appropriate to decipher the bactericidal activities of VAN generics in vivo and to predict their efficacy in humans. We aimed to compare the bactericidal activities of six generic VAN products currently used in France (Mylan and Sandoz), Spain (Hospira), Switzerland (Teva), and the United States (Akorn-Strides and American Pharmaceutical Products [APP]) in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis induced by 8 × 10(7) CFU of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain COL (VAN MIC, 1.5 μg/ml). In vitro, there were no significant differences in the time-kill curve studies performed with the six generic VAN products. Ten rabbits in each group were treated with intravenous (i.v.) VAN, 60 mg/kg of body weight twice a day (b.i.d.) for 4 days. Mean peak serum VAN levels, measured 45 min after the last injection, ranged from 35.5 (APP) to 45.9 μg/ml (Teva). Mean trough serum VAN levels, measured 12 h after the last injection, ranged from 2.3 (Hospira) to 9.2 (APP) μg/ml. All generic VAN products were superior to controls (no treatment) in terms of residual organisms in vegetations (P < 0.02 for each comparison) and in the spleen (P < 0.005 for each comparison). Pairwise comparisons of generic VAN products found no significant differences. In conclusion, a stringent MRSA endocarditis model found no significant differences in the bactericidal activities of six generic VAN products currently used in Europe and America.

Impact of high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

We evaluated the impact of high (9.5 log10 CFU/g) and moderate (5.5 log10 CFU/g) inocula of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA, respectively) on the activities of nafcillin, linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations over 72 h. Human therapeutic dosing regimens for nafcillin, daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and gentamicin were simulated. At a moderate inoculum, nafcillin (MSSA only), vancomycin, and daptomycin demonstrated equivalent and significant (P < 0.01) bactericidal (99.9% kill) activities (decreases of 3.34 +/- 1.1, 3.28 +/- 0.4, and 3.34 +/- 0.8 log10 CFU/g, respectively). Bactericidal activity was demonstrated at 4 h for nafcillin and daptomycin and at 32 h for vancomycin. Linezolid demonstrated bacteriostatic activity over the course of the study period. At a high inoculum, daptomycin exhibited bactericidal activity against both MSSA and MRSA by 24 h (decrease of 5.51 to 6.31 +/- 0.10 log10 CFU/g). Nafcillin (versus MSSA), vancomycin, and linezolid (MSSA and MRSA) did not achieve bactericidal activity throughout the 72-h experiment. The addition of gentamicin increased the rate of 99.9% kill to 8 h for daptomycin (P < 0.01) and 48 h for nafcillin (MSSA only) (P = 0.01). The addition of gentamicin did not improve the activity of vancomycin or linezolid for either isolate for the 72-h period. Overall, high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus had a significant impact on the activities of nafcillin and vancomycin. In contrast, daptomycin was affected minimally and linezolid was not affected by inoculum.

Glycopeptides are no more effective than beta-lactam agents for prevention of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether a switch from beta-lactams to glycopeptides for cardiac surgery prophylaxis should be advised. Results of 7 randomized trials (5761 procedures) that compared surgical site infections (SSIs) in subjects receiving glycopeptide prophylaxis with SSIs in those who received beta -lactam prophylaxis were pooled. Neither agent proved to be superior for prevention of the primary outcome, occurrence of SSI at 30 days (risk ratio [RR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.42). In subanalyses, beta-lactams were superior to glycopeptides for prevention of chest SSIs (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.11-1.95) and approached superiority for prevention of deep-chest SSIs (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.91-1.94) and SSIs caused by gram-positive bacteria (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.98-1.91). Glycopeptides approached superiority to beta-lactams for prevention of leg SSIs (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.01) and were superior for prevention of SSIs caused by methicillin-resistant gram-positive bacteria (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.90). Standard prophylaxis for cardiac surgery should continue to be beta-lactams in most circumstances.

