Efficacy of teicoplanin in two dosage regimens for experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin

Efficacy of teicoplanin monotherapy following initial standard therapy in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Teicoplanin is often used in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis as a relay in case of penicillin side effects, or in outpatients. We assessed the efficacy of teicoplanin used as continuation therapy after initial standard treatment of E. faecalis endocarditis.

METHODS

All adult patients consecutively diagnosed between 1997 and 2016 for E. faecalis endocarditis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received standard therapy (ST) were compared to those switched to teicoplanin to complete the treatment (teicoplanin therapy, TT).

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were enrolled: 34 in the ST group and 37 in the TT group. Amoxicillin was replaced by teicoplanin after a median duration of 18 days (IQ_25 - 75 12-21). Teicoplanin (5.8 ± 2.3 mg/kg) was administered for a median duration of 29 days (IQ_25 - 75 25-34). Gentamicin therapy was similar. Overall duration of antimicrobial therapy was 42 days (IQ_25 - 75 35-43) in the ST group, and 46 days (IQ_25 - 75 43-49) in the TT group (p = 0.001). Global and endocarditis-related mortality rates were 22/34 (65%) and 13/34 (38%) in the ST group, and 14/37 (38%) and 3/37 (8%) in the TT group (p ≤ 0.05). Relapses occurred in 2/26 patients who survived the treatment phase in the ST group (8%) and in 3/37 in the TT group (8%, p = 0.68). All relapses in the TT group occurred in patients presenting prosthetic valve endocarditis. Finally, 20 patients were cured in the ST group (59%), and 33 patients in the TT group (89%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In E. faecalis endocarditis, the switch to teicoplanin in selected patients following an initial phase of standard treatment represents an alternative, particularly for outpatient therapy. Caution should be exercised in cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Teicoplanin for treating enterococcal infective endocarditis: A retrospective observational study from a referral centre in Spain

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of teicoplanin for treating enterococcal infective endocarditis (EIE). A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of definite EIE patients treated with teicoplanin in a Spanish referral centre (2000-2017) was performed. The primary outcome was mortality during treatment. Secondary outcomes were mortality during 3-month follow-up, adverse effects and relapse. A total of 22 patients received teicoplanin, 9 (40.9%) as first-line (8 Enterococcus faecium and 1 Enterococcus faecalis) and 13 (59.1%) as salvage therapy (13 E. faecalis). Median (IQR) age was 71.5 (58.3-78) years and Charlson comorbidity index was 4.5 (3-7). Five (22.7%) affected prosthetic valves. Median duration of treatment in survivors was 53 (42.5-61) days for antibiotics and 27 (17-41.5) days for teicoplanin [median dose 10 (10-10.8) mg/kg/day]. Reasons for teicoplanin use were resistance to β-lactams (40.9%), adverse events with previous regimens (31.8%) and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) (27.3%). Teicoplanin was withdrawn due to adverse events in 2 patients (9.1%). Five patients (22.7%) died during treatment: four in the first-line (three with surgery indicated but not performed) and one in the salvage therapy group (surgery indicated but not performed). Two deaths (11.8%) occurred over the 3-month follow-up. There were no relapses during a median of 43.2 (22.1-69.1) months. Teicoplanin can be used as an alternative treatment for susceptible E. faecium IE and as a salvage therapy in selected patients with E. faecalis IE when adverse events develop with standard regimens or to allow OPAT.

Efficacy of teicoplanin, administered in two different regimens, in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis

Using a rabbit model of endocarditis, we studied the efficacy of teicoplanin against a strain of Enterococcus faecalis resistant to ampicillin. Rabbits were randomly assigned to receive no antibiotics, teicoplanin 12 or 18 mg/kg of body weight every 12h, for 9 days. The effect of treatment on bacterial counts of vegetations and survival of the animals was evaluated at the end of treatment and 10 days thereafter. The two treatment regimens of teicoplanin produced peak serum levels 18.51+/-1.84 and 34.66+/-4.19 microg/ml, and trough levels above 10 x MIC of teicoplanin for the infecting organism. Both regimens resulted in significant bacterial reduction in the vegetations as compared to the control group (p<0.001). The drug prevented relapse of the infection 10 days after discontinuation of treatment. By increasing the teicoplanin dosage no additional therapeutic benefit was observed in terms of bacterial killing, sterilization of the vegetations, and survival of the animals, although the higher doses gave numerically superior results. These findings may have meaning for the optimum use of teicoplanin in the treatment of enterococcal endocarditis.

