Activities of LY333328 and vancomycin administered alone or in combination with gentamicin against three strains of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides

The long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) dalbavancin and oritavancin are semisynthetic antimicrobials with broad and potent activity against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. While they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, their pharmacological properties suggest a potential role of these agents for the treatment of deep-seated and severe infections, such as bloodstream and bone and joint infections. The use of these antimicrobials is particularly appealing when prolonged therapy, early discharge, and avoidance of long-term intravascular catheter access are desirable or when multidrug-resistant bacteria are suspected. This review describes the current evidence for the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in the treatment of invasive infections, as well as the hurdles that are preventing their optimal use. Moreover, this review discusses the current knowledge gaps that need to be filled to understand the potential role of LGPs in highly needed clinical scenarios and the ongoing clinical studies that aim to address these voids in the upcoming years.

Differential Activity of the Combination of Vancomycin and Amikacin on Planktonic vs. Biofilm-Growing Staphylococcus aureus Bacteria in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model

Combining currently available antibiotics to optimize their use is a promising strategy to reduce treatment failures against biofilm-associated infections. Nevertheless, most assays of such combinations have been performed in vitro on planktonic bacteria exposed to constant concentrations of antibiotics over only 24 h and the synergistic effects obtained under these conditions do not necessarily predict the behavior of chronic clinical infections associated with biofilms. To improve the predictivity of in vitro combination assays for bacterial biofilms, we first adapted a previously described Hollow-fiber (HF) infection model by allowing a Staphylococcus aureus biofilm to form before drug exposure. We then mimicked different concentration profiles of amikacin and vancomycin, similar to the free plasma concentration profiles that would be observed in patients treated daily over 5 days. We assessed the ability of the two drugs, alone or in combination, to reduce planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacterial populations, and to prevent the selection of resistance within these populations. Although neither amikacin nor vancomycin exhibited any bactericidal activity on S. aureus in monotherapy, the combination had a synergistic effect and significantly reduced the planktonic bacterial population by -3.0 to -6.0 log₁₀ CFU/mL. In parallel, no obvious advantage of the combination, as compared to amikacin alone, was demonstrated on biofilm-embedded bacteria for which the addition of vancomycin to amikacin only conferred a further maximum reduction of 0.3 log₁₀ CFU/mL. No resistance to vancomycin was ever found whereas a few bacteria less-susceptible to amikacin were systematically detected before treatment. These resistant bacteria, which were rapidly amplified by exposure to amikacin alone, could be maintained at a low level in the biofilm population and even suppressed in the planktonic population by adding vancomycin. In conclusion, by adapting the HF model, we were able to demonstrate the different bactericidal activities of the vancomycin and amikacin combination on planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacterial populations, suggesting that, for biofilm-associated infections, the efficacy of this combination would not be much greater than with amikacin monotherapy. However, adding vancomycin could reduce possible resistance to amikacin and provide a relevant strategy to prevent the selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria during treatments.

In vitro synergistic effects of various combinations of vancomycin and non-beta-lactams against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin

The aim of our study was to determine the potential for synergistic effect of vancomycin combined with a non-beta-lactam agent and of combinations of orally available non-beta-lactam agents against vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA). Three VISA isolates, three hVISA isolates, and two vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) isolates were used. The combinations included vancomycin and one of clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, rifampicin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Pairwise combinations among five non-beta-lactam agents were also tested for synergy. Synergy was determined using time-kill curves at 24h. Vancomycin combined with either ciprofloxacin or gentamicin showed synergy against some isolates of VISA, hVISA and VSSA. Vancomycin combined with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole showed synergy against VISA and hVISA. Among orally available non-beta-lactam agents, only ciprofloxacin combined with either clindamycin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole showed synergy against one isolate of VISA.

Monte Carlo simulation analysis of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin pharmacodynamics against intensive care unit-isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The aim of the present study was to compare the potential of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin to achieve their requisite pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to simulate the PK/PD indices of the investigated antimicrobials. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was estimated at minimum inhibitory concentration values ranging from 0.03 to 32 μg/mL to define the PK/PD susceptibility breakpoints. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was computed using minimum inhibitory concentration data from the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit study. Analysis of the simulation results suggested the breakpoints of 4 μg/mL for ceftobiprole (500 mg/2 h t.i.d.), 0.25 μg/mL for dalbavancin (1000 mg), 0.12 μg/mL for daptomycin (4 mg/kg q.d. and 6 mg/kg q.d.) and tigecycline (50 mg b.i.d.), and 2 μg/mL for linezolid (600 mg b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1 g b.i.d. and 1.5 g b.i.d.). The estimated CFR were 100, 100, 70.6, 88.8, 96.5, 82.4, 89.4, and 98.3% for ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin (4 mg/kg/day), daptomycin (6 mg/kg/day), linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin (1 g b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1.5 g b.i.d.), respectively. In conclusion, ceftobiprole and dalbavancin have the highest probability of achieving their requisite PK/PD targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ICU settings. The susceptibility predictions suggested a reduction of the vancomycin breakpoint to 1 μg/mL.

