Effect of food on enoxacin absorption

Together or Apart? Revealing the Impact of Dietary Interventions on Bioavailability of Quinolones: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Managing drug-food interactions is essential for optimizing the effectiveness and safety profile of quinolones. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the influence of dietary interventions on the bioavailability of 22 quinolones.

METHODS

All studies describing or investigating the impact of food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements on pharmacokinetic parameters or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices of orally taken quinolones were considered for inclusion. We excluded reviews, in vitro and in silico studies, studies performed on animals, and those involving alcohol. We performed the search in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library, covering reports from database inception to December 2022. We used the following tools to assess the risk of bias: version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for parallel trials, the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for cross-over studies, and the NIH quality assessment tool for before-after studies. We performed quantitative analyses for each quinolone if two or more food-effect studies with specified and comparable study designs were available. If meta-analyses were not applicable, we qualitatively summarized the results.

RESULTS

We included 109 studies from 101 reports. Meta-analyses were conducted for 12 antibiotics and qualitative synthesis was employed for the remaining drugs. Of the studies, 60.5% were open-label, cross-over, as recommended by FDA. We judged 46% of studies as having a high risk of bias and only 4% of having a low risk of bias. Among 19 quinolones with available food impact data, 14 (74%) had potentially clinically important interactions. For nalidixic acid, oxolinic acid, and tosufloxacin, food exerted a high positive impact on bioavailability (AUC or Cmax increased by > 45%), whereas, for all the remaining drugs, postprandial absorption was lower. The most significant negative influence of food (AUC or Cmax decreased by > 40%) occurred for delafloxacin capsules and norfloxacin, whereas the moderate influence (AUC or Cmax decreased by 30-40%) occurred for nemonoxacin and rufloxacin. All 14 analysed quinolones showed a substantial reduction in bioavailability when co-administered with antacids and mineral supplements, except for calcium preparations. The impact of beverages was evaluated for 10 quinolones, with 50% experiencing significantly reduced absorption in the presence of milk (the highest negative impact for ciprofloxacin). Moreover, both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin demonstrated compromised bioavailability when consumed with orange juice, particularly calcium-fortified.

DISCUSSION

Several factors may influence interactions, including the physicochemical characteristics of quinolones, the type of intervention, drug formulation, and the patient's health status. We assessed the quality of evidence as low due to the poor actuality of included studies, their methodological diversity, and uneven data availability for individual drugs.

The pH Dependent Uptake of Enoxacin by Rat Intestinal Brush-border Membrane Vesicles

The mechanism of the intestinal transport of enoxacin, an orally active fluoroquinolone antibiotic, has been investigated using brush-border membrane vesicles isolated from rat small intestine. The initial rate and time-course of enoxacin uptake were considerably dependent upon the medium pH (pH 5·5 > pH 7·5) and upon the percent ionization of the carboxyl group (pKa 6·2, anionic charge), namely, the degree of uptake of cationic form was higher than that of the zwitterionic form. There was evidence of transport into the intravesicular space as shown by the effect of extravesicular medium osmolarity on enoxacin uptake at steady state (30 min). This transport across the brush-border membrane was stimulated by the valinomycin-induced K+-diffusion potential (interior negative) and an outward H+-diffusion potential. Furthermore, changing the pH of the medium from 5·5 to 7·5 significantly decreased the effect of valinomycin-induced K+-diffusion potential on the enoxacin uptake. These results suggest that the uptake behaviour of the cationic form of enoxacin plays an important role in the intestinal absorption process of enoxacin.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Oral Dose of Moxifloxacin 400mg in Healthy Male Volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of concomitant food intake on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of moxifloxacin 400mg.

DESIGN

This was a randomised 2-way nonblinded crossover study in healthy volunteers.

PARTICIPANTS

18 young, healthy, male volunteers were enrolled in the study, of whom 16 were considered evaluable for the pharmacokinetic analysis.

