MIC and time-kill study of activities of DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, cefotaxime, imipenem, and vancomycin against nine penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci

Dialyzability and pharmacokinetics of sitafloxacin following multiple oral dosing in infected hemodialysis patients

The pharmacokinetics and dialyzability of oral sitafloxacin, a newly available quinolone, in infected intermittent hemodialysis patients have not been reported previously. Seven infected maintenance hemodialysis patients lacking residual renal function were enrolled. Sitafloxacin (50 mg after hemodialysis on the first day, on the next day and 4 h before scheduled hemodialysis session on the 3rd day) was orally administered. On the 3rd day, blood was taken from arterial and venous sides before and 2 and 4 h after session initiation. Another sampling was performed 1 h after the session and on the 5(th) day of the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters and dialyzability of sitafloxacin were evaluated. All patients exhibited improved symptoms without major problems. Drug concentrations in all arterial samples were above the MIC of targeted bacteria. Dialyzer clearance and elimination fraction were 49.9 ± 0.9 mL/min per m(2) and 53.3 ± 2.1%, respectively. Apparent half-life during dialysis session was significantly shorter than that after the session (4.0 ± 0.4 and 46.5 ± 3.6 h, during and after the session, respectively). Dialyzer clearance was positively correlated with urea reduction ratio and negatively correlated with serum albumin concentration. About 23% of the drug in the body was removed by dialysis. Rebound of the drug concentration after the dialysis was not seen. Oral dosing of this drug at 50 mg daily in maintenance hemodialysis patients provides a safe drug concentration compatible with that of healthy subjects orally receiving 100 mg daily. Because a significant amount of the drug was removed, administration might be undertaken after the dialysis session.

Bacterial Infections in the Elderly Patient: Focus on Sitafloxacin

Sitafloxacin (DU-6859a) is a new-generation oral fluoroquinolone with in vitro activity against a broad range of Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, including anaerobic bacteria, as well as against atypical bacterial pathogens. Particularly in Japan this antibiotic was approved in 2008 for treatment of a number of bacterial infections caused by Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative cocci and rods, including anaerobia atypical bacterial pathogens. As compared to oral levofloxacin sitafloxacin was non-inferior in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and non-inferior in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, according to the results of randomized, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trials. Non-comparative studies demonstrated the efficacy of oral sitafloxacin in otorhinolaryngological infections, urethritis in men, cervicitis in women and odontogenic infections. Most common adverse reactions were gastrointestinal disorders and laboratory abnormalities in patients receiving oral sitafloxacin; diarrhea and liver enzyme elevations were among the common. In the Japanese population sitafloxacin covers broad spectrum of bacteria as compared to carbapenems, whereas in the Caucasians its use is currently limited due to the potential for ultraviolet A phototoxicity. Sitafloxacin is a promising therapeutic agent which merits further investigation in randomized clinical trials of elderly patients.

Comparative antipneumococcal activities of sulopenem and other drugs

For 297 penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant pneumococcal strains, the sulopenem MIC(50)s were 0.008, 0.06, and 0.25, respectively, and the sulopenem MIC(90)s were 0.016, 0.25, and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively. The MIC(50)s of amoxicillin for the corresponding strains were 0.03, 0.25, and 2.0 microg/ml, respectively, and the MIC(90)s were 0.03, 1.0, and 8.0 microg/ml, respectively. The combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate gave MICs similar to those obtained with amoxicillin alone. The sulopenem MICs were similar to those of imipenem and meropenem. The MICs of ss-lactams increased with those of penicillin G, and among the quinolones tested, moxifloxacin had the lowest MICs. Additionally, 45 strains of drug-resistant type 19A pneumococci were tested by agar dilution and gave sulopenem MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s of 1.0 and 2.0 microg/ml, respectively. Both sulopenem and amoxicillin (with and without clavulanate) were bactericidal against all 12 strains tested at 2x MIC after 24 h. Thirty-one strains from 10 countries with various penicillin, amoxicillin, and carbapenems MICs, including those with the highest sulopenem MICs, were selected for sequencing analysis of the pbp1a, pbp2x, and pbp2b regions encoding the transpeptidase active site and MurM. We did not find any correlations between specific penicillin-binding protein-MurM patterns and changes in the MICs.

In vitro activity of DC-159a, a new broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone, compared with that of other agents against drug-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci

DC-159a yielded MICs of <or=1 mug/ml against 316 strains of both quinolone-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci (resistance was defined as a levofloxacin MIC >or=4 microg/ml). Although the MICs for DC-159a against quinolone-susceptible pneumococci were a few dilutions higher than those of gemifloxacin, the MICs of these two compounds against 28 quinolone-resistant pneumococci were identical. The DC-159a MICs against quinolone-resistant strains did not appear to depend on the number or the type of mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region. DC-159a, as well as the other quinolones tested, was bactericidal after 24 h at 2x MIC against 11 of 12 strains tested. Two of the strains were additionally tested at 1 and 2 h, and DC-159a at 4x MIC showed significant killing as early as 2 h. Multistep resistance selection studies showed that even after 50 consecutive subcultures of 10 strains in the presence of sub-MICs, DC-159a produced only two mutants with maximum MICs of 1 microg/ml.

Structure-activity relationships of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus anthracis dihydrofolate reductase: toward the identification of new potent drug leads

New and improved therapeutics are needed for Bacillus anthracis, the etiological agent of anthrax. To date, antimicrobial agents have not been developed against the well-validated target dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). In order to address whether DHFR inhibitors could have potential use as clinical agents against Bacillus, 27 compounds were screened against this enzyme from Bacillus cereus, which is identical to the enzyme from B. anthracis at the active site. Several 2,4-diamino-5-deazapteridine compounds exhibit submicromolar 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s). Four of the inhibitors displaying potency in vitro were tested in vivo and showed a marked growth inhibition of B. cereus; the most potent of these has MIC(50) and minimum bactericidal concentrations at which 50% are killed of 1.6 mug/ml and 0.09 mug/ml, respectively. In order to illustrate structure-activity relationships for the classes of inhibitors tested, each of the 27 inhibitors was docked into homology models of the B. cereus and B. anthracis DHFR proteins, allowing the development of a rationale for the inhibition profiles. A combination of favorable interactions with the diaminopyrimidine and substituted phenyl rings explains the low IC(50) values of potent inhibitors; steric interactions explain higher IC(50) values. These experiments show that DHFR is a reasonable antimicrobial target for Bacillus anthracis and that there is a class of inhibitors that possess sufficient potency and antibacterial activity to suggest further development.

