Pharmacokinetics of intramuscularly administered ertapenem

Model for Evaluating Antimicrobial Therapy To Prevent Life-Threatening Bacterial Infections following Exposure to a Medically Significant Radiation Dose

More evidence is needed to support recommendations for medical management of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and associated infections resulting from a radiological/nuclear event. While current guidelines recommend the administration of antibiotics to chemotherapy patients with febrile neutropenia, the clinical benefit is unclear for acute radiation injury patients. A well-characterized nonhuman primate (NHP) model of hematopoietic ARS was developed that incorporates supportive care postirradiation. This model evaluated the efficacy of myeloid growth factors within 24 to 48 h after total body irradiation (TBI). However, in this model, NHPs continued to develop life-threatening bacterial infections, even when granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor was administered in combination with antibiotic monotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of combination antibiotic therapies administered to NHPs following 7.4-Gy TBI to understand the occurrence of bacterial infection in NHPs with hematopoietic ARS. We compared enrofloxacin-linezolid, enrofloxacin-cefepime, and enrofloxacin-ertapenem to enrofloxacin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was 60-day postirradiation mortality, with secondary endpoints of overall survival time, incidence of bacterial infection, and bacteriologic culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We observed that enrofloxacin-ertapenem significantly increased survival compared to enrofloxacin monotherapy. Bacteria isolated from nonsurviving macaques with systemic bacterial infections exhibited uniform resistance to enrofloxacin and variable resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, gentamicin, and azithromycin. Multidrug antibiotic resistance was observed in Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli. We conclude that antibiotic combination therapies appear to be more effective than monotherapy alone but acknowledge that more work is needed to identify an optimal antimicrobial therapy.

In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial resistance selection in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Gonococcal infections represent an urgent public-health threat as >50% of cases caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains display reduced susceptibility to at least one antimicrobial agent. We evaluated the pharmacodynamics of a number of antimicrobials against N. gonorrhoeae in order to assess the likelihood of mutant selection by these agents. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) and mutant selection window (MSW) were determined for azithromycin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, ertapenem, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against a wild-type strain of N. gonorrhoeae (ATCC 49226) and a gyrA mutant of ATCC 49226. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including peak concentration (C_max), half-life (t_1/2) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC), associated with each agent were used to calculate the time within the MSW (T_MSW, percentage of the dosing interval that antimicrobial concentrations fall within the MSW), C_max/MPC ratio and AUC/MPC ratio for each antimicrobial agent. Concentrations of ceftriaxone (500 mg), ertapenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin surpass the MPC for both strains. Results of pharmacodynamic analyses suggest that ertapenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin may be most likely to prevent mutant selection in N. gonorrhoeae. Use of ceftriaxone, azithromycin, doxycycline or gentamicin for gonorrhoea is expected to lead to the ongoing emergence of resistance to these agents. There is a clear need to develop novel treatment regimens for gonococcal infections in order to limit the dissemination of resistance in N. gonorrhoeae.

Evaluating parameters affecting drug fate at the intramuscular injection site

Intramuscular (IM) injections are a well-established method of delivering a variety of therapeutics formulated for parenteral administration. While the wide range of commercial IM pharmaceuticals provide a wealth of pharmacokinetic (PK) information following injection, there remains an inadequate understanding of drug fate at the IM injection site that could dictate these PK outcomes. An improved understanding of injection site events could improve approaches taken by formulation scientists to identify therapeutically effective and consistent drug PK outcomes. Interplay between the typically non-physiological aspects of drug formulations and the homeostatic IM environment may provide insights into the fate of drugs at the IM injection site, leading to predictions of how a drug will behave post-injection in vivo. Immune responses occur by design after e.g. vaccine administration, however immune responses post-injection are not in the scope of this article. Taking cues from existing in vitro modelling technologies, the purpose of this article is to propose "critical parameters" of the IM environment that could be examined in hypothesis-driven studies. Outcomes of such studies might ultimately be useful in predicting and improving in vivo PK performance of IM injected drugs.