METHODS

Moxifloxacin was given under 2 conditions separated by a 1-week washout period: fasted and fed (immediately after a standardised high fat breakfast). Concentrations of moxifloxacin in serum were determined by a validated high performance liquid chromatography procedure with fluorescence detection.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax), area under the concentration-time curve from zero to 48 hours (AUC48h), AUC from zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinfinity) and elimination half-life (t1/2z) were estimated using noncompartmental methods. The natural logarithms of AUC and Cmax were analysed using analysis of variance. Bioequivalence of the 2 treatments was determined at the 5% significance level with the two 1-sided tests procedure and limits of 80% and 125% for AUC and 70 to 143% for Cmax.

RESULTS

The mean serum concentration versus time profiles were similar between the 2 treatments. The geometric mean AUCinfinity values under fed and fasted conditions were almost identical, 37.7 versus 38.5 mg/L x h, respectively [90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of fed versus fasted based on geometric least-square means was 0.95, 1.00]. Geometric mean Cmax values were slightly reduced by food, 2.5 versus 2.8 mg/L, respectively (90% CI of fed versus fasted based on geometric least-square means was 0.78, 0.98). The absorption of moxifloxacin seems to be mildly delayed because of the effect of food; the median tmax values were 1.0 and 2.5 hours for fasted and fed conditions, respectively. The single oral dose of moxifloxacin 400mg was well tolerated when taken with and without food.

The effect of food on the bioavailability of oral gemifloxacin in healthy volunteers

The effect of food on the bioavailability of gemifloxacin was investigated at two doses (320 and 640 mg) in healthy male and female volunteers. A total of 21 subjects entered the open label, four-period crossover study. Each subject received single oral doses of 320 and 640 mg in the fasted state and after a high fat meal, on separate dosing occasions in a randomised fashion. There was on average, a 3% (95% CI (0.88, 1.07)) and 12% (95% CI (0.79, 0.97)) reduction in AUC and a 12% (95% CI (0.76, 1.02) and 14% (0.75, 1.00) reduction in Cmax after the 320- and 640-mg doses, respectively. The results indicate a minor effect of food on bioavailability of gemifloxacin (320 and 640 mg). Such a reduction in systemic exposure would be considered to be not clinically relevant. Tmax data were inconclusive but indicated a possible slight delay in Tmax of, on average, 0.75 and 0.21 h after the 320- and 640-mg doses, respectively. Delays of this magnitude in reaching maximum concentrations are unlikely to be of clinical importance for an antibiotic drug. Both 320 and 640 mg gemifloxacin were well tolerated in fed and fasted states by healthy volunteers. It can be concluded therefore, that gemifloxacin can be taken with and without food.

Decreased in vitro fluoroquinolone concentrations after admixture with an enteral feeding formulation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine if mixing of fluoroquinolones with a common enteral feeding formulation, Ensure (Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH), would alter the measured in vitro quinolone concentrations over a 24-hour period.

METHODS

Tablets of ciprofloxacin (500 mg), levofloxacin (500 mg), and ofloxacin (300 mg) were crushed and mixed with 240 mL of Ensure, water and calcium chloride (500 mg/L), water and magnesium chloride (200 mg/L), water and calcium chloride and magnesium chloride, and water alone. Fluoroquinolone concentrations of the mixtures were measured, via high-performance liquid chromatography, at baseline and serially over 24 hours. Experiments were performed in duplicate, at three temperatures (5 degrees C, 25 degrees C, and 37 degrees C).

RESULTS

Average decreases of 82.5% +/- 1.5% for ciprofloxacin, 61.3% +/- 5.2% for levofloxacin, and 45.7% +/- 10.1% for ofloxacin (mean +/- 95% CI) were observed in vitro for Ensure over the two experimental sets at baseline. Serial analysis revealed no further significant change in any of the quinolone concentrations over the remaining 24-hour period. No significant decrease was noted with the quinolones when mixed in water and calcium, water and magnesium, water and calcium and magnesium, or water alone. This phenomenon appears to be unaffected by time and temperature.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest there is an immediate and significant loss of fluoroquinolone when mixed with Ensure. An explanation for the loss of fluoroquinolone remains unclear.

Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin

Sparfloxacin, a fluoroquinolone with a broad antimicrobial spectrum and long elimination half-life, is indicated for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adult patients. The present study was undertaken to determine the effects of skim milk and a high-fat breakfast without milk on the single-dose pharmacokinetic characteristics of this antibiotic. The pharmacokinetics of a single 200-mg dose of sparfloxacin were assessed in a 3-way crossover study that included 23 healthy male volunteers who had fasted, had ingested 240 mL of skim milk, or had consumed a standard high-fat breakfast. The subjects' mean age and weight were 26.5 years and 73.2 kg, respectively; 17 were white, 5 Hispanic, and 1 black. Neither skim milk nor the high-fat breakfast had a statistically significant effect on sparfloxacin absorption, as reflected in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Ninety percent confidence limits for logarithmically transformed AUC from time zero to infinity and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range, demonstrating that the rate and extent of sparfloxacin absorption with skim milk or a high-fat breakfast were not different from those under fasted conditions. As indicated by an increase in the time to Cmax from 3.6 to 5.4 hours, the high-fat breakfast slightly delayed the onset of sparfloxacin absorption. Skim milk and the high-fat breakfast did not significantly affect the elimination kinetics of sparfloxacin. Sparfloxacin was well tolerated in all 3 treatment groups. Despite the apparent delay in the onset of absorption, the bioavailability of sparfloxacin in the healthy male subjects in this study population was not affected by concomitant administration with skim milk or a high-fat meal. Accordingly, the results suggest that sparfloxacin can be administered without regard to the ingestion of milk or meals.

Effects of food and sucralfate on a single oral dose of 500 milligrams of levofloxacin in healthy subjects

The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax), the time to Cmax (Tmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CLR), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (Ae) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and Cmax was slightly reduced (Tmax, 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P = 0.002]; Cmax, 5.9 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 0.9 microg/ml [90% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of Cmax and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 +/- 3.2 microg/ml and 47.9 +/- 8.4 microg x h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 +/- 1.3 microg/ml and 50.5 +/- 8.1 microg x h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t1/2, CL/F, CLR, and Ae values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.

Enoxacin: a reappraisal of its clinical efficacy in the treatment of genitourinary tract infections

Enoxacin is a 6-fluoronaphthyridinone antibacterial agent with good in vitro activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and most Gram-negative urinary tract pathogens. It is less active in vitro against Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and most Gram-positive bacteria, than against Gram-negative organisms. Enoxacin is rapidly absorbed, with a high oral bioavailability (87 to 91%). Of the absorbed dose, 44 to 56% is excreted unchanged in the urine, with peak urinary concentrations (>500 mg/L within 4 hours) remaining high (>100 mg/L) for up to 24 hours, sufficient to inhibit most urinary tract pathogens. Single (400 mg) and multiple oral dose regimens (100 to 600 mg twice or 3 times daily for 5 to 14 days) of enoxacin are as effective for the treatment of patients with complicated or uncomplicated urinary tract infections as other antibacterial agents such as amoxicillin, cefuroxime axetil, cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) or trimethoprim. Noncomparative data suggest that enoxacin is also an effective agent for the treatment of prostatitis. Single 400 mgoral doses of enoxacin produce >/- 95% bacteriological cure rates in gonococcal infections, comparable to those produced by single intramuscular doses of ceftriaxone 250 mg. Perioperative doses of oral enoxacin 200 mg provide effective prophylaxis against postoperative bacteriuria after transurethral resection of the prostate. Concomitant administration of enoxacin with a number of commonly used therapeutic agents (e.g. antacids, methylxanthines, warfarin) affects the pharmacokinetic properties of either enoxacin or the coadministered agents. Enoxacin is reasonably well tolerated, with the incidence of adverse experiences ranging from 0 to 24%. Adverse events are mainly gastrointestinal, neurological or dermatological and resolve with minimal intervention. Overall, although enoxacin exhibits a number of clinical characteristics that are similar to those of other agents for the treatment of genitourinary tract infections, the advantages offered by this agent generally do not outweigh those of alternative fluoroquinolone agents. Thus, it is likely to prove to be yet another addition to the list of agents available for the management of these infections.

