Comparative activities of new fluoroquinolones, alone or in combination with amoxicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or rifampin, against intracellular Listeria monocytogenes

Treatment of Listeria monocytogenes bacteremia with oral levofloxacin in an immunocompromised patient

A 72-year-old woman presented with fever, malaise, and diarrhea. The patient was conscious, and was negative for meningeal signs on physical exam. Blood tests revealed elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count with neutrophil dominance. Suspecting a bacterial infection, empirical antimicrobial treatment with oral levofloxacin was initiated after collecting two sets of blood culture. On the 3rd day, the patient's fever resolved. On the 7th day, Listeria monocytogenes bacteremia was diagnosed with both blood cultures turning positive. On the 15th day, the patient's symptoms had improved. We ceased treatment when the CRP level decreased. Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive bacterium that causes serious infections in elderly and immunocompromised hosts. Penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, and gentamicin are recommended for the treatment of Listeria infections. It has been reported that new fluoroquinolones may be effective in vitro and in animal models. Although further evidence is required, new fluoroquinolones, especially levofloxacin, may provide an option for the treatment of Listeria infection.

Antagonistic effects of indoloquinazoline alkaloids on antimycobacterial activity of evocarpine

AIMS

The interaction of quinolone and indoloquinazoline alkaloids concerning their antimycobacterial activity was studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The antimycobacterial and modulating activity of evodiamine (1), rutaecarpine (2) and evocarpine (3) was tested on mycobacteria including three multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antagonistic effects were concluded from fractional inhibitory concentration (FICI) values. Interaction energies of the compounds were calculated using GLUE docking module implemented in GRID. 1 and 2 exhibited weak inhibition of rapidly growing mycobacteria, however, 1 was active against Myco. tuberculosis H37Rv (MIC = 10 mg l(-1) ) while 2 was inactive. Both 1 and 2 showed a marked antagonistic effect on the susceptibility of different mycobacterial strains to 3 giving FICI values between 5 and 9. The interaction energies between compounds 1 and 2 with compound 3 suggested the possibility of complex formation in solution.

CONCLUSIONS

Indoloquinazoline alkaloids markedly reduce the antimycobacterial effect of the quinolone alkaloid evocarpine. Complex formation may play a role in the attenuation of its antimycobacterial activity.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This study gives a striking example of antagonism between compounds present in the same plant extract which should be considered in natural product based screening projects.

Rapid eradication of Listeria monocytogenes by moxifloxacin in a murine model of central nervous system listeriosis

Listeriosis is a rare but life-threatening infection. A favorable outcome is greatly aided by early administration of antibiotics with rapid bactericidal activity against Listeria monocytogenes. Moxifloxacin, a new-generation fluoroquinolone with extended activity against gram-positive bacteria, has proved its effectiveness in vitro against intracellular reservoirs of bacteria. The efficacies of moxifloxacin and amoxicillin were compared in vivo by survival curve assays and by studying the kinetics of bacterial growth in blood and organs in a murine model of central nervous system (CNS) listeriosis. We combined pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approaches to correlate the observed efficacy in vivo with plasma and tissue moxifloxacin concentrations. Death was significantly delayed for animals treated with a single dose of moxifloxacin compared to a single dose of amoxicillin. We observed rapid bacterial clearance from blood and organs of animals treated with moxifloxacin. The decrease in the bacterial counts in blood and brain correlated with plasma and cerebral concentrations of antibiotic. Moxifloxacin peaked in the brain at 1.92 +/- 0.32 microg/g 1 hour after intraperitoneal injection. This suggests that moxifloxacin rapidly crosses the blood-brain barrier and diffuses into the cerebral parenchyma. Moreover, no resistant strains were selected during in vivo experiments. Our results indicate that moxifloxacin combines useful pharmacokinetic properties and rapid bactericidal activity and that it may be a valuable alternative for the treatment of CNS listeriosis.

