Pharmacokinetics and safety of high-dose and extended-interval regimens of levofloxacin in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Photoelectrocatalytic treatment of levofloxacin using Ti/MMO/ZnO electrode

Here, the antibiotic levofloxacin (LFX) widely used and detected in the environment was degraded by photoelectrolysis using a new electrode based on zinc oxide (ZnO) and a mixture of mixed oxides of ruthenium and titanium (MMO). The influence of the potential and irradiation of UV light was investigated in the photostability of the Ti/MMO/ZnO electrode and in the degradation of the antibiotic. The experiments were conducted at different pH values (5.0, 7.0 and 9.0) in sodium sulfate solution in a glass reactor with central lighting. It was observed that the new Ti/MMO/ZnO electrode has good stability under light irradiation and potential, presenting excellent photocurrent and high photoactivity in LFX photoelectrolysis. The removal efficiency of the compound was directly related to the formation of oxidizing species in solution, the photo-generated charges on the electrode and the electrostatic characteristics of the molecule. The mineralization rate, the formation of reaction intermediates and short chain carboxylic acids (acetic, maleic, oxalic and oxamic acid), in addition to the formation of N-mineral species (NO₃^- and NH₄⁺) was dependent on the pH of the solution and the investigated processes: photoelectrolysis was more efficient than photolysis, which, in turn, was more efficient than electrolysis. The synergistic effect and the high rate of degradation of LFX after 4.0 h of treatment (100%) observed in photoelectrolysis at alkaline pH, was associated with the high stability of the Ti/MMO/ZnO electrode at this pH, the photoactivation of sulfate ions and the ease generation of oxidizing radicals, such as OH.

Levofloxacin or gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist treatment decreases intrauterine microbial colonization in human endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

We examined the hypothesis that antibiotic treatment with or without gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) may decrease intrauterine infection with consequent decrease in tissue inflammation, cell proliferation and angiogenesis in human endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective non-randomized observational study. Endometrial/endometriotic samples were collected during surgery from 53 women with endometriosis and 47 control women who were treated with levofloxacin (LVFX, 500 mg, once per os) or GnRHa (1.88 mg/IM for 3 months) before surgery. Endometrial samples were analyzed by broad-range polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) amplification of bacteria targeting V5-V6 region of 16S rRNA gene. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies against CD138 (Syndecan-1, a marker of plasma cells), CD68 (marker of macrophages), Ki-67 (cell proliferation marker), and CD31 (vascular cells marker).

RESULTS

16S rDNA metagenome assay indicated that treatment with either of LVFX or GnRHa + LVFX significantly decreased some components of major bacterial genera comparing to untreated group. In women with endometriosis, treatment with either of LVFX or GnRHa + LVFX significantly decreased Gardnerella, Prevotella, Acidibactor, Atopobium, Megasphaera, and Bradyrhizobium (p < 0.05 for each) comparing to untreated group. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test indicated that occurrence rate of chronic endometritis was significantly decreased after GnRHa + LVFX treatment comparing to GnRHa treatment group (p = 0.041). These findings were coincided with significantly decreased CD68-stained macrophage infiltration, Ki-67- stained cell proliferation and CD31-stained micro-vessel density in endometria and endometriotic lesions with histology proven improvement in the morphological appearance of ovarian endometrioma.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that clinical administration of a broad-spectrum antibiotic with or without GnRHa may be effective in improving uterine infection with decrease of tissue inflammation, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis in human endometriosis.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral and tuberculosis drugs in children with HIV/TB co-infection: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Management of concomitant use of ART and TB drugs is difficult because of the many drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the medications. This systematic review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ART and TB treatment in children with HIV/TB co-infection, and identifies knowledge gaps.

METHODS

We searched Embase and PubMed, and systematically searched abstract books of relevant conferences, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies not reporting PK parameters, investigating medicines that are not available any longer or not including children with HIV/TB co-infection were excluded. All studies were assessed for quality.