Vancomycin treatment failure associated with heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a patient with endocarditis and in the rabbit model of endocarditis

Heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin is thought to precede emergence of intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus, but the clinical significance of heterogeneous resistance is unknown. Paired S. aureus isolates from a patient with endocarditis who relapsed after vancomycin treatment were tested for heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin. The pretreatment and the relapse clinical isolates (strains SF1 and SF2, respectively) were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Susceptibility to vancomycin was assessed by the broth dilution method, population analysis, and time-kill studies and in the rabbit model of endocarditis. Strains SF1 and SF2 had similar genotypes, and the vancomycin MICs for the strains were </=2 micro g/ml. SF2 exhibited heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin. Vancomycin eradicated SF1 in the rabbit model of endocarditis, while SF2 persisted at pretreatment levels. Vancomycin treatment failure in this patient with endocarditis was attributable to heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin.

Lysostaphin treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve endocarditis

The emergence of clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin has prompted a search for new and novel therapeutic agents active against S. aureus. Lysostaphin, a peptidase produced by Staphylococcus simulans, specifically cleaves the glycine-glycine bonds unique to the interpeptide cross-bridge of the S. aureus cell wall. The effectiveness of various regimens of dosing with intravenous lysostaphin was compared to that of vancomycin in the rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis caused by a clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolate. All animals were treated for a total of 3 days. The most active regimen, lysostaphin given three times daily, produced sterile vegetations in 10 of 11 treated rabbits, with a mean reduction in vegetation bacterial counts of 8.5 log10 CFU/g compared to the counts in the untreated controls. In contrast, vancomycin given twice daily sterilized no vegetations and reduced vegetation bacterial counts by only 4.8 log10 CFU/g. Lysostaphin given once daily was less effective, reducing mean vegetation bacterial counts by only 3.6 log10 CFU/g, but the combination of lysostaphin once daily and vancomycin twice daily reduced the mean vegetation bacterial density by 7.5 log10 CFU/g, a result that was significantly better than that for either regimen alone (P < 0.05). Lysostaphin was well tolerated by the rabbits, with no evidence of immunological reactions following up to 9 weeks of intravenous administration. We conclude that lysostaphin given alone or in combination with vancomycin is more effective in the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant S. aureus aortic valve endocarditis than vancomycin alone.

Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci

Recent emergence of vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) has posed a new threat to hospital infection control and antibiotic chemotherapy. Relatively low-level resistance of VRSA compared to that of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and prevalence of S. aureus clinical strains heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin (hetero-VRSA), challenge the value of routine antibiotic susceptibility tests as a tool for the prediction of clinical efficacy of vancomycin therapy. This review summarizes the history of emergence of glycopeptide resistance in staphylococci and considers the mechanism of resistance in these organisms.

Vancomycin or vancomycin plus netilmicin for methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve experimental endocarditis

Using a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis, we studied the efficacy of vancomycin alone or in combination with netilmicin and/or rifampin against a methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MGRSA). Antibiotics were given for 6 to 12 days, as follows: vancomycin (15 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h [BID] intravenously), vancomycin plus netilmicin (2.5 mg/kg BID intramuscularly), vancomycin plus rifampin (10 mg/kg BID intramuscularly), and vancomycin plus netilmicin plus rifampin at the same routes, dosages, and schedules mentioned above. Netilmicin was given to two additional groups at a higher dosage (6 mg/kg every 24 h intramuscularly) alone or in combination with vancomycin (15 mg/kg BID intravenously) for 12 days. All regimens resulted in undetectable bacterial counts in a significant proportion of vegetations (except netilmicin alone) or reduced the bacterial counts in the vegetations compared with the counts in the untreated controls (P<0.01 to P<0.001). No resistance to rifampin or netilmicin developed during therapy. It is concluded that in the treatment of experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by MGRSA (i) vancomycin as monotherapy is as efficacious as the triple combination, (ii) the addition of netilmicin (once daily or BID) to vancomycin does not improve the efficacy of the latter antibiotic, even in the presence of rifampin, and (iii) a 12-day course in more effective than a 6-day one, but not at a statistically significant level.

Treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and antibiotics that inhibit cell wall synthesis

Using two strains of Staphylococcus aureus, one susceptible and one heterogeneously resistant to methicillin, for which MICs and MBCs of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) were 0.06 and 0.06 micrograms/ml and 0.06 and 0.25 microgram/ml, respectively (concentrations are those of TMP), we studied the efficacies of TMP-SMX and cloxacillin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin for treatment of experimental staphylococcal endocarditis. Rabbits were treated with dosages of TMP-SMX selected to achieve concentrations in serum equivalent to that obtained in humans treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. The overall mortality rate of rabbits treated with TMP-SMX was 84% at day 3, not different from that of the control groups (P > 0.1). No sterile vegetations were observed to be present in control groups or in animals treated with TMP-SMX. However, 26, 60, and 75% of rabbits treated with teicoplanin, cloxacillin, and vancomycin, respectively, showed sterile vegetations. For methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), the mean vegetation counts were not significantly different between the control group and the group treated with TMP-SMX (P > 0.1). For methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), treatment with TMP-SMX was more effective than no therapy, decreasing the number of organisms in vegetations (P < 0.01). For both strains, therapy with cloxacillin and therapy with teicoplanin or vancomycin were significantly more effective than therapy with TMP-SMX. Despite high concentrations of teicoplanin in serum which exceeded MBCs for staphylococci more than 50 times at the peak and 10 times at the trough, therapy with cloxacillin or vancomycin was superior to therapy with teicoplanin against both MSSA and MRSA. These data do not support the use of TMP-SMX in treatment of endocarditis and other severe staphylococcal infections with high bacterial counts.

Bactericidal activities of teicoplanin, vancomycin, and gentamicin alone and in combination against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of endocarditis

We adapted an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of infection to incorporate simulated endocardial vegetations. The bactericidal activities of teicoplanin, vancomycin, gentamicin, and various combinations of these drugs were studied against a strain of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus obtained from a patient being treated for endocarditis at Detroit Receiving Hospital. Bacteria were grown overnight, concentrated, and added to a mixture of cryoprecipitate (80%) and thrombin (10%) to achieve approximately 5 x 10(9) CFU/g. Fibrin clots (8 to 10) were suspended into the model, removed at 24, 48, and 72 h in duplicate, weighed, and homogenized in 1.25% trypsin. Control experiments were conducted to characterize the growth kinetics. The following antibiotics were administered to simulate the pharmacokinetics of the drugs in humans: teicoplanin at 3 and 15 mg/kg of body weight, vancomycin at 15 mg/kg, and gentamicin at 1 mg/kg. Fibrin clot samples used to detect resistance were plated on antibiotic-containing tryptic soy agar plates. For the teicoplanin and vancomycin regimens, protein binding to cryoprecipitate, thrombin, and fibrin clot was determined to be 32, 43, and 50% and 26, 28, and 29%, respectively. In comparison with no treatment, vancomycin or teicoplanin at 15 mg/kg or either of these regimens combined with gentamicin significantly reduced bacterial counts (P < 0.0001). Monotherapy with teicoplanin at 3 mg/kg or gentamicin resulted in no killing activity. Combination treatment with teicoplanin at 3 mg/kg and gentamicin resulted in the killing of approximately 2 log10 CFU/g by 72 h and the development of resistance to gentamicin. The results obtained with the in vitro model of endocarditis are similar to the results reported by several investigators with the rabbit model of infective endocarditis. This unique infection model is useful for designing initial drug dosage regimens and may be predictive of drug efficacy against infective endocarditis.

Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The prophylactic and therapeutic activities of teicoplanin were evaluated in two different experimental models of foreign body infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In a guinea pig model of prophylaxis, subcutaneously implanted tissue cages were infected at a > 90% rate by 10(2) CFU of MRSA in control animals. A single dose of 30 mg of teicoplanin per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally 6 h before bacterial challenge was as effective as vancomycin in preventing experimental infection in tissue cages injected with either 10(2), 10(3), or 10(4) CFU of MRSA. In a rat model evaluating the therapy of chronic tissue cage infection caused by MRSA, the efficacy of a 7-day high-dose (30 mg/kg once daily) regimen of teicoplanin was compared with that of vancomycin (50 mg/kg twice daily). Whereas high levels of teicoplanin were found in tissue cage fluid, continuously exceeding its MBC for MRSA by 8- to 16-fold, no significant reduction in the viable counts of MRSA occurred during therapy. In contrast, either vancomycin alone or a combined regimen of high-dose teicoplanin plus rifampin (25 mg/kg twice daily) could significantly decrease the viable counts in tissue cage fluids. Whereas the bacteria recovered from tissue cage fluids during therapy showed no evidence of teicoplanin resistance, they failed to be killed even by high levels of this antimicrobial agent. The altered susceptibility of in vivo growing bacteria to teicoplanin killing might in part explain the defective activity of this antimicrobial agent when used as monotherapy against chronic S. aureus infections. These data may indicate the need for a combined regimen of teicoplanin with other agents such as rifampin to optimize the therapy of severe staphylococcal infections.

Antibiotic penetration of and bactericidal activity within endothelial cells

It has been observed that the number of cases of infective endocarditis arising in patients who have no previous identifiable cardiac abnormalities is increasing, suggesting that direct bacterial interactions with endothelium may occur. Furthermore, the prolonged natural history of endocarditis, need for lengthy therapy, and frequency of relapse suggest that intracellular bacteria that may be protected from antimicrobial action and host responses exist. Using high-performance liquid chromatography, we investigated the penetration of seven antibiotics used to treat Staphylococcus aureus infections into cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells and the effect of these antibiotics on the intracellular killing of two strains of the organism. In general, endothelial cell penetration of lipophilic drugs, such as minocycline, ciprofloxacin, and rifampin, exceeded that of hydrophilic drugs, represented by nafcillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, and vancomycin. Bacterial killing paralleled the intracellular penetration of all the antibiotics except rifampin, which concentrated well inside cells but had poor killing activity. However, when combined with the other antibiotics, rifampin potentiated their killing activity against intracellular S. aureus.

Beta-lactams versus glycopeptides in treatment of subcutaneous abscesses infected with Staphylococcus aureus

The antibacterial efficacies of the beta-lactam antibiotics nafcillin and cefazolin were compared with those of the glycopeptide antibiotics vancomycin and teicoplanin in rats with subcutaneous abscesses infected with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Animals were treated with antibiotics or diluent for 3 or 7 days. Rats receiving any antibiotic treatment, with the exception of teicoplanin-treated animals at day 7, had lower bacterial counts in their abscesses than did controls at days 3 and 7. Rats in the nafcillin and cefazolin treatment groups had lower bacterial counts in their abscesses than did rats in the vancomycin and teicoplanin treatment groups at days 3 and 7. The beta-lactam antibiotics were more effective therapy than the glycopeptide antibiotics in rats with subcutaneous abscesses infected with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. In vitro, animal, and clinical data comparing beta-lactam and glycopeptide treatment of S. aureus infections were reviewed along with the resulting treatment recommendations.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--an overview

Methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cause life-threatening infections, but they are no more pathogenic than methicillin-sensitive strains. Difficulties occur because of incorrect or missed identification of MRSA, and hence inappropriate or ineffective treatment of infections. Therapeutic options are severely limited and the increasing spectrum of resistance in MRSA is worrying. However, new methods of detection and new agents for treatment are being developed in response to the challenge of MRSA. Whilst the organism is a problem and control measures are necessary to contain its spread, the outlook is not bleak. In the medium term, the development of new, effective anti-MRSA agents should prevent the threat of MRSA becoming any greater in the field of hospital infection control.

Teicoplanin pharmacokinetics in intravenous drug abusers being treated for bacterial endocarditis

The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin were determined after multiple 30-min intravenous infusions of 10 to 15 mg/kg every 12 to 24 h in 11 intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) patients being treated for bacterial endocarditis. Multiple serum samples were obtained over 7 to 14 days. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were obtained on days 1 and 5. Serum concentration-time data were analyzed by using multiple-dose pharmacokinetic analysis (NONLIN84). Results were compared with pharmacokinetic parameters derived from previous studies in normal healthy volunteers following multiple intravenous infusions of teicoplanin (3 to 6 mg/kg/day). Total and renal clearances of teicoplanin in IVDA patients were found to be significantly greater and more highly variable than those observed previously in normal healthy volunteers. As a result, predicted steady-state trough concentrations in serum may vary up to fivefold. The mechanism responsible for this variation appears to be related to the glomerular filtration rate. In IVDA patients, individualized teicoplanin dosage may be required in the treatment of bacterial endocarditis.