Comparison of the in vitro efficacies of moxifloxacin and amoxicillin against Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular bacterium that causes severe infections associated with a high mortality rate. Moxifloxacin presents extended activity against gram-positive bacteria and has recently been suggested to be a potential alternative in the treatment of listeriosis. We evaluated the in vitro efficacy of moxifloxacin against L. monocytogenes using a combination of epidemiological and experimental approaches. The median MIC of moxifloxacin for a large collection of L. monocytogenes strains of various origins (human, food, and environment) was 0.5 microg/ml (MIC range, 0.064 to 1 microg/ml). No differences were observed, irrespective of the origin of the strains. Moreover, no cross-resistance with fluoroquinolones was detected in strains that have been reported to be resistant to ciprofloxacin. The in vitro activities of moxifloxacin and amoxicillin were compared by time-kill curve and inhibition of intracellular growth experiments by using a model of bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages infected by L. monocytogenes EGDe. Both moxifloxacin and amoxicillin were bactericidal in broth against extracellular forms of L. monocytogenes. However, moxifloxacin acted much more rapidly, beginning to exert its effects in the first 3 h and achieving complete broth sterilization within 24 h of incubation. Moxifloxacin has a rapid bactericidal effect against intracellular reservoirs of bacteria, whereas amoxicillin is only bacteriostatic and appears to prevent cellular lysis and the subsequent bacterial spreading to adjacent cells. No resistant bacteria were selected during the in vitro experiments. Taken together, our results suggest that moxifloxacin is an interesting alternative to the reference treatment, combining rapid and bactericidal activity, even against intracellular bacteria.

Comparison of the in vitro efficacies of moxifloxacin and amoxicillin against Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular bacterium that causes severe infections associated with a high mortality rate. Moxifloxacin presents extended activity against gram-positive bacteria and has recently been suggested to be a potential alternative in the treatment of listeriosis. We evaluated the in vitro efficacy of moxifloxacin against L. monocytogenes using a combination of epidemiological and experimental approaches. The median MIC of moxifloxacin for a large collection of L. monocytogenes strains of various origins (human, food, and environment) was 0.5 microg/ml (MIC range, 0.064 to 1 microg/ml). No differences were observed, irrespective of the origin of the strains. Moreover, no cross-resistance with fluoroquinolones was detected in strains that have been reported to be resistant to ciprofloxacin. The in vitro activities of moxifloxacin and amoxicillin were compared by time-kill curve and inhibition of intracellular growth experiments by using a model of bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages infected by L. monocytogenes EGDe. Both moxifloxacin and amoxicillin were bactericidal in broth against extracellular forms of L. monocytogenes. However, moxifloxacin acted much more rapidly, beginning to exert its effects in the first 3 h and achieving complete broth sterilization within 24 h of incubation. Moxifloxacin has a rapid bactericidal effect against intracellular reservoirs of bacteria, whereas amoxicillin is only bacteriostatic and appears to prevent cellular lysis and the subsequent bacterial spreading to adjacent cells. No resistant bacteria were selected during the in vitro experiments. Taken together, our results suggest that moxifloxacin is an interesting alternative to the reference treatment, combining rapid and bactericidal activity, even against intracellular bacteria.

