Activities of beta-lactams against Acinetobacter genospecies as determined by agar dilution and E-test MIC methods

Acinetobacter baumannii Infections in Hospitalized Patients, Treatment Outcomes

Background Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), an opportunistic pathogen, could develop into serious infections with high mortality and financial burden. The debate surrounding the selection of effective antibiotic treatment necessitates studies to define the optimal approach. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of commonly used treatment regimens in hospitalized patients with AB infections to guide stewardship efforts. Material and methods: Ethical approval was obtained, 320 adult patients with confirmed AB infections admitted to our tertiary care facility within two years were enrolled. The treatment outcomes were statistically analyzed to study the relation between antibiotic regimens and 14, 28, and 90-day mortality as the primary outcomes using binary logistic regression—using R software—in addition to the length of hospitalization, adverse events due to antibiotic treatment, and 90-day recurrence as secondary outcomes. Results: Among 320 patients, 142 (44%) had respiratory tract, 105 (33%) soft tissue, 42 (13%) urinary tract, 22 (7%) bacte iemia, and other infections 9 (3%). Nosocomial infections were 190 (59%) versus community-acquired. Monotherapy was significantly associated with lower 28-day (p < 0.05, OR:0.6] and 90-day (p < 0.05, OR:0.4) mortality rates, shorter length of stay LOS (p < 0.05, Median: −12 days] and limited development of adverse events (p < 0.05, OR:0.4). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results ranging from lower odds of mortality, adverse events, and shorter LOS to statistically significant correlation to monotherapy. Meropenem (MEM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) monotherapies showed non-significant high odd ratios of mortalities, adverse events, and disparate LOS. There was a statistical correlation between most combined therapies and adverse events, and longer LOS. Colistin based and colistin/meropenem (CST/MEM) combinations were superior in terms of 14-day mortality (p = 0.05, OR:0.4) and (p < 0.05, OR:0.4) respectively. Pip/Taz and MEM-based combined therapies were associated with statistically non-significant high odd ratios of mortalities. Tigecycline (TGC)-based combinations showed a significant correlation to mortalities (p < 0.05, OR:2.5). Conclusion: Monotherapy was associated with lower mortality rates, shorter LOS, and limited development of adverse events compared to combined therapies. Colistin monotherapy, colistin/meropenem, and other colistin combinations showed almost equivalent mortality outcomes. Patients on combined therapy were more susceptible to adverse events and comparable LOS. The possible adverse outcomes of PIP/TAZ and MEM-based therapies in the treatment of MDRAB infections and the association of TGC with a higher mortality rate raise doubts about their treatment role.

Comparative genomics analysis of Acinetobacter haemolyticus isolates from sputum samples of respiratory patients

Acinetobacter haemolyticus (A. haemolyticus) is a significant Acinetobacter pathogen, and the resistance of A. haemolyticus continues to rise due to abuse of antibiotics and the frequent gene exchange between bacteria in hospital. In this study, we performed complete genome sequencing of two A. haemolyticus strains TJR01 and TJS01 to improve our understanding of pathogenic and resistance of A. haemolyticus. Both TJR01 and TJS01 contain one chromosome and two plasmids. Compared to TJS01, more virulence factors (VFs) associated pathogenicity and resistant genes were predicted in TJR01 due to T4SS and integron associated with combination and transport. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were consistent with sequencing. We suppose TJS01 was a susceptive strain and TJR01 was an acquired multidrug resistance strain due to plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer. We hope these findings may be helpful for clinical treatment of A. haemolyticus infection and reduce the risk of potential outbreak infection.

Activities of various β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter DNA group 3 strains

Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter DNA group 3 are members of the so-called A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex and are important nosocomial pathogens. Multiresistance in these organisms is increasingly frequent, and alternative treatment options are needed. The beta-lactamase inhibitors clavulanate, sulbactam and tazobactam have intrinsic activity against Acinetobacter strains. In the present study, broth microdilution was used to assess the in-vitro activities of currently available beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and sulbactam alone against 469 Acinetobacter isolates (A. baumannii, n=395; Acinetobacter DNA group 3, n=74) collected from various laboratories in Germany. Fixed concentrations and fixed ratios of beta-lactamase inhibitors were used. Sulbactam-containing combinations (susceptibility rates of 90.4-92.7% for A. baumannii and 97.3-100% for Acinetobacter DNA group 3) and sulbactam alone were superior to clavulanate- and tazobactam-containing combinations. The activity of sulbactam-containing combinations against members of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex was conferred exclusively by the intrinsic activity of the beta-lactamase inhibitor and did not result from enhanced beta-lactam activity. Testing with the inhibitor added at a fixed ratio of inhibitor to beta-lactam appeared to give more reliable results than testing at a fixed concentration of the inhibitor. Resistance to carbapenems (0.3%) remains low in Germany.

In vitro activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam alone or in combination with beta-lactams against epidemiologically characterized multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important nosocomial pathogen usually in the context of serious underlying disease. Multidrug resistance in these organisms is frequent. The beta-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam have intrinsic activity against Acinetobacter strains. To evaluate their potential therapeutic usefulness, we determined the in vitro activity of ampicillin, sulbactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin, piperacillin-sulbactam, tazobactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, amoxicillin, clavulanic acid, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ticarcillin, and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. All isolates were epidemiologically characterized by RAPD [random(ly) amplified polymorphic DNA] analysis and/or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and represented different strain types, including sporadic strains, as well as outbreak-related strains. The MICs were determined by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar (using fixed concentrations, as well as fixed ratios for beta-lactamase inhibitors) and the E-test. The majority of E-test results were within two dilutions of those recorded by agar dilution, with the exception of piperacillin-tazobactam. Sulbactam was superior to clavulanic acid and tazobactam and may represent an alternative treatment option for infections due to multiresistant A. baumannii strains. beta-Lactamase inhibitors have intrinsic activity but do not enhance activity of beta-lactams against A. baumannii. Testing with the inhibitor added at a fixed concentration as recommended for piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards may falsely suggest high activity or gives uninterpretable results due to trailing. If combinations are used for testing, fixed ratios may give more useful results.

Molecular characterization of the gene encoding a new AmpC beta-lactamase in a clinical strain of acinetobacter genomic species 3

A presumptive chromosomal cephalosporinase (pI, 9.0) from a clinical strain of Acinetobacter genomic species 3 (AG3) is reported. The nucleotide sequence of this beta-lactamase shows for the first time the gene encoding an AmpC enzyme in AG3. In addition, the biochemical properties of the novel AG3 AmpC beta-lactamase are reported

Antimicrobial susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance to quinolones and beta-lactams in Acinetobacter genospecies 3

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined in 15 epidemiologically unrelated clinical isolates of Acinetobacter genospecies 3. Moreover, the mechanisms of resistance to some beta-lactam antibiotics may be associated with the presence of a chromosomal cephalosporinase, AmpC, and the resistance to quinolones related to mutations in the gyrA and parC genes.

Susceptibility of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus–A. baumannii complex to imipenem, meropenem, sulbactam and colistin

The Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex includes some of the most clinically relevant species of the genus Acinetobacter due to their capacity to cause epidemic nosocomial outbreaks as well as their increasing resistance to antibiotics. Susceptibility of Acinetobacter strains varies greatly depending on origin, thus highlighting the importance of local analyses of susceptibility profiles. Two hundred twenty-one strains of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex were identified using biochemical tests and were biotyped. Strain susceptibility to imipenem, meropenem, colistin and sulbactam was studied using agar dilution. Eight different biotypes were found, type 1 accounting for 69.2% of the strains. MIC(50) and MIC(90) to imipenem, meropenem, colistin and sulbactam were 4 and 8 mg/l, 16 and 32 mg/l, 0.5 and 1mg/l, and 8 and 16 mg/l, with susceptibility rates of 64.3, 22.6, 98.2 and 73.8%, respectively. Biotype 1 was the most resistant. A statistically significant difference was observed for the mean MIC of the four predominant biotypes to imipenem, meropenem and sulbactam but not to colistin.