RESULTS

In total, 47 studies met the inclusion criteria. No dose adjustments are necessary for efavirenz during concomitant first-line TB treatment use, but intersubject PK variability was high, especially in children <3 years of age. Super-boosted lopinavir/ritonavir (ratio 1:1) resulted in adequate lopinavir trough concentrations during rifampicin co-administration. Double-dosed raltegravir can be given with rifampicin in children >4 weeks old as well as twice-daily dolutegravir (instead of once daily) in children older than 6 years. Exposure to some TB drugs (ethambutol and rifampicin) was reduced in the setting of HIV infection, regardless of ART use. Only limited PK data of second-line TB drugs with ART in children who are HIV infected have been published.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas integrase inhibitors seem favourable in older children, there are limited options for ART in young children (<3 years) receiving rifampicin-based TB therapy. The PK of TB drugs in HIV-infected children warrants further research.

Adverse Effects of Fluoroquinolones: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a South Indian Tertiary Healthcare Facility

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety review revealed that the use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) is linked with disabling and potentially permanent serious adverse effects. These adverse effects compromise the tendons, muscles, joints, nerves, and central nervous system of the human body. The purpose of the study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by FQs in comparison with other antibiotics used. A retrospective cohort study was conducted over seven months in Kasturba Medical College Hospital, Manipal, India. Patients who were prescribed with FQs were selected as the study cohort (SC; n = 482), and those without FQs were the reference cohort (RC; n = 318). The results showed that 8.5% (41) of patients developed ADRs in the SC, whereas 4.1% (13) of patients developed ADRs in the RC. With oral and parenteral routes of administration, almost a similar number of ADRs were observed. Levofloxacin caused the highest number of ADRs reported, especially with the 750-mg dose. Based on a multiple logistic regression model, FQ use (odds ratio (OR): 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-4.39; p = 0.015) and concomitant steroid use (OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 1.31-7.79; p = 0.011) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of ADRs among antibiotics users, whereas age was found to be protective (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-1.00; p = 0.047). The study found a higher incidence of ADRs related to FQs compared to other antibiotics. The study concludes a harmful association between FQ use and the development of ADRs. Moreover, FQs are not safe compared to other antibiotics. Hence, the use of FQs should be limited to the conditions where no other alternatives are available.

Pharmacokinetics of Levofloxacin in Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients

Pharmacodynamics are especially important in the treatment of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB). The free area under the concentration time curve in relation to MIC (fAUC/MIC) is the most relevant pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) parameter for predicting the efficacy of levofloxacin (LFX). The objective of our study was to assess LFX PK variability in M/XDR-TB patients and its potential consequence for fAUC/MIC ratios. Patients with pulmonary M/XDR-TB received LFX as part of the treatment regimen at a dose of 15 mg/kg administered once daily. Blood samples obtained at steady state before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 12 h after drug administration were measured by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The MIC values of LFX were determined by the agar dilution method on Middlebrook 7H10 and the MGIT960 system. Twenty patients with a mean age of 31 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 27 to 35 years) were enrolled in this study. The median AUC_0-24 was 98.8 mg/h/liter (IQR = 84.8 to 159.6 mg/h/liter). The MIC median value for LFX was 0.5 mg/liter with a range of 0.25 to 2.0 mg/liter, and the median fAUC_0-24/MIC ratio was 109.5 (IQR = 48.5 to 399.4). In 4 of the 20 patients, the value was below the target value of ≥100. When MICs of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/liter were applicable, 19, 18, 3, and no patients, respectively, had an fAUC/MIC ratio that exceeded 100. We observed a large variability in AUC. An fAUC_0-24/MIC of ≥100 was only observed when the MIC values for LFX were 0.25 to 0.5 mg/liter. Dosages exceeding 15 mg/kg should be considered for target attainment if exposures are assumed to be safe. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02169141.).

Levofloxacin: update and perspectives on one of the original ‘respiratory quinolones’

The fluoroquinolone class of antimicrobials has enjoyed enormous clinical and marketing success over the past 20 years. These drugs have proven to be extremely useful in a broad range of clinical indications including both common community-acquired as well as nosocomial bacterial infections. Levofloxacin (Levaquin, Tavanic), like ciprofloxacin (Cipro), has established an enviable record of safe and efficacious use, and in many ways has become the agent against which all of the newer fluoroquinolones are judged. New clinical indications in complicated skin and skin structure infections, nosocomial pneumonia and chronic bacterial prostatitis continue to expand the important role of this already versatile drug. In addition, the use of 'short-course, high-dose' therapies are being studied in indications, such as community-acquired pneumonia, in an effort to optimize the efficacy and convenience of the drug while minimizing the future development of resistance. As the use of levofloxacin continues to expand, future challenges will include the threat of increasing antimicrobial resistance and the availability of newer alternative agents, both newer fluoroquinolones as well as agents of other antibiotic classes.