An update on the medical management of listeriosis

It is still not quite well understood why there is no optimal or even a satisfactory antibiotic therapy for listeriosis. Although almost all Listeria strains that induce sepsis, meningitis and encephalitis, as well as many other manifestations--in particular, in immunocompromised individuals--are susceptible to most of the common antibiotics, the cure rate is only approximately 70%. The most effective regimen still consists of a combination of an aminopenicillin (amoxicillin or ampicillin) plus an aminoglycoside. In vitro, this combination is bactericidal, whereas aminopenicillin alone only exerts a weak bactericidal activity against Listeriae. These antibiotics only poorly penetrate the cerebrospinal fluid and thus, only high doses given over a prolonged period of 2-3 weeks are curative. Furthermore, Listeria monocytogenes belongs to the group of facultative intracellular bacteria, which means that a certain population is inaccessible for antibiotics. Theoretically, a drug which is endowed with bactericidal activity superior to that of ampicillin would be preferable. Furthermore, the candidate drug should easily cross the blood-brain barrier into the CNS, be able to accumulate within host cells, reach the cytoplasm and be active under these unusual conditions. Because of all these arguments, the new quinolones are of particular interest; but broad clinical data are still lacking. It is unclear as to whether antibiotics alone will be sufficient to increase the prognosis. Adjunctive therapy with immunomodulators, which are able to reconstitute the defective defence capacities, would presumably create the conditions necessary to finally resolve listeriosis.

Comparative activity of quinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and garenoxacin) against extracellular and intracellular infection by Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in J774 macrophages

OBJECTIVES

Quinolones accumulate in eukaryotic cells and show activity against a large array of intracellular organisms, but systematic studies aimed at examining their pharmacodynamic profile against intracellular bacteria are scarce. The present work aims at comparing intracellular-to-extracellular activities in this context.

METHODS

We assessed the activities of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and garenoxacin against the extracellular (broth) and intracellular (infected J774 macrophages) forms of Listeria monocytogenes (cytosolic infection) and Staphylococcus aureus (phagolysosomal infection) using a range of clinically meaningful extracellular concentrations (0.06-4 mg/L).

RESULTS

All four quinolones displayed concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against extracellular and intracellular L. monocytogenes and S. aureus for extracellular concentrations in the range 1-4-fold their MIC. Compared at equipotent extracellular concentrations, intracellular activities against L. monocytogenes were roughly equal to those that were extracellular, but were 50-100 times lower against S. aureus. Because quinolones accumulate in cells (ciprofloxacin, approximately 3 times; levofloxacin, approximately 5 times; garenoxacin, approximately 10 times, moxifloxacin, approximately 13 times), these data show that, intracellularly, quinolones are 5-10 times less potent against L. monocytogenes (P=0.065 [ANCOVA]), and at least 100 times less potent (P < 0.0001) against S. aureus. Because of their lower MICs and higher accumulation levels, garenoxacin and moxifloxacin were, however, more active than ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin when compared at similar extracellular concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinolone activity is reduced intracellulary. This suggests that either only a fraction of cell-associated quinolones exert an antibacterial effect, or that intracellular activity is defeated by the local environment, or that intracellular bacteria only poorly respond to the action of quinolones.

Active efflux of ciprofloxacin from J774 macrophages through an MRP-like transporter

The accumulation and efflux kinetics of ciprofloxacin have been examined by using murine J774 macrophages. Accumulation (at equilibrium) was increased (three- to fourfold) (i) when cells were incubated with high extracellular drug concentrations (typically 200 mg/liter) as opposed to clinically meaningful concentrations (10 mg/liter or lower), (ii) during ATP- depletion and at acid pH, and (iii) during coincubation with probenecid, gemfibrozil and the preferential multidrug resistance-related protein (MRP) inhibitor MK571. All these conditions were also associated with a marked decrease in ciprofloxacin efflux (half-lives increased from <2 min in controls to up to 10 min). Monensin (a proton ionophore), verapamil, and the preferential P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor GF120918 had no or only minimal effect, while cyclosporin A, which is not specific for P-gp but also acts on MRP, had an intermediate effect. Short-term uptake studies showed that the influence of the modulators on the apparent drug influx was almost immediate (delay of < or =1 min). Cells made resistant to probenecid and showing a marked overexpression of MRP1 (by Western blot analysis and confocal microscopy) accumulated ciprofloxacin to almost the same extent as did control cells, but efflux was inhibited less by probenecid, gemfibrozil, and MK571. We conclude that ciprofloxacin is subject to constitutive efflux in J774 macrophages through the activity of an MRP-related transporter which is probably distinct from MRP1. We also suggest that the cellular accumulation of ciprofloxacin in wild-type cells is constitutively impaired at therapeutically meaningful concentrations.