Oritavancin: a new avenue for resistant Gram-positive bacteria

Oritavancin, a new semisynthetic glycopeptide has a spectrum of activity similar to vancomycin, although it exhibits potent antimicrobial activity against vancomycin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci species. It has a long-terminal half-life of 360 h, is highly protein bound and has been dosed once-daily in clinical trials. Oritavancin has been studied in complicated skin and skin structure infections where it was noninferior to the comparator group of vancomycin/cephalexin. Thus far, oritavancin has a favorable side-effect profile and appears promising in the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-positive bacteria.

Pharmacodynamics of a simulated single 1,200-milligram dose of oritavancin in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infection

The safety and efficacy of a single 1,200-mg dose of the lipoglycopeptide oritavancin are currently being investigated in two global phase 3 studies of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. In this study, an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was established to compare the free-drug pharmacodynamics associated with a single 1,200-mg dose of oritavancin to once-daily dosing with daptomycin at 6 mg/kg of body weight and twice-daily dosing with vancomycin at 1,000 mg against three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains over 72 h. The area under the bacterial-kill curve (AUBKC) was used to assess the antibacterial effect of each dosing regimen at 24 h (AUBKC(0-24)), 48 h (AUBKC(0-48)), and 72 h (AUBKC(0-72)). The rapid bactericidal activities of oritavancin and daptomycin contributed to lower AUBKC(0-24)s for the three MRSA strains than with vancomycin (P < 0.05, as determined by analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Oritavancin exposure also resulted in a lower AUBKC(0-48) and AUBKC(0-72) against one MRSA strain and a lower AUBKC(0-48) for another strain than did vancomycin exposure (P < 0.05). Furthermore, daptomycin exposure resulted in a lower AUBKC(0-48) and AUBKC(0-72) for one of the MRSA isolates than did vancomycin exposure (P < 0.05). Lower AUBKC(0-24)s for two of the MRSA strains (P < 0.05) were obtained with oritavancin exposure than with daptomycin. Thus, the antibacterial effect from the single-dose regimen of oritavancin is as effective as that from either once-daily dosing with daptomycin or twice-daily dosing with vancomycin against the MRSA isolates tested in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model over 72 h. These results provide further justification to assess the single 1,200-mg dose of oritavancin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Vancomycin resistance: are there better glycopeptides coming?

The appearance and dissemination of vancomycin resistance among clinically important Gram-positive bacteria was an important watershed in antimicrobial resistance trends that drastically narrows therapeutic options, particularly among the enterococci. Clinical resistance despite apparent susceptibility has also become an increasingly recognized issue with vancomycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia and endocarditis, which may be, in part, due to vancomycin-heteroresistant strains. The newly developed glycopeptides telavancin, dalbavancin and oritavancin have superior in vitro activity, enhanced bactericidality and unique pharmacokinetic properties compared with vancomycin and teicoplanin. Current clinical trial data show noninferiority to vancomycin or standard-of-care antistaphylococcal therapy for complicated skin-skin structure infections, and acceptable safety profiles. Although promising, whether or not these new compounds are clinically efficacious for the true therapeutic deficits created by in vitro and clinical vancomycin resistance is yet to be determined.

Oritavancin: a potential weapon in the battle against serious Gram-positive pathogens

Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with activity against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria. Oritavancin separates itself from other glycopeptides through its potent in vitro activity against resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. Oritavancin possesses a long half-life that should allow, at maximum, once-daily dosing. Currently, oritavancin has completed two Phase III trials and one Phase II trial for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections, and two Phase II trials for the treatment of Gram-positive bacteremia. In all instances, oritavancin displayed favorable outcomes and was noninferior to comparator agents (vancomycin followed by oral cephalexin) when a comparison was made. Further studies are necessary to fully characterize dose and clinical role.