Multiresistant Acinetobacter infections: a role for sulbactam combinations in overcoming an emerging worldwide problem

Recent studies have highlighted the emergence of infections involving multiresistant Acinetobacter clinical isolates. Sulbactam offers direct antimicrobial activity against Acinetobacter species. Accordingly, co-administration of sulbactam with ampicillin or cefoperazone offers the potential of effective empirical therapy against Acinetobacter and other bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae in institutions in which they are susceptible. Many in vitro studies have indicated that Acinetobacter remains fully susceptible to ampicillin-sulbactam or cefoperazone-sulbactam. Furthermore, ampicillin-sulbactam has proven clinically effective and well tolerated in the treatment of severe acinetobacter infections, including bacteremia. Therefore, ampicillin-sulbactam is a sensible option for the treatment of life-threatening acinetobacter infections.

Resistance to antibiotics and biocides among non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the antibiotic and biocide susceptibilities of clinical isolates of rarely encountered Gram-negative, non-fermenting bacteria.

METHODS

Thirty Gram-negative non-fermenting bacterial strains were isolated from blood cultures of oncology patients. These were studied for their resistance to 11 antibiotics. Their susceptibilities to seven biocides used in hospitals were also examined.

RESULTS

Isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Ochrobactrum anthropi were generally resistant to at least five of the antibiotics, whereas isolates of Comamonas acidivorans, Flavobacterium oryzihabitans, Aeromonas hydrophila, Sphingobacterium spiritivorum, Acinetobacter junii and Acinetobacter lwoffi were generally sensitive to at least nine of the antibiotics. Trovafloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were the most effective antibacterial agents tested, with 0% and 7%, respectively, of isolates being resistant, whereas 63% of isolates were resistant to aztreonam. Some isolates, sensitive to meropenem and/or ceftazidime in vitro, possessed very high MBC/MIC ratios for these beta-lactams. Two out of three biocides used in hospital pharmacies showed lethal activity towards all strains tested when used at less than one-third of their recommended in-use concentration. Proceine 40 failed to give a 5 log reduction in bacterial cell number for the isolates tested when used at its "in-use" concentration. A concentration of > 500 mg/L chlorhexidine was required to achieve a 5 log reduction for the same isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

We have examined the antibiotic susceptibilities of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacterial strains isolated from immunocompromised patients. Despite being sensitive to certain antibiotics in vitro, some isolates were still able to cause serious bacteremia. We have also reported for the first time the susceptibilities of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria to common biocides used in hospital infection control, and have shown that some strains are able to persist at the "in-use" concentration of particular biocides. It is therefore important to study further this particular group of organisms, and, in particular, to examine whether there exists a link between resistance to antibiotics and resistance to biocides.

Emerging importance of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as pathogens in seriously ill patients: geographic patterns, epidemiological features, and trends in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-1999)

As part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, a total of 1078 Acinetobacter species and 842 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates were collected between January 1997 and December 1999 from 5 geographic regions (Canada, the United States, Latin America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific). The frequency of infections (by geographic region and body site), including those due to imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter species and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ)-resistant S. maltophilia, was evaluated. The possibility of seasonal variations in bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter species was studied, as was the activity of several therapeutic antimicrobials against all strains. Acinetobacter species and S. maltophilia were most frequently associated with pulmonary infections, independent of the region evaluated. In contrast, patterns of antimicrobial resistance markedly varied among distinct geographic regions, especially for nosocomial isolates. Although the carbapenems were the most active antimicrobials against Acinetobacter species, nearly 11.0% of the nosocomial isolates were resistant to this drug group in both regions. TMP-SMZ, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, gatifloxacin, and trovafloxacin were the only agents with consistent therapeutic activity against S. maltophilia isolates. Rates of resistance to TMP-SMZ ranged from 2% in Canada and Latin America to 10% in Europe. The geographic differences in resistance patterns among Acinetobacter species and S. maltophilia isolates observed in this study emphasize the importance of local surveillance in determining the most adequate therapy for acinetobacter and S. maltophilia infections and the possible clonal, epidemic nature of occurrence.