Intracellular pharmacodynamics of antibiotics

This article establishes the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters that are important when considering the intracellular activity of antibiotics. Generally speaking, the main classes of antibiotics seem to share globally the same properties against extracellular and intracellular organisms. The specific cellular pharmacokinetic properties may modulate those parameters so as to let other ones to become critical. Simple rules, such as equating accumulation and activity, are certainly incorrect, and other determinants need to be added to the equation. Finally, this article emphasizes the fact that much remains to be done in this area before rational therapeutic choices can be made.

Fluoroquinolones in the Treatment of Meningitis

The continuous increase of resistant pathogens causing meningitis has limited the efficacy of standard therapeutic regimens. Due to their excellent activity in vitro and their good penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), fluoroquinolones appear promising for the treatment of meningitis caused by gram-negative microorganisms, ie, Neisseria meningitidis and nosocomial gram-negative bacilli. The newer fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and garenoxacin) have excellent activity against gram-positive microorganisms. Studies in animal models and limited clinical data indicate that they may play a future role in the treatment of pneumococcal meningitis. Analysis of pharmacodynamic parameters suggests that CSF concentrations that produce a C(peak)/minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) ratio of at least 5 and concentrations above the MBC during the entire dosing interval are a prerequisite for maximal bactericidal activity in meningitis. Of interest, newer fluoroquinolones act synergistically with vancomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, meropenem) against penicillin-resistant pneumococci in experimental rabbit meningitis, potentially providing a new therapeutic strategy. Clinical trials are needed to further explore the usefulness of quinolones as single agents or in combination with other drugs in the therapy of pneumococcal meningitis.

Antimicrobial activities against 84 Listeria monocytogenes isolates from patients with systemic listeriosis at a comprehensive cancer center (1955-1997)

Listeriosis is a serious complication in patients undergoing treatment for cancer. We present antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 84 clinical Listeria monocytogenes isolates. During 1955 to 1997, in vitro susceptibility for penicillin (97.6%), ampicillin (90.7%), erythromycin (98.8%), tetracycline (96.9%), and gentamicin (98.0%) remained unchanged. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and vancomycin. High prevalence of clindamycin resistance (96.2%) was unexpected. Ampicillin plus gentamicin is standard therapy for systemic listerosis, and TMP-SMX may be used for patients with beta-lactam intolerance. In vitro susceptibility profiles for carbapenem and fluoronated quinolone are promising, although clinical validation is critically needed before routine use is advocated, especially for listeric patients with severe cellular immune defects.

Comparative intracellular (THP-1 macrophage) and extracellular activities of beta-lactams, azithromycin, gentamicin, and fluoroquinolones against Listeria monocytogenes at clinically relevant concentrations

The activities of ampicillin, meropenem, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin against intracellular hemolysin-positive Listeria monocytogenes were measured in human THP-1 macrophages and were compared with the extracellular activities observed in broth. All extracellular concentrations were adjusted to explore ranges that are clinically achievable in human serum upon conventional therapy. In broth, ampicillin, meropenem, and azithromycin were only bacteriostatic, whereas gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin were strongly bactericidal in a concentration-dependent manner. In cells, ampicillin, meropenem, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin were slightly bactericidal (0.3- to 0.8-log CFU reductions), moxifloxacin was strongly bactericidal (2.1-log CFU reduction), and gentamicin was virtually inactive. The difference in the efficacies of moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in cells did not result from a difference in levels of accumulation in cells (6.96 +/- 1.05 versus 7.75 +/- 1.03) and was only partially explainable by the difference in the MICs (0.58 +/- 0.04 versus 1.40 +/- 0.17 mg/liter). Further analysis showed that intracellular moxifloxacin expressed only approximately 1/7 of the activity demonstrated against extracellular bacteria and ciprofloxacin expressed only 1/15 of the activity demonstrated against extracellular bacteria. Gentamicin did not increase the intracellular activities of the other antibiotics tested. The data suggest (i) that moxifloxacin could be of potential interest for eradication of the intracellular forms of L. monocytogenes, (ii) that the cellular accumulation of an antibiotic is not the only determinant of its intracellular activity (for fluoroquinolones, it is actually a self-defeating process as far as activity is concerned), and (iii) that pharmacodynamics (activity-to-concentration relationships) need to be considered for the establishment of efficacy against intracellular bacteria, just as they are for the establishment of efficacy against extracellular infections.