Effects of traditional Chinese medicines on pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin

The effects of single coadministrations of one of three traditional Chinese medicines, Hotyu-ekki-to, Rikkunshi-to, and Juzen-taiho-to, on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin (LVFX) were investigated with eight healthy volunteers in an open, random crossover fashion. Subjects each received a single oral dose of LVFX (200 mg) alone and then with a single coadministration of each Chinese medicine. There were no significant differences in any pharmacokinetic parameters of LVFX between the groups. Also, no significant changes in the urinary recovery (> 80%) and renal clearance of LVFX were observed. These results indicate that the Chinese medicines tested have no significant effect on the rate and extent of bioavailability or renal excretion of LVFX.

Absorption interactions with fluoroquinolones. 1995 update

The utility of the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics is rapidly expanding due to their favourable pharmacokinetic profile and the continuing development of new compounds. These agents are often used for indications not successfully treated with other orally available antimicrobials in the past, or for 'step-down' therapy in patients originally treated with intravenous agents. As the usage of these agents expands for serious systemic infections, knowledge of absorptive interactions with fluoroquinolones becomes paramount. Fluoroquinolones are often utilised in dosages and against modestly susceptible pathogens which allow a narrow margin for acceptable decreases in bioavailability. Chelation interactions with multivalent cations can result in inactivation of the fluoroquinolone with ramifications in vitro and in vivo. Chelation interactions have been reported to occur in between 22 and 76% of patients prescribed fluoroquinolones. Concurrent administration of magnesium-aluminum antacids and sucralfate has the greatest effect on the bioavailability of quinolones followed by iron, calcium and zinc. Spacing doses of fluoroquinolones and interactants has been suggested as a method of ensuring adequate quinolone absorption, but this can make optimal administration of the cation interactant difficult, if not impossible.

Effects of milk and food on the absorption of enoxacin

The effects of milk and a standard breakfast on the oral absorption of enoxacin were evaluated in eight healthy volunteers in a randomized, balanced, four-way crossover study. After an overnight fast, 400 mg enoxacin was given with water, milk, a breakfast or with a breakfast and milk. The extent of enoxacin absorption was not affected by any of the three treatments, and no statistically significant changes were found with respect to peak plasma enoxacin concentration or time to peak. We conclude that enoxacin can be taken together with food and dairy products.

Effect of enteral feeding with ensure on oral bioavailabilities of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin

The relative oral bioavailabilities of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin when they were coadministered with water or an enteral feeding product (Ensure) were assessed in 13 healthy volunteers. The area under the concentration time curve from time zero to infinity and the maximum concentration of drug in serum for both drugs were reduced by Ensure in comparison with those by water (P < 0.01). However, Ensure reduced the percent relative bioavailability of ciprofloxacin (72% +/- 14%; range, 52 to 96%) significantly more than ofloxacin (90% +/- 8.3%; range, 74 to 105%) (P < 0.005). Coadministration of Ensure significantly diminished ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin absorption, but ciprofloxacin absorption was reduced significantly more than ofloxacin absorption.

Effect of a fat- and calcium-rich breakfast on pharmacokinetics of fleroxacin administered in single and multiple doses

The effect of a fat- and liquid-calcium-rich meal on the pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of fleroxacin in 20 healthy men and women was investigated in a randomized crossover fashion. Fleroxacin was administered as 400 mg daily for 3 days and as a single 400 mg dose. Concurrent administration of fleroxacin with food resulted in a statistically significant (P < or = 0.05) decrease in the area under the curve (13.9% for multiple-dose administration, 10% for single-dose administration) and in the peak concentration (25.9% for multiple-dose administration, 27% for single-dose administration) and a lengthening of the time to peak (more than doubled for single- and multiple-dose phases). In addition, by using an equivalence criteria of 80 to 125%, the two one-sided tests procedure indicated that the mean areas under the curves for fleroxacin administered in a fed and a fasted state were statistically bioequivalent (P < or = 0.05) for both the single- and multiple-dose regimens. Although a meal high in fat and containing liquid calcium reduces the peak concentration by approximately 25%, a minimal effect on bioavailability is seen with concomitant food administration. In addition, multiple-dose bioavailability studies appear to give similar information to single-dose studies while representing the clinical setting more closely.

