Recognition of β-strand motifs by RseB is required for σ(E) activity in Escherichia coli

Roles of the membrane-reentrant β-hairpin-like loop of RseP protease in selective substrate cleavage

Molecular mechanisms underlying substrate recognition and cleavage by Escherichia coli RseP, which belongs to S2P family of intramembrane-cleaving proteases, remain unclear. We examined the function of a conserved region looped into the membrane domain of RseP to form a β-hairpin-like structure near its active site in substrate recognition and cleavage. We observed that mutations disturbing the possible β-strand conformation of the loop impaired RseP proteolytic activity and that some of these mutations resulted in the differential cleavage of different substrates. Co-immunoprecipitation and crosslinking experiments suggest that the loop directly interacts with the transmembrane segments of substrates. Helix-destabilising mutations in the transmembrane segments of substrates suppressed the effect of loop mutations in an allele-specific manner. These results suggest that the loop promotes substrate cleavage by selectively recognising the transmembrane segments of substrates in an extended conformation and by presenting them to the proteolytic active site, which contributes to substrate discrimination.

Evidence of a bacterial receptor for lysozyme: binding of lysozyme to the anti-σ factor RsiV controls activation of the ecf σ factor σV

σ factors endow RNA polymerase with promoter specificity in bacteria. Extra-Cytoplasmic Function (ECF) σ factors represent the largest and most diverse family of σ factors. Most ECF σ factors must be activated in response to an external signal. One mechanism of activation is the stepwise proteolytic destruction of an anti-σ factor via Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis (RIP). In most cases, the site-1 protease required to initiate the RIP process directly senses the signal. Here we report a new mechanism in which the anti-σ factor rather than the site-1 protease is the sensor. We provide evidence suggesting that the anti-σ factor RsiV is the bacterial receptor for the innate immune defense enzyme, lysozyme. The site-1 cleavage site is similar to the recognition site of signal peptidase and cleavage at this site is required for σ^V activation in Bacillus subtilis. We reconstitute site-1 cleavage in vitro and demonstrate that it requires both signal peptidase and lysozyme. We demonstrate that the anti-σ factor RsiV directly binds to lysozyme and muramidase activity is not required for σ^V activation. We propose a model in which the binding of lysozyme to RsiV activates RsiV for signal peptidase cleavage at site-1, initiating proteolytic destruction of RsiV and activation of σ^V. This suggests a novel mechanism in which conformational change in a substrate controls the cleavage susceptibility for signal peptidase. Thus, unlike other ECF σ factors which require regulated intramembrane proteolysis for activation, the sensor for σ^V activation is not the site-1 protease but the anti-σ factor.

All cells sense and respond to changes in their environments by transmitting information across the membrane. In bacteria, σ factors provide promoter specificity to RNA polymerase. Bacteria encode Extra-Cytoplasmic Function (ECF) σ factors, which often respond to extracellular signals. Activation of some ECF σ factors is controlled by stepwise proteolytic destruction of an anti-σ factor which is initiated by a site-1 protease. In most cases, the site-1 protease required to initiate the RIP process is thought to be the signal sensor. Here we report that the anti-σ factor RsiV, and not the site-1 protease, is the sensor for σ^V activation. Activation of the ECF σ factor σ^V is induced by lysozyme, an innate immune defense enzyme. We identify the site-1 protease as signal peptidase, which is required for general protein secretion. The anti-σ factor RsiV directly binds lysozyme. Binding of lysozyme to RsiV allows signal peptidase to cleave RsiV at site-1 and this leads to activation of σ^V. Thus, the anti-σ factor functions as a bacterial receptor for lysozyme. RsiV homologs from C. difficile and E. faecalis also bind lysozyme, suggesting they may utilize this receptor-ligand mechanism to control activation of σ^V to induce lysozyme resistance.

A structure-based model of substrate discrimination by a noncanonical PDZ tandem in the intramembrane-cleaving protease RseP

During the extracytoplasmic stress response in Escherichia coli, the intramembrane protease RseP cleaves the anti-σ(E) protein RseA only after the membrane-anchored protease DegS truncates the periplasmic part of RseA that suppresses the action of RseP. Here we analyzed the three-dimensional structure of the two tandemly arranged PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 (PDZ) domains (PDZ tandem) present in the periplasmic region of RseP and revealed that the two putative ligand-binding grooves constitute a single pocket-like structure that would lie just above the active center sequestrated within the membrane. Complete removal of the PDZ tandem from RseP led to the intramembrane cleavage of RseA without prior truncation by DegS. Furthermore, mutations expected to destabilize the tertiary structure of the PDZ tandem also caused the deregulation of the sequential cleavage. These observations suggest that the PDZ tandem serves as a size-exclusion filter to accommodate the truncated form of RseA into the active center.

