In vitro analysis of the interaction between sucralfate and ketoconazole

Drug Interactions with Antiulcer Agents: Considerations in the Treatment of Acid-Peptic Disease

All of the antiulcer agents have been implicated in drug interactions. These agents generally influence the absorption, metabolism, or elimination of other medications. However, these interactions can lead to alterations in pharmacodynamic response. The mechanisms by which antiulcer agents produce drug interactions differ among the agents. It is beyond the scope of this article to review all of the drug interactions that have been reported with antiulcer agents. However, it is the intent to provide the reader with a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which antiulcer agents may interact with other medications and to provide insight into factors that may influence the potential magnitude or clinical consequences of these interactions. An understanding of antiulcer drug interactions will aid pharmacists in assisting clinicians with drug selection and/or monitoring of drug interactions. Specifically, pharmacists can assist with the identification of potential antiulcer drug interactions and develop strategies designed to minimize adverse consequences of these interactions.

The Rise and Fall of Oral Ketoconazole

Background:

Ketoconazole was the first broad-spectrum oral antifungal agent available to treat systemic and superficial mycoses. Evidence of hepatotoxicity associated with its use emerged within the first few years of its approval. Growing evidence of serious side effects including endocrine dysregulation, several drug interactions, and death led to the review of oral ketoconazole in 2011.

Objective:

This article chronicles the use of oral ketoconazole from its introduction to its near replacement in medicine.

Conclusion:

Due to its hepatotoxic side effects, oral ketoconazole was withdrawn from the European and Australian markets in 2013. The United States imposed strict relabeling requirements and restrictions for prescription, with Canada issuing a risk communication echoing these concerns. Today, oral ketoconazole is only indicated for endemic mycoses, where alternatives are not available or feasible. Meanwhile, topical ketoconazole is effective, safe, and widely prescribed for superficial mycoses, particularly as the first-line treatment for tinea versicolor.

In vitro release--in vivo microbiological and toxicological studies on ketoconazole lipid granules

In some multidrug therapy programs, ketoconazole (KTZ) may be administered with some antacids that could modify its dissolution rate and reduce its absorption, thus leading to therapeutic failures. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of Compritol HD5 ATO and Compritol 888 ATO on this interaction in comparison with commercial KTZ tablets. The second aim was to prepare lipid granules of KTZ that could be an alternative to the commercial formulation. Therefore, six KTZ sustained-release granules were prepared with different lipid concentrations, because they were found to be more suitable than tablets that are dissolved only in gastric medium. The results confirmed that the dissolution rate of KTZ granules was significantly reduced in the presence of antacids. The ideal formulation was selected as granules including 5% of Compritol lipids in relation to the suitability of the target profile. Therapeutic effects of orally administered, ideal KTZ granule formulations, and commercial tablets were evaluated in vivo by the experimental model of murine vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) with and without antacids. It was found that formulations were very effective on VVC, and the therapeutic effect decreased significantly in the presence of antacids. Histopathological studies were carried out for vagina, stomach, and liver tissues and hepatoxicity was also examined. The levels of reduced glutathione (GSH) were measured to assess the oxidative stress induced by KTZ and function of the liver. It was observed that orally administered formulations of KTZ were successful in treating candidiasis in mice without irritancy in stomach. However, liver tissues were damaged. The decreased GSH levels indicated toxicity in our study. This study suggested that in vitro release and in vivo microbiological-toxicological properties of KTZ were affected by antacids and drug-excipient interactions. Lipid granules of KTZ prepared with Compritol 888 ATO could be proposed as a new KTZ solid dosage form with optimum dissolution and therapeutic characteristics.

Gastric function in the elderly: effects on absorption of ketoconazole

The authors studied effects of age-related changes in gastric function on absorption of ketoconazole. Eighteen men and women age 65 years or older swallowed 200 mg ketoconazole on two occasions, once as tablets with water and once as tablets crushed in acidic juice. The sequence was randomly determined. Gastric pH was measured by radiotelemetry and gastric emptying rate by radiolabeled technetium with a gamma camera. Plasma ketoconazole was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Subjects with gastric pH less than or equal to 4.5 absorbed ketoconazole equally well from intact tablets and tablets crushed in acid. When pH was 5.0 or higher, ketoconazole was absorbed well from acid-crushed tablets but not from intact tablets. Gastric emptying was shown to be rapid in all subjects. Since the prevalence of such hypoacivity is approximately 5% in the elderly, and other parameters of gastric function are usually normal, impaired absorption of drugs such as ketoconazole should be uncommon with normal aging.