Efficacy of daptomycin in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is becoming increasingly prevalent as both a nosocomial and a community-acquired pathogen. Daptomycin, a lipopeptide antibiotic now in phase III clinical trials, is rapidly bactericidal in vitro against a range of gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). In this study, we compared the efficacy of daptomycin with that of vancomycin, each with or without rifampin, in a model of experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to MRSA. The infecting strain (MRSA strain 32) was susceptible to daptomycin (MIC = 1 micro g/ml), vancomycin (MIC = 0.5 micro g/ml), and rifampin (MIC = 0.5 micro g/ml). Daptomycin was administered at 25 or 40 mg/kg q24h (q24h) by subcutaneous injection in an attempt to simulate human doses of 4 and 6 mg/kg q24h, respectively. Vancomycin was given at 150 mg/kg q24h by continuous intravenous infusion. Rifampin was given at 25 mg/kg by intramuscular injection q24h. Treatment was started 6 h postinoculation and continued for 4.5 days. Outcome was assessed by counting the residual viable bacteria in vegetations. The mean peak daptomycin levels in serum at 2 h after subcutaneous administration of 25 and 40 mg/kg were 64 and 91 micro g/ml, respectively. Daptomycin was undetectable in serum at 24 h. The total exposure was comparable to that achieved clinically in humans receiving the drug. Bacterial counts (mean log(10) number of CFU per gram +/- the standard deviation) in untreated controls reached 10.6 +/- 0.8. In treated rats, bacterial counts were as follows: vancomycin, 7.1 +/- 2.5; daptomycin at 25 mg/kg, 5.5 +/- 1.7; daptomycin at 40 mg/kg, 4.2 +/- 1.5. The difference between daptomycin at 40 mg/kg and vancomycin at 150 mg/kg was statistically significant (P = 0.004). In the study of combination therapy, vegetation bacterial counts were as follows: daptomycin at 40 mg/kg, 4.6 +/- 1.6; rifampin, 3.6 +/- 1.3; vancomycin plus rifampin, 3.3 +/- 1.1; daptomycin plus rifampin, 2.9 +/- 0.8. The difference between daptomycin and daptomycin plus rifampin was statistically significant (P = 0.006). These results support the continued evaluation of daptomycin for serious MRSA infections, including infective endocarditis.

In vivo activity of evernimicin (SCH 27899) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental infective endocarditis

Currently, there exist few satisfactory alternatives to vancomycin for therapy of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We employed a rat model of aortic valve endocarditis to assess the potential efficacy of evernimicin (SCH 27899) compared with vancomycin against infection with a strain susceptible to both agents (MICs of 0.25 and 0.50 microg/ml, respectively). Infected animals were assigned to one of three groups: controls (no treatment), evernimicin at 60 mg/kg of body weight by intravenous (i.v.) infusion once daily, or vancomycin at 150 mg/kg of body weight per day by continuous i.v. infusion. Therapy was administered for 5.5 days. At the start of therapy, colony counts in vegetations were 6.63 +/- 0.44 log(10) CFU/g. In both treatment groups, bacterial density within vegetations was significantly reduced in comparison with control animals that had not been treated. Final colony counts were as follows (mean +/- standard deviation): controls, 10.12 +/- 1.51 log(10) CFU/g of vegetation; evernimicin, 7.22 +/- 2.91 log(10) CFU/g of vegetation; vancomycin, 5.65 +/- 1.76 log(10) CFU/g of vegetation. The difference between the evernimicin and vancomycin groups was not significant. These results confirmed the bacteriostatic activity of evernimicin in vivo in an experimental model of severe MRSA infection.

Antienterococcal antibiotics

The treatment of severe enterococcal infections based on the currently available antibacterial agents is difficult. The help of the microbiology laboratory for determining MICs, MBCs, and most effective synergistic combinations is crucial. There is a need for good prospective multicenter clinical trials to improve the prognosis of such infections by defining therapeutic strategies better. Such a requirement is highly suitable for the treatment of infections caused by enterococci exhibiting acquired resistance mechanisms to the available agents. The current clinical development of new compounds looks promising in these persistently life-threatening infections mostly occurring in deficient hosts.