Detection of carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in a hospital

Acinetobacter baumannii strains resistant to both imipenem (IPM) and ceftazidime (CAZ) were isolated from 1994 through 1996 at Gunma University Hospital. Nine isolates from different inpatients were examined for carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity and for the carbapemase gene bla(IMP) by the PCR method. All nine isolates were carbapenemase-producing strains that hydrolyzed IPM and that harbored bla(IMP). The bla(IMP) gene was transmissible by conjugation to an IPM-susceptible recipient strain of A. baumannii and conferred resistance to IPM, CAZ, cefotaxime (CTX), ampicillin (AMP), and piperacillin (PIP). Either intermediate or high-level resistance to amikacin (AMK) was transferred from two and five strains, respectively, concomitantly with bla(IMP), and gentamicin (GEN) resistance was also transferred in one instance of high-level AMK resistance. Comparative examination of clinical isolates for resistance patterns to nine drugs, IPM, CAZ, CTX, aztreonam, AMP, PIP, AMK, GEN, and norfloxacin, in addition to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns with NotI-digested genomic DNA, confirmed nosocomial transmission of infections involving carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii strains.

Piperacillin/tazobactam: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections

Piperacillin/tazobactam is a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity encompassing most Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic bacteria and anaerobic bacteria, including many pathogens producing beta-lactamases. Evidence from clinical trials in adults has shown that piperacillin/tazobactam, administered in an 8:1 ratio, is an effective treatment for patients with lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal, urinary tract, gynaecological and skin/soft tissue infections, and for fever in patients with neutropenia. Combination regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam plus an aminoglycoside are used to treat patients with severe nosocomial (hospital-acquired) infections. In clinical trials, piperacillin/tazobactam was significantly more effective than ticarcillin/clavulanic acid in terms of clinical and microbiological outcome in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. In patients with intra-abdominal infections, clinical and bacteriological response rates were significantly higher with piperacillin/tazobactam than with imipenem/cilastatin (administered at a dosage lower than is recommended in countries outside Scandinavia). Piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with amikacin was at least as effective as ceftazidime plus amikacin in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia and was significantly more effective than ceftazidime plus amikacin in the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in patients with neutropenia or granulocytopenia. In other trials, the efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam was similar to that of standard aminoglycoside-containing and other treatment regimens in patients with intra-abdominal, skin/soft tissue or gynaecological infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam is generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events are gastrointestinal symptoms (most commonly diarrhoea) and skin reactions. The incidence of adverse events with piperacillin/tazobactam is higher when the combination is given in combination with an aminoglycoside than when given as monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Because of the broad spectrum of antibacterial activity provided by piperacillin/tazobactam, it is useful for the treatment of patients with polymicrobial infections caused by aerobic or anaerobic beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Piperacillin/tazobactam appears to have a particularly useful role in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections and, in combination with amikacin, in the treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia, especially given the current prevalence of Gram-positive infections in this group.

Antimicrobial activity of 12 broad-spectrum agents tested against 270 nosocomial blood stream infection isolates caused by non-enteric gram-negative bacilli: occurrence of resistance, molecular epidemiology, and screening for metallo-enzymes

A total of 270 recent nosocomial blood stream isolates of non-Enterobacteriaceae Gram-negative bacilli representing nearly 50 U.S. medical centers were characterized. The numbers of isolates of individual organisms were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 204), Acinetobacter spp. (n = 48), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 18). MICs were determined using the broth microdilution susceptibility method with 12 antimicrobial agents: piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Based on current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards breakpoints, rates of resistance to cefepime, ceftazidime, and imipenem were as follows: P. aeruginosa, 3, 9, and 5%; Acinetobacter spp., 2, 37, and 0%; and S. maltophilia, 88.7, 35.3, and 100%, respectively. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was the most active agent against S. maltophilia (100% susceptible). Twenty-eight isolates of P. aeruginosa that expressed high levels of resistance to ceftazidime (MIC, > 256 micrograms/mL) and imipenem (MIC, > 32 micrograms/mL) were examined for potential metallo-beta-lactamase production by polymerase chain reaction and were found to be negative. Molecular typing of P. aeruginosa isolates revealed many patient-unique strains, but also noted clustering of infections due to isolates of the same DNA type, suggesting possible nosocomial transmission in 9 of 14 medical centers. Given the resistance profile and pathogenic potential of these non-enteric Gram-negative bacilli, considerable effort should be exerted to develop and enforce infection control and antimicrobial utilization practices that will limit the spread of these organisms in the hospital environment.