Comparison of the effectiveness of various antibiotics in the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus experimental infective endocarditis

The effectiveness of various antibiotics was tested in the eradication of a strain of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) of cardiac vegetations, in an experimental model of endocarditis in rabbits. Twelve animals comprised the control group and 48 the treated ones. After inducing the experimental endocarditis, the animals were treated for three days; then mortality, blood cultures at 48 and 72 hours and the title of the colony forming units per gram of vegetation (CFU/g) were evaluated. Imipenem and the cloxacillin-gentamicin association were found to be as effective as cloxacillin in eradicating the microorganisms of the vegetation. Clindamycin in high doses was shown to be a valid alternative. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, rifampin and ciprofloxacin were less effective than cloxacillin. The experimental model seems to be an effective method for evaluating antimicrobial treatments in staphylococcal endocarditis.

Treatment of infection and colonization caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The mechanism of methicillin resistance confers resistance to all available beta-lactam antibiotics; consequently, beta-lactam antibiotics have no role in therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Vancomycin remains the drug of choice. Teicoplanin and daptomycin are two investigational antibiotics related to vancomycin in structure and in spectrum of activity. In clinical trials employing relatively low doses, neither was as effective as vancomycin. Trials at higher doses are on-going. Quinolones, ciprofloxacin in particular, have been used successfully to treat infections caused by MRSA; however, the usefulness of quinolones may be limited by the tendency of resistance to emerge during therapy. Quinolones probably should be used only in combination with another active agent, such as rifampin, when treating serious infections caused by MRSA. Other agents may be active in vitro against MRSA, but clinical data showing their effectiveness are lacking. Rifampin combination regimens appear most effectively to eradicate colonization with MRSA.

Antistaphylococcal activities of teicoplanin and vancomycin in vitro and in an experimental infection

The efficacies of vancomycin and teicoplanin in an experimental Staphylococcus aureus infection in granulocytopenic mice were related to their activities in vitro and their pharmacokinetic profiles. In vitro teicoplanin had a higher intrinsic activity than vancomycin did; and it also had a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, resulting in higher peak concentrations in plasma, a longer elimination half-life, and a larger area under the concentration-time curve than those of vancomycin. To predict the antibacterial efficacies of the drugs in vivo on the basis of their activities in vitro and pharmacokinetics, a mathematical model was applied. In the model the in vitro effect was expressed as the difference in growth rate between control cultures and those in the presence of the antibiotic (ER), and the in vivo effect was expressed as the difference between numbers of CFU in control and antibiotic-treated animals (EN). The integral of ER against time, ERt, was calculated by using the concentrations found in vivo. A significant linear relationship was found between EN and ERt for different dosages at the same times (4 h) after drug administration as well as for the same doses at consecutive times, although at the lowest doses of teicoplanin the observed effect was less than the predicted effect.

Teicoplanin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic with a molecular structure which is related to that of vancomycin. Gram-positive bacteria such as staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant strains), streptococci, enterococci and many anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria are susceptible to teicoplanin in vitro. Teicoplanin has an exceptionally long half-life, allowing once-daily intramuscular or intravenous administration. Teicoplanin is clinically and bacteriologically effective against a wide variety of Gram-positive infections such as septicaemia, endocarditis, skin and soft tissue infections and infections associated with venous catheters. The drug is equally efficacious against methicillin-resistant and -susceptible staphylococci. Adverse effects with teicoplanin are generally limited to local effects or hypersensitivity reactions. While teicoplanin has the potential for ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity, the incidence appears to be quite low when recommended serum concentrations are maintained. Teicoplanin is a valuable alternative to vancomycin, and providing controlled comparative studies prove equivalent safety and efficacy between the 2 glycopeptides the more easily administered teicoplanin should become the preferred antibacterial agent.