Antipneumococcal activity of DW-224a, a new quinolone, compared to those of eight other agents

DW-224a is a new broad-spectrum quinolone with excellent antipneumococcal activity. Agar dilution MIC was used to test the activity of DW-224a compared to those of penicillin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime, and azithromycin against 353 quinolone-susceptible pneumococci. The MICs of 29 quinolone-resistant pneumococci with defined quinolone resistance mechanisms against seven quinolones and an efflux mechanism were also tested. DW-224a was the most potent quinolone against quinolone-susceptible pneumococci (MIC(50), 0.016 microg/ml; MIC(90), 0.03 microg/ml), followed by gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. beta-Lactam MICs rose with those of penicillin G, and azithromycin resistance was seen mainly in strains with raised penicillin G MICs. Against the 29 quinolone-resistant strains, DW-224a had the lowest MICs (0.06 to 1 microg/ml) compared to those of gemifloxacin, clinafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. DW-224a at 2x MIC was bactericidal after 24 h against eight of nine strains tested. Other quinolones gave similar kill kinetics relative to higher MICs. Serial passages of nine strains in the presence of sub-MIC concentrations of DW-224a, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime, and azithromycin were performed. DW-224a yielded resistant clones similar to moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin but also yielded lower MICs. Azithromycin selected resistant clones in three of the five parents tested. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefuroxime did not yield resistant clones after 50 days.

Investigational new drugs for the treatment of resistant pneumococcal infections

Antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is not only increasing with penicillin but also with other antimicrobial classes including the macrolides, tetracyclines and sulfonamides. This trend with antibiotic resistance has highlighted the need for the further development of new anti-infectives for the treatment of pneumococcal infections, particularly against multi-drug resistant pneumococci. Several new drugs with anti-pneumococcal activity are at various stages of development and will be discussed in this review. Two new cephalosporins with activity against S. pneumoniae include ceftobiprole and RWJ-54428. Faropenem is in a new class of beta-lactam antibiotics called the penems. Structurally, the penems are a hybrid between the penicillins and cephalosporins. Sitafloxacin and garenoxacin are two new quinolones that are likely to have a role in treating pneumococcal infections. Oritavancin and dalbavancin are glycopeptides with activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. as well as multi-drug resistant pneumococci. Tigecycline is the first drug in a new class of anti-infectives called the glycycyclines that has activity against penicillin-resistant pneumococci.

Antipneumococcal activity of dalbavancin compared to other agents

Against 307 pneumococci of various resistotypes, dalbavancin MICs were 0.008 to 0.125 microg/ml. All strains were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin. Dalbavancin at 2x MIC was bactericidal against all 10 pneumococci tested after 24 h. Vancomycin and teicoplanin killed 10 and 8 strains, respectively, at 2x MIC after 24 h.

In vivo efficacies and pharmacokinetics of DX-619, a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone, against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a mouse lung infection model

DX-619 is a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone with potent activity against gram-positive pathogens. The in vivo activity of DX-619 against Streptococcus pneumoniae was compared with those of fluoro(6) quinolones, sitafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in a mouse model. Two strains of S. pneumoniae were used: a penicillin-sensitive S. pneumoniae (PSSP) strain and a penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP) strain. Furthermore, these strains showed intermediate susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin. In murine lung infections caused by PSSP, the 50% effective doses (ED50s) of DX-619, sitafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were 9.15, 11.1, and 127.6 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. Against PRSP-mediated pneumonia in mice, the ED50s of DX-619, sitafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were 0.69, 4.84, and 38.75 mg/kg, respectively. The mean +/- standard error of the mean viable bacterial counts in murine lungs infected with PSSP and treated with DX-619, sitafloxacin, ciprofloxacin (10 mg/kg twice daily), and saline (twice daily) were 1.75 +/- 0.06, 1.92 +/- 0.23, 6.48 +/- 0.28, and 7.57 +/- 0.13 log10 CFU/ml, respectively. Furthermore, the numbers of viable bacteria in lungs infected with PRSP and treated with the three agents and not treated (control) were 1.73 +/- 0.04, 2.28 +/- 0.17, 4.61 +/- 0.59, and 5.54 +/- 0.72 log10 CFU/ml, respectively. DX-619 and sitafloxacin significantly decreased the numbers of viable bacteria in the lungs compared to the numbers in the lungs of ciprofloxacin-treated and untreated mice. The pharmacokinetic parameter of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio in the lungs for DX-619, sitafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were 171.0, 21.92, and 1.22, respectively. The AUC/MIC ratio in the lungs was significantly higher for DX-619 than for sitafloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Our results suggest that DX-619 and sitafloxacin are potent against both PSSP and PRSP in our mouse pneumonia model.

Antipneumococcal activity of ceftobiprole, a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin

Ceftobiprole (previously known as BAL9141), an anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cephalosporin, was very highly active against a panel of 299 drug-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci, with MIC(50) and MIC(90) values (microg/ml) of 0.016 and 0.016 (penicillin susceptible), 0.06 and 0.5 (penicillin intermediate), and 0.5 and 1.0 (penicillin resistant). Ceftobiprole, imipenem, and ertapenem had lower MICs against all pneumococcal strains than amoxicillin, cefepime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, or cefdinir. Macrolide and penicillin G MICs generally varied in parallel, whereas fluoroquinolone MICs did not correlate with penicillin or macrolide susceptibility or resistance. All strains were susceptible to linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. Time-kill analyses showed that at 1x and 2x the MIC, ceftobiprole was bactericidal against 10/12 and 11/12 strains, respectively. Levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were each bactericidal against 10 to 12 strains at 2x the MIC. Azithromycin and clarithromycin were slowly bactericidal, and telithromycin was bactericidal against only 5/12 strains at 2x the MIC. Linezolid was mainly bacteriostatic, whereas quinupristin-dalfopristin and daptomycin showed marked killing at early time periods. Prolonged serial passage in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of ceftobiprole failed to yield mutants with high MICs towards this cephalosporin, and single-passage selection showed very low frequencies of spontaneous mutants with breakthrough MICs towards ceftobiprole.

