Comparative in vitro activity of PD 127391, a new fluoroquinolone agent, against susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of gram-positive cocci

Activities of clinafloxacin, alone and in combination with other compounds, against 45 gram-positive and -negative organisms for which clinafloxacin MICs are high

Time-kill studies indicated that clinafloxacin showed synergy after 24 h with ceftazidime, amikacin, and imipenem against 12, 8, and 10 of 33 gram-negative rods, respectively; with vancomycin, teicoplanin, cefotaxime, and amikacin against 3, 3, 1, and 1 of 9 staphylococci and enterococci, respectively; and with vancomycin, penicillin, and cefotaxime against 0, 2, and 2 of 3 pneumococci, respectively. The MICs of clinafloxacin alone for most strains were >/=1 microg/ml.

Comparative activities of clinafloxacin against gram-positive and -negative bacteria

Activities of clinafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, and imipenem against 354 ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -intermediate-resistant organisms were tested by agar dilution. Clinafloxacin yielded the lowest quinolone MICs (< or = 0.5 microg/ml against ciprofloxacin-susceptible organisms and < or = 16.0 microg/ml against ciprofloxacin-intermediate-resistant organisms) compared to those of levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Ceftazidime, piperacillin alone or combined with tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and imipenem usually yielded higher MICs against ciprofloxacin-resistant strains.

Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin: new quinolone antibiotics

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, spectrum of activity, clinical trials, and adverse effects of levofloxacin and sparfloxacin, two new fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search from January 1985 to September 1997. Abstracts and presentations were identified by review of program abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy from 1988 to 1996.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled clinical studies were selected for evaluation; however, uncontrolled studies were included when data were limited for indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In vitro data were selected from comparison trials whenever available. Only in vitro trials that provided data on the minimum inhibitory concentrations required to inhibit 90% of isolates were used. Data from North American studies were selected whenever available.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were evaluated with respect to in vitro activity, study design, clinical and microbiologic outcomes, and adverse drug reactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin are active against pathogens frequently involved in community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Both compounds have enhanced activity compared with ciprofloxacin against most gram-positive bacteria, including enterococci, streptococci, and staphylococci, and retain good activity against most Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sparfloxacin has greater anaerobic activity than levofloxacin, which is more active than ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Although many clinical studies are available only in abstract form, the clinical data demonstrate that these new quinolones are effective for most community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis, and skin and skin structure infections. FDA-approved indications are limited for both compounds to date.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin have improved gram-positive activity compared with that of older fluoroquinolones, and are administered once daily. Sparfloxacin-associated photosensitivity may limit its therapeutic usefulness. Clinical trials confirm that these agents are as effective as traditional therapies for the management of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, sinusitis, urinary tract infections, acute gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis, and skin and skin structure infections.

Susceptibility of ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci to trovafloxacin

The susceptibilities of clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and enterococci obtained over a 13-year period were tested for trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, and ciprofloxacin. For MRSA, MIC50 values for trovafloxacin increased from 0.03 microgram/ml to 1 microgram/ml from 1984-1985 to 1995-1996, but were lower than those noted for ciprofloxacin, which increased from 0.25 microgram/ml to > 8 micrograms/ml during the same period. Trovafloxacin also showed lower MIC50 values (0.12-0.25 microgram/ml) than ciprofloxacin (MIC50 of 0.5-1 microgram/ml) for E. faecalis isolates from 1985 through 1991, but against E. faecium and E. faecalis isolated in 1995-1996, the MIC50 values for both trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin were 2 micrograms/ml and the MIC90 values were > or 8 micrograms/ml. Thus, cross-resistance between fluoroquinolones was shown for both enterococci and MRSA. Whether the greater intrinsic activity of trovafloxacin might allow its use in treating MRSA and enterococcal infections remains to be seen.

Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance

In the last 5 years, clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria with intrinsic or acquired resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics have been encountered increasingly. In many of these isolates, resistance arises from an alteration of the antibiotic target site, with the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine moiety of peptidoglycan precursors being replaced by groups that do not bind glycopeptides. Although the criteria for defining resistance have been revised frequently, the reliable detection of low-level glycopeptide resistance remains problematic and is influenced by the method chosen. Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci have emerged as a particular problem in hospitals, where in addition to sporadic cases, clusters of infections with evidence of interpatient spread have occurred. Studies using molecular typing methods have implicated colonization of patients, staff carriage, and environmental contamination in the dissemination of these bacteria. Choice of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant bacteria may be complicated by resistance to other antibiotics. Severe therapeutic difficulties are being encountered among patients infected with enterococci, with some infections being untreatable with currently available antibiotics.

In vitro and in vivo activities of clinafloxacin, CI-990 (PD 131112), and PD 138312 versus enterococci

Certain new fluoroquinolones have high activity against enterococci. Against Enterococcus faecalis (n = 18), MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited were as follows (in micrograms per milliliter): clinafloxacin, 0.125; CI-990, 0.5; and PD 138312, 0.25 (compared with 1 microgram/ml for ciprofloxacin and 2 micrograms/ml for ofloxacin). Strains producing beta-lactamase or that were vancomycin resistant or resistant to high-level gentamicin were not quinolone cross-resistant. The drugs were bactericidal and were unaffected by 50% human serum. Oral efficacies (in milligrams per kilogram of body weight for 50% protective doses) in lethal mouse infections with quinolone-susceptible strains were 4.3 to 24 for clinafloxacin, 7.2 to 39 for CI-990, 7.2 to 76 for PD 138312, and 41 to > 100 for ciprofloxacin; when the drugs were given subcutaneously, the order was similar and values ranged from 1.1 to 12.5. Clinafloxacin, CI-990, and PD 138312 may have therapeutic potential in systemic enterococcal infections in humans.

Comparison of the in vitro activity of levofloxacin and other antimicrobial agents against vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species

The in vitro activities of levofloxacin and other antibiotics against 133 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci were evaluated. Only 14 (39%) of the vancomycin-susceptible isolates and 11 (11%) of the vancomycin-resistant isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin. Levofloxacin exhibited a marked inoculum effect for all enterococci tested. These results suggest that levofloxacin may be of limited use in the treatment of serious enterococcal infections.

Clinafloxacin-theophylline drug interaction

OBJECTIVE

To report an apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between clinafloxacin and theophylline in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

CASE SUMMARY

A patient with a history of COPD was admitted for a fracture of the right femoral neck. Admission medications included extended-release theophylline 400 mg bid. The initial serum theophylline concentration was 81.03 mumol/L (normal 55-110). A subsequent concentration was subtherapeutic (46.62 mumol/L) and the theophylline dosage was increased to 300 mg tid. Therapeutic steady-state concentrations were achieved. The patient later developed pneumonia and was enrolled in a study of nosocomial acquired pneumonia involving clinafloxacin versus ceftazidime. He was randomized to receive clinafloxacin 200 mg iv q12h. After clinafloxacin therapy was initiated, the serum theophylline concentration increased into the toxic range (155.96 mumol/L). Theophylline administration was held for 2 doses and the dosage then reduced to 200 mg tid. Serum concentrations decreased to within the therapeutic range.

DISCUSSION

The fluoroquinolones have been shown to interact with the hepatic metabolism of theophylline and increase serum theophylline concentrations. The quinolone metabolite, 4-oxoquinolone, inhibits the N-demethylation of theophylline, leading to a decrease in the clearance of theophylline. The resultant rise in theophylline concentrations corresponds with the decrease in clearance and possible toxicity. In our patient, careful monitoring of theophylline concentrations and dosage adjustments resulted in the restoration of therapeutic serum concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The observation of this drug interaction between clinafloxacin and theophylline suggests a need for prudent monitoring of theophylline concentrations. Dosage adjustments may be warranted when this combination of medications is used. Such action may prevent significant toxicities and prolonged hospitalization. Further controlled clinical trials in healthy volunteers are needed to substantiate the interaction between clinafloxacin and theophylline.