Efficacy of teicoplanin in two dosage regimens for experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin

Optimal therapy for the treatment of infections caused by strains of enterococci demonstrating high-level resistance to gentamicin and other aminoglycosides has not been established. The present study examined the efficacy of teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic active against gram-positive bacterial infections in various animal models, in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin. Vancomycin was used as a comparative antibiotic. In the first set of experiments, both antimicrobial agents were administered by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days at dosages which yielded comparable mean levels in serum (plus or minus the standard deviation) of 14.6 +/- 4.3 micrograms/ml for teicoplanin and 14.3 +/- 2.2 micrograms/ml for vancomycin. These regimens proved similarly effective in sterilizing cardiac vegetations (38 versus 50% of treated animals, respectively; P greater than 0.05). Mean (plus or minus the standard deviation) residual bacterial titers within vegetations were reduced to 3.2 +/- 1.2 log10 CFU/g and 3.4 +/- 1.7 log10 CFU/g, respectively. In separate experiments, the potential of teicoplanin to cure endocarditis was assessed, using two dosage regimens: (i) 30 mg/kg per day (mean level in serum, 13 micrograms/ml) for 10 days or (ii) 150 mg/kg per day (mean level in serum, 84 micrograms/ml) for 5 days. Surviving animals were sacrificed 10 days after the discontinuation of therapy. Both teicoplanin regimens were more effective than the comparative vancomycin (150 mg/kg per day) regimen: 92 versus 43% cured (P =0.025) in the standard-dose group, and 82 versus 37% cured (P = 0.015) in the high-dose group. Results in this rat model of enterococcal endocarditis show that teicoplanin may prove useful in the treatment of serious infections due to high level-gentamicin-resistant enterococci in humans.

Teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive-bacterial endocarditis

Intravenous teicoplanin has been used to treat 23 cases of gram-positive-bacterial endocarditis, usually with 3 to 7 mg/kg every 12 h on the first day, followed by 3 to 7 mg/kg every 24 h. For some cases (staphylococcal and enterococcal endocarditis), the dosage was 8 to 14.4 mg/kg per day and/or other antibiotics were given. The mean duration was 48.2 days (range, 23 to 130 days). Of 23 patients, 21 (91.3%) had negative cultures or were cured. A total of 18 patients were treated with teicoplanin alone; of these, 4 had surgery, and all (except 2 who relapsed) were cured. Teicoplanin was combined with one or more antibiotics in five cases; in all cases appropriate cultures were negative, but three patients died during therapy or follow-up. Mild renal impairment was seen in two patients; both were receiving teicoplanin in combination with an aminoglycoside. We conclude that intravenous teicoplanin administered once a day at doses of 7 to 14 mg/kg per day is well tolerated, easy to administer, and may represent an efficacious therapy for gram-positive-bacterial endocarditis.

Evaluation of teicoplanin for treatment of endocarditis caused by gram-positive cocci in 20 patients

Teicoplanin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic similar to vancomycin, was evaluated for the treatment of bacterial endocarditis in an open multicenter study from May 1985 to August 1987. A total of 20 patients with positive blood culture endocarditis received teicoplanin once daily as a mean intravenous injection of 7.3 mg/kg of body weight (range, 4.8 to 10.6 mg/kg); in 17 patients, teicoplanin was combined with another antibiotic, usually an aminoglycoside. The mean duration of therapy was 28 days (range, 7 to 66 days). The diagnosis of endocarditis was confirmed by echocardiography or anatomical findings in 15 patients and established on the basis of clinical manifestations plus positive blood cultures in 5 patients. The tricuspid valve was involved in 11 of the 20 patients. Isolates from blood were 12 Staphylococcus aureus, 1 Staphylococcus hominis, 1 Micrococcus sedentarius, 1 Enterococcus faecalis, 3 Streptococcus bovis, and 2 nongroupable Streptococcus sp. At the end of therapy, bacterial eradication was achieved in 17 of 20 patients (85%), and a favorable clinical outcome had occurred in 14 of 17 evaluable patients (82%). Of these 14 patients, one relapsed 4 months after the end of treatment. Thus, teicoplanin was effective in 13 of 17 patients (76%). Mean peak levels of teicoplanin in serum were lower, 23.1 +/- 2.9 micrograms/ml, in patients who failed than in those who were cured (45.8 +/- 8.4 micrograms/ml). Side effects occurred in 7 of 20 patients (35%), and required premature discontinuation of teicoplanin in 3 patients. These side effects were fever in three patients, rash in three patients, hearing loss in two patients, and increased serum transaminase levels in two patients. This study demonstrates the efficacy of teicoplanin in the treatment of endocarditis and the need for achieving peak levels in serum close to 40 micrograms/ml. Teicoplanin should now be further evaluated in endocarditis caused by gram-positive cocci means of controlled comparative study with standard therapy.