Activity of the new quinolone WCK 771 against pneumococci

The activity of WCK 771, a new experimental quinolone being developed to overcome quinolone resistance in staphylococci, against quinolone-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci was determined. Comparative activities of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, clinafloxacin, vancomycin, linezolid, amoxycillin, cefuroxime, azithromycin and clarithromycin were determined with MIC and time-kill experiments. Animal experiments were also performed to test the in-vivo anti-pneumococcal activity of WCK 771 compared to levofloxacin. WCK 771 MIC50/90 values for 300 quinolone-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates (108 penicillin-susceptible, 92 penicillin-intermediate and 100 penicillin-resistant) were 0.5/0.5 mg/L; the MICs of beta-lactams and macrolides rose with those of penicillin G, and all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. WCK 771 MIC50/90 values for 25 quinolone-resistant pneumococcal isolates were 4/8 mg/L, compared to 0.5/1 mg/L for clinafloxacin, 2/4 mg/L for gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, 8/16 mg/L for levofloxacin, and 16/>32 mg/L for ciprofloxacin. Time-kill studies showed that WCK 771 was bactericidal against pneumococci after 24 h at 4 x MIC, as were the other quinolones tested. Animal model studies showed that WCK 771 had efficacy comparable to that of levofloxacin, by both the oral and subcutaneous routes, for systemic infection caused by three quinolone-susceptible isolates of pneumococci. Overall, WCK 771 was potent both in vivo and in vitro against quinolone-susceptible, but not quinolone-resistant, S. pneumoniae, regardless of penicillin susceptibility.

Antipneumococcal activity of LBM415, a new peptide deformylase inhibitor, compared with those of other agents

The MICs of LBM415, a new peptide diformylase inhibitor, were evaluated and ranged from 0.03 to 4.0 microg/ml for 300 pneumococci, irrespective of their beta-lactam, macrolide, and quinolone susceptibilities. By comparison, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin were also active, with MICs </=2.0 microg/ml. Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin were the most active quinolones tested, while the MICs of the beta-lactams rose with those of penicillin G. LBM415 at two times the MIC was bactericidal (99.9% killing) against six strains after 24 h.

In vitro pharmacodynamic activities of ABT-492, a novel quinolone, compared to those of levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis

ABT-492 is a novel quinolone with potent activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and atypical pathogens, making this compound an ideal candidate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. We therefore compared the in vitro pharmacodynamic activity of ABT-492 to that of levofloxacin, an antibiotic commonly used for the treatment of pneumonia, through MIC determination and time-kill kinetic analysis. ABT-492 demonstrated potent activity against penicillin-sensitive, penicillin-resistant, and levofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains (MICs ranging from 0.0078 to 0.125 micro g/ml); beta-lactamase-positive and beta-lactamase-negative Haemophilus influenzae strains (MICs ranging from 0.000313 to 0.00125 micro g/ml); and beta-lactamase-positive and beta-lactamase-negative Moraxella catarrhalis strains (MICs ranging from 0.001 to 0.0025 micro g/ml), with MICs being much lower than those of levofloxacin. Both ABT-492 and levofloxacin demonstrated concentration-dependent bactericidal activities in time-kill kinetics studies at four and eight times the MIC with 10 of 12 bacterial isolates exposed to ABT-492 and with 12 of 12 bacterial isolates exposed to levofloxacin. Sigmoidal maximal-effect models support concentration-dependent bactericidal activity. The model predicts that 50% of maximal activity can be achieved with concentrations ranging from one to two times the MIC for both ABT-492 and levofloxacin and that near-maximal activity (90% effective concentration) can be achieved at concentrations ranging from two to five times the MIC for ABT-492 and one to six times the MIC for levofloxacin.

Antipneumococcal activity of DK-507k, a new quinolone, compared with the activities of 10 other agents

Agar dilution MIC determination was used to compare the activity of DK-507k with those of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, amoxicillin, cefuroxime, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 113 penicillin-susceptible, 81 penicillin-intermediate, and 67 penicillin-resistant pneumococci (all quinolone susceptible). DK-507k and sitafloxacin had the lowest MICs of all quinolones against quinolone-susceptible strains (MIC at which 50% of isolates were inhibited [MIC50] and MIC90 of both, 0.06 and 0.125 microg/ml, respectively), followed by moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. MICs of beta-lactams and macrolides rose with those of penicillin G. Against 26 quinolone-resistant pneumococci with known resistance mechanisms, DK-507k and sitafloxacin were also the most active quinolones (MICs, 0.125 to 1.0 microg/ml), followed by moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions of quinolone-resistant strains were in the usual regions of the parC and gyrA genes. Time-kill testing showed that both DK-507k and sitafloxacin were bactericidal against all 12 quinolone-susceptible and -resistant strains tested at twice the MIC at 24 h. Serial broth passages in subinhibitory concentrations of 10 strains for a minimum of 14 days showed that development of resistant mutants (fourfold or greater increase in the original MIC) occurred most rapidly for ciprofloxacin, followed by moxifloxacin, DK-507k, gatifloxacin, sitafloxacin, and levofloxacin. All parent strains demonstrated a fourfold or greater increase in initial MIC in <50 days. MICs of DK-507k against resistant mutants were lowest, followed by those of sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. Four strains were subcultured in subinhibitory concentrations of each drug for 50 days: MICs of DK-507k against resistant mutants were lowest, followed by those of sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Exposure to DK-507k and sitafloxacin resulted in mutations, mostly in gyrA.

Antipneumococcal and antistaphylococcal activities of ranbezolid (RBX 7644), a new oxazolidinone, compared to those of other agents

For 260 pneumococcal and 266 staphylococcal strains, ranbezolid MICs ranged from < or =0.06 to 4 micro g/ml. The MICs for pneumococci were similar irrespective of the strains' beta-lactam, macrolide, or quinolone susceptibilities, and ranbezolid MICs for coagulase-negative staphylococci were lower than those for Staphylococcus aureus. Ranbezolid was bacteriostatic against pneumococci. Ranbezolid MICs were similar to or lower than those of linezolid. Vancomycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin were also very active.