Antimicrobial activities of clarithromycin, gatifloxacin and sitafloxacin, in combination with various antimycobacterial drugs against extracellular and intramacrophage Mycobacterium avium complex

We studied the activities of clarithromycin and fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, sitafloxacin, levofloxacin) in combination with other antimycobacterial drugs against extracellular and intramacrophage Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Clarithromycin potentiated the activities of rifampicin and rifalazil against both extracellular and intramacrophage MAC. In contrast, all the test quinolones exhibited antagonistic effects against extracellular MAC when combined with either clarithromycin or rifamycins. Such an antagonism was not observed for the activity of these combinations against intramacrophage MAC. Combined effects were observed with combinations of these fluoroquinolones with either ethambutol or streptomycin. Similar profiles were seen for the activities of two-drug combinations of clarithromycin or fluoroquinolones with other drugs against intramacrophage MAC isolated from pulmonary and disseminated MAC infections.

The new antibiotics

It is easy to become overwhelmed by the amount of information available on the new antibiotics and difficult to keep abreast of the appropriate indications for each of them. For most patients with community-acquired infections, the first-line agent is usually not one of the newer agents, but a standard regimen, or at times, no antibiotic at all. The development of resistance is likely to parallel the extent to which these agents are prescribed. They should be used only when standard treatment fails, when compliance with treatment is a real and serious issue, or when the patient has a real allergic reaction to the standard regimen.

Monotherapy versus combination therapy for bacterial infections

The authors discuss the latest findings regarding the use of one or more antimicrobial drugs for a variety of infections. They offer suggestions for treatment based on a host of considerations, including the synergy and antagonism of specific drugs, type of infection, potential toxicities, and cost.

Intracerebral activity of antibiotics against Listeria monocytogenes during experimental rhombencephalitis

We used a model of rhombencephalitis in gerbils to test the efficacy of various antibiotics against Listeria monocytogenes. Gerbils were inoculated in the middle ear with strain EGD and treated subcutaneously with various antibiotics alone or in combination. We found that the most active antibiotics on intracerebral bacteria were amoxycillin, co-trimoxazole, rifampicin and imipenem. Vancomycin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were weakly or not active. The combinations amoxycillin-co-trimoxazole, amoxycillin-gentamicin and co-trimoxazole-rifampicin were highly active against intracerebral bacteria.

The antibacterial efficacy of trovafloxacin against an experimental infection with Listeria monocytogenes in hydrocortisone-treated mice

The efficacy of trovafloxacin in treating Listeria monocytogenes infections in glucocorticosteroid-treated mice was compared with the efficacy of amoxycillin. Swiss mice were treated with daily injections of 2.5 mg hydrocortisone s.c. and then infected i.v. with 1 x 10(7) cfu of L. monocytogenes. Untreated, this level of infection resulted in 100% mortality between day 3 and day 5 after infection. Both s.c. trovafloxacin and amoxycillin were effective in reducing the number of viable L. monocytogenes in the liver and spleen. Although the MIC of amoxycillin for this isolate of L. monocytogenes was lower than that of trovafloxacin (0.063 mg/L versus 0.5 mg/L, respectively), trovafloxacin was more efficacious in vivo after a single dose in the dose range between 12.5 and 100 mg/kg than was amoxycillin. After treatment with trovafloxacin at 100 mg/kg bodyweight od for 3 days, a mean log10 cfu of 1.58 and 2.52 L. monocytogenes could be recovered from the spleens and livers, respectively, whereas after treatment with amoxycillin at 100 mg/kg bodyweight every 8 h for 3 days, the mean 1og10 cfu values were 2.36 and 2.02, respectively. These differences were statistically not significant. Results of the present study show that the antibacterial efficacy of trovafloxacin against L. monocytogenes in our animal model is equivalent to that of amoxycillin.