Telavancin: a novel lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosage, and place in therapy of telavancin are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent under development for use in the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections. Telavancin, like vancomycin, inhibits cell-wall biosynthesis by binding to late-stage cell-wall precursors. However, unlike vancomycin, telavancin also depolarizes the bacterial cell membrane and disrupts its functional integrity. Telavancin has concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and is active against gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic organisms. It is highly protein bound (93%) and has a volume of distribution of 115 mL/kg and a half-life of approximately eight hours. Telavancin is eliminated renally, and a dosage reduction is required in renally impaired patients. Animal models suggest that telavancin may be effective in the treatment of soft-tissue infections, bacteremia, endocarditis, meningitis, and pneumonia caused by gram-positive pathogens. Telavancin was not inferior to standard treatment for complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in two Phase II clinical trials and two Phase III clinical trials. A new drug application has been submitted for this indication, and Phase III trials to evaluate use in hospital-acquired-pneumonia, including infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), are planned. Adverse effects include metallic taste, nausea, vomiting, headache, foamy urine, Q-Tc-interval prolongation, hypokalemia, and serum creatinine increases. In trials evaluating telavancin for skin and soft-tissue infections, the dosage was 10 mg/kg i.v. once daily.

CONCLUSION

Telavancin is a promising new agent for gram-positive infections and may offer an alternative to vancomycin for MRSA-associated infections.

Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and its relevance in therapy

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of infections. Only approximately 20% of the strains remain sensitive to penicillin. Beta-lactamase stable penicillins such as flucloxacillin form the mainstay of treatment of staphylococcal infection. Meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics. Glycopeptide antibiotics are effective against most MRSA strains but, in the last few years, isolates of MRSA that have reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides (glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus) have been isolated. Some strains exhibit frank resistance to glycopeptides (vancomycin-resistant S. aureus). Infections due to these strains are difficult to treat. This review summarises the therapeutic options for MRSA, glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus. Novel therapeutic strategies such as immunotherapy and vaccines are also discussed.

Vancomycin for treatment of invasive, multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections

Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterial pathogen responsible for a variety of serious infections and is a frequent cause of nosocomial disease. During the last 60 years, S. aureus has developed increasing in vitro resistance to virtually all antimicrobials. In contrast, vancomycin has maintained a high degree of activity in vitro against this pathogen, although slight changes with in vitro activity could vastly change clinical activity. As a result, vancomycin has become the mainstay of therapy for invasive infections due to methicillin-resistant strains. However, clinical strains of S. aureus with intermediate resistance to vancomycin were reported in 1996, followed in 2002 with reports of isolates that were fully resistant. Although many authorities believe vancomycin remains the drug of choice for most staphylococcal-resistant infections, important issues surrounding its clinical application remain. These include the need for multiple daily dosing, intravenous administration, requirements for serum concentration monitoring, increasing resistance in vitro, modest efficacy rates and (less frequently) treatment-limiting adverse effects. This review addresses these important topics.

Emerging Options for Treatment of Invasive, Multidrug-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusInfections

Limited established treatment options exist for the treatment of serious, invasive infections caused by multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, most notably nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Although vancomycin represents the gold standard for therapy of such invasive infections, reports of increasing in vitro resistance to vancomycin, combined with reports of clinical failures (with this and other antistaphylococcal agents), underscore the need for alternative therapies. Older agents with favorable in vitro activity available in both oral and intravenous dose forms include trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin. Limited clinical data exist to support their routine use as initial therapy in the treatment of invasive disease. However, these and other options (e.g., tetracyclines) are being reexplored in the setting of increasing concern over MRSA acquired in the community setting. Newer treatment options for MRSA include linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin, and tigecycline. With the exception of linezolid, these newer agents require intravenous administration. Combination therapy may be considered in select invasive diseases refractory to standard monotherapies. These diseases include infections such as endocarditis, meningitis, and prosthetic device infections. Additional alternatives to vancomycin are under clinical investigation. Those in later stages of development include oritavancin, dalbavancin, telavancin, and ceftobiprole.