A new dosing paradigm: High-dose, short-course fluoroquinolone therapy for community-acquired pneumonia

The goals of optimal antimicrobial therapy are to treat infection effectively, to improve the clinical condition of the patient, and to prevent the emergence of resistant bacterial strains. For ideal drug usage the World Health Organization recommends administering the correct drug by the best route, in the right amount, at optimum intervals for the appropriate period, and after an accurate diagnosis. This article discusses the use of high-dose, short-course fluoroquinolone therapy as an effective option for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Antipneumococcal activity of ertapenem (MK-0826) compared to those of other agents

The activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) and eight other agents against a range of penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci were tested by determination of MICs by the microdilution method and by the time-kill methodology. For 125 penicillin-susceptible, 74 penicillin-intermediate, and 86 penicillin-resistant pneumococci, the MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)s) and MIC(90)s, as determined by the microdilution method, were as follows: for ertapenem, 0.016 and 0.03, 0.125 and 0.5, and 0.5 and 1.0 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively; for amoxicillin, < or =0.016 and 0.03, 0.25 and 1.0, and 2.0 and 2.0 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively; for cefprozil, 0.125 and 0.25, 1.0 and 8.0, and 16.0 and 16.0 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively; for cefepime, < or =0.016 and 0.06, 0.5 and 1.0, and 1.0 and 2.0 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively; for ceftriaxone, < or =0.016 and 0.06, 0.25 and 1.0, and 1.0 and 2.0 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively; for imipenem, < or =0.008 and < or =0.008, 0.03 and 0.25, and 0.25 and 0.25 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively; for meropenem, < or =0.008 and 0.016, 0.125 and 0.5, and 0.5 and 1.0 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively; and for clarithromycin, 1.0 and >32.0, 1.0 and >32.0, and >32.0 and >32.0 microg/ml for penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-intermediate, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, respectively. For 64 strains for which quinolone MICs were increased (ciprofloxacin MICs, > or =4.0 microg/ml), the MIC(90) of ertapenem was 1.0 microg/ml and the MIC(90)s of the other beta-lactams tested and clarithromycin were >32.0 microg/ml. Against four penicillin-susceptible, four penicillin-intermediate, and four penicillin-resistant strains, testing by the time-kill methodology showed that ertapenem at two times the MIC was bacteriostatic (99% killing) after 12 h and bactericidal (99.9% killing) against all strains by 24 h, with 90% killing of all strains at two times the MIC after 6 h. At the MIC, ertapenem was bacteriostatic against all strains tested after 24 h. Although the bactericidal activity of imipenem at the MIC after 24 h was significantly greater than that of ertapenem, the kinetics of the two drugs at two times the MIC were similar after 24 h. The killing kinetics of clarithromycin were slower than those of ertapenem and other agents, with clarithromycin at two times the MIC having bactericidal activity against seven of eight macrolide-susceptible strains after 24 h.

Antipneumococcal activity of BMS 284756 compared to those of six other agents

Antipneumococcal activity of BMS 284756 was compared to those of six agents by MIC and time-kill methodologies. BMS 284756 had the lowest MICs compared to those of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin against quinolone-susceptible (< or =0.016 to 0.06 microg/ml) and quinolone-resistant (0.03 to 1 microg/ml) pneumococci. BMS 284756 was bactericidal against 11 of 12 strains at two times the MIC after 24 h.

Activities of newer fluoroquinolones against ciprofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The incidence of ciprofloxacin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is low but steadily increasing, which raises concerns regarding the clinical impact of potential cross-resistance with newer fluoroquinolones. To investigate this problem, we utilized an in vitro pharmacodynamic model and compared the activities of gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin to that of ciprofloxacin against two laboratory-derived, ciprofloxacin-resistant derivatives of S. pneumoniae (strains R919 and R921). Ciprofloxacin resistance in these strains involved the activity of a multidrug efflux pump and possibly, for R919, a mutation resulting in an amino acid substitution in GyrA. Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin achieved 99.9% killing of both R919 and R921 in < or =28 h. With respect to levofloxacin, significant regrowth of both mutants was observed at 48 h (P < 0.05). For gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin, regrowth was minimal at 48 h, with each maintaining 99.9% killing against both mutants. No killing of either R919 or R921 was observed with exposure to ciprofloxacin. During model experiments, resistance to gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin did not develop but the MICs of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin increased 1 to 2 dilutions for both R919 and R921. Although specific area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0--24))/MIC and maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max))/MIC ratios have not been defined for the fluoroquinolones with respect to gram-positive organisms, our study revealed that significant regrowth and/or resistance was associated with AUC(0-24)/MIC ratios of < or =31.7 and C(max)/MIC ratios of < or =3.1. It is evident that the newer fluoroquinolones tested possess improved activity against S. pneumoniae, including strains for which ciprofloxacin MICs were elevated.

Comparative activity of cefodizime and ceftriaxone against respiratory pathogens in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model simulating concentration-time curves

The duration of time that serum levels are above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; T >MIC) seems to be an important pharmacodynamic parameter for beta-lactams. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bactericidal activity of cefodizime and ceftriaxone in a pharmacokinetic model mimicking the concentrations in bronchial mucus and in serum (total and free) obtained at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h, after 1 g i.m. administration once daily. The species investigated were respiratory pathogens (1 strain of Staphylococcus aureus, 2 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1 strain b-lactamase negative and 1 strain beta-lactamase positive of Haemophilus influenzae, 1 strain of Escherichia coli and 1 strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae); MIC50s of the chosen strains were reported. In this in vitro model the concentrations (serum and bronchial mucus) for both antibiotics are generally at or above the MIC values of the tested strains until 24 hours. The killing curve showed rapid killing for both antibiotics: 99.9% killing (a 3-log reduction in growth) within 6 to 8 h, depending upon the microorganism tested. There was no significant difference in the log kill between cefodizime and ceftriaxone. These data confirm that T >MIC for beta-lactams is the pharmacodynamic parameter which best correlates with bactericidal efficacy. On the basis of the killing curve determined for cefodizime versus ceftriaxone at concentrations that these antibiotics can reach during therapy with 1 g i.m. once daily we expect reasonable clinical efficacy with monoadministration of cefodizime as well as for ceftriaxone in respiratory tract infections.

The fluoroquinolone antibacterials: past, present and future perspectives

The history of the development of the quinolones is described from the first quinolone, nalidixic acid, via the first 6-fluorinated quinolone norfloxacin, to the latest extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones. The structural modifications made to the basic quinolone and naphthyridone nucleus and to the side chains have allowed improvements to be made such that the next group of fluoroquinolones after norfloxacin, exemplified by ciprofloxacin, had high activity against gram-negative species and a number of atypical pathogens, good-to-moderate activity against gram-positive species and were well absorbed and distributed. These compounds have been successfully used in the clinic for a decade and the size of the market has risen in recent years to only a little less than that for penicillins and macrolides. Notwithstanding the broad spectrum of these compounds, defects became evident. The growth in understanding of structure activity relationships with fluoroquinolones has enabled the development of even better compounds. The targets in fluoroquinolone research during the last few years include: improvements in pharmacokinetic properties, greater activity against gram-positive cocci and anaerobes, activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, and improvements in activity against non-fermentative gram-negative species. The compounds developed in the recent years have fulfilled some but not all of these goals; improved bioavailability is one target achieved with most of the more recent compounds allowing for once-daily dosing. Gatifloxacin, moxifoxacin and trovafloxacin have all greatly improved the activity against gram-positive cocci, particularly pneumococci, and against anaerobes. They are not quite as active as ciprofloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae, and show no substantial improvements in activity against non-fermentative species. Clinafloxacin, gemifloxacin and sitafloxacin have even better activity against gram-positive cocci and are as active as ciprofloxacin against most gram-negatives, though gemifloxacin is less active than the other new compounds against gram-negative anaerobes. These three compounds do retain some activity against a number of ciprofloxacin-resistant species (gram-positive and gram-negative), but whether this activity will be adequate for clinical use is at present unclear. Both clinafloxacin and sitafloxacin contain a chloro substituent at position 8 of the quinolone nucleus. A halogen at this position in a number of compounds, though giving good activity, has also been associated with phototoxicity. Several fluoroquinolones have had to be withdrawn or strictly limited in their use post-marketing and in some cases no obvious relationship can be seen between the adverse effects and structural features, making this an area for urgent research.