Comparative efficacies of antibiotics in a rat model of meningoencephalitis due to Listeria monocytogenes

The antibacterial activities of amoxicillin-gentamicin, trovafloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and the combination of trovafloxacin with TMP-SMX were compared in a model of meningoencephalitis due to Listeria monocytogenes in infant rats. At 22 h after intracisternal infection, the cerebrospinal fluid was cultured to document meningitis, and the treatment was started. Treatment was instituted for 48 h, and efficacy was evaluated 24 h after administration of the last dose. All tested treatment regimens exhibited significant activities in brain, liver, and blood compared to infected rats receiving saline (P < 0.001). In the brain, amoxicillin plus gentamicin was more active than all of the other regimens, and trovafloxacin was more active than TMP-SMX (bacterial titers of 4.1 +/- 0.5 log10 CFU/ml for amoxicillin-gentamicin, 5.0 +/- 0.4 log10 CFU/ml for trovafloxacin, and 5.8 +/- 0.5 log10 CFU/ml for TMP-SMX; P < 0.05). In liver, amoxicillin-gentamicin and trovafloxacin were similarly active (2.8 +/- 0.8 and 2.7 +/- 0.8 log10 CFU/ml, respectively) but more active than TMP-SMX (4.4 +/- 0. 6 log10 CFU/ml; P < 0.05). The combination of trovafloxacin with TMP-SMX did not alter the antibacterial effect in the brain, but it did reduce the effect of trovafloxacin in the liver. Amoxicillin-gentamicin was the most active therapy in this study, but the activity of trovafloxacin suggests that further studies with this drug for the treatment of Listeria infections may be warranted.

The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the literature available on the new fluoroquinolones - clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin - to compare these agents with each other and contrast them with ciprofloxacin, an older fluoroquinolone.

DATA SELECTION

Published papers used were obtained by searching MEDLINE for articles published between 1994 and 1998, inclusive. References of published papers were also obtained and reviewed. Abstracts from scientific proceedings were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Due to the limited data available on several of the agents, criteria for study inclusion in the in vitro, pharmacokinetics and in vivo sections were not restrictive.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The new fluoroquinolones offer excellent Gram-negative bacillary activity and improved Gram-positive activity (eg, against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (eg, Bacteriodes fragilis). All of the new fluoroquinolones have a longer serum half-life than ciprofloxacin (allowing for once daily dosing), and several are eliminated predominantly by nonrenal means. No clinical trials are available comparing the new fluoroquinolones with each other. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones with standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of infections. Their adverse effect profile is similar to that of ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin cause a high incidence of phototoxicity (1.5% to 14% and 2% to 11.7%, respectively), grepafloxacin causes a high incidence of taste perversion (9% to 17%) and trovafloxacin causes a high incidence of dizziness (11%). They all interact with metal ion-containing drugs (eg, antacids), and clinafloxacin and grepafloxacin interact with theophylline. The new fluoroquinolones are expensive; however, their use may result in savings in situations where, because of their potent and broad spectrum of activity, they can be used orally in place of intravenous antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The new fluoroquinolones offer advantages over ciprofloxacin in terms of improved in vitro activity and pharmacokinetics. Whether these advantages translate into improved clinical outcomes is presently unknown. The new fluoroquinolones have the potential to emerge as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of respiratory tract and genitourinary tract infections.