In vitro activity of fluoroquinolones against gram-positive bacteria

This paper reviews the in vitro activities of several newer fluoroquinolone antimicrobials that exhibit enhanced potency against Gram-positive bacteria. Several of these agents demonstrate 10-fold greater activity than older members of this class against Staphylococcus aureus and inhibit [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) values < or = 2 mg/L] many isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Markedly enhanced activity is also noted against Streptococcus pneumoniae, 90% of isolates being inhibited at concentrations 10- to 100-fold lower than those of the older agents. Enterococci also exhibit greater susceptibility to several of the newer fluoroquinolones, although relative cross-resistance with the earlier drugs is noted. As determined by dilution techniques, the new fluoroquinolones generally demonstrate bactericidal activity at concentrations at or near their MIC values. The activities of the new compounds described here are decreased at low pH, but are not affected by the addition of up to 50% human serum to the test medium. Resistance is rarely detected (frequency < 10(-9)) when high density bacterial suspensions are plated in the presence of 4 times the MIC of these compounds. However, colonies displaying relative resistance to the new agents can be selected by serial passage in incremental antimicrobial concentrations.

Susceptibility of ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci to clinafloxacin

Clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterococcus faecalis obtained from the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center within the last decade were tested for susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. For MRSA isolates, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ciprofloxacin were several fold higher than those noted with clinafloxacin. Prior to the introduction of the fluoroquinolones (1984-1985), all MRSA isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. By 1993, virtually all MRSA isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin and a 50-fold increase in the MIC50 and MIC90 for clinafloxacin was seen. In 1985-1986, most enterococcal isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. By 1993, one-third of all enterococci were resistant to both ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. Fluoroquinolone resistance developed more quickly in enterococci that demonstrated high-level gentamicin resistance. Thus, cross-resistance between clinafloxacin and ciprofloxacin was seen; however, the lower MICs of clinafloxacin for MRSA may allow the use of this drug for some MRSA infections.

Comparative in vitro activity of DU-6859a, a new fluoroquinolone agent, against gram-positive cocci

The in vitro activity of DU-6859a (DU), a new fluoroquinolone agent, was evaluated against 233 gram-positive cocci and was compared with those of ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, nafcillin, and ampicillin. The MICs of DU for 90% of the staphylococci tested were < or = 0.06 microgram/ml. All of the groups A and B and viridans group streptococci were inhibited by < or = 0.125 microgram of DU per ml, which was 32-fold more active than ciprofloxacin. On the basis of MICs for 90% of the strains tested, DU was 32- and 16-fold more active than ciprofloxacin against Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. The bactericidal activity of DU was demonstrated by time-kill techniques against all ciprofloxacin-susceptible enterococci. DU shows promise for the treatment of infections with gram-positive cocci and warrants further evaluation by in vitro and in vivo studies.

Bactericidal activity of the fluoroquinolone WIN 57273 against high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis

The fluoroquinolone WIN 57273 showed identical bactericidal activities (MBC for 90% of the strains = 0.25 micrograms/ml) for bacteremic strains of Enterococcus faecalis with and without high-level gentamicin resistance. WIN 57273 was bactericidal in time-kill measurements with highly gentamicin-resistant, ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains of E. faecalis. However, WIN 57273 was indifferent with penicillin for gentamicin-resistant E. faecalis and was not bactericidal for ciprofloxacin-resistant E. faecalis.

Fluoroquinolones in bronchopulmonary infections

In recent years, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, two of the most common pathogens causing bronchopulmonary infections, have developed resistance towards beta-lactam antibiotics in many areas of the globe. In some countries, resistance rates are so high that treatment with penicillin can not be recommended as the therapy of choice. Unfortunately, many S. pneumoniae strains resistant to penicillins are also resistant to co-trimoxazole and erythromycin, and even to the novel macrolides. Present fluoroquinolones may have to be used in such resistant cases. The fluoroquinolones possess a superior activity against H. influenzae and other pathogens causing bronchitis and pneumonia. Fluoroquinolones have a favourable pharmacokinetic profile including penetration into sputum, bronchial fluid, alveolar lining fluid and alveolar macrophages, and therapeutic concentrations and ratios are superior to those of the beta-lactams. Fluoroquinolones have been shown to produce better results than the comparative agents in bronchitis and, in cystic fibrosis, they achieve a definite clinical amelioration in paediatric patients without substantial additional toxicity. Their use in legionnaires' disease has not been confirmed and their place in the treatment of community-acquired pneimonias - particularly those caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis and the TWAR agent - deserves further investigation.