In vitro activities of sitafloxacin (DU-6859a) and six other fluoroquinolones against 8,796 clinical bacterial isolates

The in vitro activities of sitafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin against 5,046 gram-negative bacteria, 3,344 gram-positive cocci, and 406 anaerobes were determined. Sitafloxacin was the most active agent against gram-positive cocci and anaerobes. Against Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenters, its activity was either equivalent to or better than that of clinafloxacin.

Activities and postantibiotic effects of gemifloxacin compared to those of 11 other agents against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis

The activity of gemifloxacin against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis was compared to those of 11 other agents. All quinolones were very active (MICs, </=0.125 microgram/ml) against 248 quinolone-susceptible H. influenzae isolates (40.7% of which were beta-lactamase positive); cefixime (MICs, </=0.125 microgram/ml) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (MICs </=4.0 microgram/ml) were active, followed by cefuroxime (MICs, </=16.0 microgram/ml); azithromycin MICs were </=4.0 microg/ml. For nine H. influenzae isolates with reduced quinolone susceptibilities, the MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)s) were 0.25 microgram/ml for gemifloxacin and 1.0 microgram/ml for the other quinolones tested. All strains had mutations in GyrA (Ser84, Asp88); most also had mutations in ParC (Asp83, Ser84, Glu88) and ParE (Asp420, Ser458), and only one had a mutation in GyrB (Gln468). All quinolones tested were equally active (MICs, </=0.06 microgram/ml) against 50 M. catarrhalis strains; amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime, cefuroxime, and azithromycin were very active. Against 10 H. influenzae strains gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and trovafloxacin at 2x the MIC and ciprofloxacin at 4x the MIC were uniformly bactericidal after 24 h, and against 9 of 10 strains grepafloxacin at 2x the MIC was bactericidal after 24 h. After 24 h bactericidal activity was seen with amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2x the MIC for all strains, cefixime at 2x the MIC for 9 of 10 strains, cefuroxime at 4x the MIC for all strains, and azithromycin at 2x the MIC for all strains. All quinolones except grepafloxacin (which was bactericidal against four of five strains) and all ss-lactams at 2x to 4x the MIC were bactericidal against five M. catarrhalis strains after 24 h; azithromycin at the MIC was bactericidal against all strains after 24 h. The postantibiotic effects (PAEs) against four quinolone-susceptible H. influenzae strains were as follows: gemifloxacin, 0.3 to 2.3 h; ciprofloxacin, 1.3 to 4.2 h; levofloxacin, 2.8 to 6.2 h; sparfloxacin, 0.6 to 3.0 h; grepafloxacin, 0 to 2.1 h; trovafloxacin, 0.8 to 2.8 h. At 10x the MIC, no quinolone PAEs were found against the strain for which quinolone MICs were increased. Azithromycin PAEs were 3.7 to 7.3 h.

Antipneumococcal activities of gemifloxacin compared to those of nine other agents

The activities of gemifloxacin compared to those of nine other agents was tested against a range of penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci by agar dilution, microdilution, time-kill, and post-antibiotic effect (PAE) methods. Against 64 penicillin-susceptible, 68 penicillin-intermediate, and 75 penicillin-resistant pneumococci (all quinolone susceptible), agar dilution MIC(50)s (MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited)/MIC(90)s (in micrograms per milliliter) were as follows: gemifloxacin, 0.03/0.06; ciprofloxacin, 1.0/4.0; levofloxacin, 1.0/2. 0; sparfloxacin, 0.5/1.0; grepafloxacin, 0.125/0.5; trovafloxacin, 0. 125/0.25; amoxicillin, 0.016/0.06 (penicillin-susceptible isolates), 0.125/1.0 (penicillin-intermediate isolates), and 2.0/4.0 (penicillin-resistant isolates); cefuroxime, 0.03/0.25 (penicillin-susceptible isolates), 0.5/2.0 (penicillin-intermediate isolates), and 8.0/16.0 (penicillin-resistant isolates); azithromycin, 0.125/0.5 (penicillin-susceptible isolates), 0. 125/>128.0 (penicillin-intermediate isolates), and 4.0/>128.0 (penicillin-resistant isolates); and clarithromycin, 0.03/0.06 (penicillin-susceptible isolates), 0.03/32.0 (penicillin-intermediate isolates), and 2.0/>128.0 (penicillin-resistant isolates). Against 28 strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of >/=8 microg/ml, gemifloxacin had the lowest MICs (0.03 to 1.0 microg/ml; MIC(90), 0.5 microg/ml), compared with MICs ranging between 0.25 and >32.0 microg/ml (MIC(90)s of 4.0 to >32.0 microg/ml) for other quinolones. Resistance in these 28 strains was associated with mutations in parC, gyrA, parE, and/or gyrB or efflux, with some strains having multiple resistance mechanisms. For 12 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococcal strains (2 quinolone resistant), time-kill results showed that levofloxacin at the MIC, gemifloxacin and sparfloxacin at two times the MIC, and ciprofloxacin, grepafloxacin, and trovafloxacin at four times the MIC were bactericidal for all strains after 24 h. Gemifloxacin was uniformly bactericidal after 24 h at </=0.5 microg/ml. Various degrees of 90 and 99% killing by all quinolones were detected after 3 h. Gemifloxacin and trovafloxacin were both bactericidal at two times the MIC for the two quinolone-resistant pneumococci. Amoxicillin at two times the MIC and cefuroxime at four times the MIC were uniformly bactericidal after 24 h, with some degree of killing at earlier time points. Macrolides gave slower killing against the seven susceptible strains tested, with 99.9% killing of all strains at two to four times the MIC after 24 h. PAEs for five quinolone-susceptible strains were similar (0.3 to 3.0 h) for all quinolones, and significant quinolone PAEs were found for the quinolone-resistant strain.