Central nervous system infection with Listeria monocytogenes. 33 years' experience at a general hospital and review of 776 episodes from the literature

We reviewed 776 previously reported and 44 new cases of CNS listeriosis outside of pregnancy and the neonatal period, and evaluated the epidemiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic characteristics of this infection. Among patients with Listeria meningitis/meningoencephalitis, hematologic malignancy and kidney transplantation were the leading predisposing factors, but 36% of patients had no underlying diseases recognized. The infection occurred throughout life, with a higher incidence before the age of 3 and after the age of 45-50 years. Fever, altered sensorium, and headache were the most common symptoms, but 42% of patients had no meningeal signs on admission. Compared with patients with acute meningitis due to other bacterial pathogens, patients with Listeria infection had a significantly lower incidence of meningeal signs, and the CSF profile was significantly less likely to have a high WBC count or a high protein concentration. Gram stain of CSF was negative in two-thirds of cases of CNS listeriosis. One-third of patients had focal neurologic findings, and approximately one-fourth developed seizures over their course. Mortality was 26% overall, and was higher among patients with seizures and those older than 65 years of age. Relapse occurred in 7% of episodes. Ampicillin for a minimum of 15-21 days (with an aminoglycoside for at least the first 7-10 days) remains the treatment of choice. Cerebritis/abscess due to L. monocytogenes, without meningeal involvement, is less common but may be diagnosed by blood cultures and CNS imaging, or by stereotactic biopsy. Longer antibiotic therapy (at least 5-6 weeks) is needed in the presence of localized CNS involvement.

Successful treatment of murine listeriosis and salmonellosis with levofloxacin

Levofloxacin (L-ofloxacin) is a fluoroquinolone derivative. It is the active substance contained in ofloxacin with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. In this work we examined the activity of levofloxacin against the facultative intracellular bacteria Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium in vitro, in tissue culture and in animal models of infection. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) MIC90 for Salmonella enterica and L. monocytogenes were 0.078 mg/l and 4 mg/l, respectively. Levofloxacin was bactericidal against L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium because 8 x MIC killed 90% of the initial inoculum of L. monocytogenes EGD and S. typhimurium LT2 within 4 hours and 3 hours, respectively. Levofloxacin was more effective than ampicillin against L. monocytogenes EGD infecting tissue culture cells. Also in tissue culture cells infected with S. typhimurium LT2, levofloxacin was slightly more effective than ciprofloxacin. In animal models of infection, levofloxacin was as potent as the reference substances. In conclusion, levofloxacin is a candidate for the treatment of infections caused by facultative intracellular Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

In vitro extracellular and intracellular activity of two newer and two earlier fluoroquinolones against Listeria monocytogenes

Two new fluoroquinolones (trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin) with enhanced activity against gram-positive pathogens and two earlier compounds (ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin) were tested for their in vitro inhibitory and bactericidal activity against 80 strains of Listeria monocytogenes. All strains were uniformly highly susceptible to trovafloxacin, the MIC90 being 0.25 mg/l. Resistance to sparfloxacin was not detected, however the MIC90 of sparfloxacin was eight times that of trovafloxacin. A few strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin (MIC90 4 mg/l for both drugs). MBCs usually exceeded MICs by 2 to 4 times. The MBC90 of trovafloxacin (1 mg/l) was lower than that of the other three drugs (8 mg/l). After checking their ability to enter and grow within human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells, four strains were used to study the intracellular activity and eradicating power of the four quinolones. Trovafloxacin was more active than sparfloxacin and the earlier fluoroquinolones in terms of both intracellular killing and inhibition of a cytopathogenic effect. The uniform high-level activity of trovafloxacin against Listeria monocytogenes isolates in conventional in vitro assays and its extracellular and intracellular killing of invasive strains suggest that this and maybe other new fluoroquinolones should be further investigated as possible anti-listerial agents.