Gram-positive cocci infections in intensive care: guide to antibacterial selection

The incidence of multiresistance in Gram-positive cocci causing infections in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) has increased notably in recent years. Thus, therapeutic proposals have been modified according to the emergence of multiresistant cocci and adapted to epidemiological markers of individual infectious processes, geographical variations of these markers, the availability of new antibacterials, and advances in the knowledge of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of their use. The current management of critically ill patients should consider new therapeutic approaches, such as the "de-escalating strategy", which includes the administration of empirical antibacterials active against multiresistant pathogens followed by directed treatment based on unequivocal data from antibacterial-susceptibility testing. Optimisation of antibacterial treatment should be viewed in the context of the need to determine plasma drug concentrations, pharmacoeconomic considerations and control of drug-related adverse events. Therapeutic proposals should be developed within the framework of the antibacterial policy of each hospital. The present review is focused on the description of the therapeutic strategies for the main infectious processes caused by Gram-positive cocci in severely ill patients admitted to the ICU according to a review of the pertinent literature and the clinical experience of the authors.

Oritavancin – an investigational glycopeptide antibiotic

Antibiotics save countless lives each year; however, increasing rates of drug-resistant bacteria have limited antibiotic selection. Currently, there are few available options for treating resistant Gram-positive organisms. Oritavancin, a novel glycopeptide antibiotic with bactericidal activity, has been developed and recently completed the first round of Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Investigations into oritavancin's efficacy will be explored in catheter-related bacteraemia and nosocomial pneumonia. Oritavancin demonstrates similar activity to vancomycin but possesses extended activity against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus and Enterococcus. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oritavancin appear to be favourable and once-daily dosing is likely. The incidence of multi-drug resistant bacteria is increasing and explorations into additional treatment options are essential. Further development of oritavancin is necessary to determine clinical efficacy.

Pathogens resistant to antimicrobial agents: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and clinical management

Resistance to antimicrobial drugs is increasing at an alarming rate among both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Traditionally, bacteria resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents have been restricted to the nosocomial environment. A disturbing trend has been the recent emergence and spread of resistant pathogens and resistance traits in nursing homes, the community, as well as in hospitals. This article reviews the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms of resistance, and treatment options for pathogens resistant to antimicrobial drugs.

Recent advances in the treatment of infections due to resistant Staphylococcus aureus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews recent data on the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This review will focus on new findings reported in the English-language medical literature from June 2003 to September 2004.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the emergence of resistant and multidrug-resistant S. aureus, we have three effective drugs in clinical use for which little resistance has been observed: quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, and daptomycin. Linezolid looks particularly promising in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia. Daptomycin displays rapid bactericidal activity in vitro, but, so far, clinical trials have only been conducted for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. There are three drugs with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive organisms at an advanced stage of testing: two new glycopeptides with potent bacteriocidal activity and long half-lives (oritavancin and dalbavancin), and tigecycline, a minocycline derivative. These drugs have also shown efficacy in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.

SUMMARY

The promising data that have emerged in the last year indicate that we may have six available drugs to treat resistant S. aureus infections within the next few years. The next goal is to determine the appropriate indications and cost-effectiveness of each of these drugs in our treatment strategy against S. aureus and other Gram-positive pathogens.

Oritavancin and Tigecycline: Investigational Antimicrobials for Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

The advent of multidrug-resistant gram-positive aerobes such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and the enterococci, which are resistant to beta-lactams, vancomycin, and a host of other commonly used antimicrobials, has complicated our approach to antibiotic therapy. Despite marketing of the first oxazolidinone, linezolid, and the streptogramin combination, quinupristin-dalfopristin, an urgent need exists for more agents to combat these pathogens. Two such agents, the glycopeptide oritavancin (LY333328) and the glycylcycline tigecycline (GAR-936), are in phase III clinical trials. These agents, which require parenteral administration, exhibit substantial in vitro activity against a variety of gram-positive aerobes and anaerobes, including the multidrug-resistant organisms listed previously. Only tigecycline demonstrates useful activity against gram-negative organisms. Combination therapy of these agents with ampicillin or aminoglycosides frequently leads to synergistic in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant staphylococci and streptococci. These agents are also active in a variety of animal models of systemic and localized infections. Few published efficacy and tolerability data are available in humans. If controlled clinical trial data verify these agents' efficacy and tolerability, both drugs should become welcome additions to the available antimicrobials. However, restricting their use to the treatment of infections caused by bacteria resistant to other antimicrobials, especially multidrug-resistant staphylococci and streptococci, may prolong their clinical utility by retarding the development of resistance. Careful surveillance of bacterial sensitivity to these agents should be undertaken to assist clinicians in the decision whether or not to use these agents empirically to treat infections caused by suspected multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens.