In vivo activities of evernimicin (SCH 27899) against vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in experimental endocarditis

To assess the potential efficacy of evernimicin (SCH 27899) against serious enterococcal infections, we used a rat model of aortic valve endocarditis established with either a vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis or a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain. Animals infected with either one of the test strains were assigned to receive no treatment (controls) or 5-day therapy with one of the following regimens: evernimicin 60-mg/kg of body weight intravenous (i.v.) bolus once daily, 60-mg/kg i.v. bolus twice daily (b.i.d.), 60 mg/kg/day i.v. by continuous infusion, or 120 mg/kg/day i.v. by continuous infusion. These regimens were compared with vancomycin at 150 mg/kg/day. In animals infected with E. faecalis, evernimicin at 120 mg/kg/day by continuous infusion significantly reduced bacterial counts in vegetations (final density, 5.75+/-3.38 log(10) CFU/g) compared with controls (8.51+/-1.11 log(10) CFU/g). In animals infected with 0.5 ml of an 8 x 10(7)-CFU/ml inoculum of the vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, both 60-mg/kg bolus once a day and b.i.d. dose regimens of evernimicin were very effective (viable counts, 3.45+/-1.44 and 3.81+/-1.98 log(10) CFU/g, respectively). Vancomycin was unexpectedly active against infections induced with that inoculum. In animals infected with a 10(9)-CFU/ml inoculum of the vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, the evernimicin 60-mg/kg i.v. bolus b.i.d. reduced viable counts in vegetations compared with controls (6.27+/-1.63 versus 8.34+/-0.91 log(10) CFU/g; P<0.05), whereas vancomycin was ineffective. Although resistant colonies could be selected in vitro, we were not able to identify evernimicin-resistant clones from cardiac vegetations. An unexplained observation from these experiments was the great variability in final bacterial densities within cardiac vegetations from animals in each of the evernimicin treatment groups.

Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance

In the last 5 years, clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria with intrinsic or acquired resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics have been encountered increasingly. In many of these isolates, resistance arises from an alteration of the antibiotic target site, with the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine moiety of peptidoglycan precursors being replaced by groups that do not bind glycopeptides. Although the criteria for defining resistance have been revised frequently, the reliable detection of low-level glycopeptide resistance remains problematic and is influenced by the method chosen. Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci have emerged as a particular problem in hospitals, where in addition to sporadic cases, clusters of infections with evidence of interpatient spread have occurred. Studies using molecular typing methods have implicated colonization of patients, staff carriage, and environmental contamination in the dissemination of these bacteria. Choice of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant bacteria may be complicated by resistance to other antibiotics. Severe therapeutic difficulties are being encountered among patients infected with enterococci, with some infections being untreatable with currently available antibiotics.

Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy

Since an earlier review in the Journal substantial additional data have accumulated, further clarifying the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic profile, clinical efficacy and tolerability of teicoplanin. Recent therapeutic trials confirm the efficacy of teicoplanin in the treatment of microbiologically confirmed Gram-positive infections, including septicaemia, endocarditis, and infections of skin and soft tissue, bone and joints, and the lower respiratory tract. As teicoplanin can be administered once daily intramuscularly as well as intravenously, it has potential for outpatient treatment of severe Gram-positive infections. Teicoplanin is appropriate as treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia, but there is still controversy over the timing for introduction of glycopeptide antibiotics into therapeutic regimens. Teicoplanin is generally reserved for secondary therapy of patients with documented bacteraemia who fail to respond to initial empirical antibiotic regimens, but probably should be part of the initial empirical regimen in the setting of a high incidence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Teicoplanin has a lower propensity than vancomycin to impair renal function when either drug is combined with an aminoglycoside, causes fewer anaphylactoid reactions, and appears to be of comparable efficacy. Thus, teicoplanin may be preferred to vancomycin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections, and where a glycopeptide antibiotic is deemed a necessary inclusion in a regimen for empirical treatment in patients with fever and neutropenia.

In vitro evaluation of high-level, gentamicin-resistant enterococci isolated from bacteremic patients

We attempted to characterize the susceptibility of high-level, gentamicin-resistant (HLGR, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] > 2000 micrograms/ml) enterococcal blood isolates and evaluated a small subset of these isolates for bactericidal synergy. Thirteen Enterococcus faecalis and three Enterococcus faecium isolates that were HLGR were prospectively collected. Standard broth macrodilution techniques were used to determine the MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations to a variety of antibiotics. Two isolates were evaluated for synergy by time-kill curve methods using combinations of penicillin and streptomycin, teicoplanin and rifampin, and vancomycin and ciprofloxacin. Teicoplanin was the most active antibiotic tested, with all isolates exhibiting susceptibility to this agent. Four E. faecalis isolates and one E. faecium isolate expressed only low-level resistance to streptomycin (LLSR, MICs 32-64 micrograms/ml). Penicillin and streptomycin produced bactericidal synergy in the LLSR isolate. The other antibiotic combinations did not result in bactericidal synergy in the two isolates tested. For HLGR enterococci that are only LLSR, the combination of penicillin-streptomycin appears to provide adequate bactericidal activity. Teicoplanin may potentially be useful for streptomycin-resistant HLGR isolates.