Methicillin-resistant staphylococci

Strains of staphylococci resistant to methicillin were identified immediately after introduction of this drug. Methicillin-resistant strains have unusual properties, the most notable of which is extreme variability in expression of the resistance trait. The conditions associated with this heterogeneous expression of resistance are described. Methicillin resistance is associated with production of a unique penicillin-binding protein (PBP), 2a, which is bound and inactivated only at high concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics. PBP2a appears to be encoded by the mec determinant, which also is unique to methicillin-resistant strains. The relationships between PBP2a and expression of resistance and implications for the mechanism of resistance are discussed. The heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance by staphylococci poses problems in the detection of resistant strains. Experience with several susceptibility test methods is reviewed and guidelines for performance of these tests are given. Treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci is discussed. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice. Alternatives have been few because methicillin-resistant strains often are resistant to multiple antibiotics in addition to beta-lactam antibiotics. New agents which are active against methicillin-resistant staphylococci are becoming available, and their potential role in treatment is discussed.

Poor efficacy of teicoplanin in treatment of deep-seated staphylococcal infections

Teicoplanin in a 400 mg intravenous loading dose followed by 200 mg/day intravenously or intramuscularly was given to 19 patients with deep-seated staphylococcal infections. Only eight patients (44.4%) were considered cured, failure mostly being observed in patients with osteomyelitis, endocarditis and bacteremia. Poor tissue kinetics of teicoplanin and the presence of foreign bodies are probable explanations for the reported failures. Future trials using a higher dose of teicoplanin with or without the addition of rifampicin or gentamicin seem to be justified.

Effect of NaCl and nafcillin on penicillin-binding protein 2a and heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Expression of methicillin resistance in heterogeneous strains of Staphylococcus aureus is enhanced by 2 to 5% NaCl in the medium and by selection with beta-lactam antibiotics. Resistance is associated with production of a penicillin-binding protein (PBP), PBP 2a, with low affinity for binding beta-lactam antibiotics. Therefore, the effects of NaCl and nafcillin on amounts of PBP 2a produced and its binding affinity were examined and correlated with expression of resistance. Nafcillin-triggered autolysis also was examined. No relationships between the level of resistance expressed and (i) relative amounts of PBP 2a, (ii) inducibility of PBP 2a by nafcillin, or (iii) binding affinity of nafcillin for PBP 2a were found. A protective effect of NaCl for the susceptible subpopulation, corresponding to inhibition of autolysis, was observed for heterogeneous strains. Even in the absence of NaCl, highly resistant cells were relatively tolerant to nafcillin-triggered autolysis. These results support the hypothesis that high levels of resistance require an additional factor besides PBP 2a. This factor may act within the autolytic pathway.

Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in critically ill patients with various degrees of renal impairment

The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin were studied in 15 adult patients in the acute phase of severe infections caused by gram-positive cocci. All the subjects were given a daily intravenous bolus dose of 6 mg of teicoplanin kg-1 (body weight). The pharmacokinetic study was performed over a 48-h period after injection 4. The subjects were categorized according to their mean creatinine clearances (ml.min-1.kg-1) during the study period: group 1 (n = 3), greater than 1.6; group 2 (n = 6), 0.8 to 1.6; and group 3 (n = 6), 0.15 to 0.8. Mean concentrations of teicoplanin in serum at 1, 24, and 48 h were 33 +/- 8, 9 +/- 3, and 6 +/- 2.5 micrograms.ml-1, respectively. The mean half-lives of the concentration-time curve from 12 to 48 h were 28 +/- 4, 44 +/- 24, and 48 +/- 14 h in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (group 3 versus group 1: P less than 0.05). The mean area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h was 344 +/- 92 mg.h.liter-1, and the mean hybrid volume of distribution was 1.09 +/- 0.46 liter.kg-1. These values were similar for the three groups, with a trend for larger areas under the curve in group 3. Creatinine clearance correlated directly with the total body clearance of teicoplanin (r = 0.70) and with the renal clearance of teicoplanin (r = 0.82). However, in critically ill patients, the wide interindividual variations in pharmacokinetic parameters are more relevant than those related to the variations in renal function when creatinine clearance is above 0.30 ml.min-1.kg-1. We concluded that, in such conditions, monitoring of concentrations of teicoplanin in serum is mandatory.

The use of a new glycopeptide antibiotic, teicoplanin, in the treatment of bacterial endocarditis

Teicoplanin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic, has been used to treat twelve patients with bacterial endocarditis due to Gram-positive organisms. Teicoplanin has activity against Gram-positive bacteria similar to vancomycin but therapeutic levels are maintained by a single daily dose, given as an intravenous bolus. Of six patients with native valve infections, two cases, due to viridans streptococci, were successfully treated with teicoplanin alone and two others, caused by Streptococcus faecalis, were cured by combinations including teicoplanin. One of these patients sustained high tone hearing loss during treatment. The remaining two patients were drug addicts with endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus which recurred despite repeated multiple therapy. Of six prosthetic valve infections, antibiotic combinations including teicoplanin cured three cases, caused by streptococci. Infection persisted or treatment was curtailed in three cases of Staphylococcus epidermidis endocarditis. In this small open study, teicoplanin appeared as effective as vancomycin in the treatment of endocarditis but had the considerable advantage of ease of administration.

Serum bactericidal titer as a predictor of outcome in endocarditis

A study was conducted in 89 rabbits with experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by three different strains of Staphylococcus aureus to determine whether there was a correlation between the peak serum bactericidal titer of the four drugs tested and the vegetation titer. After four days of therapy both the rabbits with and those without sterile vegetations had median peak bactericidal titers of 1 : 8. The mean vegetation titers did not correlate with the mean bactericidal titers. The serum bactericidal test does not measure the relative rate of killing of the bacteria by the drugs. Although the test remains clinically useful for documentation of bactericidal activity, the minimum level of activity necessary for the test to serve as a predictor of outcome remains to be defined.

Clinical evaluation of teicoplanin for therapy of severe infections caused by gram-positive bacteria

Teicoplanin was evaluated in 47 patients with severe infections, including 14 patients with bone infections, 11 patients with soft-tissue infections, 7 patients with endocarditis, 5 patients with pneumonia, 3 patients with septic thrombophlebitis, 3 patients with septicemia of unknown origin, and 4 patients with miscellaneous infections. Overall, bacteremia was documented in 24 patients. The pathogens isolated were 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus (including 8 methicillin-resistant strains), 4 strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis, 4 strains of Streptococcus faecalis, 2 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 5 strains of other streptococci, and 1 Micrococcus luteus strain. A total of 22 patients (46.8%) were clinically cured, 8 patients (17.0%) improved, 2 patients (4.3%) had relapses after initial improvement, and 15 patients (31.9%) failed to respond. The results were better in nonbacteremic patients (19 of 23 patients [82.6%] were cured or improved) than in patients with bacteremia (12 of 24 patients [50%] were cured or improved). Bacteriological cure occurred in 25 patients (53.2%), and superinfections were documented in 6 patients (12.8%). No major adverse effects were observed. We conclude that teicoplanin is a potentially effective and well-tolerated antimicrobial agent for therapy of nonbacteremic infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.