Model-Informed Drug Development, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Cutoff Value Determination, and Antibacterial Efficacy of Benapenem against Enterobacteriaceae

Benapenem is a novel carbapenem. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) cutoff values and evaluate the optimal administration regimens of benapenem for the treatment of bacterial infections via PK/PD modeling and simulation. Ertapenem was used as a control. Infected mice received an intravenous (i.v.) injection of benapenem or ertapenem of 14.6, 58.4, or 233.6 mg/kg of body weight, and the PK/PD profiles were evaluated.

Benapenem is a novel carbapenem. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) cutoff values and evaluate the optimal administration regimens of benapenem for the treatment of bacterial infections via PK/PD modeling and simulation. Ertapenem was used as a control. Infected mice received an intravenous (i.v.) injection of benapenem or ertapenem of 14.6, 58.4, or 233.6 mg/kg of body weight, and the PK/PD profiles were evaluated. The MICs were determined by using a 2-fold agar dilution method. Mathematical models were developed to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of benapenem in humans and mice. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the cutoff values and the appropriate benapenem dosing regimens for the treatment of infections caused by clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Two 2-compartment models were developed to describe the PK profiles of benapenem in humans and mice. A two-site binding model was applied to fit the protein binding in mouse plasma. Through correlation analysis, the percentage of the time that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (%fT_>MIC) was determined to be the indicator of efficacy. Results from the simulation showed that the probability of target attainment (PTA) against the tested isolates was over 90% with the dosing regimens studied. The PK/PD cutoff value of benapenem was 1 mg/liter at a %fT_>MIC of 60% when given at a dose of 1,000 mg/day by i.v. drip for 0.5 h. The established model provides a better understanding of the pharmacological properties of benapenem for the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae infections. The proposed PK/PD cutoff value suggests that benapenem is a promising antibacterial against the Enterobacteriaceae. The cutoff value of 1 mg/liter may be a useful guide for the clinical use of benapenem and for surveillance for benapenem resistance.

Pharmacokinetics of 2,000 Milligram Ertapenem in Tuberculosis Patients

Ertapenem is a carbapenem antibiotic with activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Dose simulations in a hollow-fiber infection model showed that 2,000 mg once daily is an appropriate dose to be tested in clinical studies. Before using this dose in a phase II study, the aim of this prospective pharmacokinetic study was to confirm the pharmacokinetics of 2,000 mg once daily in tuberculosis (TB) patients. Twelve TB patients received a single intravenous dose of 2,000 mg ertapenem as a 30-min infusion. Blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postadministration. Drug concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. A large interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of ertapenem was observed. The median (interquartile range) area under the plasma concentration-time curve to infinity (AUC_0-∞) was 2,032 (1,751 to 2,346) mg · h/liter, the intercompartmental clearance (CL₁₂) was 1.941 (0.979 to 2.817) liters/h, and the volume of distribution in the central compartment (V₁) was 1.514 (1.064 to 2.210) liters. A more than dose-proportional increase in AUC was observed compared to results reported for 1,000 mg ertapenem in multidrug-resistant TB patients. Based on a MIC of 1.0 mg/liter, 11 out of 12 patients would have reached the target value of unbound drug exceeding the MIC over 40% of the time (f40% T>MIC). In conclusion, this study shows that 2,000 mg ertapenem once daily in TB patients reached the expected f40% T>MIC for most of the patients, and exploration in a phase 2 study can be advocated.

Efficacy and safety of de-escalation therapy to ertapenem for treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an open-label randomized controlled trial

Background

Carbapenem antibiotics are considered the treatment of choice for serious extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections. The study objectives were to evaluate efficacy and safety of de-escalation therapy to ertapenem for treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of adult patients with documented ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections who had received any group 2 carbapenem for less than 96 h. In the intervention group, the previously-prescribed group 2 carbapenem was de-escalated to ertapenem. In the control group, the group 2 carbapenem was continued.