Augmenting Effect of Antibiotics on Endotoxin Activity May Cause a Safety Problem

Enhancing/interfering effect of antibiotics on endotoxin was evaluated using the endotoxin test and the cell line assay in 28SC cells that has a responsiveness consistent with that of human peripheral blood. When a total of 21 products of seven different kinds of antibiotics were tested, none showed any significant effect on the endotoxin test at its therapeutic dose. However, aminoglycosides showed a significant augmenting effect on IL-6 induction of endotoxin in 28SC cells. Detailed examination of the augmenting effect was made on spectinomycin in the in vitro cell line assay and also in the lethal endotoxin challenge assay in D -galactosamine-treated mice. Spectinomycin also enhanced the endotoxin lethality in D -galactosamine-treated mice. A kinetic analysis in endotoxin-sensitized 28SC cells revealed that the augmentation takes place as quickly as 10 min after spectinomycin treatment. Accordingly, a special caution concerning the augmenting effect was assumed necessary for the safety control of antibiotic products as well as for selecting antibiotics for the therapeutic use.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous levofloxacin administered at 750 milligrams in obese adults

The physiochemical properties of levofloxacin suggest that it is an agent which may exhibit altered pharmacokinetics in obese individuals. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of a single 750-mg intravenous dose of levofloxacin in both hospitalized and ambulatory obese individuals. The hypothesis was that a standard dose of levofloxacin in obese individuals would achieve serum concentrations likely to be therapeutic. A single levofloxacin dose of 750 mg was infused over 90 min, and seven serial serum samples were subsequently obtained to evaluate the pharmacokinetics after the first dose. The peak concentrations of levofloxacin were comparable to those seen with normal-weight individuals. However, the area under the concentration-time curve and clearance were quite variable. Accelerated clearance was evident in the ambulatory obese individuals. Further investigation of the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin is necessary to ensure optimal dosing.

Intrapulmonary pharmacodynamics of high-dose levofloxacin in subjects with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The objective of this study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered levofloxacin in subjects with stable chronic lung disease. Three doses of 1000 mg levofloxacin were administered once daily to 16 adult subjects divided into four groups of 4 subjects each. Standardised bronchoscopy and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h following administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to drug administration, at the end of the last infusion (maximum concentration (Cmax)) and at the time of BAL. Levofloxacin was measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC/MS/MS) technique. Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar cell (AC) pharmacokinetics were derived using non-compartmental methods. Cmax/MIC(90) and area under the concentration-time curve for 0-24 h after the last dose (AUC(0-24 h)/MIC(90) ratios were calculated for respiratory pathogens with minimum inhibitory concentrations for 90% of the organisms (MIC(90)) of 0.03-2 microg/mL. The Cmax (mean+/-standard deviation), AUC(0-24h) and half-life were, respectively, 9.2+/-2.7 microg/mL, 130 microg h/mL and 8.7 h for plasma, 22.8+/-12.9 microg/mL, 260 microg h/mL and 7.0 h for ELF and 76.3+/-28.7 microg/mL, 1492 microg h/mL and 49.5 h for ACs. Levofloxacin concentrations were quantitatively greater in ACs than in ELF or plasma at all time points, however only the differences between AC concentration and ELF or plasma concentrations in the 4-h and 8-h time groups were statistically significant. Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios in ELF were, respectively, 11.4 and 130 for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 22.8 and 260 for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 91.2 and 1040 for Chlamydia pneumoniae and 760 and 8667 for Haemophilus influenzae. In ACs the ratios were 38.2 and 746 for M. pneumoniae, 76.3 and 1492 for S. pneumoniae, 305 and 5968 for C. pneumoniae and 2543 and 49 733 for H. influenzae. In conclusion, Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration of a 1000 mg dose of levofloxacin and are favourable for the treatment of respiratory infection in patients with chronic lung disease.