Biochemical and structural insights into intramembrane metalloprotease mechanisms

Intramembrane metalloproteases are nearly ubiquitous in living organisms and they function in diverse processes ranging from cholesterol homeostasis and the unfolded protein response in humans to sporulation, stress responses, and virulence of bacteria. Understanding how these enzymes function in membranes is a challenge of fundamental interest with potential applications if modulators can be devised. Progress is described toward a mechanistic understanding, based primarily on molecular genetic and biochemical studies of human S2P and bacterial SpoIVFB and RseP, and on the structure of the membrane domain of an archaeal enzyme. Conserved features of the enzymes appear to include transmembrane helices and loops around the active site zinc ion, which may be near the membrane surface. Extramembrane domains such as PDZ (PSD-95, DLG, ZO-1) or CBS (cystathionine-β-synthase) domains govern substrate access to the active site, but several different mechanisms of access and cleavage site selection can be envisioned, which might differ depending on the substrate and the enzyme. More work is needed to distinguish between these mechanisms, both for enzymes that have been relatively well-studied, and for enzymes lacking PDZ and CBS domains, which have not been studied. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Intramembrane Proteases.

Alternative sigma factor σE has an important role in stress tolerance of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis IP32953

Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is an important pathogen that probably survives well in the modern food chain. However, little is known about the mechanisms that allow the growth of this pathogen in foods under stress conditions. The expression of rpoE encoding σ(E) was defined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Expression of rpoE was induced at 3°C, 37°C, and 42°C, under exposure to 3% NaCl, 3% ethanol, or high and low pH, in relation to its expression at the optimum growth temperature of 28°C of Y. pseudotuberculosis. Mutation of rpoE either impaired or abolished growth under stresses caused by low or high temperature, low pH, and ethanol. In addition, the growth temperature range of the mutant was significantly diminished compared to that of the wild-type strain IP32953. The results were confirmed with complementation of the mutant. Thus, σ(E) plays a significant role in the stress tolerance of Y. pseudotuberculosis IP32953 and probably contributes to the survival of this pathogen in the food chain.

Offense and defense: microbial membrane vesicles play both ways

Microbes have evolved over millennia to become adapted and specialized to the environments that they occupy. These environments may include water or soil, extreme environments such as hydrothermal vents, and can even include a host organism. To become adapted to these locations, microbes have evolved specific tools to mediate interactions with the environment. One such tool that prokaryotes have evolved includes the production of membrane vesicles (MVs). MVs are 10-300 nm spherical blebs derived from the outermost membrane and have known functions in protein secretion, immune activation and suppression, stress response, attachment, internalization and virulence. In this review, we consider the highly conserved role of membrane vesicles derived from Gram-negative, Gram-positive and archaeal species as a mechanism to facilitate intermicrobial and microbe-host interaction. We examine both the offensive and defensive capabilities of MVs in regard to the interaction of MVs with both host and microbial cells in their environment.

Extra cytoplasmic function σ factor activation

The bacterial cell envelope is essential for cell viability and is a target for numerous antibiotics and host immune defenses. Thus bacteria must sense and respond to damage to the cell envelope. Many bacteria utilize alternative σ factors such as extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors to respond to cell envelope stress. Although ECF σ factors are utilized by both Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria to respond to cell envelope stress, the mechanisms of sensing differ. In this review, we examine the events and proteins that are required for activation of two model extracytoplasmic function σ factors, σ(E) in E. coli and σ(W) in B. subtilis.

Making a beta-barrel: assembly of outer membrane proteins in Gram-negative bacteria

The outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria is an essential organelle that serves as a selective permeability barrier by keeping toxic compounds out of the cell while allowing vital nutrients in. How the OM and its constituent lipid and protein components are assembled remains an area of active research. In this review, we describe our current understanding of how outer membrane proteins (OMPs) are delivered to and then assembled in the OM of the model Gram-negative organism Escherichia coli.