Results

During June 2011–December 2014, 32 patients were randomized to the de-escalation group and 34 to the control group. Most common sites of infection were urinary tract infection (42%). Characteristics of both groups were comparable. By using a 15% predefined margin, ertapenem was non-inferior to control group regarding the clinical cure rate (%Δ = 14.0 [95% confidence interval: −2.4 to 31.1]), the microbiological eradication rate (%Δ = 4.1 [−5.0 to 13.4]), and the superimposed infection rate (%Δ = −16.5 [−38.4 to 5.3]). Patients in the de-escalation group had a significantly lower 28-day mortality rate (9.4% vs. 29.4%; P = .05), a significantly shorter median length of stay (16.5 days [4.0–73.25] vs. 20.0 days [1.0–112.25]; P = .04), and a significantly lower defined daily dose of carbapenem use (12.9 ± 8.9 vs. 18.4 ± 12.6; P = .05).

Conclusions

Ertapenem could be safely used as de-escalation therapy for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections, once the susceptibility profiles are known. Future studies are needed to investigate ertapenem efficacy against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae pneumonia to determine its applicability in life-threatening conditions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01297842. Registered on 14 February 2011. First patient enrolled on 27 June 2011.

Comparative pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of ertapenem 1 gram/day administered as a rapid 5-minute infusion versus the standard 30-minute infusion in healthy adult volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare ertapenem pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability when administered as a rapid 5-minute infusion to the standard 30-minute infusion.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

Clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Twelve healthy adult volunteers.

INTERVENTION

Each subject received ertapenem 1 g intravenously, administered either as a rapid 5-minute infusion or the standard 30-minute infusion, every 24 hours for 3 days (first phase); after a 4-day washout period, each subject then received the other infusion every 24 hours for 3 days (second phase).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma samples were collected after the first and third (steady-state) doses of each study phase, and protein binding was assessed by use of ultrafiltration. Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted using noncompartmental and compartmental methods. A 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the probability of target attainment for free drug concentration remaining above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 40% or greater of the dosing interval (40% fT > MIC) over an MIC range. Ertapenem was well tolerated and adverse events were similar for both infusions. The ertapenem steady-state mean ± SD maximum concentrations were 193.3 ± 43.3 and 165.7 ± 20.4 mg/L for the 5- and 30-minute infusions, respectively; the mean ± SD areas under the concentration-time curves from 0-24 hours were 561.2 ± 77.0 and 531.3 ± 56.9 μg · hr/ml (geometric mean ratio 1.008, 90% confidence interval 0.999-1.017), respectively. Protein binding was concentration dependent (range 87.9-98.9%). A two-compartment model best described ertapenem pharmacokinetics with the following parameter estimates: clearance 1.89 ± 0.19 L/hr, volume of central compartment 5.04 ± 0.56 L, and transfer constants k12 0.43 ± 0.08/hr and k21 0.44 ± 0.07/hr. The probabilities of target attainment for 5- and 30-minute infusions were 97.0% and 97.9% at an MIC of 0.25 mg/L and 1.7% and 2.8% at an MIC of 0.5 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ertapenem administered as a rapid 5-minute infusion provides a well tolerated, bioequivalent, and pharmacodynamically equivalent regimen to the 30-minute infusion at clinically relevant MICs.

Prevention of infections associated with combat-related extremity injuries

During combat operations, extremities continue to be the most common sites of injury with associated high rates of infectious complications. Overall, ∼ 15% of patients with extremity injuries develop osteomyelitis, and ∼ 17% of those infections relapse or recur. The bacteria infecting these wounds have included multidrug-resistant bacteria such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella species and Escherichia coli, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The goals of extremity injury care are to prevent infection, promote fracture healing, and restore function. In this review, we use a systematic assessment of military and civilian extremity trauma data to provide evidence-based recommendations for the varying management strategies to care for combat-related extremity injuries to decrease infection rates. We emphasize postinjury antimicrobial therapy, debridement and irrigation, and surgical wound management including addressing ongoing areas of controversy and needed research. In addition, we address adjuvants that are increasingly being examined, including local antimicrobial therapy, flap closure, oxygen therapy, negative pressure wound therapy, and wound effluent characterization. This evidence-based medicine review was produced to support the Guidelines for the Prevention of Infections Associated With Combat-Related Injuries: 2011 Update contained in this supplement of Journal of Trauma.