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose levofloxacin in healthy volunteer subjects

The objective of this study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered levofloxacin in healthy volunteers. Three doses of either 750 mg or 1000 mg levofloxacin were administered intravenously to 4 healthy adult subjects (750 mg) to 20 healthy adult subjects divided into five groups of 4 subjects (1000 mg). Standardised bronchoscopy and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed following administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to drug administration and at the time of BAL. Levofloxacin was measured in plasma, BAL fluid and alveolar cells (ACs) using a sensitive and specific combined high-performance liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric technique (HPLC/MS/MS). Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and AC pharmacokinetics were derived using non-compartmental methods. The maximum plasma drug concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (C(max)/MIC(90)) and the area under the drug concentration curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC(90)) during the dosing interval were calculated for potential respiratory pathogens with MIC(90) values from 0.03 microg/mL to 2 microg/mL. In the 1000 mg dose group, the C(max) (mean+/-standard deviation (S.D.)), AUC(0-8h) and half-life were: for plasma, 9.2+/-1.9 microg/mL, 103.6 microg h/mL and 7.45 h; for ELF, 25.8+/-7.9 microg/mL, 279.1 microg h/mL and 8.10h; and for ACs, 51.8+/-26.2 microg/mL, 507.5 microg h/mL and 14.32 h. In the 750 mg dose group, the C(max) values in plasma, ELF and ACs were 5.7+/-0.4, 28.0+/-23.6 and 34.2+/-18.7 microg/mL, respectively. Levofloxacin concentrations were significantly higher in ELF and ACs than in plasma at all time points. For pathogens commonly associated with community-acquired pneumonia, C(max)/MIC(90) ratios in ELF ranged from 12.9 for Mycoplasma pneumoniae to 859 for Haemophilus influenzae, and AUC/MIC(90) ratios ranged from 139 to 9303, respectively. The C(max)/MIC(90) ratios in ACs ranged from 25.9 for M. pneumoniae to 1727 for H. influenzae, and AUC/MIC(90) ratios ranged from 254 to 16917, respectively. The C(max)/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration of a 1000 mg dose of levofloxacin and are favourable for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory pathogens.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in intensive care patients

OBJECTIVE

A prospective pharmacokinetic study was performed in Caucasian patients from an intensive care unit with respiratory support to evaluate the influence of this circumstance on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of levofloxacin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A standard dosage regimen of 500 mg/day was administered to nine Caucasian patients included in the study, irrespective of their demographic characteristics. The experimental data on plasma concentrations were analysed by independent-modelling techniques to estimate the following pharmacokinetic parameters: area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)), plasma clearance (CL), maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C(max)(,)(ss)) and elimination half-life (t((1/2))(beta)). Multiple regression analysis was applied to establish the type of correlation between the pharmacokinetic parameters and patient characteristics; the Monte Carlo simulation technique was implemented for the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis based on the probability distribution of the values of AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and C(max)(,)(ss)/MIC observed in this group of patients.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The results show that for AUC the simplest linear model with creatinine clearance as the only independent variable fits the data at a 99% confidence level, explaining more than 85% of the observed variability in this parameter. The volume of distribution, however, showed a statistical correlation with the severity of the illness (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II), although total bodyweight also explains a high percentage of variability of these parameters. Since the group of patients included in the study was small and also included obese individuals, it is difficult to estimate with precision the contribution of each circumstance (overweight or illness severity) to the pharmacokinetic behaviour of levofloxacin.

Levofloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the United States

Levofloxacin (Levaquin) is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and atypical respiratory pathogens. It is active against both penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The prevalence of S. pneumoniae resistance to levofloxacin is <1% overall in the US.A number of randomised comparative trials in the US have demonstrated the efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of infections of the respiratory tract, genitourinary tract, skin and skin structures. Sequential intravenous to oral levofloxacin 750mg once daily for 7-14 days was as effective in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia as intravenous imipenem/cilastatin 500-1000mg every 6-8 hours followed by oral ciprofloxacin 750mg twice daily in one study. In patients with mild to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7-14 days achieved clinical and bacteriological response rates similar to those with comparator agents, including amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil and gatifloxacin. A recent study indicates that intravenous or oral levofloxacin 750mg once daily for 5 days is as effective as 500mg once daily for 10 days, in the treatment of mild to severe CAP. Exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute maxillary sinusitis respond well to treatment with oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7 and 10-14 days, respectively. Oral levofloxacin was as effective as ofloxacin in uncomplicated urinary tract infections and ciprofloxacin or lomefloxacin in complicated urinary tract infections. In men with chronic bacterial prostatitis treated for 28 days, oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily achieved similar clinical and bacteriological response rates to oral ciprofloxacin 500mg twice daily. Uncomplicated skin infections responded well to oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7-10 days, while in complicated skin infections intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin 750mg for 7-14 days was at least as effective as intravenous ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (+/- switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) administered for the same duration. Levofloxacin is generally well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events being nausea and diarrhoea; in comparison with some other quinolones it has a low photosensitising potential and clinically significant cardiac and hepatic adverse events are rare.