Antimicrobial activity evaluations of gatifloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone: contemporary pathogen results from a global antimicrobial resistance surveillance program (SENTRY, 1997)

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the in vitro potency and spectrum of activity of gatifloxacin and five comparator fluoroquinolones tested against over 23 000 clinical isolates from diverse geographic and clinical sources in the Americas. METHODS: Gram-negative, Gram-positive and fastidious bacterial isolates were tested against gatifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin using broth microdilution methods recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). RESULTS: Gatifloxacin demonstrated a potency and spectrum very similar to those of other new fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and trovafloxacin. Gatifloxacin was particularly active against the Enterobacteriaceae (94.8% susceptible at </=2 mg/L), Acinetobacter spp. (77.2%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (75.1%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (99.8%), other Streptococcus spp. (>/=98.9%), and various Staphylococcus spp. (79.2-100.0%). Trovafloxacin was the most similar comparison drug overall. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate a potential therapeutic role for gatifloxacin that would widen the potency or spectrum of fluoroquinolones, particularly against Gram-positive species, when considering its favorable bioavailability.

A review of worldwide experience with sparfloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

The worldwide occurrence of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) shows an undiminished prevalence of this serious illness and hospitalisation is common in those patients with severe illness. The diversity of bacterial pathogens that can act as aetiologic agents presents a challenge to initial empiric antimicrobial management. In recent years, treatment has been further complicated by an increased incidence of antibiotic resistance in pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. The newly available fluoroquinolones including sparfloxacin offer an alternative approach to empiric management. Sparfloxacin is active against many typical and atypical pathogens, as well as strains resistant to conventional agents. In comparative studies, the in vitro potency of sparfloxacin and its pharmacokinetic profile have been confirmed. The clinical trial efficacy and safety data suggest it might be a useful empiric therapy for both CAP and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

Bactericidal activity of quinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae by time-kill methodology

The increase in Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to the drugs traditionally used in treatment has made the search for alternative agents necessary. We studied the bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and trovafloxacin against six penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains, using time-kill methodology. Our results indicate that trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin had greater bactericidal activity than ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin against all the strains tested, since these two quinolones showed bactericidal activity against all six strains at concentrations of not more than 4 mg/l. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin did not have bactericidal activity, in the range of concentrations of antibiotics used, against any of the strains studied; when such activity did exist, the concentration of antibiotic used was higher.

Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae

An in-vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to compare the pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against four penicillin-susceptible and four penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Logarithmic-phase cultures were exposed to the peak concentrations of levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin observed in human serum after 500 mg and 750 mg oral doses, human elimination pharmacokinetics were simulated, and viable bacterial counts were measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 36 h. Levofloxacin was rapidly and significantly bactericidal against all eight strains evaluated, with eradication of six strains occurring despite area under the inhibitory curve over 24 h (AUIC24) values of only 32-64 SIT(-1) x h (serum inhibitory titre over time). The pharmacodynamics of ciprofloxacin were more variable and the rate of bacterial killing was consistently slower than observed with levofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin eradicated five strains despite having an AUIC24 of only 44 SIT(-1) x h. These data suggest that the increased potency of levofloxacin and more favourable pharmacokinetics compared with ciprofloxacin provide enhanced pharmacodynamic activity against S. pneumoniae. Furthermore, these data suggest that the minimum AUIC required for clinical efficacy against and eradication of S. pneumoniae with levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin may be well below the 125 SIT(-1) x h identified by other studies.

Antipneumococcal activities of levofloxacin and clarithromycin as determined by agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methodologies

The activities of levofloxacin and clarithromycin against 199 penicillin- and macrolide-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci were tested by agar and microdilution methods in air and by disk diffusion and E-test methods in air and CO2. For levofloxacin, >/=99. 0% of strains were susceptible at /=17 mm, regardless of incubation in air or CO2. Although zone sizes were smaller and E-test MICs were higher for clarithromycin in CO2 than those in air, category differences were minor, and susceptibility rates for clarithromycin were similar to those obtained by agar and microdilution in air (range, 76.9 to 80.9% by all methods). For clarithromycin, adjustment of breakpoints based upon distribution of results resulted in susceptibility rates which were similar by all methods (75.8 to 76.9% susceptible, 0 to 1.5% intermediate, 22.6 to 23.1% resistant). Minor discrepancies were obtained with levofloxacin for one strain (0.5%) by microdilution and two strains (1.0%) by disk diffusion in CO2. For clarithromycin, minor discrepancies were found in three strains (1.5%) by microdilution, seven strains (3.5%) by agar dilution, four strains (2.0%) by E-test in air, six strains (3.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and five strains (2.5%) by disk diffusion in CO2. Major discrepancies occurred with levofloxacin in one strain (0.5%) by microdilution but were not found with clarithromycin. Very major discrepancies were not seen with levofloxacin, but occurred with clarithromycin in five strains (2.5%) by microdilution, three strains (1.5%) by agar dilution, two strains (1.0%) by E-test in air, eight strains (4.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and one strain (0.5%) by disk diffusion in CO2.

Management of infections due to antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Antibiotic-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae are becoming more prevalent throughout the world; this has resulted in modifications of treatment approaches. Management of bacterial meningitis has the greatest consensus. Strategies for treating other systemic infections such as pneumonia, bacteremia, and musculoskeletal infections are evolving, in part related to the availability of new antibiotics which are active in vitro against isolates resistant to penicillin and the extended-spectrum cephalosporins. However, there are currently very limited data related to the clinical efficacy of these new agents. The studies upon which current recommendations are based are reviewed. Otitis media represents the single most common infection due to S. pneumoniae. Recommendations for treatment of acute otitis media due to drug-resistant strains and the rationale for these recommendations are discussed.

Postantibiotic effect and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of levofloxacin compared to those of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 20 pneumococci

The postantibiotic effect (PAE) (10 times the MIC of quinolones, 5 times the MIC of macrolides) and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect (PAE-SME) at 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 times the MIC were determined for levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 20 pneumococci. Quinolone PAEs ranged between 0.5 and 6.5 h, and macrolide PAEs ranged between 1 and 6 h. Measurable PAE-SMEs (in hours) at the three concentrations were 1 to 5, 1 to 8, and 1 to 8, respectively, for quinolones and 1 to 8, 1 to 8, and 1 to 6, respectively, for macrolides.