Ertapenem: the new carbapenem 5 years after first FDA licensing for clinical practice

Ertapenem, a parenteral broad-spectrum 1-beta-methyl-carbapenem, was licensed 5 years ago for clinical practice in the US and Europe. The substance has a good in vitro activity against many common aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Its in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae carrying plasmid- or chromosomal-mediated beta-lactamases, including AmpC- and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, is especially clinically significant. Advantages concerning in vitro activity and low potential for so-called 'collateral damage', and development of own resistance during therapy, as shown in several randomized, controlled clinical trials, make ertapenem an excellent treatment choice for complicated aerobic and anaerobic mix infections caused by ertapenem-sensitive bacteria. On the other hand, due to its limited activity against Acinetobacter spp., enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it is less suitable for late-onset nosocomial infections. International guidelines recommend the initial empirical use of ertapenem for intra-abdominal infections, skin and skin-structure infections, acute pelvic infections, complicated urinary tract infections and pneumonia (both community-acquired and 'early-onset' nosocomial) in a dose of 1.0 g administered once daily. However, recent results from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling studies in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and adipose volunteers with a body mass index of > or = 20 kg/m(2) showed that the standard dose of 1.0 g/day may not provide adequate free, protein-unbound drug concentrations in plasma and organ tissues. Therefore, a shortening of the dosage interval or continuous infusion of ertapenem should be considered to ensure optimal free concentrations in these particular populations.

Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ertapenem and nine other comparator agents against 337 anaerobic bacteria

Ertapenem activity in vitro was compared with that of nine reference antibiotics against 337 anaerobes by determining minimal inhibition concentrations (MICs). Amongst 246 Gram-negative anaerobes, 4, 8, 3, 4, 7, 2 and 52 strains showed resistance to ertapenem, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem and clindamycin, respectively, and all strains were inhibited by metronidazole. Ertapenem MIC(50) values were 0.5, 0.25, 0.06 and <or=0.03mg/L for the Bacteroides fragilis group, Prevotella spp., fusobacteria and Gram-positive cocci, respectively. Overall resistance rates were 2.1%, 51.3%, 2.4%, 1.2%, 1.5%, 7.1%, 0.6%, 22% and 1.5% for ertapenem, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem, clindamycin and metronidazole, respectively. Ertapenem showed a broad spectrum and good activity against anaerobes.

Ertapenem: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections

The Group 1, 1 beta-methyl carbapenem ertapenem (Invanz) is approved for parenteral use in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute pelvic infection caused by susceptible strains of certain designated organisms in both the US and the EU. Additional approved indications in the US include complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Ertapenem is approved for use in adults in both the US and the EU and in paediatric patients aged >or=3 months in the US. Ertapenem has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-negative pathogens, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-positive pathogens and anaerobic pathogens. It has similar efficacy to comparator antibacterials such as piperacillin/tazobactam in cSSSI (including diabetic foot infection), cIAI and acute pelvic infection and ceftriaxone with or without metronidazole in cIAI, cUTI and CAP. The drug has also shown efficacy in the treatment of paediatric patients with complicated community-acquired bacterial infections. Ertapenem has a convenient once-daily administration schedule and is generally well tolerated. Thus, ertapenem is an important option for the empirical treatment of complicated community-acquired bacterial infections in hospitalised patients.

Quantification of the carbapenem antibiotic ertapenem in human plasma by a validated liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method

BACKGROUND

Ertapenem (Invanz) is a newly developed carbapenem beta-lactam antibiotic. LC-MS is the method of choice for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of a variety of drugs including antibiotics. No validated LC-MS method for ertapenem quantification is described in the literature so far.

METHODS

A rapid and robust LC-MS quantification method for ertapenem was developed and validated for clinical routine application in plasma samples. After immediate stabilisation with MES buffer (pH 6.5), samples were prepared for LC-MS analysis using simple protein precipitation. LC-MS coupling was realised by the use of a Phenomenex Synergi 4micro Polar-RP A80 Mercury LC column (10 x 2.0 mm) in combination with a Single-MS (Agilent 1100 LC-MSD SL) operating in negative selected ion monitoring (SIM) detection mode with ceftazidime as internal standard for adequate selective and sensitive analysis.