CONCLUSION

Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent with activity against a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and atypical organisms. It provides clinical and bacteriological efficacy in a range of infections, including those caused by both penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Levofloxacin is well tolerated, and is associated with few of the phototoxic, cardiac or hepatic adverse events seen with some other quinolones. It also has a pharmacokinetic profile that is compatible with once-daily administration and allows for sequential intravenous to oral therapy. The recent approvals in the US for use in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and chronic bacterial prostatitis, and the introduction of a short-course, high-dose regimen for use in CAP, further extend the role of levofloxacin in treating bacterial infections.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral levofloxacin in critically ill adults in a medical intensive care unit

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To characterize the pharmacokinetic disposition of intravenous and oral levofloxacin in critically ill adults.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty critically ill patients in a medical intensive care unit (ICU).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received levofloxacin as part of their routine medical care. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed in 28 patients receiving intravenous levofloxacin. Ten of these patients subsequently were switched to oral levofloxacin and underwent a second pharmacokinetic evaluation during oral therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean +/- SD levofloxacin half-life, clearance at steady state, and volume of distribution in all 28 patients were 8.0 +/- 1.7 hours, 134 +/- 35 ml/minute, and 1.2 +/- 0.3 L/kg, respectively Maximum and minimum serum concentrations (Cmax and Cmin) and area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours (AUC(0-24)) in patients receiving levofloxacin 500 mg intravenously were 7.5 +/- 0.8 mg/L, 1.0 +/- 0.5 mg/L, and 66.1 +/- 15.7 mg x hour/L, respectively Observed Cmax, Cmin, and time at which maximum concentration was achieved after oral doses of levofloxacin 500 mg were 5.5 +/- 1.1 mg/L, 0.8 +/- 0.4 mg/L, and 1.3 +/- 0.4 hours, respectively. These values were significantly different (p < 0.05) from those observed after intravenous dosing in the same patients; other pharmacokinetic parameters were similar. Statistically significant increases (p < 0.05) in Cmax, Cmin, half-life, and AUC(0-24) were found in critically ill patients administered multiple doses of intravenous levofloxacin compared with historical data from healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosage regimen of intravenous levofloxacin 500 mg once/day appears adequate for most pathogens found in critically ill patients with normal renal function. Less susceptible pathogens may require an increased daily dose for more optimal therapy. Orally administered levofloxacin appears to be well absorbed in selected ICU patients and has pharmacokinetics similar to those of intravenously administered levofloxacin.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin include excellent oral bioavailability (90-99%), extensive penetration into tissues and body fluids, and an elimination half-life (6-12 hrs) that allows for once-daily dosing in patients with normal renal function. Levofloxacin and gatifloxacin primarily are excreted unchanged in the urine, whereas moxifloxacin undergoes hepatic metabolism. The pharmacodynamic values that correlate with successful clinical and microbiologic outcomes, as well as prevent emergence of bacterial resistance, are ratios of maximum or peak unbound drug concentration (Cmax) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and 24-hour unbound area under the concentration curve (AUC(0-24hr)) to MIC. For gram-negative infections, a Cmax:MIC greater than or equal to 10 and AUC(0-24hr):MIC greater than or equal to 125 are associated with increased probability of a successful outcome. For infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, an AUC(0-24hr):MIC of 30 or more is suggested for favorable clinical outcomes. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic values influence rational therapeutic decisions in the selection and dosages of these drugs.

Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in healthy adult subjects

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the steady-state plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.