Bactericidal effects of levofloxacin in comparison with those of ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the in vitro activity of levofloxacin with the activities of ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin. METHODS: The following experiments were performed: (1) comparative studies of the rate of killing by the three quinolones of different strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae at a concentration corresponding to the 1-h serum level following a 500-mg dose in humans; (2) comparative studies of the rate of killing by levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin of different strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the same concentrations as above; (3) comparative studies of the rate of killing by levofloxacin at four different concentrations of reference and clinical strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. RESULTS: Levofloxacin exhibited statistically significantly higher bactericidal activity than sparfloxacin after 2 and/or 3 h against all strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Compared to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin showed a statistically significantly higher bactericidal activity after 2 and/or 3 h against all strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae except the one resistant to both penicillin and cefotaxime. No differences in killing rate between levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were seen against Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, with almost complete killing after 3 h of the P. aeruginosa strains and after 6 h for the E. coli strains. No concentration-dependent killing was seen at concentrations above 4xMIC of levofloxacin against Staphyloccus aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin was shown to be active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In terms of MIC values, ciprofloxacin was the most active drug against the Gram-negative organisms, and sparfloxacin against the strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, but levofloxacin exhibited a similar or even better bactericidal activity against the investigated strains compared with the other two fluoroquinolones when killing curves were compared.

Antipneumococcal activity of grepafloxacin compared to that of other agents by time-kill methodology

Time-kill studies compared the activities of grepafloxacin with those of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and clarithromycin against 12 pneumococcal strains. Grepafloxacin was bactericidal after 24 h against all strains at a concentration of < or = 0.5 microg/ml, while sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were bactericidal at concentrations of < or = 1.0, < or = 2.0, and < or = 8.0 microg/ml, respectively. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and clarithromycin were bactericidal at 2x the MIC after 24 h against 12 of 12 strains and against all 8 macrolide-susceptible strains, respectively.

Timed kill kinetic studies of levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against Moraxella catarrhalis

Levofloxacin bactericidal activity was compared to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against 10 strains of Moraxella catarrhalis. The cidal action (by kill-curve analysis) was slightly more rapid for levofloxacin, but all tested fluoroquinolones were considered bactericidal for all strains tested, including those producing BRO-1 and 2 beta-lactamases.

Streptococcus pneumoniae killing rate and post-antibiotic effect of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin

In vitro killing rates for levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for six strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae were determined by the time-kill method outlined by the NCCLS. Both drugs were bactericidal at concentrations of two and four times their respective minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Levofloxacin achieved a 99.9% kill on average in 1 hour more rapidly than ciprofloxacin. Post-antibiotic effect was also determined for both drugs against the same six strains. A post-antibiotic effect for a mean of 1.2 and 1.0 hours was observed for levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. The latter means were not considered significantly different.

In vitro synergism between cefotaxime and minocycline against Vibrio vulnificus

We conducted time-kill studies to evaluate the inhibitory activities of either cefotaxime or minocycline alone and the two drugs in combination against a clinical strain of Vibrio vulnificus. The MICs of cefotaxime and minocycline were 0.03 and 0.06 microg/ml, respectively. When approximately 5 x 10(5) CFU of V. vulnificus per ml was incubated with cefotaxime at 0.03 or 0.05 microg/ml, the bacterial growth was inhibited during the initial 2 and 8 h, respectively. Thereafter, V. vulnificus regrew and the level of growth reached that of the control. Within the dose range of less than five times the MIC, the duration of the inhibitory effect of cefotaxime was proportional to its concentration. When minocycline at 0.015, 0.03, 0.045, and 0.06 microg/ml was used to evaluate the inhibitory effect, a similar trend was observed. Either antibiotic at a concentration of five times the MIC or greater prevented the regrowth of V. vulnificus for at least 48 h. When cefotaxime at 0.05 microg/ml and minocycline at 0.045 microg/ml were combined in the same culture, the inhibitory effect against V. vulnificus persisted for more than 48 h, with no regrowth noted. The use of a combination of these two antibiotics resulted in the reduction of growth by 6 orders of magnitude compared to the use of either of the two antibiotics alone, and the number of surviving organisms in the presence of the antibiotics combined was approximately 3 orders of magnitude less than that in the starting inoculum. We conclude that cefotaxime and minocycline acted synergistically in inhibiting V. vulnificus in vitro.

Susceptibility of twenty penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin by MIC and time-kill

This study uses MIC and time-kill methodology to examine the antipneumococcal activity of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 20 pneumococci. Ten strains had levofloxacin MICs of 1.0 microgram/ml, and ten levofloxacin MICs of 2.0 micrograms/ml. Five strains in each group were macrolide susceptible, and five were macrolide resistant. MICs for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin ranged from 0.5 to 4.0 micrograms/ml and 1.0 to 8.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. MICs of erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin were similar for macrolide susceptible strains, ranging between 0.004 to 0.06 microgram/ml, and were > or = 128.0 micrograms/ml for macrolide resistant strains. The three quinolones were bactericidal (99.9% killing) for all macrolide-susceptible strains at 2 x MIC at 24 h. The three quinolones yielded 99% killing of all strains after 12 h at 2 x MIC, and 90% killing of all strains after 6 h at the MIC of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin and 2 x MIC for ofloxacin. Levofloxacin yielded 90% killing of all strains after 4 h at 2 x MIC and ofloxacin at 4 x MIC. For macrolide-susceptible strains, erythromycin and clarithromycin were bactericidal for 9 of 10 strains after 24 h at 4 x and 2 x MIC, respectively, and azithromycin was bactericidal after 24 h at 2 x MIC for 8 of 10 strains. All three macrolides were bactericidal after 12 h only, while 90% killing occurred in 9 of 10 strains at 8 x MIC after 6 h. Quinolone kill kinetics were similar for the 10 macrolide-resistant strains. For macrolide-resistant strains, at 64 to 128.0 micrograms/ml, virtually no decrease in count was seen, with no bactericidal effect.

