Development and evaluation of a Bayesian pharmacokinetic estimator and optimal, sparse sampling strategies for ceftazidime

Physicochemical Characteristics of Antimicrobials and Practical Recommendations for Intravenous Administration: A Systematic Review

Most antimicrobial drugs need an intravenous (IV) administration to achieve maximum efficacy against target pathogens. IV administration is related to complications, such as tissue infiltration and thrombo-phlebitis. This systematic review aims to provide practical recommendations about diluent, pH, osmolarity, dosage, infusion rate, vesicant properties, and phlebitis rate of the most commonly used antimicrobial drugs evaluated in randomized controlled studies (RCT) till 31 March 2023. The authors searched for available IV antimicrobial drugs in RCT in PUBMED EMBASE®, EBSCO® CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials. Drugs' chemical features were searched online, in drug data sheets, and in scientific papers, establishing that the drugs with a pH of <5 or >9, osmolarity >600 mOsm/L, high incidence of phlebitis reported in the literature, and vesicant drugs need the adoption of utmost caution during administration. We evaluated 931 papers; 232 studies were included. A total of 82 antimicrobials were identified. Regarding antibiotics, 37 reach the "caution" criterion, as well as seven antivirals, 10 antifungals, and three antiprotozoals. In this subgroup of antimicrobials, the correct vascular access device (VAD) selection is essential to avoid complications due to the administration through a peripheral vein. Knowing the physicochemical characteristics of antimicrobials is crucial to improve the patient's safety significantly, thus avoiding administration errors and local side effects.

Mathematical modeling and simulation in animal health. Part III: Using nonlinear mixed-effects to characterize and quantify variability in drug pharmacokinetics

A common feature of human and veterinary pharmacokinetics is the importance of identifying and quantifying the key determinants of between-patient variability in drug disposition and effects. Some of these attributes are already well known to the field of human pharmacology such as bodyweight, age, or sex, while others are more specific to veterinary medicine, such as species, breed, and social behavior. Identification of these attributes has the potential to allow a better and more tailored use of therapeutic drugs both in companion and food-producing animals. Nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) have been purposely designed to characterize the sources of variability in drug disposition and response. The NLME approach can be used to explore the impact of population-associated variables on the relationship between drug administration, systemic exposure, and the levels of drug residues in tissues. The latter, while different from the method used by the US Food and Drug Administration for setting official withdrawal times (WT) can also be beneficial for estimating WT of approved animal drug products when used in an extralabel manner. Finally, NLME can also prove useful to optimize dosing schedules, or to analyze sparse data collected in situations where intensive blood collection is technically challenging, as in small animal species presenting limited blood volume such as poultry and fish.

Population pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2566 in healthy subjects

NNZ-2566 is a novel, small molecule being developed as a treatment for cognitive impairment in different CNS conditions, including Rett and Fragile-X syndrome, both of which are associated with moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disorder. In the current study we characterise the population pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2566 after administration of single and repeated ascending doses to healthy subjects. A meta-analytical approach was used to analyse pharmacokinetic data from 3 different studies, in which a total of 61 healthy subjects (median age: 23years, range: 19 to 38) were treated with NNZ-2566. Doses of NNZ-2566 ranged from 6.0 to 100mg/kg after oral administration and from 0.1 to 30mg/kg after intravenous administration. A two-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination was found to best describe the pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2566. Inter-individual variability was identified in clearance, absorption rate, central volume of distribution, peripheral volume of distribution and inter-compartmental clearance. Population predicted clearance and central volume of distribution were 10.35L/h and 20.23L, respectively. Dose proportionality was observed across the dose range evaluated in healthy subjects. No accumulation, metabolic inhibition or induction was observed during the course of treatment. In addition, oral bioavailability appeared to vary with food intake. The relatively short half-life of 1.4h suggests the need for a twice or three times daily regimen to maintain relevant blood levels of NNZ-2566.