Fluoroquinolones: interaction profile during enteral absorption

Fluoroquinolones are used worldwide in the treatment of severe infections. These drugs, however, can interact with other agents. This paper is a review of drug interactions with different quinolone derivatives at the absorption phase; the review deals mainly with the prototype quinolones, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, and also with some of the newer agents. The concomitant agents considered are food, H2-receptor antagonists, anticholinergic drugs and metallic cation-containing compounds. Food (standard breakfast), H2-receptor antagonists and anticholinergic drugs had no major effect on the bioavailability of the quinolones. However, antacids, ferrous sulfate and other metallic cation-containing compounds impaired the bioavailability of the quinolones. This effect is due to chelation between the functional groups of the quinolone molecule and the metallic cations, resulting in insoluble complexes that can be absorbed. The degree of impairment varied between different quinolone derivatives.

The effect of food on the bioavailability of temafloxacin. A review of 3 studies

Temafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. Previous pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the extent of absorption of temafloxacin is independent of dose and that the dispositional pharmacokinetics are linear. The pharmacokinetics of 3 tablet formulations of temafloxacin were investigated in phase I studies in healthy adult volunteers, to determine whether the bioavailability is altered by the presence of food. Results of these studies indicate that the absorption of temafloxacin is slightly enhanced by concomitant administration of food. Thus, special coordination of temafloxacin administration and meals appears to be unnecessary.

The effect of food or milk on the absorption kinetics of ofloxacin

We have studied the effects of food or milk on the absorption of ofloxacin in 21 healthy male volunteers in a three-way crossover design. Milk did not alter the rate or extent of absorption of ofloxacin or its elimination. Food altered the onset and/or rate of absorption, but not the extent of absorption or the elimination rate. Thus, food reduced peak ofloxacin concentrations (Cmax) by 20% compared with fasting conditions and the time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) was prolonged on average by 1 h. However, the extent of absorption and the half-life (t 1/2) of ofloxacin were the same after each treatment. These data indicate that food and milk have a clinically insignificant effect on ofloxacin absorption.

Effect of food on absorption of lomefloxacin

Twelve subjects participated in an open-label, single-dose, balanced three-way crossover study in which the absorptions of lomefloxacin were compared following (i) an overnight fast, (ii) a carbohydrate meal, and (iii) a high-fat meal. The time to peak concentration of lomefloxacin was delayed, but peak concentration in plasma and amount of drug absorbed were unchanged following both meals.

Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents

The fluoroquinolones, a new class of potent orally absorbed antimicrobial agents, are reviewed, considering structure, mechanisms of action and resistance, spectrum, variables affecting activity in vitro, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, emergence of resistance, and tolerability. The primary bacterial target is the enzyme deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase. Bacterial resistance occurs by chromosomal mutations altering deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase and decreasing drug permeation. The drugs are bactericidal and potent in vitro against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Haemophilus spp., and Neisseria spp., have good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococci, and (with several exceptions) are less potent against streptococci and have fair to poor activity against anaerobic species. Potency in vitro decreases in the presence of low pH, magnesium ions, or urine but is little affected by different media, increased inoculum, or serum. The effects of the drugs in combination with a beta-lactam or aminoglycoside are often additive, occasionally synergistic, and rarely antagonistic. The agents are orally absorbed, require at most twice-daily dosing, and achieve high concentrations in urine, feces, and kidney and good concentrations in lung, bone, prostate, and other tissues. The drugs are efficacious in treatment of a variety of bacterial infections, including uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections, bacterial gastroenteritis, and gonorrhea, and show promise for therapy of prostatitis, respiratory tract infections, osteomyelitis, and cutaneous infections, particularly when caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli. Fluoroquinolones have also proved to be efficacious for prophylaxis against travelers' diarrhea and infection with gram-negative bacilli in neutropenic patients. The drugs are effective in eliminating carriage of Neisseria meningitidis. Patient tolerability appears acceptable, with gastrointestinal or central nervous system toxicities occurring most commonly, but only rarely necessitating discontinuance of therapy. In 17 of 18 prospective, randomized, double-blind comparisons with another agent or placebo, fluoroquinolones were tolerated as well as or better than the comparison regimen. Bacterial resistance has been uncommonly documented but occurs, most notably with P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus and occasionally other species for which the therapeutic ratio is less favorable. Fluoroquinolones offer an efficacious, well-tolerated, and cost-effective alternative to parenteral therapies of selected infections.