In vitro activity of sparfloxacin and clinafloxacin against multidrug-resistant enterococci

We evaluated the in vitro susceptibility of 140 clinical enterococcal isolates to the quinolones sparfloxacin and clinafloxacin. Isolates included Enterococcus faecalis (107), Enterococcus faecium (29), Enterococcus raffinosus (3), and one Enterococcus gallinarum. There were 111 isolates that showed high-level [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) > or = 2000 micrograms/ml] resistance to gentamicin and were resistant to high levels of all other aminoglycosides; five isolates produced beta-lactamase; 21 isolates were resistant (MIC > or = 16 micrograms/ml) to ampicillin and were not beta-lactamase producers; and 13 strains were resistant (MIC > or = 32 micrograms/ml) to vancomycin. Most strains were susceptible to low concentrations of sparfloxacin and clinafloxacin, with MIC90S of 0.6 microgram/ml and 0.5 micrograms/ml, respectively. There were no inoculum effects. Time-kill experiments were performed with 22 strains; using 2 x MIC at 24 h, a > or = 2 log10 reduction in growth was observed with sparfloxacin and clinafloxacin for 14 and 17 strains, respectively. Time-kill synergism experiments were performed with 15 strains lacking high-level aminoglycoside resistance. In vitro bacterial synergism with the combination of sparfloxacin or clinafloxacin with streptomycin or gentamicin was observed for five and 12 isolates, respectively. The bactericidal activity of sparfloxacin and clinafloxacin suggest that these antibiotics may prove useful for therapy of multidrug resistant enterococci.

In vitro activity of CP-99,219, a new fluoroquinolone, against clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria

The in vitro activity of the fluoroquinolone CP-99,219 against gram-positive bacteria was compared with those of five other antimicrobial agents. Against ciprofloxacin-susceptible staphylococci and against streptococci, MICs were < or = 0.12 and < or = 0.5 microgram/ml, respectively. CP-99,219 was also more active than ciprofloxacin against ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci, most enterococci, Leuconostoc spp., and lactobacilli.

The future of the quinolones

This review attempts to predict the future of the newer fluoroquinolones by examining what we have learned about this class of compounds during the past decade, as well as what we are currently learning from research and developmental efforts. The molecular mechanism of action of these compounds provides the potential for use in clinical medicine in areas other than their role as antibacterial agents. The newer fluoroquinolones that are currently available and those that have been introduced into the pipeline are categorised by their current stage of development. Also listed are those compounds that have been withdrawn from further investigation. Office practice physicians consider the oral fluoroquinolones to be very effective therapeutic agents for many of their patients. Thus, the future of the fluoroquinolones looks promising because of their unique mechanism of action, the possibility of developing novel and improved compounds in this class, and the acceptance of these compounds as effective therapeutic agents by clinicians.

Impact of the fluoroquinolones on gastrointestinal flora

A number of studies have been performed to evaluate the effect of the fluoroquinolones on gastrointestinal flora. The fluoroquinolones have only slight or no effect on the oropharyngeal flora, except when Neisseria, Haemophilus or Branhamella spp. are present. Studies have consistently shown that Gram-negative facultative bacteria of the lower intestinal flora are strongly suppressed during administration of these agents. Total faecal anaerobes are generally unchanged. The effect of the fluoroquinolones on Gram-positive bacteria is more variable with mild to moderate suppression reported with some agents. In view of the high faecal concentrations of the fluoroquinolones, the general lack of effect on anaerobes is surprising; it may be attributable to the large number of microorganisms found in faeces and faecal binding of the fluoroquinolones. Several recent studies suggest that the effects of some fluoroquinolones on faecal anaerobes and Gram-positive cocci may be more profound in certain patient populations such as bone marrow transplant recipients and patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Colonisation with yeasts and the emergence of resistant bacterial strains have been reported during or after fluoroquinolone administration in some studies. Future studies will need to investigate the effect of the newer agents with greater activity against anaerobes and Gram-positive cocci on the gastrointestinal flora and to continue surveillance for resistant organisms.