Limited-sampling strategies for anti-infective agents: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is a pharmacokinetic parameter that represents overall exposure to a drug. For selected anti-infective agents, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters, such as AUC/MIC (where MIC is the minimal inhibitory concentration), have been correlated with outcome in a few studies. A limited-sampling strategy may be used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUC, without the frequent, costly, and inconvenient blood sampling that would be required to directly calculate the AUC.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss, by means of a systematic review, the strengths, limitations, and clinical implications of published studies involving a limited-sampling strategy for anti-infective agents and to propose improvements in methodology for future studies.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched using the terms "anti-infective agents", "limited sampling", "optimal sampling", "sparse sampling", "AUC monitoring", "abbreviated AUC", "abbreviated sampling", and "Bayesian". The reference lists of retrieved articles were searched manually. Included studies were classified according to modified criteria from the US Preventive Services Task Force.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Six of the studies (involving didanosine, zidovudine, nevirapine, ciprofloxacin, efavirenz, and nelfinavir) were classified as providing level I evidence, 4 studies (involving vancomycin, didanosine, lamivudine, and lopinavir-ritonavir) provided level II-1 evidence, 2 studies (involving saquinavir and ceftazidime) provided level II-2 evidence, and 8 studies (involving ciprofloxacin, nelfinavir, vancomycin, ceftazidime, ganciclovir, pyrazinamide, meropenem, and alpha interferon) provided level III evidence. All of the studies providing level I evidence used prospectively collected data and proper validation procedures with separate, randomly selected index and validation groups. However, most of the included studies did not provide an adequate description of the methods or the characteristics of included patients, which limited their generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Many limited-sampling strategies have been developed for anti-infective agents that do not have a clearly established link between AUC and clinical outcomes in humans. Future studies should first determine if there is an association between AUC monitoring and clinical outcomes. Thereafter, it may be worthwhile to prospectively develop and validate a limited-sampling strategy for the particular anti-infective agent in a similar population.

Assessment of renal function in clinical practice at the bedside of burn patients

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

* In burn patients it has been shown ([2]), that there is a correlation between the creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) and the clearance of inulin. * The CL(CR) has never been studied in burn patients who have normal serum creatinine. * The Robert, Kirkpatrick and sMDRD formulae have never been evaluated in burn patients.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

* Despite burn patients having normal serum creatinine concentrations, the study showed that there are large variations in CL(CR) which cannot be detected by single serum creatinine measurements, and which have important implications for drug therapy. * It showed that the formulae currently used to calculate creatinine clearance on the basis of serum creatinine are inadequate for use in burn patients, and they should be abandoned in favour of direct measurement from a 24 h urine collection.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the renal function of burn patients could be correctly assessed using a single serum creatinine measurement, within normal limits, and three prediction equations of glomerular filtration taking into account, serum creatinine, age, weight and sex.

METHODS

This was a prospective study comprising 36 adult burn patients with a serum creatinine <120 micromol l(-1), within the second or third week following the burn injury. Renal function was assessed using serum creatinine, 24 h urinary CL(CR), and the Cockcroft-Gault, Robert, Kirkpatrick and simplified MDRD equations.

RESULTS

Despite normal serum creatinine concentrations in all patients, a significant number had a decreased CL(CR). The urinary CL(CR) was <80 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) in nine patients (25%), and <60 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) in five patients (14%). Between the groups having a CL(CR) lower or greater than 80 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) there were no differences in gender, burn indices, percentage of mechanically ventilated patients or length of hospital stay, but a difference in age. The highest CL(CR) (>140 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2)) was found in 13 patients younger than 40 years. Regression analysis, residual and Bland-Altman plots revealed that neither the Cockcroft-Gault, Robert, Kirkpatrick nor sMDRD equations were specific enough for the assessment of renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

In burn patients with normal serum creatinine during the hypermetabolic phase, serum creatinine and creatine based predictive equations are imprecise in assessing renal function.

Evaluation of antiangiogenic treatment effects on tumors' microcirculation by Bayesian physiological pharmacokinetic modeling and magnetic resonance imaging

A physiological pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to estimate tumor microcirculation in nude mice with a grafted tumor. The kinetics of a rapid clearance blood pool agent, Vistarem, were investigated by dynamic MRI after bolus administration. Signal enhancements were recorded in arterial blood and in tumor tissue. To analyze these data, we developed a whole-body mathematical model of the agent's biodistribution using physiological parameters. The model included six compartments: arterial and venous plasma, tumor (split into capillaries and interstitium), and the rest of the body (also split into capillaries and interstitium). As an application, changes in tumor microcirculation parameters were evaluated in mice receiving either an antiangiogenic treatment (ZD4190) or a placebo. The analysis was performed in a Bayesian framework, and the model was fitted to experimental data using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. Results showed a significant difference in tumor microcirculation between the two groups of mice when the microcirculation parameters are considered together. This whole-body physiological model enables to analyze jointly data in tumor tissue and in arterial blood. This leads to accurate estimates of microcirculation parameters and the evaluation of their uncertainty.