RESULTS

LC-MS method validation by means of determination of limit of detection (LOD 0.1 microg mL-1), lower limit of quantification (LLOQ 1 microg mL-1), linearity (0.1-50 microg mL-1), recovery (> 90%), intra- and inter-day precision (RSD < 10%), accuracy (> 90%), inter-subject variability (< 10% at LLOQ), drug stability in plasma (> 3 months) and in post-extracted samples (> 99% for 24 h), and matrix effects (process efficiency > 90%) showed excellent performance parameters considering Guidance for Industry - Bioanalytical Method Validation.

CONCLUSION

This method is perfectly appropriate for routine quantification of ertapenem and possibly other polar carbapenem beta-lactam antibiotics.

Assay of ertapenem in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography

Ertapenem is a new carbapenem with a broad spectrum of activity and an extended half-life, permitting once daily administration. Although high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods have been described for ertapenem, these are complex and involve column switching and thus this type of assay may not suitable for use in routine clinical microbiology laboratories. In this study we report a rapid, straightforward HPLC method for the detection of ertapenem in human serum.

Ertapenem: review of a new carbapenem

The carbapenems are beta-lactam-type antibiotics with an exceptionally broad spectrum of activity. Ertapenem is a new carbapenem developed to address the pharmacokinetic shortcomings (short half-life) of imipenem and meropenem. Ertapenem shares similar structural features with meropenem, including its stability to dehydropeptidase-1, allowing it to be administered without a dehydropeptidase-1 inhibitor. Ertapenem, like imipenem and meropenem, demonstrates broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against many Gram-positive and -negative aerobes and anaerobes and is resistant to nearly all beta-lactamases, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and AmpCs. However, it differs from both imipenem and meropenem in demonstrating limited activity against Enterococcusspp., Pseudomonasaeruginosa and other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria commonly associated with nosocomial infections. The extensive protein binding of ertapenem extends the half-life and allows for once-daily dosing. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical studies demonstrate similar clinical efficacy of ertapenem compared with other agents. Clinical trials of complicated intra-abdominal infection, acute pelvic infection, complicated skin and soft-structure infection, community-acquired pneumonia and complicated urinary tract infections demonstrated that ertapenem has equivalent efficacy and safety compared with ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Ertapenem is a promising new carbapenem with excellent efficacy and safety for the treatment of a variety of community-acquired infections. It also appears to be of great value as an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections

Ertapenem, a carbapenem antibacterial, has in vitro activity against many Gram- negative (including Enterobacteriaceae) and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria that are commonly associated with various infections.Once-daily parenteral (intravenous or intramuscular) ertapenem 1g was as effective as comparator antimicrobial agents (piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftriaxone +/- metronidazole) in patients with bacterial infections in randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials. Response rates with ertapenem were 84% and 87% (combined microbiological and clinical) in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (CIAI), 82% (clinical) in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (CSSSI), 86% and 92% (microbiological) in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (CUTI), 92% (clinical) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) associated with typical pathogens and 94% (clinical) in patients with acute pelvic infection. Respective response rates were statistically equivalent to those with comparators (81-94%). The efficacy of ertapenem was equivalent to that of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae or anaerobes and to ceftriaxone in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated by patients with bacterial infections, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. The most common ertapenem-associated adverse events were diarrhoea, infused vein complication, nausea, headache, vaginitis in females, phlebitis and/or thrombophlebitis and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

Ertapenem is a broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotic with activity against many Gram-negative (including Enterobacteriaceae) and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and is suitable for once-daily administration. Ertapenem has a role in the treatment of CAP associated with typical respiratory pathogens and is of particular value in the treatment of polymicrobial infections (such as CIAI, CSSSI, CUTI and acute pelvic infections), especially where Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobic bacteria are involved.