Enterococcus, an emerging pathogen

OBJECTIVE

To review the bacterial genus Enterococcus with respect to its epidemiology, specific infections in humans, mechanisms of resistance and tolerance, and antimicrobial treatment.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search of English-language journal articles published from 1977 to 1992 was completed. Articles published prior to 1977 were identified through Index Medicus and from references appearing in the bibliographies of other journal articles. Information also was acquired from abstracts, personal communication with infectious disease specialists with active research in the area of enterococcal infection, and conference proceedings.

STUDY SELECTION

In vitro data; animal models of enterococcal infection; case reports; and case-controlled, cohort, and randomized controlled trials in humans were evaluated for relevant information.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were evaluated by their methodologic strength (e.g., randomized controlled trial), reporting of clinically relevant outcomes (e.g., clinical response to antimicrobial therapy), statistical analyses, and accountability of all patients who entered the study.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The incidence of enterococcal infections has increased in recent years and enterococci are now the second most frequently reported nosocomial pathogens. Enterococcus faecalis is the pathogen responsible for most enterococcal infections seen today; it has been implicated as an important cause of endocarditis, bacteremia, urinary tract infections, and intraabdominal infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Enterococcal infection is of particular concern clinically because of its resistance to several antibiotics. Controlled comparative clinical trials of antimicrobial therapy in humans are lacking for several enterococcal infections. Therefore, the recommendations for antimicrobial therapy presented in this review are guidelines that reflect our current understanding of antibiotics used for enterococcal infection.

Comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam with vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecalis

Increasing antibiotic resistance in the enterococci, including the capacity for beta-lactamase production and the development of high-level aminoglycoside resistance, has complicated the treatment of serious enterococcal infections, which often require synergistic antibiotic combinations for cure. We utilized the rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis to investigate the effects of various antibiotics, alone and in combination, against a multiply antibiotic-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecalis. Female New Zealand White rabbits were infected with either a beta-lactamase-producing, gentamicin-resistant isolate of E. faecalis or a non-beta-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-susceptible isolate, and the mean log10 CFU per gram of vegetation were determined. The most active agents were low-dose ampicillin-sulbactam (200 mg/kg of body weight per day), high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam (400 mg/kg of body weight per day), and vancomycin (150 mg/kg of body weight per day), which reduced the titers of bacteria by 2.27, 2.76, and 2.85 log10 (CFU/g, respectively, compared with controls. While ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin were equally efficacious in reducing titers of bacteria in vegetations, no animals were cured (defined as < 2 log10 CFU/g of vegetation) by either agent, whether treatment was continued for 3 or 7 days. The addition of gentamicin was not associated with increased killing in rabbits infected with the aminoglycoside-resistant isolate. Both high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin regimens demonstrated significant, continued reduction in bacterial titers with the longer periods of treatment (P < or = 0.05); 7-day treatment with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam produced a greater reduction in bacterial titers in vegetation than 7-day treatment with vancomycin (P < or = 0.05). We conclude that ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin are equally effective in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant E. faecalis. The optimum therapy for such infections in humans is not known.

Double-blind comparison of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in febrile neutropenic patients receiving concomitant tobramycin and piperacillin: effect on cyclosporin A-associated nephrotoxicity

A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study comparing teicoplanin with vancomycin in the initial management of febrile neutropenic patients was conducted. Teicoplanin was administered at 6 mg per kg of body weight every 24 h (q24h) intravenously (i.v.) after initial loading at 6 mg/kg q12h for three doses. Vancomycin was administered at 15 mg/kg q12h i.v. Patients also received piperacillin (3 g q4h i.v.) and tobramycin (1.5 to 2.0 mg/kg q8h i.v.). Of 53 patients enrolled, 50 were judged to be evaluable. Among these, 25 received teicoplanin and 25 received vancomycin. At enrollment, both groups were comparable in age, sex, renal function, underlying hematologic condition, and concurrent therapy. Both groups had similar sites of infection and microbial pathogens. Empirical antimicrobial therapy resulted in the cure of or improvement in 23 (92%) teicoplanin patients and 21 (84%) vancomycin patients (P = 0.67). Failures occurred with two vancomycin patients but no teicoplanin patients. Clinical response was indeterminate for two patients in each group. Adverse reactions occurred significantly more often in the vancomycin group than in the teicoplanin group (P = 0.01), and these reactions required the termination of the study regimens of 6 vancomycin versus 0 teicoplanin patients (P = 0.02). Nephrotoxicity was observed more frequently in the vancomycin group (10 versus 2 patients; P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant deterioration of renal function when vancomycin and cyclosporin A, but not teicoplanin and cyclosporin A, were used concurrently (P = 0.02). Among patients who received vancomycin and amphotericin B or teicoplanin and amphotericin B concurrently, deterioration in renal function was equivalent in both groups. Teicoplanin in the dosage employed was tolerated better than vancomycin in the empirical treatment of fever and neutropenia in our patient population.

