Therapeutic efficacy of cefadroxil and cephalexin for pneumonia in a rat test model

Penetration of Ertapenem Into Different Pulmonary Compartments of Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery

Ertapenem is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but its in vivo penetration into lung tissue (LT), epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar cells (AC) is unknown. Fifteen patients undergoing thoracotomy were treated with 1 g intravenously for perioperative prophylaxis. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed 1, 3, and 5 hours after ertapenem infusion. Normal LT was sampled at the time of lung extraction. Blood was collected before and at different time points up to 24 hours after infusion. Mean concentrations of ertapenem in plasma, ELF, and AC were at 1.0 hour, 63.1, 4.06, 0.004 mg/L; at 3.0 hours, 39.7, 2.59, 0.003 mg/L; and at 5.0 hours, 27.2, 2.83, 0.007 mg/L. Mean (range) concentration in LT was 7.60 (2.5-19.4) mg/kg tissue 1.5 to 4.5 hours after infusion. In plasma, ertapenem exhibited a Cmax of 94.7 +/- 23.3 mg/L and an AUC(0-last) of 501.1 +/- 266.3 mg x h/L. These results, combined with the reported (MIC)90 of most CAP bacteria, support the previously observed clinical efficacy of ertapenem in the treatment of CAP.

The role of carbapenems in the treatment of severe nosocomial respiratory tract infections

The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria continues to increase, particularly in patients in the intensive care unit with nosocomial pneumonia. The intention of this review is to provide an overview of severe nosocomial pneumonia, carbapenems and the problem of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Attention was focused on the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem. Issues on the impact of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for nosocomial pneumonia patients considered at risk for resistant pathogens are discussed. Critical decision making regarding the use of carbapenems for treating severe nosocomial pneumonia requires careful consideration of the four Ds of optimal antimicrobial therapy: right Drug, right Dose, De-escalated to pathogen-directed therapy and right Duration of therapy.

Distribution and function of the peptide transporter PEPT2 in normal and cystic fibrosis human lung

BACKGROUND

Aerosol administration of peptide based drugs has an important role in the treatment of various pulmonary and systemic diseases. The characterisation of pulmonary peptide transport pathways can lead to new strategies in aerosol drug treatment.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry and ex vivo uptake studies were established to assess the distribution and activity of the beta-lactam transporting high affinity proton coupled peptide transporter PEPT2 in normal and cystic fibrosis human airway tissue.

RESULTS

PEPT2 immunoreactivity in normal human airways was localised to cells of the tracheal and bronchial epithelium and the endothelium of small vessels. In peripheral lung immunoreactivity was restricted to type II pneumocytes. In sections of cystic fibrosis lung a similar pattern of distribution was obtained with signals localised to endothelial cells, airway epithelium, and type II pneumocytes. Functional ex vivo uptake studies with fresh lung specimens led to an uptake of the fluorophore conjugated dipeptide derivative D-Ala-L-Lys-AMCA into bronchial epithelial cells and type II pneumocytes. This uptake was competitively inhibited by dipeptides and cephalosporins but not ACE inhibitors, indicating a substrate specificity as described for PEPT2.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide evidence for the expression and function of the peptide transporter PEPT2 in the normal and cystic fibrosis human respiratory tract and suggest that PEPT2 is likely to play a role in the transport of pulmonary peptides and peptidomimetics.

Localization of the peptide transporter PEPT2 in the lung: implications for pulmonary oligopeptide uptake

Pulmonary delivery of peptidomimetic antibiotics is frequently used for local drug therapy in pulmonary infections. Identification of transport pathways into airway epithelia can lead to new strategies of therapy. Here we describe the distribution of the beta-lactam-transporting high-affinity proton-coupled peptide transporter PEPT2 in mammalian lungs. Using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Northern blot analysis, PEPT2-mRNA was detected in lung extracts. The expression of PEPT2-mRNA and protein was localized to alveolar type II pneumocytes, bronchial epithelium, and endothelium of small arteries of rat lung by nonisotopic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. In addition, transport studies using murine whole-organ preparations revealed transporter-mediated uptake of a fluorophore-conjugated dipeptide derivative into bronchial epithelial cells and type II pneumocytes. This transport was competitively inhibited by cephalosporins and dipeptides that are reported as PEPT2-carried substrates. Cell specificity of the PEPT2-mediated uptake pattern was confirmed by double labeling with Lycopersicon esculentum lectin. Together these data suggest that PEPT2 is the molecular basis for the transport of peptides and peptidomimetics in pulmonary epithelial cells. In conclusion PEPT2 may be an interesting target for pulmonary delivery of peptides and peptidomimetics.

Penetration of meropenem in lung, bronchial mucosa, and pleural tissues

Lung, bronchial mucosa, and pleural tissue samples were obtained from 14 patients undergoing lung surgery 1 to 5 h after administration of 1 g of meropenem. The mean (range) peak concentrations of meropenem were 3.9 (0.2 to 8.2), 6.6 (3.0 to 13.3), and 2.8 (0.6 to 7.8) mg/kg of tissue, respectively, exceeding the MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited for most respiratory pathogens.

Cefadroxil. A review of its antibacterial, pharmacokinetic and therapeutic properties in comparison with cephalexin and cephradine

Cefadroxil is an oral cephalosporin which is similar to cephalexin and cephradine in structure and spectrum of antibacterial activity, but has different pharmacokinetic properties. Not only does cefadroxil exhibit a longer serum half-life, and thus a prolonged duration of activity, but it is virtually unaffected by simultaneous food intake. The concentrations of cefadroxil attained in body tissues and fluids are also higher and more sustained than those of cephalexin and cephradine. These characteristics permit the administration of cefadroxil during meals on a once-daily or twice-daily basis, thus encouraging patient compliance which often determines the successful management of out-patient infections. Many studies have established the efficacy of the administration of once- or twice-daily cefadroxil, compared with regimens of cephalexin or cephradine given 4 times daily, in the management of infections in the respiratory tract, urinary tract, skin and soft tissues, and bones and joints.