DESIGN

Multiple-dose, open-label, randomized pharmacokinetic study.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-six healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects were randomized either to oral levofloxacin, 500 or 750 mg once daily for five doses, or ciprofloxacin, 500 mg q12h for nine doses.

INTERVENTIONS

Venipuncture, bronchoscopy, and BAL were performed in each subject at 4 h, 12 h, or 24 h after the last administered dose of antibiotic.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Mean plasma concentrations of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were similar to those previously reported. For once-daily dosing of levofloxacin, 500 mg, the mean (+/- SD) steady-state concentrations at 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h in ELF were 9.9 +/- 2.7 microg/mL, 6.5 +/- 2.5 microg/mL, and 0.7 +/- 0.4 microg/mL, respectively; AM concentrations were 97.9 +/- 80.0 microg/mL, 36.7 +/- 23.4 microg/mL, and 13.8 +/- 16.0 microg/mL, respectively. For levofloxacin, 750 mg, the mean steady-state concentrations in ELF were 22.1 +/- 14.9 microg/mL, 9.2 +/- 5.3 microg/mL, and 1.5 +/- 0.8 microg/mL, respectively; AM concentrations were 105.1 +/- 65.5 microg/mL, 36.2 +/- 26.1 microg/mL, and 15.1 +/- 2.0 microg/mL, respectively. The concentrations of ciprofloxacin at 4 h and 12 h in ELF were 1.9 +/- 0.9 microg/mL and 0.4 +/- 0.1 microg/mL, respectively; AM concentrations were 34.9 +/- 23.2 microg/mL and 6.8 +/- 5.9 microg/mL, respectively. The differences in the ELF concentrations of the two levofloxacin groups vs those of the ciprofloxacin group were significant (p < 0.05) at each sampling time.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin was more extensively distributed into intrapulmonary compartments than ciprofloxacin and achieved significantly higher steady-state concentrations in plasma and ELF during the 24 h after drug administration.

A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Levofloxacin in Respiratory, Skin and Skin Structure, and Urinary Tract Infections

As a class, the quinolone antibacterials can no longer be assumed to be both effective and relatively free of significant adverse effects. Recent safety issues with newer generation fluoroquinolones, and concerns regarding drug-use associated bacterial resistance have made all drugs in this class subject to intense scrutiny and further study. Levofloxacin is a second generation fluoroquinolone with a post marketing history of well tolerated and successful use in a variety of clinical situations. Quinolones as a class cause a variety of adverse effects, including phototoxicity, seizures and other CNS disturbances, tendonitis and arthropathies, gastrointestinal effects, nephrotoxicity, prolonged QTc interval and torsade de pointes, hypo- or hyperglycaemia, and hypersensitivity reactions. Levofloxacin has been involved in only a few case reports of adverse events, which include QTc prolongation, seizures, glucose disturbances, and tendonitis. Levofloxacin has been shown to be effective at dosages of 250mg to 500mg once-daily in clinical trials in the management of acute maxillary sinusitis, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia, skin and skin structure infections, and urinary tract infections. There are data suggesting that levofloxacin may promote fluoroquinolone resistance among the Streptococcus pneumoniae, and that clinical failures may result from this therapy. Other data suggest that fluoroquinolones with lower potency against Pseudomonas aeruginosa than ciprofloxacin, such as levofloxacin, may drive class-wide resistance to this pathogen. Levofloxacin is an effective drug in many clinical situations, but its cost is significantly higher than amoxicillin, erythromycin, or first and second generation cefalosporins. Because of the propensity to select for fluoroquinolone resistance in the pneumococcus and potentially other pathogens, levofloxacin should be an alternative agent rather than a drug-of-choice in routine community-acquired respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin or skin structure infections. In areas with increasing pneumococcal beta-lactam resistance, levofloxacin may be a reasonable empiric therapy in community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Similarly, in patients with risk factors for infectious complications or poor outcome, levofloxacin may be an excellent empiric choice in severe community-acquired respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, complicated skin or skin structure infections, and nosocomial respiratory and urinary tract infections. Better clinical data are needed to identify the true place in therapy of the newer fluoroquinolones in common community-acquired and nosocomial infections. Until then, these agents, including levofloxacin, might best be reserved for complicated infections, infection recurrence, and infections caused by beta-lactam or macrolide-resistant pathogens.