An integrated pharmacoeconomic approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making

PURPOSE

The utility of a novel interdisciplinary approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making was studied.

METHODS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution data for cefepime and ceftazidime were retrieved from nonrepeat isolates obtained from November 2002 to October 2003. Unbound drug exposures were simulated for 5000 patients using the Monte Carlo method. Weighted target attainment rates (TARs) were calculated for cefepime and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours and 1 g every 12 hours (infused over 0.5, 2, and 4 hours), using three representative pharmacodynamic targets (percentage of time above the MIC of 67%, 100%, and 400%).

RESULTS

MIC data for 1230 nonrepeat P. aeruginosa were analyzed. The MIC at which 90% of the P. aeruginosa isolates were inhibited was 16 and 32 mg/L for cefepime and ceftazidime, respectively. Drug acquisition cost was the highest with cefepime 1 g given every 8 hours (37.56 dollars/day), followed by cefepime 1 g every 12 hours (25.04 dollars/day) and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours (22.26 dollars/day). When infused over 0.5 hour, the highest TAR was achieved with cefepime 1 g every 8 hours (82%), followed by ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours (77%) and cefepime 1 g every 12 hours (66%); ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours was 70% more cost-effective than cefepime 1 g every 8 hours. Cefepime 1 g every 12 hours, infused over 4 hours, increased the TAR to 89% and was similar in cost-effectiveness to ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours infused over 0.5 hour.

CONCLUSION

An integrated pharmacoeconomic approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making addressed local resistance patterns, population pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing regimens, and drug acquisition costs. This method appeared to be more realistic and objective than the conventional approach of considering only drug acquisition costs, especially for agents in a similar structural or functional class.

Use of a chemical probe to increase safety for human volunteers in toxicokinetic studies

To avoid interspecies extrapolation in toxicokinetics and drug development, it is convenient to directly develop human data. In that case, exposure dose should pose null or negligible risk to the exposed individual, but still be sufficiently high to allow quantification. We propose to reduce the dose received by human volunteers during exposure, and to compensate for loss of information by exposing the same volunteers to a nontoxic agent. This method was applied to develop 1,3-butadiene (BD) exposure protocols for humans. To study the potential of such a procedure, we worked with simulated data. Three exposure times (20, 10, and 5 minutes) and four exposure concentrations (2, 1, 0.8, and 0.5 ppm) were used to define 12 inhalation exposure scenarios for BD. Isoflurane was used as a probe, with simulated exposure of 20 subjects to 20 ppm isoflurane during 15 minutes. Isoflurane or BD-exhaled air concentrations were supposed to be measured 10 times. A three-compartment physiological toxicokinetic model was used to jointly describe BD and isoflurane data. For each subject, BD data were analyzed, in a Bayesian framework, either alone or together with the isoflurane data. The precision of BD metabolic rate constant or fraction metabolized was increased, and bias reduced, when BD and probe data were considered jointly. An exposure to 10 ppm x min BD and 300 ppm x min isoflurane gave equivalent precision and bias as a unique exposure to 40 ppm x min BD. The BD dose received by volunteers could therefore be at least quartered if BD exposure was supplemented with that of a probe.

Determination of ceftazidime in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid by micellar electrokinetic chromatography with direct sample injection

A simple micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) with UV detection at 254 nm for analysis of ceftazidime in plasma and in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by direct injection without any sample pretreatment is described. The separation of ceftazidime from biological matrix was performed at 25 degrees C using a background electrolyte consisting of Tris buffer with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as the electrolyte solution. Under optimal MEKC condition, good separation with high efficiency and short analyses time is achieved. Several parameters affecting the separation of the drug from biological matrix were studied, including pH and concentration of the Tris buffer and SDS. Using cefazolin as an internal standard (IS), the linear ranges of the method for the determination of ceftazidime in plasma and in CSF were all over the range of 3-90 microg/mL; the detection limit of the drug in plasma and in CSF (signal-to-noise ratio = 3; injection 0.5 psi, 5 s) was 2.0 microg/mL. The applicability of the proposed method for determination of ceftazidime in plasma and CSF collected after intravenous administration of 2 g ceftazidime in patients with meningitis was demonstrated.