Inhibition of enoxacin absorption by antacids or ranitidine

Ten normal volunteers participated in a randomized, five-way crossover study to determine the effect of concurrent enoxacin and antacid or ranitidine administration on enoxacin absorption. The bioavailability of a single oral 400-mg enoxacin dose was significantly decreased, by 73 and 49%, when Maalox TC was administered 0.5 and 2 h before enoxacin, respectively. Enoxacin bioavailability was not significantly altered when the antacid was given 8 h before or 2 h after enoxacin administration. Ranitidine, administered intravenously 2 h before enoxacin, also significantly decreased enoxacin bioavailability, by 40%. The correlation between the proximity of antacid administration and the magnitude of the decrease in enoxacin bioavailability supports complexation as the mechanism of the antacid-enoxacin interaction. However, reduction of enoxacin bioavailability by ranitidine suggests that elevated gastric pH may also play a role in the antacid-enoxacin drug-drug interaction.

Enoxacin absorption and elimination characteristics

Enoxacin, a new fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is rapidly and extensively absorbed after oral administration and has a bioavailability independent of dose and only slightly delayed by concurrent food. Plasma concentrations are similar for both intravenous and oral administration. The t1/2 for enoxacin ranges from 4 to 6 hours, which allows effective twice-daily administration without significant accumulation. Plasma enoxacin concentrations may be slightly higher in elderly subjects, but this change does not necessitate dosage adjustment in older patients with adequate renal function. Enoxacin and ciprofloxacin decrease the clearance of coadministered theophylline, whereas ofloxacin does not appear to greatly alter methylxanthine clearance. Maalox (a magnesium-aluminium hydroxide antacid) significantly decreases the oral bioavailability of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and enoxacin, and use of these agents with antacids should be avoided. Enoxacin is a highly effective oral anti-infective agent with excellent bioavailability characteristics, a relatively slow rate of elimination and simple, well-defined requirements for dosage modification in patients with renal dysfunction.

The 4-quinolone antibiotics: past, present, and future

During the past 5 years the 4-quinolone antibiotics have progressed from relative obscurity to a highly visible and intensely studied class of compounds. The zeal for developing and marketing newer fluoroquinolones closely parallels that of the cephalosporins for the last 10 years. All of these newer agents appear to have similar mechanisms of action, but numerous derivatives of the basic 4-quinolone structure have been synthesized in an effort to enhance the antimicrobial spectrum and pharmacologic properties of these antibiotics.

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Microbiology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use