Systemic antifungal agents. Drug interactions of clinical significance

There are 3 main classes of systemic antifungals: the polyene macrolides (e.g. amphotericin B), the azoles (e.g. the imidazoles ketoconazole and miconazole and the triazoles itraconazole and fluconazole) and the allylamines (e.g. terbinafine). Other systemic antifungals include griseofulvin and flucytosine. Most drug-drug interactions involving systemic antifungals have negative consequences. The interactions of amphotericin B, flucytosine, griseofulvin, terbinafine and azole antifungals can be divided into the following categories: (i) additive dangerous interactions; (ii) modifications of antifungal kinetics by other drugs; and (iii) modifications of the kinetics of other drugs by antifungals. Amphotericin B and flucytosine mainly interact with other agents pharmacodynamically. Clinically important drug interactions with amphotericin B cause nephrotoxicity, hypokalaemia and blood dyscrasias. The most important drug interaction of flucytosine occurs with myelotoxic agents. Hypokalaemia can precipitate the long QT syndrome, as well as potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias like torsade de pointes. Synergism is likely to occur when either QT interval-modifying drugs (e.g. terfenadine and astemizole) and drugs that induce hypokalaemia (e.g. amphotericin B) are coadministered. Induction and inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes at hepatic and extrahepatic sites are the mechanisms that underlie the most serious pharmacokinetic drug interactions of the azole antifungals. These agents have been shown to notably decrease the catabolism of numerous drugs: histamine H1 receptor antagonists, warfarin, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, digoxin, felodipine, lovastatin, midazolam, triazolam, methylprednisolone, glibenclamide (glyburide), phenytoin, rifabutin, ritonavir, saquinavir, nevirapine and nortriptyline. Non-antifungal drugs like carbamazepine, phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), phenytoin and rifampicin (rifampin) can induce the metabolism of azole antifungals. The bioavailability of ketoconazole and itraconazole is also reduced by drugs that increase gastric pH, such as H2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, sucralfate and didanosine. Griseofulvin is an enzymatic inducer of coumarin-like drugs and estrogens, whereas terbinafine seems to have a low potential for drug interactions. Despite important advances in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying pharmacokinetic drug interactions during the 1990s, at this time they still remain difficult to predict in terms of magnitude in individual patients. This is because of the large interindividual and intraindividual variations in the catalytic activity of those metabolising enzymes that can either be induced or inhibited by various drugs. Notwithstanding these variations, increasing clinical experience is allowing pharmacokinetic interactions to be used to advantage in order to improve the tolerability of some drugs, as recently exemplified by the use of a fixed combination of ketoconazole and cyclosporin.

In vivo interaction of ketoconazole and sucralfate in healthy volunteers

Absorption of ketoconazole is impaired in subjects with an increased gastric pH due to administration of antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, or the presence of hypochlorhydria. Sucralfate could provide an attractive alternative in patients receiving ketoconazole who require therapy for acid-peptic disorders. Twelve healthy human volunteers were administered a single 400-mg oral dose of ketoconazole in each of three randomized treatment phases. In phase A, ketoconazole was administered orally with 240 ml of water. In phase B, ketoconazole and sucralfate (1.0 g) were administered simultaneously with 240 ml of water. In phase C, ketoconazole was administered with 240 ml of water 2 h after administration of sucralfate (1.0 g) orally with 240 ml of water. A 680-mg oral dose of glutamic acid hydrochloride was administered 10 min prior to and with each dose of ketoconazole, sucralfate, or ketoconazole plus sucralfate. Simultaneous administration of ketoconazole and sucralfate led to a significant reduction in the area under the concentration-time curve and maximal concentration of ketoconazole in serum (78.12 +/- 12.20 versus 59.32 +/- 13.61 micrograms.h/ml and 12.34 +/- 3.07 versus 8.92 +/- 2.57 micrograms/ml, respectively; P < 0.05). When ketoconazole was administered 2 h after sucralfate, the observed ketoconazole area under the concentration-time curve was not significantly decreased compared with that of ketoconazole alone. The time to maximal concentrations in serum and the ketoconazole elimination rate constant were not significantly different in any of the three treatment phases. In patients receiving concurrent administration of ketoconazole and sucralfate, doses should be separated by at least 2 h.