Population pharmacokinetics of flucytosine: comparison and validation of three models using STS, NPEM, and NONMEM

The objective of this study is to compare and validate three models of flucytosine (5-FC) population pharmacokinetics using three methods of analysis to elucidate which model describes 5-FC pharmacokinetics most accurately and which method is the most suitable for this purpose. Retrospectively, demographic and clinical data of two similar sets of a total of 88 intensive care unit (ICU) patients were gathered for calculation and validation of 5-FC pharmacokinetics respectively. Three pharmacokinetic models were analyzed: a one-compartment with renal elimination (renal model), a one-compartment with renal and metabolic elimination (mixed model), and a two-compartment with renal elimination (two-compartment model). Population pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the standard two-stage method (STS), NONMEM, and NPEM. Furthermore, a covariate model was built by NONMEM. Validation of the 10 calculated pharmacokinetic models showed that NONMEM is most suitable for predicting 5-FC population pharmacokinetics. Based upon AIC values, bias and precision, the best results are obtained using a two-compartment model with renal elimination (k(elr) = 0.000858 +/- 0.000143 l/h per mL per min, k12 = 0.0313 +/- 0.0168 h(-1), k21 = 0.0353 +/- 0.0145 h(-1), and Vd = 0.541 +/- 0.084 L/kg; bias = -13.16; 95% CI = -16.77; -9.55; precision = 30.50; 95% CI = 27.47; 33.26) or a two-compartment covariate model as built by NONMEM [Vd (L) = 0.572 x WT, Cl(5FC) (L/h) = 1.69 + 0.0273 x (Cl(cr) (mL/min) - 52.5), k12 = 0.0235 +/- 0.0107 h(-1), and k21 = 0.0375 +/- 0.0147 h(-1); bias = -8.29; 95% CI = -11.63; -4.95; precision = 26.77; 95% CI = 24.24; 29.07]. In conclusion, this study shows that a two-compartment model with renal elimination best describes 5-FC population pharmacokinetics and NONMEM is able to build a two-compartment covariate model that predicts 5-FC levels equally well in our population of ICU patients. Furthermore, NONMEM appeared to be the most suitable method of population pharmacokinetics in our population and for this purpose it offers more reliable and accurate results than NPEM or the STS method.

Population pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion ceftazidime

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a model that predicts clearance and steady-state ceftazidime concentrations during continuous infusion.

DESIGN

This was a prospective clinical observational trial. Two models describing drug clearance during the continuous infusion of ceftazidime to infected patients were developed. The first model included inter- and intraindividual variability (IIV) while the second extended the first model by including interoccasional variability (IOV).

SETTING

This was a study of patients in a US hospital between January and June 1996.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

The analysis included 39 patients aged > 18 years with infections at various sites.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received ceftazidime as either a 1000 or 2000mg loading dose followed by a continuous infusion of 1000 to 4000 mg/day. Serum samples were collected under approximate steady-state conditions and ceftazidime concentrations were analysed using high performance liquid chromatography. The models were fitted to the data using a nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the NONMEM program.

RESULTS

75 serum concentration measurements were included in the analysis. The routinely available clinical variables bodyweight, age, gender and serum creatinine were found to be statistically independent predictors of ceftazidime clearance. The IIV model was cross validated yielding a mean prediction error (with a 95% confidence interval) of -0.51 mg/L (-2.5 to 1.4 mg/L) and a mean absolute prediction error of 6.5 mg/L (5.3 to 7.8 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

We have developed and validated a model to estimate ceftazidime concentrations during continuous infusion using commonly available clinical information. Additional work is needed to compare outcomes of patients receiving continuous and intermittently administered ceftazidime, and to define the optimal target steady-state ceftazidime concentrations during continuous infusion.

Determination of ceftazidime in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection. Application for individualizing dosage regimens in elderly patients

This study describes a sensitive HPLC-electrochemical detection method for the analysis of ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin, in human plasma. The extraction procedure involved protein precipitation with 30% trichloroacetic acid. The separation was achieved on a reversed-phase column (250X4.6 mm I.D., 5 microm) packed with C18 Kromasil with isocratic elution and a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile-25 mM KH2PO4-Na2HPO4 buffer, pH 7.4 (10:90, v/v). The proposed analytical method is selective, reproducible and reliable. The assay has a precision of 0.2-15.1% (C.V.) in the range of 5-200 microg mil(-1). (corresponding to 0.5 to 20 ng of ceftazidime injected onto the column), and is optimised for assaying 50 microl of plasma. The extraction recovery from plasma was approximately 100%. The method was highly specific for ceftazidime and there was no interference from either commonly administered drugs or endogenous compounds. This assay was used to measure ceftazidime in elderly patients for therapeutic drug monitoring.