The newer fluoroquinolones are a major advance in antimicrobial chemotherapy. They inhibit the supercoiling activity of the DNA gyrase enzyme, thus exerting their antibacterial action on DNA and RNA synthesis, resulting in a biphasic response and killing of susceptible organisms. The newer fluoroquinolones have an extended antimicrobial spectrum compared to their older congeners, and are highly active against most Gram-negative pathogens including the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. While Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci are usually susceptible to the fluoroquinolones, streptococci are generally more resistant and enterococci are resistant. All of the newer fluoroquinolones may be administered orally and most of them have been administered parenterally. They are widely distributed in the body, attaining therapeutic concentrations in most tissues. All of the fluoroquinolones have long half-lives and may be administered once or twice daily. The fluoroquinolones have proved effective in many infections, including uncomplicated or complicated urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections, gonorrhoea, bacterial gastroenteritis, and soft tissue infections due to Gram-negative organisms. In general, success has been notable in the management of Gram-negative infections but less so with Gram-positive infections. Resistance has occurred and is proving a problem with P. aeruginosa in some cystic fibrosis patients, but as yet no plasmid-mediated resistance has developed. Cross-resistance occurs between the quinolones but only rarely with other classes of antibacterial drugs. The fluoroquinolones have an excellent safety record and their adverse effects, which include hypersensitivity reactions, dizziness, headache, gastrointestinal disturbance and minor haematological abnormalities are usually mild and transient. However, the fluoroquinolones have been found to damage juvenile weight-bearing joints in animals and are therefore only to be used with caution in children; transient arthralgia has been reported in a cystic fibrotic teenager on long term ciprofloxacin therapy. All of the fluoroquinolones except ofloxacin are associated with a variable increase in the serum concentration of theophylline, warfarin and caffeine. Thus, the fluoroquinolones are an attractive option in the management of many infections. Cost and possible resistance, however, should counsel caution in their use, and may limit them to situations where a cheaper antimicrobial of equivalent efficacy is not available.

The absorption and disposition of enoxacin in healthy subjects

Enoxacin is a new orally active, synthetic broad-spectrum antibacterial drug of the fluorinated quinolone class. The pharmacokinetics and renal handling of this drug have not been thoroughly investigated, in particular, with specific analytical methodology. Sixteen healthy, young subjects received a single 400-mg oral dose of enoxacin after an overnight fast and multiple blood samples and all urine were collected for 33 hours. Enoxacin in plasma and urine and oxo-enoxacin in urine were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Enoxacin was absorbed rapidly, with tmax values ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 hours. The variability in the AUC values of 35% was reduced to 23% when variations in body weight were taken into consideration. The terminal half-life ranged from 4.2 to 6.8 hours and the unbound fraction in plasma was 0.33 +/- 0.07. In urine, 44 +/- 9% of the dose was recovered as unchanged enoxacin and 5.4 +/- 3.9% as oxo-enoxacin; there was no evidence of conjugates of enoxacin in urine. Renal clearance of enoxacin was 230 +/- 92 mL/min, with 17 +/- 8% of this being due to glomerular filtration and 83 +/- 8% being due to tubular secretion. These data indicate that the major potential drug interactions affecting enoxacin disposition are likely with drugs competing for renal proximal tubular secretion and hepatic elimination. These conclusions regarding enoxacin are likely to be applicable to the fluorinated quinolones in general.

Enoxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Enoxacin is a new addition to the class of 4-quinolone antibacterial drugs. It has a broad spectrum of in vitro antibacterial activity, and is particularly potent against Gram-negative organisms and staphylococci. The pharmacokinetic profile of enoxacin is similar to that of ofloxacin, achieving higher plasma and tissue concentrations and possessing a longer half-life than norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin. In comparative studies, clinical and/or bacteriological efficacy was comparable or (in studies which statistically analysed the results) not significantly different between enoxacin and amoxycillin in acute cystitis, acute Gram-negative exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute or chronic otitis media, between enoxacin and cephalexin in skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections, between enoxacin and trimethoprim in acute cystitis, between enoxacin and co-trimoxazole in complicated urinary tract infection and between enoxacin and pipemidic acid in suppurative otitis media. Significantly (p less than 0.01) more clinical and/or bacteriological cures were effected by enoxacin than pipemidic acid in acute cystitis and complicated urinary tract infection. In uncomplicated gonococcal infections single oral doses of enoxacin were effective in over 90% of patients. Enoxacin is a well-tolerated, orally active broad spectrum antibacterial drug which should prove a worthwhile alternative to currently available antibacterial therapy.