Comparison of the postantibiotic and postantibiotic sub-MIC effects of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin on Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae

The postantibiotic subminimum inhibitory concentration effect (PA SME) may simulate in vivo drug exposure more accurately than the postantibiotic effect (PAE) since subinhibitory concentrations of drug persist between antibiotic dosings. In this study, we compared the PAEs and PA SMEs of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for clinical isolates of fluoroquinolone-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. At two times the MIC, PAEs of levofloxacin were an average of 0.6 h longer than the PAEs obtained for ciprofloxacin for methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains. The PAEs of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ranged from 1.8 to 3.1 and 1.1 to 2.4 h, respectively. Continued exposure of the methicillin-resistant strain to 1/16, 1/8, and 1/4 the MIC resulted in PA SMEs of 6.5, 15.3, and >22.3 h, respectively, for levofloxacin and 3.8, 8.0, and 12.3 h, respectively, for ciprofloxacin. For isolates of S. pneumoniae, at two times the MIC of both fluoroquinolones, the average PAEs of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equivalent: 1.3 h for the penicillin-susceptible isolate and 0.6 h for the penicillin-resistant isolate. Continued exposure of the penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae strain to 1/16, 1/8, and 1/4 the MIC resulted in average PA SMEs of 1.0, 1.4, and 2.8 h, respectively, for levofloxacin and 1.8, 2.0, and 2.5 h, respectively, for ciprofloxacin. Continued exposure of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae to 1/16, 1/8, and 1/4 the MIC of the same fluoroquinolones resulted in average PA SMEs of 0.6, 1.1, and 2.9 h, respectively, for levofloxacin and 0.6, 1.1, and 1.5 h, respectively, for ciprofloxacin. The PA SMEs observed demonstrate the superior activity of levofloxacin against methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Although PAEs were similar for the penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains, the PA SME of levofloxacin at one-fourth the MIC was longer for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae.

Bactericidal activity of DU-6859a compared to activities of three quinolones, three beta-lactams, clindamycin, and metronidazole against anaerobes as determined by time-kill methodology

The activities of DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 11 anaerobes were tested by the broth microdilution and time-kill methods. DU-6859a was the most active drug tested (broth microdilution MICs, 0.06 to 0.5 microg/ml), followed by imipenem (MICs, 0.002 to 4.0 microg/ml). Broth macrodilution MICs were within 3 (but usually 1) dilutions of the broth microdilution MICs. All compounds were bactericidal at the MIC after 48 h; after 24 h, 90% killing was shown for all strains when the compounds were used at four times the MIC. DU-6859a at < or = 0.5 microg/ml was bactericidal after 48 h.

Trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae

An in vitro study of the activity of 15 antibacterial agents against 202 recent pediatric isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from urban and rural Nebraska and rural Kentucky identified trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, clindamycin, and vancomycin as the most active agents and equally active against both penicillin-susceptible and--resistant strains. In contrast, six beta-lactams, three macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were less active overall, especially against penicillin-intermediate and--resistant strains. Trovafloxacin inhibited all strains at a concentration of < or = 0.25 micrograms/ml and was 8- to 16-fold more potent than ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin.

MIC and time-kill studies of antipneumococcal activity of GV 118819X (sanfetrinem) compared with those of other agents

Agar dilution MIC methodology was used to test the activities of GV 118819X (sanfetrinem), ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefpodoxime, loracarbef, levofloxacin, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, imipenem, and vancomycin against 53 penicillin-susceptible, 84 penicillin-intermediate and 74 penicillin-resistant pneumococci isolated in the United States. GV 118819X was the most active oral beta-lactam, with MIC at which 50% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC50)/MIC90 values of 0.008/0.03, 0.06/0.5, and 0.5/1.0 micrograms/ml against penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant stains, respectively. Amoxicillin and amoxicillin in the presence of clavulanate (2:1) were the second most-active oral beta-lactams, followed by ampicillin and cefpodoxime; loracarbef was not active against penicillin-intermediate and -resistant strains. Clarithromycin was most active against penicillin-susceptible strains but was less active against intermediate and resistant stains. All pneumococcal stains were inhibited by ceftriaxone and imipenem at MICs of < or = 4.0 and < or = 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. The activities of levofloxacin and vancomycin were unaffected by penicillin susceptibility. Time-kill studies of three penicillin-susceptible, three penicillin-intermediate, and three penicillin-resistant pneumococci showed that all compounds, at the broth microdilution MIC, yielded 99.9% killing of all strains after 24 h. Kinetic patterns of all oral beta-lactams, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin were similar relative to the MIC, with 90% killing of all strains first observed after 12 h. However, killing by amoxicillin-clavulanate, imipenem, and levofloxacin was slightly faster and that by clarithromycin was slower than that by the above-described drugs. At 2 x the MIC, more strains were killed earlier than was the case at the MIC, but the pattern seen at the MIC prevailed. When MICs and kill kinetics were combined, sanfetrinem was the most active oral antipneumococcal agent in this study.

MIC and time-kill study of antipneumococcal activities of RPR 106972 (a new oral streptogramin), RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin), pyostacine (RP 7293), penicillin G, cefotaxime, erythromycin, and clarithromycin against 10 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci

Broth MICs and time-kill studies were used to test the activity of RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin), RPR 106972, pyostacine (RP 7293), erythromycin, clarithromycin, and cefotaxime for four penicillin-susceptible (MICs of 0.008 to 0.03 microgram/ml), two penicillin-intermediate (MIC of 0.25 microgram/ml), and four penicillin-resistant (MIC of 2.0 to 4.0 micrograms/ml) strains of pneumococci: 6 of 10 strains were resistant to macrolides (MICs of > or = 0.5 microgram/ml). MICs of RP 59500 (0.5 to 1.0 microgram/ml), RPR 106972 (0.125 to 0.25 microgram/ml), and pyostacine (0.125 to 0.25 microgram/ml) did not alter with the strain's penicillin or macrolide susceptibility status. Three penicillin-susceptible strains and one penicillin-intermediate strain were susceptible to macrolides (MICs of < or = 0.25 microgram/ml); the macrolide MICs for the remaining strains were > or = 4.0 micrograms/ml. Cefotaxime MICs rose with those of penicillin G, but all strains were inhibited at MICs of < or = 2.0 micrograms/ml. RP 59500 was bactericidal for all strains after 24 h at 2 x MIC and yielded 90% killing of all strains at 6 h at 2 x MIC; at 8 x MIC, RP 59500 showed 90% killing of six strains within 10 min (approximately 0.2 h). In comparison, RPR 106972 was bactericidal for 9 of 10 strains at 2 x MIC after 24 h and yielded 90% killing of all strains at 2 x MIC after 6 h; 90% killing of six strains was found at 8 x MIC at 0.2 h. Results for pyostacine were similar to those of RPR 106972. Erythromycin and clarithromycin were bactericidal for three of four macrolide-susceptible strains after 24 h at 4 x MIC. Clarithromycin yielded 90% killing of three strains at 8 x MIC after 12 h. Cefotaxime was bactericidal for all strains after 24 h at 4 x MIC, yielding 90% killing of all strains after 6 h at 4 x MIC. All three streptogramins yielded rapid killing of penicillin- and erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci and were the only compounds which killed significant numbers of strains at 0.2 h.