Glycopeptide Antibiotics

Vancomycin and teicoplanin are still the only glycopeptide antibiotics available for use in humans. Emergence of resistance in enterococci and staphylococci has led to restriction of their use to severe infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria for which no other alternative is acceptable (because of resistance or allergy). In parallel, considerable efforts have been made to produce semisynthetic glycopeptides with improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and with activity towards resistant strains. Several molecules have now been obtained, helping to better delineate structure-activity relationships. Two are being currently evaluated for skin and soft tissue infections and are in phases II/III. The first, oritavancin (LY333328), is the 4'-chlorobiphenylmethyl derivative of chloroeremomycin, an analogue to vancomycin. It is characterised by: i) a spectrum covering vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and to some extent glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA); ii) rapid bactericidal activity including against the intracellular forms of enterococci and staphylococci; and iii) a prolonged half-life, allowing for daily administration. The second molecule is dalbavancin (BI397), a derivative of the teicoplanin analogue A40926. Dalbavancin has a spectrum of activity similar to that of oritavancin against vancomycin-sensitive strains, but is not active against VRE. It can be administered once a week, based on its prolonged retention in the organism. Despite these remarkable properties, the use of these potent agents should be restricted to severe infections, as should the older glycopeptides, with an extension towards resistant or poorly sensitive bacteria, to limit the risk of potential selection of resistance.

Influence of reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides on activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against Staphylococcus aureus in experimental endocarditis

The influence of reduced susceptibilities to glycopeptides on the activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against an isogenic pair of clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains in experimental endocarditis was investigated. While vancomycin was similarly active against both strains, teicoplanin was approximately 100-fold less active against the resistant strain and selected for the emergence of more resistant subpopulations.

Pharmacodynamics of oritavancin (LY333328) in a neutropenic-mouse thigh model of Staphylococcus aureus infection

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oritavancin (LY333328), a glycopeptide antibiotic with concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against gram-positive pathogens, in a neutropenic-mouse thigh model of Staphylococcus aureus infection were studied. Plasma radioequivalent concentrations of oritavancin were determined by using [(14)C]oritavancin at doses ranging from 0.5 to 20 mg/kg of body weight. Peak plasma radioequivalent concentrations after an intravenous dose were 7.27, 12.56, 69.29, and 228.83 micro g/ml for doses of 0.5, 1, 5, and 20 mg/kg, respectively. The maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)) and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased linearly in proportion to the dose. Neither infection nor neutropenia was seen to affect the pharmacokinetics of oritavancin. Intravenous administration resulted in much higher concentrations in plasma than the concentrations obtained with subcutaneous administration. Single-dose dose-ranging studies suggested a sigmoid maximum effect (E(max)) dose-response relationship, with a maximal effect evident at single doses exceeding 2 mg/kg. The oritavancin dose (stasis dose) that resulted in a 24-h colony count similar to the pretreatment count was 1.53 (standard error [SE], 0.35) mg/kg. The single oritavancin dose that resulted in 50% of maximal bacterial killing (ED(50)) was 0.95 (SE, 0.20) mg/kg. Dose fractionation studies suggested that single doses of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 16 mg/kg appeared to have greater bactericidal efficacy than the same total dose subdivided and administered multiple times during the 24-h treatment period. When using an inhibitory E(max) model, C(max) appears to correlate better with bactericidal activity than do the time during which the concentration in plasma exceeds the MIC (T>MIC) and AUC. These data suggest that optimal oritavancin dosing strategies will require regimens that favor high C(max) concentrations rather than long periods during which unbound concentrations in plasma exceed the MIC.

Novel agents for the treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections

Bacteria have proved themselves able to develop resistance to every antibiotic used clinically. Traditional agents used for treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-positive species have recently been supplemented with the introduction of linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, several new quinolones and telithromycin. However, resistance to many of these agents has already been reported and, although each currently retains activity against the vast majority of clinical isolates of its target species, their long-term efficacy is uncertain. We must look to develop other compounds to replace and hopefully improve upon existing anti-Gram-positive agents. Daptomycin (a lipopeptide), oritavancin and dalbavancin (both second-generation glycopeptides) and ramoplanin (a glycolipodepsipeptide) are among the agents in advanced stages of development and, at present, many seem likely to proceed to licensing. In addition, it is encouraging that many agents active against novel bacterial targets have been discovered and are in earlier stages of development. In the next two decades, we should be optimistic that a regular flow of new anti-Gram-positive agents will enable us to offset the constant spectre of bacterial resistance.