Influence of low-level resistance to vancomycin on efficacy of teicoplanin and vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecium

Emergence of vancomycin-resistant strains among enterococci raises a new clinical challenge. Rabbits with aortic endocarditis were infected with Enterococcus faecium BM4172, a clinical strain resistant to low levels of vancomycin (MIC, 16 micrograms/ml) and susceptible to teicoplanin (MIC, 1 micrograms/ml), and against its susceptible variant E. faecium BM4172S obtained in vitro by insertional mutagenesis (MICs, 2 and 0.5 micrograms/ml, respectively). Control animals retained 8 to 10.5 log10 CFU/g of vegetation. We evaluated in this model the efficacy of vancomycin (30 mg/kg of body weight; mean peak and trough serum levels, 27 and 5 micrograms/ml, respectively), teicoplanin (standard dose, 10 mg/kg; mean peak and trough levels, 23 and 9 micrograms/ml, respectively; and high dose, 20 mg/kg; mean peak and trough levels, 63 and 25 micrograms/ml, respectively), gentamicin (6 mg/kg; mean peak and trough levels, 8.6 and less than 0.1 micrograms/ml, respectively), alone or in combination, given every 12 h intramuscularly for 5 days. Teicoplanin standard dose was as active as vancomycin against both strains. Vancomycin was not effective against E. faecium BM4172 but was highly effective against E. faecium BM4172S (7.5 +/- 1.1 log10 CFU/g of vegetation versus 4.9 +/- 1.0 log10 CFU/g of vegetation for vancomycin against E. faecium BM4172 and E. faecium BM4172S, respectively; P = 0.0012). A high dose of teicoplanin was more effective than vancomycin against E. faecium BM4172 (4.4 +/- 1.8 log10 CFU/g of vegetation versus 7.5 +/- 1.1 log10 CFU/g of vegetation for teicoplanin high dose and vancomycin, respectively; P less than 0.05). Against E. faecium BM4172 glycopeptide-gentamicin combinations were the most effective regimens in vitro and in vivo (2.8 +/- 0.7 and 3.5 +/- 1.3 log10 CFU/g of vegetation for vancomycin plus gentamicin and teicoplanin standard dose plus gentamicin, respectively; P < 0.05 versus single-drug regimens). We concluded that high-dose teicoplanin or the combination of a glycopeptide antibiotic plus gentamicin was effective against experimental infection due to E. faecium with low-level resistance to vancomycin.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of beta-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecalis

beta-Lactamase-producing (BL+), aminoglycoside-resistant (AR) Enterococcus faecalis is endemic in our hospital, having caused widespread colonization and infection. Suitable therapy for infections caused by these organisms has been problematic. We compared the antimicrobial and bactericidal activities, by broth macrodilution and time-kill methods, of several antibiotics, alone and in combination, against BL+, AR isolates of E. faecalis and determined the transmissibility of antibiotic resistance markers. Ampicillin-sulbactam, imipenem, daptomycin, and ciprofloxacin were the most active antibiotics with MICs for 90% of isolates tested of 2, 1, 2, and 1 microgram/ml, respectively, against inocula of 10(3) and 10(5) CFU/ml. Little inoculum effect was noted with imipenem, vancomycin, daptomycin, or ciprofloxacin, while the addition of sulbactam to ampicillin partially inhibited the effect of the increased inoculum. Penicillin-sulbactam and ampicillin-sulbactam combinations in a 2:1 ratio were most frequently bactericidal (greater than or equal to 3-log10-unit decrease in bacterial titers at 24 h for 13 of 20 isolates), followed by daptomycin (8 of 20 isolates) and ciprofloxacin (2 of 20 isolates). Bactericidal activity was not demonstrated for imipenem or teicoplanin. beta-Lactamase production and aminoglycoside resistance were associated with a 60- to 65-MDa plasmid which was easily transferred to a plasmid-free E. faecalis recipient. The 840-bp beta-lactamase gene probe hybridized to purified plasmid DNA from BL+ donor isolates of E. faecalis and transconjugants but not from BL- isolates. Ampicillin-sulbactam and daptomycin (an investigational antibiotic) seem to be reasonable choices for the empiric therapy of presumed enterococcal infections in hospitals in which BL+, AR E. faecalis strains are isolated. Their use should ideally be supported by tests for bactericidal activity.